Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Show Preview | B.E.A.T.S is getting ready to bang

Some people like to play the guitar. Others prefer to wail on the saxophone. A few, however, are content to jam on the closest object. The members of student group Bangin' Everything at Tufts, or B.E.A.T.S, fall into the third category. Warming up with a guest performance at the Sarabande! show last night, the group will showcase its talents solo this evening at their first annual spring show, "Low Key, High Profile." The show, which will feature a guest appearance by breakdance group Turbo, promises to display a wide variety of unusual instruments: from buckets and pipes to flanges and radiator pieces, no object will go un-banged. For those of you that spend hours in Dewick tapping silverware against glasses and salt shakers or for those who look upon Stomp with awe, B.E.A.T.S knows where you're coming from. Founded in 2002, the group has attempted to buck college musical norms from the start. "We thought a Stomp-esque group would be a nice variation among the thousands of Tufts a capella groups," said junior co-founder Stephen Leichman. "Truth be told, I decided to start it because I auditioned for both the Beelzebubs and Cheap Sox and didn't make either." Leichman, however, refused to be denied. "I figured if I can't make it into a group, start a group. So I did." The show is a big step for B.E.A.T.S; although they have performed as guests for other Tufts groups such as TDC and the Jackson Jills, and at venues like Kids' Day and Oxfam, "Low Key, High Profile" marks their first feature performance. "It's exciting that we are at the level where we can start hosting a show each semester with the other popular performance groups around campus," said president junior Chris Archer. The feat is especially impressive considering the relative infancy of the group. In Archer's opinion, "the very idea that we are hosting our first annual spring show after only two and a half years of existence is incredible." Although unique to Tufts, B.E.A.T.S is part of a larger trend of percussion ensembles. Drawing upon African, Latin, Japanese, and other traditional rhythms and beats, percussion groups have long held a place in many cultures and countries around the world from Indonesia's gamelan to West Africa's drums. Percussion groups didn't burst into mainstream American music, however, until the early 1990s with the group Stomp. First introduced to American audiences in a Coca-Cola commercial in 1993, Stomp has been playing shows in New York City ever since. Likewise, performance groups such as Blue Man Group have helped to raise awareness about other unorthodox music forms. Just as for these other groups, however, times have not always been as easy for B.E.A.T.S. Both Archer and Leichman fondly remember a time when instruments were confined to what they "could find around campus." Since then, things have changed. "Now we are fortunate enough to have a budget from the TCU Treasury that we can go to Home Depot and buy all sorts of crazy stuff with," said Archer. This "crazy stuff" includes, but is not limited to, water jugs, paint buckets, PVC pipes and metal cans. This uniqueness has undoubtedly aided in B.E.A.T.S' rapid development. "The distinct originality of our group has been successful in attracting extremely talented percussionists, which has allowed us to develop quicker than we imagined," said Archer. And although the group has been on the rise as of late, "Low Key, High Profile" will be their last major appearance of the semester. "After this show, we are probably going to just do a few shows at outside gatherings because of the stress that comes with finals," said Archer. "But next year we'll be back doing the bigger shows again." And their paint cans and radiator pieces will be right there with them.


The Setonian
News

Brett Weiner| Force Perspective

It's springtime, which means two things: girls tanning out on the residential quad and an influx of big budget, star driven movies. So it's time for another Summer Movie Round-Up! Before I start, I must explain my unique rating system. You see, I don't like giving movies stars, numbers or poorly made graphics of turkeys. Instead, I classify films by Andersons. The following are the four categories of Anderson: P.T. Anderson. A grand opus that rises above the traditional conventions of cinema to deliver an amazing visceral and aural experience. This category is usually dominated by dramas with touches of comedy, but anything that is superb gets this rating. Wes Anderson. A mixed bag. Some people will swear by it, but others don't understand, hate and fear it. Also, this category includes anything that is strangely whimsical or has the line "O. R. they?" in the movie. Paul Anderson. A big budget disaster (not to be confused with a big budget disaster movie). This is a film that was made purely for profit, got neutered by test audiences and the marketing department, and is released to critical panning worldwide. This category is filled with a glut of films that start with the words "produced by Jerry Bruckheimer." Mr. Anderson. An awesome action flick. Basically the opposite of a Paul Anderson, this movie is a big budget success. In recent years, Mr. Andersons have been given almost exclusively to comic book films. So, now that we've covered the basics, let's begin: "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" Good news: The Hitchhiker's movie is made and coming out! Bad news: Douglas Adams died before the movie was completed. The question: Will it remain true to the spirit of the books? Given the fact that it's directed by a music video director whose most famous work in the U.S. is the "Ali G" opening, things look precarious. Rating: Wes Anderson for those who haven't read the books, Paul Anderson for those who have. "Kingdom of Heaven" An epic by Ridley Scott ("Gladiator") with what promises to be copious amounts of swordfights. Some romance will be thrown in, I'm sure. Plus, Orlando Bloom is dreamy. Rating: Using my honed filmic instincts, I'll say this movie will be a Mr. Anderson in P.T. Anderson's clothing. "Monster-in-Law" The next "Meet the Parents?" Probably not. However, it could revive J. Lo's career. Rating: Wes Anderson, unless, of course, you go on a date to see it, in which case you should tell your girlfriend it is a P.T. "Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants" A movie about teenage friends who share jeans over the course of a summer. I can't believe I'm not going to mention "Batman Begins" in order to have enough space to talk about this movie. I'm such an idiot. I'd rather have open-heart surgery performed on me at a rave by an epileptic then see this cinematic marvel. This film is like putting candy daggers in your eyes. Rating: Paul Anderson. "War of the Worlds" Spielberg and Cruise. It often doesn't get much better than that. Could teaming a great director with a superstar ever yield lackluster results? Oh, yeah, "The Terminal." Sorry, I forgot. Rating: P.T., unless the ending is made of Spielberg-brand supercheese, in which case I give it a Wes. "The Fantastic Four" I really want to like this movie. Really, I do. I like comic books, and therefore I am already predisposed to liking this movie. However, rumors of budget woes and a lackluster trailer have been ringing like alarm bells. Sadly, I think this may be the disappointment of the summer. Rating: Unfortunately, a Paul Anderson. When the guy that likes "Daredevil" is worried about a comic book movie, you know something is going wrong. "Wedding Crashers" Vince Vaughn is funny. Owen Wilson is funny. Picking up chicks at weddings is funny. Christopher Walken is always funny. I'll be first in line to see this one. Rating: The well-liked offspring of P.T. Anderson and Wes Anderson. I'll call it "Fred, the Baby Anderson." "Charlie and the Chocolate Factory" Tim Burton has decided to remake one of the most classic and amazing kid's movies. Fortunately, I have a feeling Johnny Depp will be a suitable enough replacement for the amazing original Willy Wonka, Gene Wilder. I look forward to this, but may not like some of the changes. Rating: Wes Anderson. Come on, this movie will have enough spare whimsy to feed all the whimsy-starved poor in the whole world. "Stealth" A movie about a robot plane. That gets struck by lighting and develops a mind of its own. And then wants to kill humans. I feel like crying. Rating: Double Paul. Why isn't Bruckhiemer on the credits? "Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith" This is it, the big one. The most anticipated movie of the summer. The movie that will be the final note in a grand opus, tying up loose ends and justifying the existence of Jar-Jar Binks, or the nail in the coffin that has Obi-Wan rolling his eyes in the force-afterlife. People have got a lot riding on this one, and Lucas, who was solely responsible for the direction in the first prequels, is at the helm again. Don't let us down. Rating: Either a P.T. or a Paul. There is only one way to find out for sure. I'll see you in line on May 19.


