Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Nealley delays guilty plea

Published: Friday, May 8, 2009

Updated: Saturday, May 9, 2009 02:05

Nealley in Court

Meredith Klein / Tufts Daily

Jodie Nealley sits in court surrounded by her supporters.

A last-minute motion today breathed new life into Jodie Nealley's legal proceedings, even as onlookers dotted a Woburn courtroom expecting to hear a guilty plea.

During closed-door proceedings at the Middlesex County Superior Court, Attorney Howard Lewis convinced a judge to order a pre-sentence investigation to determine whether Nealley, his client, can avoid incarceration.

As a result, Lewis decided to withhold entering a guilty plea for Nealley until the next court date, which was scheduled today for June 11. At that time, Nealley will also receive her sentence.

While Lewis and Attorney Steven Goldwyn, who represents Ray Rodriguez, conferenced today with Judge Sandra Hamlin, both Rodriguez and Nealley sat waiting in the courtroom.

Flanked by her son, her spouse and a handful of friends from Gamblers Anonymous, Nealley sat toward the front of the room, occasionally tearing up as she chatted with her supporters.

Rodriguez, meanwhile, sat alone in the back, arms crossed and eyes averted. Unlike Nealley, Rodriguez has not publicly indicated whether or not he will change the not-guilty plea he made in August; both he and Goldwyn declined to comment today.

Nealley, the former director of student activities, and Rodriguez, her former coworker, are charged with stealing a combined total of nearly $1 million from the university in separate schemes.

Until earlier this week, neither had offered any public explanation for their alleged involvement in the embezzlement scandal. But on Wednesday, Lewis told the Daily that Nealley took over $300,000 from the university to feed a gambling addiction.

As part of today's agreement, an officer from the court's Probation Department will interview Nealley and her family and submit a report to Hamlin.

The officer will look to determine whether Nealley is a suitable candidate to receive probation rather than time behind bars. Hamlin will take the report into consideration when she sentences Nealley.

"[This] gives Probation time to meet with Jodie and her son and her spouse and see where she lives and see if there's something they can do besides putting her in jail," Lewis told the Daily.

Currently, Middlesex County District Attorney Gerry Leone's office is requesting three years of incarceration for Nealley, but according to Lewis, "that's not going to happen."

While Lewis is seeking probation, at Tufts, the administration appears to favor a harsher sentence.

"I think that the university feels that this crime deserves a punishment that reflects the impact that it had on the university community, and jail time would be appropriate," Senior University Counsel Dickens Mathieu told the Daily today.

Mathieu, who was expecting a guilty plea, was at court today on behalf of Tufts and was prepared to read a victim impact statement. But as a result of the motion, he will delay presenting it until June 11.

Lewis countered that jail time would not be useful in this case. "Putting her in jail will cost the commonwealth a lot of money, and it's not going to do any good," he said.

After their court appearance, both Nealley and Rodriguez filled out forms that are the first step in setting up an interview with the Probation Department. As a condition of today's arrangement, the Probation Department will also conduct a pre-sentencing investigation for Rodriguez, even as it remains unclear if he is bracing himself for a trial.

As they handled the paperwork, Rodriguez was unaccompanied, while Nealley, who declined to comment, left the courthouse surrounded by her supporters.

"She's very emotional," Lewis said. "Above all else, she's embarrassed and she feels horrible about how she let down Tufts."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments Log in to Comment

t
Wed Jun 3 2009 15:16
Are they making ANY effort to recoup some of the ill-gotten gains????
Annonymous
Tue Jun 2 2009 22:44
It never amazes me of the stories I hear regarding Tufts..I was a long standing loyal employee of 25 years who LOST her job almost 5 years ago with NO warning, no verbal or written warning of any kind because of a director and new supervisor who felt I should be let go..I NEVER TOOK ANYTHING FROM TUFTS AND GAVE 100% FOR 25 YEARS.....WHERE IS THE JUSTICE HERE????
Your name
Sat May 16 2009 21:14
I like how since she's an educated white woman, homosexual or not, who worked in a well-regarded position for many years that it's even an option that she might not go to jail. Any young black man would be in jail right now, no questions. I agree with the commenter who said that jail won't do any good, but that's because it's not rehabilitative in nature, I don't care what anyone says. If you want to take into account how her family will be affected by this, you need to use that mindset with every single case that goes through the courts; furthermore, she maybe should have taken that into consideration before she went through with her actions. Regardless, it's called justice and it's called being fair across the board. I don't care what circumstances were involved, she took money from Tufts University that students paid for activities and used it for her own personal use. She deserves the same sentence anyone else would get.
Ruth Burnham,'72
Mon May 11 2009 17:31
I'm sorry it's come to this for Jodie, a former colleague.
Beedy
Mon May 11 2009 10:27
as the old saying goes,,, if you can't do the time, don't do the crime. Give them both 3 years in the pen, plus a hefty fine. The punishment should fit the cime.
Your name
Mon May 11 2009 01:19
I don't really see the good that it does to put Ms. Nealley in jail. I still that repayment of the money, a hefty fine, attendance at a gamblers anon meeting and perhaps some community service would be more appropriate. She is not dangerous. I understand the punitive and deterent elements of incarceration but putting her in jail means her son has one less parent, her household has one less earner and I cannot imagine how there would be any benefit to her spending 3 years in jail.
OlderThanDirt
Sun May 10 2009 12:56
The real question is whether Rodriguez, apparently a socially isolated person, will receive the same penalty as Mrs. Neally, who enjoys a strong and vocal support network. Letting her off more lightly than her codefendant would be an abuse of both process and justice. There are also important gender equity issues at stake here. Is a woman entitled to a lighter sentence for an equal crime? Most women would, I believe, say yes. That is the principle element of re-education that needs to take place here. And by the way, the state of Massachusetts officially sponsors a gambling lottery while the Governor backs a proposal apparently supported by the majority of the state's population to create three centralized gambling destinations within the Commonwealth. Under such circumstances the state presumptively choosesNOT to recognize the existence of a condition known as "gambling addiction." Legally such a defense--or, more accurately, mitigation factor—should be irrelevant.
Your name
Sat May 9 2009 15:10
Can't wait for them to throw Ray's fat ass in jail.
David
Sat May 9 2009 14:28
"Lewis countered that jail time would not be useful in this case. “Putting her in jail will cost the commonwealth a lot of money, and it’s not going to do any good,” he said."

Jail doesn't do anybody good. That's not the point. It's about punishment. This woman stole over 300,000 dollars, and we are supposed to give her a slap on the wrist? She should go to prison. I'm glad the university is pushing for some sort of justice in this case.

Your name
Sat May 9 2009 01:54
Seriously dude, it's time. Let the Daily go. Have fun. Someone else can do the reporting. In fact, someone else NEEDS to.
Your name
Fri May 8 2009 23:23
rob, time to graduate!

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In