Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Tainted goods: corporate gifts sometimes come with conditions

In the wake of recent state budget cuts and a faltering economy, corporate support may become increasingly important to Tufts' financial security. As gifts from businesses often come with strings attached, some observers are worrying that universities around the nation are sacrificing intellectual freedom for a piece of the corporate pie. Corporations direct their gifts toward a number of projects at Tufts, including undergraduate financial aid, construction and renovation. The bulk of the funds, though, are concentrated on supporting faculty research and specific educational programs. The schools of engineering, medicine, and dentistry receive most of the corporate funding due to the possibilities for profits arising from patents and licenses. At the graduate schools, corporations often set up clinical trials and testing agreements to further both academic and financial goals. The medical school frequently receives corporate support, and firms are currently funding research to develop a vaccine for the Epstein-Barr virus and drugs for Type II diabetes. At the Human Nutrition Research Center, several companies are currently sponsoring research on micronutrients and phytochemicals. Tufts' Veterinary School currently receives sponsorship from biotech companies interested in animal health, but it may be forced to seek a larger proportion of its budget from corporations after it recently lost $3.6 million in state funds. Businesses fund over $170 million worth of university research per year in New England alone, according to a recent article in Connection, the journal of the New England Board of Higher Education. The fruits of partnership between businesses and universities are sometimes quite juicy. At Boston College, marketing professor Bert Mendelsohn worked with Joe Crugnale, owner of the pizzeria chain Bertucci's, to improve the businesses' revenues as part of a class project. The market research that Mendelsohn's students conducted helped Bertucci's develop into a $103 million business, Connection reported. But some observers find such agreements to be troubling. "There's been a drift from philanthropy into marketing [in higher education]," said Gary Ruskin of Commercial Alert, a nonprofit organization dedicated to keeping "the commercial culture within its proper sphere," according to its website. "Only philanthropy" is an appropriate relationship between businesses and educational institutions, Ruskin told Connection. Yet corporate support may become even more important due to cuts in the state and federal education budgets. Other Massachusetts schools, particularly the large research universities, are already earning millions from partnerships with businesses. The University of Massachusetts, which has suffered greatly from the recent state budget cuts, brought in almost $15 million in technology licenses and royalties during fiscal year 2002. But because businesses sometimes ask for more than just recognition in return for their gifts, corporate gifts sometimes come with stipulations, such as in the agreement between the University of Kentucky and Nike. Nike has reserved the right to terminate the $25 million deal if "the University disparages the Nike brand," Connection reported. Such agreements can have real effects on student life and intellectual freedom at colleges and universities. At Kent State, a student chapter of Amnesty International has been repeatedly denied funding because the group criticizes Coca-Cola, a company that sponsors the university. At Tufts, university officials are careful not to sacrifice academic freedom in exchange for corporate sponsorship, according to Nina Green, director of the Office of Technology Transfer. The standard agreement between researchers and businesses sponsoring research at Tufts grants companies the ability to negotiate a license or patent for inventions that are produced, while the university retains publishing rights, Green said. "We won't sign anything that would prohibit us from publishing freely," Green said. "That's the number one policy rule." Most research agreements take place in labs where there are at least four or five people to perform the research. Some undergraduates -- especially engineers -- get a chance to work on research sponsored by businesses. In the Mechanical Engineering Department, Professor Chris Rogers works with a number of corporations, including LEGO, Steinway & Sons, Selmer Instruments, Intel, and Cabot. "There are a ton of students -- almost all undergraduates -- that are involved" in the project with LEGO, Rogers said in an e-mail. Rogers' work with LEGO has led the Engineering School to develop new courses and involves engineering students with local communities, where they work with elementary school teachers and parents. The research also has an international aspect: over a million children a year use the software Rogers helped develop, which has been translated into over 14 languages. Rogers also works with Steinway & Sons and Selmer Instruments, which finance the purchase of equipment for the Musical Instrument Engineering Program, a project that studies the mechanics of constructing musical instruments. The program has brought together students and professors with interests in fluid mechanics, acoustics, material engineering, and music composition. Tufts often relies on existing connections to attract support from corporations. The University publicizes its strengths in areas of interest to businesses and often works with Tufts alumni, according to Assistant Director of Public Relations Siobhan Houton. In recent years, Raytheon, Intel, DuPont, Hewlett-Packard, Roche Vitamins, and Kraft General Foods have all made gifts to the University, Houton said.


The Setonian
News

Local boys make good

Ellipsis is a Boston-based jazz quartet hailing from the New England Conservatory of Music. Formerly known as Mike Sempert and Ellipsis, the group seems to have created its own signature sound by experimenting with all types of musical influences, from Latin music to reggae to the more typical jazz. Ellipsis' latest album, titled Object on a Train, attempts to capture its own unique flavor of music by incorporating elements of all sorts of music into a combination of jazz and modern freeform pieces. The group has plenty of connections across the Boston area. Two members of the band, pianist Mike Sempert and saxophonist Daniel Blake, are enrolled in the Conservatory's double-degree program with Tufts University. Along with bassist Noah Jarrett, the group is joined for this album by Brent Raskind on drums and proceeds to experiment with all types of different genres, from jazz and beyond. Drawing its inspiration from across the musical spectrum, Ellipsis comes back to the basics again and again with its simple melodies and underlying harmonies. The album opens with "Spanda," a short number that sounds like it came right out of the space age and does little more than establish a laidback, freeform atmosphere for the rest of the album. It transitions quickly into "A New Day is Vibrating," the first real piece of the collection. Featuring Sempert on the electric piano and Blake on saxophone, "A New Day" showcases Ellipsis's signature relaxing sound. With the bass and drumset creating an easy harmonious atmosphere, Sempert and Blake are free to improvise with the melody and enhance it through their own interpretations over the course of the number. The opening of "Mushmouth," the third song on the album, returns to the more modern-feeling freeform before moving into the actual piece. Again, the melody is established early on, this time by saxophone and bass, and then elaborated upon for the rest of the piece with improvisation. The band's musical talent is more than evident here as its ability to expand upon the simplest of themes creates an energy that carries the piece through to its end. A couple of short freeform interludes bring the listener to "Melting the Robots," a piece that starts out with Ellipsis's signature relaxed feel, this time augmented by a futuristic sounding piano line that develops into a more lively number. Once again, the band manages to capture the energy that only good improv can create as the song transitions almost directly into "The Sweet," another longer number that opens with a salsa flavor. This piece gives Blake an opportunity to truly shine on saxophone and demonstrates the band's diverse musical influences. The second half of the album features more freeform tracks with a smattering of more traditional jazz pieces. Notable among them are "Feeling Clean," a shorter number with a lively melody, and "Travels of a Flying Fox Carp," the collection's final piece that essentially sums up the journey by both returning to the basics and incorporating elements of freestyle jazz before it fades away one last time. Overall, Object on a Train is a unique musical experience. While the freeform episodes can be distracting at first, especially for someone who doesn't typically listen to such modern music, they build along with the CD, eventually coalescing to the point where they become something to which the listener can look forward. While this sort of experimentation rarely pays off in its final form, Ellipsis carries it through to great success, essentially getting better as they go along. The collection is great for fans of jazz and easy listening music and offers a unique take on the usual jazz experience.