The Setonian
News

Onward and Upward | Daily eye on the 'Queer Eye' guy

From award-winning documentaries to work in television and commercials to his current work on "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy," Tufts alumnus Josh Seftel (LA '90) has kept busy with directing projects since he graduated - and has won dozens of awards in the process. Seftel describes working on "Queer Eye" as a great experience. "I think it's really fun to work with the cast," he said. "They are really creative, talented people, and it's really fun to collaborate with them. They are actually more fun in person." Seftel is one of several directors of the show. He has directed Some of Queer Eye's most popular episodes including the twin episode (viewers may remember the "make-better" recipients wrestling each other to the ground in their brand-new couture, much to style guru Carson Kressley's chagrin), and a poignant episode featuring a soldier about to leave his family for a tour of duty in Iraq. Although reality TV may be the latest format at which Seftel has tried his hand, the director has applied his talents to a variety of projects. "I really enjoy trying lots of different things," Seftel said. "To me, that's the thing I like most about being a filmmaker; it's such a varied job, it never gets boring and I'm always learning. I like mixing it up." A pre-med, French literature major, Seftel took only two film courses while at Tufts - an ExCollege course on film production and a film history class taught by Associate Dean of the Colleges Jeanne Dillon. Although his undergraduate education did not train him specifically for his current career, he feels fortunate to have focused on his other interests while on the Hill. "On the surface, there's no obvious connection between what I do now and what I studied at Tufts," Seftel said. "I was lucky to have studied something other than film. In order to be a filmmaker, you have to be interested in something and know something about the world. If you don't, you're going to be at a disadvantage." "Queer Eye for the Straight Guy" is a far cry from Seftel's filmmaking start. He made his first effort in the filmmaking arena during his senior year at Tufts: "I had this professor, Seymour Simches - he was my mentor and he was retiring, so I felt it would be really cool to honor him in some way," Seftel said. "I ended up making this film in my free time." The film was seen by a professor in the Romance Languages department, who put Seftel in contact with a team of aid-workers traveling to Romania. Out of this trip came Seftel's award-winning and Emmy-nominated documentary "Lost and Found: The Story of Romania's Forgotten Children." The film exposed the poor living conditions within Romanian orphanages. Amazingly, Seftel made the film without a formal background in film. "I felt like I wasn't very prepared," he said. "It was trial by fire, throwing yourself into it and learning by doing." The "learning-by-doing" experiment paid off: the documentary went on to win international awards. "I was really happy that the film reached so many people [because] it was such an important topic," Seftel said. "I felt fortunate that my first professional film was so successful, in terms of reaching people, helping people make some change." Education and social change have remained an important component of Seftel's work. "I was always interested in teaching and I wanted to be a doctor while I was at Tufts, so when I decided to do some film work, I wanted to deal with subjects related to medicine and helping people," he said. "I think that comes across in my work. I am drawn to that, and it's something I try to do in most of my work." The filmmaker, who helped to start up the Tufts chapter of Amnesty International while in college, continued to pursue his interest in human rights, geopolitics and education through his films, which have examined issues ranging from the Mass. senior power movement to learning disabilities. His film "Taking on the Kennedys," which followed the campaign of Kevin Vigilante as he challenged Patrick Kennedy for a Congressional seat, is now used in some political science courses (see box). "Breaking the Mold: the Kee Malesky Story," a fictional work, was made as an educational comedy for children. The arts have been another topic of interest for Seftel, as is evident in his work for CBS and WGBH, the Boston-area PBS affiliate. As a result of this work, Seftel was awarded the National Arts Journalism Program Fellowship from Columbia University. "I had done a lot of work over the last several years about artists with WGBH and CBS News," Seftel said. "I was awarded the fellowship because of my work about artists." Seftel used the year-long fellowship, which began in the fall of 2002, to recharge creatively. "For me, it wasn't so much an education as much as a chance to refill the well," he said. "I was in New York City, and I went to 25 plays, eight operas, five ballets - I think I saw 60 films in that year - and I just sort of immersed myself in the arts and things that interested me. It was kind of an inspirational year." Works-in-progress for Seftel include a pilot for Fox about a gossip columnist: "I wrote it and directed it and it's in development at Fox," he said. Also on his list of upcoming and future projects is a piece for WGBH and a full-length documentary about photographers. For students interested in film as a possible career, Seftel had some words of advice. "If you're interested in going into film, I would learn as much as you can about the things that interest you in the world," he said. "Open yourself up to getting a good, broad education, because more than any sort of film class about how to use a camera and how to edit, you're going to want to be a well-rounded person, so that when you have an opportunity to make a film, you'll have something to say." And although the Fab Five might not approve of the hyper-casual style of Tufts students, Seftel sees nothing wrong with college students' style. "I haven't really looked around the campus lately, but I personally think there is nothing wrong with being sloppy," he said. "I say, enjoy it while you can."


The Setonian
News

Former Denver mayor Webb discusses politics, Democrats

Former Mayor of Denver Wellington Webb spoke to roughly 75 students last night in Goddard Chapel regarding the future of a Democratic Party that is currently out of power and, according to some, out of touch. In 1991, Webb was elected as the first African-American mayor of Denver and served as mayor for a 10 year period, until 2003. During his time as mayor, Webb oversaw the completion of the new Denver International Airport, a sports stadium and an African-American research library. Webb said he is also credited for significantly lowering Denver's crime rate, and improving the educational system. "Being mayor was very satisfying because I got to see my projects realized," he said. Webb said that if he were to run for an office in national politics he would not be able to see his ideas and plans come to fruition as quickly as he experienced as mayor. Webb addressed many issues ranging from urban politics to his vision for the future of the Democratic Party. Aside from his former mayoral position, Webb is the president of the Democratic Mayors Association and has also served as the Vice-Chair of the Democratic National Convention (DNC). During his speech Webb chose to focus on the younger generations and the role they will play in the future of our country's politics. "Our nation needs your help, your ideals, and your selflessness," he said. "We all have the responsibility to give of ourselves, especially those of us who are gifted and luck." Webb said that he was not initially involved in politics during his college years, but that he was more interested in sports. He was an all-conference basketball player at Northeastern Junior College in Sterling, Colo., and upon receiving his Master's degree in Sociology from the University of Northern Colorado in 1971, he was rejected from a teaching position in the Denver school system. Webb said he took this opportunity to follow advice from his grandmother, and he applied for a job at Denver's City Hall. Once he was offered the job, Webb's political career began. He said he credits his grandmother for her emphasis on the importance of political involvement. "Whether you like it or not, politics matters. Either you are part of the solution or other people make the decisions for you," he said. With regard to the current state of the Democratic Party, Webb said the Party needs to work on its message to make it clear and concise, with a consistent message about morals. "We have to stop playing the game not to lose and start playing the game to win," he said. He encouraged those in the audience to become involved in their communities and politics on a local and grassroots level. "The Democratic Party has always been the party of opportunities. We have to take all opportunities that come our way as well as offer opportunities to other. You can make a difference," he said. During his time at the White House under the Clinton administration, Webb said he recalled a late night conversation with President Clinton about a table that was standing in the room at the time. When Webb asked Clinton why the table was significant, Clinton responded that it was the table that Lincoln wrote the Emancipation Proclamation on. Webb said that this moment made him realize just how lucky and fortunate he was to be alive during that place and time in history, as his father never attended college and his great grandparents were directly effected by Lincoln's historic proclamation. He said the Democratic Party cannot afford to take minority voters for granted, as the Democrats have an obligation to social justice and a presence in all 50 states. On the other hand, Webb said he believes the Republican Party is cresting. "People are not happy. One nice thing about democracy is that it's not perfect but it can always be worked on and perfected." Webb said, however, that the Democrats must offer more than just firm opposition. They must also put forward a "succinct" and easily understandable vision for the future that is founded on democratic and moral values.- Dave Mitchell contributed to this article


