Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Alzugaray explores Cuba in the '90s

Critical of current US policy toward Cuba, former Cuban Ambassador to the European Union Dr. Carlos Alzugaray told students Wednesday that Cubans "have a different way of looking at democracy." Almost 50 students and faculty members gathered to hear the former Ambassador's first-hand perspective about life on the island in a lecture entitled "Cuba in the '90s: the Aftermath of the Collapse of the Soviet Block." Saying that Cuba was "uncomfortable" with the political structure popularized among socialist countries by the USSR during the Cold War, Alzugaray attempted to distinguish the modern Cuban form of communism from the older Soviet ideology. Even though Cuba is just 90 miles offshore from Florida, many Americans are unaware of the internal workings of the country, Alzugaray said. The US government has severely restricted American travel to the country and placed a strict embargo on Cuban imports for many years. Alzugaray's talk focused on the ability of the socialist economy to withstand external shocks in the last decade, and where he sees the future of American-Cuban relations heading. Alzugaray said that Cuba is the only economy to suffer "two major economic upheavals in a 30-year period." Before 1959, Cuba depended largely on American imports. But when Castro took power the US imposed a strict embargo, cutting off almost all trade with the country over a three-year period. After the fall of the Soviet Union, the Cuban economy lost significant Soviet subsidies, creating a decline in gross domestic product of at least 35 percent between 1989 and 1993. "In the face of absolute American hostility towards Cuba, the only choice was to find support somewhere else," Alzugaray said. When the Soviet Union fell, Alzugaray said, Cuba had to overcome significant structural changes to its economy. In a very short period of time, the country lost almost all of its foreign investments. Alzugaray cited the growth of the Cuban oil industry as an example of Cuba's ability to recover. "We realized we had things in Cuba we were not exploiting," he said. Cuba's oil and natural gas industry produces 60 percent of the oil used in the country today, which was all previously imported. Alzugaray said it was surprising that the US continues the embargo with Cuba, even though the Soviet Union no longer exists. The relationship Cuba shared with Russia was highly criticized by various US administrations, and contributed to the American animosity towards the country. Alzugaray jested that the US and Cuba have striking cultural similarities. "You love baseball, we love baseball. You love jeans, we love jeans," he said. Recently, the US has lifted part of the embargo against Cuba, allowing the country to import from the US but not export. Alzugaray said Cuba now buys 60 million dollars in food and 60 million dollars in medicine from the US. Former US president Jimmy Carter will soon visit the country in the hopes of improving relations. Alzugaray says it is a step in the right direction, though he is not sure what the ultimate effect will be. "When he returns, I don't know if the present administration is going to pay any attention to what he has to say," Alzugaray said. After speaking, Alzugaray stopped for nearly an hour of questions and debate. When one student asked what would happen when Fidel Castro - the man who has held an iron grip over the country for the last 43 years - was dead, Alzugaray joked, "Well the first thing we are going to do is have a funeral." He followed that by saying he expects that Castro, 75, will die in power- even though the past ten US administrations have tried to oust him- and that this will cause some change in the structure of the country. "Never when such a leader has died in power has there been an upheaval," he said citing other leaders like Stalin and Lenin. He also said the Cuban people have worked hard to maintain their socialist government. "The 11 million Cubans in Cuba have had something to do with what Cuba is today," Alzugaray said. "It is the work of many people, a generation." In contrast to the US, Alzugaray said that Cubans enjoy free healthcare, free access to higher education, and low-cost food and housing. Cuba has one of the world's lowest infant mortality rates. When asked about human rights in the country, Alzugaray said Cubans enjoy the same freedom of speech and freedom of religion as US residents but that there are strict punishments for those who do something against the government. "It's a way that we have to defend ourselves," he said. Alzugaray said that if US attempts to overthrow the government were relaxed, Cubans would enjoy more freedom. Students said that while Alzugaray was informative, they felt the former ambassador gave a view of the country that was hard to believe. "As a child of Cuban-American exiles, I felt he portrayed several fair points but he didn't answer questions fairly about human rights and political dissidence," sophomore Dan Perez said. "Those are important issues as to why Cuba hasn't achieved better status with the US." Sophomore Joe Bodell agreed. "I thought he addressed American perceptions and misperceptions well, but he did kind of skirt political issues," he said. The event was co-sponsored by the International Relations, Latin American Studies, and Political Science departments as well as the Latino center.@s:Former Ambassador says Cubans enjoy similar speech and religious freedoms as Americans


The Setonian
News

Clinton tickets to be distributed Friday and Monday

Half of the 1,900 undergraduate and graduate tickets for former President Bill Clinton's March 13 speech will be distributed between noon and 5 p.m. in the lobbies of Dowling Hall and the campus center on Friday. The second half will be available, while they last, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. on Monday and Tuesday. Seating for the lecture will be first-come first-serve, and will begin next Wednesday promptly at 4 p.m. All students must be seated by 4:20 p.m. Tickets for the event - which will be held in the Gantcher Convocation Center - are free of charge. Students will be allowed to obtain a maximum of two tickets, but must provide ID cards for both themselves and the second student. Tufts officials will electronically track distribution to prevent students from obtaining multiple tickets. Clinton will speak as part of the annual Issam M. Fares Lecture series, which has previously brought to campus such speakers as former President George H. Bush, now-Secretary of State Colin Powell, and former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. Clinton is expected to discuss the future of America and globalization in the 21st century. Seating for the Fares lecture was filled to capacity last year when Powell spoke. But some, including Tufts Community Union (TCU) President Eric Greenberg, expect there will be more people at Clinton's speech, judging from the high level of student interest. Greenberg said students' strong interest in hearing former President Clinton speak probably stems from his political presence. Regardless of people's opinions of the former president, they are asking for tickets. "It's one of those speakers that everyone gets excited about whether they like him or not," he said. While tickets will be distributed on a first-come, first-serve basis, some students have already been guaranteed seats. For example, members of the Senior Leadership Corps - all seniors - will have access to tickets as a reward for working all year on senior-related projects, according to senior Lindsay Braun. If any tickets remain on Wednesday morning, they will be available between 9 a.m. and 1 p.m. Anyone who requires handicapped entry will be allowed in at 3:45 p.m.


The Setonian
News

The cost of cutting class

An empty seat among a sea of faces or a disapproving look from one's professor are about the only repercussions of skipping a college class. There are no detentions, no extra homework assignments, and no meetings with the teacher or the assistant principle for one missed class. When the immediate ramifications are negligible, students find several reasons for cutting class. For some, cutting class is a win-win situation - it means more free time and little, if any punishment. And with notes available online and huge lectures lending to anonymity, the opportunities are considerable. Is there a cost? Monetarily, yes. The average tuition per semester at Tufts is $17,000. In a single semester, the typical student attends four classes an average of three times per week - with 15 weeks in a semester, this tuition averages out to about $95 per class. Of course, tuition is funneled elsewhere, but cutting classes nonetheless does not come cheap. The economics, in fact, keep many students from cutting."I try not to cut class because I feel like I am wasting my parents' money," freshman Erin Zuena said. "It's hard, though, because some of my classes are very pointless to go to."Even students not deterred by the costly numbers are amazed. When told the potential cost of classes, freshman Hollen Spatz said she felt guilty. "I probably throw out at least 200 dollars a week," she said.Spatz said her time commitment to the swimming team and other activities sometimes keep her from class. "I'm too tired and have too much other stuff to do and not enough time," she said. Time and money aside, some students say they skip class simply because attendance does not affect their grade or professors make it easy to learn the material outside the classroom. Sophomore Lex Margolin found it difficult to attend an astronomy class due to the feasibility of learning the material outside of class. "I never went to astro because it didn't change my grade at all," she said. "I just handed in the assignments because they were usually straight from the textbook." She added that she cut because classes were early and far from her dorm. "And because I could, basically." Early into this semester, freshman Sangeeta Parekh realized the benefits of online notes in a class she is taking. "For one of my classes this semester, there were days when I just didn't feel like going to class," she said. "And I feel less bad about cutting because the professor puts the notes on the Internet." With that kind of convenience, students pressed for time often can't resist cutting class. For some, when time runs thin, classes are among the first things to go from their busy schedule.Freshman Seth Baron says he tries hard to attend all of his classes. "I don't really cut classes," he said. "But when I do it's usually for a reason, like a lot of work in other classes or that I'm sick." Those students who resist cutting class say their learning style necessitates attendance. Sophomore Elyssa Rosenberg tries to attend most of her classes because that's how she feels she can learn the course material best."I learn better by instruction," Rosenberg said. Students, of course, are not the only ones affected by truancy. Professors, who of course can't so easily cut out of class, often resent absences. And many take steps to prevent them.At the beginning of the semester, many professors stress class attendance by factoring participation into grading and saying students who skip class do poorly on exams. Many students say this correlation is one the strongest reasons they attend classes, money matters aside. Regardless of student motivations, some departments - particularly those which offer many small classes - do more to enforce attendance. Professor Agnes Trichard-Arany of the French Department has little to worry about when it comes to cuts, because only three are acceptable in foreign language classes, and both the students and the departments watch attendance closely. "It's compulsory - students are supposed to come," she said. "I think because I check on presence, students know that it's going to affect their final grade if they miss more than three classes."