The Setonian
News

Truth in advertising

I have a 24-pack of Charmin double-roll toilet paper stocked away in the bathroom. In theory, the double-roll variety should last twice as long and save me the trouble of having to replace the roll every two days. This, of course, does not happen, and so I find myself digging into the cabinet time and again to get out yet another roll to satisfy my house's insatiable appetite for tissue. And what do I see every time? A goddamn baby. They've plastered every side of my Charmin 24-pack with the face of some drooling infant. Babies are wonderful things, I suppose, especially when you've had the nine months of anticipation and inconvenience beforehand. But I don't have a baby. I don't want a baby. And to hit the crux of the problem, I don't feel the need to think about babies every time I go to the bathroom. My toilet paper isn't used for any baby-related activities. My Charmin has nothing to do with babies at all. So why should there be babies on the package? Go ahead, trot out the "soft as a baby's bottom" argument. I don't see Hanes putting pictures of babies on packages of undershirts or socks in an attempt to let us know that cotton is soft, too. And what about facial tissues? I think they should be even softer than toilet paper, but there aren't any babies on those boxes. So here I am, an unmarried, twentysomething man, and the best that the Charmin marketing department can come up with is an anonymous, androgynous baby? What happened to logical advertising? And if we're going to be illogical, what happened to "sex sells" and women in bikinis? I'd think that would capture a bigger section of the young, male, toilet-using segment of the population. To me, babies are neutral at best, but 100 million Victoria's Secret readers can tell you that skimpy outfits are overwhelmingly positive. There's nothing wrong with this, of course. Probably a lot of people associate babies with soft cuddliness, and the babies don't offend me. But when was the last time that you looked at a package of toilet paper and really thought about the imagery that you saw there? Or at anything else? Why should a giant, anthropomorphic tiger make you want to eat cereal? Sure, advertising works in odd ways, but it's also so ubiquitous that you stop questioning it. I think you need to keep questioning it. It's fun, and it keeps your mind sharp. It never hurts to be more aware of your environment, to be more conscious of the reasons and assumptions behind everyday life. And, to reiterate, it can be pretty amusing. And the corporate imagery out there gets ridiculous at times. Why should a talking bear with curly, white fur convince you that a certain brand of fabric softener is particularly effective? Was no one else terrified of Snuggle when they were younger? Maybe Snuggle (the company, not the bear) should wise up to the fact that Snuggle (the bear, not the company) has prevented me from buying their product, possibly forever. People respond well to repeated themes and imagery. Ad campaigns are just that _ campaigns, rather than standalone spots. "Can you hear me now?" "True." "Kid-Tested, Mother-Approved!" Slogans, logos, voices, music, even colors _ they all reinforce your memory of the product and company. It's just entertaining to recognize the ridiculous ways that advertisers do it sometimes. Want more nonsensical advertising? Here's some homework for you. Go buy a box of Wheaties (be sure to pick your favorite athlete-emblazoned box, because you're probably going to stop eating it and then hang on to the half-eaten box for six months or so). Open the box flaps and you'll find a nice blue-on-yellow message from the people at General Mills: "YOU BETTER EAT YOUR WHEATIES!" So what is General Mills trying to do here? You've already purchased the box of Wheaties, right? Convincing you of the value and necessity of Wheaties should be irrelevant. And if you're just some crank who opens boxes of cereal in the supermarket and eats them for free, this will only encourage you further _ a real concern when you clearly steal and eat Wheaties compulsively anyway. Sure, there's nothing wrong with it _ I doubt that many people get upset at being told by their cereal to eat their cereal. Maybe they should. But name recognition is the first step towards success, and advertisers know it. Reminding people that they are eating Wheaties and reinforcing that idea with a snappy, uninventive slogan can only help sales. And considering that General Mills relies on professional golfers to hawk Wheaties (and that Wheaties are overrated anyway). I guess any help is valuable. Cereal boxes are funny things, anyway. The back of the Cocoa Puffs box hasn't changed in at least five years; Cinnamon Life has resorted to a long line of gap-toothed urchins; Quaker Oatmeal keeps changing around the box design for no apparent reason. But keep your eyes open for the funny little things. The little fruits on Fruit of the Loom clothing? The smiley-face sun on Raisin Bran? The sphere-headed man on Bic pens _ especially the more detailed version that's on the boxes? Don't forget how much money corporations spend on graphic design, logo design, name design. And then people spend their lives ignoring all the hard work that these poor, forgotten designers put in. I'm sure making distinctive products helps sales and customer loyalty, but the entertainment value is worth far more to me. I just hope that I never start seeing babies on my cereal boxes.


The Setonian
News

Columbia U. Law students win Moot Court competition

"I am an innocent lost in a field of giants," winner Erika Evasdottir said after Sunday's final round of a Moot Court competition held at Tufts this weekend. Seventy law students from 12 universities around New York came to the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy over the weekend to debate international law at the 44th annual Philip C. Jessup Moot Court Atlantic Regional Competition. The Moot Court competition is based on the process of the International Court Justice system in The Hague, Netherlands. In September, each of the teams was given a hypothetical court case, and by January they were required to file a 35-page memorial in defense of both sides. Over the weekend, the teams presented oral arguments to support their brief. According to the Moot Court press release, this year's topic "deals with the aftermath of a [fictitious] brutal civil war that resulted in the founding of two states. Students will debate whether widespread and systematic rape is a war crime, whether sexual slavery and corruption are unlawful under international law, and the obligations and rights of states to prosecute those responsible for such acts." Some of the issues surrounding the topic are international jurisdiction and crimes against humanity. The topic forced students to consider the ramifications of many current issues and to base their arguments on solid legal grounds. "This is a novel area with many pitfalls," said attorney Dia Warren, one of the judges at the competition. "One of the challenges of the case is that it is a fact putter and participants have to argue both pro and con. This makes it very interesting to watch [students] dance around their interpretation of the law," Warren said. The winner of the competition was Erika Evasdottir, a first year law student at Columbia University. Evasdottir and her teammate, Kathy Wilhelm, defeated the New York University team in the final round. One of the keys to her success, Evasdottir said, is the "idea of thinking through the other team's argument to parry the other side." The group of 38 judges included distinguished law professors, practicing lawyers, public servants, and other international law experts. Two of the most notable guests were Dr. Gabor Horvath, Ambassador General of the Republic of Hungary, and Detlev Vagts, Professor of International Law at Harvard, who judged Sunday's final rounds. According to participants, one of the most exciting aspects of the debate was being forced to think on their feet while judges were allowed to interrupt and question speakers at any point during their presentation. Wilhem said that at some points, she craved the opportunity to take questions from judges, just "to check to see if they were on the same page." Many of the students cited the extremely useful legal experience of attending Moot Court as the main reason for their participation. "This is probably the best way to help our careers," one NYU law student said. "It's better than learning some abstract material in a classroom." The students also mentioned that participating is a good way of networking with established alumni of the event. Host schools are not allowed to participate in their own competition, so they are given the option of debating in the regional competition of their choosing. The Fletcher team just returned from a competition last weekend in Memphis, TN. The team placed fourth for its memorial, or legal brief, and is still awaiting the official results. The Fletcher team was able to watch debates without having to participate. "It's more fun to watch and there's less pressure," team member Marti Flacks said. "It's interesting to see new angles and perspectives." Although Tufts does not have a law school, the Fletcher team is still able to participate at the level of other universities, Flacks said. "It is gratifying to see that we can hold our own against people who have been taught skills on how to argue and prepare written briefs," she said. "The Jessup competition is the largest law school event and one of the most important of the year," Regional Administrator Adrineh Gregorian said. "We are very honored to be hosting this event with such a prestigious list of schools," she said. Participants were satisfied by the job of their Fletcher hosts. "They did a great job of getting judges who are experts in international law and it's been a great learning experience for us," one student from NYU said. The 12 regional winning teams will move on to the international rounds, which are scheduled to take place in Washington, DC next month. Harvard Law School will defend its title as 2002 US champion.


