Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Senate passes record budget, cuts ticket costs

Boston Bus Shuttle out, buffer funding slashed for fiscal year 2010

Published: Monday, April 6, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, April 7, 2009 12:04

sen

Dilys Ong/Tufts Daily

The Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate cut prices as part of the largest-ever TCU budget.

Document | The TCU Senate's Budget Proposal

Scroll through the document above to see a Tufts Community Union Senate summary of its record-setting budget, which passed this weekend. Full story

The Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate on Sunday approved a $1,394,300 budget for fiscal year 2010, the largest passed in the Senate's history and one that entirely eliminated ticket costs on campus.

The budget is roughly $200,000 bigger than past budgets, according to TCU Treasurer Matt Shapanka.

"It's the largest budget we've ever had, and by a significant amount," TCU President Duncan Pickard said yesterday, a day after the Senate's last meeting of the academic year.

The budget's exceptional size is largely a result of the doing away with ticket costs at student organization events.

In an effort to reduce student expenses at Tufts, the Senate will cover the expected revenue from ticketed events by paying student organizations in advance the amounts that would have otherwise come in through ticket sales.

The impact of this decision accounted for roughly $58,000 of the budget's increase, according to Shapanka, a senior.

Tufts students next year will not have to pay for tickets to on-campus events both sponsored and performed by TCU-recognized groups; the events must be open to all Tufts undergraduates. The change targets culture and arts performances by student groups, and does not include events by outside performers like last month's Jumbo Jam concert.

Pickard, a junior, said the end to ticket prices aims to address the financial burdens placed on students by costs not necessarily covered by financial aid or other means.

"I think that Tufts is doing a much better job of opening the doors of the university to students" from different socioeconomic backgrounds, he said. "But just because more students are here doesn't mean they can afford to take advantage of everything that's offered on campus."

The Senate, and Pickard in particular, has pushed for this change all year, at first looking into whether spending the recovered funds on this initiative would work.

"We were always thinking about ways that we could do this," Pickard said.

Including it in the budget, he said, could make it easier to become sustainable in the future.

The Senate discussed the proposal at its meeting last Sunday, voting 25-1-1 to tentatively move forward with plans.

In order to remain fiscally balanced while eliminating ticket costs, the Senate sacrificed in other areas.

Senators got rid of the Boston Bus Shuttle, almost entirely cut buffer funding available to student groups and cut the salaries of the TCU president and treasurer by more than half, Shapanka said.

Slashing the amount of buffer funding available means that student groups will have a harder time receiving extra funds from the Senate to cover unforeseen expenses next year.

The Senate will still have the option, however, to allocate next year's surplus to buffer funding. Each year, student groups generally spend $100,000 to $150,000 less than they are budgeted for, according to Pickard.

Next year's treasurer will be able to move that funding to the buffer fund. Shapanka said that that surplus amount is not guaranteed by any means, though.

A number of senators have questioned whether this new policy is sustainable or will adversely affect student groups who are in need of supplementary funds.

Shapanka said that while he was in favor of the cut in principle, it might not carry over to future budgets.

"I don't think our ability to pay for it is sustainable," he said.

He added that no student group was consulted before ticket costs were slashed. In addition, he said, he believes the Senate needs to have a discussion about its priorities.

Pickard remained optimistic, however, about the budget's model.

"There are some questions about whether this is sustainable, about whether this model that we set up is going to take place, or whether this surplus is going be exhausted," he said. "I think this is something that looks promising, and if there is any year to try it out, this is the year because we have so much extra money."

Next year's budget will consist of $123,557 for the cultural groups, $585,911 for social programming, $153,063 for media groups, $88,489 for religious groups, $100,319 for performance groups, $115,528 for miscellaneous and community expenses, $39,203 for academic and pre-professional groups, $26,676 for political groups, $160,661 for the TCU government and $890 for the buffer fund.

The Senate considered and voted on each category separately. Each clearly passed by a voice vote.

Eliminating ticket costs on campus is just one example of Senate initiatives to reduce student costs on campus.