The Setonian
News

Awaiting a partner for peace

Two recent encounters on this campus have compelled me to write down my thoughts on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The first happened several Fridays ago. Arab students set up a display of maps and flags outside the campus center in order to promote awareness of the Palestinian cause. I, being an optimistic and dedicated supporter of a large-scale peace process, stopped by and opened dialogue with some of the students. I was not surprised by most of the arguments until the topic of suicide bombers came up. At that point, I was admittedly taken aback by a fellow student explaining that seeing her innocent father searched time and again at Israeli checkpoints led even her, on several occasions, to thoughts of a suicide attack. The second encounter was this past week at a panel discussion in Hotung about the conflict in the Middle East. In her concluding remarks, one of the students representing the Arab side explained that before she took part in dialogues with Jewish students on this issue, she called the attackers "freedom fighters". Now, she says, she has learned that these suicide attacks do not work, and she therefore no longer considers them a useful tactic in a struggle for peace. That was her warm and fuzzy concluding remark to a warm and fuzzy panel discussion. This scares me. It more than scares me, actually - it disgusts me. Suicide bombers are not the answer because they do not work? No. Suicide bombers aren't the answer because they are wrong. Strapping a bomb to your body and walking into a crowded school, a bus, a caf?©, a club, with the hopes of killing as many innocent people as possible is unacceptable no matter what horrible circumstances you are in. Have the Israelis done bad things in this conflict too? Yes. The difference is that no legitimate Jewish leader in the world is happy about those things. They consider it a horrible side effect of protection. Israelis are trying to get rid of terrorists and regret every innocent life they accidentally kill in the process. The Palestinians have a different set of standards. Am I claiming moral superiority in this conflict? I certainly am. I am a moral absolutist when it comes down to it, and the values of the Palestinian governing bodies and much of the world Arab leadership is absolutely out of line. You want to know the difference in the value systems between the Palestinians and Israelis? Here it is. For 54 years going, from day one until now, elementary school students in Israel come home from school to their parents and show them the pictures of doves that they drew in class. Turn on Israeli radio - there's nothing to hide. Even if you speak no Hebrew, you'll hear one word over and over again. That word is shalom - peace. It overwhelms the music. It overwhelms the prayer, too. Jews end their most important prayer three times a day with a plea for peace in this world. And here's the kicker. We said that same prayer in Auschwitz. We say that same prayer in French synagogues as they are destroyed by anti-Semitic attacks. We said that same prayer from day one, say it today, and will say it again tomorrow. Shall we compare? What are they learning in Arafat's elementary schools? Is it peace or is it guns? And what are they playing on radio and television throughout the Arab world? Is it songs of peace? And what are they praying for, victory or peace? I can proudly say that as an 18-year old deeply invested in the prospect of peace, I could propose to do a project in support of peace efforts, and funds would flow out from the Jewish world to help me through it. What can an 18-year old Palestinian youth do to get money flowing from the Arab world? We know very well how he can get money from his beloved leader, Yasser Arafat, don't we? All he has to do is strap explosives to his chest and run into a bunch of Israelis. If Israel is dealing with a Palestinian leader whose only reason for curbing suicide bombers is that it is not working, we have a big problem. Anyone who thinks that suicide bombings should stop for a reason other than that they are absolutely wrong is not a partner for peace. That belief is morally repulsive and despicable. I, for one, will continue to hope, pray, and work towards peace in every way I can. I will continue to talk, I will continue to listen. But what needs to happen without delay is for the Palestinian leadership along with Syria, Iraq, Iran, and yes, even Saudi Arabia, to reexamine their ethics, to stop encouraging suicide bombers, to stop professing a doctrine of hate to their school children. In the meantime, the Israelis will continue to protect themselves from terrorism with one hand, and in the other hand, they will hold their olive branch and their dove; and they will wait for you to join them.Eitan Hersh is an undeclared freshman.


The Setonian
News

After big win, men prepare to face Williams

After defeating Bowdoin 10-8 in one of the biggest wins in recent memory for the men's lacrosse team, the Jumbos now prepare to face NESCAC rival Williams College on Saturday. Williams is 3-2 overall with a 1-1 NESCAC mark, and currently is tied for fifth place in the conference with Trinity and Bates. Tufts, meanwhile, is tied for first place in the NESCAC with Colby and national powerhouse Middlebury, with a 4-1 (2-0 NESCAC) record. Last year, the Jumbos knocked off Williams by a score of 7-4 for their first conference victory of the season, after opening the season 0-2 in the NESCAC. This year the Jumbos head into the game on a roll, and will look to maintain their undefeated conference record. Tufts may have its hands full with an Ephs squad that is no stranger to close games. Williams fell to Bowdoin in triple overtime on March 19 by a score of 9-8. Bowdoin scored the game winner in the final second of the third OT. Similarly, in its only NESCAC victory of the season, Williams defeated Bates College 14-13 in overtime on March 30. The Williams offense, which averages nearly 12 goals per game, is led by junior attacker Chris Hayes, who has accumulated 12 points so far this season in the form of 10 goals and two assists. Senior co-captain midfielder Peter Thompson also has 12 points, though in the reverse form of Hayes, with 10 assists and 2 goals. Tufts' offense has been slightly more productive than the Ephs', averaging 14.2 goals per game. Jon Zissi and Bryan Griffin lead the Jumbo attack, with 21 points each thus far this season. Griffin boasts 14 goals and seven assists, while Zissi has racked up 15 goals and six assists. Both teams play stingy defense, with Tufts allowing 8.8 goals per game, and Williams giving up 8.75. A key to the game will be goalie play. Tufts' net minder, senior Kirk Lutwyler, currently leads the NESCAC in goals against average (GAA), at 7.18, to go along with a .638 save percentage. The Ephs' goal keeper, sophomore Matt Rade, sits back in eighth place with a 10.5 GAA and .521 save percentage. While the teams match up well on paper, it is the match up on the field that will decide the winner. The Jumbos are carrying a two-game winning streak, both wins coming against strong, proven programs, including a Bowdoin team ranked second in New England and 15th in the nation. After nearly falling at the hands of Gordon on March 27, the Jumbos have been a completely different team, playing more disciplined and fundamentally sound lacrosse. Against Gordon, Tufts made numerous errant passes, scrambled wildly after loose balls, and played too passively on defense. Only a late fourth quarter goal from senior Jim Mandler secured the Jumbo win against a team ranked outside the top 15 in New England. Further contributing to the team's struggles against Gordon were the suspensions of a number of players for disciplinary reasons. These suspensions, however, may have been exactly what the Jumbos needed - all team members seem to be playing harder and with more dedication since the violations. Following the team's victory at Trinity, Griffin said, "[Gordon] was definitely a wake up call. It showed us that maybe we needed to work a little harder and focus a little more. Our next practices were some of the best we've had all year." This revitalization was apparent against Bowdoin, as the Jumbos effectively shut down one of the top teams in the nation. Tufts' defense showed a great deal of poise, not allowing the Polar Bears to make a run and get back in the game. Meanwhile, the offense dissected the Bowdoin defense, outscoring the Bears 7-0 in the second quarter. Passes that went astray against Gordon were crisp and found their mark against Bowdoin, and players around the crease never stopped moving, making cut after cut in front of the goal. But perhaps the biggest factor against Bowdoin was the team's energy level. While many players appeared indifferent against Gordon, all were alert and hustling against the much stronger Polar Bear squad. The team will need to maintain the same level of intensity against Williams. The Ephs are able to hang around in games and remain poised even late in overtime periods, as evidenced by the victory against Bates. A win against Williams is almost essential, as the Jumbos will need to maintain their momentum heading into next week's game against Middlebury, the top ranked team in the nation. If Tufts can ride its wave past Williams, it should be in good shape to face the Panthers in one of the biggest games of the year. Tufts and Williams square off at 1 p.m. on Saturday at home.


