College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Anti-war rally draws thousand protesters

By Mick B. Krever

Print this article

Published: Monday, October 19, 2009

Updated: Monday, October 19, 2009

Activists from across New England converged on Copley Square on Saturday to protest U.S. involvement in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, with the demonstration culminating in an organized march through downtown Boston.
   

The anti-war rally drew approximately 1,000 participants, according to rally organizer and Tufts graduate student Rebecca Batorsky.
   

Over a dozen speakers and performers rallied the crowds for more than two hours in the 40-degree weather. Among the headlining speakers was Matthis Chiroux, a veteran of the war in Afghanistan who, after an honorable discharge, refused redeployment to Iraq. Chiroux currently serves as a member of Iraq Veterans Against the War.
   

“We’re not fighting terrorists; we’re fighting people,” Chiroux told the crowd amassed in front of Trinity Church. “Death is not a solution to terror. We cannot kill ourselves out of this problem.”
   

The rally came at a time when President Barack Obama is considering sending more troops to Afghanistan, a strategy similar to the 2007 troop surge in Iraq. Obama was elected in large part due to his opposition to the Iraq war, but many at the rally felt betrayed by his desire to escalate the war in Afghanistan.
   

Chiroux said that any U.S. military involvement in Afghanistan is bound to fail, even if the military were to follow a strategy that places greater emphasis on development over combat.
   

“The idea of having U.S. military personnel distribute that aid to me is pretty asinine,” Chiroux told the Daily after his speech. “Make no mistake: We are a bull in the china shop. And when you get a bull inside a china shop, you don’t make him fix the broken china; you get him the heck out and write a check. Right now we’re trying to force the bull to fix the china.”
   

Brendan Curran, who is studying to become a priest at the Episcopal Divinity School in Cambridge, attended the rally and expressed his anger about Obama’s first nine months in office. 
   

“I thought he was going to be a peace candidate, and he’s not following through,” Curran told the Daily. “I danced in the streets when he got elected. And he’s not following through on the war ... He’s being spineless.”
   

Curran, who is 25 years old, was part of a minority of young people in attendance; the crowd was mostly made up of long-time peace activists.
   

Batorsky was disappointed by the low turnout from college-aged students. She said a similar rally held last year saw large student involvement and was surprised by the small number of youths that came out on Saturday.
   

“This year, I can’t imagine that people’s sentiments about the war have changed, but maybe they’re not as forceful as they were because they’re not sure what to think about Obama … They’re not sure how to make their voices heard,” she said.
   

Cynthia Snow, a retiree from Brookline, emphasized what she saw as a misallocation of government resources.
  

“I don’t think killing people is going to solve anything,” Snow told the Daily. “If you put half the resources that are going into killing people into supporting education, better health care and well-being, here and around the world, it would do a lot more good than we’re doing now.”
   

Dave Tiffany, who traveled from his home in New Hampshire for the rally, is retired but keeps busy as a full-time activist. He has held weekly vigils for four years and attends several anti-war events a week in his home state. He prides himself on being the questioner who, in January 2008, pushed Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) to say that he would be willing to keep American troops in Afghanistan for 100 years, which became a contentious campaign issue.
   

Tiffany, like most of those at the rally, rejected the notion of “the good war,” a term which Obama has used to describe U.S. military action in Afghanistan.
   

“I understand that we have to do something about al-Qaeda, but nation-building in Afghanistan has nothing to do with that,” Tiffany said. “I don’t understand why we’re expending all these lives.”
   

The one-and-a-half mile march through Boston, which included a brass band and a puppet troupe, was punctuated by chants of “Our streets, their war,” and “U.S. out of the Middle East — no peace, no justice.”
   

The march was relatively peaceful, despite several shouting matches between marchers and a man wearing a dishdasha, a traditional Arabic tunic, who was carrying a sign with the slogan, “Obama is a Jewish puppet.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

3 comments

Toby Bonthrone LA'09
Sun Nov 15 2009 19:04
Jen,
I could write a rebuttal, but I'm afraid your comment about us committing genocide hinted at what this "conversation" would degenerate into, and reminded me of that line, that "arguing over the internet is like the Special Olympics. Even if you win, you're still retarded". Of course, if anyone from Tufts ever stumbles across this page and reads my comments, I can stand by to take incoming over my inappropriate use of anachronistic, hateful descriptive terms for persons with mental impairments.
Yours aye,
Toby
Julia
Wed Oct 21 2009 16:54
Toby, those comments are completely mislead. The longer US troops are in Afghanistan, the WORSE it's going to get. We've destroyed any chance they have of developing. The US military is NOT bringing the Afghan people "education, women's rights, and health care" as you imply. They are participating in a genocidal war of aggression. You tell me if we're any safer now that we've invaded Afghanistan or if the Afghan people are better off now that our troops are the ones oppressing them as opposed to the Taliban (a group which was, in fact, created by the CIA in order to stop Soviet communism from coming into Afghanistan back in the 1970's).

I think the one thing Americans forget is the reason why the USA was attacked on 9/11 in the first place. It wasn't "radical Islam", it wasn't because the hijackers "hated our freedom" as if they were so outraged by the US Constitution that they decided to attack us, and it wasn't because of Hollywood. IT WAS ANGER OVER AMERICAN FOREIGN POLICY IN THE MIDDLE EAST, specifically American support for Israel and corrupt Arab regimes (like the Saudi government). People forget as well that the members of al-Qaeda were dissidents in their own countries (Saudi, Egypt, and Lebanon) far before they became "anti-American". Face it, the best way to stop another attack like this from happening is to change our attitude towards the Arab and Muslim World.

Toby Bonthrone LA'09
Mon Oct 19 2009 09:21
“I don’t think killing people is going to solve anything,” Snow told the Daily. “If you put half the resources that are going into killing people into supporting education, better health care and well-being, here and around the world, it would do a lot more good than we’re doing now.”

I'm glad that these peace activists are taking the same stance as our military leaders. They've been making the same statements about the impossibility of killing our way out of this war. I'm afraid the Taliban aren't big supporters of education, health care and well-being, though. Ah well, screw the Afghans. The moral high ground of well-educated, healthy people in Cambridge is much more important than the future education, health care and well-being of civilians in Afghanistan.







log out