The Setonian
News

James Gerber | Through the Smokescreen

This semester, I've had the privilege of writing a weekly column for the Tufts Daily. I'd be lying if I said it's been an easy ride; it is a surprisingly tough job, requiring a lot of research and a fairly sizeable time commitment. My reward, however, is watching my peers react and respond to my columns. Every time a column sparks a political debate in a dorm's common room, or, on occasion, a written response to the Daily, I feel even more motivated to find the next hot topic and bring it to the reader's attention. Tufts is one of the most politically active campuses: a fact that we don't get enough credit for. As college students, we have enough on our plate already; we're mostly preoccupied with our classes, work, clubs, internships, jobs and, of course, our social lives. It's often easy to overlook what's going on in the world outside of college. We, as students, should be commended for staying "politically active" amidst all of our other involvements and commitments. That is one of the main reasons I wanted to write a column for the Daily; it would force me to stay informed about news and politics. My goal has been to relay the most interesting stories I find to the Daily's readers. Every week, I hope that that my column will spark a response. I am always pleased to read a Viewpoint contribution about one of my articles, whether it's arguing for or against my stance. It is very important for people our age to take an interest in the future of our country. The decisions that our government makes today will affect not only our generation, but our kids' lives as well as the generations that will follow them. We are repeatedly told that we are tomorrow's movers and leaders. We don't have to wait until tomorrow; we can make a difference today. It was much easier for our parents to be politically active. Their generation was pushed into the political arena by the Civil Rights movement and the Vietnam War. We, on the other hand, must make more of a concerted effort to stay involved. It's hard to get motivated about taxes or Medicare, things that might not directly affect us. Although today's issues may not seem as pressing as those our parents fought for, they are no less important. It depresses me to see how few people our age have voted in the past. Unfortunately, democracy, particularly when it comes to campaigning, is a reactionary process. Candidates will cater to the people that come to the polls. Those demographics that vote the most are rewarded with the most political attention. Young people are traditionally seen as apathetic, and it shows in our voter turnout. If we want our voice to be heard, we have to show politicians that we too can control their fate. I remember hearing how young people would swing the vote in the 2004 Presidential election. Many experts believed our generation would make the difference, and I was encouraged to see a large increase in voter turnout among youth. Roughly 50 percent of people aged 18-29 voted, and our generation made up almost 20 percent of all voters. In the 2000 election, that demographic made up less than 10 percent of voters. This increase in youth participation has forced politicians to spend time courting our votes. One telling example has been the battle over Social Security. President Bush and Congressional Republicans have repeatedly targeted young people in their campaigns for reform. They have made speeches at college campuses and have stressed how they believe the President's plan will make the biggest difference for our generation. The 2004 election was a great start. However, we need to continue to increase the youth turnout and force elected officials to pay attention to our views. As I said before, we do not need to wait for tomorrow to take an active role. I encourage you to debate among your peers, make your opinions known, submit a Viewpoint to the Daily about an issue that moves you. Discussion is the first step towards participation, and what better place for fostering new ideas than a politically active campus.


The Setonian
News

Tim Whelan | Some Kind of Wonderful

Rationalizing one's love for the NFL Draft is trying to explain the inexplicable. Some random Tuesday morning you will find SportScenter going through the top cornerback prospects and your eyes will be opened to how much we desperately need this event, at this time of year. I can't wait for Saturday, and I know I am surrounded by others who are foaming at the mouth for a football fix. That's part of what puts this draft on its own playing field. It comes at a time where the Super Bowl is a vague memory (okay, maybe you can blame that on the booze) and training camp is still a couple months away. The NBA Draft? Please. While entertaining, it comes not more than a couple weeks after the Finals. We are hardly starving for basketball at that point. And even if the NBA did have its draft in say, August, we still wouldn't yearn for it the same way we yearn for this April Day, live from the Marriott Marquis. But what sets the NFL's yearly Youth Movement apart from the NBA's is that the former isn't taking its talent from the local sandboxes and jungle gyms. In the NFL, we know the players, have watched them perform, and while we may not be fully in tune with how each guy will pan out on the pro level, we at least have some semblance of an idea. The same can't be said after, say, last year, when I saw the Celtics take Al Jefferson, let out a "huh?" and then was greeted with clips of him playing against the cast of "Little Rascals." Good stuff. Hey, we got lucky and Big Al has panned out, but for every one of him there's a Kedrick Brown. You see where I'm going with this. Whereas NBA teams develop their depth, they can't rely on the draft to supplement depth. If you aren't in the lottery, great chances are your dude ain't panning out. And as far as the second round goes, off the top of my head I can only think of one pick who ever made something of himself, Nick Van Exel. Then take a look at how many guys picked from lower rounds are scattered around the NFL, and you see what a crapshoot it can be. There's the entertainment factor. Matt Jones, the superfreak quarterback-turned-receiver from Arkansas who runs a 4.37 40 will be drafted towards the end of the first. Are you ever excited about a late first round pick in the NBA? Of course not. I don't think even the GM's know who they're drafting at that point. That's where the entertainment is. It's a science, but even the scientists see their experiments blow up in their faces from time to time. Just ask the Bengals' front office. But like an archaeological dig, you can strike a prize if you just dig enough. ESPN has put together a great campaign to get us to watch this year, where they give us the career paths of late round steals like Zach Thomas, Tom Brady and Hines Ward. They hit the nail on the head with this one; anything can happen, although you don't know it at the time. And that is why my residence is having a Draft party and will stay in tune through that fourth round on the first day, and will at least check in periodically on Sunday. Professional football's version of a playground kickball game (You got him, okay, I'll take that guy then) is the essence of building your program from the ground up. The talking heads have spouted a great deal of info to me over the past month, enough so that I think I am well versed in the ways of what team is in the greatest need for offensive line depth and have had "tweener" defined for me more times than Mel Kiper, Jr. has said "mechanics." I would use this space to acknowledge the much anticipated arrival of Chris Berman back on our screens, but he preempted such a return and is now using "Baseball Tonight" as his forum for '70s jam band references and creating new hand gestures to get his point across. (The man invented the style, I'm pretty sure.) Here is an NFL Draft moment that stands out for me. In 2003, Drew Rosenhaus, slick haired agent/pretend best friend to two hopefuls from the U, Jerome McDougal and Willis McGahee, is sitting in a room with the two young men for all of us to see. I remember McDougal in a Celtics jersey, but obviously I would. If you recall, McGahee's getting drafted in the first round was fully up in the air after his horrific knee injury in the Fiesta Bowl. So what is the best way to make people interested in your client? What is the best way to make teams jealous? "A fake phone call should do the trick," the manipulative yet resourceful Rosenhaus must have thought. So there, on not only mine, but more importantly on the screens of coaches and GM's everywhere, was McGahee, talking on his cell midway through the first round as if it had been "blowin' up" all day But on the other end was actually Rosenhaus, only 15 feet away but out of view of the camera lens, calling his client to make him appear busy. And the Bills, probably thinking someone else might grab him first, snagged McGahee with the 23rd pick, to the shock of Berman and everyone else watching. Just a goofy moment I thought you guys would appreciate. ... But Saturday will be full of them.



The Setonian
News

Goldberg, Katzin face off for TCU presidency

Tufts Community Union (TCU) Presidential candidates TCU Vice President junior Rafi Goldberg and TCU Treasurer junior Jeff Katzin held an hour-long debate over campus issues last night in Pearson Hall. "Everything we talk about is going to be beneficial to Tufts students," Katzin said. Both candidates began by introducing their individual platforms emphasizing their differences from one another. Goldberg began with his "TCU Tomorrow" plan, which focuses on the futures of current students, the TCU Senate and Tufts as an institution. "We need somebody to offer a new vision of what the Senate's going to be in the 21st century," he said. "Real change begins at home." He discussed his plan for internship stipends for students, which "would compliment Summer Scholars very nicely." Further, he said he would increase public speaking in the curriculum, which "would give students advantages in the job market of tomorrow." Katzin introduced his platform, titled "Making JUMBO changes." Within the JUMBO plan, Katzin identified such goals as bettering jobs, creating a tighter community, and ameliorating the housing situation. "This is something I want to do not only for myself but also for the student body," Katzin said. "I think I have the work ethic and determination." Goldberg and Katzin also discussed their experiences on TCU Senate as key differences. In their different roles this year, Katzin and Goldberg said they have differing perspectives of what it's like to work on the TCU Senate. "I've had the budget experience," Katzin said. He went on to stress that his role as TCU Treasurer gave him the opportunity "to fully understand half of what an organization has to do [in order] to become a leader of that organization." In Goldberg's case, he said his role as TCU Vice President gave him "a lot of experience with helping other people's projects work." Both candidates commented on their leadership styles. "To roll with the punches is something you need," Katzin said. "I'm very hands-on." Goldberg said he leans more towards taking a step back from the everyday actions of TCU Senators, and that, as TCU Senate President, his role would be "to be very intimately involved while letting the experts be the experts - it's very important not to over-extend yourself." Student awareness of the TCU Senate was a cause for concern for both candidates. "We need to have the student body not only know what's going on, but participate," Goldberg said. Katzin said he agreed. "We need to put out a Senate publication, like a newsletter, once a month," he said. "You don't have to be a senator to be involved with the Senate." When asked what they would say in their first conversation with University President Lawrence Bacow, the candidates gave completely different answers. Goldberg said he would focus on Bacow's capital campaign and how it could be best allotted at Tufts. "We need to serve our most valuable resource, which is the students at Tufts," he said. Katzin said that his first conversation with Bacow as TCU President would include the discussion of his opinion of Bacow's appearance on campus. "[Bacow's] communication with students is something I'm not quite satisfied with," Katzin said. "Most students don't know what he does - [they] feel like his main concern is money. It needs to be more transparent." The audience for the debate was composed primarily of current TCU Senators, but the event was also covered live by Tufts University Television (TUTV) as Katzin said he wanted to make it a point to speak directly to viewers "at home."