The Setonian
News

Harvard professor receives Mayer award for infectious disease research

The state of relations between drug companies, governments, and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) was at the center of a Friday EPIIC panel entitled Pandemics and Inequities: AIDS, Infectious Diseases and Economics in the Developing World. According to moderator Lauren Katz, the panel was aimed at addressing the "interface" between pharmaceutical companies that produce treatments and vaccines, and governments and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that work to prevent and treat pandemics in developing countries. Harvard Medical School's Paul Farmer, who topped the list of four panelists, received the Jean Mayer Global Citizenship Award for his work in infectious and parasitic disease prevention and treatment. Calling Farmer's work a "live account of what can be done in seemingly overwhelming odds," colloquium member junior Gina Jibrin, who presented Farmer with the award, lauded his work in raising awareness on global public health emergencies. Farmer pointed to the estimated 40 million cases of HIV worldwide - more than 95 percent of which occur in developing countries - and said that prevention programs alone are not sufficient in fighting the pandemic because they ignore the millions already living with HIV. "Prevention and treatment are part of a continuum," he said. To set the stage for discussion, panel moderator and EPIIC colloquium member Caroline Kelly said, "it is important to consider disparities in the health status of people throughout the world, many of whom are living without access to health care." Panelists included Norman Daniels, Tufts' Goldthwaite Professor in the department of Philosophy and professor of Medical Ethics in the department of community medicine. Daniels posed questions to the other panelists in order to encourage discussion. He asked them to discuss the likelihood of solving medical problems without any medical resources. "What country in sub-Saharan Africa does not face some kind of problem?" he asked. Participant John McGoldrick, Executive Vice President for Law and Strategic Planning and General Counsel of pharmaceutical company Bristol-Myers Squibb, said his pharmaceutical company, which aims to "extend and enhance human life," works to provide the needed medical resources. He said the company would not let patents get in the way of providing treatment to poverty-stricken sufferers. McGoldrick recently assumed responsibility of the company's HIV/AIDS initiatives in Africa. He called the HIV/AIDS pandemic "the worst, or among the worst things to befall humanity that we have any record of." Sherman Katz, the William M. Scholl Chair in International Business at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, added his perspective to the forum. Katz addressed the difficulty of setting up an international trade infrastructure that will support intellectual property rights and promote medical research and advancement. This infrastructure must also allow less developed nations to confront health problems, Katz said. He is the author of TRIPS and Pharmaceuticals, and was involved in the "Declaration on the TRIPS agreement and Public Health" made in November at the World Trade Organization Ministerial Meeting. Farmer, an "internationally respected health expert," as Jibrin called him, is co-director of the Program in Infectious Disease and Social Change at Harvard Medical School where he heads the International Working Group on Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB). Farmer graduated from Harvard University in 1990 with both an MD and a Ph.D. and is now professor of medical anthropology at Harvard Medical School. He is medical director of Clinique Bon Sauveur in Haiti and of an MDR-TB treatment program in urban Peru. He has authored multiple books, most recently The Modern Plagues, and is co-founder and executive director of Partners in Health, which sponsors clinics and services in Haiti, Mexico, Russia, Peru, and Roxbury, MA.



The Setonian
News

Iranian ambassador provides insight into diplomacy, development, Kyoto

Criticizing the Bush administration and emphasizing multilateral action, His Excellency Iranian Ambassador Bagher Asadi spoke Thursday at Fletcher about the pressures and difficulties of international diplomacy and the future of international development post-Kyoto protocol - the international treaty on carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction. Professor William Moomaw of the Fletcher School invited the Ambassador. "I had done some work with the G-77 [a coalition within the United Nations of China and 132 developing countries] and mentioned to him that it would be great for him to come to Fletcher," Moomaw said. Although Asadi's background is in economics - a BA at the University of Tehran and an MA from the University of Colorado - he is a respected diplomat. He served on the Iranian Permanent Mission to the US as the representative in charge of economics and social affairs. Most recently, he served as the Chairman of the G-77. The ambassador began his speech by referring to the vision of Austin Barclay Fletcher, the original donor to the Fletcher School. "I feel that I should embody [Fletcher's] vision," Asadi said. "That is why I am a diplomat, a multilateral diplomat: because I believe law and diplomacy can make a difference." Asadi went on to emphasize the importance of multilateralism through his experiences with the G-77 after the US withdrew support for the Kyoto protocol in the spring of 2001. The protocol, supported by Democratic candidate Al Gore, established CO2 limits for developed nations, including the European Union, Norway, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Russia, and Japan. "The most important process within development is climate change and the Kyoto protocol," he said. "Like many other international agreements, it has been elusive." The US is responsible for 25 percent of the world's CO2 emissions, and the US retraction of support was viewed as a huge step back to the process. Asadi described it as "complicating the picture." "Problems arose," Asadi said. "Because the developing world was not involved per se in the negotiations, the developing world was exempt from targeting CO2 emissions." According to Asadi, the issue was further complicated diplomatically "because the umbrella nations [other nations who signed onto the protocol] did not want to criticize Washington, nor could they endorse it. However, this unilateral action received serious opposition from the EU." The problem then became to find a consensus among the G-77 nations in response to the US policy change. "Some quarters expressed satisfaction with the American decision. Namely some OPEC [Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries] nations. They had fears that with ratification of Kyoto that demand for oil would be negatively impacted. They would not favor early implementation of Kyoto. Iran was not one of these." Faced with the potential of a split within the G-77, Asadi felt that coming to a consensus was imperatively important. "I felt that American policy should have been denounced because it ignored legitimate, credible and valid concerns," he said. Asadi said that these concerns were also shared by "the small island nations... they see more clearly than others the effects of sea level changes." Asadi believes the protocol should not be altered, and he criticized the Bush administration's "unilateral approach and withdrawal from a unilateral commitment as unacceptable and disappointing." With a small smile, he noted, "As always and in all circumstances, it takes two to tango. I am, of course, no expert in tango." Asadi believes the G-77 will come to a consensus on the protocol. "A triumph of multilateralism over unilateralism," he called it. "We proved that we stayed true to our principles while staying flexible."


