Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Tufts co-hosts largest collegiate cycling event in nation

To a casual observer, Professor's Row probably sounded like a huge block party on Saturday. Speakers churned out everything from Rapper's Delight to the Offspring, which was mixed with sounds of people shouting and cheering. A variety of tents were set up on Fletcher Field, and crowds of people line the street. But if that casual observer were to have stepped into the street, he would have received a rude awakening when a pack of brightly-uniformed cyclists tore through the corner by ATO, as they competed in this weekend's third annual Boston Beanpot Classic. The event was co-coordinated by five area schools -- Tufts, Harvard, Boston University, Northeastern, and Wentworth. It consisted of a team time trial on Saturday morning hosted by BU in Concord, the Tufts' Criterium (crit) on Saturday afternoon, (which was preceded Saturday morning by a non-collegiate crit race), and a Harvard-hosted road race at the Tufts Vet School in Grafton. Despite cold, rainy, and at times dangerous conditions, the weekend's events went off without any major problems. The turnout was so great that a press release yesterday on the Eastern Collegiate Cycling Conference (ECCC) website called the Beanpot, "the largest collegiate cycling race in America." Three hundred nine riders participated, up from the 250 riders last year. "The event was a huge success," said sophomore James Gronek, who co- coordinated the event with senior captain Carolyn Whitten. "There were a record number of riders who participated; [it was] the largest race since the early 90s excluding Nationals." Gronek spent most of the Saturday's crit race riding in the lap car, and, at one point, Whitten had to run off to divert a crisis, as someone informed her over a radio that a bus was trying to enter the course. Other members from the Tufts Cycling Club were stationed around the course, keeping pedestrians out of the way. In between organizing and policing, the Jumbos also cycled. Overall for the weekend, out of 34 teams that scored points, Tufts earned a 20th place tie with UConn, scoring 29 points altogether. This was not a bad showing for the team, considering it was faced with competition from schools where cycling is considered an official Division I sport, and therefore funded as such. All of the races were broken into classes, four for the men and two for the women. Tufts only had racers in the B division for women and the D division for men, but the Jumbos competed well in each case. Being a smaller group, the team usually sets its goals at scoring points in a competition, rather than dominating the track. "As a team, all we want to do is score points," sophomore Olivia Jaras said. "If we are scoring points, we are in good shape." Jaras, as well as three others, competed in the team time trial Saturday morning, where Tufts earned a ninth place finish. The Jumbos also earned a sixth place finish by the men in the D division. A crit race is a test of technique, as its sharp turns and quick laps require a lot of maneuvering. The Tufts' course, known to be one of the more difficult courses in New England, followed a path that began in front of health services, with a left onto Curtis and another quick left onto Sawyer, through Packard and past Hodgedon, a quick uphill climb past the campus center and back onto Professors Row to complete the loop. A few male cyclists from the University of New Hampshire (UNH), who had competed earlier in the day, remarked at how difficult the course was, as they looked on from their vantage point at turn three. "This is a really technical course," UNH cyclist Blake Holt said. "That second turn is really scary, and the second uphill can also get you." This, combined with the racing conditions made for many crashes that occurred throughout the day. TEMS was kept busy tending to scrapes and burns known to cyclists as "road rash." At least five cyclists had to be taken to the hospital by ambulance. The most exciting race of the day was the men's A competition, which included some of the top riders in the country, a few of whom have sponsors and are paid to ride. The race became a battle between riders from Dartmouth and the University of Vermont (UVM). In an excellent display of teamwork, three riders from UVM held back the rest of the pack, while their teammate Keith Jennings managed to sneak ahead. He was in the company of Tim Clement of Dartmouth for a period of time until he managed to break away towards the end to win the race by almost a lap. Jumbo senior Matt Dysart took tenth place in the men's D division, while freshman Abe Gissen took fourteenth. Jaras took ninth in the women's B division. Aside from racing, Saturday provided an opportunity for Tufts' riders to have their friends see what cycling is all about. "It was great to get support from the Tufts Community," Dysart said. "A lot of alumni were here, and it was really nice how it all came together." At Sunday's road race in Grafton, the Jumbos failed to score points. Senior Anna Kaltenboeck placed highest (25th out of 43) for Tufts in the women's B race that was 26 miles long. In the men's D race, Dysart finished 28th, while sophomore Winston Chang finished 40th out of 75 starters.


The Setonian
News

Can you Kiniwe?

Infectious rhythms, intricate dance patterns, and camaraderie characterized Tufts' first Intercollegiate Festival of African Music and Dance last Saturday. The public workshop, held on Saturday afternoon, was hosted by Professor David Locke and his students, who make up the Kiniwe dance troop. Groups from Wellesley and MIT also participated. It brought together area students, allowing them to share their experience with African culture through song, drumming, and dance. In addition to the workshop, the groups performed at the campus center during the cultural festival. The festival culminated in an evening performance at Cohen Auditorium. "The whole event was a learning experience that showed the different parts of the African Diaspora," freshman Kiniwe dancer Adwoa Twum said. "It bridged cultural gaps." Each student group held a tutorial to share their knowledge of a particular dance with others. Locke and master drummer Dolsi-naa Abubakari Lunna hosted the event and presented a Dagomba dance from Ghana. They also demonstrated the Tora, a dance characterized by bumping buttocks. Kera Washington, the director of Wellesley's Yanvalou troupe, showed the Vodun dance from Haiti, which was accompanied by the Yanvalou's drummers and lead dancer Moira Pulitzer-Kennedy. Lamine Tour‚, the co-founder and co-director of MIT's Rambax, led the groups in Sabar, a dance and drum tradition from Senegal. The founder and director of Kiniwe since 1979, Locke noted that the study of African dance is becoming increasingly popular among students. "The idea was to have students at different colleges and universities around Boston realize that they are not alone, and partly to demonstrate that African music and dance is part of the legitimate curriculum of study," he said. The Kiniwe performance group is composed of students from two of Locke's classes. The students in these classes, which are listed as "African Music Ensemble" and "African Dance," participate in an active learning process which teaches them several traditional West African dances and drumming. Students learn about the cultural importance of each dance. Wellesley's West African drum and dance ensemble, Yanvalou has a similar mission. Co-President Moira Pulitzer-Kennedy, a senior and dancer for the troupe, said that Yanvalou focuses on the African Diaspora as it exists in Haiti and Brazil, and the dance is portrayed in a folkloric context rather than a religious one. Yanvalou is the name of a rhythm, dance, and song. "It is a very spiritual rhythm," Pulitzer-Kennedy said, while wearing the traditional all-white dress of the dance. "We are not doing it in the religious context but it does have significance. It incorporates reverence for the earth and the spirit realm." Students from Tufts and other colleges participated in the open workshop held on Saturday afternoon. Marco Brun del Re, a student from The Berklee School of Music, saw a flyer for the event and decided to visit campus to participate in it. He remarked, "As far as African music goes, I find it to be very spiritual, and it taps into something within you." Kaplan, a co-president of Yanvalou and a drummer in the troupe, expressed her enthusiasm for the event, observing that culture shows combine many different cultures which are often unrelated. "It's exciting to perform with other college African dance groups," she said.


The Setonian
News

Education Briefs

Busta Rhymes tentatively scheduled to play at Harvard Busta Rhymes will headline Harvard University's annual Springfest, on April 23. According to the Harvard Crimson, Harvard is scheduled to spend $40,000 for the Busta Rhymes concert, which is $10,000 less than what Tufts paid him to come to last year's Spring Fling. Due to inclement weather the concert was cancelled, although Tufts still had to pay the performer in full as a result of uninsured contract commitments. The contract between Busta Rhymes and Harvard has not yet been finalized. Associate Dean of the College Judith Kidd was on vacation last week and was unable to complete the deal. "I'm pretty confident that the administration is on board with this," Mahan said in the Crimson article. "Springfest has moved away from its focus on the undergraduate committee and this is a way to bring the focus back to undergraduates." Maryland students target their governor through documentary Thanks to University of Maryland Student Body President Tim Daly and his film crew, Maryland Governor Robert Ehrlich has been receiving some negative publicity recently. Daly raised $8,000 in donations to create a documentary called "Bob & Me." The film mimics Oscar-winner Michael Moore's 1989 "Roger & Me," where Moore attempted to confront former General Motors Chairman Roger Smith about laying off 33,000 auto workers in Flint, Mich. Daly was unable to approach his target, but the film focuses on Ehrlich's decision to increase tuition 54 percent in the last four years for Maryland's public universities. An additional increase averaging 9.4 percent has already been approved for next fall. Daly and his producers hope the movie will inspire lawmakers to pass legislation that caps future tuition increases. Ehrlich's office claims he was never contacted by Daly. Compiled by Patrick Gordon from The Harvard Crimson, CNN.com and the New York Times.