The Setonian
News

Viewpoint | Why Brazil Matters (to Us)

I should be the last one to ever write this article. Let's face it, as an Argentinian, my feelings toward Brazil can be boiled down to just one word: jealousy. My Latin American neighbor has a larger economy, a smaller debt-to-GDP ratio, a better credit rating, and, even worse, more World Cup trophies! After Kofi Annan released his report recommending changes to the United Nations, it has become likely that Brazil may gain a seat at the Security Council before the end of the decade. In addition, many people try to credit the Brazilians with the invention of the thong (they claim this happened because the world's most beautiful women are in Brazil). I can't argue economics or soccer rankings, but this last allegation is just plain wrong. For all these reasons, and because of my sense of national inferiority, I believe that my words should be taken with added credibility. Trust me when I say that Brazil matters. A lot more happens there than just Carnival. First and foremost, Brazil has about 175 million people. It is, without a doubt, the largest and most important economy in Latin America. According to the World Bank, Brazil's GDP in 2004 was 452.4 billion dollars. In comparison, in Argentina we only achieved a GDP of about 105 billion dollars, and Chile, which has a bit of a "rock star" economy in the region, only reached 41.2 billion dollars. Even Venezuela, with its populist rhetoric, questionable democracy and obscene oil wealth, only managed to pull in about 94 billion dollars. But there is more to the world than just money. Brazil is also developing itself into a regional political leader. As I mentioned above, it seems likely that Brazil will soon be given the opportunity of sitting at the Security Council. There's more. Brazil's rapid response to the coup in Haiti last year (and its willingness to send in troops so that President Bush would not have to) scored the country major points. While greatly advancing its interests, Brazil has managed to remain firmly Latin American. President Lula is on good terms with other leaders of the region. He was present when Tabar?© V??squez was sworn in as the first leftist president of Uruguay in March, and has even been said to be friendly with Cuba. In fact, many believe that if the democratization of the communist island-state is ever to take place, it will be under Brazilian leadership. By now, I think, I have sufficiently proven the case for the first part of my message. But what about the second? Why does Brazil matter to us? The fact of the matter is that Tufts is desperately working to breed the next generation of global leaders. As such, I believe the International Relations program here is nothing short of spectacular. The range of activities and events that take place here on campus meant to deepen our sense of global citizenship and responsibility is tremendous. (Take my word for it, I am the guy who usually makes the Xerox copies of event posters for the Institute for Global Leadership). And yet, despite the many great facets of Tufts University, we have been ignoring Brazil. We have a large number of Latin American students here who could benefit from adjustments in the IR program. In addition, we have many students from the U.S. and elsewhere who have been studying Spanish, Latin American history and International Relations. Consequently, I believe that Tufts has a responsibility to do its best to fulfill its mission. I will say this as clearly as possible: the fact that Portuguese is not taught at this university is embarrassing and dumb. If this school is really trying to create the next wave of global leaders, it should not ignore Brazil any longer. It should be embarrassing to Tufts that it took an Argentinian to say this but it is crucial for the continual advancement of this university that Portuguese be introduced as a language option. The Romance Language department should have done this long ago, and the International Relations department should help as much as possible. It is interesting that the Latin American studies minor suggests Portuguese as one of the language options, though I guess this is intended to further challenge interested students. (Ha, you have to figure out what languages are offered on your own in order to take this minor!) For all the aforementioned reasons, I believe that Portuguese would instantly become a very popular class here at Tufts, probably more so than Swahili or Latin, certainly rivaling German and Russian. In addition, I would also recommend a Portuguese class designed for students with a certain degree of Spanish in their background. An accelerated Portuguese course for people who have completed Spanish 4, for example, could be especially rewarding. For students enrolled in such a course, two or three semesters would often provide them with a working proficiency of the language, benefits that do not exist in the study of Chinese or Arabic for most of us. I realize that the bureaucracy is slow, and that the money is tight. But if it took an Argentinian to admit to this need, then someone really needs to act, and soon.Martin Kielmanowicz is a sophomore majoring in International Relations.


The Setonian
News

Ayn Rand Institute director discusses morality of war

Dr. Yaron Brook, Executive Director of the Ayn Rand Institute, spoke on the morality of war last night in Barnum Hall. "[President George W.] Bush has not taken the actions necessary to defeat terrorism," Brook said in his opening statement. "Instead, he has unnecessarily sacrificed [American] soldiers' lives ... because we hesitated to kill so-called innocents." The current administration "says democratic government in Iraq will lead to a democratic renaissance in the Middle East - until then we must take our shoes off at airports, watch color-coded terrorism alerts ... this is not how the United States used to fight wars," Brook said. He made reference to World War II, when Allied leaders authorized the bombings of German and Japanese cities, including the dropping of atomic bombs over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. "Doing so saved thousands of lives and ultimately ended the war," Brook said. "All Americans today owe their lives to leaders who do whatever it takes to win the war - [those past leaders] were willing to kill anyone. Civilians of enemy nations are part of the [enemy] war machine," he said. Brook said that today's White House is following just-war theory "to the letter" in the way it is waging the war on terrorism. "just-war theory follows the tenet that altruism is the ultimate show of morality and that the sole purpose of using force is to defend," he said. "In effect, this makes true self-defense impossible both in theory and practice ... it makes U.S. soldiers sacrificial animals." According to Brook, the Bush administration's case for the war in Afghanistan and Iraq was justified in terms of both self-defense and the liberation of the Afghani and Iraqi people. "Notice that [Bush] called it Operation Iraqi Freedom, not Operation American Security. There was an emphasis on the altruistic nature of the [use of force], not Saddam Hussein and upholding the United Nations and democracy," he said. Brook said that the main problem with just-war theory is that war is only to be used as a last resort. "Just-war theorists say that to go immediately to war would be selfish and that every other avenue short of military action must be exhausted first." He said that the 243 U.S. Marines killed in Lebanon under the Reagan administration and the first World Trade Center bombing under the Clinton administration are examples of where military action should have been taken but the respective presidents did not see the attacks on the United States as "making it to the last resort." "In the same way, Bush spent one year giving Saddam Hussein last chances," Brook said. He said Syria, Iran and Saudi Arabia are nations that currently pose large threats to the United States, but that Bush will not and is not doing anything because "a man truly dedicated to self-defense cannot justify going to war with them. Iran threatens the United States the most, but we can't attack because there has been no genocide and there is no universally-accepted monster in power there." Brook attacked just-war theory's principles that force used in war must be proportionate to the threat. "In my view this is horrific," he said. "That's saying we must balance the deaths of U.S. soldiers and civilians with the deaths of enemy soldiers and civilians ... and sacrifice the greatest nation in the history of the world to the worst countries today." He also criticized just-war theory's idea that combatants should be distinguished from non-combatants. "Directly targeting civilians is perfectly legitimate," Brook said. "If it's possible to isolate the truly innocent - such as children and freedom fighters - at no military cost, then do so. But insofar as the innocent cannot be isolated ... they should be killed without any moral hesitation." Brook said that if the use of nuclear and chemical weapons was necessary to stop the insurgency, "then it is morally necessary to do so." He argued that ego-rationalism is a better way of fighting the war on terrorism. "This means we go to war whenever, wherever if the rights of our citizens are threatened," he said. But Brook clarified that "it is never right to kill without reason." "However," he said, "treating prisoners of war well doesn't make sense" if it hampers one's own nation's effort. In the same way, electricity, food, and water for a nation's people should not be an occupying force's main concern, Brook said. "The insurgency in Iraq is a result of Bush's failure to truly shock and awe them as opposed to the occupation in Japan where there was no insurgency," he said, in reference to the massive fire and atomic bombing of Japan during World War II. Brook also criticized the Bush administration's goal of spreading democracy. "Our only concern should be to eliminate threat," he said. In the closing remarks of his talk, Brook said, "We are losing a war on Islamic terrorism because we are crippled by altruism and just war theory." Brook's appearance at Tufts was sponsored by the Ayn Rand Interest Club and Lecture Series.


