Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

The truth about Sarah Palin

Published: Thursday, October 23, 2008

Updated: Thursday, October 23, 2008 12:10

kerry5

Kerry criticizes McCain's campaign tactics, calls Obama's inexperience a 'virtue'

In an exclusive interview with the Daily, Sen. John Kerry gives his take on the 2008 election. Full story

johnkerry

Kerry: Obama has better foreign policy judgment

    Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) roundly praised Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama’s ability to handle global problems and questioned the direction in which Sen. Full story

Over the past two months, followers of both John McCain and Barack Obama have closely examined the vice presidential candidacy of Sarah Palin. When McCain named Palin, the little-known governor of Alaska, as his running mate, he sparked a frenzy unlike any that had come before Palin's selection, as millions attempted to determine (as Palin, curiously, now wonders of Obama), who is Sarah Palin?

Perhaps no puzzling snippet from Palin's biography — and we now know there are many — says more than the August article in The New York Times, "Conservative Ire Pushed McCain From Lieberman." Detailing the selection process of the McCain campaign, the Times revealed that McCain very much wanted to select close friend Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.), while his advisors preferred Mitt Romney and Gov. Tim Pawlenty (R-Minn.). Palin was the only candidate they all agreed on.

So if you're wondering how John McCain and his close circle of advisors and friends (specifically Steve Schmidt and Rick Davis) could believe Sarah Palin was the right choice for vice president, well, the answer is simple: They didn't.

From the perspective of the McCain campaign, Palin's candidacy had several pros: She is a woman, which would hopefully attract disenchanted Hillary Clinton supporters. She is a "maverick," which is to say she isn't afraid to ruffle the feathers of fellow Republicans, a theme of McCain's own candidacy. She has executive experience as a governor. And, like Obama, she is a young, exciting newcomer, someone who could generate enthusiasm for the McCain ticket. However, McCain and his advisors made a crucial mistake. In their desperate attempt to steal headlines from media darling Barack Obama, they compromised everything McCain stands for and, with a victory, might very well threaten the well-being of the United States of America.

As we watch Palin sweep the country, questioning the character and credentials of Barack Obama, it is very difficult not to laugh. As she wonders if Barack Obama is unstable, she fails to explain why she needed to attend five different small colleges before graduating (with an intention to become a broadcaster, no less). As she tells the media she wishes the McCain campaign would explore Obama's connection to his "dangerous" pastor Jeremiah Wright, she declines to discuss her own religious beliefs, including the notion that abortions in cases of rape should be illegal. The hypocrisy of her rhetoric crested during the Republican National Convention as she and Rudolph Giuliani openly mocked Obama's credentials, with Giuliani going so far as to sarcastically wonder if being mayor of a town like Wasilla, Alaska, "isn't cosmopolitan enough" for Senator Obama (because if there's one thing Rudy Giuliani isn't, it's "cosmopolitan"). "A small-town mayor is sort of like a community organizer, except you have actual responsibilities!" Palin declared to ravenous applause, even though she has only been governor for less two years and mayor of a small town for two terms.

Palin's time as mayor of Wasilla is often pointed to by her supporters as the type of "executive experience" that trumps Barack Obama. What her supporters fail to mention is that at the conclusion of her second term, Wasilla had 6,300 residents. To put this into proper perspective, Tufts' combined undergraduate and graduate enrollment is well over 8,000. While she rails against unethical behavior by politicians, Palin was sued for wrongful termination by the police chief she fired in her first month (she fired him as well as the town librarian almost immediately because she felt she did not have their full support as mayor. The librarian was quickly rehired). This experience foreshadowed her dismissal of the public safety commissioner years later as governor. Maverick, indeed.

Even more worrisome than her persona as a maverick with executive experience are troubling comments Palin has made about her vision of America. This has been a chronic concern, but Palin outdid herself recently when she told a crowd in Greensboro, North Carolina, "We believe that the best of America is in these small towns that we get to visit and in these wonderful little pockets of what I call the real America, being here with all of you hard-working, very patriotic, um, very, um, pro-America areas of this great nation."

Palin later (as all politicians tend to do) clarified her remarks, but the message was clear: Small towns are the "real America." The implications in this statement for big cities are unclear. But what is it about these small towns that Sarah Palin likes? Could it be the disproportionate number of white and Christian citizens? Maybe. That would certainly explain why 34 of the 44 cities Palin had visited until she made these comments had higher white populations among voters than the national average. Or it could be that they have fewer fast food restaurants. It's hard to say. It warrants mentioning here that Palin has given addresses at her church as recently as this summer characterizing the Iraq war as "God's plan" and also said that "God's will has to be done in unifying people and companies to get that gas line built, so pray for that." Her senior pastor has professed that the Sept. 11 attacks were part of a war over Christian faith and that Jesus Christ has called upon his followers to die in the name of this war. But yes, Governor Palin, tell us more about Jeremiah Wright.