The Setonian
News

Frisbee teams glide to second place finishes

Both the men's and women's ultimate frisbee teams came away with second-place finishes at last weekend's tournament at UMass-Amherst. The strong finishes come at a perfect time for both teams since they started out the regular season slow and hope to gain momentum with only one tournament left before the playoffs in late April. The men's squad cruised through the 23-team tournament, winning every game up until the finals, when it lost to host UMass. For the Jumbos, the result was great since they were missing two key components: senior Neil Pallaver and sophomore Matt Abbrecht. "We have to attribute the solid finish to strong legs," junior Ian Schneider said. "Missing two good players like Matt and Neil meant that the reserves had to step up and play more throughout the tournament, which they did and they did well." The team's reserves are credited for helping Tufts gain momentum in the latter portion of the season. The team started the season with two mediocre finishes, one at Stanford University and the other in Atlanta. After the first two meets, the team had a 5-8 record. Over spring break the team started gelling and picked up the slack at a UNC Wilmington Tournament where they advanced to the semifinals. "We have improved because the younger guys are playing more," Schneider said. "We are able to sub them in more often and still run our main offense. All of team members are on the same page so we have the ability to put in fresh legs without missing a step." The Jumbos latest finish at UMass came at a perfect time, as the squad is now geared up to play in this weekend's tournament, the Yale Cup. The Jumbos play in the New England Region of the Ultimate Players Association (UPA), and at this tournament they will face some of the strongest teams from the region, including their two biggest rivals, Brown and Harvard. "We beat Harvard once this year, but we know that both Brown and Harvard will get up big time to play this game," Schneider said. "We will really be able to gauge where we are in terms of Regionals and Nationals from this tournament," senior Mike Zalisk said. "A solid performance at Yale could mean good things when the playoffs roll around." The playoffs begin April 27 at Tufts. The first phase is Sections, where the Jumbos will play the seven other teams from the Metro-Boston Section. The top four teams from each of the five sections advance to a 20 team Regional playoff. The top one to three teams in the region than advance to play at Nationals. Only the UPA can decide how many teams from a region can advance. For the women, their finish at UMass was exciting as they also lost only one game. They placed second, losing to rival MIT in the finals. The women also started their season slowly, but the emergence of several young players has helped them to perform better down the stretch. "Freshmen Emily Estrada, Emily Kaplin, and Liesbeth Gallon have really come on strong, allowing us to play them more and stay fresh the whole game," senior captain Liz Korb said. The team struggled in the first meet at Stanford and then started seeing a change over the two spring break tournaments in Atlanta and North Carolina. "We started practicing better and the younger players really started to excel under the leadership of the veterans on the team," sophomore Amanda Sommers said. The women's team will also travel to Yale to compete against the stronger teams in the region. The Jumbos are excited to play their rivals, Brown and MIT. Though the team has lost to both rivals this season, Korb feels confident in the rematches. "Our loses to them this year were not representative of our team," she said. "We will be fired up if we meet them this weekend." A strong performance by the team will help it as it enters sections at the end of this month. The team is confident that it can pass through sections easily and go on to Regionals. Making it to Nationals might be hard for the squad but if its play continues to improve, as it has throughout the season, then the Jumbos will have a legitimate shot at advancing. The postseason starts on the weekend of April 27 and 28 here at Tufts. Both the men and the women hope they will begin a strong playoff run from their own home fields and continue all the way to Nationals in Spokane, WA.


The Setonian
News

Hits and Misses

The Franc Graham Band Sugar TreeTake Easy3/5 Franc Graham knows what sounds good, but unfortunately, she isn't instantly exciting. While pleasing to the ear, the songs on Sugar Tree tend to blend together on first listen. They start off slowly, with a mellow, simple chords and a straightforward bass line. After about a half-minute introduction, Graham joins in with her bluesy vocals, which very could well be the strongest element of the album. She uses her voice well, her gravelly alto fitting in well with the harmonica that sometimes plays backup. Her slow, casual sound results in a very pleasant, if rather undifferentiated, listening experience. The music uses an odd blend of musical effects, from the aforementioned harmonica to a brief appearance of turntables. It appears that Franc Graham is trying to follow in the footsteps of other female artists in the likes of Lucinda Williams and Emmylou Harris, who have gained notoriety as of late. She certainly makes an excellent effort, but doesn't quite manage to distance herself from sounding derivative. - Alex MoerleinRichard ShindellCourierSignature Sounds4/5 The liner notes of Richard Shindell's Courier show him performing in jeans, sport coat, and a button down. But I bet when he's sitting around at home writing music, he wears corduroys. His tunes - the lyrics, melodies, and soft rhythms that lazily waft through the album from beginning to end - have that feel, that warm, comfortable, style-conscious, rainy-days-inspire-me-to-write kind of feel. And they fit him just right. A Long Island native, Shindell has written for and toured with Joan Baez over the years while working independently on his own folk projects. This disc rocks with the wilting lyrical bent of Adam Duritz, and the rough-hewn hard knocks growl of Bruce Springsteen. Shindell's guitar work is soft and subtle, while his band, with occasional violin accompaniment, complements his strumming. But this poet's true talent lies in his passion and flair for storytelling. The events and people that crowd his tunes are sometimes pitiful, sometimes inspiring, frequently desperate, and always sweetly human. - Rob Lott Suspect DeviceBoston MassacrePigpile3/5 Suspect Device's Boston Massacre tosses together a bunch of rebellious punk songs. From the opening "Brass Tacks," which states objection to the typical boring life, to the closing "Over Your Head," which decries standard methods of criminal investigation, Suspect Device does nothing but complain. "Carry On," the most original song, deviates from the punk standard used by The Ramones, Green Day, and the rest of this album. But Suspect Device still can't evade the whiny subject matter. It's not all so bad, though. On "Sunday Morning 3AM," the band infuses a ska sound, making for a good start that could have been further developed. Overall, however, the album is fun to listen to. The lyrics are barely distinguishable, but there's a lot of energy in the performance. Plus, they're so caught up complaining about life in general that they avoid entering the pop domain of songs about women - something this reviewer appreciated. - Seth Kaufman


The Setonian
News

Getting ready to make a splash at Avalon

Few rock shows today involve fiddles, accordions, concertinas, bouzukis, guitars, and drums. Great Big Sea, however, isn't like most other bands in the Boston music scene; it has bucked convention for ten years by playing upbeat Celtic folk music to packed houses. Formed in 1991, the band consists of four members: Bob Hallett, Alan Doyle (vocals, guitar, keyboards), S?©an McCann (bondran, tin whistle, guitar), and Darrell Power (bass and acoustic guitar). Its style is a true divergence from the current norm, following neither the mediocre rock nor the not-so-deep folk music staples of the music world. According to Hallet, this Canadian band was destined for musical stardom. "We played with all sorts of different instruments, just as kids play with hockey sticks and bikes," he said. "We all grew up playing traditional music in our families; it was just the way it was in our town. All of the adults would just get together and start playing a variety of instruments, and eventually, we children just began to start playing around on all sorts of instruments." Family support helped contribute to the band's musical destiny. "It never occurred to us that it would be hard to make a living as a band, in part because our parents never discouraged us from trying to do so," said Hallett. Described by Hallett as "a really aggressive folk band that marries traditional Celtic music with modern rhythms," Great Big Sea has changed over the years since the release of its first self-titled LP in 1992. The band started with a more simple, slavish approach to folk music, and has added new elements to create a style that is more listenable and complex. One reason the band has been able to add more variety to its music is because of additional studio time. On Great Big Sea's most recent release, Sea of No Cares, band members did not go into the studio simply to record pre-polished material - the extra time they had to work led to more creativity. According to Hallett, a Great Big Sea's stage show is more exciting than its album perfornamces. "The focus in concerts is on the four of us and our playing," he said. "There's a lot of variety and energy that you see in a concert which can't obviously be conveyed on a record." The band has played literally thousands of concerts over their career; it has both the experience and confidence that many newer artists don't have. All of the onstage time has led to a fair share of public mishaps. When asked the group's most embarrassing moment on stage, Hallett replied with somewhat of a laugh. "We've played so many shows...We've been through just about everything. From getting the hiccups while singing a ballad, to coming out with your fly down, to stepping out on a chord causing everything to fall down...We've pretty much experienced it all." For Great Big Sea, the best part of living the life of a rock star is also the worst part - traveling. While Hallett has loved seeing amazing places that he probably otherwise would never have visited, he says that being on the road can get very boring, especially since it's how the band spends most of its time right now. But what he cherishes most is having played music that he loves with good friends for over a decade. "We have nothing to do with hippies in the back of the classroom; our music is really exciting."


The Setonian
News

A generation of apathy?

