Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Arts

The Setonian
Arts

EPIIC committee explores 'Global Cities' through pre-symposium film series

The annual symposium orchestrated by the year-long Education for Public Inquiry and International Citizenship (EPIIC) class is only about two weeks away, beginning on Feb. 19. To promote the event on campus, members of EPIIC have divided into committees, each with its own strategy for spreading the word. One of these committees is sponsoring a film series that shows movies relating to the theme of their EPIIC class, "Global Cities." Last Thursday, members of the committee screened "Wall-E" (2008) in Braker Hall. Sophomore Meera Pandit, a member of the committee, explained how "Wall-E" related to the theme of "Global Cities."


The Setonian
Arts

A.C. Newman 'guilty' of producing a monotonous new album

    As the founder of indie-pop super-group The New Pornographers, Canadian songwriter A.C. Newman was crowned as hipster royalty long ago. Newman gained a reputation as the sunny, upbeat counterpoint to the often-dour indie scene of the early 2000s. On the strength of the success of the first two New Pornographers albums, he released his first solo effort, "The Slow Wonder," in 2004. The disc, which didn't stray too far from the Pornographers' signature power pop style, sold modestly and earned critical acclaim.     Five years and two more Pornographers albums later, Newman has released his follow-up, "Get Guilty," and it seems like he's finally running out of ideas.     "Get Guilty" has a lot in common with Newman's previous work. Newman's reedy vocals are, as usual, supported by a shouting, harmonizing chorus of female voices (usually featuring Kori Gardner of Mates of State). The orchestration echoes of instruments from electric guitars to drums to pianos to violins pop in and out as needed. Ponderous beats power through every track, often monotonous and unchanging.     Unfortunately, where his melodies used to be joyous and energetic, they've calmed down to being borderline lethargic. Some songs sound so similar, they are nearly indistinguishable, making parts of the album blur into one long, beat-driven track. Newman's song structures have always been mildly repetitive; he tends to use a few musical phrases over and over between verses. Now those phrases overwhelm anything else a song has to offer.     Newman is wise to hold the bombastic opening track, "There Are Maybe Ten or Twelve…," to two-and-a-half minutes, and the rhythmic pattern of "Get Guilty" consumes "Elemental," which, with its quirky meter and few repeated phrases, comes off like a skipping record. In "Thunderbolts," atypical vocals are hampered by an endlessly recurring drum beat.     The album does have more successful moments, though, such as the subdued crescendo of "The Heartbreak Rides," which breaks up the repetitive chorus with a rollicking guitar hook. "The Palace at 4 A.M.," "Get Guilty's" most pop-influenced offering, ratchets up the tempo with a galloping beat. The rhythm of the album changes again with "Young Atlantis," which is more low-key and meditative than previous tracks.     As usual, Newman's work oscillates between off-kilter pop melodies and more cacophonic indie-rock efforts. "Like A Hitman Like A Dancer" and "The Changeling (Get Guilty)" fall under the former category, showcasing back-up vocals and instrumental solos. Rockers include "Submarines of Stockholm," which uses staccato piano and guitar chords to drive the limited melody, and "The Collected Works," which combines low piano chords and distorted guitar with a single violin to create a uniquely textured indie-rock sound.     "Get Guilty" closes with "All of My Days and All of My Days Off," the sing-along chorus of which hearkens back to Newman's earlier, happier work. Regrettably, though, not much substance is seen in this or any other song on the album. It's as if Newman skipped over the creative work that went into his earlier releases, relying on one idea to create an entire album.     Truthfully, "Get Guilty" is often monotonous and at times overwhelmingly boring. It's not outright bad but merely mediocre. It seems as though Newman has used up the kind of dynamic songwriting material that made "The Slow Wonder" such a pleasant surprise five years ago.     Newman's work has always been invigorated with an addictive rhythm and a certain unpredictability. That hasn't changed. He has an enviable ear for unconventional harmonies, melodic pivots and layered instrumentation. Indie fans especially fans of The New Pornographers' 2007 release, "Challengers" will still find something to like in "Get Guilty," but those familiar with Newman's oeuvre will know that he can do much better.


The Setonian
Arts

Zach Drucker and Chris Poldoian | Bad Samaritans

Like many of you out there, we spent this past Sunday evening with our buddies consuming obscene amounts of pizza and watching TV; more specifically, a series of 30-second snippets interrupted occasionally by a football game. While some of the commercials were great (Oh, Conan, at least the Swedes love you!), what really intrigued us was the abundance of mesmerizing movie trailers.     For us, movie trailers can be just as exciting as the movies themselves. By stylishly presenting a few key scenes, trailers give us a general idea of what to expect while leaving us thirsting for more.     In order for a trailer to successfully hook viewers, it must stray away from some hackneyed tendencies. Trailers often give away too much information. "Gran Torino" (2008)'s trailer not only revealed the movie's premise but force-fed plot-points down our throats. Whet our appetites, don't drown them.     In a trailer, less is more. "Cloverfield" (2008) seized our attention by turning a seemingly wild party into a scene of chaos and destruction without ever revealing the face of its monster or even the film's title.     Regarding comedies, advertising teams must be careful not to waste all of a movie's punch lines, because viewers can sense a dearth of comedic diversity. For example, one might chuckle at Kevin James' rotund nature in the trailer for "Paul Blart: Mall Cop" (2008). Yet, if fat jokes become boring after 30 seconds, how could an audience survive 90 minutes of James precariously riding a Segway?     Sound can also make or break a trailer. In trailers for "Pineapple Express" (2008), slow motion footage of James Franco breakdancing is synced to MIA's hip-hop ballad, "Paper Planes." The catchy tune and presence of cannabis-related humor baited viewers to see the film, only to find that "Paper Planes" was, ironically, MIA from the actual film.     "The Strangers" (2008) trailer made us cringe by excluding sound. No, you did not accidentally sit on the mute button. During one pivotal point in the trailer, a montage that included Liv Tyler screaming and crawling away from a masked pursuer omitted sound and left our pants wet from silent terror.     On Sunday, the trailers were mixed. The trailer for "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" (2009) succeeded in emphasizing action-filled scenes without disclosing too many plot details, almost making us forget all about the fact that Shia LaBeouf went on a drinking binge, totaled his car and made the writers adjust the script to incorporate his mangled hand.     Meanwhile, the "The Year One" (2009) trailer, while lacking in substance, accentuated its venerable cast, concentrating its time on actors Jack Black and Michael Cera, and even flashing a glimpse at "Superbad's" (2007) McLovin, Christopher Mintz-Plasse. This trailer also acted as a prelude to Black's steamy love scene with the raunchiest 82-year-old in Hollywood, Cloris Leachman, in the subsequent episode of "The Office."     "Up" (2009), on the other hand, was borderline boastful. The trailer actually recited Pixar's previous triumphs. For the last time, we already know you guys made "Finding Nemo" (2003).     So next time you go to the movies, make sure to get there early enough to catch the trailers. Who knows? Maybe you'll catch a glimpse of a goateed Will Ferrell battling giant computer-generated crabs in a preview for "Land of the Lost" (2009).