The Setonian
News

Portrait of the Artist

Look up at the walls of Brown and Brew and you may see something familiar: yourself. Senior Jason Krugman, whose art now graces the walls of Tufts' favorite coffee house, often sketches quick gestural drawings of passersby and turns them into portraits like those on display. "I try to incorporate my surroundings as much as possible and blend what I'm thinking with what I'm drawing to make it a cohesive piece," Krugman says of his work. Combining a minor in studio art with a major in economics, Krugman has learned to integrate multiple approaches into his art as well as his studies. He originally focused on drawing, but recently has started to include different media in his work. One piece on the wall of his off-campus apartment features penny rolls, flattened and painted over. His journals, which he works on constantly, look more like creative scrapbooks, combining his own photography and drawings with careful clippings of brochures, tickets and visa forms. They look like something Matisse might have done during the cut-out years if he had collaborated with M. C. Escher, Andy Warhol and graffiti artist Futura 2000. "It's a good exercise in making things fit into each other, seeing what textures go together," Krugman said. In recent years, Krugman's art has turned from "intense, introspective faces" and "psychedelic things" to more commercial forms, but that's not just to make his art more economically lucrative. "It felt isolating to only make really personal works," he said, "because other people don't know what it is when they look at it, and I want other people to want to look at it." Even his newer projects incorporate traces of Krugman's previous work, with abstract forms structured according to facial patterns even when a face is not the obvious subject. This new style characterizes the eight pieces shown in Brown and Brew, which Krugman says are the best pieces he thinks he has done over the past four years. Krugman's art reflects the varied influences in his own life. Fascinated by art since Kindergarten, when he used to draw jet planes, guns and tanks, Krugman was also a three-varsity-sport athlete in high school and played squash for Tufts. He also enjoys fishing, snowboarding and playing guitar. One of the most formative experiences in his artistic career was studying abroad in Barcelona, Spain last year. He spent most of his time there drawing and visiting museums and galleries and even had his own gallery show. "Being in Barcelona was just like art paradise," Krugman said, "because it's probably the best contemporary art scene - or one of the best - in the world. Not only the galleries, but everything: the style, the graffiti, the way the city is, the way the people are. It's so much more open; the whole culture is artistic." Back at Tufts, just a month from graduation, Krugman is completing his work in both of his majors. Though some see art and economics as polar opposites -"Everyone can't believe I do both things," Krugman said - he has found many ways in which they intersect. Krugman has learned how capitalism affects our society and, in turn, art. He cites advertising as one example where art and capitalism intersect, but insists that he won't apply his interests to a career in advertising after college, saying, "I don't want to be prostituted, pretty much." Krugman said the hardest struggle for him lately has been deciding what he wants to pursue after Tufts. He thinks he has a good chance of being able to support himself through art, and he hopes to do so once he has solid financial footing. Currently, he is looking for a job in investment banking or finance. "The last thing I ever want to do is feel sick of making art because I have to make money from it," he said. "I don't think I risk losing my desire to make art even if I'm doing banking. It's just who I am, I've been doing it for so long, and it's just what I love." Krugman acknowledges that investment banking and finance require long hours, but that doesn't worry him. "If it comes down to not having enough time for art and it's driving me crazy," he said, "I'll quit my job." For now, despite his many activities, art still takes up a significant portion of his time. His detailed line drawings take great concentration, and he often stays up late listening to house music and working intensely for hours by himself in his room. "It's pretty much a solitary endeavor," he said. Krugman says it has taken a month to get his bigger works hung in Brown and Brew, having worked with many people on- and off-campus to deal with issues like fire code compliance. Now he will finally show the finished products to the rest of campus. "I'm really excited," he said. "I'm actually not nervous, because I think all the pieces are really good."


The Setonian
News

Men's Track | Tufts is one step closer to championship

On a Patriot's Day weekend that featured Tufts students struggling against asphalt on the streets of Boston, the men's track and field team had its own struggle on Saturday at the George Davis Invitational at UMass-Lowell. This was the second-to-last qualifying meet for the team. Coach Connie Putnam was pleased with how his team performed. "It was a good, solid, developmental meet," he said. "Everyone seemed to make decent progress." In the 3000 meter steeplechase, sophomore Josh Kennedy ran well, securing a qualifying time for the Div. III New England championship meet in a time of 9:32.54. The mark was a nine-second improvement from last week. If Kennedy can continue to improve, he will be on track to provisionally qualifying for Nationals. In the 400 meter dash, senior Ray Carre ran a time of 50.54 seconds, a New England Championships qualifying time. Putnam called the time "very impressive." During the 110 meter hurdles race, sophomore Jamil Ludd ran a solid time of 15.57, despite interference from the runner in the next lane. Ludd was running side by side with a tall runner in the next lane, and at each hurdle the other runner would flank his arm out wide and tap Ludd in the air. "It threw off my steps. I felt like I ran a worse race than I actually did," Ludd said. He added that running such a solid time despite the interference says a lot about his conditioning. Ludd's next goal is to qualify for the National meet. "I'm feeling great about next week," he said. "One of these weeks, we're all going to break out. Every time I'm on the track, I say to myself 'Just get faster.'" In the throwing events, Tufts had some solid efforts to propel some athletes into championship meets. In the javelin throw event, sophomore Ryan Byrne qualified for the Div. III New England championship meet with a mark of 166 feet, nine inches. Byrne also had a good day at the shot put event, qualifying for New Englands with a 44 feet, 10.5 inches mark. In the jump events, sophomore Fred Jones continued his dominance, placing first in both the triple and long jump, besting his jumps from the previous week in both instances. Jones has now provisionally qualified for Nationals in both events. In the 4 x 100 meter relays, the lead Tufts team ran together for the first time, and finished well despite a botched relay of the baton. The squad finished in fifth place even though it was Carre's first time competing in the event due to an injury to freshman Marcus Boggis. "If we start getting exchanges, things should come together nicely," Putnam said. Ludd said that next week the team should return to the normal relay squad, including Boggis. The past two weeks, Tufts has had issues with the handoff of the baton in both races. This week Tufts shifts its focus to its upcoming meet at the Dartmouth Invitational, where the Jumbos will make a last attempt to secure NESCAC qualifying times before moving on to the NESCAC championship meet in Springfield, Mass. This week the coaching staff will sit down and figure out where to place their athletes to maximize the qualifying potential for the upcoming meet. At the NESCAC meet in two weeks, Putnam expects his athletes to come out hard and strong, due to the added stakes. "You're adding the element of emotion to good conditioning," he said. With one more qualifying meet left before the championship leg of the season begins, Putnam is happy with the progress of his team. "Things are going very well right now," he said.