For all the debate about civic engagement, active citizenship, and leadership, our generation is more disconnected from public affairs than almost any other this century. In 1996, during the Vietnam war and urban rioting across the country, 66 percent of Americans rejected the view that "the people running this country don't really care what happens to you." In 1997, during unprecedented economic growth and peace, 57 percent of Americans agreed with that same statement, according to social scientist Robert Putnam in his recent book "Bowling Alone". The US has one of the most open governments in the word, yet the trends suggest Americans are becoming involved less and less with their leadership. Check-writing is replacing activism just as mass-marketing is replacing campaigning. It is old news that voting, the most basic form of political action, is unpopular in America. 1996 and 2000 saw nearly the lowest voter turnout in 100 years - lower than most other democracies. Voting requires relatively little effort and time, meaning that those who do not vote are unlikely to be engaged in politics in a more demanding way such as grassroots activism or organization. At the same time, spending on political campaigns is skyrocketing. Each new year sets the new heights of fundraising - more and more money is going in and a smaller and smaller percentage of people are voting. Today, the average college graduate knows little more about politics than the average high-school graduate in the '40s, according to a 1995 Harvard study. This trend is generational - people who were involved tend to stay involved throughout their lives and vice versa, meaning that the current generation will continue to be aloof from politics when they are entering the height of their careers. Similarly, people coming of age in the '80s and '90s are substantially less politically aware than their predecessors, despite the rapid growth of news sources. While two-thirds of people under 35 read a newspaper every day in 1965, only one third did in 1990, according to a Times Mirror Company study. The Roper Social and Political Trends Survey - a monthly study of people's political engagement from 1973 to 1994 - hints at the same thing. Of 12 different political activities, from signing a petition to attending a rally to running for office, people are doing less and less of each. Americans were half as likely to work in a campaign or attend a rally in the '90s than they were in the '70s. During the same time, the number of people running for public office shrank by 15 percent. This means there are fewer players and fewer spectators - not the healthiest thing for democracy. On the other hand, recent years have seen a flourishing of political organizations, from Common Cause to the NRA to the Sierra Club to the Moral Majority. Though there are more groups than ever, their nature has changed. Few national organizations maintain local chapters anymore, preferring instead to operate centrally from Washington where they have quick access to lawmakers. Although this allows people to support a myriad of issues they might otherwise not have time for, it is essentially democracy by proxy. Instead of being engaged ourselves, we are hiring others to do it for us. While membership in political organizations has been halved between 1967 and 1987, the number of people who contribute financially to causes has essentially doubled. Being a member of an organization such as the Sierra Club or NRA now means writing a check every year instead of becoming personally involved in an issues. Greenpeace was at its peak in 1990 because of an aggressive mailing campaign, becoming the largest environmental organization in the country. Worried that using so much paper in junk mail was hypocritical, they scaled back their direct marketing and by 1998, their membership had decreased by 85 percent, according to Dr. Putnam. The internet, while allowing people to be vastly more connected and informed, has also allowed people to be involved in a more superficial way. Instead of going out to their communities and taking action directly, people can send a form letter to a member of congress simply by visiting a web page. Although the Internet has made each organization more effective at mobilizing short-term political action, it has meant less actual personal involvement for most people. Mass movements that rely too much on virtual membership have little staying power since their supporters have few substantial ties to them. Whereas being a part of the freedom summer in the '60s might have been a life-changing experience, few members of today's political organizations even know what their group does on a daily basis. People's alliance to political causes has become more tenuous and abstract. The promise keepers, for instance, organized a mass rally in 1997 that 500,000 people attended - supposedly the largest gathering ever of a religious group in America yet as soon as it was over, the Promise Keepers nearly collapsed, laying off their entire staff. So fewer people are voting, reading the papers, following current events or actively taking part in politics - so what? After all, perhaps this aloofness is a tacit stamp of approval on our government. The again, complacency is hardly what Jefferson, Madison and Washington had in mind. Fewer people caring about government means fewer people caring about quality control.


The Setonian
News

Deans Dunn, Kanarek settle into new roles

As Kevin Dunn and Robin Kanarek settle into their elevated roles in the Arts and Sciences hierarchy - Dean of Academic Affairs and Dean of the Graduate School, respectively - students and faculty alike are considering the implications of this latest wave of University President Larry Bacow's administrative overhaul. In letters to the Arts and Sciences faculty announcing the appointments, Dean of Arts and Sciences Susan Ernst highlighted both professors' administrative experience and popularity as testaments to their ability to lead efficiently without losing touch with students. Dunn, Ernst, and Kanarek fill the void left behind by Vice President of Arts, Sciences and Technology Mel Bernstein, who left Tufts last summer. Often criticized by professors for what they saw as his overbearing leadership style, Bernstein left a University where many faculty members are wary of Ballou's involvement in their departments, budgets, and curriculums. Dunn has been quick to assuage their concerns. "The last thing the faculty needs is to have someone telling them what to do, no matter how good the intentions of that person," he said. "I'm in the process of educating myself about the state of affairs and what the faculty wants." Both Dunn and Kanarek will be responsible for faculty hiring in their respective schools - decisions that will be closely scrutinized by professors and students calling for a greater degree of diversity among Tufts' faculty. They will also decide how to distribute new hires among different departments. In terms of the approach he will take to performing these duties, Dunn said he is in the "gathering phase." While Dunn will not deal directly with issues pertaining to the curriculum, as that will be the responsibility of Dean of the Colleges Charles Inouye, he did note that hiring decisions influence the content and nature of the curriculum. Kanarek will handle similar faculty issues for the graduate school. In a letter to the faculty, Ernst said that Kanarek's duties include "major oversight of research and scholarship in Arts and Sciences as well as responsibility for graduate programs and students in Arts and Sciences." In addition to promoting and coordinating graduate student research, Kanarek said that working to expand and broaden possibilities for undergraduate research is a priority. She will try to establish more integration among deans and better communication across departments, schools, and students. Ernst called Kanarek - the Tufts Community Union Senate's 2000 Professor of the Year - an "outstanding teacher and mentor of graduate and undergraduate students, an excellent scholar, and an experienced administrator." She also cited Kanarek's leadership as instrumental in brining plans for the new, albeit still nameless, psychology building to fruition. Dunn, Ernst said, is "ideally suited for this important position," and added that the former English professor is "an excellent scholar and a talented and popular teacher who attracts undergraduate and graduate students to his wide range of courses, from introductory classes to small seminars." Dunn gained administrative experience during his tenure as on-site Director of Tufts' summer program in Juneau, AS. Dunn said that while attention is often disproportionately devoted to the undergraduate side of the University, "Tufts has a lot of great graduate programs and it's important for people to know that." He cited the importance of "increasing interface between [undergraduate and graduate education] and making undergraduates aware of the role of graduate students." Though Dunn's duties, formerly covered by two deans, may seem overwhelming for one person, he stressed that he will cooperate extensively with Ernst and does not see the breadth of his duties as a problem. Kanarek takes over an existing position, but speculated, "I think the [role of Dean of the Graduate School for Arts and Sciences] is going to change because there is a new administration overall, with a new president." Both deans will work under Ernst. Their appointments are subject to Trustee approval, but both have begun work in their administrative capacities. Dunn, a former English professor, and Kanarek, a former psychology professor and chair of the department, were promoted as part of a larger administrative restructuring. Kanarek took over the position formerly held by Rob Hollister, now Dean of the University College on Citizenship and Public Service. Dunn now fills a role previously occupied by the Dean of Natural and Social Sciences, Ernst's former title, and the Dean of Arts and Humanities, history professor Leila Fawaz. Under the old administrative structure Ernst and Fawaz reported to Bernstein.William Kinlaw contributed to this article.


The Setonian
News

Police investigate e-mail in 'Source' investigation

In an ongoing investigation into the mass thefts of at least three print runs of The Primary Source, the Tufts University Police Department (TUPD) is examining an e-mail message that was forwarded to the conservative campus publication last month. The Jan. 31 issue of the Source - which cited e-mail excerpts allegedly written by former Pan-African Alliance (PAA) President Carl Jackson - accused the PAA of stealing "at least one print run" of the magazine last semester. Abdul Farah, current PAA president, has denied accusations that his organization was involved in the thefts, and any knowledge of the e-mail.TUPD Lieutenant Detective Charles Lonero said yesterday that police "have a name," but declined to release the identities of any students associated with the e-mail. "Information technology people are looking at the validity of the message," he said, adding that police "have some information that would indicate that one person might have been involved."Last night, the Daily obtained an e-mail message that Source Editor-in-chief Sam Dangremond confirmed as a copy of the same message that was forwarded to his publication, and subsequently provided to the TUPD. The message, sent to an alumni listproc, encourages recipients to complain to University administrators about the content of the Source."Our community has only recently opened its eyes to the kind of racism circulated by The Primary Source," the message says. "Thus far we have written counter articles and engaged in magazine dumpings." The e-mail went on to encourage readers to contact PAA officials, including Farah and Jackson, over winter break.Jackson, who is currently studying abroad, has not replied to e-mailed requests for comment earlier this week. Graduate Assistant in the Africana Center Lisa Karanja, who is listed as the sender of the e-mail, was also unavailable for contact last night.Dangremond maintains that message is evidence of the PAA's guilt, and has said that he will not press charges if the PAA "apologizes" for its alleged actions.


