Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Tufts voices concerns over planned T stop

Published: Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Updated: Thursday, December 3, 2009 01:12

green line

Scott Tingley / Tufts Daily

As many at Tufts and within its surrounding communities look forward to easier subway access thanks to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority's (MBTA) Green Line extension project, university administrators have aired concerns over safety issues surrounding the stop planned for Tufts' campus.

The Massachusetts Department of Transportation's (MassDOT) plan to extend the T's Green Line into Somerville and Medford involves seven proposed stops, including a College Avenue station by Tufts. Scheduled for completion by 2014, it will stand at the intersection of College and Boston Avenues, next to Curtis Hall.

The university's reception of the project has been generally positive, but some administrators are expressing concerns about how the construction process and the station's location will affect traffic safety in the surrounding area.

Vice President for Operations John Roberto said that the station may increase congestion in an area that already has considerable traffic.

"There's going to be increased pedestrian and vehicular circulation at Boston and College Avenues, which is a difficult intersection as it is," he said. "Clearly we have some issues with the proposal. We need to understand all the details of the impact on the university."

The Massachusetts Executive Office of Transportation, which last month came under the auspices of the newly formed MassDOT, filed its Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) in October, outlining several negative environmental effects the project could have, and offering potential remedies. Coordinating efforts with the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) Office, MassDOT opened the report to outside commentary. Tufts plans to offer its input.

"I'm sure that we will most likely find other areas that we will need to address and get more information on, and there are a host of issues that we will be covering in the next couple of weeks," Roberto said.

Tufts' Director of Community Relations Barbara Rubel said the university's questions will mostly center on pedestrian safety, bicycle access to the station and the station construction's "impact on university property."

But Rubel expressed confidence that the MEPA Office and MassDOT will duly address Tufts' concerns in considering the comments it receives on the DEIR report. Comments will be due for submission in January.

"It's at such a key location," Rubel said of the College Avenue station, "so we will certainly raise our safety concerns and make sure as many considerations and protections are put in place as possible."

At a meeting several weeks ago of the Medford Green Line Neighborhood Alliance (MGNA), a community group in favor of the extension, "a lot of the same issues were raised," Rubel said. The MGNA currently sees about 9,000 daily vehicle trips at the intersection and has projected an undetermined increase in volume during peak hour Green Line ridership.

MassDOT has taken a number of steps to address these concerns.

A flyer authored and distributed by MassDOT at a Nov. 18 public hearing at Somerville High School promised that the project will "improve traffic and pedestrian movements at many intersections and will not have an adverse impact on existing traffic operations."

In its Green Line fact sheet released this fall, MassDOT said that, "where possible," it plans to provide cyclists with easy access and bicycle facilities at the new T stations.

Despite administrators' worries, some students and faculty working in the buildings surrounding the proposed site for the station say they are receptive to plans and do not foresee major problems for their operations.

Though the T traffic may produce noise and vibrations in the Tufts Science and Technology Center (Sci-Tech), located on Colby Street, the equipment already in place to secure lab equipment will prevent any potential complications, said Laboratory Technician Chris Hunt with the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering.

 "I don't foresee it being a huge problem," Hunt said.

The MBTA's commuter rail already runs on a track adjacent to Sci-Tech, which has "caused some vibrations," Hunt said. But aside from "a few isolated incidents," the trains have not interfered with the department's lab work. Hunt said that if the new station creates excessive vibrations, the department will consider adding more stabilizing technology in the building.

Junior Andrew Sayler, general manager of the student-run radio station WMFO, expressed a similar approval of the extension. The station is based out of Curtis Hall.

Noise disturbance "is not something we're concerned about," Sayler said. "The commuter rail that goes by there now is as noisy as it gets."

But Sayler called the proposal a "boon to that side of campus," and predicted that WMFO will enjoy increased visibility as a result of the new T station.

--

This article was edited from its original print version for purposes of clarity on 12/3/09.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

6 comments Log in to Comment

Peter of Cambridge
Mon Dec 7 2009 13:21
Seems like some of the folks at Tufts need to get out of the mindset that it is a suburban campus. I am sure the surrounding neighborhood residents would feel the area will be a lot safer with the reduction in vehicular traffic to the school made possible by the T expansion.
MGNA
Fri Dec 4 2009 10:37
Glenn, the article was updated to correct the initial version that erroneously reported that MGNA projected a 9,000 car increase in traffic when the Green Line station is built.
someone who can read
Thu Dec 3 2009 19:11
Re: Glenn-alum
From TFA
"currently sees about 9,000 daily vehicle trips at the intersection and has projected an undetermined increase in volume"
i never knew that currently meant a future projection...
Joe Beckmann
Thu Dec 3 2009 10:44
105 years ago the subway station at Columbia University opened, to many of the same rancorous and cantankerous observations. At the time, the University was a very few buildings on the site of a former Insane Asylum. The University, wisely, bought up much of the then farmland around its site, and that became, along with their recently abandoned site which is now Rockefeller Center, the source of their endowment. Because there are concerns about traffic, perhaps there should be a revenue sharing agreement, to compensate Tufts for higher traffic loads, and to compensate the city and state for increases in value, in liquidity, and in use of the adjacent territories. Since the Tufts endowment is now well established, and largely independent of these appreciation values, such a formula would shortcut other discussions about taxing University operations or property, while capturing the real financial impact of this $1billion investment on behalf of the public at large, rather than the nonprofit, largely un-accountable postsecondary sector.
off-campus senior
Wed Dec 2 2009 18:43
Re: Glenn-alum, you neglect to mention that traffic projections take much more into account than traffic directly related to T passangers. A new T station provides opportunities for economic development in the areas nearby, especially Medford Square, Main Street in Medford, and Boston Avenue and the degree to which these areas develop will also affect traffic. Having lived both on- and off-campus, I can attest to the fact that from a Tufts perspective it is easy not to realize the extent of the congestion in Medford, Somerville, Everett, etc. on many major roads. In the context of two major roads intersecting, an additional 500 cars per hour is certainly feasible. I have not seen the report, but if you are truly concerned I would suggest giving it a serious look, as the increased traffic numbers may not be as crazy as you think.

In the towns of Medford, Somerville, Arlington, Malden and Everett, there are an estimated 260,000 people, larger than any other city in New England besides Boston. When you are in a vehicle, as many residents in these towns use, there is much inter-town travel along major road arteries.

Glenn - alum
Wed Dec 2 2009 09:40
I'd sure like to know the basis for the "community group's" projected increase of 9000 cars per day, which seems preposterous, and should be shot down before it becomes etched in the public consciousness by ill-considered journalistic repetition. Assuming 18 hours per day (6 am to midnight) of active T operation, that so-called "projection" works out to 500 cars per hour caused by the new T stop. Assuming an average of a train every 10 minutes during those hours, that's a projection of over 83 additional motor vehicles at the intersection of College and Boston Aves for every train. Even if every single rider on every train were to be dropped off or picked up by, or (somehow) park, a single-occupant motor vehicle, when was the last time anybody saw 83 riders getting on and off at a single suburban T stop in the 'burbs, let alone 83 riders getting on and off every single train every 10 minutes at a suburban station, 18 hours a day? It doesn't happen, and it's not going to happen.

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In