The Setonian
Arts

Action-packed 'Taken' takes few effective steps to entertain moviegoers

            "Taken" is the type of film that could only be made in America: There are fistfights, chase sequences and shootouts throughout — and naturally, an enormous body count. All of this is at the expense of believable characters, emotional depth and most importantly, an interesting plot. This makes it all the more curious that its director, Pierre Morel, is French.     Morel, whose directorial debut was the parkour-infused beat-'em-up "District B13" (2004), doesn't stray far from what he knows best. "Taken" has a lot less parkour but only marginally more intelligence.     The story follows a retired spy, Bryan Mills (played by Liam Neeson), whose daughter Kim (Maggie Grace) finds her European vacation cut short by a gang of kidnappers with an eye for human trafficking. Her father, who happens to be on the phone with her at the time of said kidnapping, vows to do anything in his power to find her, and he promises some very nasty retribution.     Kim's abduction, however, is little more than a plot device and its emotional impact is almost entirely glossed over. Yes, the mother and stepfather (Famke Janssen and Xander Berkeley) act as distraught as could be expected, but "Taken" doesn't play to emotion; it goes straight for the jugular. Accordingly, Bryan's reaction isn't one of helpless mourning as he takes the first flight to Paris and puts on his brass knuckles.     The film's early attempts at character-building not only suffer from contrived, bland writing, but one scene (in which Bryan tries his hand at concert security) is so absurd that it's unintentionally comic. The script deserves the majority of the blame, but Grace isn't doing herself any favors here. Her portrayal of the 17-year-old Kim isn't just distractingly bad; she plays the character far younger than she should, and Kim comes across frustratingly immature as a result.     Poor acting aside, the major flaw here doesn't lie with the story itself but with its execution. The plot has been designed to maximize the potential for action sequences in favor of creating authentic characters. At a slim 93 minutes, the film has to choose one or the other. The result is a fairly one-dimensional cast that awkwardly steps out of the way to let the action take over.     The problem is that once it does, it's not all that impressive. Sure, the gunfights are serviceable, and Bryan's one-punch knockouts are entertaining at first, but there is not a memorable scene to be had here. It could be said that one month from now, "Taken" won't even be worth a second thought because everything it does has been done before and done better. The "Bourne" series, which has a similarly kinetic style, has "Taken" outgunned in terms of storyline, believability, interesting characters and pure visceral fun. A significant underlying factor here is that "Taken" tries to force its basic storyline, which has plenty of dramatic potential, into the narrow mold of an action film.     Morel clearly understands how to shoot an action sequence; he doesn't understand drama. He never succeeds in making the audience empathize with his characters in large part because he doesn't try to. He's content with using stock characters because they allow him room for more chase scenes, more fistfights and more nameless henchmen to be offed.     It is a shame, really, because "Taken" could have been so much more. Its central idea, the story of an estranged father seeking redemption by finding his daughter, could have been the subject of a compelling drama. This could be best accomplished by taking away the car chases, the dead bodies and the breakneck pace and by slowing things down, allowing the man to show how he's feeling and giving Neeson a chance to act. Morel, however, never takes his finger off fast-forward, and the film is all the worse for it.


The Setonian
Arts

Four entertaining personalities unite in Showtime's new 'Tara'

    Only creative masterminds like Steven Spielberg and Diablo Cody could come up with Showtime's newest program, "United States of Tara." The show portrays a middle-class woman's struggle with dissociative identity disorder, which causes her to morph into different alter egos when she is stressed or upset. The odd premise actually works since Cody's writing lends a certain humor and tenderness to an extremely serious condition.     Tara Gregson (played by Toni Collette) has decided to go off her medication in order to live a more involved life with her husband and two children. The drawback is that her medication was the only thing suppressing her "alters:" T, Buck and Alice.     Tara's supportive husband Max (John Corbett) does his best to hold together his family when Tara's alters wreak havoc. He must fend off the sexual advances of T, a fun 15-year-old girl who, in the pilot, comes out when Tara discovers that her daughter Kate (Brie Larson) has a prescription for morning-after pills. He also must protect his gay son Marshall (Keir Gilchrist) from the homophobic Buck, Tara's male alterego. When Tara sees Kate being physically abused by her boyfriend, Buck comes out and starts a fistfight in front of the entire school.     The series follows Tara's struggle to control and understand her alter egos while dealing with the everyday stresses of being a working wife and mother.     In the hands of a lesser actress, Tara Gregson and her three alter egos could seem silly, making "United States of Tara" just another bizarre television show without any internal drama. Collette, however, has perfected the role of an emotionally fragile mother in movies like "The Sixth Sense" (1999) and "Little Miss Sunshine" (2006).     Here, not only is she playing her choice role, but she also gets to have fun with the alters, and her acting is never unbelievable or over-the-top. Collette easily changes from Tara to T to Buck with nothing more than a deep breath; she changes her facial expressions, her voice, her walk and her mannerisms to give life to each character separately.     The show's supporting cast holds its own next to Collette, especially Gilchrist as Tara's son. Gilchrist takes on one of the more difficult roles in the show since he is playing an adolescent boy embracing his homosexuality. Larson as the hormonal teenage daughter is funny to watch, and she can carry an emotional scene, while Corbett falls into the nice-guy role he played in "Sex and the City" quite easily.     Rosemarie DeWitt, who received critical acclaim after starring in "Rachel Getting Married" (2008) with Anne Hathaway, makes an appearance as Charmaine, Tara's skeptical sister. She is clearly the voice for skeptics who do not believe Tara's disease is real, but Cody portrays her as whiny and selfish, clearly establishing her views on nonbelievers.     Cody's writing shines and can be considered the other star of the show. The woman can make an audience laugh and cry, all the while creating a modern vocabulary to suck in younger viewers. Sometimes, however, Cody's writing can seem too cool, forcing the viewer to question if the world Cody lives in really exists for the rest of us.     She deals with a lot of dark, intense issues in just the pilot episode of "United States of Tara": abuse, mental disease, teenage sex and birth control and adolescent homosexuality. Cody seems to live in a world where family members take all of these problems in stride with only minor arguments and tantrums. If the audience somehow doesn't get the family love message, Marshall's line, "We're lucky, Mom. Because of you, we get to be interesting," hammers it home.     Cody does create many tender moments, such as a family bowling outing during which Buck teaches Marshall how to bowl and then wrestles him into a headlock. She also manages to make the audience laugh with T's sexual antics with Max, Buck's distaste for Marshall's baking, and Marshall tagging in for Buck to beat up Kate's abusive boyfriend.     The show combines all the right elements; the fresh concept of "United States of Tara" is intriguing, and the cast members create a group of simultaneously moving and entertaining characters.


