Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Students in Experimental College class want Tufts to go ‘paperless’

Published: Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Updated: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 08:03

Eaton Printers

Scott Tingley/Tufts Daily

Students in an ExCollege class are pushing for printers that print double-sided by default.

Tufts' latest environmental campaign, led by students in the Experimental College (ExCollege) class Environmental Action: Shifting from Saying to Doing, is trying to change campus culture in regard to paper waste.

While members of the class last semester focused on the issue of trays in the dining halls, this semester, students have turned their attention to paper usage at Tufts.

Tufts' Medford/Somerville campus in 2008 bought 221,844 lbs of paper, 70 percent of which was virgin paper — paper made without any recycled content — according to Project Coordinator of the Office of Sustainability and an instructor for the course Tina Woolston.

"That amount of paper translates to about 2,662 trees or nearly three football fields of green space," Woolston said.

The class is working with on-campus environmental groups such as Tufts Recycles!, Tufts Institute of the Environment (TIE) and the Office of Sustainability in an effort to reduce Tufts' paper use, according to freshman Danielle Jenkins, who is a student in the class.

"We are encouraging professors to accept papers electronically and use fewer handouts," Jenkins said. "[We] are working to change the default printer settings in Tisch and Eaton to double-sided as well as to reduce the amount of virgin paper that Tufts uses."

The goal is to transform the norm from being environmentally unfriendly to being more sustainable, according to Dallase Scott, a graduate student in the Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning program who co-teaches the class.

"People usually act out of convenience and do not realize their choices are made through what is already the default," Scott said. "In our society, the default is not environmentally friendly. It takes a small group of people to work to change the default to greener policies."

Scott added that while conserving paper is a good exercise, the larger goal is to create a culture at Tufts in which people expect sustainable practices.

Students in the class have been meeting with the administration, library staff, faculty members, campus environmental groups and students in order to discover the best ways to reduce Tufts' paper trail, according to Jenkins.

"In order to change the infrastructure, we need to do research," Jenkins said. "We have looked at similar efforts at Harvard and [Massachusetts Institute of Technology] and have tried to model our campaign after them."

Both Jenkins and Scott claimed that support for the movement was relatively strong.

One of the major components of the campaign is encouraging professors to use less paper. Both the Community Health Program and the Environmental Studies Program have agreed to participate in a trial that would require faculty to accept papers online, according to Woolston.

She added that the switch from Blackboard Academic Suite to a better online educational platform — which is in the works — might make it easier to reduce paper usage through improved editing and file-sharing functions.

The campaign also centers on making the default setting for all printers on campus double-sided printing, although this has run into a few technical difficulties.

Woolston explained that there are currently two different contracts for multifunction printers on campus. One is for printers in staff and faculty offices and the other for printers that charge money, such as those in Tisch Library and Eaton Computer Lab. As of last year, staff and faculty printers were set to a double-sided default while all other printers remained with a single-sided default.

The real challenge, however, lies in inspiring the campus to be proactive about saving paper. According to Scott, this means increasing manpower at the Office of Sustainability and increasing funding for student projects directed at environmental change.

"The administration has done a great job in creating green buildings, composting and recycling, but what we really need is a larger staff to get students involved and create change," Scott said.

Jenkins said that the effort to reduce paper use at Tufts is not only a practical step to make the university more sustainable but is also instrumental in instilling green habits in students.

Rather than merely discussing environmental policy, students in the ExCollege class study behavioral approaches to change and their own individual impact on the environment with the goal of empowering their peers to adopt greener practices.

"A lot of the time, people follow by example and don't recycle because they don't feel obligated to," Jenkins said. "We need a good example that people can follow to become greener citizens."

Students in the class keep weekly blogs to reflect on the personal challenges they face in the paper-reduction campaign, as well as to practice effective activism and communication, according to Scott.

"By getting students to look at their personal action and teaching them not only information, but how to communicate with peers and administrators and how to be proactive, we motivate them to be examples in their community," Scott said. "Environmental issues can seem daunting, and the only way to create change is to empower people."

Scott cited her time teaching environmental classes in the Peace Corps as instrumental in helping her realize the importance of changing the infrastructure of an institution in order to cement green policies.

"I was able to see the change in my students and saw it spread to the entire community," Scott said. "Change is possible if you give people enough personal power. Campaigns are great, but you need to make these initiatives a part of the campus so it will be sustainable in the future."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

12 comments Log in to Comment

katie
Thu Mar 18 2010 11:15
Sheesh people!
take time to read the article before you start complaining about things that were never even mentioned. Quotas for example...not in the article.
It sounds to me that people in that ex-college class take time to do research and are able to have a valid argument.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 22:58
Just because you're reading about it on the front page of the Daily doesn't mean it's "wide, sweeping changes" And at least you're hearing about it beforehand, which is more than can be said for many other changes on campus.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 22:57
It doesn't say here that the students are campaigning for quotas or forcing people to stop using paper - just pushing to allow students to turn in assignments on-line and have professors allow students to turn in double-sided papers if they wish.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 22:46
You might be interested to know that this is an entirely different group of students from the trayless campaign.
Siegfried
Wed Mar 17 2010 16:47
I agree with this initiative and have been advocating for the same position for quite some time, albeit for different reasons. It's a shame that this group has already lost its credibility with most people as a result of the ridiculous trayless jibberjabber.
Tyler
Wed Mar 17 2010 15:56
I'm with Bruce on this one. We do waste a lot of paper and we could save some trees by being more efficient.

But a quota is the wrong way to go.

I'm also glad the Daily has decided to tackle our excessive paper usage by not printing thousands of copies of their newspaper that won't get read...oh wait...

Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 15:32
If you've read the full article, you'll see that the class does not want Tufts to go "paperless" as was misconstrued in the title, but wants to reduce paper use with easy, convenient methods.

Wouldn't you rather submit something online than go through the hassle of printing it and turning in a hard copy? And is having a default setting of double-sided printing in the library really going to affect you if your professors accept assignments double-sided? You can still change it to single sided if you really need.

I'm totally in support of this movement and I really don't understand the backlash.

AB
Wed Mar 17 2010 15:11
Let's go student-less!!!!
Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 13:28
I'm pretty sure they don't actually want to get rid of paper.

I would be in favor of:
- Double sided printing being cheaper
- Fewer posters being allocated by Senate
- Better online collaboration (but they're already working on that)

Paperless, lol

Allie
Wed Mar 17 2010 11:56
Students would riot if this happened. When BU changed it's printing quota to 100 pages per semester, there was/is non stop whining and complaining. I agree that printed material should be double sided and that people should be encouraged to use less paper overall, but eliminating it completely would not end well.
Bruce Ratain
Wed Mar 17 2010 11:35
Whats next, if we're honest, is going treeless. While I think that the classes' idea of going entirely paperless is not necessarily feasible, there are measures that can be taken. One example that I have been thinking about (I'm not in the class) is reducing flyering around campus--contracting our environmental impact, while still allowing groups to properly advertise events. There are a bunch of things that we currently do that are wholly excessive, and it doesnt, nor should it have to require fundamental, sweeping changes to make an impact.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 17 2010 10:52
you have GOT to be kidding me. What is next? "Experimental College Class Wants Tufts To Go Toilet Paper-less?"

If you wanted to be this "green" you should have went to the College of the Atlantic, Evergreen or Antioch.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In