Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Setting the record straight

Allow me to refute the recent viewpoint "A Vast Right Wing Conspiracy?" (Feb. 25) concerning the Tufts Republicans' reaction to the recent sex fair. The author initially accurately states that the sex fair was supported by Health Services and the Women's Center. It then takes her all of four paragraphs to change her mind and state "Claiming the University itself sponsored the events... was the Tufts Republicans' second grand faux pas." The sex fair was, according to the viewpoint, "optional" and "educational." Optional? Unless it is deemed reasonable that students not wishing to partake in the fair must forgo using the ATMs, the entire second floor of the campus center, the Rez, the information booth, and various other rooms and offices, an exhibit in the lobby of the campus center hardly constitutes optional viewing. Educational? May I ask what exactly was learned at the sex fair that was educational? Unless the sex fair facilitated visitors' leaps from believing in "unsafe" to "safe" sex, I think we can agree that essentially nothing of true educational value was imparted. No, it isn't a surprise that "STIs are spreading rampant on a campus when there are complaints about learning about proper types of lube." The frighteningly sad surprise is that some seem to believe the campus needs to be taught about "proper types of lube" in order to stop that very same spread. The selected "Vagina Dialogue" panel unfortunately consisted only of individuals that had previously been involved in the "Vday Movement". Next time, how about inviting panelists from both sides? These points, however, are distractions from the real issue at hand:University sponsorship. I find both the Film Series porn screenings and the Naked Quad Run to be of poor taste, but that's not as relevant as the fact that neither of these events is condoned by the University the way the sex fair was. For a refresher on President Bacow's opinion of the Naked Quad Run, check your e-mail archives. The Republicans are not out to bar individuals from organizing "sex fairs." We just want the University to stop sponsoring them. The author says she deserves "the truth." If she held her readers in the same high regard as she does herself, she would have offered them some in her viewpoint. Nicholas Boyd LA '06


The Setonian
News

Non-binding early admissions to Vet School off to a smooth start

Sophomores interested in a career in veterinary medicine now have the option of applying early to Tufts' Veterinary School. Formally approved in the spring of 2003, the program is in its first year, and fills a "glaring gap" in the Veterinary School's structure, pre-health professions advisor Carol Baffi-Dugan said. Baffi-Dugan said the program was inspired by students who observed similar programs available at the Tufts Dental and Medical schools. The early admissions program at the Veterinary School is modeled after these other programs, but it is unique in that acceptance decisions are not binding. Baffi Dugan called this the program's "most extraordinary feature." Non-binding decisions mean that applicants are still free to apply to other graduate schools even if they are granted early acceptance in their sophomore years. Students from Tufts, UMass-Amherst, Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), and the University of Vermont are all eligible for the early admissions program. The program is only open to students from these participating schools. The program considers applicants of any major though, three preparatory steps are recommended. Besides the completion of two science courses, students are encouraged to be active in their schools' Pre-Vet societies and have met with a health professions advisor. Since applicants will not have taken their GREs by the time they apply to the program, SAT scores will be considered. There are still kinks to be worked out such as determining yield ratios and acceptance figures. Baffi-Dugan described this first year as a time "for figuring out an appropriate and comfortable level for a quota system." Once applicant and application trends are better understood, the program may need fine tuning according to Baffi-Dugan. This fall, approximately 15 students attended an information session about the new policy held on the Medford campus. Having spearheaded the program, Baffi-Dugan is pleased to now meet needs of students who come to Tufts specifically hoping to attend its Vet school. "I've been talking to the Veterinary School for a long time about implementing this policy," Baffi-Dugan said. "I know I haven't been the only one, but perhaps I've been the one to pester the most...either way, it has come together beautifully." As with any early acceptance program, admission is contingent on two requirements: there is a GPA cut-off and proof of having completed pre-requisites is needed. Applicants must maintain a 3.4 GPA. Though it is not one of the specifically outlined requirements, it is understood that students are "expected to continually build upon their exposure to veterinary experience... which is hardly a problem since this is something most students interested in Veterinary School approach with passion," Baffi-Dugan said. Veterinary School Admissions Coordinator Patricia Finger pointed out that students would be well-advised to take these conditions seriously. Applicants' progress will be monitored by the admissions director. Accepted students will then have until May 1 of their senior years to confirm enrollment in the program. At this point, it is unclear how many will apply for early decision admission before the Mar. 1 deadline or how many slots will be afforded to those candidates. According to Finger, 750 applications have been received from college seniors vying for entry into Fall 2003's class. Between 70 and 80 of these students will be accepted. Application deadline was Dec. 1 and decisions will be announced in April.


The Setonian
News

Why you should look at Edwards

In July, I gathered in a park in Portsmouth, N.H. to see someone whom I regarded as something of a joke. But what I saw that evening was a brilliant articulation of the issues and values that face America. In July, John Edwards had already begun taking his message of hope and opportunity to the country. He was more specific then any other candidate at the time with a whole host of straightforward programs. He guaranteed one year of college to every high-school senior. He guaranteed health care for every child in America. More than the specific programs though, John Edwards fully laid out the over-arching problems facing the nation at home and abroad. So by August, I was in an old shoe repair shop ripping nails and painting the walls of the new Edwards for President field office in Portsmouth. In January, I found myself putting in the fifteen-hour days that most people believe were only performed by Deaniacs. Now in February, Edwards has emerged as the last challenger in the democratic field. "Objects in the mirror are closer than they appear," was how Sen. Edwards summed up his amazing showing in Wisconsin. Here at Tufts, we continue to read about the Kerry/Dean clash, as the articles in this space on Feb. 18 showed. Well, it is now clear that Edwards is the 'real deal.' I apologize for bringing this slogan back to these pages. After great showings in Iowa, Missouri, Oklahoma and a victory in South Carolina, Edwards is showing that his plan to unite the "two Americas" is resonating all over the country. Previous writers in this space were alright, but they are still stuck in a Kerry vs. Dean mindset. Wednesday's column talked about Kerry's apparent advantages against the President when compared to Dean's "raw meat." What was left out was that Kerry and Edwards poll about the same when matched head-to-head against the President. The CNN/ Gallup poll put Kerry and Edwards at 55 percent against President Bush's 43-44 percent. Kerry is no longer matched up to a populist candidate prone to gaffes and electability questions. Edwards, with a heavy Carolina drawl, always articulates the populist message to perfection. Voters are drawn to how Edwards can personalize every issue in his stump speeches. In Wisconsin, voters who identified "caring about people like them" as the top quality in a candidate picked Edwards by a 17 point margin over Kerry. Most Wisconsin voters chose the economy and jobs as their number one issue. Those voters chose Edwards by 11 points over Kerry. Edwards spent his career as a lawyer, fighting corporate abuses. Some people characterize that as simply ambulance chasing, but Edwards reminds everybody how important each and every case that came before him was. Also, Edwards has a tax credit targeted at helping any American make the down payment on a home. He is proposing to offer federal savings accounts that match dollar for dollar the savings of Americans. These are two examples of Edwards fighting to strengthen the middle class, which is the life-blood of any economy. In the Senate, Edwards passed the patients bill of rights. He continued after 9/11 to write three terrorism-related bills focused on cybersecurity, WMD preparedness, and airport and seaport protection. This gives Edwards the record and the charisma that has been carrying his message farther than any other challenger. The real surprise now is how the voters of Wisconsin asked the nation to keep listening to the cause of a political outsider. I urge everybody at Tufts to go out on CSPAN or the Internet take a look at the only candidate left who is championing the cause of unity and opportunity. I picked John Edwards because I believe in his message and personality. If you are one of the 'I just want to beat W.' voters then look how Edwards drew 11 percent more independent voters than Kerry in Wisconsin. Of those who decided in the last three days, 50 percent voted for Edwards. While I chose Edwards months ago, I wouldn't mind if you chose him in these last few weeks. Luke Shulman is a freshman with an undeclared major.