The Setonian
Arts

RIAA to stop suing for illegal downloading

After coming under widespread criticism over its legal tactics, the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) announced in December that it will no longer sue individuals accused of sharing music illegally. Since then, it has focused its efforts on working directly with Internet service providers (ISPs) to stop downloading, but is continuing to pursue a legal case against a local graduate student.



The Setonian
Arts

Brandeis to close Rose Art Museum

Brandeis University announced last week that it would close its Rose Art Museum and sell its entire collection in response to the school's deepening financial problems. The liquidation of the collection, which is worth about $350 million, has caused a great deal of controversy and sent shockwaves throughout the art world and the Brandeis community.


The Setonian
Arts

DiCaprio, Winslet pave 'Road' to multiple Oscars

The director of "American Beauty" (1999) has once again successfully crafted a movie about disillusioned suburbia. "Revolutionary Road" never falls into its predecessor's shadow, and its disintegrating couple, the reunited Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet, perform their roles with stunning artistry.


The Setonian
Arts

Bird's latest is a 'Noble' effort

There are many sides to Andrew Bird, the musician behind "Noble Beast." He is a classically trained violinist who studied at Northwestern University's prestigious conservatory, a singer with an enchantingly smooth voice, a very good whistler and a normal guy from Chicago who loves music.


The Setonian
Arts

Top Ten | Dances that should be revived at the next Winter Bash

    After witnessing what passed for dancing at Winter Bash, the Daily Arts Department got nostalgic for the good old days. There was a time when getting down on the dance floor didn't mean having sex with your clothes on, when rhythmic expression wasn't limited to grinding up on someone's naughty bits, and when one could go to a dance and not be subjected to soft-to-hard-core porn all night. Here are the Top 10 dances we'd rather see at next year's Winter Bash: 10. Chicken Dance: Even if you don't want to be a chicken, don't like chickens, or have a rare poultry allergy, you probably still want to shake your butt if you're at Winter Bash or anywhere else you may be expected to "bring it on." And what better dance than the Chicken Dance? Even Marty "Nobody calls me chicken!" McFly loves the Chicken Dance. 9. Soulja Boy: While this is the most recent dance on our list, the crazy sensation that swept the hip-hop world last year has easily and sadly been forgotten. Besides, it's always funny watching middle-class white kids trying to dance hip-hop moves. 8. Middle-school Slow Dance (a.k.a. "The Frankenstein"): Drunkenness can lead to uncomfortable encroachments on personal space. It may be time to remember that we always need to leave room for the Holy Spirit. As it turns out, the Holy Spirit has put on some weight recently, which would require both you and your partner to hyper-extend your arms in front of you and lock your elbows in a Frankenstein-esque manner. 7. Thriller: First popularized in 1983 by the eponymous song and subsequent short-film music video, this dance is best known for Michael Jackson's groundbreaking "swinging-raptor-arms" move. No one can ever really remember the rest of the dance, so this move usually suffices for both tearing it up on the dance floor and fending off potential muggers on the walk home afterward. 6. Cotton-Eyed Joe: Who doesn't love this middle-school throwback? We all know the tune and secretly love the chance it gives us to show off our inner-cowboys. And, who knows? If this dance gets brought back, we may finally be able to answer the immortal words: "Where did you come from? Where did you go? Where did you come from, Cotton-Eyed Joe?" 5. The Can-Can: Yes, we can-can. 4. Macarena: The Macarena, Latin sensation and Bar Mitzvah staple that it is, makes anyone look like an expert dancer. If you've got the hand thing, the little waggle and the turn down, you're a dance machine. 3. Electric Slide: A dance that is composed of so many slides and shuffles, someone might think you are slipping all over the floor. The problem with this dance is many people may confuse it with the Cha-Cha Slide, which is completely different and much less classy. Oh, and ... IT'S ELECTRIC! 2. The Hora (a.k.a. "That Hava Nagilah Dance"): Judaism long ago accepted the fact that most of its followers can't dance, which is why this quintessentially Jewish celebratory dance consists merely of holding hands and running in circles. To top it off, you get to lift people up in chairs with the intent of either scaring the bejesus out of them or breaking the ceiling. Or both. 1. Riverdance: What do you get when you mix a huge stage, all of your Irish relatives, and a butt-load of Guiness? You guessed it. Just try not to kick anyone in the face when you get in that huge line, no one wants a drunken brawl at Winter Bash ... right? —compiled by the Daily Arts Department