The Setonian
News

The new paper-writing plan

"Hard work is for people short on talent." This statement appears in "Brain Droppings" by the great George Carlin. Which brings me to this week's column subject: It's getting to be that time of year when we liberal arts students realize that we're going to have to actually do some work. That's right -- it's time for final papers. Usually these papers range from 10 to 20 pages. Anyone who has written a final paper has encountered this dilemma: You've written your paper. It's quality work. But you've completely run out of things to write about and you need to fill up seven more pages. That's why I'm here to show you the way -- the paper-writing technique that the professors at Tufts don't want you to know. It begins with this simple fact: 90 percent of your paper grade rests in your introduction and conclusion. You need a good thesis. It has to be original. The more outlandish, the better. If you want to theorize that Hamlet didn't actually want to murder anyone but was pressured into it by society and family duty, you're in trouble. Because that has been written about a thousand times by people a lot more talented than you. But if you want to theorize that Hamlet was incestuous and gay and was actually in love with his dead father, then you've got something. Another trick you need to use is to start and end your paper with a bang. You need shock value. The professors at Tufts have read so many papers that they all eventually become a big blur. The first and last sentences of your paper need to either be a quote or a question. Also, your conclusion needs to have a twist. Think of it like a movie. Would "The Usual Suspects" have been a good movie if it didn't have that surprise ending? Probably. But that's beside the point. If your thesis is that Hamlet is incestuous and gay then, in your conclusion, you need to go even farther. Say that Hamlet's conversation with his father's ghost is actually Hamlet masturbating while imagining his father. Of course that's not true. But who cares? At least it's interesting. Once you've got your introduction and conclusion written, the hard part is over. All you have left is the body. This is what gives most people trouble. This is where you need to fill in a lot of words to get to the mandatory number of pages. Think of it this way: This column is supposed to be 900 words. This word is going to be the four hundred and fortieth word in the column: Diarrhea. So I'm about halfway done. I've identified the middle paragraph of my paper. You should do the same. Now think of your paper as a bell curve. The middle paragraph is the apex. All you have to do now is take the paragraph preceding it and rephrase it after the middle paragraph. Then rewrite the paragraph before that one in other words. Keep going until you get your paper to the right length. Eventually, your paper should look something like this: INTRO - A - B - C - D - MIDDLE PARAGRAPH - D - C - B - A - CONCLUSION. And don't worry. Your professor won't figure it out. Professors don't read the bodies of papers. They have better things to do. Even if your professor does read the body, he or she won't notice your copying technique. And even if your professor figures it out, who cares? As long as the stuff you're repeating is quality stuff, it's all good. A technique you should also employ is beginning and concluding your essay with something shocking. The element of surprise is very useful. Professors read many papers and they tend to sound alike after a while. A quote or a question is a good way to begin and end your paper. Also, your paper should end with a twist. Something that takes your thesis into even deeper depths of wackiness. Remember - as long as your paper is interesting, it will get a good grade. Ten percent of your paper grade comes from the body. A great thesis is much more important. Your thesis needs to be creative. The more crazy-sounding your thesis is, the better you will do. An obvious thesis has surely been written about many times by people that have more ability than you. So you need to go overboard. Trust me -- your professors will love it. Therefore, if your introduction and conclusion contain really a bizarre thesis, you're bound to get a good grade even if you prove your thesis through questionable means. See what I did there? I just rehashed my second and third paragraphs in my fifth and six paragraphs. And I've almost reached my word count. All I had to do was switch subjects and objects, thesaurus a couple of words, and -- presto! -- brand new paragraphs. While it may be that the professors at Tufts don't want you to know the paper-writing technique I've explained in this column, they actually secretly want you to use it because it actually makes your paper read a lot better. Even very successful paper-writers repeat themselves many times. And after all -- isn't repeating what successful paper-writing is really all about?


The Setonian
News

Buyback policy

The Daily should be applauded for its editorial on the bookstore concerning buyback policies ("Fixing the book system," March 29). It is important that students know the bookstore does not set its own prices when buying back books, nor is there a conscious decision to offer more new books than used. On the contrary, from a purely economic point of view it makes more sense for the store to offer used books as they are closer to online prices than are new ones and are therefore more likely to be purchased. Selling back your books at the end of the semester allows the bookstore to get more used books and saves you money next semester (as well as putting some cash in your pocket). However, to get the most money for your books, it is imperative that professors send the bookstore their book orders for next semester. If an order is received, the bookstore can offer 50 percent of the purchase price of the book, if not, it is forced to use the national wholesale price set by Barnes and Noble, often only a few dollars. Professors are simply not adhering to bookstore guidelines and students are paying the price. Book orders were due from professors Friday, April 2. At that point, the bookstore had only received orders from 20 percent of the faculty. Imagine if you only handed in 20 percent of your paper on the due date. You would have to answer for your shortcomings, just as you should hold your professors accountable for theirs. Implore your teachers to get their orders in so that you can finally make more than $10 for a semester's worth of books. Michael Robertson LA '04


The Setonian
News

How to kill Christianity

Gandhi is famous for saying, "I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your Christ." This comment is unsurprising to anyone who has spent some time with enough Christians. Not a few people have even suggested, as did Nietzsche, that Christianity itself is a public menace to be stamped out. This is not surprising. What is surprising is that the eradication hasn't yet succeeded. For the secret to destroying Christianity is amazingly simple -- just find the body. That is, the dead body of Jesus. A hundred years ago Professor Rudolf Bultmann became famous for saying that, "if the bones of the dead Jesus were discovered tomorrow in a Palestinian tomb, all the essentials of Christianity would remain unchanged." By "essentials" Bultmann meant things like "being nice," "serving others," and things of that sort. But for the majority of Christians who have ever lived, the essential has been the empty tomb on Easter Sunday. They follow an early Christian pastor, Paul, who wrote to a community he helped start, "If Christ has not been raised [from the dead], your faith is futile and you are still in your sins." For Bultmann, Jesus was simply a role model for his own self-help plan. But for Paul, Jesus was not just an example to be followed -- he was a solution to a problem, "being in your sins." It is a problem not only for the person, but for God. God's problem is that he loves sinners. He loves people enough to create them from nothing, but hates their pride, greed, hurtful remarks, and selfishness -- their sin. God can't stand it, can't be around it. The problem is when people in sin come together. When a person does what she knows to be wrong, that sin "sticks" to her. She can't shake it. She's guilty. If what goes around comes around, then when the going comes around she should, by all rights, get it. And we'd expect God to give it. That's justice. God can't just ignore the guilt. We expect good governments not to ignore human rights abuses; how could God ignore them? For that's what sins are -- human rights abuses, whether the harm is to others or oneself. How can God not ignore sin and yet also not destroy the very people he wants to love? The military often faces an analogous problem. The tyrant or the terrorist will often station in a hospital, or surround himself with civilians. He makes himself inextricable from the innocent. He seeks to exploit the fact that the leaders of the military, while they want to punish their enemies, don't want to target innocent civilians. Last year, those who opposed the Iraq war suggested bringing some beloved world figure, such as the Dalai Lama, into Baghdad. The thought was that the desire to preserve the life of Dalai Lama would override the intention to bring war upon Saddam. The Christian solution to God's problem is somewhat similar to this idea. While the Dalai Lama may be innocent relative to the U.S. government, no one is innocent relative to God because no one has ever not done anything wrong. But if God were a man he would not have to sin be punished. He, the God-man, would be innocent relative to God. Since it would be unjust to punish the innocent, God could cancel the debt of punishment due to the guilty if they 'hid' so closely with the God-man that they became inextricable from him. The justice of preserving the innocent would override the justice of punishing the guilty. God could rescue his beloved people from his own justice without himself being unjust, if he were to make an invasion into humanity and call them to himself, as a God-man. Christianity says that God did exactly that, and the man God became was Jesus of Nazareth. The evidence for that claim is that Jesus raised himself from the dead, and never died again. Other people claimed to get raised from the dead, but always by someone else (whether shamans or emergency room docs), and they always die a second time. The resurrection is not an ideal or a wish to Christians, but an event occurring in real space and time that proves God's rescue mission. If you find the body of Jesus, that shows he was not God. And if he was not God, then there's no rescue mission. And so Christianity dies. The whole faith rests on one historical fact: whether Jesus rose. That fact has proved very hard to disprove. The records of the New Testament, whatever you think of them theologically, are at least reliable as historical documents. The Gospels were written by first or second-hand witnesses, within the lifetimes of nearly everyone who saw Jesus die in Jerusalem. They record that Jesus was placed in a tomb belonging to a well-known member of the Jewish community, sealed with a Roman seal, and guarded by a squad of Roman soldiers at the request of the Jewish leaders. On Sunday the Roman guards had split, the seal was broken, the two-ton stone placed in front of the tomb was rolled away, and the tomb was empty. This is the news that the women took straight to Jerusalem. Anyone who didn't believe could go to the tomb himself, produce the body, and put an end to the question. And many certainly wanted to. But no body was ever brought forward. Was it a cover-up? Did the disciples steal the body and then lie? It's difficult to see how they could have. Roman soldiers were the ancient world's marines. They would not have been sleeping on the job. Breaking a Roman seal was akin to a federal offense, and the penalty was death by crucifixion. The disciples, who immediately after Jesus' arrest all proved themselves cowards, would not have had the courage to attempt such a thing. Even if they had, humans can't cover things up for long. We're really bad at it. But the disciples went to their deaths without ever recanting what they saw. And they weren't the only ones. Paul, in a letter, mentions that the risen Jesus appeared to over 500 people at one time, most of whom were still alive to testify. This is just a cursory summary of the evidence that Jesus really did rise from the grave, and that the initial message of the Christians, the message that soon came to convert the entire Roman Empire, was no hoax or hallucination. This limited article can only give hints and pique interest. It's much more fun to check out the fuller arguments for yourself. Put the central fact of Christianity to the test. Find out for yourself if it is true or false. "Check out The Case for Christ" by Lee Strobel or "Who Moved the Stone?" By Frank Morison are good books to get you started. Why believe (or disbelieve) something blindly? Jack Grimes is a senior majoring in Philosophy and Political Science. He can be reached at grimes@tuftsdaily.com.



