Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Drinking culture takes center stage at meeting

Published: Thursday, November 19, 2009

Updated: Thursday, November 19, 2009 05:11


Dozens of students, staff and administrators grappled last night with the question of alcohol abuse on campus, discussing why it is so prevalent and how things might be changed.

At a town-hall meeting focused on what has become a hot-button topic this semester, participants voiced broad concern for students' safety and perceptions of drinking norms.

"I think we're all on the same side, which is student safety, reasonable lifestyle and not having anybody get hurt and die," Dean of Student Affairs Bruce Reitman, who organized the meeting, said during the discussion. He emphasized the need for cooperation among students and administrators in order to stem the trend toward dangerous drinking at Tufts.

Convened as part of the dean of arts and sciences' semesterly series of town-hall meetings, the gathering took place at the Remis Sculpture Court in the Aidekman Arts Center and attracted dozens of attendees, who filtered in and out. About 50 were present at its peak.

Reitman outlined several major alcohol-related episodes that occurred recently at Tufts. He spoke about the overwhelming number of medical incidents that emergency services responded to at last year's Spring Fling, seniors getting kicked out of a Senior Pub Night in September and the failure of this semester's I-Cruise to leave the dock due to student drunkenness.

In May, Reitman chartered the Alcohol Task Force to review the university's alcohol regulations and offer recommendations to a policy-setting steering committee on alcohol. The task force began meeting this fall and is hoping to release a draft of its recommendations soon.

"This is our issue, this is our problem," said Reitman, who sits on the steering committee. "We have to work together on it, so we're willing to listen to suggestions for changes to policy."

Dean of Arts and Sciences Robert Sternberg stated that dangerous drinking and hospitalization have been on the rise at the university in the past few years.

Michelle Bowdler, the senior director of Health and Wellness Service, attributed this to evolving mentalities. "There's been a culture change over the last three to five years that's actually one of the things that we're so worried about," she said.

Bowdler added that recent surveys have shown that over half of Tufts students binge drink, a significant percentage that she hopes will drop. She said most schools in the Northeast similar to Tufts have lower percentages.

Both students and administrators at the meeting emphasized the creation of more programming and venues to provide alternatives to the campus drinking culture — but they voiced varying levels of confidence in the ability of such programming to achieve the cultural change that many were calling for.

Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senator Sam Wallis spoke about the possibility of using Hotung Café as alternative event space.

"One of the things we're talking about … is turning Hotung into a late-night diner where you build a culture around the food rather than the booze, so to speak," said Wallis, a junior.

Freshman Maya Grodman is one of the students who has spearheaded the recent creation of Another Option, a student group exploring alcohol-free social choices. "We're just one example of students who are trying to take initiatives to provide other activities than drinking," she said.

But Junior Class Council President Lindsey Rosenbluth expressed doubts that alternative programming would deter students who already drink excessively from doing so.

"I think [alternative programming is] a lot of fun on a student-activities or a social-life level, but I don't know that it would counteract the drinking at all," she said.

TCU Senator Bruce Ratain, a junior who is a member of the Alcohol Task Force, thought that popular student groups should hold their events later in the evening to attract students away from drinking. Office for Campus Life Director Joe Golia agreed.

"We changed a few rules where on Thursday, Friday and Saturday night you can't start in Hotung before eight o'clock," said Golia, whose office manages the daily operations of the campus center, which houses Hotung Café. "We encourage every group to start as late as possible."

Golia, however, noted that programming is not the underlying solution to the campus drinking culture.

"It's not ultimately the answer," he said. "It is a part of it, and I will agree, but I have never been at a place where there is more programming than Tufts."

Students at the town-hall meeting pointed to "pregaming" as one of the greatest source of dangerous drinking. They noted the often-clandestine activity occurs before events that serve alcohol as well as those that do not.

"We really need to concentrate a lot on pregaming," sophomore Jake Schiller said. "I think that's the underlying cause of a lot of the dangerous situations."

Participants also discussed the importance of peer influence and the need to create alcohol-education programs in which students can share their own experiences with dangerous binge drinking. Many said that these programs were especially needed during freshman orientation.

TCU President Brandon Rattiner, a senior and the only member of both the Alcohol Task Force and the steering committee, said that the group of students who party hard on a weekly basis is smaller than many freshmen realize, and that this misperception leads more freshmen to drink every year.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

10 comments Log in to Comment

Your name
Thu Nov 19 2009 13:28
Antonio,

You establish a straw argument by suggesting that the administration is trying to get rid of drinking completely. In the article the administration mentions that recent surveys have motivated this recent change.

"Bowdler added that recent surveys have shown that over half of Tufts students binge drink, a significant percentage that she hopes will drop. She said most schools in the Northeast similar to Tufts have lower percentages."

In keeping with your weak argument you compare drinking to driving a car, stating that drinking in and of itself isn't dangerous. Sure having a keystone a week won't do anything but 50% of the campus binge drinking? If you think that's inconsequential you're insane. Everybody knows the medical effects of alcohol so there's no need to rehash them here. Have a war on drinking? No. A campaign to curb binge drinking? Probably a good idea.