The Setonian
News

Pair of Wildcats clawing their way to the top in college hoops

The Arizona Wildcats and the Kentucky Wildcats are distancing themselves from the rest of the teams in college basketball. At this point, they seem to be the only two teams that are locked for number one seeds in the NCAA Tournament, but there is a pack of teams trying to claim the remaining two spots. Here is a run-through of all the teams at the top of the selection committee's lists (By the way, for these teams it is not a question of whether or not they will get in, but just how high a seed they will receive and in which region.): Arizona has been everyone's number one all year long. They were the preseason number one and they will most likely be number one in the polls in the final week before the tournament begins. The Wildcats have been close to perfect this year making all of their key shots during clutch moments of games, with the exception of two slipups against the LSU Tigers in Louisiana, and at home to the Stanford Cardinals. Luke Walton's return from injury has helped this team cut right through their PAC-10 opposition. Saturday night's 72-69 victory over previously 19th ranked Stanford helped to avenge the Wildcats' earlier season loss to their conference rival. This win clinched the regular season PAC-10 title for Arizona, and showcased its dominance over its league and the rest of the nation. Without question, Arizona's blend of talent, youth, and experience makes it the team to beat in this year's tournament. The other Wildcats in Lexington, Kentucky have also been playing great ball as of late. They hold the nation's longest current winning streak with victories in 18 straight games. Their domination over the newly appointed number one Florida Gators proved that they are for real, as has their undefeated record in SEC play. Kentucky still remains the best team in the state of Kentucky after the Louisville Cardinals' recent string of three straight losses and fall from the top ten. Kentucky was again tested on Sunday against the ranked Georgia Bulldogs, coming out on top 74-66 in the highly touted SEC match-up. The Oklahoma Sooners of the Big 12 are also primed for a number one seed provided they do not suffer any bad losses in the next week and are able to get deep into their own conference tournament. Lead by senior guard Hollis Price and the team's experience, the Sooners have a good chance to shine in the NCAA tournament. Although they suffered a conference loss to the Missouri Tigers, losses suffered by other teams in the top ten negate that defeat. Senior forward Matt Bonner has helped the Florida Gators stay atop the polls, even after their one week debacle as the nation's number one team. The strong mix of underclassmen stars Matt Walsh, David Lee, and Anthony Roberson combined with seniors Bonner, Justin Hamilton, and Brett Nelson will help lead this potential number one seed far into March Madness. The Duke Blue Devils have rebounded nicely since their four straight ACC road defeats to pull within one game of the conference lead behind the Wake Forrest Demon Deacons. Throughout the course of their late season stretch, the Devils have found a balance of inside and out play with the emergence of freshman Shelden Williams as a legitimate scoring threat and rebound machine. With their 72-71 loss to the mediocre St. John's Red Storm on Sunday at Madison Square Garden, the Devils most likely squashed whatever chance they had at a number one seed. However, this probable number two seed will be very dangerous as this young team gains more and more experience. It may not be their year, but Duke is most certainly going to dominate once again in the near future. Another team near the top of the Big 12 mix are the Texas Longhorns lead by sophomore point guard sensation T.J. Ford. If the Sooners and the Gators collapse during the final two weeks of the season, look for Texas to sneak in to grab the last number one seed. The Kansas Jayhawks could be a final four contending team, as most analysts say they have the best starting five in college basketball. Yet after regaining power forward Wayne Simien from an early season injury, the Jayhawks will lose the bruiser for the rest of the year. Simien dislocated his previously injured right shoulder in the 1st half of dominating 84-45 win over the Texas A&M Aggies. Even without Simien, Kansas was able to defeat the Oklahoma State Cowboys, a highly ranked conference foe, 79-61 on Saturday's Senior Day in Lawrence, Kansas. Seniors Kirk Heinrich and Nick Collison still form a great inside-outside duo and should carry the Jayhawks far as a number two or three seed. The Big East is loaded with a number of teams at the top of the conference that could earn high seeds in the NCAA Tournament. Whichever of the Pittsburgh Panthers, the Notre Dame Fighting Irish, and the Syracuse Orangemen is the most consistent over the next two weeks, or is able to win the Big East tournament, is most likely to earn a number two seed in one of the regions. The Illinois Fighting Illini and the Wisconsin Badgers are atop the Big 10 and are also in line to earn some of the higher seeds in the tournament.