The Setonian
News

RETHINK September 11 in a gallery of EPIIC proportions

"RETHINK: Cause and Consequences of September 11" will be in the Slater Concourse until this Sunday, Feb 29, so you have all week to go see it. You will even have time to see it again... which you should. The exhibition, put on by Tufts' EPIIC, is so saturated with content that it is hard to take it in all at once. The presentation of the exhibition is more aesthetically aggressive than most galleries. Instead of being able to browse the exhibit at your leisure and focus on the photographs that may be particularly compelling, you are hit with a constant onslaught of images that continually challenge your ideas on the United States' place in the world. Perhaps the most captivating images are those by James Nachtwey. One particularly poignant photograph is a close-up of a bloody hand flashing a peace sign. Nachtwey is considered by many to be the preeminent photographer of his generation. In a statement printed on a wall as a part of the exhibit, Nachtwey says, "I believe that it will help us all to understand photography as a valuable tool that can help us learn how to make sense of the violence, the destruction, the chaos of this world." A series of plasma screens on either side of the concourse showcase a sampling of the photos in the "RETHINK" book, the book which complements the exhibition. This section may require an entire visit of its own. The work of past and present Tufts students is also represented in the exhibit. These photographs range from the pictures taken by students on research projects in Havana and Jersualem to alumni's photos of Turkish Kurdistan which were published in the "The New York Times." The exhibit coincides with the national launch of the "RETHINK" book, which will be held tonight at 8:00 p.m. in Alumnae Lounge. Jonathan Schell, a 2004 Dr. Jean Mayer Global Citizenship Award Recipient, will give the address. The launch of "RETHINK" also marks the first event by EXPOSURE, a Center for Photojournalism, Conflict, and Human Rights, which was formed over the Fall 2003 semester. EXPOSURE owes its roots to the Institute for Global Leadership at Tufts. "We're trying to bring photographers and other documentarians who are involved in war and human rights to Tufts and talk with them about these issues," EPIIC student Matt Edmundson explains. Edmundson was involved in EXPOSURE's creation. Another EPIIC student Esra Yalcinalp feels that EXPOSURE will fill a void in photographic exhibitions. "There was a gap at Tufts. There was an emphasis on aesthetic art, but not photojournalism." Her photography of Mostar, Bosnia-Herzegovina appears as part of the RETHINK exhibit. The photos certainly make strong artistic statements, but it is not a case of style over substance, according to Director of the Institute for Global Leadership and EPIIC Sherman Teichman. "To us, it is artistry." He also said that the reason for the exhibit is not solely a desire to showcase artistic talent but also a "sense of obligation and accountability." Indeed, the photographs are gripping, and their substance is enhanced by the gallery's arrangement. "[The photos' subjects] want their stories told, they need their stories told; we can't afford to look away," Teichman said. Yalcinalp hopes that the RETHINK exhibit will make people who don't know much about world events, contemplate their role in a more global environment. She believes the visual medium of photography is a tool that allows people to engage more with issues and bring the problems of the rest of the world close to home. One can read numerous articles and not glean anything from them, she feels, but photographs have a way of staying with you: "Pictures last longer in our mind's eye than words." The "RETHINK" exhibition is a collaboration between de.MO, a publishing group and VII, a photographic organization. The book features the work of various luminaries in the fields of documentary and journalism, including John Cooley, Professor Robert Dannin, and photographers Ron Haviv, Gary Knight, Antonin Kratochvil, and James Nachtwey. The works of the photographers on display can also be found. Essays by international leaders and intellectuals such as Kofi Annan, His Holiness the Dalai Lama, Susan Sontag, Noam Chomsky, and General Wesley Clark are also represented. Copies of the "RETHINK" book can be seen on display at the entrance to the gallery concourse.


The Setonian
News

Alum runs for Mass. state senate seat

Tufts graduate and three-term State Rep. Scott Brown (LA '81) wants to help the Massachusetts Republican Party gain a foothold in the state government. "One thing I did was question authority," Brown said of his undergraduate years at Tufts. "I still do, that's what I am." Now, he's challenging the popular notion that Massachusetts is a Democratic Party stronghold. The Boston Herald has already thrown its support behind Brown. Even with the endorsement, however, he might have a tough fight ahead. The seventh-year state politician from Wrentham is running in a special election to replace Democratic Senator Cheryl Jacques of Needham. The openly gay Democrat resigned earlier this year in order to take a leadership position at the Human Rights Campaign, a gay advocacy group. Running against Brown in the Mar. 2 election is Democrat Angus McQuilken of Millis, who served as Jacques' chief of staff for 11 years. There is no love lost between Brown and Jacques. Two years ago, in comments to the Boston Globe which Brown now says are irrelevant, he said that the child that Jacques and her partner were having at the time was "not normal." Jacques is currently campaigning in support of McQuilken. But despite the heavy amount of press surrounding the gay marriage debate, both McQuilken -- who supported the recent Massachusetts Supreme Court gay marriage decision -- and Brown and said recently that there were more important issues in the district than gay marriage. "The important issues are education, health, and public safety," McQuilken told the Globe. Brown is confident that voters will be receptive to a candidate far more conservative than the senator he is vying to replace. "I have about 35 percent of the district already in my House district," he said. "There are almost more registered Republicans than Democrats. The whole district was almost more moderate than [Jacques] was." Republican Governor Mitt Romney has been campaigning for Brown and other Republicans running for Democratic seats in the state government. "I can't keep fighting the battle over reform without more reformers like Scott," the Globe quoted Romney telling a crowd outside Needham Town Hall. "I'm going to keep fighting for this man, for other people like him across the Commonwealth who want to bring change to Beacon Hill." Republicans are trying to win enough seats in the Senate to be able to allow Romney a gubernatorial veto. There are currently only six Republicans in the 40-member Senate. The Democrats need a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate in order to prevent the governor's veto. "It's a question of being able to sustain a veto," Brown said. "Once you have the ability to sustain a veto, you have proper checks and balances, of which there are none now. As a result, a lot of things are not good government. There's been absolutely no voter accountability up there." It is because of this needed gubernatorial veto that Romney has been stumping for Republican candidates across the state, going so far as to personally encourage promising candidates to run against Democratic challengers perceived as weak. Brown insists his run for Senate was a "natural progression" from his House seat. "[Romney] did not encourage me to run, but he's been 100 percent behind me," he said. Brown wants to frame the debate around the state's recent budget cuts in a new way. "You have to look at it a little differently: if we merged the Mass Turnpike and Mass Highway, we would've saved $220 million, and local aid wouldn't have to have been cut a penny." According to Brown, he would rather not support cuts to local aid, but until the Democrats streamline the state government, he would never support raising taxes to keep aid levels steady -- a sentiment shared by Romney. Brown said he was personally in "full support" of letting "gay and loving committed partners pass on benefits" and have hospital visitation rights. However, he thought it was more important for voters to have the final say on the issue. "I think that the bottom line is that the people are smart enough, intelligent enough, and mature enough to have a debate and ultimately vote on this issue," he said. During his time at Tufts, Brown was the captain of the men's basketball team, sang in Show Choir, played in the Jazz Band, and served in the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate. One of Brown's fellow TCU senators, Dan Winslow, is now Governor Romney's legal counsel. Brown was also in Zeta Psi. He laments the changes that have happened in the Greek system since his graduation but encourages personal responsibility. "I was a strong supporter of the Greek system then. Unfortunately, kids sometimes forget what it's like to be responsible," he said. At Tufts, Brown cited Sol Gittleman's Yiddish Literature class as one of his favorites because it taught him to think about a culture that was not his own. "It was very inspirational and enlightening," Brown said. Brown recalls fondly his years at Tufts -- he was even married in Goddard Chapel and had his wedding reception in Cabot, which he joked was the last held there, "because people were hanging off the balconies."


