College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Solidarity rally shows ugly side

By Michael Hawley

Print this article

Published: Thursday, November 5, 2009

Updated: Thursday, November 5, 2009

I am writing in response to the Nov. 3 cover story “Tufts celebrates Black Solidarity Day,” but more especially in response to the event itself. I was only able to witness part of the rally behind the Campus Center patio on Monday, but what I saw does not correspond to the impression conveyed in the Daily, which quoted only proponents of the event and depicted a positive, unity-oriented celebration. Instead I heard several implicitly and explicitly racist statements, some of the most egregious of which elicited applause from those members of our faculty and fellow students in attendance.

A few classmates and I were walking past the patio on Monday just as Professor Peniel Joseph was delivering the keynote address. But we did not hear anything about “solidarity between different communities and how we support each other and grow” as one attendee reported to the Daily. We heard “black people have lived here longer than anyone” and “black people are more willing to bleed for this country than anyone else.” Coming from a history professor, the first claim strikes one as odd and absurd, but the second is not nearly so harmless. Two of the people I was walking with were white ROTC students, who were justifiably outraged at the suggestion that their skin color makes them less likely to fight for America. That such an ignorant and racist statement could come from one of our professors and gain the support of our peers ought to be troubling to everyone.

But, in an effort to be mature, we did not call the Bias Education and Awareness Team or hold a rally of our own to celebrate our victimhood. In fact, we did nothing at all, and continued walking by. But even that was not enough for Professor Joseph who, noticing us at that moment, called to “all you white folks walking by” to stop and listen to what he had to say, drawings loud cheers (and some jeers) from the crowd. Naturally, being singled out for our skin color as needing special education by a Tufts professor did nothing to improve our comfort level and we kept walking.

Later I passed by the rally again, where I listened to a story about white police officers shooting an unarmed black youth. The race of the police officers featured prominently in the narrative as if it proved something. However, one can just as easily find anecdotal evidence of blacks victimizing whites. Most people would argue that neither type of story proves anything about either race as a whole. Moreover, if the rally on Monday were truly about solidarity and unity with other communities, why would it so prominently feature commentary and stories such as these?

I concede that Black Solidarity Day was likely conceived innocently with no malice towards other groups and am loath to attribute some of the comments I heard and attitudes I perceived to racism. But I cannot ignore what took place. I would welcome an explanation from Professor Joseph and the organizers of the event. But regardless, I think this university ought to take a hard look at whether we have nurtured our own brand of racism within the Tufts bubble.

--

Michael Hawley is a junior majoring in political science.

Comments

35 comments
Happy Black Person
Wed Nov 11 2009 21:13
I am not sure what has warranted all of these op-eds about Black Solidarity day. Michael Hawley and Alexi Paraschos....you are both wasting our time! And enough with calling Tufts a 'white institution'. It is not. I am a black student who feels quite happy at Tufts especially since I am getting a free ride to go here.
Your name
Tue Nov 10 2009 17:51
So bad behavior justifies bad behavior?

Can't we all just agree that calling people out on the basis of race is racism and should be discouraged at a progressive institution like Tufts University?

Respectful criticism
Tue Nov 10 2009 15:16
"victimhood" is not a word to be throwing around so lightly michael. you felt victimized by being called out walking through a patio, being slightly embarrassed in front a small crowd of your peers? what about marginalized communities who spend their entire lives been victimized--in violent, inescapable, you-can-not-begin-to-imagine ways. not being called out briefly like yourself one day out of 365, but being verbally and physically harassed every single day of their lives. you barely ( i repeat, barely) have had a taste of what victimhood entails (most especially as a white male). i respect your endeavor to better understand what the rally was about, if that was the motive of your op-ed, however maybe you should have paused before publishing this article for an introspective moment. are you really a victim michael hawley? hardly.
Your name
Mon Nov 9 2009 02:24
The question to ask: Did Professor Joseph say this? And did he mean it?

Stop yelling at Mike Hawley about context if the context is the same thing.

Let's Be Real
Mon Nov 9 2009 01:58
No one can ever MERELY respond to something-- official news article or not...words are powerful, Op- eds are influential...his opinion may be the only one that people will have of Black Solidarity Day. Its important that people post these comments to let those who are misled by his op ed piece and his view of the "offensive rhetoric" see that he was completely misguided by his own feelings toward the two sentences he heard in passing, as opposed to what was really going on. The context means everything. As a student, journalist, op-ed writer, or intellectual--context is everything. he can not possibly ignore the whole context of the speech, slap his own views on it and then expect for people to be ok with it. For one to say its MERELY a response is belittling the intellectual exchange that is expected to happen at a university like Tufts
Your name
Sun Nov 8 2009 18:33
This is an Op-Ed, not a news article. He wasn't reporting on the event as a journalist, he was merely responding to some of the offensive rhetoric that he heard.