The Setonian
News

Oscar dominates Turner Classic Movies

One channel, one month, 346 movies. No, it's not TUTV. That would be one channel, one semester, five movies. It's Turner Classic Movies, and the network is celebrating the 75th Anniversary of the Academy Awards with "31 Days of Oscar." For the entire month of March, TCM is showing all Oscar-nominated or Oscar-winning pictures, all of them run without commercial interruption, uncensored, and uncut. From West Side Story to Fiddler on the Roof -- The Philadelphia Story to Philadelphia, this marathon of classic movies promises to make for 31 blockbuster evenings, without ever having to go to Blockbuster. Instead of showing the movies in chronological order, TCM has wisely chosen to group the films by theme, such as or "Oscar Gets Directions" airing on Mar. 5, or "Oscar Joins the Military," airing on Mar. 7. The former theme offers the unique pairing of the Hitchock thriller North by Northwest with Leonard Bernstein's classic musical West Side Story. While the only real connection these two movies have is the title, the latter theme groups war movies like the Robin Williams drama, Good Morning Vietnam, and the Gary Cooper biopic, Sergeant York. "Oscar Joins the Military" is the first in a series of days with a war theme, and it is followed by 'Oscar Goes to Battle" and "Oscar Comes Home from War," airing on Mar. 8 and 9, respectively. TCM has scheduled similar stretches of movie genres, including three days of films pertaining to law and order. Be sure to watch Bonnie & Clyde starring Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway in a great crime movie on March 10. The tagline "They are young, they are in love, they kill people," does enough justice (pun intended) in describing the movie. The following night, as a part of "Oscar Goes to Court," features the rarely seen Jeremy Irons in his Oscar-winning performance in Reversal of Fortune, as well as one of the best dramas ever, 12 Angry Men. On "Oscar Goes to Prison" on March 11, one of my personal favorites premieres, The Great Escape. It stars Mr. Cool himself, Steve McQueen, as well as Charles Bronson, James Garner, the late great James Coburn, and a young Richard Attenborough, recently of Jurassic Park fame, all as World War II soldiers who expend all their efforts to escaping from a Nazi POW camp. Yet the day to look forward to the most is Mar. 17, with "Oscar Gets Hot," as TCM presents two hilarious comedies: Blazing Saddles and Some Like it Hot, one inspirational drama, Chariots of Fire, and one tribute to the recently-deceased Rod Steiger, in his greatest role as a racist sheriff in In the Heat of the Night. According to the American Film Institute's list of the "100 Greatest Comedies," Some Like it Hot is the funniest movie of all-time. Anyone who has seen it would have a hard time arguing, as it stars Jack Lemmon and Tony Curtis as two musicians who mistakenly witness the St. Valentine's Day Massacre. To avoid the mob, they go on the lam dressed as female musicians in a band led by the luscious Marilyn Monroe. Hilarity ensues. Blazing Saddles is listed seventh on the aforementioned list, and if you like flatulence jokes, make sure you watch. If not, go find a sense of humor. Mar. 23 is Academy Awards Night on ABC, and you can watch the Rivers women critique the fashion scene, or you can watch Bogart and Bergman light up the screen in Casablanca on TCM. The 1941masterpiece is one of the rare near-perfect movies, and is deserving of all the praised heaped upon it year after year. To keep up with the impressive counter-programming, the network is showing Annie Hall, a great Woody Allen comedy about his relationship with the film's namesake, played by Diane Keaton. The odds-on favorite for this year's Best Picture award is Chicago, the jazzy movie musical directed by Rob Marshall based on the Kander & Ebb Broadway hit. During the "31 Days," TCM celebrates the success of similar movie musicals throughout Oscar history. On Mar. 20, "Oscar Goes Dancing" with An American in Paris and 42nd Street, two of the first musicals to be recognized by the academy. The Rat Pack vehicle Guys and Dolls premieres on Mar. 16 as a part of the "Oscar Goes Gambling" theme. If you want to see the precedence for an Oscar-caliper musical, make sure to tune into these melodious movies. TCM's programming is not perfect by any means, as I fail to see the point of showing one of the greatest movies of all time, Citizen Kane, at 1 a.m. In addition, where are The Godfather films? Star Wars series? Any animated films? The final few days of movies are also busts, as I am left to wonder, is Beetlejuice really worthy of being placed on the same schedule as these other great classics? Regardless, anyone looking for a crash course in the great American movies of the past 75 years, definitely should look at TCM's "31 Days of Oscar". You won't find a better selection at our local Blockbuster, or any other station. For the best, you have to look toward TCM.



