College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Tufts researchers contribute to particle accelerator experiment

By Kira Hessekiel

Print this article

Published: Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Updated: Tuesday, October 27, 2009

LHC

Courtesy atlasexperiment.com

The LHC is a 17-mile-long particle accelerator.

A consortium of Boston-area researchers hopes to fill in a missing piece of a fundamental theory of physics within the next couple months, when groundbreaking tests are carried out at the world’s largest and most powerful particle accelerator.

The group of researchers will analyze data from an experiment to take place in the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), a 17-mile-long particle accelerator located under the French-Swiss border. Built by the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) near Geneva, the LHC has been plagued by setbacks since researchers first used it briefly in Sept. 2008, but it is set to fully start back up next month.

Tufts students and faculty members, partnering with physicists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston, Harvard and Brandeis Universities, hope “to find out more things about fundamental particles,” according to Austin Napier, a Tufts professor of physics and astronomy who is participating in the project.

The consortium’s work centers on ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC Apparatus) detector, one of six experiments in the LHC. Researchers in the Tufts delegation will take advantage of data gleaned from ATLAS’ tests to study specific aspects of fundamental particles.

An electrical failure led to a coolant leak within days of the LHC’s opening last year, forcing it to shut down and placing experiments on hold until now.

The LHC is set to resume normal operations next month. Last week, a preliminary test of the collider’s equipment beamed particles most of the way through the accelerator.

In LHC experiments, two beams of subatomic particles, or hadrons, are smashed together at high energy levels.

Over the past few years, the Boston group — called the Boston Muon Consortium — has helped build parts of the muon detection system for the LHC, according to Napier. Muons are negatively charged subatomic particles.

The physical construction of the system’s parts took place at Harvard, and “Tufts and Brandeis played a big role in its design,” Napier said.

Krzysztof Sliwa, a professor of physics and astronomy, heads up the Tufts team.

Napier and Simona Rolli, a team member and research associate in the departments of physics and astronomy, are most interested in using data from the experiment to verify the existence of the Higgs boson, an elementary particle that has been predicted to exist but has so far remained undetected.

The Boston researchers’ work could change this. Data confirming the existence of the Higgs boson would complete the Standard Model of particle physics, a theory that attempts to explain the existence and interactions of three or four fundamental visible particles.

Other members of the consortium are more concerned with top-quark physics and muons.

Napier said he is “not optimistic about finding the Higgs [particle] for at least a year.” Still, he said, “there’s always room for surprises.”

Napier and Rolli have written much of ATLAS’ software and the software used to analyze data from the experiment. Napier hopes to set up a live display in Anderson Hall of the data collected from the collisions.

ATLAS experiments began last spring but were pushed back because some of the magnets that line the collider developed spots that were more resistive and would heat up during particle accelerations, eventually causing the magnets to push apart, according to Napier.

The system was repaired over the summer. “The energy [used in the collisions] will be lower than originally hoped” this time due to safety precautions, Napier said.

“People are optimistic that things will work,” he added.

The Tufts team also includes two graduate students, Samuel Hamilton and Jeffrey Wetter. Hamilton has spent the last two summers at CERN working on the project.

Junior Matt Rosenfield, meanwhile, is helping Napier put together data displays.

In the past, Tufts faculty members have called on students to help build and design the components of ATLAS, but with the project just weeks from beginning, this kind of hands-on work will only occur if the group decides to upgrade the experiment’s technology in the future.

Rolli believes the spirit of international cooperation is very much alive at CERN, which involves thousands of scientists from around the world.

As part of the program, “you feel very much the sense of being in a team,” he said.