The Setonian
News

Students have it eBay

Student shopping habits have gone online -- from discounted books at Amazon.com to online clothing retailers like gap.com -- ordering from the comforts of a dorm room has become the norm. An increasing number of people, however, are selling their own possessions on eBay, changing the end of the year dump-and-run to dump-and-sell. The popular website, through which members can buy and sell any goods they desire, was created by Tufts alumni Pierre and Pam Omidyar in September 1995. Members post a product which is then sold via a bidding system. Sophomore Mary Humphreys both buys and sells products on eBay. "Whenever I get low on money I go through my closet and look for clothes I don't use anymore," she said. Humphreys posts pictures of herself wearing the clothes -- from the neck down only -- on the website to advertise, and has had a good deal of success as a merchant. "Any kind of designer's name, people will buy it," she said. "I had Bebe shoes I bought for $50 and I sold them for $120." For many students, great deals and rare finds on eBay seem to be the norm. "I think it's useful for finding stuff that you might not know where to buy in a store or to get stuff cheaper than it usually would be," sophomore Seth Rosenberg said. "I bought a Burberry scarf for my friend last summer for her birthday for about a tenth of what it would normally cost." While searching the products offered on eBay, sophomore Alexis Ong was surprised to find a riot protection vehicle up for sale. "It had an AK-47 mounted on the roof and electrified panels," Ong said. Though not the most useful car to cruise around the Tufts campus, it is one of many rare -- and sometimes strange -- goods sold on eBay. Ong first used eBay to find a vintage bowling bag. "There's just so much stuff you can find on it -- like infinite mountains of junk," she said. Students do acknowledge several drawbacks to online shopping and, specifically, eBay. "It's so hard to bid on eBay when you are trying to bid on a really popular item like an iPod," Ong said. "Everyone is going to wait until the very last minute to bid, so the price rockets up by like $100 in the last minutes." Rosenberg agreed: "It kind of annoys me how people outbid you at the last second," he said. "Of course, now I've learned to do that myself." Overall, students are still on the fence about whether they really can "have it eBay." The comforts of one's own desk can be nice, but shopping in a store still has its benefits. Sophomore Hilary Pentz has perused eBay, but her online cart always remained empty. "I would [buy something], but it takes awhile to look for things you actually want," she said. "It's an investment to search online, compared to going to stores and getting immediate satisfaction." Humphreys was ripped off when she attempted to buy the first season of "Curb Your Enthusiasm" on DVD for her father last Christmas. "There were six disks total and four of them were ruined," she said. "And I waited forever to get them." Humphreys had few options for recourse. "I wrote him a bad review or whatever, but there was nothing else I could really do. I had been waiting so long for them that I didn't really care anymore." Despite experiences like Humphreys', most students feel that a balance between shopping online and shopping in stores is the smartest way to save money and avoid getting ripped off. As Humphreys explained, "I like shopping at a mall because you get it right away and you are able to try it on and there is that guarantee." In comparison, Humphreys uses eBay because, "it's generally cheaper and you can find a lot of stuff on eBay that you can't find at a mall." Rosenberg similarly divides his purchases. "In some cases I like [using eBay] better than going to the mall, but I wouldn't really buy clothes on eBay unless I knew they would fit." Most students find that eBay is best for objects and accessories -- purchases where size doesn't matter. "It depends on what I'm buying -- if it requires trying or testing I would prefer to be able to do that," Ong said. "But if it's stuff like bags and jewelry or a used iPod ... because if you manage to bid successfully on a used iPod, you're so money, baby."


The Setonian
News

Legislative funding something to be wary of

Colleges may be relying too heavily on state and federal funding sources to expand services, says one higher education expert. While the money can be beneficial, the major risk associated with legislative funding is that it can easily and quickly deteriorate. According to figures compiled by James Palmer and Sandra Gililan for The Chronicle of Higher Education, state appropriations to universities increased slightly last year to $63.6 billion. This 1.2 percent increase was less than the cost of inflation, however, meaning the actual appropriations has decreased in real dollars. In Massachusetts, overall budget cuts forced a 2.8 percent cut in overall appropriations. Grants to private universities from the Massachusetts legislature decreased 38 percent in the academic year 2002-03 to just under $12 million. Chronicle politics and education columnist Stanley Fish said that schools need to be firm in their dealings with legislators in order to maintain a constant source of funds. "It takes a long time to build [a community] but it only takes a short time to fall," he said. Fish is also the Dean of the College of Liberal Arts and Sciences at the University of Illinois at Chicago. The need to cultivate relationships with government has become more acute recently as a number of states have faced severe budget shortfalls over the past three years. As a result, education budgets have been trimmed around the country. Fish said that limited funds can lead to a transformation of public universities. "As the percentage of state money supply drops, and demand is increased [universities] must find other sources of revenue such as private donors." This, he said, "betrays the ideal" of public universities, which were designed to be state-supported spheres of education. Although the public money compromises only a fraction of Tufts budget, the school is not immune from legislative interests. Tufts was one of the earlier universities that employed a lobbying firm, done during the 1980s under the leadership of former President Jean Mayer. Currently, the school employs the Dutko Group in Washington, D.C. to lobby for federal monies. Dutko Group officials referred questions about this article to Tufts Vice President of University Relations Mary Jeka. Jeka said the school had a successful relationship with legislators, one that could be measured in results. "We have been able to secure critical funding for numerous important projects across the University," she said, "such as the Veterinary School and the Jean Mayer Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging." Around eight percent of the Veterinary School's revenue is directly provided from Massachusetts. The school has received the money for the past 25 years in exchange for providing care to the state police canine units. The Vet School looked to be in serious trouble when Governor Mitt Romney proposed cutting the $3.6 million in state grants to the vet school last year. Under pressure, the state senate eventually restored $3 million in funding, and the governor's current budget proposes keeping this constant for the next year. The school is still waiting on legislative approval before the budget will be finalized. Cuts like these one's can be devastating. "There is not only a loss of faculty," Fish said, "but the cost of delivering instruction rises. Essentially schools will be making do with less." Vet School Public Relations Officer Barbara Donato declined to comment on the school's current relationship with legislators. She only said, "This type of funding is not the type of thing that is spoken about [until numbers are concrete]." Romney has been accused of taking too much of a businesslike approach to state government, particularly in relation to the reorganization of the University of Massachusetts (UMass) system. Last year Romney cut $150 million from the UMass system amidst the budget cuts. Fish said this attitude can be dangerous when applied to higher education. "Non-university [officials] haven't the slightest idea [about how things run], nevertheless they dream up schemes based on corporate business," he said. Fish had several suggestions for creating and maintaining a strong relationship with public legislating bodies. He said that first and foremost, administrators should be direct. "They come to the legislature with hat in hand, but they leave with an empty hat," he said, "If they laid it straight and didn't use weasley vocabulary they would get the money. [No one] likes to work with someone in a position of defensiveness." Fish argued that administrators should also be direct in asking for funds. "Chancellors and Deans don't get anywhere by being apologetic," he said. Though often funding is spoken of in hushed voices, Fish states that schools must be firm with legislators in their dealings. Fish's viewpoint is not shared by all. American Association of University Professors Director of Public Policy and Communication Ruth Flower said the best way to work with legislators is to acquaint them with the campus. "Legislators respond to people they know, if their friends are different from universities friends, the university needs to change that, they must acquaint them with the campus," she said. "There needs to have sense among legislators that it's our university, [which necessitates an] ongoing lobbying job of university." In one administrator's eyes, however, Tufts is already doing an adequate job working with government. "Tufts has a very good working relationship with our federal and state legislators," Jeka said.