The Setonian
News

Police Briefs

Audio equipment stolen from Crane Room Last Thursday at 8:59 a.m., a member of Tufts Lighting Sound and Video reported that a piece of equipment used at a University event was stolen from the Crane Room sometime during the previous night. Members of the Tufts University Police Department (TUPD) reported to the room and spoke with the student who informed them that an audio mixer had been taken from the room sometime between 11:30 p.m. the previous night and the following morning. TUPD officers conducted a search around the immediate area but could not locate the mixer. The case is still under investigation. Loud noise complaint in Latin Way Loud music and screaming females prompted several students in the Latin Way apartment complex to report a noise violation to the TUPD last Friday at 4:33 a.m. Upon arriving at the scene, members of the Tufts University Police Department (TUPD) knocked on the door several times but received no response. Finally, the resident opened the door and the officers said they noticed six or seven individuals sitting in the common area. Police asked all the non-residents to leave the premises and the residents were properly identified. The authorities advised the residents that they broke the University's noise policy and that a report would be filed with the Dean of Students' office. According to TUPD Sergeant Richard McConaghy, students must be aware of their building's quiet hours. "At certain times of the night and morning, students should turn down their music and abide by the quiet hours," McConaghy said. University property damaged in Stratton Hall At approximately 1:30 a.m. on Saturday morning, the TUPD received a call reporting a disturbance in one of the male restrooms in Stratton Hall. As the reporting officers approached the building, they noticed two students sitting outside. After viewing certain damages and talking with residents of the hall, the authorities concluded that the students sitting outside upon the officers' arrival were involved. TUPD officers spoke with both individuals and brought them to the TUPD office for further questioning. According to the report, at least one of the individuals admitted to creating a disturbance and causing destruction to the restroom. The student reportedly inflicted damage to bathroom stall doors and soap dispensers in the restroom. Pictures were taken of the destroyed property and a report was filed with the Dean of Students' office. Sergeant McConagy said he would like to warn students that destroying University property comes at the expense of the students involved. "Those who destroy University property must be prepared to pay restitution and suffer the full consequences of their actions," McConaghy said.-- compiled by Mark Pesavento


The Setonian
News

Baseball | Jumbos chalk up sixth consecutive victory

The baseball team is currently ranked first in the NESCAC East, and with the Jumbos' performance yesterday, it's easy to see why. After sweeping NESCAC rival Bowdoin this weekend, Tufts had no problem in a non-league match-up against UMass Dartmouth yesterday. The 9-2 victory was the Jumbos' sixth consecutive win, and the team is now 16-6 overall with a perfect 5-0 NESCAC East record. Tufts scored nine runs on 10 hits and held the Corsairs to two runs on nine hits, dropping UMass Dartmouth's record to 9-17. Senior DH Greg Hickey led a solid Jumbo offense, going 3 for 4 with two two-run home runs. Hickey started off the momentum in the first, bashing one over the fence to drive in sophomore first baseman Bryan McDavitt, who had walked. The Corsairs countered in the second, scoring one unearned run, but Tufts answered the challenge in the fourth inning. The Jumbos tacked on two more runs, both unearned, when sophomore centerfielder Chris Decembrele scored on a UMD error and senior Jeff Volinski, who had walked, also scored. Decembrele had a good day overall, going 2 for 4. UMass managed one more run in the fifth to make the score 4-2. Tufts widened the gap in the bottom half of the fifth, scoring two more runs on another home run by Hickey. Hickey drove in McDavitt again, who had singled. The home run was Hickey's fifth for the season, and the senior also drove another run in the seventh with an RBI single. McDavitt continued his offensive hot streak, finishing the game 3 for 4 with two triples. Prior to Tuesday's game, he had a .405 BA for 74 at bats and Hickey had a .411 BA in 73 at bats. The pair now lead the Jumbos with 33 hits each. Hickey and McDavitt's offensive contributions to the Jumbos have not gone unnoticed. Two weeks ago, McDavitt was named NESCAC Player of the Week, and this week Hickey earned the same honors. "I had a good week last week," Hickey said. "I'm seeing the ball better, I'm more patient. I'm just in a groove right now and it's working out for me the past few weeks." Coach John Casey used the non-league game as an opportunity to pitch seven pitchers, almost the entire staff. Sophomore Carlos Lopez started the game for the Jumbos and earned his first W, pitching only two innings in which he allowed two hits and no earned runs. Freshmen Brian Dzialo and Adam Telian each gave a scoreless inning of relief, their classmate Jason Protano gave up one run in the fifth, and junior Erik Johanson allowed no hits in the sixth. Senior Jeremy Davis pitched two hitless innings and sophomore Aaron Narva finished the game giving up only one hit in the ninth. Freshman Corsair Brian O'Connell picked up the loss for UMD, allowing four earned runs on six hits in five innings. Casey was pleased with his team's performance. Considering the Jumbos have won 13 of their past 14 games, are undefeated in the NESCAC, and had a staff ERA of 2.52 prior to Tuesday's game, there's not much to complain about. "We pitched our whole staff again," Casey said. "And we played pretty well defensively. Hickey and McDavitt had big games offensively for us." When asked if the team, despite its success thus far, has any areas that need improvement, Casey referred to the upcoming games. "We'll find out what happens this weekend," he said. The next two weekends will take the Jumbos on the road for six consecutive NESCAC East Games. The Jumbos' first five league games all occurred at home, and they'll face their toughest challenge yet against rival Trinity, who is right behind Tufts with a 21-4 overall, 8-1 NESCAC record. The outcome of the games will determine if Tufts can hold its lead in the league. "We're going to Trinity during a hot streak," Hickey said. "We're pitching very well and hitting the ball better, so hopefully we can keep it up. They're a very good team. May the best team win."


The Setonian
News

Wind power vote moved

Due to miscommunication and technological problems, Tufts students will not be able to vote on the Environmental Consciousness Outreach (ECO)'s initiative to transfer a portion of the University's energy to wind power in today's online ballot. Students would have had the option of voting for or against the wind power initiative in addition to voting for either current TCU Vice President junior Rafi Goldberg or imcumbent TCU Treasurer junior Jeff Katzin. Current TCU President Dave Baumwoll said he accepted responsibility for the mishap, and said there was a serious miscommunication with regard to how the referendum would be included on the ballot technologically. "We had some [information technology] problems regarding the time necessary for the referendum to be included with the other items on the ballot," Baumwoll said. In an e-mail, ECO Chair senior Jennifer Baldwin said, "The [referendum] could not be on the online ballot because ... those who set up the online vote didn't have enough time to set up and test a referendum." Instead of including the referendum on today's ballot, Baumwoll said that the referendum would be sent out, via a campus-wide e-mail, to be voted on in one week from today. According to Baldwin, wind power is considered a clean energy source because it is renewable and does not add harmful toxins to the air when burned like fossil fuels like coal or oil. The problem with wind power, however, is that it is expensive to produce. Using wind power to fuel Tufts would cost more than using fossil fuels, resulting in a $10 tuition increase per Tufts student. Next Wednesday's vote will determine whether Tufts will raise tuition to fund wind power as an alternative energy.- by Brian McPartland


The Setonian
News

Marissa Beck | Eat this!

