The members of AACT would like to thank the Daily for its recognition of Asian American Studies (AAS) as a worthy cause. We would, however, like to clarify a few potentially misleading points made in the editorial published on Friday, April 29.
The editorial states that "an aspiring political scientist may desire a great deal of knowledge about the rapidly growing and changing nations of the Asian continent." Again and again, we have distinguished Asian American Studies from Asian Studies. These are two distinct disciplines with different methodologies and areas of focus - a basic fact that seems to be misunderstood in the first reason cited by the Daily.
The editorial asks us "to remember that the addition of more AAS (as well as other ethnic studies) will benefit students of all ethnic and cultural groups." We have not forgotten. We have long declared that everyone - of all races - will benefit from AAS, as it would contribute to a more complete and accurate understanding of America and the world. We are glad that African American and Latino/a Studies are already part of Tufts, but Asian American Studies remains neglected as a crucial piece of history.
The editorial argues "an increase in faculty would provide the Jumbo Asian communities with positive role models and culturally relevant mentors." AACT has consistently demanded that Asian Americanist professors not be confused with Asian American faculty. While we appreciate and need minority faculty on campus, what we are demanding is appropriately trained scholars specializing in AAS.
Finally, the editors advise AACT to "broaden its appeal and seek to work with Jumbos of all stripes." Let it be known that "Jumbos of all stripes" were part of the protest. AACT has worked with and continues to work with students across race, gender, and sexuality. With increased and accurate representation of this issue, we hope the appeal of AAS will spread even further.
Thomas Chen '04 and the members of AACT