The Setonian
News

Sense and violence

Eve Ensler has dedicated a large part of her life to ending violence against women. There are very few causes more important. Ensler believes that her play, The Vagina Monologues, is one of the best tools towards ending such violence. Is she right? Violence is inflicted on a person either by himself or herself or by someone else. That someone else can either be a woman or a man. So we have three potential sources for violence against women. Let's look at them and how Ensler's Monologues respond. A woman's violence against herself is heart-rending. Whether it takes the form of an eating disorder, exercise-mania, or self-mutilation, it is a horror that should never have to happen. When it does happen it is usually because the woman is surrounded by at least two lies. The first lie is that no one loves her simply for who she is, and not what she can do or provide. It is this lie that denies unconditional love, and the lonelier a person becomes the more this lie seems to be true. It becomes easier to forget that there can be people out there who will love unconditionally and that for everyone there must be at least one: whoever is ultimately responsible for your existence. You didn't have to exist, to be born, but someone somewhere, loved you enough that they thought you should be born. The second lie, somewhat related, is that "you are worthless unless you look like this." The prevalence of a certain kind of image in our media preys upon human nature's natural vanity and convinces some women that they must look a certain way. I once read a sad comment from a woman that, "if fat were beautiful," women would be competing against each other in devouring ice cream cartons. It is troubling that so many have been convinced to pursue the appearance of "health" (whatever the magazines say it is) rather than true health for whatever one's body might be. Such a concentration on looks still does less physical harm on the body than it does spiritual harm on one's identity. The glossy photos of our models isolate one aspect of a woman (her body) at the expense of all the others (like her character). With her character thus neglected, some women perceive that their characters do not matter at all. This is not to say that admiration of beauty is in itself destructive. It is no coincidence that the most powerful artwork of beautiful women is also the most "soulful." But today's media images sever body from soul, wrecking both. Ensler's first monologues rightly proclaim the truth that a woman's body is not an object of disgust. There is nothing "dirty" or worthless about it. But by the end of the play, her body is still nothing more than an object! Ensler presents the very center of a woman's identity to be not her self, but her vagina: "I am my vagina." This simply continues the violent separation of body and soul. Reducing a man to essentially be his genitals is one of our most effective insults. Reducing a woman to no more than her vagina is, apparently, a form of highest praise. As for violence to women by other women, although recent studies confirm that, "within the hidden culture of aggression, girls fight [their own friends] with body language and relationships instead of fists and knives," Ensler does not address this (Girls just want to be mean," The New York Times, Feb. 24, 2002). On the contrary, even when a 20-something woman seduces a 13-year-old girl in one monologue, this encounter of violence against innocence is praised: "if it was a rape, it was a good rape." Ensler's later monologues focus instead on the third source of violence: men. Ensler would not have produced these monologues, presumably, if she hadn't thought she could change the attitudes of men towards women. The effectiveness of her play to end violence against women stands or falls on this. So our first question must be, who are the men in the audience? When we get right down to it, there are really only two sorts of men. There are men to whom women are nothing more than fuel for fantasy, a means to an end. These take the soulless photos of women into their minds to make the bodies do what the souls would never consent to. Now in what way will their respect for women increase by imagining vaginas with feather boas or hearing 31 varieties of ecstatic screams? Ensler's play doesn't say. There are, of course, other men who are making an honest try (with varied success), in the face of what's around them and within them, to treat women with respect, loving them for who they are and not what they can provide. What message do they leave with when the hero of the play is a lecher who can't stop staring at a vagina? The 'hero' does not see a woman, he sees a vagina. The woman in the monologue thought she was being worshipped. She was really only being used. Is that how men are to approach women? The second sort of men remain confused. A defense often made for the Monologues' extremely sexually charged scenes is that they're meant to show that, "women enjoy sex just as much, if not more, than men." Well, I'd be rather surprised if they didn't. Pleasure is not an accidental property of sex, but was intentionally designed to arise naturally out of the union of two people's whole selves. Unfortunately, when a woman says, "women enjoy sex as much as men," there are men who take that to mean, "women enjoy sexual perversion as much as men." We have a perfect case study in these very pages. On Feb. 20, "Scared to experiment" writes to Ask Angie in the Daily for advice on her boyfriend's proposal for a "m?©nage-a-trios." How is growing "comfortable" with screaming "vagina" in a theatre going to change this boyfriend's violent ways? How is it going to change the mind of this woman, seriously considering giving in to them? I can understand Ensler's desire that women not appear "prudish" -- but the accusations of prudishness are coming from the fellows who want third partners! Must women really have to accept the label of "prudes" if they believe sexual love should be shared only by the two people actually in love? What has happened? We have given men free license to "affirm" the value not of women but of "vaginas" as such, and they've grabbed the ball and run with it. Is this success? Ensler apparently believed she could "out-sex" men. That by turning female sexuality into a circus romp women could "level the playing field" and "win" respect. This liberation has had only the opposite effect. How do I know these things? Just who am I, anyway? I am no different from other men. I knew well the regime of Maxim's and Internet filth. I am a defector; I am no innocent refugee. I deserved Nuremberg. What I got was something closer to Tutu's Truth and Reconciliation, so how can I not speak out? The truth is that Lust is a tyrannical dictator. "Lust" is not the "crime of thinking sex is good." It is the crime of thinking that sexual pleasure is the only good. For it inevitably leads to the belief that the only good sexual pleasure is your own. Thus we see girlfriends who wouldn't "give it up" and husbands who don't "meet needs" discarded. Lust's weapons of choice are lies, manipulation, and greed. We see the mass destruction all around us. No negotiations are possible. You can't educate it. And sanctions, as any man will tell you, are futile, and usually do more harm. (There is a rumor floating that there is Someone who can dethrone Lust. It cost him his life two thousand years ago, but now He can intervene anywhere, so the story goes). Whatever will stop men's violence against women, it does not appear to be the pitting of woman against man in sexual warfare. It will take a powerful force to stop the violence, but a force we have actually seen in "Scared to Experiment" herself. What could possibly motivate her to go against all natural tendencies and desires, at the expense of her own health and well-being? In her words: "I want him to be happy." In other words: unconditional love. As much as we want to scold our friends who continue to allow significant others to push them around, our friends are only doing what comes naturally to anyone in love: sacrificing themselves for the other. The major problem, of course, is that our friends don't expect the same from their partner and their partner doesn't know what real love is. The way to end men's violence against women, then, is not to portray men as weak and ignorant, but to call them out to love women as they would love themselves. Women should demand such treatment as they give it. They should keep men in line not by shouting them down but by maintaining their own modesty, in the strong, self-preservative sense of that word. Men should know that a woman's sexuality is to be respected as an extremely personal, private, and valuable part of who she is. Women should make it clear to men not that they have vaginas -- men know this already -- but that they will share them with one and only one person: the man who will love them for life.


The Setonian
News

Toni Smith has the right idea

Michael Jordan hasn't done it. Tiger Woods hasn't done it. Brett Farve, Barry Bonds, Andre Agassi, Mia Ham and the Williams sisters all haven't done it either. In fact, with the exception of the Dallas Mavericks' Steve Nash, who wore an anti-war T-shirt to his interview session at all-star weekend, no high profile athlete has spoken out or taken a stand against the potential war in Iraq. However, on a small liberal arts campus in Purchase, NY, Toni Smith, a senior basketball player at Manhattenville College, is doing it. And hopefully, professional athletes will follow the lead of this brave 21-year-old. All season Smith has turned 90 degrees away from the flag as the National Anthem is played. Though she had been doing it all season, the gesture took on national significance when it was reported in the Feb. 12 edition of Newsday. Since then, newspapers and regular citizens have been weighing in on the great Toni Smith debate. Much of what is being said about Smith is negative. Some say that she is acting as an individual rather than as a teammate. Others say that the athletic arena is not a forum for political protest. And still others say that she is disrespecting her country. Dan Patrick, the noted ESPN Sportcenter anchor who hosts his own radio show and pens his own column went so far as to say, "It's one thing to voice an opinion, but it's completely different to turn your back -- literally, not figuratively. In turning her back on the American flag, Smith is doing more than making her point_she is rejecting everything the flag and this country represent." Whoa there Dan, settle down boy. Smith is doing no such thing. Rather she is embodying everything that is good about this country. This is not Iraq, or Cuba, or China or North Korea -- Smith is allowed to disagree with the government and she is allowed to do so publicly. The First Amendment of the Bill of Rights gives her that right. Smith is rejecting George W. and objecting to war with Iraq. What is so anti-American about that? We should support a war just because Bush and his gun-toting band of merry men say we should? Have we been so brainwashed that when a woman chooses to make a statement about an unjust war and an ignorant administration, we immediately label her anti-American? She disagrees with Bush's policies and she is opposed to war in Iraq and instead of standing silently and conforming to societal pressure and government propaganda, Smith has chosen to make a silent stand for what she believes in. She is not hurting anyone, she is not demanding that others follow her lead, and her team is not suffering, as demonstrated by its 17-10 record. And Smith is not, and should not be, alone in her anti-Bush, anti-war stance. According to The New York Times ("A Stalwart of Certainty: Bush Undeterred on Iraq," March 2), "The political and logistical obstacles to realizing President Bush's goal of ousting Saddam Hussein within weeks seem to keep mounting... And yet Mr. Bush not only sounds more certain than ever that he is about to lead the United States into war -- he also talks almost as if Mr. [Saddam] Hussein has already been deposed." George W. is doing this despite the fact that France, Germany, Russia, Turkey and the Arab League do not support him. Neither do the millions of people who assembled in the US and abroad on Feb. 15 for the world wide day of protest against war in Iraq. When the United States decided to overthrow Britain in 1776, Thomas Jefferson wrote a little something called The Declaration of Independence. In that document, it is said that "...Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government." The United States is a member of an international body called the United Nations, which has not given its consent for war. George W. is not deriving his "just Powers from the Consent of the Governed," rather he is hell bent on war and is ignoring the international community which opposes it. So following this logic, George W. should be ostracized or removed from the international community. By facing away from the flag during the National Anthem, Smith is expressing what so many Americans are too afraid or too ignorant to express, namely anti-war sentiments. Athletes and public figures should be leading the way in speaking out against a war that George W. clearly intends to fight, because their voices are far more influential than the voices of the Toni Smiths of the world. While Michael Jordan, Tiger Woods and so many other athletes are afraid to come out and make political statements for fear of destroying their public personas and costing them millions in endorsements, Toni Smith like Muhammad Ali, during the Vietnam War, is not. Ali went so far as to go to jail rather than enlist in the army. According to Jerry Kiley, a Vietnam veteran, who was ejected from the a game on Feb. 23 after coming onto the court and holding an American flag in Smith's face, "She disgraced herself and she disgraced the flag." If anybody is disgracing the flag it is George W. He is putting America on shaky ground within the international community and believes that war is "plan A" rather than a last resort. On the other hand, Smith is a breath of fresh air -- a thoughtful person who is willing to stand up for what she believes in -- critics be damned. Because she chooses not to face the flag does not mean she does not love her country, or that she does not respect the millions of Americans who have died fighting for the United States. "I am aware that this is a time of fear for many Americans, and the media has done a fine job of maintaining that fear and riling up people's emotions," Smith said in a statement released to the press. "However, amidst this fear people have lost sight of the fact that Bush's plan for 'maintaining our safety' will cause innocent people, women and children, mothers and babies, to die overseas. Furthermore, going to war will likely provoke more violence in this country." It sure seems like Smith has been doing some thinking and what was initially a personal statement has now taken on national significance. We can only hope, that some of those professional athletes, who are too PR savvy to formulate opinions of their own, grow some marbles and follow the lead of a brave 21-year-old woman.