The Setonian
Arts

Soderbergh's 'Guerilla' brings Guevara to life

    "Che: Part Two — Guerrilla" (2008) is both the second half of Steven Soderbergh's four-and-a-half-hour epic about Ernesto "Che" Guevara and a unique film that stands on its own and speaks for itself.     The film picks up slightly after the events of "Che: Part One  —The Argentine" (2008) and follows Guevara, once again portrayed by Benicio Del Toro, from his exploits in Bolivia through his capture and execution. The story of Guevara in Bolivia is not as well-known as that of his time in Cuba, but it is just as controversial.     Making a film about Che Guevara, an extremely polarizing figure, is potentially dangerous. Making two films about him could be considered lunacy, but somehow Soderbergh has avoided this pitfall. The film explores the actual events of Che's life with little embellishment and only slips into reverence, falling for the popular cult of Che, once or twice.     At the beginning of "Guerrilla," Guevara arrives in Bolivia to assist in starting an armed struggle to liberate the peasants who he feels are forced to work and live in less than ideal conditions. After his rise to notoriety during the events of the Cuban Revolution, Che has to disguise himself in order to get into Bolivia, entering under the guise of a diplomatic figure.     Once in Bolivia, Guevara, first under the name Ramon and later Fernando, sets up a militant rebel force. He trains volunteers, and as they travel the country they attempt to gain the trust of some of the Bolivians, helping the peasants as much as they can with medical and monetary problems. All of the good will in the world, however,  does little to cover the fact that Guevara is very obviously an outsider whom the natives will never trust.     "Guerilla" is presented in a different film aspect ratio and done in a different film format than "The Argentine." Generally, it has a more stripped-down feel. The majority of the film is done with handheld cameras, without the use of cranes or dollies. Where "The Argentine" is more or less a Hollywood affair with intricate sets and much exposition, "Guerilla" takes place mostly in the rainforest and in small peasant villages, and the action moves fairly quickly.     The level of violence in "Guerilla" is shocking at times, mainly because the characters who are so often shot and killed actually feel like real people. Whether or not the audience relates to the cause or sympathizes with the fighters is irrelevant. One might feel nothing when Che is killed, but when a peasant teenager, driven to join the rebel forces by the situation in his hometown, dies in battle it is a saddening event.     Soderbergh, Del Toro and scriptwriters Peter Buchman and Benjamin A. van der Veen have done an extremely thorough job researching Che, and it shows. Though there are many characters to keep track of, the film seldom gets confusing. All of the supporting characters are played by virtually unknown actors, save for a puzzling cameo by none other than Matt Damon as a local religious figure. But thankfully, the unknowns manage to keep up with Del Toro who shines in the title role.     The Che Guevara of "Guerilla" is older and somewhat weaker than he is during his time in Cuba. His hair and beard have grown into a wild mane around his face, bringing to mind classical representations of Don Quixote, who, much like Che, was driven on a seemingly insane quest. Also, Che's asthma constantly plagues him. As Del Toro wheezes and gasps through asthma attacks, the audience may feel short of breath themselves. It is a truly inspired performance.     One does not need to be educated about Guevara's life and battles to appreciate the artistry that has gone into the making of this film. He is not celebrated, not mourned, or put on a pedestal and proselytized about; rather, he is put in his environment and observed. As director Oliver Hirschbiegel brought the idea of Hitler to something of a flesh-and-blood understanding in 2004's "Downfall," so Soderbergh does here with Ernesto "Che" Guevara, and this, certainly, viewers can appreciate.


The Setonian
Arts

Mikey Goralnik | Paint The Town Brown

Hugh Grant, who I hate, made a career out of playing the same person, each one as sniveling, perpetually flummoxed and charming as the last. However, as he so accurately shows in "Gran Torino" (2009), Clint Eastwood — whose coolness has inspired me to name my first three children Clint, East and Wood, regardless of their genders — has made an even more successful career out of arguably even less variation. Harry Callahan, William Munny and Walt Kowalski all have the same skills and the same flaws and shamelessly kill similar amounts of people. The only way to tell them apart is to measure the relative elasticity of the character's skin — if flesh clings to his bones, then its Callahan, if it doesn't, its Kowalski, and if it kind-of does, its Munny. And yet, if I could "Talented-Mr.-Ripley" anybody over the age of 65, it would no doubt be Eastwood.     Is my disparity in preference hypocritical? Should my hate for Hugh Grant and his one dimension apply to the equally limited Clint Eastwood? No, and here's why: Clint Eastwood's characters are really cool, and Hugh Grant's characters are really lame.     Enter Department of Eagles, technically a "side project" duo featuring Grizzly Bear songwriter, guitarist and vocalist Daniel Rossen, but more accurately a smaller, leaner version of Grizzly Bear. While some musicians start side projects to explore musical interests that their primary group ignores, Rossen (and non-Bear Fred Nicolaus) uses DoE to explore vocal harmonies, guitar tones and phrases and ambiance roughly identical to those he and his bandmates mastered on Grizzly Bear's instant-classic 2006 release "Yellow House." Do I hold my nose high, spitting on Rossen for his unwillingness to expand his horizons or challenge himself to do something new?     Hell no. In fact, I shell out way too much money to see him do his thing live. DoE may sound a lot like Grizzly Bear, but Grizzly Bear's music — especially Rossen's contribution to it — is so intelligent, so arrestingly pretty and so like everything I want to hear from an indie rock band that, in the absence of any new Grizzly Bear records, I will gladly take Rossen doing Grizzly Bear Lite, which is essentially what the DoE show at the Brattle Theater was.     "Around the Bay," built around delicate guitar fingerpicks and Rossen's cherubim soprano, for example, sounded like a less haunting version of "Yellow House" standout "Little Brother," only without the orchestra of backing instruments. You didn't have to squint to see the similarities in mood and instrumentation between the intro of "House" song "On a Neck, on a Spit" and whimsical DoE tune "Floating on the Lehigh," which feels and sounds like a pared down version of the Grizzly Bear song. And "Balmy Night," the last song on DoE's 2007 release "In Ear Park," essentially digests "Little Brother," "Easier," and "Reprise" into a thinner, less moving version of "Yellow House," which, to me, is both logical and laudable for someone who played a central role in arranging that record.     Not only should we expect the same musical vision with which Rossen imbues "Yellow House" to figure into his non-Bear songwriting, but for him to be able to even come close to replicating the uniquely ephemeral atmosphere of that record is a genuine achievement.     The only disappointment was how unfunny Nicolaus and Rossen were. I expected hilarious banter from the guys who named an EP "Noam Chomsky Spring Break" (2003), but their painfully awkward exchanges left me unsatisfied. But while their comedic prowess didn't live up to my predictions, their music definitely did. Yes, DoE sounds a lot like Grizzly Bear, but as far as I'm concerned, sounding like a band that A) you're in and B) is awesome is far from an assailable creative choice.


