Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Op-Ed | Blackness, Palestine, solidarity: A call for a critical love ethic

Published: Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Updated: Wednesday, March 6, 2013 09:03


 

The story of the African Diaspora’s journey from the bondages of the Atlantic to the post-racialist age of Obama is a topic of critical discussion in many anti-racist communities, a point of pride for neo-liberal allies and a rallying cry for those currently pondering the efficacy of race-based remedies for problems based in historical (and present) white supremacist policies. For me and many of my African-American peers, our history functions on an axis. It is simultaneously a painful pressure point and a source of unspeakable pride and joy. Our histories of oppressions and strategic survival bind us together like the hermetic locks of our Ashanti, Maasai, Yoruba and Mau Mau ancestors. Each day as we live and breathe we carry with us the revolutionary rage of Nat Turner and Angela Davis, the intellectual prowess of Dubois, Douglass and Kimberlé Crenshaw, the strategic acuity of Tubman and Malcolm and the empowering love ethics of Ella Baker, Fannie Lou and bell hooks. The lesson of our histories is one of community, love, resistance and radical solidarity.

The quest for Black liberation in the United States was aided by white allies, Jewish-Americans in particular. Thurgood Marshall, the first black Supreme Court Justice and lead litigator in Brown v. Board of Education, routinely recalled the assistance and support he received from his middle-class Jewish neighbors. The history of Black Americans and Jewish Americans is storied, well documented and an important part of the Civil Rights Movement. Many young Jewish college students participated in the freedom rides down South to participate in sit-ins, marches and other demonstrations. Jewish youth routinely put their bodies and privilege on the line to stand in solidarity against the interconnected systems of racism, classism, nativism, anti-Semitism, fundamental anti-blackness and white supremacy that defined the Black and Jewish experiences in America. As a young Black male who benefited greatly from the coalitions before and during the Civil Rights Movement, I would be remiss without recounting the ways in which our Jewish brothers and sisters have assisted in our historic, shared fights for liberation and human dignity.

Just as the relationship between Jewish Americans and African Americans was based in a fundamental understanding and experience of racial and ethnic subordination, so too is the relationship between the African and Palestinian diasporas. Our lives are similarly defined, redefined and experienced through the systemic maldistribution of material resources and inequitable access to sociopolitical power(s). Our ancestors have both experienced the traumas of violent, forced immigration from lands we have historically called home. Palestinians continue to exist through deep resistance in what Angela Davis has called the “largest open-air prison” in the world. They are policed, profiled and subordinated through terroristic, violent lessons of racialized comportment. According to Alice Walker, “Going through Israeli checkpoints is like going back in time to [the] American Civil Rights struggle.” As a Black man, in the present age, I will never understand the physical and psychological traumas of a Palestinian brother at an Israeli checkpoint. However, my experiences with police and racial profiling and the real threat of being assassinated for walking while black, or wearing a hoodie, or appearing too aggressive allow me to retain a deep empathy for his experience. As I mourn the murders of Trayvon Martin and Jordan Davis, I must also grieve for the lives Samir Ahmad Abdul-Rahim and Mohammed Salayme. For too many young men and women of color, survival itself is a revolutionary act of resistance.

To be born Palestinian is to be legally marked as inherently violent, indisputably dangerous and a necessary gudgeon for the peace and calm of “civilized” society. Put simply, the Palestinian body has been constructed as the threat to Israeli society, creating a state of vast acceptance and normalization of the current state-sanctioned system of racial apartheid that has displaced millions of Palestinian bodies. Just as nearly 600,000 Black and Latino young men are routinely harassed by police under the pretenses of New York City’s “stop and frisk” policy, millions of Palestinian people are terrorized for drifting too far from the walls of an open-air prison. In both cases, data shows that the “threat” is rarely material but, instead, psychological. These systems of racial “othering” continually create imputed images of people of color as inherently threatening and dangerous. This internal logic equates Black and Palestinian existences. This logic paves the way for violent and strictly enforced racist policies. In short, these policies enhance, benefit and reify the power and humanity of one racial group at the expense of the other.