The Setonian
News

Women fare well at All-New England Championships

After competing as a team last week at the New England Div. III Championship meet, the women's track and field squad took a different tact this past weekend. A group of 14 Jumbos made the trip to Smith College, which hosted the All-New England Championships. Given the pared down Tufts contingent, the goal of those attending was not to compete as a team as much to achieve individual objectives. "We basically went for the relay and a few open events to get some qualifiers for NCAAs, ECACs, or to hit school records. It was a good meet for us," coach Kristen Morwick said. All four relay teams that raced -- 4x200, 4x400, 4x800, and the distance medley relay (DMR) -- finished within the top 12, with three of them speeding to season bests. Most notably, the 4x400 squad of sophomore Sika Henry, freshman Rachel Bloom, and juniors Emily Bersin and Jessica Trombly clocked an improved NCAA qualifying mark. Finishing fifth overall in 3:57.97, the 4x400 team put itself in eighth on the Nationals list in an event that took the top 10 fastest last year. The effort was also the second all time fastest indoor time in Tufts history. In a similar vein, the 4x800 crew came close to the school record in its weekend endeavor, ending just 2.5 seconds off the mark. Junior Katie Higley, freshman Daniela Fairchild, senior Danielle Perrin, and sophomore Katie Sheedy comprised the squad, which ran to a season best and posted the second fastest time on the Tufts all-time list. The time of 9:37.54 was good for 12th. The DMR squad also achieved a season best, as Perrin, Higley, Sheedy, and junior Lauren Caputo ran a PR of 12:26.85 that put the squad tenth in the meet and third on the Tufts all-time list. The time was a full 30 second improvement upon the effort put in last week. The DMR could square off against a higher caliber of competition at the upcoming ECAC Championship meet in an attempt to get further into the postseason. "If the same team runs next week, the DMR could very well qualify. It just depends whether it's better for individuals to go for their events or to go for the DMR," senior Ashley Peterson said. Though there were impressive accomplishments met by the relay teams, there were also individual feats that deserve recognition. Coming off an unparalleled performance in winning five events at Div. III's, Trombly did not disappoint this week. Chasing a record that has stood the test of time for 13 years, Trombly ran a blistering 56.47 in the 400 to claim the school record, previously held by Vera Stenhouse. The record time also gave Trombly an NCAA automatic qualifying time. In the mile run, Caputo scampered to a PR, vaulting herself to third on the Tufts All-Time list with her time of 5:13.51, which put her 13th overall in the race. Representing the sprints, Bloom dashed to a PR in the 200 in 26.31, garnering 11th place and missing out of the finals by three spots. "This weekend was the smallest amount of competitors we've taken to a meet. It was more a chance for the relays to get better times and to better qualifying marks," Peterson said. The upcoming ECAC Championship meet to be hosted at the Gantcher Center will be similar to the All-New England Championship but on a larger and more competitive scale. It will be a last chance for those looking to qualify for the indoor NCAA meet to get or better qualifying times. With the outdoor season starting in about two weeks, the ECAC will bring an official end to many on the indoor team. "It's a competitive and exciting meet for those who run in it. There are 90 teams and it's a big weekend, a great chance for those to have qualified to run against some fast people and try to get some fast times for the relays," Peterson said.


The Setonian
News

Voyeur roommates and cheating on exams

Q: Hey, this is kind of weird, but I think my roommate was looking at porn on her computer. That kind of thing doesn't really bother me usually but I was uncomfortable. I mean I'm not sure she was doing it. Should I even ask her? -- Virgin Eyes A: It's probably been eating at you, but I would advise against confronting her. You may end up bringing about a massive amount of embarrassment, regardless of whether or not she was actually doing the act in question. Since you're not even sure she was peeking at those sorts of pictures, it's quite possible she was looking at something inherently more artistic or even something medically related. The possibilities here are endless. Even if she was browsing some naughty material (and as long as she's 18-years-old or older there's nothing wrong with that), it may not be something she'd like to discuss with you. To avoid an uncomfortable situation, it may be best to assume she's innocent unless she's later proven guilty. If you catch her in the act again, and you're sure of what's going on, then it would be appropriate for you to express to her that looking at those kinds of things in your company makes you feel a bit weird. Q: Hi Angie, I was taking a test in one of my classes, and I saw my friend looking at my answers. I know he cheated off of me and then got a better grade on that test. I'm so pissed, he admits he did it but doesn't see what is wrong with it. I wish we never took a class together. What can I do? -- Hard Worker A: Situations like these suck in particular because your friend basically trampled on your bonds of trust. Although you might share your souls with each other outside of the classroom, test taking isn't a time to share at all. If you're willing to lose the friend, then perhaps you'd better tell your professor about his scandalous behavior. In this scenario, you've got to be prepared for not only losing a friend but a possible backlash due to harsh disciplinary actions taken against him. If that's not an option, then you need to have a serious discussion with him. Make sure he understands that in your world, you have a problem with him using you. As much as he might not care, you won't put up with it. You could even feed him the line, "I don't want either of us to get in trouble," which is probably the case. Definitely sit somewhere far away when the next test rolls around, and avoid taking classes with this friend. If your ideas of acceptable behavior clash in the classroom, then don't push your boundaries. Q: Angie, I'm a sophomore so I definitely have my experiences with roommates. I'm living with my friend this year and over the course of the past few months his side of the room has smelled worse and worse. It is so disgusting I want to gag when I walk in. So can I just tell him to take a shower, should I hire a maid or what? -- Nauseated A: Ugh. You know, you'd be surprised how common that phenomenon has become. It's the case of the smelly roommate. You lived together for a little while and things were going pretty well. Suddenly he's totally comfortable with you. There's no need to keep up appearances or impress each other. You're just being typical college guys, when suddenly "the smell" appears. At first it's not so bad. Maybe it's simply an amalgamation of dirty socks and moldy pizza crusts. As time goes on, the offensive odor builds up as the piles of gross stuff accumulate. You didn't mention it, but I'm going to assume that there are piles of gross stuff -- there's got to be a distinctive scientific correlation between sweaty socks and smelliness. If he's not showering, that definitely can't help. Being a good roommate is all about compromise and respect. It is incredibly disrespectful for him to provide you with such rancid living conditions. You have a right to confront him about this issue -- it's your room too! Offer to help him clean, or remind him to tidy up. Some people still can't clean up without a parental-type nag once in a while. Try not to bring up the smell, it might embarrass him. I'm sure he knows it's there. Ask what you can do to help him get his act together. If he's totally non-responsive, maybe you should bring an RA in to get through to him. No nasty accusations need to be made, but the RA's are there for this kind of encouraging mediation.