Harvard decided to get rid of brand-name cereals from its dining halls this year. It's not a good idea to take food away from a peaceful child: he or she always cries in the end. Apparently, there are some things that even college students can't give up. Who would have thought it would be Frosted Flakes and Lucky Charms? The older you get, the harder it is to break away from old habits. Too bad their administration didn't figure this out before the gory cereal demonstrations, a.k.a. cereal scattered along the floor of a dining hall. What did they expect? They messed with Harvard students' Fruit Loops. Now they are paying for it. Or not. One of the reasons Harvard tossed the brand names to begin with was the rising costs of major cereal companies' products. Besides being more economical, the administration's claim was also that non-brand names were healthier. But not when "Tootie Fruities" and "Colossal Crunch" ("wannabe" Fruit Loops and Cap'n Crunch) were their answer. These breakfast cereals still aren't as nutritious as those high in fiber and low in sugar. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved a number of claims relating fiber intake to a lowered risk of heart disease and cancer. That's enough reason to toss away Fruit Loops, "Tootie Fruities," or any other cereal whose contents look as though they've been colored in with crayons. The real question amid this Harvard cereal scandal (aside from why the administration would possibly cut the cereal budget, of all things) is whether or not students should have to adjust their eating habits. According to a Harvard senior, "They replaced all of the familiar cereals with ones that have weird names and don't taste good." Something tells me Grape-Nuts and All-Bran weren't the "familiar cereals" this student meant. Well, what a shame it is that Harvard kids can't enjoy our Kellogg's Cracklin' Oat Bran and General Mills' Cheerios, both excellent sources of fiber (although sorry to burst your bubble, the Cracklin' Oat Bran is high in calories with 17 grams of sugar). But as we Tufts students know, our breakfast options are not limited to cereal. We have eggs, cottage cheese, sliced grapefruit, assorted fruits like strawberries, kiwis, grapes and cantaloupe - even the waffles and pancakes here are probably better for you than "Tootie Fruities." Unfortunately for Harvard kids, lunch and dinners are now screwed up, too. One Harvard student admitted to eating Lucky Charms for all three of her meals - not unlike many college students in any institution. But now with the new changes, she has had to stop eating cereal. What a travesty. The problem isn't the Lucky Charms embargo. It's the lack of good, wholesome food in college students' diets. But that wasn't the case when I visited another school. I had the opportunity to talk about the importance of fitness and nutrition to fourth-grade kids at the Brooks School in Medford last week. It was hard to believe how much these 10-year-olds knew about nutrition. We went around in a circle and told each other our breakfasts that morning. First off - everyone had eaten breakfast. These kids already had the right idea. The American Dietetic Association (ADA) asserts that breakfast improves concentration, memory, mood and healthy eating habits throughout the day. Secondly, all of the kids had at least one piece of fruit, a glass of milk, and some type of whole grain - which protects against cancer, cardiovascular disease, diabetes and obesity because it's high in fiber and antioxidants. "I ate oatmeal; I had cheerios and a banana; I ate rye bread with organic peanut butter," the kids sounded off. And I'm not lying about that organic peanut butter part. Fourth grade food IQ was tremendous. Harvard students might wish to get some ideas from the kids at the Brooks School. Whole grains. There's a start. The Brooks kids like the taste of it. And if a kid thinks it's good - then it's good! I didn't even know there was a food guide pyramid at that age, much less what whole grains were. I probably thought Entenmann's was its own food group, along with Yodels, Dunkaroos, and all of the other foods with their innocuous names. FUN fruits, fruit snacks, fruit roll-ups, and Nerds- you remember these, just as much as you remember Cookie Monster pre-health freak. Bubble Tape, ring pops, pop tarts - what nostalgia we still own for our favorite old school snacks, much like Harvard's precious Cocoa Puffs. I understand that it is difficult to switch our mindsets and our taste buds at this age, just as it is difficult now to pick up a second or third language. But that's not to say it's impossible. Crazier things than not being able to eat Fruit Loops every morning have happened. One day you'll wake up to an ecstatic Oscar the Grouch and Cookie-turned-Carrot Monster. Then it'll all be over.Senior Marissa Beck, an English and art history major, works with the Strong Women program as an assistant manager and personal trainer for the Tufts Personalized Performance Program. She can be reached at Marissa.Beck@tufts.edu. This column is written in conjunction with Emily Bergeron, R.D., the editor of the Daily's Balance section.


The Setonian
News

BC students organize strike for 'equality'

Student support for the inclusion of "sexual orientation" in Boston College's (BC) nondiscrimination policy reached a boiling point this past Friday, April 15 with a campus strike and rally. Friday's strike and rally intended to show the school's administration that a large portion of the faculty and student body support changing the nondiscrimination policy to protect lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people equally. According to BC senior and event organizer Brenna Casey, "well over 1,000 students and faculty members" were present at the noon-time rally in a show of support for the policy change. Bearing blue signs reading "End discrimination," faculty and students marched around BC's campus. Students and professors also spoke about the benefits of including "sexual orientation" in the nondiscrimination policy, including the creation of a more welcoming place for first-rate students and faculty members who may otherwise be deterred from coming to BC as a result of the current nondiscrimination policy. According to BC sophomore and student organizer Nick Salter, "dozens of classes were canceled [on Friday], or at least professors excused students to go attend the rally." Friday's events were a "demonstration of just how big this movement has become on campus ... it's something a lot of students and faculty are behind [in]," Casey said. "The most important thing is that it was hugely successful," Salter said. "It exceeded our expectations by far." Currently, the BC nondiscrimination policy lists "equal opportunity without regard to sexual orientation" in a separate clause from "race, sex, age, national and ethnic origin, religion, disabilities, marital or parental status, veteran status or personal history." For approximately three years, a group of BC students have been meeting with the BC administration, petitioning and garnering support for a change in the current policy that would include sexual orientation within the main nondiscrimination clause. But BC President Father William Leahy, the ultimate authority as to whether the policy will reflect the change, has to date remained relatively opposed to the idea. Student organizers for Friday's event, however, are optimistic that the climate for change is reaching new possibilities. Salter, who is one of five students who were able to meet with the administration with regard to changing the nondiscrimination policy, said that he and the other four students are looking forward to continuing their negotiations with the administration, with a meeting between Salter and the other students and the administration to be held today. "We're hoping for a positive outcome ... as early as this week," Salter said. In a April 16 Boston Globe article, BC spokesperson Jack Dunn said that students have "rightfully pointed out that our policy is not welcoming enough ... and we're meeting with them to try and change that without giving up our rights." According to Dunn, some people within the BC administration fear that "[including] sexual orientation [in the nondiscrimination policy] could mean that outside authorities, namely the courts, could require BC to approve and fund activities that are in conflict with the [Jesuit] values that sustain us." For Salter, the highlight of Friday's strike and rally was the inclusion it provided for all students and faculty interested in changing the school's nondiscrimination policy. "Only five of us can join the administration at the negotiating table," Salter said. "Friday's events provided an opportunity for hundreds of others who care about the issue to participate too."


The Setonian
News

VII brings worldly photographers to Tufts

At the first ever workshop by the renowned VII photo agency, the agency's photographers offered two days' worth of presentations sponsored by the University's Institute for Global Leadership (IGL) and Canon. The workshop allowed the photographers to display their work and discuss issues in photography and photojournalism. "An important component of what we do is education, which is implicit in journalism itself," said TIME Magazine and VII photographer James Natchwey. Nachtwey and the eight other photographers in the agency are regarded as some of the most talented photographers in the world. In addition to presentations of their individual works, all VII members sat on a panel discussion entitled "Is anyone out there Listening? The Relevance of Photojournalism Today." "This job has never been [easy]," Nachtwey said. "It was really tough then and it's really tough now." "There's a certain pessimism around photojournalism," VII photographer Lauren Greenfield said. "We're not in a time where you work for one magazine and that funds all your work, we're not in a time in America where people work for one company for the whole life anymore." Evolution in photojournalism and photography has required photographers to change as well. According to VII photographer Gary Knight, the Internet and the VII group's publishing capacity allows for more freedom. "As a group, we've been very prolific in publishing books," Knight said. "We have a Web site with a lot of topics - we've been more in control of what we're all seeing in the last three years than ever before." Digital photography has taken a lot of the expense out of photography, VII photographer John Stanmeyer said. "The options are limitless, you can just take photography and then just use it," he said. "It's a hammer a nail, you can hammer it and hammer it and hammer it ... you can work it and work it and it doesn't cost you $16 a roll [for printing and developing]." The photographers also discussed the difficulty of portraying the suffering of fellow humans. "As a creative individual and a communicator, we try to be as creative as we can in various areas," VII photographer Ron Haviv said. "There's a criticism that works we do with people's tragedies shouldn't be considered as works of art. I don't think that's necessarily true - agenda of venue isn't established by critics, it's established by viewers." Fellow VII photographer Christopher Morris agreed. "We're not there to make people happy with our work, especially if it's in the Sudan or Somalia," he said. "You want to make people learn. [There are] pictures I've taken that I know will never be published. I want people to be shocked about war." Nachtwey, who specializes in war photography, said that there are times where he stepped out of his role of photographer. "I have helped people out of riots. I have carried people to food-centers. However, when other people are helping that is when I do my job as a photographer." "I only film places that I think have hope. I believe that the free-flow of information is critical. That is the valuable role," Nachtwey said. The panels offered inspirational and technical advice to camera-toting crowd members from all over the country who packed into Cabot Auditorium. "Style is important, you must define the voice and your own message," VII photographer Antonin Kratochvil said. "Use your internal fire," Stanmeyer said. "Don't be pessimistic. I don't think anything is dead in this business, it's an enormous opportunity." Tufts has had a longstanding relationship with the VII photographers. In 2004, Natchwey was given the University's Jean Mayer Global Citizenship Award, and presented ReThink: Causes and Consequences of Sept. 11, Envoys of War, and Evidence: The Case Against Milosevic. Out of the collaboration between the IGL and Nachtwey emerged Exposure, a program between the VII photographers and the IGL. Now in its second year, Exposure displays photography both from students and VII photographers, as well as funding for photography-related student research.- Kat Schmidt and William Bendetson contributed to this article