The Setonian
Arts

FROM THE OFFICE of THE TUFTS DAILY

Dear REAL-D 3D Cinema,     Our relationship has not always seen the smoothest sailing, and we need to talk. We don't know whether we should love you or hate you, but the one thing we keep asking ourselves is, "Why?".     Why do you exist?     We live in three dimensions. Honest-to-God 3-D. Not your "It's like I can touch you!" 3-D illusion, but the actual "I can touch you," 3-D of shapes, textures, depth and yes, dimensions!     You take on so many forms. Sometimes you're in our faces: You pretend to shoot us, to splash us with water and, sometimes, when you're "My Bloody Valentine 3-D" (2009), to stab out someone's eye with a pix-axe and hurl it at us or poke us in the eyes with a horny teen's nipples. Other times you're mellow and laid-back, and we remember why we fell for you in the first place. You set up a depth of field. You make us feel like we're watching more than a movie.     You're cool, baby.     But why do you make stupid decisions? Why are you presenting "Jonas Brothers: The 3D Concert Experience" (2009) or "Hannah Montana/Miley Cyrus: Best of Both Worlds Concert Tour" (2008) in 3-D? What's the deal with "U2 3D" (2007)? No one needs The Edge in 3D for Christ's sake!     If you promise to be cool we'll give you another chance. If good directors decide to utilize you, maybe there's a future for us. But God help you if James Cameron's "Avatar" (2009) sucks.     You're trying, and we get it. You've ditched those red and blue glasses for the new plastic ones. They even look a little like Ray-Ban Wayfarers, and we dig wearing sunglasses inside at night  without looking like total douchebags.     Thanks for trying, really, but you have a ways to go until you prove that you're more than a gimmick and worth the extra $2 per movie ticket. For now, let's just be friends. Best, The Daily Arts Department


The Setonian
Arts

Keyboardist brings pop-sensibility to energetic Tufts band Party Hat

                Following a recent performance at Cambridge music club T.T. The Bear's Place, the Daily's Matt DiGirolamo sat down with sophomore Ben Anshutz of Tufts band Party Hat to talk about influences, piano rock and fake mustaches. Matthew DiGirolamo: Tell us a little about Party Hat; how it started and what type of music you play? Ben Anshutz: The drummer (junior Alex Berdoff) and the guitar player (junior Aaron Wishnick) went to high school together and then both came to Tufts and wanted to keep making music. So, they started making flyers and telling friends. Then they got this singer their freshman year ... They were together as an entity, and then they were looking for a keyboard player about two years ago when I was still in high school. When I got to Tufts I found a flyer by chance; come to think of it, it wasn't a flyer so much as a torn-off piece of paper that said "keyboardist wanted" with a phone number stuck to the wall. I can say that this is the best thing that I have done at Tufts. It's really a lot of fun. I guess as far as the type of music we play, we'd be loosely defined as alternative rock. Think of lasers coming from every musical orifice, more like stadium rock. We are just goofy and silly people in general. At our show [at T.T. The Bear's Place on 1/27], we [gave] away free fake mustaches if you signed up for our mailing list. We even wore them at one point during our show. MD: If you could compare your music to another band, who would it be? BA: There is no one band that we are taken off of, but there are doses of Incubus, Maroon 5 and Head Automatica. It's music for the head and the hips. There's lots going on, so it's fun for us to play. For people who are into music, the style is really danceable. MD: What type of musical influences does the band have? BA: Before I was in the band, there was almost a metal influence. I brought more of a pop-sensibility to the group, just because I play a lot of jazz and old pop like Billy Joel and Elton John. Having keys in the band moved it away from metal naturally. MD: You used to do solo stuff right? BA: Still do! MD: Is that still active? BA: Yeah, I play a little bit of guitar too and so I play around campus or in Boston depending [on] if it's keys and vocals or just an acoustic guitar thing. I am a singer-songwriter myself too, and I am also in two other bands. So I am still writing a lot of music, mostly in the Ben Folds style since that is a big influence on me. MD: As a keyboardist, what do you think of someone like Andrew McMahon (of Jack's Mannequin and Something Corporate) who has become a huge success through playing piano and rocking out on that during shows? BA: I definitely think it's a genre that is not explored enough. It's always good when an artist takes piano out of the world of jazz or synthesis-wizard stuff. Making rock music more piano-centric has not been tapped enough, and it is fun to play. That is where my heart truly lies — in music — and more of what I listen to often. MD: Where does the name "Party Hat" come from? BA: We were at first going to be Interrobang, but then we found out that another band in the Boston area had that, so it was a bummer. Aaron [Wishnick, a junior and the band's guitarist] came into practice like two days after we found out the name was taken and he said "Alright guys, how about Party Hat?" There was no big discussion or "it-came-to-me-in-a-dream" moment. MD: Are you guys planning to do any recording? BA: We have not officially released an EP of material that we are waiting on. We are in the midst of tidying up a few songs so we can release an album by the end of the year. MD: Are you planning on staying with Party Hat for a while? BA: Aaron and I were talking about this the other day actually. There are good environments to make music in, and bad environments to make music in, depending on the creative element of the people and who has control or who is fighting for it. Party Hat is the ideal situation; we hang out outside of practice and we are on the same page when it comes to writing and performing songs. Everyone in the band is making himself hard to be replaced since everyone seems to be in their element in the band. I cannot describe how great it feels to write music with these guys. It's super-rewarding. MD: If someone offered you a record contract tomorrow, would you take it? BA: Definitely, but I don't think we'd drop out of school. We'd need to have a discussion and decide if maybe we'd want to take a semester off. Party Hat will perform at Tufts' own Hotung Café on Feb. 27. For more information about the band, visit myspace.com/partyhatband.