The Senate last Sunday unanimously passed a resolution aimed at reducing the costs of textbooks. It encouraged faculty members to take certain measures to reduce the burden placed on students.

"[B]ooks are the single greatest out-of-pocket expenditure to students," read the resolution, submitted by the Senate's Services Committee.

If students were given notice about which books particular classes require further in advance, it stated, they could purchase those books for less money from Web sites such as Amazon.com.

The resolution recommended that teachers refrain from requiring new editions of textbooks, which often cost significantly more and have relatively few changes from older editions.

It also advised faculty to post online lists of required books along with international standard book numbers (ISBNs) when course offerings are made.

Shapanka said that, overall, reducing costs where possible has been a priority.

"The Senate is really committed to reducing the cost of attending Tufts and incidental costs and barriers to social and academic life," he said.

Ben Gittleson contributed reporting to this article.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

12 comments Log in to Comment

Your name
Wed Apr 8 2009 22:47
http://senate.tufts.edu/downloads/908_tcu_operations_fy09.pdf

That tells you how much they get paid.

AS
Wed Apr 8 2009 00:24
No senators get paid a salary. (Although at other schools, the treasurer is paid because it is a very time consuming job) The money is the TCU government fund goes towards some Senate sponsored events, office costs, etc. You can look it up line by line in the budget. It is entirely transparent.
Your name
Tue Apr 7 2009 22:19
I, too, wonder about the salaries for the TCU president and treasurer! What do they get paid?!
poor kid
Tue Apr 7 2009 20:12
Stop whining about the ticket prices. Its unsustainable for the inequality gap at Tufts to be perpetuated by charging 8 -12 dollars for events when kids can barely afford to buy books. Student groups will just have to learn to do more with less. As far as the TMC house goes - Elliot is right, the thing is a damn joke. It doesn't affect the broad Tufts community enough to justify spending $230,000 on a new "sleeping house". If you care about buffer funding - thats the thing to attack.
Sophomore Senator
Tue Apr 7 2009 19:26
As the one person in the Senate who voted against these budgets (25-1), I too share the concern about reducing the buffer fund in order to cut ticket costs. I completely understand the importance of reducing costs on campus (as I chaired the an ad-hoc committee titled the Task Force on the Financial Crisis), but the Senate did so in a terribly irresponsible way. It is not sustainable. I was responsible for budgeting Council IV, the religious groups, and I could not even vote in favor of those budgets because of how irresponsible I felt the vote to cut ticket costs was.
Chris W.
Tue Apr 7 2009 16:42
This is ridiculous. $890 is a joke. The $230,000 given to the TMC could have been used as a buffer fund. The fact that the administration allowed the Senate to eliminate this fund is unconscionable. The Senate needs some oversight from real adults as this juvenile spending spree is fiscal irresponsibility at its worst.
(it didn't post my name the first time)
Your name
Tue Apr 7 2009 16:40
This is ridiculous. $890 is a joke. The $230,000 given to the TMC could have been used as a buffer fund. The fact that the administration allowed the Senate to eliminate this fund is unconscionable. The Senate needs some oversight from real adults as this juvenile spending spree is fiscal irresponsibility at its worst.
Your name
Tue Apr 7 2009 16:20
the tcu has a surplus to which student groups can appeal for additional funding.
Your name
Tue Apr 7 2009 15:19
Budgets live online. Check senate.tufts.edu/treasury -- you can see how every student group, including the Senate, spends its money.
Your name
Tue Apr 7 2009 13:49
Wait, the TCU president and treasurer get salaries? How much are they paid?
Your name
Tue Apr 7 2009 13:22
Why on earth do the Treasurer and President have salaries that come out of our pocket? And what on earth is this $160,661 for "TCU Government." How do they spend that money?!
M.S.
Tue Apr 7 2009 12:02
By effectively removing buffer funding ("$890 for the buffer fund") the Senate has done a great disservice to the Tufts Community. Without this funding to support initiatives, unplanned expenses, and mid-year projects student groups will be more limited than ever before. Already student group budgets have suffered due to the recent fiscal crisis. Now without consultation they are having an initiative forced on them? I am appalled.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In