Let me be clear, however, my criticism is not one of hate or malice toward individual Israelis but instead a critical analysis of the powers and effects of settler colonialism, racial subordination, Zionism and controlling images that allow such bloodshed to continue unabated. The issue here is not the rational fear of the Israeli man or woman who recalls the horrors of their history, but instead the ways in which state policies have perpetuated racial subordination and violent trauma through the molestation of the bloody chronicle of Jewish death and survival, all in the name of peace and safety. We cannot protect ourselves, our essence, or our humanity from systemic violence with systemic violence. Instead, we must adopt a critical love ethic of universal liberation from cyclical and systemic violence and oppression.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments Log in to Comment

Arafat
Fri Mar 8 2013 19:36
youtube.com/watch?v=hwdYRrWAB9E
Arafat
Fri Mar 8 2013 19:35
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwdYRrWAB9E
Arafat
Fri Mar 8 2013 19:35
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hwdYRrWAB9E
Larry A. Singleton
Fri Mar 8 2013 18:14
I tried posting this elsewhere. Didn't seem to have much luck. Of course I'm not that savy when if comes to this here Internet thing.I read a book "Rivers of Blood-Years of Darkness" when I was a nigger hating sixteen year old who used to get jumped on a regular basis by your "poor and oppressed black brothers." trying to turn me into road kill evey chance they got. I guess it was just a "black thang". Like those "mobs" no one talks about. One day I grew up. Hopefully you will too.Letter to Martha Shanahan and Company 3-8-13I just read Martha Shanahan's tirade on David Horowitz's Anti-Apartheid ad. (and Munir Atalla's rant about Israel being an "Apartheid State". I was deeply encouraged by the comments below that reflected the truth of the matter. Truth be told South African Apartheid would be a breath of fresh air compared to what's been happening under Islam.) The really dispicable thing is what's not said in her letter and that's her and her paper's promotion of Jew-Hatred and Jew-Genocide which is all this Israel Apartheid business is all about. I'm going to put a list of books at the end of this and some links but what I'd like to do first and foremost is recommend that everybody read "The Haj" by Leon Uris. This book was the "light bulb" that went on in my head when it came to "that Middle East thing".I was practically shaking when I finished Shanahan's "letter". I almost couldn't finish it. It was that difficult to read. This person has not one iota of knowledge of history otherwise she wouldn't come off sounding like the fascist mouthpiece that she did; Did you notice? Did you notice that she did not detail one single thing in that "blatently defamatory" ad. She did not quote one single thing from the ad as an example of so-called "hate-speech".I've been studying this issue for the last few years and I can tell you right now this gal "fits the pattern"... ...of those I've seen who write on sites like LoonWatch, (Which I'll bet my bottom dollar that Useful Idiot Atalla subscribes to.), and the Huffington Post. Truly, they'll take up pages and pages and pages with their hysterical screeds and, like her "Op-Ed", not say One Single Thing of any substance.Let's look at the ad... ...hell let's just quote from Daniel Greenfield;Daniel Greenfield A Double Standard On Hatehttp://www.huntingtonnews.net/56983"If the advertisement was wrong, then there would have been no need to censor it. False claims can easily be disproven. Five minutes with Google would have told every reader and editor whether there was any truth to the Faces of Islamic Apartheid." "It is never necessary to censor lies. It is only necessary to censor truth.""That is why the majority of campus papers -- ten so far, including Harvard whose editors said they would not print it under any circumstances -- refused to run this paid advertisement. It is why those few who did have begun making ritual apologies while lying about its contents." "It is why the attacks on the advertisement have taken refuge in vague platitudes about offensiveness, without a single attempt at a factual rebuttal." "It is why every response to the advertisement has consisted of claiming that speaking about Islamic bigotry is the real bigotry" I'm just a dumb-ass construction worker. I'm not college egecated like Shanahan. But thank God I love to read. It's really to laugh when I read people like Shanahan talk about racism and bigotry. They wouldn't know racism and bigotry if it came up and slapped them in the face. Sometimes I wonder if only people like me, ex nigger-haters and reformed racists can really understand racism. I was about as close to being a member of the Ku Klux Klan as you can be without actually being one. Admitingly even then, I recognized them for the clowns that they were. Maybe that's what inspired me to read "Black Like Me", "Rivers of Blood-Years of Darkness", "The Autobiography of Malcolm X" and "The Man" among about a dozen others like them when I was sixteen and getting jumped on a regular basis by "those fuckin' niggers" at Fremont Junior High in Muscoy; Affectionately known to all us boys on "The Hill" as the Gladiator School in "Little Africa". Actually, even though he doesn't know it, it was Dennis Overton who inspired me to read those books. (Whose brother was one of those who used to jump me.); I invite those who are inclined to read my work in progress. My "Racism Speech" and "My Thoughts On Jihad" in my Facebook Notes. (It's interesting, I sent this letter to about half a dozen "Black" newspapers in the spirit of "Human Relations" and only got back one response; which totally missed the point.)Israels "Crime" is trying to survive the total annihilation by the Arabs and thousands of years of persecution and massacres. Please deny that Jew Hatred is taught to every "Palestinian" or Arab with their mothers milk. Please deny that the state of "Israel" doesn't even exist for Palestinian school children who are taught with maps of...
Arafat
Thu Mar 7 2013 12:38
• There is no "Palestine". There might have been, but they chose war instead- time and again:
The would-have-been "Palestinians" would have had a state IN PEACE in 1937 with the Peel Plan, but they violently rejected it.
.
They would have had a state IN PEACE in 1939 with the MacDonald White Paper, but they violently rejected it (and Jews would have even been restricted from BUYING land from Arabs).
They would have had a state IN PEACE in 1948 with UN 181, but they violently rejected it (and actually claimed that the UN had no such mandate!).
.
They could have had a state IN PEACE in Judea, Samaria, and Gaza from 1948-1967 without any Jews- because the Arabs had ethnically cleansed every last one; but they violently rejected it. In fact, that's exactly when they established Fatah (1959) and the PLO (1964).
.
They could have had a state IN PEACE after 1967, but instead, the entire Arab world issued the Khartoum Resolutions:
A. No peace with Israel
B. No recognition of Israel
C. No negotiations with Israel

