Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Probation comes easier under new alcohol policy

Reitman: Alcohol abuse ‘out of control’

Published: Sunday, September 13, 2009

Updated: Monday, September 14, 2009 08:09

Office of Student Affairs

Aalok Kanani / Tufts Daily

The Office of Student Affairs will be the sole enforcer of Tufts’ enhanced alcohol policy, in which first-time alcohol policy violators will be put on probation.

In response to rising rates of alcohol-induced student hospitalizations, university administrators have introduced a stricter alcohol policy this semester, speeding up the process that puts underage drinkers on probation.

Underage students who are found in violation of the policy for the first time will be placed under level-one disciplinary probation, or pro-one, in which students' eligibility for things from membership of Greek houses to resident assistantships may be revoked. Last year, first-time violators received only a warning.

The new alcohol policy keeps up last year's "three strikes and you're out" philosophy.

"Do I think that the use of alcohol on campus is out of control?" Dean of Student Affairs Bruce Reitman said. "Yes, I think it is, and we would not be responsible as a community if we did not address dangerous drinking."

Under the new policy, students who commit a second alcohol violation will be placed under level-two disciplinary probation, pro-two, which involves parental notification. Third violations will result in a one-year suspension or forced medical leave from the university.

"While I don't see it as a dramatic policy change, I can see it is as a fundamental change that is important and that needed to happen," Reitman said.

"There is a harder standard, and abusive and dangerous drinking patterns are not going to be ignored in any way," he added. "We cannot have a year like last year when there were close to 100 people taken to the hospital for consuming too much alcohol."

Reitman cited specific alcohol-related incidents for prompting the policy change, including drunken behavior at last year's Winter Bash and the banning of Tufts students from the Museum of Science and certain senior pub night venues for being too drunk. He also cited last year's Spring Fling, which was declared a mass casualty incident after the number of students who needed emergency aid exceeded available resources and over 10 Tufts students were hospitalized for alcohol-related illnesses.

The change in alcohol policy was also made in order to provide further clarification for students. Reitman said that certain aspects of last year's alcohol policy were inconsistent with administrative actions, particularly when students placed on pro-one were told that if they did not contact their parents the university would do so.

"If you look at the different levels of probation, you see that parents are only involved in a situation if it's pro-two," he said. "This wasn't consistent."

Director of Health Education Ian Wong said that he suspects that the change in policy may reduce students' alcohol consumption.

"It might have an impact on campus," Wong said. "Just like any policy, rules always help prevent people from doing things. The alcohol policy is doing that by telling students "this is what you need to do."'

But Wong added that while the policy may help curb drinking on campus, he believes that it is still limited in what it can accomplish.

"The bigger piece here is not the policy, but how we as a community can look out for each other," he said. "We need to look at the certain students who are using alcohol at a dangerous level, and figure out how ... we help other students intervene with those individuals. How do we get more students to watch out for each other?"

Reitman agreed with Wong, calling for a change in social norms on campus.

"I don't think that the fundamental change that is needed is in the rules," he said. "I think that the fundamental change is a cultural one, one that suggests to students that there are more ways to have fun then getting wasted."

While students agreed that drinking plays a large role in college culture, some said that the new policy may deter them from calling Tufts Emergency Medical Services (TEMS).

"I think the alcohol policy might encourage people to be less responsible than last year and might cause harm," sophomore Ryan Long said. "People don't want to get their friends in trouble, and if you automatically go on pro-one when you get caught, people might not call TEMS."

Sophomore Edward Wronsky agreed. "If you make it a bigger penalty for drinking, people will be more opposed to calling TEMS when they really need to."

In order to better monitor students who violate the alcohol policy, administrators have redirected all alcohol cases to the Office of Student Affairs. This is a change from last year, when administrators in the Office of Residential Life and Learning (ResLife) were also charged with disciplining students who violated the alcohol policy.

"It was a matter of pragmatism to have all violations go to one office in order to make sure that communications are clear," Reitman said.

In response to last year's growing trend of alcohol abuse on campus, a student and administrator-run Alcohol and Drug Taskforce was created in the summer to further address these issues. The taskforce will spend the year discussing how to best address Tufts' alcohol-related problems and relay their recommendations to a separate steering committee.

--

Katherine Sawyer contributed reporting to this article.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

7 comments Log in to Comment

Butterfly
Tue Sep 15 2009 21:07
Solution? Don't drink until you black out.
MS
Tue Sep 15 2009 13:07
I can say from experience that the risk of Pro 1 does NOT prevent students from drinking. It just prevents them and their friends from calling TEMS.

I remember once, as I was leaning over a toilet being supported by two friends, saying as my last coherent thought before blacking out, "I already have an alcohol violation, so whatever you do, don't TEMS me." Seemed logical at the time...

alum
Tue Sep 15 2009 12:25
so the cycle goes.... once students stop calling TEMS, and real tragedy strikes, then this policy will be changed- penaties for 1st time infractions have come and gone over the years, no doubt this will be relaxed once again. It was only 3 or 4 years ago that TEMS calls were deemed no longer actionable for disciplinary action; the tide will turn again.

so many of these issues repeat themselves every 4-6 years as new students come through.

Your name
Tue Sep 15 2009 01:07
The fact of the matter is that drinking under 21 is illegal. Just because a student is in college, it should not mean that they deserve insulation from the law. I agree that there may be a few bumps - due to the drinking culture at Tufts, many students who would otherwise not drink (and typically don't after the first few months freshman year) are implicitly peer pressured into doing so. But I think the policy-change is an important one - kudos to Dean Reitman and others that made it happen.
Your name
Mon Sep 14 2009 18:53
Jour name,
Agreed, and for most people, being on Pro-1 won't matter. It's still an official disciplinary action, though, and aspiring lawyers (for example) will have to report it when apply for admission to the bar, regardless of whether it is still on file. So it can be more severe than just a warning.
Jour name
Mon Sep 14 2009 18:25
Hey, Your name, Pro-1 lasts for one year. So if you were on Pro-1 from freshman year, it would be gone by Sophomore year, assuming that you were a good kid.

Pro-2 lasts 4 years out of college.

Your name
Mon Sep 14 2009 15:30
This is outrageous. As an alum who was "busted" freshman year for sipping a beer quietly in a friend's dorm room by an RA who had entered for a separate and, frankly, irrelevant matter, I feel like the warning is a much-needed wake-up call to students before serious action takes place. Had I gone straight to pro-1, that being an official disciplinary measure, that would have followed me around for the rest of my life, especially if I were to take the bar exam or run for public office. This new policy might discourage a few people from picking up their first drink, but it will also encourage those who already drink to take more risks, as the article rightly points out. Time will tell if it reduces hospitalizations, but it will certainly have a negative impact on the reputations of at least a few students who choose to responsibly disregard an outdated minimum drinking age law. The university should continue to discourage excessive drinking, but when it treats all "underage" drinkers equally, the message gets lost. If they really think this policy will lead college students to decide to wait until they turn 21 to taste their first drink, then maybe it's a good idea.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In