The Setonian
News

International students have different plans for different breaks

Most international students at Tufts return home for winter and summer breaks. Over spring break and other shorter vacations such as long weekends, however, many international students use their time off to travel throughout the States or discover other destinations in the world. According to International Center data, the University's international community this year is composed of 344 undergraduate students, 277 graduate students, and about 238 special graduate (Practical Training or Exchange) students. For these students, often separated from their families and homelands by thousands of miles, the most common way to spend winter break is to return home. "Winter Break is a special break," freshman Rana Shabb said. "It is a family gathering; it is also the time to see my friends again and to come back to my land, Lebanon." Junior Fleur du Pasquier was thrilled to return to France over the winter break. "At the beginning of the year, I had planned on staying in the States over break," du Pasquier said. "Since I am only here for one year, I wanted to take the most I could from this experience. But after one semester, I really felt I needed to go back home. And thanks to this pause, I am even more enjoying my second semester back here." Though most international students describe themselves as integrated and happy on campus, they still consider their native countries "home." Freshman Irem Ayaz went back to Istanbul, Turkey over break and enjoyed a way of life that she had missed. The social life in the US is also a difference confronted by international students. Over winter break, many underage international students rediscovered how easy it is to go to a club or a bar to have a drink with friends outside of the US. Cultural differences reach far beyond lowered drinking ages, however: "I had forgotten the pleasure of sitting in a caf?© downtown, just to chat with friends or to go to a nice restaurant," freshman Eglantine Graf of France said. Since Tufts' international students have already experienced moving from one place to another, many find readapting to life in their home country relatively easy. Attending a high school in the US facilitates this process: many international students say that doing so helped them to feel comfortable in America before arriving at Tufts. Not all of Tufts' international students attended high school in the US, however. A large number attended international schools throughout the rest of the world. Freshman Pelin Ermis, for example, is Turkish, but she attended a French high school in Hong Kong and then moved with her parents to Singapore. She has gotten used to travelling and has little trouble adapting to new environments. Similarly, Graf attended an International School in Switzerland; travelling back and forth from school to her home in France has gotten her used to making the trip. Some international students were not able to return home over winter break. Freshman Livia Stefanini wanted to go back home to Italy, but her parents, who are diplomats, had to stay in Washington D.C. Stefanini and her parents spent Christmas in D.C. before vacationing in Jamaica and Cuba afterwards. Senior Maarouf Al-Dawalibi, originally from Saudi Arabia, had to remain in Medford over winter break because of a visa problem. Visa extensions used to require five or six days to process; now, that same process takes three to five months. Maarouf did not want to risk not being able to return to the States if his demand was rejected or delayed. "It is true that we have had new types of immigration problems to solve since Sept. 11, and more precisely since the first of Jan. 2003, as the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) imposed a new regulation," International Center Office Manager Lois Hutchings said. Hutchings added that previously unasked information is now "required for certain males from certain countries." Junior Geoff Mansfield of Hong Kong stayed on campus Thanksgiving Break of his sophomore year. "The break was terrible," Mansfield said, adding that the campus is empty and virtually everything is closed. According to Yolanda King, director of the Resident Life Office, the University supplies international students housing over the breaks. "International students who do not go home for Thanksgiving break can remain in the assigned residence hall room," King said. "If they do not go home over the winter break they are reassigned to live in winter interim housing, which currently is in Metcalf, Richardson, or Stratton." Though dining halls are closed during the break, students are able to use any kitchen facilities available in their assigned hall. The University does not charge students for housing during breaks. International students consider the optimal winter break to be a family vacation, but spring break is different. Few students return home; instead they take trips with friends. Graf, Peiretti-Paradisi, Shaab, and Haliun Ganbold from Mongolia just booked their plane tickets to go to Miami. In the hopes of getting the most out of his experience abroad, German graduate student Philipp Krushel plans to spend spring break in Arizona. "I am leaving at the end of the year, and I wanted to discover another part of the States," Krushel said.