The Setonian
News

Loss to Jeffs in first round ends up and down season

The men's lacrosse team saw its season come to a close in somewhat disappointing fashion when it fell 10-7 to the Amherst Lord Jeffs on April 30 in the first round of the NESCAC playoffs. The Jumbos, who were seeded fifth in the tournament, lost to Amherst for the second time this season, and finished the year at 8-6 overall, 5-4 in the NESCAC. The Jeffs then visited defending national champion Middlebury in the second round, where they lost 16-5, finishing the season at 9-7 (5-4). Middlebury went on to win the NESCAC championship. "It was definitely disappointing," senior co-captain David Supple said. "We would've liked to win that one. We weren't satisfied ending in the first round." The loss put an end to a season full of ups and downs for the Jumbos, who lost in the first round of the NESCAC tournament for the second year in a row. "It was pretty tough, because I think we felt we were better than Amherst," freshman Bryan Griffin said. "We tried to do things we did all season to win, but it didn't work out." The team began the year with high expectations, despite the loss of all-time leading scorer Dan Kollar to graduation. These expectations were met early on in the season, as the Jumbos raced out to a 5-1 start, including a 2-0 mark in the NESCAC. One of those early NESCAC victories was a 10-8 win over Bowdoin, then ranked 15th in the nation. It was the first time the Jumbos had defeated the Polar Bears since 1994, and the team's confidence was high following the upset, as it was tied for first place in the NESCAC. Tufts saw a good opportunity to jump to 3-0 on the season the following weekend, as it squared off against a Williams team it had defeated the previous season. As the game entered the closing minutes, it appeared as if things were headed in the Jumbos favor. The team completed a comeback from four goals down to knot the game at ten with under a minute left to play. As the clock wound down, however, Williams senior Scott Goldberg beat senior goalkeeper Kirk Lutwyler to give the Ephs the victory as time expired. After suffering a solid 17-6 thumping at the hands of Middlebury the next week, the Jumbos found themselves at 2-2. They were in serious danger of falling below .500 in NESCAC play for the first time, with a game against the undefeated Colby White Mules looming in the near future. The Jumbos proved the were up to the challenge, however, and handed Colby, then ranked 20th in the nation, its first NESCAC loss of the season, 7-5. A pattern that started in the beginning of the season proved to be a theme for the Jumbos, as the squad continually stepped up and came through in big games, but struggled in somewhat less important contests against weaker competition. Tufts followed the Colby win with a 13-7 loss to Amherst, and a crushing 12-11 overtime defeat at the hands of Bates. Despite leading Bates 11-6 with just 5:40 left in regulation, the Bobcats rattled off five unanswered goals to tie the game at eleven. Bates scored the game winner just 18 second into the first overtime. "The wins (against Bowdoin and Colby) were huge," Supple said. "The Bates game I look at as bizarre, and the Williams game we weren't ready to win and we didn't play like we should have won. It just shows that we had things to improve on." After the two losses, the team that had looked like a lock for the playoffs and possibly even home field advantage was now in danger of missing the post season all together. The Jumbos rallied, however, and scored wins in their last two games of the season against Connecticut College and Wesleyan to secure the fifth seed in the playoffs. "Anyone can beat anyone on any given day because the division is so close. If you don't show up, or if one team has a great day, anything can happen," Griffin said. "I don't think we lived up to our goals as a team this season. Maybe we did somewhat by making the playoffs, but we wanted to win the NESCAC championship and prove how good we were." Despite not realizing all of its goals, there were many bright spots for the team this year, perhaps the brightest of which was Griffin. After not starting the first few games of the season, the freshman went on to be an every game starter. He led the team in scoring with 44 points in the form of 30 goals and 14 assists, filling a void left by Kollar's departure. This impressive first year campaign culminated in NESCAC rookie of the year honors for Griffin, the only Tufts representative in the All-NESCAC selections. "I'm honestly really thrilled. I thought I had a chance, but I had kind of a tough stretch in the middle of the season. I thought the close games at the end of the season might have hurt my chances," Griffin said. "To tell the truth I was just hoping to start at the beginning of the season." Coach Mike Daly is often asked if he is surprised by Griffin's performance. Based on Griffin's high school record, Daly said he knew Griffin would be a solid player. "Once he got here and I saw the amount of work and extra work he did, I'm not surprised at all," Daly said. "He was always down here working with coaches, watching films, in the cage by himself, and it's the players who work the hardest who end up being the best." Griffin will be an important element of a team next year that will have a much different look to it after the loss of many key players to graduation. The team will be without midfielders Supple and Jack Palmer, attackmen Jon Zissi, co-captain Jim Mandler, and Chris Taylor, as well as Lutwyler in goal. Supple, Palmer, Taylor, Mandler and Zissi accounted for five of the team's top eight scorers, and the offensive production will certainly be missed. Even more important than the numbers, however, will be the leadership and the legacy the seniors left behind. After winning only 15 games from 1995-1998, the seniors led to the team to more than double that amount in their fours years. "The reality is that you can never replace the guys that are leaving," Daly said. "The program owes a great debt to those guys. They really made the program one of the top in New England." Lutwyler may prove to be the most important loss however, as the senior has proven to be one of the top goalies in the NESCAC in his four years as a starter, compiling a 10.03 goals against average, 58.6 save percentage, and 790 saves in an astounding 3343 minutes of playing time. Despite the vacuous hole left in net with Lutwyler's departure, the team boasts a number of solid candidates to take over the job. As a strong potential prospect to fill Lutwyler's shoes, sophomore goalie Brian Atherton said that the position is really up for grabs. "The team is in a new position because Kirk was a four year starter, and the goalie before him was a four year starter. Going into next season, we'll have at least three goalies competing to start," he said. "While I feel that any of us would do fine, how we react to the pressure of playing a tough schedule will determine not only who leads the team, but also our success as a team." Despite falling short of their goals, the Jumbos are pleased with their effort this season and are optimistic for next year. "I thought we had a pretty good season and it was just a great time," Supple said. "Everybody wanted to win and it was great to be on a team like that. For the most part we all did everything we could to win games." Although the team is losing many players, Tufts' defense remains intact, and the team possesses a number of younger players who did not see much of the field this year, and have yet to step up. "We're all good players, and I think the team will miss us, but we're replaceable," Supple said. "There are guys who didn't get a lot of playing time this year and will see a lot more next year. If I was coming back I would definitely be excited about this team."