Comments

2 comments
Siegfried
Tue Oct 27 2009 17:33
@luis sancho: wat
luis sancho
Tue Oct 27 2009 14:32
In the fractal paradigm (XXI century science, which will substitute the failed quantum paradigm), the sum over histories do happen but in each fractal self-similar planet of the Universe. What this means is that each human history that ends in this tragic way when mechanists construct a final weapon, a quark cannon, the SCC, the lhc or a self-replicant nano-bacteria as per bill joy, is different. This one as per the last article of Dennis is a long one. The SCC was cancelled, the lhc broke. This gave chances to mankind to update their knowledge accept the warnings of the founders of the fractal paradigm, and cancel this toxi asset of the cold war and the outdated quantum paradigm. We didn’t. Indeed, the press laughed at our warnings, coming from the ‘future of science’, as a defensive tool, ‘killing the messenger’ without even hear him. That the messengers were few is part of the structure of scientific revolutions, and doesn’t invalidate their truths. When ‘Einstein’ was brushed off and sent to write patents because he had defied the XIX century obsolete paradigm (ether) everybody laughed at him. As Kuhn explains new paradigms confront an established industry and take time. We do not have time left. (Note.1:For those anglopocentric scientists who don’t get it, in the same way XIX century German mathematician Riemann and then Planck in quantum space and Einstein in time (relativity) refunded science, in the French speaking world in the XX c. Mandelbrot was with his opus fractals the Riemann of fractal mathematics and in the XXI c. Nottale in quantum space was the Planck and sancho with his 1000 pages opus ‘cyclical, fractal time’ ‘the Einstein’ of the fractal paradigm. Names and egos don’t really matter, in each evolutionary paradigm of science and in each planet there are self-similar characters. What will never happen is that higgs, hawking and CERN, which are just the last ‘bizarre ether guys’ of an overstretched quantum paradigm will be right.. In other words what will never happened is that we survive, because in the fractal paradigm, ExT(Einstein)=k=exi(Heisenberg) is determined,IT IS THE GENERATRIX EQUATION OF spatial energy &temporal information, the fractal substances of which we are all made. That is, time is merely the sum of infinite broken clocks of information, from circadian circles to the sun year cycle or the moon month… And space is the abstract definition of infinite vital energies. We are not in spacetime we are made of spatial energies that as all fractals do, create cycles and forms of in-form-ation, till they are completely warped (time warps space said Einstein) and then die in the nothingness of Cantor dust (dust of spacetime we are and dust we shall become), as we all have a duration in time Ti and an energy, e, in balance. When we break those balances we die. So max. Ti=old age is an excess of form that kills us; and Max. E= is an energetic accident that kills us. That is CERN. For the Universe Max. Ti= O Kelvin temperature and Max.E=c speed, are the limits of the membrane of electromagnetic space, the frontier, the Einstein-Rossen bridges to the world of dark, gravitational self-similar fractal macro-scale of the Universe, we cannot break without risking death. Beyond that barrier the self-similar gravitational membrane appears, made of quarks, the substance of dark matter, quark stars, pulsars and black holes. So in the fractal paradigm there is no time travel, YOU CANNOT GO BEYOND C, YOU DIE. Also black holes are as per Einstein frozen stars and its fractal self-similar parts are quark condensates (what lhc will do)… In the fractal paradigm the Higgs is just an antitop/top quark field. Etc. etc. The ether/CERN guys are very sure of their quantum thesis; that is why they give 0 risk. The fractal paradigm that evolves, solves and corrects the errors of the quantum paradigm gives 100% risk. Being humble i sued CERN FOR A 50% risk averaging their and our paradigm, even if we represent XXI c. science. They only represent power. They have censored our information. Scientific papers do not publish us so I wash my hands in front of so much arrogance and ignorance. You will see it on TV and then as 11/9 you will wonder how this could happen? Because there has not been a fair review an open debate Science has lost. Weapons have won. But don’t worry you will live eternal lives and in some fractal planet the Anglo world will properly treat this theme, the good guys will be heard and respected and the cheaters and industrial con-cerns closed down. You already missed the German r=evolution of science by backing the cheater, Newton over Leibniz, because you had mass-media power and Leibniz was humble. Now you have a new-ton mr. Hawking, whose ignorance and arrogance of real XXI century science is appalling. But now you risk your lives as in most sum over histories of mankind… Indeed, there are few surviving humans, as the Fermi paradox shows (no signs of intelligence life in so many planets)...






log out