The Setonian
Arts

Nothing 'Missing!' at Barbara Krakow Gallery

    Those who believe that absence makes the heart grow fonder are bound to enjoy the newest exhibition at the Barbara Krakow Gallery on Newbury Street. The show displays works that seem to be longing for something in a way that makes their incompleteness both provocative and enjoyable.     "Missing!" is a compilation of works by twelve different contemporary artists that, at first, seem to have little in common. The title,  however, provides a unique and useful way to approach each piece and to find the thread linking them all together. In this show, the theme of the exhibition, rather than the works themselves, is the most stimulating aspect of the visitor's experience.     Upon entering the gallery, the viewer is at once confronted with the show's most prominent work, "Car on Bricks" (2008), by South African born Robin Rhode. The piece is a monumental wall drawing that immediately invokes Sol LeWitt's famous works done in the same medium. In spite of this, "Car on Bricks" is inherently different from LeWitt's abstract designs because it is a simplified, yet rather life-like, representation of a common sedan.     This work relates to Rhode's earlier performance pieces in which he would draw a common object like a bicycle on a wall and interact with it as though it was real. The removal of the artist from this piece leaves the viewer with a simple drawing which is juxtaposed by two piles of brick replacing the missing wheels. While the car symbolizes motion, the immovability associated with bricks negates that idea. In addition, the contrast between the reality of the bricks and the fiction associated with a drawing of a car, creates a further sense of opposition in the work.     The lack of an actual car relates directly to the desire associated with not having enough money to possess a car. Although this piece relates to consumerism and capitalism by engaging the idea of longing for an extravagant object, other works in the show point to less tangible absences.     Joseph Grigely's "Songs Without Words" (2008) is a piece that compiles twelve newspaper clippings of singers and musicians into a minimalist grid, drawing attention to the grand gestures and gaping mouths of the performers. If the piece consisted of only one photo it would have little impact, but the presence of so many voiceless musicians together makes the viewer painfully aware of the lack of sound in the almost silent gallery setting.     "Collection of Ten Plaster Surrogates" (1982/92) by Allan McCollum takes on the theme of absence in a completely different manner. From a distance, this piece appears to be a set of ten framed, rectangular paintings arranged in a crowded space. But these paintings lack any sort of definable subject, as McCollum has covered them completely in black paint; all the paintings are exactly the same except for their size and the color of their frames.     Furthermore, as the viewer comes closer to the paintings, it becomes clear that each one is actually a single object — consisting of frame, matting and the central, monochromatic subject. This set directly relates to McCollum's earlier works in which he was concerned with the relationship between art and mass production. Each of the "Plaster Surrogates" is handmade and unique due to slight variations, yet they overtly contradict the idea of a traditional painting and make the viewer rethink his understanding of art objects.     The central theme of this exhibition conveys a setting in which the relationship among all of the works is incredibly powerful. While each piece is interesting on its own, they all come together to create something that is rarely found in galleries these days: a grand, museum-worthy idea for a show. It is not a one-man artist retrospective or a collection of Impressionist paintings, but a creatively designed experience that leaves the viewer questioning the importance of completeness in a world where the thirst for something more is never quenched.     Although the price of artwork is enough to scare away most college students, the friendly and helpful staff create a welcoming environment in which to enjoy this unique approach to contemporary art, making this gallery exhibition a worthwhile stop during any routine Newbury Street shopping trip.


The Setonian
Arts

Revolutionary film's portrayal of Che Guevara ignites controversy

    One would not be remiss in guessing that "Che: Part I — The Argentine" (2009) would be full of praise for one of the 20th century's most controversial and iconic figures. Yet as soon as the film starts rolling, the viewer is drawn into the real, less glamorized story behind this film: the Cuban Revolution.     The film opens with a geography lesson, acquainting the viewer with Cuba's provinces and large cities, the very places that are the setting for the revolution explored later in the film.     The action begins with the titular Ernesto "Che" Guevara (played by Benicio Del Toro) and Fidel Castro (Demián Bichir) having a dinner-table discussion about the injustices of the Cuban dictatorship under then-President Fulgencio Batista. After this discussion, the film's focus appears to shift toward Guevara himself, but, in reality, the revolution remains the focus.     Whereas other movies depicting Che Guevara's life, such as "The Motorcycle Diaries" (2004), have focused on Guevara's personal development and the process by which he formed his ideas, "The Argentine" shows how Guevara puts these ideas into action in the context of the Cuban Revolution.     "The Argentine," directed by Steven Soderbergh, is the first part of a two-part biopic that, when shown together, lasts over four hours. Luckily for audiences, the films are being released separately, and "The Argentine" lasts only an hour and a half. The film takes viewers from the shores of Mexico (where Guevara and 81 other revolutionaries first set sail to Cuba) to Havana and the eventual successful overthrow of Batista's Cuban dictatorship.     The film's main storyline is interspersed with scenes in New York where Guevara presents his case to the United Nations and explains the rationale behind the revolution. These segments of the film are shown in black and white. The shift from the vibrant colors of the Cuban setting to the subdued New York palate lets the viewer focus on what Guevara is saying. His speech reveals his reasons for participating in the revolution in Cuba, despite the fact that he himself is Argentinean.     One cannot help but admire the level of detail put into making the film feel as authentic as possible. The black-and-white New York segments feel like archival footage; the picture is grainier and the speeches are taken word for word from Guevara's actual speeches to the United Nations. When the film moves to the dense forests of the Cuban countryside, the outstanding sound design connects viewers to the action. The audience can hear every crackling leaf and twig that breaks under the boots of Cuban guerrillas as they make their way closer and closer to Havana.     "The Argentine" has come under fire for being biased toward the notorious and divisive man. Some see him as a symbol of freedom from oppression and injustice, while for others he is a reminder of the brutality and violence that accompanied the Cuban Revolution.     While "The Argentine" fails to convey the full extent of Guevara's cruelty, it would be unfair to say that it glorifies him in any way, despite the constant reminders of Guevara's unwavering commitment to his own principles and ideals. When the Cuban revolutionaries are poised to take Havana, for example, Guevara orders one of his soldiers who had stolen a car and decided to drive it to Havana to turn back instead of allowing his brigade to arrive in stolen property. Nevertheless, for those who view Guevara's legacy as one of excessive violence, perhaps the lack of a clear condemnation of Guevara's questionable tactics is reason enough to shun the film.     Anyone who chooses to see this movie will leave the theater asking questions. The film's hesitance to definitively portray Guevara as a man committed to false ideas or horrific tactics makes it hard for the viewer to decide how to feel about his actions.     This film is especially poignant and timely because Hugo Chavez, the current president of Venezuela, has recently made statements against American imperialism similar to Guevara's at the United Nations. "The Argentine" confronts viewers with a realization that the virtues of capitalism aren't as strong and reliable as they were thought to be, and it is through this atmosphere of uncertainty and self-doubt that the film makes audience members ask themselves, "Do I agree with this guy or not?"