They would have had a state IN PEACE in 2000 with the Oslo Accords, but they violently rejected it- as always.
And as soon as Israel pulled every single Israeli out of Gaza, what did the would-have-been "Palestinians" do? They immediately started shooting thousands of missiles into Israeli population centers, they elected Hamas (whose official platform calls for jihad with no negotiations until Israel is destroyed) to rule them, and they have dug tunnels crossing into the Negev to kill and kidnap Israelis.

And even afterwards, Ehud Olmert made his subsequent generous offer that went far beyond even that of Barak. The would-have-been "Palestinians" rejected it.

They had many chances.

They threw them all away because destroying Israel was higher on their priority list. It still is.

Oh well. That's their choice.

Mehta
Wed Mar 6 2013 17:50
I didn't know Jewish-Americans historically helped Blacks in their fight for equality. After watching some Farrakhan I was convinced of the opposite... now I don't know what to think

I liked this line:
"We must look deeply and examine the oppressor within, dare to love those who we see as threats or "other" and question whether the threat is real, imagined or internal"
because the situation involves such long-standing mutual hatred, and things will only continue to worsen so long as each side justifies its own inciting behaviors as a natural, necessary response to the behavior of the other. Of course neither side has the impetus to make the first move, to "dare to love," for fear of rejection and the disastrous consequences that would follow. I wonder what kind of impetus is needed for one side to break the cycle of violence, since the hatred exists between the powerful men and the victims are the powerless subordinates

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In