The Setonian
News

XXX

This week's other release, John Q, is by far the weaker movie of the two. It is no more than a mawkish, obvious, poorly made howler of a hostage movie. The phrases "subtle Bruce Willis movie" and "poorly made Denzel Washington film" were not meant to exist in the English language, and yet here they are. Crazier things have happened, and if you don't believe me, take a look at last month's Kung Pow: Enter the Fist (which might be the strangest film ever made).John Q has everything backwards. The concept and commercials grab the imagination easily: working man has a son, son needs help, HMOs won't pay, man resorts to desperate measures, how will it end? These ideas appeal to something in all of us, and I really wanted to like this movie. I walked away in utter disgust. There is nothing more manipulative than a dying kid in a movie. When you put something like that on the table, you have to be able to back it up with facts, detail and self-restraint to make it work. The movie must be about more than its issue or disease. Philadelphia knew this, and so did Forrest Gump and What's Eating Gilbert Grape. Even The Insider, which I was not a big fan of, knew that it was the people - not the issues alone - that made the subject matter interesting. The problem is this: John Q never rises above the simplicity of its advertising. If you've seen the trailer, you've seen all the build up there is - John Q has a great family, John has troubles making ends meet, John's kid gets sick, John has a montage of hitting a wall of red tape, John decides to take over the hospital. The disease and circumstances are plot devices and little more. The hospital officials are so instantly evil and uncaring that John's attempts to work out a financial arrangement are doomed from the start. Every aspect of his character's financial situation is simplified to the generic; every moment is shortened so we can get to the good hostage stuff sooner. There are real people who get lost in the cracks of our health care system everyday, but this film considers its audience too stupid to understand the complex reasons why. Let me be clear: It would be one thing if the film had the officials explaining in the piles of jargon why he could not receive coverage, and that he would be left confused and bewildered. It is believable that most of us would get lost in the lawyer-speak and do anything to save our children. But all we get as the audience is "No, we can't save your son. We don't care. Bye now, you filthy poor person." John simply gets screwed by everyone and goes postal. There is a great movie that will be made about the need for health care in this country. This movie is not that movie. It wants desperately to be everything to everybody: an epic statement movie, hostage movie, family drama, thriller, The Negotiator-rip off and media satire all at once. It fails on every level imaginable, except in the quiet scenes between Washington and his son. Good actors sink around him while he flounders about, trying to make the movie work. He earns his paycheck at the end of the day, and if we care at all about John it is due only to the heavy lifting he does onscreen. Everyone else should be ashamed of themselves. There are good actors in this movie, or at least actors who have risen to the occasion in the past: James Woods, Anne Heche, Robert Duvall, Ray Liotta, comedian Eddie Griffith, Ethan Suplee (Blow and Evolution) all turn in stock, forgettable performances. While the lines and characters they were given were admittedly awful, they could have at least looked like they gave a damn. Woods and Liotta, in particular, should have gotten slapped around by the director before they nodded off. Then again, director Nick Cassavetes should have gotten slapped once or twice himself. So should the writers. In fact, everyone deserves a big fat slapping for this movie except for Washington himself. There are awkward moments where the blood and reality of ER meets the golly-gee-shucks humor of Friends. The side characters are shallow and straight out bad sitcoms and dart board screenwriting ("Okay, let's have a -thunk-pregnant woman, and a-thunk-fat security guard, and, hmm, we need a token black guy and...") The ending is particularly painful, as it wants to be mega-happy and sadly epic at the same time. Does the kid live? Do we get a trial scene? Is there a montage of real life activists calling for healthcare reform? Hello? The draw of this film was that a father would be driven to break the law in order to save his son, and damn the consequences. The film ends with a stunned John Q, unable to comprehend that he might go to jail for what he has done. And most of the hostages are right there with him, standing by their captor. There is not a moment of the hostage stuff in John Q that isn't artificial, stagy, contrived or just plain wrong. You want to stand up and scream, No, no no, this is all wrong, this should be better, you can do better. Only Washington's efforts make the film worth watching at all, whereas Willis is the only thing that distracts you from the story and acting of Hart's War. Who knows what will happen next? Probably not John Q 2, or for that matter Hart's War 2. But hey, if you had told me a year ago that a sequel to a Chris Tucker/Jackie Chan movie would make over 200 million dollars, I'd said you were crazy. If you had also said that a Bruce Willis war movie would be better than a Denzel Washington drama coming out the same day, I'd have said you were really crazy. Crazy, it seems, is the way to go. Kung Pow 2, here we come.


The Setonian
News

Child Development professor takes to the small screen

Known for passionate and enthusiastic lectures in her child development classes, Dr. Maryanne Wolf appeared on PBS last Tuesday to share her expertise with a wider audience. In addition to teaching classes, Wolf is the director of Tufts' Center for Reading and Language Research. Aired on Jan. 22, The Child's Brain: Syllable from Sound, was the second episode of the PBS series The Secret Life of the Brain. The five-part series, slated to air over a three-week period, deals with "all aspects of the brain," according to Wolf. The show explores the complicated processes of brain development over a person's lifetime. The show, according to PBS, addresses the topic through "dynamic visual imagery and compelling human stories to help a general audience understand otherwise difficult scientific concepts." PBS approached Wolf about the special, which was originally filmed last year, to seek her expertise in the field of literacy development. The goal of this "cinematic endeavor," as Wolf puts it, is two fold: first "to understand what areas of the brain were being used in reading," and second, "what people at Tufts are doing to translate the knowledge of the reading brain into a better way to teach children." "[The episode] takes you through the developing fetus, all the way through to my segment, reading," Wolf said. The film is significant for the University, as it spotlights the Tufts Center for Reading and Language Research. "[This is] the first time we've had two PBS films of the Center's work and an emphasis on translating cognitive science to teaching," Wolf said. Located in the basement of Miller Hall, the Center is part of a three-city program with Toronto's Hospital for Sick Children and Georgia State University in Atlanta. It concentrates on learning more about how the brain functions in order to help children with severe reading disabilities."The center not only conducts cutting-edge research, but its various offshoots offer programs in community service to nearby schools," Marjorie Howard wrote in the Tufts Journal, published on Sept. 20, 2001. The center focuses on other research besides helping children with reading disabilities and setbacks, according to Howard. "[The Center] has something to offer every level of the University. Undergraduates and graduate students receive training; doctoral students and faculty have access to ever-increasing databases; and the University is contributing to its neighboring communities," Howard wrote. The center is also reaching out to the community. "The center has entered into a collaboration with the mayor of Malden to work with teachers and children in that city," Howard wrote. This collaboration, know as the Tufts Malden Project implements new instructional methods, developed based on cognitive science, of teaching students with severe reading disorders. Howard credits Wolf's knowledge and studies, to contributing to the child development field. "Maryanne Wolf has spent years understanding how we learn to read and what happens when that process breaks down. Her scholarship has resulted in new developments in treating dyslexia and has added to the body of knowledge in the neurosciences," Howard wrote. Wolf's academic endeavors led her to the writing of a book on the subject, Plato's Rebellion: The Story and Science of Reading and Its Disorders. The preface of the upcoming book states: "Written language represents one of the most extraordinarily complex and least understood acts the species has ever been called upon to learn." It is this complex act that Wolf tackles and attempts to explain in layman's terms in her new book, expected to be published by the end 2002. Wolf's experiences with and research leading up to the making of the PBS special and the writing of her book will most likely find their way into the classroom, either through discussion in CD-1 or CD-243, class which Wolf teaches in spring and fall respectively. In addition to possibly becoming a part of her curriculum, Wolf wishes to show the films at the Center's open house, scheduled for later on in the semester.


The Setonian
News

Ren represents Tufts, Hong Kong in Salt Lake

The list of successful Jumbo athletes through the years is not unimpressive, but nonetheless athletics is not the first thing that comes to mind when thinking of Tufts. Therefore, freshman Christy Ren - who represented Hong Kong in the Salt Lake City Olympics - is somewhat of a Brown and Blue marvel.


The Setonian
News

Starting out just friends

There are several different ways to define love. There's the unconditional love you feel for family members, and the romantic love you experience after carefully developing a relationship with a significant other. Then there's the type of love that is based purely on trust and friendship - a love that often burns stronger and lasts far longer than all others. But what happens when the lines between these various forms of the sacred L-word are blurred? Pen, Paint, and Pretzel's (3Ps) production of Stop Kiss, which opens tonight in the Balch Arena Theater, attempts to answer this question by taking a look at the intertwining lives of two young women living in the bustling world of New York City. The play was written just last year by Diana Son. Junior Rah-nee Kelly, armed with previous directing experience from last year's Picasso at the Lapine Agile and The Vagina Monologues, chose the piece based on its modernity and accessibility. Kelly stumbled upon the play by accident while scouring scripts and considering options for a 3Ps direction project. She liked its unique blend of tongue-and-cheek humor and sophistication. "It's about contact, friendship, and confrontation with what you don't want to deal with but are forced to," Kelly said, citing that the material is challenging not just for her but also for the actors and the audience. Structurally similar to last semester's How I Learned to Drive, Stop Kiss explores the relationship between Callie (senor Rachel Evans) and Sarah (senior Rachel Jablin) by sharing episodic slices-of-life that piece together the greater story at hand. Both women are single and heterosexual, with Callie maintaining a friends-with-benefits relationship with George (freshman Kevin Miller) while Sarah attempts to escape the clutches of her possessive ex-boyfriend Peter (sophomore Sam Rivers). Callie is a traffic reporter for a local news station who wishes she had more of a passion for her job and life in general. Discontent deepens upon meeting Sarah, a teacher from St. Louis who has a knack for working with children. Callie admires Sarah's dedication and pure love for teaching, and they quickly develop a close friendship. But their relationship seems to reach an emotional attachment that goes beyond what society feels is normal for two women, to the point where both feel somewhat tempted to take it further. They do, and the homophobic gay-bashing that follows tarnishes both of their lives, leaving Sarah in a coma and Callie to pick up the pieces. She is aided in her struggles by Detective Cole (sophomore Taylor Shann), who brings the story together through questions and answers; a stodgy witness named Mrs. Winsley; and a nurse who assumes that the pair are in fact lovers (both played by sophomore Megan Hammer). "Half the play is the past, half is the future," explained Shann. "It's all about getting to the moment that's between them." Shann and Hammer's characters accent the plot as outsiders, helping Callie to realize how to best define her relationship with Sarah. "After the whole assault [Callie] has to learn how to deal with things on her own and still be strong," Evans said. All of the characters are realistic, because the actors have been able to borrow from people they know to create their personas. "[George] is basically a happy-go-lucky bastard," he said. "I read the script and I think 'I know this! I know who said that.'" But Kelly cautioned that the play's essential premise is not one of lesbianism; and that anyone who wants to see the play solely to see two women getting it on should stay home (the furthest Callie and Sarah get is a peck on the lips). "Don't come expecting to see a lesbian play," she said. "It's more about whether two woman can or should be more than friends...how do we look at it?"Stop Kiss is appropriately co-sponsored by the Women's Center, further emphasizing the delicate themes the show raises with regard to self-identity and sexuality. Such concepts, says Kelly, are "not hard to get but you need to pay attention." "These are conversations we've all experienced," she said. "If anyone who goes to Tufts has ever had a moment they wished they lived over, this play deals with the repercussions...they're not perfect, but we see that it's okay." 'Stop Kiss' opens tonight and runs through Saturday in the Balch Arena Theater. Tickets are $5 with a Tufts ID.