The Setonian
News

Senate snubs academic bill of rights proposal

In a surprise move, the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate chose last night to not discuss the merits of a proposed "Academic Bill of Rights," instead ruling that the proposal was outside the bounds of TCU Senate consideration. The proposal, created by the Students for Intellectual Diversity -- an offshoot of the Tufts Republicans -- hoped to secure a TCU Senate "commitment to academic freedom and intellectual diversity," to encourage University grading, hiring, and discipline processes to be carried out with no regard to political or ideological beliefs. Tufts Republicans President Philipp Tsipman delivered the proposal to the Senate's executive board last Wednesday. At last night's meeting, the executive board announced its unanimous decision to not bring the proposal to the full Senate floor. The "Tufts Academic Bill of Rights" is based largely on the "Academic Bill of Rights" written by David Horowitz and the Students for Academic Freedom. Horowitz spoke at the University last Thursday night in a Tufts Republicans-sponsored event. A version of Horowitz's "Academic Bill of Rights" has been introduced as legislation by Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives and was passed by a 41-5 majority in the Georgia State Senate. A version of the "Academic Bill of Rights," labeled the "Student Bill of Rights," is being considered by several college and university student governments throughout the country, and aspects of it have already been adopted by the University of Montana and the University of Colorado. It was because the issue is being considered on a national stage that TCU President Chike Aguh and the executive board chose not to have the entire Senate address the issue. The executive board is made up of Aguh, Parliamentarian Dave Baumwoll, TCU Treasurer Josh Belkin, Associate TCU Treasurer Cho Ling, Historian Jeff Katzin, and Vice President Joe Mead. "We as the TCU cannot put our name on something that is tied to something in the national arena," Aguh said. The ensuing constitutional debate at last night's meeting centered on Article 2, Section A of the TCU constitution. "The members of the Tufts Community Union Senate shall: Represent the needs and interests of the TCU, as a whole or the constituent groups thereof, before the Faculty of the undergraduate colleges, the administration, and the Trustees of Tufts College," it reads. The executive board decided that the issue did not fit the spirit of the wording, "the needs and interests of the TCU," and it felt the Senate was being asked to weigh-in on a national debate. The Senate in previous years has voted on national and international matters such as the Middle East peace situation. Some senators felt the executive board had decided on the issue without the consent of the entire Senate. "Our voices as senators were taken away from us," freshman Senator Andrew Caplan said. TCU Treasurer Josh Belkin said the issues of the proposal would be raised in committees on which senators serve with faculty members. "We're not choosing not to discuss it, we're choosing how it will be discussed," he said. Tufts Republicans member Jordana Starr suggested the national significance of the proposal was a secondary consideration to the implications for the TCU. "It's entirely independent of anything that could be going on outside of the Tufts community," she said. Following the discussion, the Senate voted on whether to overturn the executive board's decision and allow the entire Senate to debate the merits of the proposal. Of the 27 voting members of the Senate, 16 voted to uphold the executive board's decision, six voted to overturn it, and five abstained. Only a two-thirds majority would have overturned the decision. Following the TCU Senate's decision to not discuss the "Academic Bill of Rights," Tsipman said he "was certainly very surprised that they would violate their role in addressing student concerns." He said that since last night's meeting was the current TCU Senate's last of the semester, the decision was "especially disappointing." Tsipman said he will bring up the proposal with the Senate's education committee and the Senate's decision will likely be appealed to the TCU Judiciary (TCUJ). Neither Starr nor Tufts Republicans member Nick Boyd, both members of the TCUJ, have decided whether or not they would recuse themselves in the case of an appeal vote. According to Dean of Students Bruce Reitman, had the resolution been passed it would not compel the administration to act. Reitman said the labeling of the resolution as a bill of rights does not differentiate it from any other Senate resolution. "It doesn't carry any more weight because they're calling it something different," he said. "The Senate isn't in a place to mandate change," Reitman said. "The curriculum is ultimately in the hands of the faculty." Reitman said there are already guidelines in place to discipline professors who do not limit their lessons to the course material. "A professor can't use a course in fine arts to be lecturing about politics," he said. "That piece of it has been taken care of." Another aspect, Reitman said, is whether or not an entire department has a political leaning. In discussions following Horowitz's speech at Tufts Thursday night, students expressed different opinions on perceived biases of several departments to Reitman. Reitman said this disagreement meant that most students' feelings towards certain departments depend on their perspective. According to Reitman, who spent his undergraduate years at Tufts, the campus is more conservative now than it was three decades ago. Because the tenure process takes seven years, the faculty cannot change significantly in the four years students are at Tufts. Therefore, Reitman said, the change in the political environment on campus is too gradual to affect the students bringing about the change. "We've moved to a point where campus dialogue is encouraged to be inclusive of many voices, especially if they are divergent," he said. Reitman added that "free speech used to be the tool of liberals, and now it's the tool of conservatives."


The Setonian
News

Luxury dorms, but at what cost?

It's a freshman's right to complain about sub-par living situations. Every incoming college student is warned about shoebox sized rooms, no closet space, and smelly roommates, not to mention communal bathrooms. Not any more. According to a Dec. 22 Time Magazine article, "Dorm Deluxe," an increasing number of colleges across the country are building new, luxury dorms that students have the option to live in -- for an additional price. Now students have the option to pay more in order to avoid the living situations bestowed on students in the past. To some students, these luxury dorms are worth the price. For an additional $6,000 to $7,000 on top of tuition, students can live in brand-new, state-of-the-art buildings. These high-tech buildings, available at schools such as Chicago's Illinois Institute of Technology, Florida International University, and Seattle Pacific University, come equipped with stainless steel panels and walls of tinted glass. There are glass elevators, leather sofas, 50-inch plasma screen televisions, floor to ceiling panoramic windows, Jacuzzis, and a high-speed, wireless internet connection that, among many other things, can tell you when your laundry's done. Tufts students won't be watching the Red Sox on plasma televisions or relaxing in their personal hot tub after a workout at Gantcher any time soon, however. Due to the historical status of the building (20 Professors Row) it is slated to replace, construction on Tufts' proposed new dorm, Sophia Gordon Hall, has yet to begin, and the dorm's layout and design are not "luxury." Most students do not mind that the new dorm will not offer luxury amenities to those with the cash to pay for them. "I think [offering luxury rooms] defeats the purpose of being a freshman," junior Sara Brauner said. "There is plenty of time to be segregated by socio-economic status. Why not prolong at least a feeling of equality?" Some worry that singling out wealthy students will make the students on financial aid feel inferior; calling attention to a fact that had never before been anyone's business. "It takes away from the fairness of the dorm system, where everyone is equal no matter how much your parents make or how much financial aid you're on," junior Blake Barnes said. "The rich kids live in the same small and smelly rooms as the kids on financial aid. Everyone starts out at square one." But if parents can afford it, why deny their children such luxuries, some ask. "It makes sense logically if the parent wanted to put their child in that environment and has the financial means to do so, it is their right to reap the benefits of what they have earned," junior Hassan Omar said. The extra money from the additional cost of the luxury dorms would also bring universities a whole new source of revenue: according to the Time article, it would attract more students whose families could donate large sums of money to university capital campaigns. Even though the perks of luxury dorms appeal to Tufts students' senses, most would rather have a less luxurious but more equal and diverse academic setting than a more luxurious but class-conscious one. Though he recognized that offering luxury dorms to those students who can afford them might increase Tufts' profit margin from housing, junior Tim Wagner said that the tradeoff is not worth it. "I certainly think [luxury dorms] would segregate the community," Wagner said. "Tufts is already far from unified, and it seems to me, class is a big segregator -- if that's a word -- that we don't talk about a lot. I think the luxury dorms would only exacerbate the issue."