The Setonian
News

Penis Monologues

All this talk about the Vagina Monologues has had me thinking: what if they had Penis Monologues? What would they say...what would they wear? Ribbed or Cherry? Instead of "my short skirt" it could be "my short dick," about a man who was scared to get intimate with women because his member fell an inch or two shy of the 5.5 inch average. The "if you love vaginas, you have to love hair" skit could be edited to "if you love penises, you have to love balls" about the stigma that surrounds sweaty testicles. Men could talk about their unexpected visitors. "I got up one morning with a strange lump in my pajama bottoms. It made my ritual morning piss kinda hard. Ended up throwing myself horizontally across the toilet seat so I wouldn't pee all over the wall. When it was still there 20 minutes later I tried thinking about baseball, and then got really desperate and thought of the lunch ladies naked. But it was still there, so I had to use force: half a role of masking tape securing it to my right leg. You know, my mom never figured out why we ran through tape so fast..." Then of course there would be stories about the pressures that men face sexually. "Hey...at least girls can fake it. Me, I don't have the option of pretending. I can't claim I'm sexually aroused when a chick is staring at the limp noodle between my legs. The nights when it just isn't gonna happen, I can't pretend I got off. Actually, come to think of it, I tried that once. Felt real bad for this girl who had been going down on me for a half hour and nothing was happening. So I told her that I had cum, but that I had this family condition where I just didn't ejaculate. Yeah, never got in her pants again..." Certainly there are enough emotionally disturbing situations that arise on account of penises to fill a similar two-hour play. But if they had penis monologues, would men want to go? Would men feel comfortable sitting in an auditorium filled with other men hearing about the tribulations of having a three inch penis, pre-maturely ejaculating, morning wood and erectile dysfunction...or would this scene be too homoerotic for men to feel comfortable? Yet, more importantly than the question of if men would go, is would women go, should women go? I mean, I know that I'd pay five bucks to see the penis monologues. I would go because as a straight woman I recognize penises are organs that (assuming I have enough game) I will be interacting with for the rest of my life. Because sexual intercourse is something that men and women do together, discussions of the penis relate to women, and in the same way discussions of the vagina relate to men. But despite this seeming obvious observation, many men seemed to react to the idea of attending the Vagina Monologues with fear, disinterest, and disgust. They seemed to fear that they wouldn't be able to relate to the Vagina Monologues because they don't have one. In a school where, according to the Office of Undergraduate Admissions, 35-40 percent of the junior class is willing to go abroad for an entire semester and learn about another culture, I find it ironic that such a low percentage of Tufts men are willing to spend two hours in an auditorium learning about vaginas. So maybe the monologues don't mirror your life experiences, but you know, neither do James Bond films, and you watch those anyway. I think there's a misconception that the Vagina Monologues are about 500 women cramming into an auditorium vowing to ditch dicks for vibrators. That there's some hypnotizing vagina pendulum, and all those in attendance leave brainwashed and screaming castration. But this is entirely not the case. The Vagina Monologues recognize the problems that women encounter with their genitalia. At no point does it blame men for the difficulties of puberty, for women's confusion regarding their own bodies, or chastise all men for the violent acts of few. It does not deny or trivialize the experiences and traumas of having a penis, or to say that women's problems are more important. It's not just a play for pissed-off girls. It's for everyone who has a vagina, has touched or penetrated a vagina, or was born out of one. Because sex is something that we engage in together, if you're a heterosexual man, you have to take an interest in vaginas. They're half the equation of your sex life, and without them, quite frankly, you're left jacking off. Please note that the parts of the Vagina monologues I am addressing in this article are mainly the sexual aspects. The play deals with an entire host of issues not all of which are sexual.



The Setonian
News

Williams, Bowdoin to host final four's next weekend

It was a busy weekend on New England's Div. III basketball courts. The quarterfinal rounds of both the men's and women's NESCAC championship tournaments brought few surprises for the top three seeds, but saw both number five seeds triumph over their fourth ranked opponents. On the men's side, the number five Bates men blew out number four Bowdoin 87-52 on the Polar Bears' home court, while the women's number five Williams came out on top of number four Tufts, 73-52, here in Medford. The remaining three high seeds won their respective games in both the men's and women's leagues and will advance to next weekend's semifinals. On the men's side, number one Williams knocked off the eighth seeded Middlebury Panthers 74-52. The defending Div. III national champions look to repeat last year's performance with a core group of senior tri-captains leading the way. Micheal Crotty, Chuck Abba, and Ben Coffin were integral parts of last year's squad and return again lead the Ephs. Crotty averages 13.5 points per game (including the 14 he scored against Tufts on Valentine's Day) while Abba contributes 11.0 points per game and Coffin leads the team in rebounds with 9.6 per contest. With their 67-65 win over Gustavus Adolphus in the NCAA tournament last year, the Ephs became the first NESCAC team ever to record a national championship in men's basketball. They are 24-1 this season, with their lone loss coming from Amherst on Jan. 10. Williams also defeated Div. I opponent and NCAA tournament participant Holy Cross 78-71 on the road on Dec. 4. "To beat Williams, you have to execute very well and you have to be able to keep up with their transition game," senior co-captain Deyvehn East said. "As long as you can establish your game plan early you can have success, but if they establish theirs, it's pretty difficult to beat them. While anyone can beat anyone any given night in this league and there are a lot of talented teams in our league, from what I've seen, Williams is still on top and I don't think anyone will be able to beat them." Fifth seeded Bates will face the Ephs in the semifinals on Saturday. The Bobcats tied their program record for wins this year by going 18-7. Senior Ramon Garcia and junior Brian Gerrity lead Bates in scoring averaging 14.3 and 14.6 points per game, respectively. Earlier this season, Bates fell to Williams in a tight 86-83 match. Trinity and Amherst will square off in the battle between number two and three seeds. Both teams are ranked in the top ten in the nation -- Amherst is fourth, Trinity is tenth -- and will vie for a chance to play the winner of the Williams-Bates game in Sunday's championship. Amherst beat Trinity 68-66 in regular season play. For the women, the juggernaut that is top seeded Bowdoin continued its undefeated season with a first round win over Colby, 68-37. The nation's number one ranked team boasts the best scoring defense in the country, holding its opponents to an average of just 44.3 points per game and normally beats its adversaries by over twenty points. Bowdoin is a three time defending NESCAC champion and last year went all the way to the Elite 8 in the NCAA national tournament. "To beat Bowdoin, you really need to put a whole game together for 40 minutes and you can't be intimidated," sophomore guard Jessica Powers said. "You have to play your best defense because they have tough players, all of whom can score. All together Bowdoin is the best team and has a big advantage, but in the playoffs teams step up so you never know." The Polar Bears will play a rematch of last year's semifinal game against Williams on Saturday. In 2003's game, Bowdoin downed the Ephs 57-46 to move on to the finals and eventually take the NESCAC crown. Williams comes off of an upset win over Tufts on Saturday afternoon. The Ephs are 19-6 on the season and played Bowdoin to its closest match of the year on January 30. With just one second remaining in that game, Bowdoin eked it out with a 62-21 win to keep their unbeaten streak intact. If Williams is to have a shot against this formidable opponent this time around, it will have to play defense similar to that it played against the Jumbos. Second seed Wesleyan is set to play third ranked Bates in the other women's semifinal. The Cardinals beat Bates twice during the regular season in two tight matches, 57-62 and 52-51. Wesleyan won its 20th game of the year in the first round against Middlebury on Saturday and is ranked third in the region. With this high standing, Wesleyan could earn a spot in the NCAA tournament even if it fails to snatch the NESCAC championship from Bowdoin. The upcoming Saturday games, along with Sunday's finals, will be held at Williams for the men and Bowdoin for the women. Though there were no major upsets on either the men's or women's courts, the weekend was packed with the drama only the playoffs can bring. Next weekend should be even more exciting as the remaining four teams in each league move closer to the NESCAC championship.


