College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students Jobs and internships for students -

Rattiner wins TCU presidency

By Ben Gittleson

Print this article

Published: Tuesday, April 28, 2009

Updated: Wednesday, April 29, 2009

rattiner

Alison Mehlsak/ tufts daily

Senator Brandon Rattiner, a junior

brandon

Josh Berlinger | Tufts Daily

Rattiner celebrates with friends after his victory.

Senator Brandon Rattiner won the Tufts Community Union (TCU) presidency yesterday, with Senator Chas Morrison finishing in second place.

Rattiner, who ran a campaign centered on building community, assumed the presidency immediately after the results were certified.

“It’s one of the most exciting moments of my entire life,” Rattiner told the Daily in the early hours of this morning. “I’m honored by the opportunity to represent such an incredible school, and my heart goes out to Chas and Samia because they really ran such wonderful campaigns.”

Students voting for president could choose first and second choices in order to facilitate an instant runoff if needed. Rattiner, a junior, won 47 percent of first-choice ballots; Morrison, a sophomore, received 37 percent of the vote; and 14 percent went to Senator Samia Zahran, a sophomore. Two percent of voters abstained.

No candidate won a majority, so Zahran was eliminated for coming in last place, and an instant runoff took place. With second-choice ballots included this time, Rattiner netted 52 percent of the vote while Morrison received 40 percent.

Yesterday’s ballot also featured two referenda and one “non-binding referendum question.”

A proposal to expand the TCU Constitution’s nondiscrimination policy to include the phrase “gender identity and expression” passed, as did a referendum to add a fifth member to the Elections Committee (ECOM). The ballot question, which asked voters whether the Senate should invest $300,000 worth of recovered funds in the university’s endowment, passed as well.

Morrison remained in good spirits after his loss.

“We ran a great campaign, and I’m just grateful for all my staff and all the volunteers who put in so much time and effort,” he told the Daily. “It was a wonderful experience … And even though things didn’t work out the way I had hoped, I’m looking forward to continuing working on behalf of the student body next year.”

Zahran told the Daily she was glad the election was over.

“I had fun,” she said. “I’m just glad it’s done with. I’m relieved. I am proud of myself because I started so late … I’m just glad that I got people to vote who don’t normally vote.”

She had harsh words for Rattiner, whose supporters she accused of taking down Morrison’s signs the night before and committing other campaign violations.

“I’m just disappointed with Brandon, that’s all,” she said. “He’s immature -- his whole team, in taking down Chas’ posters. I feel like I’m not comfortable with him leading the school, because that shows very poor behavior and a bad attitude to have for a leader of the school, and that is indicative of his character.”

Zahran declined to say how she knew about the violations. On Sunday, there was a problem involving Morrison’s lawn signs and a Rattiner staffer, but Morrison said on Sunday night that the problem had been a misunderstanding and had been resolved.

Weldai did say yesterday, though, that ECOM had received a variety of complaints throughout the campaign about campaign violations, although no candidate him or herself had been specifically accused of misconduct. Those violations were generally related to postering, chalking and campus signage, Weldai said.

Forty-eight percent of undergraduates cast a ballot in yesterday’s election.

“It was a perfectly normal, clean, rather boring day,” said ECOM Chair Adam Weldai, who added that ECOM received no complaints yesterday about the election.

The percentage of students who voted jumped nine percent from last year, although voting last year was nine hours shorter due to a problem with WebCenter. Forty-five percent of eligible voters cast a ballot two years ago.

Weldai, a senior, said the number of students who participated in the process this time was “awesome.”

“I think the turnout represents the student body’s level of interest in what’s going on,” he said, which he said was high despite the fact that two voided freshman Senate elections had caused the presidential election to shift back to the last day of classes.

Last night, Rattiner celebrated his win at a party at the Alpha Epsilon Pi fraternity house. He said he was happy the election had finally come to a close, giving him a chance to relax with friends.

He had run a campaign that focused on the “here and now” for students, aiming to build community within the student body, and said he wanted to be realistic about what the Senate could accomplish.

During his campaign, Rattiner said he aimed to bolster school pride and promote intellectualism at Tufts.

“Tonight, I’m just going to take the night off and really thank the people who … helped make this happen,” he said after hearing the results shortly after midnight, noting in particular the dedication of his campaign manager, sophomore Katy Simon.

Outgoing TCU President Duncan Pickard, a junior, last night praised Rattiner’s ability to lead, which he said Rattiner had proven this year on Senate.

“I think that that style of leadership is very effective in realizing projects that benefit the student body,” said Pickard, adding that all of the candidates performed well.