The Setonian
News

Following national trend, Tufts students take on climate change

To combat the Bush administration's energy policy, Tufts Eco Club created the Renewable Energy Committee (REC). The group will work to bring awareness about human-induced climate change. "We created REC to promote awareness of climate change and to gain political recognition," REC coordinator and junior Jennifer Baldwin said. "We want [Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney] to initiate a climate action plan." Two years ago when the U.S. withdrew from the Kyoto Treaty (an international agreement limiting greenhouse gas emissions from country to country), Tufts Institute of the Environment pledged to adhere to the goals laid out by the Treaty, even if the federal government withdrew. REC will continue to work toward the goals of Kyoto. The precedent for the REC's convening on April 1 was set on Nov. 13, 2003, when 65 youth and student-run organizations and environmental groups across the country discussed and promoted the use of clean energy. "The purpose of April 1 was to show solidarity and show that [renewable energy] is important," REC co-coordinator and freshman Aditya Nochur said. REC's short-term goal is to help Tufts get 20 percent of its energy from renewable energy sources. REC will also support a state-wide letter-writing drive to Romney, asking him to support renewable energy solutions. Other schools across the nation have also initiated creative campaigns, activities, and groups to support renewable energy. The California Student Sustainability Coalition, based at University of California at Berkeley (UC Berkley), aims to bring about positive environmental change by combining activism and education. A fully accredited UC Berkeley course conducted by scientists, authors, activists and scholars intends to educate and inspire students through service-learning programs that make the campus more sustainable. Students for Renewable Energy at Western Washington University conducted a campus education initiative on April 1 and encouraged students to vote for a $19 activity fee increase to purchase 100 percent renewable electricity on campus. Though some Tufts students feel that paying extra money for increased renewable energy use is unnecessary, others would be willing. Sophomore Liz Halperin wouldn't mind paying the full $20. "We're already paying $40,000, so $20 extra is pretty insignificant," she said. According to energyaction.net, over 150 U.S. cities have pledged to voluntarily reduce carbon emissions through "conservation, energy efficiency, and the use of renewable energy." Wind energy has become the fastest growing renewable energy source on a global level. Environmentalists support alternative energy sources because of the air pollution caused by burning coal, as well as the fact that coal mining can result in environmental disasters like flash floods and ruined water supplies. Advocates of America's continued reliance on coal and oil are less supportive of the development of alternative energy sources, largely because of the resulting economic damage to the coal and oil industries and those who work in them: in early April, President Bush proposed lessening coal mining regulations in order to create more job opportunities and strengthen the economy.


The Setonian
News

More is sexy this spring

What is sexy? Everyone has a different opinion on the subject. Many people assume that sexy automatically means more skin. Well, if Victoria Secret commercials have taught us anything, it's that how you cover up is more important than what you are covering. Thus, sexy doesn't necessarily translate into tight, revealing clothing. It's all about what you leave to the imagination. In fact, someone doesn't have to be really "hot" to look sexy in a great outfit. How clothing is worn is incredibly important. Not everyone should be prancing about in short shorts and tank tops. Yet, even if you have the body to pull off hot pants, remember that such overt displays are far more raunchy than sexy. Most people would agree that a really nice suit is much more attractive. Maintaining a little mystery is quite alluring. Designers have recently caught on to this idea in their runway collections. Particularly in women's wear, spring clothing possesses a distinctly prim and proper air. Of course, you can still find scandalously cut clothing out there, but there is a discernable trend towards elegant, lady-like designs. What exactly qualifies as ladylike, you ask? Many designers have answered this question with vintage-looking clothing that recalls the timeless elegance of the '30s, the restrained sultriness of the '0s, and the ultra-feminine silhouette of the '50s. The shape of skirts is of particular interest this season. Fashion works in cycles, so it makes sense that hemlines are lowering after the recent popularity of the micro-mini skirt. Perhaps designers decided that they finally needed to put an end to the atrocious "mini skirt with Ugg boot" fad. Whatever the reason, you'll find more knee-length pencil skirts and A-line skirts in stores this season. Also, clothing seems to be returning once again to a more formal standard. A friend recently observed, "It's impossible to look truly put together with today's 'sporty-chic' look." Have you been kidding yourself all this time that funky little gym shoes and colorful track jackets (particularly ones bearing the Puma logo) look sleek and polished? Don't get me wrong, this look has its time and place, but don't expect it to hang on with widespread popularity. Instead, expect more dainty heels and fitted trench coats. If there's anything more mysteriously sexy than a pair of great heels and a sassy trench, I'd like to know! So, what's sexy for men these days? You'll see the same trend towards refined elegance in menswear as well as women's wear. Button down collared shirts in classic fabrics like checks and stripes are big. Add a nice sweater and a snappy pinstripe blazer, and you've got a very dapper look. The preppies are back in full force, so be ready with your pastel polos and khaki trousers. Those ultimate preps among us may feel the need to turn up their collars and tie a sweater around their shoulders, but let's not get too carried away. Yet, with all this preppiness going around, one must be careful to preserve a little bad-ass. You don't want to end up looking exactly like you father. Keep an edge with bold accessories like studded leather cuff bracelets and funky shoes. Maybe get a little "anti-establishment" with a motorcycle jacket. Think about adding a little metal to your look with zippers and buckles. Nothing says bad-ass like the glint of cold, hard steel! Most importantly, don't be afraid to mix classy and cool -- like a blazer with jeans and sneakers. This season is all about discreet sexiness and embracing a more elegant, refined aesthetic. As always, keep things fresh with interesting accessories. Just because your clothes look retro, doesn't mean you have to look old. Experiment with wearing traditional clothing in non-traditional ways and have fun! Finally, don't shy away from wearing a style that you've never worn before. After all, confidence is your sexiest accessory.


The Setonian
News

Baseball Notes: Alums return for home opener

The baseball team's home opener saw the unveiling of the new Tufts Baseball Press Box, a gift of alumni Todd Romboli (A93) and Steve Lee (A97). The box sits atop the first base dugout, and while just a raw timber shell at present, gives a sweeping view of Huskins Field, while also providing some much needed shelter from Saturday's bitter wind. At least ten baseball alumni were on hand to watch the team open the season before some went to the 2004 Jumbo Club Awards Dinner in Cousens Gymnasium. "It was nice to see so many alums back, I think that speaks a lot to the program," senior co-captain Randy Newsom said. "When you have kids coming from Connecticut, a guy flying in from Chicago, and a guy coming up from New York, just to watch us open up at home, that's when you know you're part of something special. That's what I hope these freshmen realize." Running up the pitch count Sophomore starter Zak Smotherman ran the count full on seven of the 18 batters he faced, and threw 40 pitches alone in Wesleyan's three-run fourth inning of Saturday's second game. But the southpaw lowered his ERA by nearly half a run with the four-inning, four-run (only two earned) outing, finishing the day with a 4.63 ERA. Pick me, pick me Senior infielder Nick Palange has served largely in the utility role throughout his career, entering the season with a .235 average in 132 career at bats. But the Southboro, MA native has been pressing coach John Casey for more playing time with his surprising offensive start this season, batting .361 through yesterday's games at Wesleyan, with a team-high two homers and a lofty .611 slugging percentage. "Realizing that I've just got to go out and not worry about everything and not get too stressed over each particular play or at bat [has been a big difference]," Palange explained. "It's obviously been working so far for me personally, but honestly, after a game like [Saturday's 6-0 loss to Wesleyan] it doesn't matter how well I played, you'd much rather play badly and win than play well and lose." Freshman nerves? No sir Freshman center fielder Chris Decembrele had an eight pitch battle with Wesleyan starter Eric Wdowiak in the third inning of Saturday's 9-8 win. With two runners on, Decembrele worked the count full before fouling off two pitches, then laced a slicing drive down the leftfield line for a two-run double that gave Tufts a 7-2 lead.