The Setonian
News

All work and no play makes Jacques a dull boy

In the big lecture hall at Sciences-Po, having a class during sunset is torture -- the wide windows let in the last warm orange rays until the blackness is lit only by the sallow fluorescent lights above. The temperature of the room drops ten degrees in the absence of sunlight. In a recent lecture there, geography class made the transition from boring to painful just as the sun sank below the horizon. Some know-it-all student had been extemporizing for several minutes when my friend Frank leaned over and pointed to him. "That guy is a knowledge-[crapper]," Franck said in English. Frank is German, and apparently Klugschei??er is a colorful way to describe that teacher's pet who seems to have the answer to every question. There are quite a few of these knowledge-[crappers] (also known in German as sock-lickers, according to Frank) at Sciences-Po, perhaps because it's an extremely selective university - these students have a lot of knowledge to crap. Most of the French students at Sciences-Po spent two years after high school taking intensive classes to prepare them for the entrance exam - without any guarantee that they would pass. But they also work like dogs. There are hundreds of international students at Sciences-Po, from every continent, and most of us seem to agree - those French kids need to step outside and cleanse their lungs of stale library air. I've come to understand some of the pressure put on French kids, though, especially when it comes to grades. Grades are public information in France; there is nothing personal or private about them. Professors often begin class by handing back homework individually, announcing what each student has done right (usually not much) and what he has done wrong (e.g. managed to attain his current age with such a woefully inadequate collection of knowledge). In my geography class, our first test was a particularly bruising experience. Madame didn't bother to grade most of our papers, as the majority were "not sufficient" or "not at all sufficient" - a meaningless nuance, I might add. "This is France," she would inform my class of international students, as if we weren't aware. "You must take care over your work." Duly noted. But it's not just the openness of grades in France that crushes students into submission. The grading scale has the same effect, since the highest marks are virtually unattainable. One professor and former student at Sciences-Po, Marc Germanangue, was kind enough to explain the grading scale, which goes "theoretically" from 1 to 20. "Nobody can get a 20," Marc began, unless three conditions are fulfilled: "First, that God exists, which remains to be proved. Second, that He takes exams - and who knows why He would bore himself doing such a thing? And third, that He passes the exam without concluding that He hasn't already attained perfection in His earthly creations." "Who could get a 19?" Marc continued. "An excellent professor, really exceptional - but such a thing doesn't exist, since the profession is too poorly regarded and too poorly paid." "An 18?" Marc was clearly relishing disillusioning a simple American student raised on the generous ABC way of grading. "Your professor could get an 18, but he won't mess around taking his own exam. He'd be too afraid of failing." And so on. French professors, like timid opera singers, just don't want to make full use of the scale. To be fair, some top French universities have purposefully instituted a policy of grade inflation to help their students get accepted at foreign institutions. Imagine the poor French student who must explain to an American admissions board that, really, a 14 out of 20 is quite good. And what exactly does a 14 mean? A firm grasp on the subject, elegance and competence in expressing this knowledge - but not much beyond that. Ingest. Regurgitate. Not that the French have lost any of their long-standing faith in education, which dates to Montaigne in the 16th century and to Condorcet in the 18th, who saw education as invaluable toward personal and social progress, respectively. The tumultuous 19th century viewed public education as a means to liberate the people from emperors and monarchs, freeing them to build their own republic - an attitude personified by a character in Victor Hugo's Les Miserables, General Lamarque. "From identical schooling comes an equal society!" the general proclaims atop the barricades during the 1832 uprisings, as written by Hugo. "Instruction! Light! Light!" These breathless ideas have not exactly come to fruition in the 21st century. Social equality remains elusive, and "identical schooling" has produced to some degree "identical thinking." To be sure, this thinking is at quite a high level, but it seems that a university like Sciences-Po, charged with training its students for the challenges of a rapidly evolving society, ought to encourage in them a little creativity. There will always be knowledge-crappers, sock-lickers, and brown-nosers - but a few more innovators, trendsetters, and leading lights would be quite welcome.


The Setonian
News

Sacred Heart Church believes to have miracle on hand

Parishioners of Sacred Heart Church in Medford believe that a miracle has occurred: the statue of Mary outside the parish's rectory now appears to have tears running down her cheeks. "There's so much craziness, and so much doubt nowadays, but I personally believe it's a miracle," Pastor Bob Doherty said. "She's trying to tell us something, and we have to figure out what it is." Sacred Heart Church is located on the corner of Boston Avenue and Winthrop Street, near campus. The tears were first observed Feb. 9. "People feel that the face has the appearance of tears coming down from the eyes. It was never that way, the statue has always been just white-washed in the face," Doherty said. Believers in the tears have different theories about the statue's grief. Many parishioners believe Mary may be weeping because two Boston area parishes, possibly Sacred Heart, may be closed down. The archdiocese will make a final decision on the closings in May. At a meeting on Sunday night in Medford, it was decided that should these closings be necessary in Medford, the first church to close will be St. James, followed by Sacred Heart. However, Doherty feels that "it more likely may be because there are priests abusing children that there is a sadness and a weeping in her face." Parishioner Ginny Del Signori and her daughters painted the statue two and a half years ago with standard outdoor paint from Home Depot. "I know for a fact that those marks were not there until two weeks ago this Monday," Del Signori said. "I do a lot of volunteer work at the church and I always looked at the statue to make sure it didn't need any touching up." While many are quick to call it a miracle, the face's streaked appearance may be a result of dripping from a steam pipe on the roof two stories above, ice melted in the recent rain, or a defect in the paint. This discrepancy is "why the church authorities are very careful" to declare any unexplained event a miracle, Doherty said. "Most people here say that it's crying, but the painter two years ago definitely did not paint that." Del Signori agreed. "My own relatives have said maybe it's just the ice that melted off in the rain, but I think there's no way. Why is it just in those two spots, why would it just have streaked in those two spots? There is no place else on the statue that there are any marks." A chemist and an FBI agent will soon be investigating the statue, taking a swab from the face to examine the chemistry of the marks. "If it's definitely human tears coming down the face, not paint or tears or a crack in the paint, then it's a little more authentic," Doherty said. "Otherwise we don't want to make a big deal about it." Should secular authorities determine that the streaks are real tears, the Vatican must decide the procedure for recognition. Doherty referenced the recent investigation of a statue in Italy whose tears were decided to be human. "After the tests, then the [Catholic] church may label it something officially, but for now, it's up to people to decide for themselves," Doherty said. Many people have come to see the miracle and pay their respects. "The stream of people is constant. People are leaving flowers, coming in here praying," said Paula Cacciola, the church secretary. "There are people who come every day, they look, they pray, they leave. We're not making it a big publicity deal, it's word of mouth. People who believe and believe what they want to believe are coming." Many are forced to question their own beliefs upon seeing the tears. "A stone statue, crying -- impossible!" Cacciola said of her initial reaction. "The whole thing is odd on both sides. Is it a defect? You have to look at the skeptical side, but to me, there are no other marks on that whole statue. It's like she cried and it just stained her face." Whether or not the Vatican decides to officially recognize the tears as an apparition, Sacred Heart's wish is that "it brings people some hope," Doherty said. "People should come and see and experience it. You really have to experience it. It's up to us to make a change here." Del Signori and other parishioners would like to see the area marked by a monument or shrine, but doubt this would actually occur. "I don't think that will happen unless we have positive proof," she said. "I would like to see the area preserved, and have people come, because she's obviously trying to tell us something."


The Setonian
News

What's so funny?