The real shame in this is that, for all the scrutiny McCain gets among Tufts students, he was a very good alternative to Barack Obama. His tax and health care policies are arguably superior to Obama's, and his years in the Senate have revealed a capable and principled leader with experience that Obama simply doesn't have. Yet as he and his advisors argued over the selection of his vice presidential candidate (one of vital importance, as McCain is 72 with his fair share of health concerns), they were forced to reach a compromise. In Palin, McCain got the maverick he wanted, and his advisors got the social conservative. It was a win-win. The only loser? America.

--

Max Winograd is a freshman who has yet to declare a major.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

Mark
Thu Jul 2 2009 00:06
I wonder if McCain drove anyone off of a bridge?
Mark
Thu Jul 2 2009 00:03
So, how much foreign experience did Bill and Obama have before assuming the Oval Office? My metro area has more people than the State of Arkansas. How did Jimmy do in the foreign policy area? Having worked in the public sector, disagreements over budget issues happen all of the time. You fail to realize, Palin was the Mayor and the police chief was the subordinate, guess who wins in that battle? If the chief is not civil service, he serves at the pleasure of the Mayor. Governor Palin did not graduate from an elite school, it sounds you are somewhat of a snob. I lived in a very wealthy neighborhood in my youth, yet, I learned not to be arrogant. Obama and Biden do not have any executive experience, zip, zero, none. Have you considered how you will obtain employment after you graduate from the University with an 9.4 percent unemployment rate? I hate to inform you as an economics graduate, it is going to get much worse before it gets better. By the way, if Universal Health Care is such a great idea, why is the White House, Congress, and Federal employees exempt from the Kennedy bill, have any ideas? The Reagan tax cuts, increased Federal Tax revenue from $515 billion(1980) to $980 billion(1989). All spending bills start in the House of Representatives, your party was in the control, what happened?

The Democrats have insulted minorities for years, you need to do some basic research. For many years, African-Americans were Republicans because of President Lincoln. Who was the party of Jim Crow and Bull Connor? Obama's economic plan is a distaster, just as F.D.R.'s New Deal sent the American economy into a prolonged depression. Yes, I have the facts to back up that statement. I pray that you never join the media. The vast majority of journalists do not have any training in economics, stats, biology, chemistry, or physics. With this lack of basic educational training, they tend to come to idiotic conclusions and make goofy statements.

George Patsourakos
Mon Oct 27 2008 11:32
George Patsourakos
I think it is sad for America that John McCain did not select a more experienced candidate (eg, Mitt Romney) to be his vice president. The fact that Sarah Palin is a woman; has great charisma; has not been affiliated with Washington, D.C. politicians and lobbyists are all significant factors for McCain's choice. On the other hand, Sarah Palin has no experience in American foreign policy and has been governor of Alaska for less than two years. I think the fact that McCain chose Palin to be his vice president "for all the wrong reasons" will have a disastrous effect upon him!
Thomas Whitaker Stults - Houston
Sat Oct 25 2008 07:39
Some of these attack on Palin border on the rediculous. Aren't there more important things to argue about than the $150,000.00 wardrobe? Such expenditures are common. Every news anchor woman has a wardrobe paid for by the Network Honchos. Pollitics in this country has become little more than a "Nanny, Nanny Boo Boo" game of "Got ya." Simply stated, it stinks.
Fred Thompson
Thu Oct 23 2008 16:35
Sarah Palin has exposed a cultural divide in America in a way that hasn't happened since the OJ trial. Supporting her has become a referendum of the virtues of rural Christian American towns that has become bigger than the presidential race, as exhibited by the VP debate's TV ratings. And yes, the intellectuals who vote for Obama because of Palin's Christianity and folksyness are just as pathetic as the Joe-Sixpack's who vote for Palin because she talks like them, and maybe more so, because they would claim they know better. The economy, Russia, Iran, energy, and education are all real issues, and the fact that they've all taken a backseat to Sarah Palin's idioms is a pathetic reflection on this country.
Richard W
Thu Oct 23 2008 15:24
Regarding the $150,000 wardrobe..... The governor has been caught Palin around with accessorists
UsedtoliveinSomerville
Thu Oct 23 2008 13:03
selective info, but pretty on target, consistent tone, and good distribution of complex sentences. I certainly disagree with your conclusion that our nation ("America" as Sean Hannity says more often than any other human) is the loser, though. The modern political process can and sometimes does actually work, and this election with these candidates, fortunately or not, is proof; that's why we have campaigns rather than simply elect officials based purely on CV's or resumes -- would Sarah Palin have included any mention of Troopergate on her resume? Would Barack Obama have mentioned Ayers on his? It is the responsibility of the 4th Estate to detail the candidates' backgrounds. This election, for a change, the media seems to be taking its responsibility seriously - and with support from "undeclared" journalists maybe we'll have fair and balanced information to help guide our decisions.
Your name
Thu Oct 23 2008 13:03
Palin is a Goddess!!!