The Setonian
News

Jumbos take three of four from Wesleyan

After a 5-5 spring trip and a week off due to Wednesday's rainout at Mass Maritime, the Tufts baseball team finally hit the field this weekend, traveling to Middletown, Connecticut on Sunday for a doubleheader against the Wesleyan Cardinals after having launched the 2004 Jumbo home season Saturday at Tufts' Huskins Field, also against Wesleyan. Sunday's games proved to be pitching battles, with juniors Jeremy Davis (2-1, 6.91 ERA) and Jeff Volinski (1-0, 2.00 ERA) both pitching strongly in their starts with six-and-a-third and five innings of work respectively. Davis picked up the win in game one -- a 4-2 Jumbo victory -- with a two-run, eight-hit performance that helped reestablish his position in the rotation after two shaky outings earlier in the season. Tufts notched 11 hits in the game, scoring a run in the fourth on a single and steal by freshman Kyle Backstrom and a single by sophomore shortstop Greg Chertok. The Jumbos added a run in the fifth and two in the sixth to hold off Wesleyan, which scored a run in the bottom of the seventh but was shutdown by freshman Aaron Narva, who got Wesleyan's Jarred Gagnon to ground into a game-ending double play. Volinski put in five innings of four-hit, two-run work in game two, staking Tufts to a 3-2 lead before giving way to freshman Ben Simon, who pitched two scoreless innings for the save. Wesleyan pitchers Andrew Sternberg and Brian Mahr gave up just two hits to the Jumbos -- singles to sophomore catcher Ben Chang and freshman left fielder Brian Casey -- but the Jumbos capitalized on three errors by the Cardinals, including two in the third and one in the fifth, to win. The games were a dramatic turnaround from Saturday's performance in cold, damp, overcast conditions that hinted at yet another impending deluge. But the rain never came, and the teams took to the still-soft field for the doubleheader. Tufts took the opener in a wild 9-8 win before Wesleyan struck back with a 6-0 shutout in the second. "Even though the first game ended up being a win, we didn't play well for the second half of that game at all, and it almost cost us," senior infielder Nick Palange said Senior co-captain Randy Newsom (3-0, 4.68 ERA) took the hill for Tufts in the opener, and the game did not begin cleanly. Cardinals sophomore centerfielder Jeff Maier (.469 BA, 3 HR), led off the first with a wind-assisted solo homer to right field. The Jumbos struck back quickly with three runs of their own in the bottom of the frame. Senior co-captain and third baseman Adam Kacamburas (.340 BA, 15 R) was hit by a pitch from Wesleyan starter Eric Wdowiak (1-2, 8.10 ERA) to lead off. One out later sophomore right fielder Matt Clement (team-leading .476 average, .607 on-base percentage) and freshman first baseman Bryan McDavitt hit back-to-back doubles to right center, with McDavitt scoring the third Jumbo run on a Wdowiak wild pitch. Wesleyan got one back in the third, but Tufts answered with five of its own to lead 8-2 after three innings, on a series of Tufts hits capped off by junior catcher Bob Kenny. "Bob Kenny behind the plate has been awesome," Newsom said. "He's hitting .350 and the kid's catching every game. He's just been fantastic." Newsom gave up two more in the fourth, but Palange (.361, 2 HR) answered with what proved to be the deciding run, a leadoff homer to right off Wesleyan reliever Michael Dacey to give the Jumbos a 9-4 lead. "I feel like I'm hitting great, I don't know whether I just figured it out all of a sudden or what happened," Palange said. Newsom set down seven straight going into the seventh but quickly fell apart and was pulled for classmate Dave Frew (0-2, 1.06 ERA). Frew hit a batter and allowed an RBI groundout and sacrifice fly to put Wesleyan within one (9-8), but sophomore southpaw Zak Smotherman came in and needed just one pitch to get RF Rob Coughlin to fly to right to end it and preserve the win for Newsom. "I was the one who threw the worst out of the group, and I ended up getting the win," Newsom said. The nightcap started in much the same way the opener did, with Maier again going deep to right to lead off the game, this time off Smotherman, who stayed on the mound for the game two start. The blast seemed to spark something in the lefty, who set down the next 11 batters, including four in a row on strikes in the second and third innings. After retiring the first two Cardinals in the fourth, a 3-2 single by Alexander Brooks and consecutive walks to Jason Vitko and Coughlin loaded the bases for junior DH Dimitri Paleokrasses, who worked the count full. Smotherman's payoff pitch, a knee-high fastball, appeared to be a called third strike, but the plate umpire disagreed, allowing Brooks to walk in. The call brought coach John Casey storming from the dugout amid a flurry of strong words to back up his pitcher. "I thought it was a good pitch, and you can't have your kid out there making good pitches and not defend him," Casey said. After meeting on the mound with Smotherman and Kenny, Casey returned to the dugout and Smotherman worked the count to 1-1 on catcher Tom Stevens before getting what looked like an inning-ending grounder to short. But the ball skipped through the legs of Tufts' junior shortstop Frank Dinucci, allowing another two runs to score. "It was a routine groundball. You saw their shortstop make it; our guy's got to make it," Casey said. "If you want to win games, you've got to make the plays." The Cardinals put up a 6-0 lead with another two runs off sophomore lefty Erik Johanson in the fifth -- both unearned on a Kacamburas error -- before being shutdown in the final two frames. Wesleyan starter Tom Blass (3-1, 1.69 ERA), meanwhile, stifled the Tufts offense, which looked flat from midway through the opener onwards. Blass allowed just two singles, one an infield shot by Dinucci in the fourth that Vitko lunged at and knocked down. Blass struck out five and walked four, but didn't allow a Jumbo beyond second to record his second straight shutout of the season. Palange, however, felt that the Jumbos could have made the game more of a contest. "He was a good pitcher but I think we didn't do what we could have off of him," Palange said. "I don't think we brought our game up to his level like we should have."