In a town that produced such comic legends as Conan O'Brien, Jay Leno, and Denis Leary, it's no shock that Boston's comedy club circuit is hot. What may come as a surprise is that two Tufts students just recently made their debuts in this competitive scene at Dick's Beantown Comedy Vault on Boylston. Junior Jack Byrne, a Psychology major and football player, began his foray into amateur stand-up as a hobby. Freshman Jonathan Silver has performed stand-up for the past three years. He aims to make a name for himself. The Vault hosts an amateur night every Sunday. Participating comedians are responsible for bringing at least two guests, who pay the cover charge of $7 each. The atmosphere is casual and audience members may enjoy dinner with the show. On the past two Sundays, Jack Byrne has performed among comedians who often have much more experience than he. Byrne is originally from Massachusetts. He takes the mike at the Comedy Vault for his second stand-up performance armed with a no-nonsense approach and toothy grin. He wears a beaten Red Sox cap and speaks with a slight trace of the Beantown vowel sound. "So... I was thinking about what our bodies do," he opens. He pauses knowingly, allowing the audience to draw some rather graphic conclusions and then launches into a five-minute bit about coughing, snoring, and hiccupping. It works: the audience laughs. Jonathan Silver performs with an unassuming air. He casually lopes up to the stage and begins his standup with observational humor. He involves his audience in the madness of weather forecasts and Ritz crackers. Silver's composure, coupled with his wry delivery of quirky topics in a slightly self-mocking tone, reflects his experience of three years' performances in comedy clubs in New York City. Byrne has his turn working in the wings as well: he previously worked as a bouncer at the ImprovAsylym and is currently enrolled in improv workshops there. Now he works as a bouncer/usher for the Comedy Connection in Faneuil Hall, where he will have the opportunity to enjoy shows by big names such as Chris Rock, Jay Mohr, and Dane Cook. Closer to campus, he recently found his way to Stealing the Funny, Tufts' own student-run improv workshop. Ultimately, Byrne sees comedy as a hobby which can improve his public speaking skills and hopes to go into school psychology and coaching. This is not the case for Silver -- he hopes to continue his stand-up career for as long as possible. His first taste of being a comedian was performing others' jokes in talent shows. Soon he began to develop his own material, which he continues to scrawl in his trusty black notebook. "I write everything down," he says, adding that he avoids bathroom humor whenever possible. "A lot of the lewd stuff I tend not to do. Anyone can talk about doodie." Generally, he relies on subjects that can be funny all the time, but likes to pepper his bits with some topical jokes. It is Byrne's and Silver's refreshing evasion of the tasteless which set them apart at the Comedy Vault. Cheap jokes and crude content seemed to be contagious. Over the course of the evening, the audience was subjected by the other comedians to an impression of Wayne Brady with plumber's crack, countless masturbation gags, and a set devoted entirely to farting and fat women. Byrne explains his theory of comedy: "you don't have to force a joke.... The best comedians just talk to you." His down-to-earth perspective allows him to deal with the pressure of performance and entertaining. He remarked, "You learn that it's not going to be great every time. You've just got to get up... the important thing is getting up." Last semester Silver took the Comedic Theory and Performance at the ExCollege; he and his classmates are now beginning their own sketch comedy group. Eventually, he'd like to see the group become as respected as other performance groups on campus and perhaps one day enjoy a stint as a professional comedian. He simply explained with a shrug, "it feels good to be funny."


The Setonian
News

Grieco, Swidler to lead young pitching staff

Senior tri-captain Julie Fox is going home. After three years of playing third base for the Jumbos, Fox will be behind the plate regularly for Tufts for the first time since high school. The other half of the proverbial battery consists of three strong freshmen and four returning pitchers who each logged more than 30 innings last year. Junior Caroline Grieco led the team with a 1.74 ERA last year as a sophomore and tied then junior Pam Swidler with nine wins. Grieco accomplished all this while battling a torn ligament in her elbow for much of the season, but her arm troubles are now behind her. Both Swidler and Grieco are looking forward to this season despite the challenges that will arise with a new catcher. "I will definitely miss Drake," Grieco said, "but Julie is a smart softball player." Fox has been working with many of the pitchers during the off-season to prepare for her new position. Using her high school experience, she has helped catch in previous winters, but this year she is making sure she knows what her pitchers use as strikeout pitches and what they are most comfortable throwing. Fox is confident in their abilities. "Our returning pitchers really proved themselves last season," Fox said. Sophomore hurlers Julia Brenta and Sarah Conroy established themselves as freshmen in 2003, each recording four wins and playing important roles in the playoffs. This season's rookie pitchers, Lauren Ebstein, Caite White, and Lindsay Evans, have looked promising in the first few weeks of practice as well. "They're working with the pitching coach," Swidler said. "It can be hard to adjust to college pitching, but they're doing really well." The depth added by the three additional freshmen will make it more difficult to divide pitching duties. Grieco, Swidler, Brenta, and Conroy are accustomed to pitching lots of innings and will have to adjust to spending less time in the circle. "If all goes well, nobody will have to come out of the bullpen ever," coach Cheryl Milligan said. "But it's nice to know that I always have someone ten minutes away from being ready if need be." "We have a lot of good pitchers" Swidler added, "and I'm curious to see how everything is going to work out." If having too many good pitchers is the pitching staff's biggest problem, then they are sure to improve on last year's season in which they tied for third in the NESCAC ERA standings with a 2.41 mark. The pitchers all want to do more than improve their ERA's and win/loss records; they want to win their fourth straight NESCAC championship. "We're going to do really well pitching and catching," Grieco said. "I think the whole team will do really well [too]."


The Setonian
News

Community workgroup appointed to solve Somerville drug problem

Somerville Mayor Joe Curtatone established a task force last week to combat the rising OxyContin abuse problem in the city. Since the start of 2004, 14 Somerville residents have been hospitalized for drug overdoses, many of which have been attributed to abuse of the painkiller OxyContin. In a press release issued last Tuesday, Curtatone called this number a "call to arms." According to Curtatone spokesperson Lucy Warsh, the task force will urge more aggressive policing of dealers in the city, make counseling more accessible for abusers, and attempt to educate youth about the dangers of OxyContin abuse. "One of the main goals of the workgroup is to create more community awareness around the issue," she said. The task force held its first meeting on Feb. 9. Curtatone, other city officials, Somerville police officers, representatives from several community health groups like the Cambridge Health Alliance, and two community residents are among its 29 members. "There is a broad range of expertise represented," Warsh said. Director of the Alcohol and Drug Program at Tufts Health Services Margot Abels said she approves of the city's approach to OxyContin abuse. "It seems like they're trying to align themselves with what the research says, which emphasizes a multi-pronged approach," she said. Rather than focusing solely on the "judicial" aspect of hospitalization and detoxification of abusers, Somerville is "coupling [treatment] with community involvement," Abels said. The city seems, she added, to be "covering all its bases." The task force is seen by some to be partly a political move for a mayor already steeped in difficulties. "I think if you took polls around the city, everyone will know someone else who has been affected by OxyContin," Warsh said. "This can really only have a positive political impact for the mayor." Director of the Somerville Health Department Jack Vondras said the task force may prove to be a turning point in how the city treats other drug-related issues. "We have to try to collect data differently," he said. This may prevent future social problems from growing to the proportions of OxyContin abuse. However, state budget cuts may make funding this project difficult. Vondras said that with any new board, it is sometimes hard to decide from which part of the city budget the money should come. According to Vondras, the city is looking to "see how we can use our dollars better, and we will also try to get some advocacy from outside. That is absolutely crucial." Task force member Beth Frasier, the Director of CASPAR Youth Services -- a non-profit organization to help children and adolescents affected by drug and alcohol abuse -- said it is necessary to spend money on drug abuse prevention in order to ensure the health of the entire community. "Investing in creating an atmosphere in which young people can grow up to be healthy is imperative to creating a healthy community," she said. Frasier agreed with Warsh that although it is too early to tell where the task force is headed, it has massive potential. "The worst case scenario is we wouldn't solve any major problems," Warsh said. "But it would still be a step in the right direction." The OxyContin task force was created in conjunction with a task force on teen suicide, another problem in the city. Somerville's suicide attempt rate is almost twice the national average.