The Setonian
News

Loi To | The Social Entrepeneur

And the winning numbers are ... 16, 18 and 21. Adolescents dream of these three magic numbers. Sixteen is the age when teens can finally start becoming "adults" and handle heavy machinery all on their own, no more carpooling, no more catching the bus. It's time for most 16-year olds to drive in their new hand-me-down Toyota Camry. Twenty-one is the lucky number for most college juniors, when hiding the booze from your freshmen year RA or obtaining a fake ID from your cousin's, cousin's friend are all but distant memories. Bar hoping and over 21 club hoping is the norm. But 18 is the dud age for many. The only things 18-year olds show for being a year older are cigarettes, porno magazines and lottery tickets. My 18th birthday is when my fascination with scratch lottery tickets began. I remember being in the convenience store that day where a boy from Hartford, Conn. became a "man." I stepped up to the counter relishing in the fact that I could by a lottery ticket on my own. Although I was a manly 18 year-older that could now buy lottery tickets, I would still be the poor college student the next year so I bought the cheapest ticket there was - the one-dollar "Aces High" game. The game was simple enough: if my scratched number beat the dealers, I'd win a prize, the magic Ace would win me an additional prize. I scratched the ticket with the quarter I had left in my pocket, and to my amazement I had scratched off the magical Ace of Spades. I had just won $20. From that moment on I was hooked to scratch lottery tickets. When I was in a gas station or convenience store that had lottery tickets in stock and I had a couple of extra dollars in my pocket I would try my luck, never really recapturing my first and only brush with luck and the lottery that day I turned 18. Now as I am approaching my 21st birthday and, writing this column, I have started to think about lottery tickets once again. As ultra-liberal sounding as this may sound from a right-leaning moderate, I believe state sponsored lotteries are an additional tax on the poor and uneducated. According to a Texas Lottery Commission study of Texas lottery players, people with a college degree spend three times less on lottery tickets then people with a high school diploma. What's more telling is that people with incomes less than $20,000 dollars a year spend almost two times as much on the lottery as people that make $50,000- $59,000 a year. As this and many studies on the lottery have shown people that are less educated and are poorer spend more money on the lottery. So what or what's wrong with this, you might ask? The problem with this is the lottery is a form of regressive tax, which means that poorer people are taxed at a higher rate. In 2003, state governments kept and redistributed almost $14 billion in lottery revenue. Yes, the lottery revenue goes to fund education, fire departments, and local expenses, but the "tax" is wrong because it distributes an extra tax burden on the poor and less educated. Not only are poorer and less educated people spending more on the lottery, these people spend a higher proportion of their income on the lottery than the rich and educated. State governments should not make it their business to publicize, sell and run lotteries that put an extra burden on the poor and less educated that often times are minorities from inner cities. Lotteries are unsound tax policy that should be re-evaluated. Although tax revenue brings in billions of dollars for states, to supplement local budgets, lotteries are a way in which governments unfairly place the tax burden. In Connecticut, the lottery's slogan is "You can't win, if you don't play." But a more apt motto should be, "If you play, only the rich win." Perhaps turning 18 is an even greater downer than I thought before; cigarettes give you lung cancer, buying pornography makes you look like a dirty old man, and the lottery has its pitfalls full of inequitable taxes on the poor.Loi To is a junior majoring in political science and Russian. He can be reached at loi.to@tufts.edu.


The Setonian
News

Theater Review | American Rep welcomes you to prison

The organizers of the American Repertory Theatre are worthy of admiration for their willingness to support modern and experimental projects in theater. However, with ART's production of "Olly's Prison," the Theatre took their enterprising spirit for original or daring pieces to an unfortunate new level. By the time intermission rolled around, a third of the audience had left the show, and the remaining members greeted the cast's final bows with hard expressions and perfunctory applause. Playwright Edward Bond's work is not commonly performed in the U.S., nor in his home country of England, for that matter. His often politically-charged and violence-ridden plays have the clear aim of shocking people into action in an attempt to achieve some form of social justice. However, the end result in this production is a sense of confusion. The opening monologue is one of the stronger scenes in the play largely due to the impressive skills of leading actor Bill Camp, who has appeared in an array of roles at the ART, on Broadway, and in film and television. Camp captures the slow deterioration of Mike, a working-class, widowed father, as he attempts to make his daughter Sheila appreciates the comfortable home that he believes he provides for her. Sheila, played by Zofia Goszczynska, sits stubbornly and silently at a table, refusing to acknowledge Mike's presence. It becomes clear that the apartment, for both Sheila and Mike, resembles a kind of prison. As the scene progresses, Mike's anger and confusion cause him to commit an act of aggression toward his daughter that lands him in a literal prison. From here, the play begins a downward slope - or more of a slow drift - towards a disappointing end. A series of secondary characters, none of whom make any lasting impressions, weave in and out of the storyline. The much built-up scene of violence near the play's end, which brings the underlying themes of society's excessive violence and corruption to a head, is not only between two of the more uninteresting characters, but it also drags on and on. During Mike's time in jail, he interacts with two inmates: Barry (Thomas Derrah), an old man who will do anything for a smoke, and Smiler (Peter Richards), an upbeat young man who ends up committing suicide a few days before he is to be released. Set design and production provide the stage with a dark, drab tone which succeeds in bringing some of the stronger scenes to life. The interior of the apartment is quite natural and not overly elaborate, with suggestive bars of light entering through a window and the sound of traffic in the distance. Inside the prison, the same film noir sort of lighting, combined with prison gates and cigarette smoke, is perhaps overly interactive, as the audience at times feels just as trapped as Mike himself. Occasional moments of comic relief are provided by Angela Reed, who plays Mike's desperate and pathetic lover, Vera. When Mike tells her that he is in prison for life, Vera responds: "That's only their way of putting it," and continues to remain faithful to Mike, who doesn't show any genuine feelings for her. Reed's performance is convincing and interesting, but she is given less stage time than the mediocre actors, including David Wilson Barnes as Frank, a policeman and former boyfriend of Sophia, and Micket Solis as Olly, who is introduced in the last third of the play. "Olly's Prison," was written by Bond as a teleplay for the BBC in 1993. ART's production is the play's American premiere, and Edward Bond made the conscious decision to leave the play unaltered for American audiences. Though the play starts off strong, it soon collapses under the weight of the playwright's lofty and unrealized aims, and the mediocre secondary characters do nothing to enliven the dreary imbroglio that is "Olly's Prison."


The Setonian
News

By the Numbers | Still dying too young?

On Sunday, the World Bank released a report evaluating progress made towards the Millennium Development Goals, a set of objectives to be achieved by 2015. The Goals, which were agreed upon five years ago by world leaders, include decreasing child mortality rates, increasing enrollment in primary schools, bettering health care, and making education more accessible to larger numbers of girls. According to the World Bank report, though, there's still a ways to go before those objectives are achieved -- especially where child mortality is concerned.