Antonio
Thu Nov 19 2009 11:57
Haha sorry for the huge comment. I like writing, wrote this little essay, and really have no where else to put it. The only thing missing is where the ellipse is on the original, it should read: "Social pressure easily and more effectively accomplishes what national and local administrations here try so desperately to achieve, and for 100% less money as well!"
Antonio
Thu Nov 19 2009 11:55
In the particular case of Tufts, my view is that the administration has failed, and will continue to fail, in addressing what is indeed a problem on this campus, because they refuse to accept the reality that human nature will drive curious young people to experiment with the world- in this case, to “try” alcohol and its effects. To them, it is unacceptable if even one underage student were to drink alcohol, and this attitude means all approaches in which some drinking would occur are out-of-the-question; it is an all-or-nothing approach for them. I don’t have a specific answer as far as any particular actions to be undertaken, but I do think accepting that students drink, that it is “OK” to drink in moderation, and that it is actually over-drinking that is unacceptable, is the only way to allow a framework where a realistic solution can be achieved. In other words, the only way to solve the problem of young students drinking dangerous levels of alcohol is to change the culture that facilitates such acts. However, I can’t think of any historical example outside of overt violence where an authority has changed a culture with topical, punitive action.

Allow me to close by reframing the argument in this way: The Puritans came to the “New World” with a glorious vision of creating a society free of vice where all undesirable elements of human nature would be removed and only the desirable ones would be allowed to flourish. I think it’s safe to say that millions of years of “human” (whatever that means) evolution made a rather assertive statement regarding that idea. The “New World” is now become almost the opposite of that particular vision; we have become a culture of consumption and vice. The problem is that we view any sort of selfish behavior as a “viceful”, i.e., drinking, smoking, relaxing, are all “guilty pleasures”. These attitudes continue to prevail in the efforts of the current administration, undermining their work. These proposed seminars to talk about binge-drinking and the planned activities intended to be juxtaposed with late-night “partying” are subtly, but directly, created to be in conflict with the culture of drinking- to “combat” it, if you will. Driven by this mentality, the result will be more of the same: conversion of the converted and retaliation by the others: in other words, those that already don’t participate in the drinking culture will attend these events, and those that feel threatened by them will either “pregame” for them or go somewhere else to drink heavily. This means a continued division of camps between drinkers and non-drinkers where both parties reinforce the actions and attitudes of their peer constituents. Only a mixing of parties will serve to water-down the drinking culture (see what I did there?) into something more safe and acceptable.

Drinking CAN be dangerous, but it is not inherently dangerous. Framing alcohol as a dangerous substance to be avoided at all costs is both ignorant and irresponsible for an institution of higher learning. Driving a car can also be dangerous but Tufts facilitates car-driving by even allowing places for students to park their cars! I know that last sentence is a bit exaggerated (driving a car is legal) but the point I mean to illustrate is that the issue is not IF people drive their cars (read: drink) but HOW they drive them that results in dangerous situations. The legal status of underage drinking does pose a tricky problem for University policy, but I think at a school like Tufts, where we would like to feel we have a more nuanced and enlightened approach to the world, our current attitudes and policies are anachronistic and ham-fisted at best. When new students enter campus, they quickly begin forming opinions and attitudes based on observation and social reinforcement. What is the example we are setting for the future of what we would like to be an “elite” institution?

Let’s hold our heads high, and begin showing ourselves and new students alike that this school is one of adults, not children, who don’t need to be scolded or “put on time out” for drinking alcohol. This requires both a change in attitude from the administration and from the behavior of students. It’s not fun or cool to be consistently “blackout” drunk, but the more people act as if this is the only way to drink alcohol, then that image will continue to exist as an alluring act of rebellion. I think a successful solution lies in our future if both the students and administration here stop viewing alcohol as such a terrible thing and begin acting sensibly. I want to close by saying that personally, I find the fact that such discussion even exists and is furthermore necessary as a sign of a large problem in focus. Tufts students want to change the world but they can’t even deal with something as insignificant as alcohol in a logical, modern, or enlightened manner? That does not reflect well on either the University or the student body.