I don't mind looking at her for the next 8 years. At least she can talk without a teleprompter. Your "one", can only say "uh uh ah, oh uh uh uh ah uh ah. So much for the ivy league education. Funny how he hasn't released his grades!

Now can you write a piece about Barry. Thats what I thought.

Angie
Thu Oct 23 2008 13:00
I had thought my choice would come down to the vice president candidate and I was right. McCain's choice of Sarah Palin ensured my vote for Obama!
expat
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:58
How can people possibly be jealous of Palin as the Virginian suggest, seriously? Being a laughing stock is not something that causes jealousy. It does cause concern that if this woman becomes president, what kind of damage she will do to the nations. She is, after all, bushier than Bush in many ways.
J. Wiley
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:56
You wrote: "His tax and health care policies are arguably superior to Obama’s..." This seems rather tossed off and begs for some expansion.
Wil D
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:49
"One of the things I like most about McCain is the fact he is beholding [sic] to no one but the American People."

Maybe that was true a long time ago, in an America far, far away (as long as you don't mention Chuck Keating.) But McCain's recent transition into Rovian style politics, idiotic base-pleasing VP selections, $700 billion bank bailouts, promises to continue Bush's brainless tax cuts for the rich, as well as his disastrous backing of the Bush doctrine (which is far more likely to result in further terrorist attacks on American interests than a President who asks questions before dropping bombs on the wrong country) argues that McCain is beholden (NOTE: I believe this is the SAT word you were searching for) to all the same shadowy interests that have gotten the U.S. into our current state of economic disaster and growing disrespect on the world stage.

Oh, and before you call an argument intellectually insulting, you might want to grow a functioning intellect...

Guy from Virginia
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:46
Dear Writer,
What I find simply amazing is the overt jealousy pundits and liberals have for Sarah Palin. She is the first breath of fresh air in decades. Your assertion that her college education is not of your caliber or that simply by attending more than one school she has net measured up is just rubbish. We don't need a sophisticate for the office and frankly, Ivy education does not appear to have truly distinguished leaders overall. Leader have the grit to follow their principles and to lead even when its tough.

People are jealous of Governor Palin. She's candid, truly cares and is ready to do the hard work required of the next VP. Bill Clinton was a governor for a while. So was Carter and a litany of others from even smaller states. But no one makes that connection. Convenient, huh? And how about the 144 days, yes only days that Barack Obama served as a Senator. Most of that was campaigning. Truth be told Governor Palin has more experience than this talented and eloquent man. He has the international experience of a postman and picked a VP with the credibility of a store clerk.

Mike, PA
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:46
I'm impressed. This was very good for a college freshman. Keep up the good work Max and see you in a few years on the national news scene.
Arthur
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:40
A little biased, but mostly accurate. Now, do a piece on Obama. If you can.

Leaning towards Obama.

Michael
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:37
I can't help but be a bit curious about what a "pubic" safety commissioner actually does? I guess you can't always trust spell check. Sometimes you actually need to read what you wrote!
Joe Bento COL US ARMY RET
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:37
Pailin is igloo trash at best and made my choice of Senator Obama the right one for sure.
jojo
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:36
It is obvious to me that all the liesand smears about Obama are being believed. Obama is a very Christian man, a family man, with great dignity and honor. He is very intelligent and considers all the facts and seeks respected men's thoughts before making a decision. The Republican party is out to destroy him with lies. McCain said he was going to go "dirty" and he is. We need Obama. He is the right man for this country. He inspires the young people to think good about themselves, He is able to lead our country in the right direction and has the makings of a very great president. We want America to be respected among other nations again. Go to his website and learn the facts instead of smears.
Jim G.
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:35
Forget about McCain's health. This "one heartbeat away" nonsense distracts from a more urgent concern. Given the way Cheney has expanded the power of the VP office, Palin would be incredibly dangerous almost immediately. I think McCain would be irrelevant on on Day 1, and I think the far, far, right understands this. If elected, Palin would be off doing God's work instantly, whatever she deems that to be, in the infamous secure, undisclosed location.
Markk
Thu Oct 23 2008 12:35
Peter,

Can you tell us how you feel in your own words? All that you did is repeat what Limbuagh, Fox News, Palin, & McCain already said. We already have enough republican parrots speaking words, including Palin. I would like to actually start hearing a republican speak from their own mind. The American people are tired of you guys that speak only for the sake of speaking.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In