The Setonian
Arts

Mall Cop' is a laughable attempt at comedy

    When a movie handily wins a box office weekend, it is generally a highly anticipated release, one that might even change the way viewers perceive cinema. This is not the case with "Paul Blart: Mall Cop" (2009). With its well-timed release over the long weekend, and the absence of other family-friendly films, Sony Pictures churned out a profit on something that didn't deserve to make over $30 million.     The film (if you could call it that) stars Kevin James as Paul Blart, a bumbling mall security officer who has to save the mall and some some hostages from a group of thieves. After the opening credits, the camera shows a training field where new recruits are working to become state troopers, and Blart, who needs to pass the obstacle course to get his badge, predictably fails before he reaches the finish line.     Blart, a single father whose wife left him after she gained citizenship through marriage, has a hopeless crush on Amy (played by Jamya Mays), a kiosk saleswoman in the mall who sells hair extensions from a little store called "Unbeweavable." Other minor characters in the film come into play at different moments, but none of the roles do anything to save the movie from its utter and terrible cinematic failure.     Most of the film's humor relies on the fact that Paul Blart is fat, happy and single. The jokes — or physical humor — include Paul falling on someone, getting stuck in a tight space and passing out from his hypoglycemia (the movie's only gross-out scene). In addition, his daughter sets him up with an online dating profile, which does nothing to help his love life.     The film's attempt at comedy is often too predictable to be enjoyed. Picture the famous scene in "Die Hard" (1988) where John McClane crawls through the rafters to subdue terrorists. Now picture an oversized Kevin James crawling in the same type of rafters to subdue skateboard-riding punks trying to steal from every store in the mall. Instead of a masterfully-crafted action scene, Blart's weight causes the vents to fall from the ceiling and knock out the morons below.     Yet another try for comedic relief relies on the fact that Blart rides around on a Segway, and is generally disrespected by patrons in the mall. While something can be said for Kevin James doing all of his own stunts, being dragged by a man in a motorized wheelchair isn't really enough to make this movie entertaining. To be fair, college students may not be the chosen audience for this film, but it is still hard to chuckle at any of its jokes.     "Mall Cop" rests entirely on Kevin James' shoulders since the supporting cast of unknowns doesn't add much to the plot or comedy. The only other thing that carries any weight is the plot, which slowly leads the audience to figure out who the bad guy is and who will be helpful in resolving the movie. But nothing stands out as a shining moment of brilliance or even acceptable film making in this 91-minute piece of junk.     "Paul Blart: Mall Cop" is one of those movies people love to hate; it's silly, unfunny and so bad that it's ridiculous. The movie will obviously appeal to the family that doesn't want to have pickaxes flying at them in "My Bloody Valentine 3D" (2009) or for those who can't stand hearing Clint Eastwood sing at the end of "Gran Torino" (2008). Besides, there is no other family-friendly movie out in cinemas now. For everyone else, it might be a good idea to wait for this one to come out on DVD, or to wait for "Pink Panther 2" (2009) next week, but don't get your hopes up.


The Setonian
Arts

Devin Toohey | The Good, The Bad, and The Ugly

Last semester, despite being a supporter of Barack Obama and fearful of four years of John McCain and Sarah Palin, I could not help but worry what would become of popular culture in the wake of a capable president.     The last eight years were a delightful mix of jokes about an incompetent president and an evil vice president in the humor realm and thinly veiled allegories of a government that had overstepped its boundaries in the dramatic field. Now change has come, so indulge me, if you will, as I try to foretell what we'll be getting with this new administration.     Let's start off in the comedic sector. Bush was an easy target, a veritable buffet of jokes from his manners of speaking to horrible decisions to absurd ideas of how terrorists ultimately thought. Obama is not. However, on Inauguration Day, the Onion released an article, "Obama Inauguration Speech Ruined By Incessant Jackhammering." Suddenly we had our answer. Obama would be a horrible village idiot, but he's going to make the perfect straight man for all presidential humor. With his calm demeanor, his difficulty to excite and his general adherence to reason, the president is the perfect character to be thrown into the middle of chaotic nonsense, wacky assistants and aggravations of all shapes and sizes. Every sketch and article will be a test of how far we can push the fictionalized version of our commander-in-chief before he cracks. I personally will not be satisfied till I see a faux-Obama channel Carl Winslow and shout to our former president, "George! Go home! Go home! Go home!"     Now, dramatic storytelling is a bit trickier. At first, some people were predicting another early sixties: i.e. the Kennedys and Camelot, and maybe even that Marilyn Monroe would come back to life so that Obama could do the nasty with her. Essentially, bright, cheerful visions of a Great Big Beautiful Tomorrow. But for all of the times that Obama has talked about the message of hope, his words are anything but blindly idealistic or optimistic. In his inauguration speech he acknowledged how deep our country is in the muck at the moment, how it is our own responsibility to lift ourselves back up and even how we have to curtail our excess consumption of resources.     So what will the quintessential Obama administration drama be? One of redemption, I feel. Or, should our country sink even deeper, failed redemption. "The Wrestler" (2008) could be the prototype of what may become this quintessential Obama-era story. It tells of someone whose life has gone to the crapper, and he has no one to blame but himself. He must own up to his past mistakes and try to improve what he can.     That the mistakes were his (or ours) is the key difference. The film "V for Vendetta" (2005) changed the original comic book's message. In the comic book, people are to blame for the government they have. The film invented conspiracies and fake terrorist attacks to put the fault completely on a select few in charge. The film is a Bush administration movie through and through. Were "V for Vendetta" to enter production now rather than four years ago, we might see a bit more faithfulness to the graphic novel.     Of course, only time will truly tell in what ways pop culture will reflect our new president. Till then, I'll be keeping just as anxious of an eye on that as I do on his executive actions.