Most of the "bias incidents" on campus are reported by people DOING EXACTLY THE SAME THING.

Your name
Sun Nov 8 2009 12:38
Truth is the best defense. Hawley should be commended.
Your name
Sun Nov 8 2009 09:13
If people actually read the all comments, there are a few that do address every "fact" brought up in the article. Everything that needs to be said has been said and those who still don't get it never will.
Your name
Sun Nov 8 2009 01:05
I would like to point out that none of the criticisms of Mike Hawley actually argue with anything he says, besides (untruthfully) saying that he didn't call them out as "white folks."
Your name
Sun Nov 8 2009 01:03
"Michael Hawley you are an IDIOT. How did you even get into Tufts in the first place? You disgust me with your terrible journalism skills. You cannot go to an event for five minutes, take a few words out of context, and then come up with a generalized false statement. Try using your head next time, bud. You SUCK and have no friends."

You're very mean. Also, you make yourself sound dumber for asking how someone got into Tufts.

Your name
Sun Nov 8 2009 01:02
That one person who keeps attacking Mike is funny. Too bad the majority of students, who didn't show up to that rally, agree with him.
Your name
Sat Nov 7 2009 21:13
Tufts is so embroiled in provincial race wars. Get a life people!
TJ
Sat Nov 7 2009 19:34
I wonder how many of these comments were written by the same person. Thanks to the anonymity of the web, we don't know if it isn't just the same pissed off person attacking Mike over and over again.
The Decider
Sat Nov 7 2009 12:55
"Getting to the point:" You really think a few angry comments are going to make Mr. Hawley "think twice" before publishing in the Tufts Daily? Mike Hawley can write wherever he wants, wherever he wants, and the idea that this so-called "blowback" is going to deter him from stating uncomfortable truths is laughably absurd.

Two dozen angry PAA goons do not a controversy make. The Tufts Daily comments section is not a representative sample of the Tufts community. In fact, unless Tufts has changed a lot in the past two years, the average Jumbo is less likely to read anything with "black solidarity" in the title than you fellas can even fathom.

"Getting to the point" is right about one thing. This thread is getting out of hand. Aside from the he said/she said element of the "white folk" comment, no one has addressed the Right Hon. Professor's claims about blacks being more willing to bleed for their country than whites.

Word to the wise: That kind of bull might get you high fives in the Capen House, and it might turn a few heads at Tufts, but in the real world it's going to result in a firestorm of angry white Americans (e.g. Van Jones). Consider yourself warned.

Your name
Sat Nov 7 2009 11:02
Op-Ed Drama!
Getting to the point
Sat Nov 7 2009 02:10
People should stop commenting on this op-ed. This is just a little child screaming for attention. Michael Hawley is a waste of time. You can run your mouth in the Primary Source all you want about your conservative issues, but you better think twice before you attack a community/event/ a particular person that you are completely ignorant of because it will not only make you look unprepared and stupid, but also discredit your claim. So sit down, shut up and learn.
Your name
Sat Nov 7 2009 00:27
What's up with all this "EPIC FAIL" nonsense? I mean, apparently it's clever enough for two really bright individuals to come up with independently and apply to this article. Ebonics, I'm guessing?
Your name
Fri Nov 6 2009 20:19
I think the Tufts community needs an "explanation" from you for being so irresponsible in your "article." Misquotations, taking things out of context and coming to an erroneous conclusion about what happened in the 3 hours of a ceremony for which you heard in passing MAYBE a minute of in total---both times. This is disgusting and a representation of the "bubble" people like yourself have created. Do not try to become the victim. Victims, at the very least, know how they are being victimized. You didn't have a clue what was going on. By the way, I guess you know what it feel likes to be the minority. Im sure you would like some support like the black community still does and needs- hence Black Solidarity Day. Quite frankly, the event wasn't supposed to make you or anyone feel comfortable, it was meant to motivate and inspire people to close the schisms amongst people, especially amongst the black people on campus. It was not Peniel Joseph's job to make you feel comfortable, it was to get you to listen. Apparently, he did a good job-- you just didn't listen long enough or well enough. Because if you did, you wouldn't have posted this slipshod attempt of an article reporting on an event---one to which you didn't attend. P.S. God bless you and your ignorant approach to such a sensitive issue. Get it together --- your Tufts student--
Your name
Fri Nov 6 2009 17:03
Epic failure.
Thinks this article is unacceptable
Fri Nov 6 2009 15:18
I dismissed his whole article--the entire thing-- You don't write an article on a few sentences you heard in passing..thats dumb-- not the Tufts way--get it together Mr. Hawley. Clearly, he took the speech out of context as the informed person befpre me has stated quite eloquently. Therefore, his whole arugument of racist bigotry taking place on Black solidarity day is and always will be illogical.






log out