The Setonian
News

In defense of the Vet School

I used to think like Diana Cartier ("Residents sound off on Vet School issue," Feb. 17). When I was younger, I wrote a school paper on "animal testing" and used the argument that I would not want to do these tests on my family, so they should not be done on innocent animals. Over time and with experience, however, I have to come realize that this is precisely why animal testing is necessary. It is hard sometimes to explain to others, and sometimes even more difficult to reconcile in my own mind - but research using animals is a necessary evil in this world. I have dedicated my life to caring for animals, and I have spent countless hours studying ways to care for them when healthy and treat them when ill. In order to discover safer and more effective ways to treat animals, I will have to use remedies tested on other animals. I am not qualified to expound on details of the study in question, but I hope that this study and others like it will find new and better ways to treat broken bones, cardiovascular disease, endocrine disorders, and any of the other ailments afflicting our beloved pets. I also hope that advancements in human medicine continue. In most instances, animals are used to test treatments for people. Rickets, polio, measles, rubella, rabies, and anthrax were all researched in animals before human vaccines and cures were developed. Antibiotics, lithium, pacemakers and laparoscopic surgical techniques were all tested on animals before being used on people. Every time I open my medicine cabinet to take Tylenol, cold medicine, or anything prescribed by a doctor, I am grateful that it was first tested on animals. If I break a bone or need surgery, I want the doctor's procedure to have been tested somewhere before. Otherwise, how could I be assured that the procedure was safe? How could I know that taking the drug would not harm me more than it helped me? Rats, dogs and other animals are different from people, but they are the best models we have. Computer models have thankfully been able to reduce the numbers of animals used, but lack the technology to replace live animals. Right now, there is no alternative. When one is found it will be a great day -- drug discovery and safety will improve and countless animals will be spared. But, until then, there is simply no other way. Neither I nor any readers would volunteer their children to be the first living being to try a totally new drug. Likewise, they probably would not volunteer their dog to test something that had NEVER been tried before. Research animals remove this burden from the public. They allow dog owners to know that their treatment is the best available, and allow parents to know that their children's treatments will be safe and effective without having to put their loved ones in grave danger. It is unfortunate that the Cape Cod residents ("An Open Letter to Vet School Students," Feb. 17) did not receive the response they were looking for. I agree with them that the school should be more forthright at times. But, I also think that the school should speak up and be proud of the studies it does. We should applaud the efforts of these researchers to help dogs and I believe that Tufts should advertise this. Unfortunately, how do we then control the floodgates? If everyone had input into every study, nothing would ever be accomplished. Stagnation of research would be the only result and advancement would be hindered. Instead, it seems reasonable to trust trained professionals -- experts in their fields and people who have spent years of their lives caring for animals -- to make these decisions. They do care, and I assure you that the students care. In a letter signed by over 200 students (some who support animal research and some who still have questions), we stood in support of our school and its staff because we trust them to make the right decisions. And, we know that if we have questions about anything, the school will listen to our concerns. The irony of all of this controversy is that Tufts has been and still is an ethical leader. We were the first school in the country to take purpose-bred dogs out of the curriculum and to change the curriculum to exclude terminal surgeries. These changes were brought about by students with legitimate concerns and possible alternatives in mind. The school continued to listen to student concerns in this case, and it is my understanding that those students with issues met with the Dean and voiced their concerns to the researchers. But, every problem does not warrant total change. It is important to understand that most major universities conduct research and that some of this research involves animals. I believe wholeheartedly that there is no better place for animal research to occur than at a vet school -- where the best possible care and most caring people can be found. Josh Kramer is in his second year at the School of Veterinary Medicine


The Setonian
News

The Passion' is painfully graphic and moving

It's a story that has captured Western imagination for centuries, one that has inspired more productions and retellings than can ever be counted. Hailed upon his return to the holy city only days before as his people's chosen messiah, a religious teacher is betrayed by one of his followers and sentenced to death by crucifixion. The innocent man suffers and dies for the sins of the masses, setting off a religious revolution which transformed the Roman world and still plays a major part in our society today. Such is the premise of "The Passion of the Christ," which fittingly premieres today on Ash Wednesday at theaters across the nation. The film follows the final few hours of Jesus' life, from Judas' betrayal of him until the ultimate crucifixion. The film came under early fire because its director, actor and filmmaker Mel Gibson, chose to draw upon apocrypha that is not traditionally included in the Biblical version of the story. Members of various religious communities were concerned that it would inspire a wave of anti-Semitism by depicting Jews as bearing the sole guilt for the death of Jesus Christ. Taking such a famous and fundamental story and turning it into a cinematic production is clearly no easy task considering the numerous interpretations already available. Gibson, working only behind the camera for this film, chose to portray the story as realistically as possible. All filming took place in Italy to match as well as possible ancient Jerusalem. All the dialogue is in Latin and Aramaic, the languages spoken at the time. Though a last-minute concession granted subtitles for most of the film, several scenes were left un-translated; leaving it up to the audience to decipher what is taking place. Rather than detracting from the story, the archaic languages add to the flavor of the film. This is clearly a foreign time, a foreign place, and it's not always necessary to understand the mocking shouts of the Roman soldiers or the cries of the crowd to get the point across. Body language communicates far more than anything else, and in the scenes in which selected translation occurs and only a few lines are subtitled, the bits of dialogue that are translated are given far more dramatic weight and importance than they would have received otherwise. James Caviezel rises to the task of portraying Jesus Christ. His portrayal of the Christian Messiah is surprisingly human; leaving no doubt that the suffering is being inflicted upon a real man rather than just an inhuman religious figure. Gibson still obviously takes some creative liberties with his approach to the famous story. Satan is present in the garden when Judas Iscariot betrays Jesus, and he lurks in the crowd when Jesus is beaten and forced to carry his cross down the road to the hill where he is to be crucified. The additions serve to strengthen the cinematic story by introducing obvious supernatural elements and by creating an added depth to many of the characters, including Claudia Procles (Claudia Gerini) and Mary, the mother of Jesus (Maia Morgenstern). The depictions of the violence and cruelty inflicted upon Jesus throughout the film are so over the top, so incredibly vicious, that they becomes mind-numbing, nearly impossible for the average viewer to take even in this age of head-on movie gore. Jesus is beaten, whipped, beaten again, forced to drag a gigantic cross for miles in the hot sun, crucified, and then left to hang until he is dead. Gibson spared no detail in the graphic recounting of the violence that the religious leader suffered, and the result seems nearly too much for a single man to go through. Respite comes through a series of flashbacks. Though these interludes no doubt make perfect sense to Gibson's intended audience and provide a break from the unceasing violence that makes up most of the rest of the movie, they detract from the overall dramatic impact of the film. The flashbacks often are used in such a way that the result of an action is shown before the scene which establishes it. For example, Peter, one of Jesus' disciples, is shown denying his association with Jesus three times before a flashback explains the significance of the event. Much of the early controversy with the film regarded the portrayal of Jews in the movie. There is little doubt after viewing "The Passion of the Christ" that this interpretation of the story puts the responsibility for Jesus' execution on the shoulders of Jewish leaders. Pontius Pilate repeatedly tries to talk the leaders out of killing Jesus, conceding only after he realizes that rebellion is imminent if he does not give in. King Herod dismisses Jesus as a fool who should be freed. Whether in a misstep or because it did not translate well to the screen, Gibson does a poor job of communicating the fact that the leaders of the church -- and not the crowd -- were the ones who originally wanted to crucify Jesus. Dissent is shown between the leaders of the Jewish temple over what to do with Jesus, but the focus of the movie is clearly on the single man and his followers, not the people who want to see him dead. An extended explanation for their insistence on his execution is not given. "The Passion of the Christ" is a cinematic production -- a grand attempt to communicate one director's vision of an ancient story to a very particular audience. Its story does not necessarily follow the Biblical version of events and the incessant violence may occasionally seem overwhelming, but in the end, the experience may make it well worthwhile.