The Setonian
News

Serve Yourself

April is my least favorite time of year at Tufts. The weather is rainy. Coursework is bearing down on you. You're dealing with summer plans, fall plans, life plans. Then there's the fact that every possible extracurricular event under the sun occurs in April. From plays to sports events and a cappella events to academic symposia, April wears us out. As I prepared myself for a month of little sleep and lots of late night Brown and Brew, I was reminded of something Byllye Avery, a health care activist and founder of the National Black Women's Health Project, said when she came to speak here in the fall. She commented on the tendency of leaders to get so caught up in helping other people, that we forget to take care of ourselves. She suggested that students consciously take one hour a day just for themselves. No homework, no housemates, no e-mail. But that's hard. I find myself even negotiating with that dictate. How about one hour, three days a week? Where amidst the chaos that is college life do we find 1/24 of our day to just give away...to ourselves? I don't think Tufts is a particularly competitive environment, certainly nowhere along the lines of other institutions where students fight each other tooth and nail to succeed. But it takes a certain amount of drive (or family money) to get into a school like Tufts. We have demonstrated in our high school experiences that we are not slackers. We have motivation. We have desire. We have intellect. And many of us also have the urge to serve our communities. As an institution, Tufts takes pride in its commitment to public service, and pride in its students' involvement. Looking through the students profiled in one of the new admissions publications sent to admitted students, there is a clear emphasis on students who have been involved in pretty impressive public service activities, some even in high school. In choosing to profile these students, the University sends the message, "Come here, and you can do these things, too!" However, this isn't necessarily possible for all students, or desirable. There is some merit to being one of the 'ordinary' students at Tufts. The ordinary student doesn't completely forsake his or her civic responsibilities, but understands the importance of a well-rounded college life. He knows that he has his entire life ahead of him to make change, but only four years to go to frat parties, explore the city, make friends, and just enjoy life with little responsibility. I'm not saying that public service isn't a virtuous activity by any means. But as an institution, are we encouraging students to help others to the point of failing to take care of themselves? If one looks at the equivalent "public service" activities done by the University in terms of its community relations, it certainly seems to be the case. In several instances, the University focuses on helping the communities of Medford and Somerville at the expense of the student population. Take the issues surrounding the construction of Sophia Gordon Hall. The University has failed to take a strong stance against the manipulative, extortive tactics of the City of Somerville, in the interest of community relations, at the expense of the student body, who will have to go yet another year with nothing done to relieve the chronic housing shortage. Just look at the programs available here. The University has numerous programs designed at increasing the health status of populations in Somerville and Chinatown, yet we are one of the few colleges in our peer group with no comprehensive campus health education program. There is an entire division of the University designed to assist and encourage students to pursue public service, yet resources for students' personal development are at best limited, and at worst, nonexistent. We have one of the highest tuitions in the country. Yet our dorms and classrooms are lackluster at best. Students are the customers of this University, and they should thus be the priority. We don't pay to go here to help other people. We (or our parents) pay to better our own situation. In the end that may lead to bettering the situation of others, as it well should. But the University has an obligation to provide services to its students so as to make the healthiest college experience possible. The money and student interest is out there, contrary to the belief of some administrative and student leaders. Students recognize the stressors that exist on this campus just as much as they recognize the issues of poverty and social inequity in our surrounding communities. This year, Health Services is sponsoring a Spring Oasis, a health fair designed to reduce stress during this most stressful month of the year. There is no reason why programs like this cannot fill our calendar throughout the year, if the administration shows some commitment to it. Sure, public service is great, and sounds great in appeals to donors and prospective students. But students shouldn't feel pressured to do public service because Tufts says so. The best public service programs come from personal passions and inspirations. And those passions and inspirations come with time. If we overwork ourselves in our undergraduate years, we may never see those passions come to fruition. As Byllye Avery pointed out, if you don't take care of yourself, eventually you won't be around to take care of other people. Like most things in life, a balance of public and personal service will yield the best outcomes for all parties involved. As the Jewish philosopher Hillel famously said, "If I am not for myself, who will be for me? If I am only for myself, what am I? If not now, when?" We have our entire lives to worry about other people. For now, we have to remember to also worry about ourselves. Adam Pulver is a junior majoring in political science and community health. He can be reached at pulver@tuftsdaily.com.


The Setonian
News

Horowitz pushes end to partisan professoriate

As part of its effort to support a Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate resolution sponsoring an Academic Bill of Rights, the Tufts Republicans hosted social critic, author, and commentator David Horowitz last Thursday. Horowitz, the editor of the conservative online journal FrontPage Magazine, spoke on what he identified as a lack of political diversity among professors at the nation's colleges and universities. "You can't get a good education if they're only telling you half the story, even if you're paying $40,000," Horowitz said. Horowitz cited a study by his Center for the Study of Popular Culture that identified a ten-to-one majority of registered Democrat to Republican tenured or tenure-track professors at 32 top colleges and universities. The study found Tufts to have 12 Democrats, one Republican, and 84 unaffiliated. The data did not include professors who were not registered to vote in their college's area. "It's not meant to be a scientific study," Horowitz said in an interview after the speech. "It's meant to show there's a problem. I needed people to say 'Maybe something should be done about this.'" In his speech, Horowitz said an Academic Bill of Rights, which would make it against University policy to consider political affiliation when hiring professors, could help end the status quo, which he called "as effective as an overt blacklist" against conservatives. According to Horowitz, most professors do not become political in the classroom, but for those professors who do, the impact can be great on impressionable students. "It's a temptation," he said. "Why not sell them your pet prejudices?" When asked in the interview why having a balance of partisan views in the classroom matters, Horowitz said that without a balance, "the quality of education suffers." Horowitz grew up a socialist with communist parents but became a conservative soon after he finished college. He said that the abundance of liberal professors makes conservative students better conservatives by challenging their views in the classroom, and more conservative professors would make liberal students better liberals. Horowitz said for most students, the political views of a professor would not change their own views, but even the effect on the few students warrants a change Horowitz's speech also touched on the war in Iraq, the war on terrorism, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. "This war was not about weapons of mass destruction, and it was not about an imminent threat," Horowitz said. Later, he added, "we didn't go into Iraq for humanitarian reasons." When asked in the interview what the true reason for war was, Horowitz identified Saddam Hussein's violation of the United Nations resolution forcing him to disarm. He also said the U.S. was compelled to attack once the threat had been made. "If it backs off, its word will never be credible." On whether the war hurt the U.N.'s credibility, Horowitz said "France has undermined the U.N." by threatening a veto prior to the war. "The U.N. hasn't done anything to keep the peace anywhere," he said. "There's only one peacekeeper, and that's us." In his speech, Horowitz said Democrats in Congress have undermined the U.S. effort to win the war in Iraq. "There is only one reason there have been no attacks on this country since Sept. 11, and that's because George Bush has taken the war to the enemy camp." Speaking about the possibility of Sen. John Kerry's election in November, Horowitz said, "If he is elected, the war will return to New York and Washington." He added that in Iraq, "we've lost 500 good lives, but they volunteered." Horowitz said liberals in the U.S. detract from the war on terrorism. "The principle of the left is that they hate America," he said. "We are now in a global war, where a death sentence has been placed on all of our heads. If you are not proud of your country, you cannot defend yourself." Prior to his discussion of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, Horowitz cautioned the audience that he was not an expert on the Middle East. Horowitz has a B.A. and M.A. in English from Columbia University and the University of California at Berkley, respectively. He put the blame for the conflict solely on the Palestinians. "Islam, as interpreted by the Palestinians, is a racist, Nazi-like ideology that cannot tolerate non-Muslims unless they are subordinate to them," he said. "Forgive me for not having any sympathy for this problem." Horowitz added that "Palestinian nationalism is entirely part of a political campaign to destroy the Israeli state." In his speech, Horowitz attacked Democrats on large city legislatures and school boards for not encouraging change. He said city schools are "run just like the Soviet Union -- there is no connection between performance and reward." He said those on the political left dominate large city legislatures, and that "liberals and leftists have their boot heels on the necks of poor blacks and Hispanics." In the interview, Horowitz said the recent vote by Denver Public Schools' teachers' union to adopt a performance-related contract with the district was "an example of change." Whether the school board is controlled by Republicans or, as in the Denver case, Democrats, he said, "I always praise this." Time constraints cut off the question and answer session, which was brief and calm from the approximately 50 members of the largely conservative audience. Referring to the language he used in his speech, Horowitz said in the interview, "I have to be entertaining."


The Setonian
News

Boston probably in playoffs, despite GM's wishes

You don't always get what you wish for. This credence has held true in the NBA's Eastern Conference, where it appears that several teams gunning for the playoffs will come up short while a team whose general manager wanted them to lose will make the cut. With under two weeks remaining in the regular season, the Boston Celtics (35-42) seem to have an insurmountable lead on the Cleveland Cavaliers (32-44), Philadelphia 76ers (32-45), and Toronto Raptors (30-45). Ironically, the latter three teams made personnel moves to try to reach the postseason, while Boston GM Danny Ainge wanted his team to avoid it like the plague. Cleveland traded for veterans Tony Battie, Eric Williams, and Jeff McInnis. The 76ers dealt for Glenn Robinson in the offseason, a well-intentioned but misguided trade if ever there was one. The Raptors gave Vince Carter some buddies who could put the ball in the hoop in Jalen Rose and Donyell Marshall. And none of those moves have elevated those teams to the playoffs. It should be noted that Cleveland's defense, intensity, and record all improved drastically post-trade, and they probably would have made the playoffs if not for McInnis' recent injury. But the bottom line is that with only five or six games remaining for each team, the Cavs are still 2.5 games back from the Celtics. The Celtics weren't supposed to be here, not after Ainge traded Antoine Walker for Jiri Welsch, Chris Mills, and Raef Lafrentz. Not after Ainge traded Battie and Williams for Ricky Davis and Chris Mihm. Not after he named John Carroll as a lame duck coach. But that's the way it happened. Again, ironically, it seems that Boston's turnaround coincided with Ainge admitting that he wouldn't mind if Boston ended up in the lottery instead of the playoffs. Maybe this makes Ainge an accidental motivational genius. The players don't need to like their coach but they need to respect him; it doesn't even matter if they respect the GM. They can hate him (or at least his decisions) and band against him, and that seems to be what the Celtics are doing here. Could the Celts be overtaken? Sure. But they have a pretty favorable schedule remaining, with two of their last three games at Miami. The Cavs, on the other hand, play five of their remaining six games against playoff teams, including a road game against the Memphis Grizzlies. And Philly's schedule is pretty tough too. It's possible that Boston could go 2-5 and Cleveland could go 5-2, especially if Atlanta decides to play the spoiler role. But that would mean a complete collapse by the Celtics, and Paul Pierce probably won't let that happen. It's certainly been a wacky season in the East; if someone had told you before the season that Philly, Toronto and the Orlando Magic would miss the playoffs, while the Milwaukee Bucks and Miami Heat would be there, you would have looked at them like they were crazier than Mike Tyson, and immediately moved your children to a safe location.