The Setonian
News

On the complicated road to job security

Imagine a guarantee of straight As between now and the time you graduate. Given this, would you still go to class? For some critics of tenure, that situation is analogous to the process which provides professors with the academic freedom to teach and research whatever they want without worrying about job security. Some lament its potential for promoting laziness - one that Tufts provost Sol Gittleman wrote has "given many academics protection to be despicable human beings and miserable colleagues." The tenure distinction is shared by approximately 75 percent of Tufts faculty members. The "tenure clock" starts ticking when a professor is offered tenure by the administration, and a review occurs after six years. In the meantime, the professor is expected to demonstrate his or her commitment to teaching, scholarship, and to the University through service in their departments. It's a process that Child Development professor Chip Gidney finished last spring, and one he said provides job security "almost unheard of in 21st century America." "It is one of the most wonderful aspects of university life, frankly, and is the reason that so many of us work so hard to get tenure," Gidney said. It's also an aspect that has long been the subject of criticism for its lengthy process and its effect on motivation. Gidney said that while people want time to put together their tenure packets, he sympathizes with criticisms about length. "I think that many professors would argue that drawing out this excruciating process, and trust me, it is psychologically excruciating, would constitute cruel and unusual punishment," he said. The process sometimes causes universities to lose faculty members. Paul Lopes of the sociology department was denied tenure recently and is subsequently leaving Tufts. "Tenure is a grueling process for all junior faculty," Lopes said. The biggest critics of tenure, though, argue that it saps professors' motivation. Gittleman has stopped short of calling for its abolition but said in a Daily Viewpoint last month that its abuses have caused him to "at least think it over." Still, the provost said eliminating tenure would eventually cause equally unfortunate problems. "[Tenure] is still here, if we got rid of it abuses would start on the other side and in 50 years we'd have it back," Gittleman said. Not surprisingly, tenured professors are staunch defendants of the practice. Sheila Emerson, an tenured member of the English department, said that job security does lead to a change in attitude, but not in motivation. "I wouldn't say I work any less hard, probably harder," she said. "The emotion is different, the anxiety isn't there... that has to be a much happier experience than not having a job and going from year to year," she said. Both Emerson and Gidney say the freedom that tenure offers is actually beneficial in the classroom. "What tenure does is that it allows a professor complete intellectual freedom," Gidney said. "She can study what she wants, make controversial claims if she wants, without fear of reprisal from the administration. It also means that a professor can devote more time to his classes, if he wants." At Tufts, tenure procedures have not vastly changed over the last two decades. It's a process that's not very different from other schools, in practice and in number of professors tenured. Gittleman said that some schools keep the number of tenured faculty at 50 percent, while offering "unofficial tenure" to professors until other tenured professors leave. Without a mandated retirement age, tenured professors can continue at Tufts for a considerably long time. Gittleman said how long a professor can remain energetic is an important concern. Another concern is the ubiquitous balance between scholarship and teaching that is only exacerbated with tenure. Most liberal arts universities, Tufts included, say that tenured professors should strike a balance between the two. It's a standard that Lopes said "doesn't necessarily work out that way." Gidney acknowledged the dichotomy. "There is certainly a tension between research and teaching... This tension exists for all university professors but I think that at places like Tufts, the administration takes good teaching seriously" he said. "I don't think that one can be a horrible teacher here and still get tenure." Gittleman agreed, saying that the University looks for the best possible teacher and best possible researcher. How are those judgment calls made? Critics say the process is entirely subjective, in that professors' work is scrutinized and irrevocably judged by members in other departments as well as the professor's own. "Disciplinary politics can play a role in individual cases," Lopes said. Often tenure can depend on how people view scholarship, he added. Gittleman says that professors have their own biases toward their subject and even toward how another professor conducts his or her research. He said that people involved in the process try to make "the best guess possible" on who will also continue to be productive. Gidney feels that despite departmental politics within the University, the process is thorough enough that it does not play a significant role. "Of course politics play a role in the tenure decision, it would be naive to suggest that they don't," he said. "However, because the process is such a rigorous process and because there are so many outside reviewers who are not embroiled in departmental or university politics, I'm confident that politics don't play the major role in tenure decisions." But Gidney maintains that the tenure process is not entirely objective. "Is it a subjective decision? Absolutely - people who don't know you, judge your work, your productivity, your teaching - that's always a subjective decision. I cannot imagine how it could be otherwise," he said. All these prblems help perpetuate a high education discussion on its eventual elimination. That option is obviously unpopular among faculty members, and administrators such as Gittleman have acknowledged that the solution is likely not abolition. And Dean Susan Ernst said that tenure at Tufts should be here to stay. "I personally believe strongly in tenure, sure maybe there are a few people who abuse the privilege of tenure, but I still believe in it," she said. Gidney said tenure at Tufts does warrant too much scrutiny. "Some university systems have discussed abandoning the tenure system and making university teaching more like other jobs that have annual reviews," he said. "Personally, I think this is not necessary at Tufts because, from what I can tell, all of my tenured colleagues continue to be productive and continue to work hard." Lopes believes that tenure is important but certain practices should be reevaluated. There is a lack of openness in the process, he said, that could be bettered, as well finding a middle ground in disciplinary politics. Ernst said the potential for eventual tenure is considered as early as when a professor is first hired. "When we hire people we ask, is this someone who will flourish here and be recognized as an expert in their field? We hire people who we think will get tenure at Tufts," she said.


The Setonian
News

Hits and Misses

Andrew W.K.I Get WetDef Jam3/5 "Saving rock 'n roll" is, admittedly, the job of the music press. Without a savior a month, there'd be nothing to write about. Right now it seems that Andrew W.K. is filling those shoes - the question is, can he?I Get Wet is a resounding "yes," something completely unexpected in the current music maelstrom of realness vs. fakeness. On his Def Jam debut, the Detroit Rock City native gives us a throwback to the days of yore, to the roots of metal and glam-rock. There are shouted, sometimes ridiculously trite lyrics (and titles like "She is beautiful," "I Love NYC"), abrasive guitars, and solid drumbeats. While the album often pushes the pop-punk border, its message is always the same: "Party Hard!" That song, the album's single, sums up W.K.: pleasurably poppy and intertwined melodies, head-banging rhythm, sing-along lyrics. It's an invitation for the listener to abandon his/her inhibitions and stresses, with W.K. leading the way. The only danger W.K. faces is getting caught up in his own party: after a few songs, the novelty wears off. - Rob BellingerKylie MinogueFeverCapitol Records2.5/5 Dance that's sultry, sexy, and cheap. All the right ingredients do not make for brilliant music. Considered scientifically, Kylie Minogue should be embarrassingly successful: she's got a good voice, catchy (and danceable) beats, sexy lyrics, and a hot body. The cross-pollination between pop and techno should even ensure her a broad audience, as remixes of her songs abound. But examined artistically, the whole mess stinks. Minogue may get all the success that her formula should demand, but this is cheesy dance-pop at its cheesiest. It's got the sex, it's got the beats, it's got a hot singer unashamed to show off her body; what it doesn't have is any integrity or soul. Of course, one-night stands don't require either one. Fever


The Tufts Daily Crossword with an image of a crossword puzzle
The Print Edition
Tufts Daily front page