Antonio
Thu Nov 19 2009 11:54
I am both an alumnus and current student at Tufts, and I really wish I didn't just find out about this meeting today, as I would have loved to attend. One of my biggest concerns with Tufts has been its archaic approach to American Drinking Culture, which for some reason is considered to be "Tufts' Drinking Culture". They're hoping to solve a nationwide problem, one that is deeply seated in the nation's culture, with (counter)programming options?I mean, with all the surveys and studies Tufts conducts on the subject, when is the administration going to recognize the data showing that prohibitionist measures only STRENGTHEN what they choose to inhibit? What has been shown to work, instead, is actually the same pressures that influence (notice I didn't use the word "cause"- we're not dealing with robots here) students to drink on campuses around the country. If the social pressure is NOT to drink, then students are much less likely to engage in this behavior. The problem is bringing about this change in culture, which up to this point has been attempted through flawed authoritarian measures.I am an Italian-American and I think Italian culture is an excellent example of what I'm talking about, both in its manifestation and in its general perception by Americans. Italy is known for having some of the best alcoholic products in the world (wine) and these products are not only a large part of the culture, but have even become somewhat symbolic of the national culture to foreigners. However, I constantly encounter incredulity and shock when my wife and I inform people that not only does she not drink, but she hates the taste of wine! "But you're Italian!" they often exclaim, as if the abundant availability of a delicious intoxicant MUST lead to consumptive habits. No, my wife is not even an exception to a rule, but rather a very common member of a fairly large demographic in Italy. She has no moral qualms about drinking in general (in fact she will sometimes have a nice "Bailey's on the Rocks"), she just doesn't have much motivation to drink heavily, if at all, and she’s not alone; many of my friends and family in Italy have similar behaviors. Why, in a culture of rich alcoholic tradition (the chemical-kind, not the disease-kind) do these seeming paradoxes exist? Well, it certainly wasn’t a governmental edict that instilled these practices. My opinion is that people such as my wife only SEEM to be paradoxical according to the prevailing American logic which, I think most will agree, can be summed up as "if alcohol is available then people, especially young people (who lack common sense) will consume as much as possible". This indeed seems, to me, to be the prevailing attitude of many administrations in the U.S, legal and non. Granted, the Tufts administration does have the added pressure from the law weighing on them, but why do they need to do the work of the police? Why does the school administration need to become an added enforcement arm of the state? I don’t think that the school does, in fact, have any obligation to enforce state law on such a detailed level (actively searching for and removing alcohol from students, enforcing severe punishments for alcohol related offences, etc). Stated simply, the University has no theoretical legal obligation to force students to comply with the law, but rather, its basic responsibility is, instead, to neither condone nor allow illegal activity to occur. This is a fine line to be walked for sure, and it requires both dialogue and creative and informative programming and policy formation to enact, however Tufts (as well as other administrations in the U.S.) follows a much less subtle plan of action, hoping instead to subdue the student population into compliance. This always comes from one basic (and flawed) assumption: “Young people do not have the capability to drink responsibly. Given the opportunity, they will consume as much alcohol as possible risking both their health and the status of the respective institution charged with guarding their safety. Therefore, they must be prevented from drinking or they will be a liability to the institution and to themselves”. Tufts fears being viewed as a facilitator of illegal activity (underage drinking) and at the same time has to respond to an overwhelming amount of pressure from American youth culture which insists upon drinking. Let’s look back at Italian culture: Why aren’t all Italians raging alcoholics if alcohol has a prominent role in their culture? Well, the culture of Italian wine (and other spirits) is one of refined taste and appreciation, not wanton consumption. Getting a little tipsy IS part of enjoying alcoholic beverages, but those who over-imbibe are viewed as lacking self-control and proper manners. In other words, it’s not “cool” in Italy to be absolutely wasted, and it is especially not cool to brag about how wasted you are/were on a particular night. Social pressure easily and more effectively accomplishes...
Your name
Thu Nov 19 2009 11:53
"Hey, you can't bring up the frats! They do nominal community service!"

I'm not sure why you think frat boys should be personally responsible for curbing binge drinking.

Your name
Thu Nov 19 2009 11:30
I think that removing alcohol from fraternity parties would actually just cause the majority of students to find other parties. Sticky, smelly buildings full of grab-assers aren't as fun without free booze.
blah
Thu Nov 19 2009 11:29
I agree that a fraternities appear to strangely be some of the "safer" drinking venues. They have a lot to lose if (when) things go wrong
Your name
Thu Nov 19 2009 11:07
One student did bring up the fraternities as a popular venue for getting alcohol and a major source of the problem. I personally countered that argument as the fraternities are always very aware of what is being served and to whom it is being served. It is in their best interest to avoid serving alcohol to people that are too drunk. If anything removing alcohol from fraternity parties only makes the situation more dangerous by increasing the pregaming that students will do before they go to the parties. If they know they can't get beer at the party they'll drink lots of hard alcohol before going to the party, arrive at the party fine, enter the party and then once inside they start having medical issues. And the fraternity is still responsible for them even if they didn't serve them anything.

I also pointed out at the meeting that the role of fraternities in the drinking culture was an important aspect of the recent TCU Senate survey for which I was personally responsible. Everyone should complete the survey so that we can have the most accurate results and can provide real statistics to accompany this discussion.

Your name
Thu Nov 19 2009 10:40
Hey, you can't bring up the frats! They do nominal community service!
anonymous alumnus
Thu Nov 19 2009 09:48
I'm curious to know if the town hall discussed the fraternity aspect of the drinking culture. I missed the meeting, but would like to know what was said on the subject.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In