The Setonian
News

Disses flew at TCU Senate's Rap Off

Even Jumbo himself showed up with his best lyrics to freeflow over beats at the 3rd Annual Rap Off on Friday. The fundraising event 3rd Annual Rap Off was held in Dewick-MacPhie Friday night, with the proceeds going to the financial aid office's Helping Undergraduates fund (HUG fund). The event, sponsored by the TCU Senate, kicked off with a performance by The Beats. The second part of the night's lineup featured various "group battles" that pitted different student groups and organizations against each other. To round out the evening, there was a "freestyle" segment open to all comers. Senator Jeff Katzin was the MC for the night and set the tone for an evening full of a sort of hip hop humor that cannot be found on any radio station or CD. DJ Entyce (sophomore Vijay Nathan) of Profound Sound Productions provided the beats and sound for the night. The event featured more disses than the widely publicized 50 Cent-Ja Rule feud. In the most closely contested group battle fraternities Theta Chi, Zeta Beta Tau (ZBT), and late-entry Delta Tau Delta (DTD) took to the mic to show everyone how to do the pledge thing right. With a group that resembled a Brady Bunch-Cash Money Clique hybrid, Theta Chi used a second, "recount" rap to squeeze by second place ZBT. In the end, Theta Chi proved that they throw the better party -- at least on stage. TCU Senate and Tufts' Track team flexed their lyrical muscle solo, as their respective competitors for the evening suffered a no show due to organizational issues. The opening group-battle, featuring Hillel and the Secular Student Association., did run as planned however. With the season of Passover upon them, Hillel had that something extra they needed to get by the SSA. The battle was intense with fierce slams coming from both groups. Various traditions, stereotypes, and female family members were targeted in an effort to win this religiously-charged battle. These harsh words were all part of the fun though, with the group members congratulating each other on their entertaining efforts at the end. The open freestyle round featured four impressive competitors. The title went to the defending champions, hip hop group BIU, who edged out the rest of competitors with the loudest crowd response. BIU member Chris Bostick '06 said his group "just wanted to have fun." The victory for BIU makes them repeat victors. Bostick went on to add that BIU's work was all original, with the group coming up with their own beats and lyrics. BIU beat out another group, headlined by freshman Lawrence "LC" Charles. Like BIU, the song performed by Charles, Antoine Johnson, and Mitch Rob was an original cut. Both Johnson and Charles are working on self-produced albums due out next year. Cristina Gioioso '04, head organizer of the event, said "there was a great showing [considering] the weather." Despite the rain, all the seats were filled, with many audience members forced to stand in the back. Gioioso, who serves as Chair of Special Projects for the TCU Senate, went on to add that "all the student groups put in a lot of work and took [the event] very seriously." And while for Jumbo the elephant lost his battle, the financial aid fund and all the participants walked away winners when the evening was over.


The Setonian
News

Campus conservatives -- an oppressed minority?

The always colorful conservative commentator David Horowitz spoke at Tufts Thursday, partially in support of a proposed Academic Bill of Rights. The resolution, under consideration by the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate, would urge the University not to consider political orientation when making hiring decisions. This is a fair idea that should be implemented, even though there is little evidence of bias against conservative professors at Tufts. Using shaky research methods, Horowitz pointed to what he characterized as a bias in higher education hiring policies. In many schools, there are more registered Democrats than registered Republicans. A study of Tufts revealed similar findings (one Republican to 12 Democrats), but there were 84 unaffiliated faculty members. However unscientifically, Horowitz underscores something most students realize -- professors tend to be liberal. That does not indicate a vast left-wing conspiracy against conservative professors. The fact that faculty members tend to be liberal probably reflects the fact that academics in general tend to have liberal views. Horowitz believes a virtual blacklist exists against conservative professors. That claim is hard to believe, but the proposed "Academic Bill of Rights" would eliminate any doubt. In all but a few disciplines, political persuasion should not play any role in a hiring decision. In any case the effect on education of the perceived biases is questionable. Horowitz himself admitted the abundance of liberal faculty members probably has little effect on students. Most professors refrain from getting political in the classroom, and he said they usually have little impact on students' personal views. Horowitz trumpeted the right's battle cry that its views are stifled on college campuses nationwide, but these claims -- at least at Tufts -- seem wildly overblown. In a recent edition of the TCU Senate-funded conservative journal The Primary Source, Nicholas Boyd bemoaned the discrimination conservatives face. While the Source has a tradition of highlighting times when the Tufts community has been less than true to the principles of free and fair discussion, the bias is simply not at the level it claims. TCU Senate funds pay for events like the Horowitz speech, as well as the Source, and the University paid for former President George Bush's lecture. What is called for is a greater level of tolerance on both sides and a stronger commitment to the values of free speech. Time and time again on this campus the left is willing to cross the line in the promotion of its message, while doing everything possible to censor speech it does not agree with. All too often the right makes mountains out of molehills, and seems to forget that the majority of this campus disagrees with it. Basic fairness and respect should pervade University policy with regard to these issues, and in some cases Tufts has room for improvement. Approving this "Bill of Academic Rights" would be a symbolic but important step towards affirming Tufts' commitment to diversity of thought.


The Setonian
News

Light on the Hill Award recipient selected

Nick Birnback (LA '92) will be this year's recipient for TCU Senate's annual Light on the Hill Award. Birnback has worked for many years with the United Nations, and has worked in countries from Ethiopia to East Timor. Birnback accepted the nomination this week, (TCU) President Chike Aguh said, but is still waiting for permission from the United Nations to accept the award. Upon graduating from Tufts with a B.A. in International Relations, Birnback received his Masters degree from Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University. He subsequently served as an officer with the United Nations (U.N.) peace missions centered in Ethiopia and Eritrea. Among other positions held with the United Nations, Birnback served as external relations officer at the Electoral Assistance Division (EAD) at the U.N. Headquarters, acting spokesman and officer-in-charge with the U.N. mission in East Timor and press officer with the United Nations in Liberia, according to the EPIIC website. Birnback is currently a political officer with the Asia/Middle East Division of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations' Office at U.N. Headquarters. "Nick Birnback was chosen for this award because of his exemplary service in the United Nations and his continued devotion to the University," Aguh said. "He is the ultimate embodiment of the global citizenship that Tufts values." According to Aguh, The Light on the Hill Award is given each year to a Tufts alum "that has done great service to Tufts and made exemplary achievement in the world." A tradition started at Tufts in the early 1990s, the Light on the Hill Award is the highest honor the student body bestows upon an alumnus or alumna each year. Director of Alumni Relations Tim Brooks said that "[the award] was and continues to be an entirely student-run program." Although Alumni Relations has been asked by the TCU Senate to recommend alumni for the award in the past, Brooks said that was not the case this year. It is not yet clear when Birnback will be on campus to receive the award. Aguh said the ceremony will be held either at the end of this year or during next year's fall term. Past recipients have included the current governor of New Mexico and four-time Nobel Peace Prize nominee Bill Richardson (LA '70), "Simpsons" character voice and actor Hank Azaria (LA '87), U.S. Astronaut Hall of Fame member Rick Hauck (LA '62) and five-time Emmy Award-winning television producer and writer Rob Burnett (LA '84).


Trending
The Tufts Daily Crossword with an image of a crossword puzzle
The Print Edition
Tufts Daily front page