MSPCA clarification

I am writing to clarify a few things stated in the article on Tufts University School of Veterinary Medicine's canine bone healing research ("Grafton campus community deals with aftermath of controversial animal deaths" Feb. 9). When the research protocol began to gain attention, we strongly encouraged the students and the University to work together and to explore carefully all alternative options. The Massachusetts Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (MSPCA) did not participate in any way with any evaluation of the merits, value, or scientific aspects of this project. The MSPCA believes in the "3 R's" -- Reducing the numbers of animals in research, Replacing whole animals with other methodologies whenever possible, and Refining protocols to reduce any stress or pain involving animals. And thus the MSPCA believed that extensive discussion about all non-lethal options to gain the knowledge intended to be derived from this experiment needed to take place. And we know that Tufts has a history of progressive use of alternatives.

In the article, I was quoted as saying this experiment was "appropriate" and that has been taken by some to imply that the MSPCA supported or approved of this research. That is not the case. My comment was intended to refer to the fact that it appeared as if no laws were being broken and the University had complied with existing regulatory requirements, and that it was appropriate for students to address their concerns with the appropriate Tufts committees that deal with research involving animals.

We do believe and hope that the discussion about research protocols that has arisen from this project is very important and will ultimately benefit the animals and the University.



Carter Luke

Vice President MSPCA