The Setonian
News

Milligan looks to continue Herman's success

Sky-high expectations. A heart-breaking extra-inning loss in the playoffs to end last season. A new coach who is expected not only to match, but exceed prior success. Sound familiar? No, I'm not referring to the Red Sox, but rather to our own Jumbo softball team, and its new coach Cheryl Milligan. After 16 seasons as coach, including seven consecutive NCAA tournament berths, former coach Kris Herman departed this off-season for Williams. Milligan was a natural replacement choice. After playing softball for four seasons at Tufts, she graduated from in 1995 and returned in 1997 to become an assistant coach. "It has been a pretty easy transition," senior tri-captain Deana Davidian said. "It was initially hard because our previous coach went to our biggest division rival. But we all really respect Coach Milligan as a person and her knowledge of the game." "We are totally psyched about this season," junior Courtney Bongiolatti added. "We've been confident in Coach Milligan from day one, and she was our number one choice to replace Coach Herman." Milligan takes over a team that has won three consecutive NESCAC Championships, and will be expected to continue this streak. Whereas some would find such expectations stifling, Milligan relishes this role. "Winning the NESCAC is expected for us," Milligan said. "If we didn't win, I think both the team and I would be very disappointed. I'm a new coach and I'm expected to win. Sure there is pressure but if there wasn't pressure, it wouldn't be fun. I don't feel the pressure any more than my players do." Milligan is no stranger to accomplishment. She started at shortstop every game during her Tufts career, compiling a .377 career batting average along the way. She has had success as well as an assistant by making the NCAA tournament every year since she joined the coaching ranks. This season begins a new era for Tufts softball. The team has almost never successfully existed without Herman, yet Milligan has been an integral part of this group for over a decade, and is in a unique position to carry on the legacy that has been passed to her. "We're a successful program," Milligan said. "I'm going to make changes, but there is no real need to change anything drastic. Tufts softball is still Tufts softball, especially because I've been here coaching for seven years. I have a good idea what works here, I have ideas of what to change, and now I have the ability to change them."


The Setonian
News

Amnesty retools board to increase membership

After a change of leadership, the Tufts chapter of Amnesty International will focus its energies this semester on encouraging Turkey to release a prisoner of conscience. Leyla Zahn is currently in jail for suggesting peaceful negotiations with the Kurds. The Amnesty group is organizing a letter-writing campaign, and it will be holding another "Jamnesty" concert to support the cause. The group had around 40 members last semester, but member complaints of low visibility on campus and a change of priorities by the co-presidents prompted a change in group leadership. Sophomore Natawnee Fritz is now the group's president and freshman Allison Bohm is the vice-president. One of last semester's co-presidents is still on the board as the group's treasurer. The group is also planning to host a kids' day to increase visibility on campus and in the community. "We'll use more flyers and maybe try to use Film Series [advertisements]," Fritz said. Bohm said the group hopes to "capitalize on the interest" around campus. She said the community would benefit from a more active Amnesty group because "there are enough people who feel they can make a difference." Fritz said she does not expect to encounter difficulties recruiting new members. However, she said that the number of members is not the most important factor for the group. "If we have 70 members, that's great," she said, "but I'd want at least 40 members who were genuinely interested and wanted to fight, who were dedicated."


The Setonian
News

Vagina Dialogue analyzes women's issues

Tufts marked an end to this year's Vagina Monologues week with a panel discussion entitled the Vagina Dialogue Monday night. The discussion, moderated by senior Zoe Hastings, centered around two key points: flaws in the execution of V-Day and the Vagina Monologues, and the usage of certain profane words on campus. Some objected to some thematic material in Eve Ensler's Vagina Monologues, citing the play's insistence that women can only be happy while openly sexual and in touch with their sexuality. "There really isn't a happy ending in the 'Vagina Monologues' for women who aren't that sexual," said freshman panelist Caitlin Johnson, a 'Vagina Monologues' cast member. Members of the audience and the panel, comprised of Johnson, Betsy Goldman ('05), Sam Resnik ('04), Jamie Chang ('06), and Sarah Hecht ('04), also analyzed whether V-Day alienated men. "How do we tell people this play is for women, but get men to come and understand it?" Goldman said. "V-Day hasn't done an amazing job in inviting men, and that's also true for the 'Vagina Monologues,'" Resnik said. An audience member noted that men, the main perpetrators of violence against women, are key players in the fight to end such violence. Many cast members felt that the backlash surrounding the play was directed towards them. "The negative feedback we've received this year means that there's still a necessity for this play," Hecht said. Women's Center Director Peggy Barrett, a panel audience member, noted that criticism of the play was not necessarily geared toward this particular production of the "Vagina Monologues," but rather reflected a growing political trend in the U.S. "It's important to know that there is a strong movement to stop discussion of sexuality in this country," she said. "That fact is evident in the struggle for gay marriage and the shutting down of sex education." Dean of Students Bruce Reitman, also in the audience, noted that the backlash surrounding last week's events was not as strong as it appeared. "Few people responded negatively to what's been happening. The few that did were smart and wrote press releases to newspapers and stations on the East coast," he said. "The backlash you've felt is simply campus politics -- liberal versus conservative." Reitman praised the cast of the "Vagina Monologues", claiming that "the school is supportive of you. You're brave, and you've done a wonderful thing." Some conversation centered on controversy regarding the best way to end violence against women. "There's the V-Day goal [of ending violence against women] -- and you can't disagree with that -- and then there's how to get there," senior Rachel Hoff said. "It's not the goal that's being disagreed upon." The advertisement of V-Day and "Vagina Monologues" on campus proved to be a major topic of conversation at the dialogue. "I've been offended by plenty of ads on campus, such as those for [the play] 'Debbie Does Dallas', but I accepted it. Others should too," Resnik said. The controversy surrounding the advertising campaign for the "Vagina Monolgoues" revolves around its usage of certain words that the play promotes students to "reclaim." Barrett compared the word "c**t" to the word "queer," which at one time held a strongly negative connotation towards the LGBT community, but has now been "reclaimed" and is now considered a positive word. "How are we supposed to reclaim [the word] when we can't even write it?" Resnik asked. The word is still considered profane by the Federal Communications Commision (FCC). Although the discussion raised more questions than answers surrounding the various issues of the "Vagina Monologues" and V-Day, the women's spirits remained positive. The audience, who participated in informal discussion, included Reitman, Barrett, and Judicial Affairs Director Veronica Carter as well as approximately 40 students.