“I was really impressed with their campaigns,” he said. “The great thing about running for TCU president is that no matter what happens … you’ve already made an impact on Tufts.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

30 comments

Your name
Fri May 1 2009 10:16
Wait you just realized TCU Senate is a joke? Now THAT'S funny!!
Your name
Fri May 1 2009 10:08
Am I the only one who thinks it is a shame that, on such an 'activist' campus, less than 50% of the student body votes? Congratulations Tufts, your university ideals are as big a farce as the TCU Senate.
Your name
Fri May 1 2009 09:55
She doesn't win, so she mudslings the day after in the Daily and brings up an issue that was resolved between the Brandon-Chas campaign. She's such an obnoxious, self-righteous, snotty, little sore loser. **I’m just disappointed with Samia, that’s all. She’s immature -- her whole team, in playing up the race card. I feel like I’m not comfortable with her leading any portion of the school, because she shows very poor behavior and a bad attitude to have for a leader in the school, and that is indicative of her character.**
Your name
Thu Apr 30 2009 16:37
I hate this kid. He has ruined Tufts. How could he spend 230,000 on a lodge. what a retard.....
Your name
Thu Apr 30 2009 15:55
Samia was clearly unqualified and the candidate information she attached to the ballot was so poorly written I was barely able to discern anything resembling a platform in it. She seemed nice, but in retrospect, I'm very glad she didn't win. I don't know how comfortable I would be having someone who so unabashedly and publicly puts down people by saying they have "bad character" as president. If you have your beefs with someone, that's fine. I understand why she is disappointed in Brandon. But the Daily certainly isn't the place to voice it. Be nice!
Bo Bappolo
Thu Apr 30 2009 10:34
I voted for Bassnectar.
Your Name
Wed Apr 29 2009 16:20
I'm really quite sad that Chas didn't win. He was more qualified for the position hands down. Plus--I do think that there was some truth to what Samia was saying. I personally witnessed a few Brandon supporters taking down Chas signs in broad daylight. Not to mention how obnoxious Brandon and his supporters were. He woke me up from a nap at 11 pm the night of the election by pounding on my door to ask me whether I had voted. I had never met him before. It's nice to get people out to vote, but doing that is unacceptable. What kind of an obnoxiously overblown prick does he think he is?
Directed at Chasfan
Wed Apr 29 2009 16:12
Chas is also a white, male, fraternity bother. Why bring that up if the candidate you support also fits that demographic?
The Agent
Wed Apr 29 2009 04:20
Coming from The Decider, that means quite a bit. Believe me, I would know.

But seriously, what's done is done, so let's pick our tails up off the ground and move along. I am sure no one will remember all of this come December or so.

The Decider
Tue Apr 28 2009 23:10
Unfair? Boo frickin hoo. Tufts already has very strict campaign spending limits. There's none of that in the real world, my friend--nor should there be.

It's also unfair that some candidates are more attractive than others and that some are better speakers than others. People like you will never accomplish anything in life. If you're making excuses for Samia, I know you make excuses for your own failings. No one wants to hear why your boss is sexist for firing you, your boyfriend is crazy for dumping you, or that your mother is mean for not hugging you enough. Quit whining and MAN UP: good advice for Tufts, good advice for life.

Pffft
Tue Apr 28 2009 22:03
I don't know why people are resorting to putting down candidates. We know the President doesn't really do anything anyway. I think it's pretty unfair that some people were able to put so much money into the campaign with lawn signs and t-shirts and websites, but whatever. Tufts will continue the same way it always has...probably a little worse.
Your name
Tue Apr 28 2009 20:43
I just hope they all clean up their stupid signs. How much money did chas spend on all of that crap?
The Decider
Tue Apr 28 2009 15:55
I'm so bleepin sick of whiny minorities and guilty whites drone on about the racial implications of everything where they don't get their own way. Look, anyone who heard Samia speak knows that she wasn't prepared and had a very narrow platform, tailored to students on campus who need constant re-affirmation that they're "special." Stupid candidacy, stupid girl. Hopefully this election showed that the campus isn't receptive to this bs.
Your name
Tue Apr 28 2009 15:47
I can't wait until my student organization's budget gets cut to support things no one really cares about. I can never forgive Brandon for the Trips Cabin.
Your name
Tue Apr 28 2009 14:37
samia's disappointed... wah wah
Non Voter
Tue Apr 28 2009 14:22
Who says Samia is not qualified? And Why?
I voted 4 Elton
Tue Apr 28 2009 14:06
As far as not having Qualified minority Candidates running. Mitch Robinson, was a great president and Elton Sykes was an extremely qualified candidate. At the end of the day this is a predominantly white, straight, upper-class campus and for the most part our leaders have reflected that (for better or worse). These elections aren't really won on ideals or potential for change, lets be real w/ ourselves. It is who spends the most time and money advertising themselves. Who has the biggest chalk signs, the coolest t-shirt and the website with the most animations. At the end of the day we should really think about the class implications of our electoral system and if they really do make elections fair for all candidates. Especially candidates from minority backgrounds.
Your name
Tue Apr 28 2009 13:29
I'm just glad Samia didn't win. What a kook.
tufts student
Tue Apr 28 2009 10:05
Hey i would just ask that we keep the posts to the election- no need to be ignorant and obnoxious by bringing up the KSA students- that issue has been settled, and they were the victims- also, Brandon won and won because he connected with students on campus- how about we don't worry about what race people are? another white president? how about a qualified president? I would not vote for someone just because they are a minority or just because they are a majority on campus- but only if I felt they were up for the job.
Jumbolaya
Tue Apr 28 2009 09:02
I miss Mitch Robinson.






log out