The Setonian
Arts

Merriweather Post Pavillion" rains on dedicated fans' parade

                From deep in the jungle of Baltimore, Maryland, the members of Animal Collective have been the leaders of the neo-psychedelic scene for nearly a decade. Now, one year after they received national recognition on "Late Night with Conan O'Brien," these weathered noisemakers have released their ninth LP, "Merriweather Post Pavillion" (2009).     Years ago, Animal Collective produced lo-fi sounds that fell under the banner of "freak folk." After collaborating with folk legend Vashti Bunyan on an EP in 2005, however, Animal Collective blossomed within the still-small arena of experimental folk. Their style was sparse and often tedious, but included a happily serene demeanor.     Soon, Animal Collective began experimenting with samplers, synthesizers and lots of delay. The result was 2007's masterpiece "Strawberry Jam," which left fans wondering how the band could possibly live up to its own standard. The answer, it appears, was to do it again.     One element of Animal Collective's mysticism was its ability to create a new, unheard genre with each release. But "Merriweather Post Pavillion," while still a musical success, does not do anything drastically new and sounds like a mellower extension of "Strawberry Jam." Only long-term fans will be disappointed, though; for other listeners, the album will still represent the musical fringe.     However, despite its "fringe" status, "Merriweather Post Pavillion" is suspiciously easy to swallow. There is not a harsh note in the entire album, and layered vocals glide over wet, bass-heavy beats — one surprising new element in Animal Collective's repertoire. Nearly every song on the album is grounded by deep trip-hop rhythms, which make them almost palpable for the listener.      These beats reveal Animal Collective's true pop sensibilities, which will no doubt earn perky new followers and anger those who love them for their earlier spaced-out, fly-away sounds. But both new and old enthusiasts won't be able to deny the satisfaction of hearing these blissfully danceable songs.     In "Merriweather Post Pavilion's" single, "My Girls," Animal Collective seems to take a preemptive strike against critical fans who may charge the band with selling out. The lyrics make a frank statement to the listener and justify why the band cares about material things. Vocalists Avey Tare and Panda Bear explain in billowing sing-song, "With a little girl and by my spouse/ I only want a proper house."     Avey Tare and Panda Bear's families are directly referenced in several other songs, which illuminates the overall feeling of joy and love in the album. At least half of the tracks are love songs, but they are so genuinely festive and light that no cold-hearted hipster can complain.     With the themes of peace and love at the forefront of the album, Animal Collective proves itself to be a psychedelic band. The album's cover art produces an illusion of movement an unmistakable ode to LSD and the echo and warping effects make vocal and instrumental sound bites disorienting. However, such distortion tricks are old hat for the band, which makes this album seem less remarkable than Animal Collective's more freshly eclectic work.     The highlight of the album is its closer, "Brothersport." As usual, the band's vocals become indecipherable between lucid chants of "Open up your throat," a nod to the pleasure of, ahem, singing.     Other songs on the album are a celebration of the band's independence from mainstream expectations. Each track reliably offers creative structure mixed with steady pop- and hip-hop-inspired beats, but it is this reliability that blurs the distinctness of each song as well as the album's unique place in Animal Collective's discography.     Once spacey weirdoes filling songs with grunts and caws, Animal Collective has settled down to make music suitable for Earth. Who can blame them? As explicitly presented in the album's lyrics, the band members have wives and a few kids between them. If there was ever a time for Animal Collective to forgo ten-minute jams for snappier hooks, it's now.     "Merriweather Post Pavilion" is a contagious, inspiring musical work on its own. Even so, given Animal Collective's groundbreaking musical history, this album is unlikely to live up to long-time fans' expectations.


The Setonian
Arts

Notorious' takes a superficial look at a rap legend

    A film destined for the big screen, "Notorious" is a biopic about the ‘90s rapper, Notorious B.I.G. Though the production value can't touch that of its Hitchcockian predecessor of the same name, "Notorious" nonetheless has its own unique, fast-paced style. Newcomer Jamal Woolard — himself a Brooklyn rapper — does a great job capturing Biggie's style, from his swagger to his music, and the film actually benefits from his inexperience.     Christopher Wallace, aka Biggie Wallace, aka Notorious B.I.G., is widely considered one of the greatest rappers of all time. Originally a drug dealer in Brooklyn, Biggie lived for 24 years before his murder, which remains unsolved. He became one of the most important figures in East Coast hip hop and was entangled in East Coast/West Coast hip-hop battles, assault charges and many problematic relationships. In this way, Biggie embodied all the glamour and violence of the '90s rap scene.     The cast plays off of the confidence Woolard brings to the screen. Two supporting actresses, Antonique Smith and Naturi Naughton, portray two of his failed romances with spunk and fire. Angela Bassett does a great job in the role of his mother, and the whole cast adds level of richness and character to the film.     The cast fails, however, when it comes to examining Biggie's character: The movie skips through the details of his biography and gives a superficial, cartoonish portrayal of his life rather than an in-depth look at the real Notorious B.I.G. Watching "Notorious" is almost like reading Wikipedia.org: It is interesting, even entertaining, but the information seems trivial and slightly biased.     Much of the time, the movie's lack of biographical depth doesn't matter because the story is so much fun. The scene when Biggie records "Juicy," for example, is especially entertaining because the movie does not need to dive too deep for hilarious material. The actors do all the work and manage to communicate the crazed, drug-infused state of affairs.     While some scenes are funny and help to develop Biggie's character, at other points, the plot seems to take the film away from the story of who Biggie was and into what he did. The narration of "Notorious" is partly to blame. Although Woolard's acting is great, his voiceovers are not, and when he narrates, the movie feels rushed and a little sloppy, simply going through the motions of a standard biopic rather than experimenting with or trying anything new.     Unlike its subject matter, "Notorious"-the-movie will not have a major impact on anything because of its superficial treatment  of the titular character. Biggie comes off as a stereotypical heroic figure instead of an actual person with flaws, as the film actively ignores the rougher aspects of his life. For example, the movie skims over the details of his atrocious treatment of his girlfriends, which may have to do with the fact that one of the producers is Biggie's mother, Voletta Wallace. It is her mark, not the rapper's, which dominates many of the scenes, leading the audience to see Biggie's temper in curious ways. He is shown getting angry over badly sized shoes, but not many other, more personal issues.     If the movie were more willing to take an unbiased approach to the main character, viewers would have found a more interesting, multi-layered person.     "Notorious" is certainly a good movie that captures the spirit, excitement and drama of '90s rap. It fails, however, to take the risks needed to get inside the real Notorious B.I.G., ultimately keeping this movie from becoming great.