The Setonian
News

Inside Fitness: The Potpourri Edition

Due to the tragic loss of the usual "Inside Fitness" columnist to the dark depths of Oxford, England for a semester, the dearly departed Ian Asaff has bestowed upon me a great honor. After a short hiatus, I have big shoes to fill during the spring of 2004 as I will attempt to tell you, the Tufts community, exactly what you want, and need, to know about personal fitness. Now to the questions ... "I'm an engineer and as you probably know, we're busy people. I'm having trouble finding time to get to the gym and when I do find some time, I'm stuck debating whether to do cardio or weights, and how much time I should spend on each. What should I do?" -- Joe Schipani, class of 2005 Well Joe, it all depends on what you're trying to achieve. If you're one of those people attempting to lose a little bit of weight before spring break, then I would suggest prioritizing your cardiovascular workout. Do the cardio first, followed by the weights. If your sole purpose is to lose weight, then you may just want to forget the weights all together for the time being until you reach your goal. But if you're trying to bulk up for the ladies, start with the weights then proceed to the cardio. It all depends on your goals: Start with whatever you think you need to work on the most so that you're feeling fresh, energized, and motivated when you begin. "I've heard that you're supposed to be able to bench press your weight. I can bench mine. Does that make me really strong?" -- Steve Leichman, class of 2006 Not at all. I believe that bench pressing one's weight is a poor measure of strength. The people who are at an advantage here are short people with short arms. Short people have to perform less mechanical work (can I get an amen for physics?) when doing the bench press because they have to move the weight a shorter distance than taller people. If you're short, say 5'9", then the fact that you can bench press ten pounds more than a taller, say 6'3", skinnier person doesn't necessarily make you stronger. In fact, the tall skinny person could be stronger than the shorter person because of the extra mechanical work needed to put up the weight. Therefore, it all depends on how you're built. Remember, weightlifting is all relative: Set your own goals for weightlifting and don't go by what someone else told you. "I'm a Tufts student abroad in England for the year and I'm trying to pick up some British women. But I'm not sure if I should work the same muscle groups together, e.g. back and biceps on the same day. What do you suggest?" -- Abroad trying to score some Brits, class of 2005 Well "Abroad," there are a couple of ways you can look at this. To look at an example: When you perform the lat pull-down exercise, you're not only working your back muscles, but also your biceps muscles. Therefore, with the right combination of back exercises, you can work your biceps without doing any exercises specific to biceps. But if you really want to work the biceps, it's OK to work them in the same workout. Just make sure you do them after your back workout. If you work the smaller biceps muscle group first, they will be extremely tired when you attempt any back exercises and your back workout will be a bust. Remember though: You don't have to work back and biceps or chest and triceps on the same day. What I sometimes try to do is to get two arm workouts in every week, without actually doing two arm workouts. What I mean is that I'll do back on Monday, for example, getting a small bicep workout in during the process and end up working biceps on Thursday or Friday, giving myself a few days to recover before proceeding with a full-fledged biceps workout. These are just a couple of suggestions for you but try them out and pick the one that works best for you.


The Setonian
News

Drake leaves void behind and at the plate

When NESCAC opponents hear the phrase "Tufts Softball," the first thing that comes to mind is offense. Every year, the Jumbos have one of the most prolific offenses in the conference, with at least three or four hitters who have the power to hit homeruns on any given pitch. For the past four years, a huge part of that offense was All-American catcher Lis Drake. "Drake was by far the best catcher in the NESCAC, and maybe even in all of division three," coach Cheryl Milligan said. Her senior season, Drake batted .387 with nine doubles, eight homeruns, 29 RBI's and 34 runs scored. She led the NESCAC in runs scored and was tied for the league in homeruns. She also broke the all time Tufts RBI mark of 110, set by Tiffany Trahan two seasons ago. Drake finished her career with 32 homeruns and 128 RBI. Her bat won't be all that will be missed, however. Drake was the Pudge Rodriguez of Division III softball, possessing one of, if not the most powerful and accurate arms from behind the plate. "I don't think anyone in the world has Lis Drake's arm," Milligan said. Very few runners tested Drake, and even fewer successfully stole a base. The catcher caught ten of 17 attempted thieves, good for an impressive .630 percentage. As good as Drake was, the Jumbos certainly have women on the squad to fill in for the loss. Moving into the catcher's slot will be senior tri-captain Julie Fox, who caught in high school but has spent the last three seasons at third base. "Julie Fox is a great player, no question," Milligan said. "Last season, she was probably the second best catcher in the NESCAC and she hardly even played the position. If she's healthy, I'm sure she won't miss a beat." Milligan is confident that Fox's stats behind the plate will be better than Drake's, due to one simple fact. "Everybody knew Lis and was scared of her arm," Milligan said. "Our opponents don't know how well Julie can throw, so they'll run more on her and she'll consistently throw them out until they realize." Although Drake will leave a void on offese, the Jumbos still have three power hitters in junior Katie Smith, Fox, and senior tri-captain Courtney Bongiolatti. They also are looking for a fourth and possibly a fifth slugger to bloom in the next three weeks of practice.


The Setonian
News

The Nader Factor

How cool would it be to have Al Pacino replace Bill Schneider or Bob Novak as a CNN political commentator for just one day? In my modest opinion, that would be a sure way to increase ratings. Every time Pacino was asked for his opinion regarding the Democratic primaries or the contentious issue of same-sex marriage, he would start out by uttering his trademark "HA" shout. He would then proceed to deliver a witty analysis of the situation at hand, embellishing it with unprintable profanities and famous quotes from "Scarface" or "The Godfather". When asked for a comment on Nader's candidacy, Mr. Pacino he would sketch a facetious smirk and simply say: "Vanity, definitely my favorite sin." I know, I know. My Pacino fantasy is a stretch, but if he actually said that, his polished remark would be right on target. By deciding to run -- yet again -- for the presidency of the United States, Ralph Nader has reminded us that it is more important for him to see his face on TV than to fight constructively for the values he claims to embrace. Therefore, if there is a "Narcissistic Man of the Year" award, I would like to nominate Ralph Nader as a deserving candidate. His announcement earlier this week that he would launch a third run for the White House considerably raised the bar for all aspiring egotists. At this point, you may be asking yourself "why is this guy rambling about Al Pacino, Nader and narcissists? What is the big deal anyway? Aren't there more important topics to be discussed, such as Carrie Bradshaw's sex life?" Well, maybe. But there are some things to be said about the so-called "Nader Factor" in this year's presidential election. OK. Let's stop. Rewind back to November 2000. The American nation is bitterly split into two camps. One camp thinks Gore is a bore, but they love Clinton so much that they are willing to vote for him. The other camp hates Clinton so much that they are willing to vote for an inarticulate and dim-witted Texas governor. The Clinton-lovers actually outnumber the Clinton-haters, albeit by a slim margin. But then good old Ralph comes along and diverts support for Gore by presenting himself as a more liberal alternative to Gore. He says that the Republican and Democratic parties essentially have a duopoly on American politics. Some liberal voters find his message appealing and they want to make a statement. However, their brave political stance -- I would say suicidal -- backfired big time. Turns out, the 2000 election was one of the closest elections in history. It all came down to Florida, which Gore lost to Bush by only 537 votes. Nader got 97, 488 votes in that state. You do the math. I am not a big fan of "what if" questions, but if only a small fraction of Nader voters -- say, 538 of them -- had decided to vote with their heads rather than their hearts, Al Gore would be president of the United States. Suffice it to say, there were plenty of cases of voter's regret in Florida the next morning. Fast-forward to February 2004. Green Party sympathizers realized they had wasted precious votes. They wanted to make a statement and what they got instead was the least environmentally-friendly administration ever and an ultra-conservative president (whatever happened to compassionate conservatism?). The nation remains bitterly divided, and all signs point to an exceptionally close presidential race in November. The Democrats are aware that this one is an uphill battle for them, but just when they were beginning to think that liberals throughout the country were united behind the Democrats' cause, Ralph Nader crashed the party and resurrected old ghosts from the 2000 election fiasco. Will he do it again? Will he be responsible for another ruinous loss for the Democrats this coming election? His bid for the White House has certainly sent shivers down the spines of prominent Democrats. And Karl Rove could not be happier right now. D‚j... vu all over again. But wait a minute. Can history repeat itself? How serious is this "Nader Factor?" My instinct tells me it will not matter much this time around. Nader voters in the 2000 election may be stubborn, but they are not idiots. They have learned their lesson the hard way. They must have heard the phrase "see, I told you" a million times by now. Most of them will not make the same mistake twice, unless they are masochists. Apparently one man did not learn any lessons -- Nader himself. But who cares? I suspect he will not even get a third of the votes he got last time. I kind of feel sorry for the guy. He really looks pathetic, and in the eyes of many voters, he has lost all credibility. Fighting to end the duopoly of the Democratic-Republican establishment is a worthy cause, and Nader should be commended for his activism in that regard. But sometimes you need to assess the reality of the situation and be pragmatic. It is not about giving up your principles; it is about being smart. Rodrigo De Haro is a senior majoring in International Relations. He can be reached at deharo@tuftsdaily.com.


The Tufts Daily Crossword with an image of a crossword puzzle
The Print Edition
Tufts Daily front page