The Setonian
News

Trade deadline approaches

The trade deadline is rapidly approaching with less than two weeks to go, and aspiring contenders are starting to look for players to fill holes in their lineups. With that in mind, this week Inside the NHL will look at some of the top teams in the league, and what they will be looking for in terms of trades to get them ready for the playoffs. It is a buyer's market in the NHL these days, with teams out of the playoff hunt trying to get rid of all their high end talent while they can, and the top teams in the league feeling pretty comfortable with what they have. Eastern Conference Ottawa Senators, first, 88 points Too bad Ottawa can't trade for a new owner. Rob Bryden's bid to buy back ownership of the team has failed, leaving the Senators playing without an owner. Other buyers have stepped forward, but for the moment it looks like the team is going to be ownerless for the rest of the regular season. This means that it is nearly impossible for the Senators to make any trades before the playoffs, since the organization is already financially strapped and any additional salaries will make it less viable for purchase. No trades would suit the Senators just fine though, with the way they've been playing, but they still don't have the championship ability of the Dallas Stars. Philadelphia Flyers, third, 81 points Philadelphia's name has come up in trade rumors of almost every major player in the league. The latest one was for Calgary Flames forward Jarome Ignilia, who has been underperforming this season despite signing a fat new contract during the season. Calgary could trade Ignila, but it would be virtually kill fan support for the team, where Ignila is really the last hope. Also, the Flyers continue to have one of the worst power plays in the league and could be looking at LA Kings' Mathieu Schneider, Chicago Blackhawks' Phil Housley or Carolina Hurricanes' Glen Wesley. Western Conference Dallas Stars, first, 89 points Dallas lost right wing Bill Guerin for the season and maybe the playoffs, which did serious damage to the team's chances. The Stars have a lot of depth, but no matter what kind of depth you have, it is hard for any team to make up for Guerin's scoring and playmaking ability. He has 25 goals and 50 points so far this season, on top of a solid 113 penalty minutes. Look for Dallas to attempt making a move with draft picks and prospects for another strong two-way player with scoring ability. Those are hardly easy to find, and even more difficult to get without giving something significant in return. That makes it more than likely that the Stars will stick with what they have, and pray that Guerin gets better in time for the playoffs. Vancouver Canucks, second, 86 points The Vancouver Canucks are working with a tight budget, but owner John McCaw signaled this season that he is willing to open up the budget a little to get an upgrade before the playoffs. Vancouver General Manager Brian Burke has said that he is keeping his eyes open, but feels he is under no obligation to make a move before or at the trade deadline, especially with the chance it could upset the core of the team that has been playing so well this season. It is unlikely that Vancouver will make any big trades before the deadline, simply because Burke is not interested in trading away too much right now. Vancouver is having one of its best seasons on record, and any trade it makes will probably be for another tough forward who can fore-check well within coach Marc Crawford's aggressive system. What Vancouver could really use is another top-four defenseman, its weakness on the blueline was exposed when Mattias Ohlund went down with a knee injury this week. But do not expect Burke to give up the players necessary to get that kind of player. Detroit Red Wings, third, 82 points Detroit has rarely made any big moves at the trade deadline, but then Detroit has rarely been without Captain Steve Yzerman either. Yzerman is back, but is still a little shaky, and the team is still only playing him every other game as he is still recovering from a knee injury that he suffered in last year's playoffs. Curtis Joseph is playing well in net, and the Wings' blueline is almost identical to the one they had when they won the Cup last year. But if Yzerman is not able to come back, and with Sergei Federov playing horribly this year, it is possible Detroit will look to bolster its scoring, but not very likely. There are rampant rumors that Phoenix Coyote defenseman Teppo Numminen could be making his way to Detroit, but nothing has come of it yet.


The Setonian
News

Student arrested while protesting opposes war with Iraq

Due to what I believe were the unjust actions made by the local police forces on Feb. 26 surrounding a peaceful protest, I was one of many arrested for disturbing the peace. The police claimed I was inciting the crowd by yelling "No War," and I was subsequently arrested and held in a cell at the Medford Police station for a few hours. Ironically, it was actually the riot police who incited the crowd by not allowing us to exercise our First Amendment right to assemble, and by attacking peaceful protestors with shields and clubs. Had I not been unjustly arrested, this was what I planned to say at the rally: Contrary to what the Bush administration wants the American people to believe, this proposed war on Iraq is a war of choice, not of necessity. This war is not about human rights violations or weapons of mass destruction, it is about changing the make-up of the Mideast. The strategizing for this war began long ago when the hawks in this Bush administration, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Cheney and the others, were in the first Bush administration. These so-called neo-conservatives believe that once Iraq is given the gift of democracy after an invasion, a domino affect will occur, beginning with the fundamentalist government of Iran falling to the numerous student protests, and that eventually the make-up of the Mideast will be much more democratic and will not allow fundamentalist groups to exist. Sept. 11 and the subsequent war on terrorism provided the perfect way to steer the country towards war with Saddam Hussein. First, we all began hearing reports that Mohammed Atta, the ringleader of the 9/11 hijackers, had met with Iraqi intelligence officials in Prague -- but that turned out to be false and it was no longer mentioned. When the anthrax debacle occurred here at home, there was more demonization of Iraq, with reports claiming the anthrax was of Iraqi origin. Like the Mohammed Atta meeting, this too was proven false when the FBI determined the anthrax was from this country. And now, suddenly, Iraq is an imminent threat with connections to al Qaeda. Iraq is the perfect country to begin the administration's dreams of re-designing the Mideast. Iran, with confirmed connections to terrorist groups, as well as a known and active weapons of mass destruction program is clearly more of a threat, but among Americans, Khatami is not the best known evildoer, as W would say; Hussein is. Even members of the pro-war sentiment realize the tactics the administration is using to justify the war. New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman, who has said he supports a war with Iraq if it is done "right," wrote in a piece last week, "I am also very troubled by the way Bush officials have tried to justify this war on the grounds that Saddam is allied with Osama bin Laden or will be very soon. There is simply no proof of that, and everytime I hear them repeat it I think of the Gulf of Tonkin resolution. You do not take the country to war on the wings of a lie. Tell people the truth. Saddam does not threaten us today. He can be deterred. Taking him out is a war of choice." Historical precedent is not on the side of Bush -- his family seems to believe that spreading lies in order to bring this nation to war is okay. Prior to the Gulf War, Bush and his cohorts released spy photos showing a supposed Iraqi troop buildup along the Saudi border, only for the world to find out later that the photos were doctored. Additionally, Bush Senior's administration placed in front of Congressional committees a Kuwaiti woman who told horror stories of Iraqi soldiers entering into Kuwait and removing Kuwaiti babies from hospital incubators and leaving them to die. Shortly after the hearings it was revealed that this woman was related to the Kuwaiti ambassador and that her stories were false. Yet, it is clearly beneficial to prevent Iraq from having weapons of mass destruction and to help the Iraqi people be free of Hussein's tyrannical rule, but war is not the way to accomplish that. The administration insists we would be fighting for peace, but war would not accomplish peace. In October 2002, the CIA declassified many documents which stated that Saddam Hussein would not use a WMD in the foreseeable future unless he was attacked and backed into a corner, thus believing he had nothing to lose, the exact scenario a US attack would create. The report reads, "Should Saddam conclude that a US-led attack could no longer be deterred, he probably would become much less constrained in adopting terrorist actions. Such terrorism might involve conventional means... or chemical or biological weapons... Saddam might decide that the extreme step of assisting Islamist terrorists in conducting a WMD attack against the US would be his last chance to exact vengeance by taking a large number of victims with him..." Like the "carpet bombing" that took place in Afghanistan, this administration's current war plans show little or no respect for human life and blatantly put civilians at risk. The ideas of Harry Ullman, the "defense intellectual" loved by the administration, are being used to draft military plans against Iraq. Ullman proposes bombarding Iraq with 800 cruise missiles in 48 hours, or one cruise missile every four minutes, day and night. Ullman also proposes taking out the infrastructure of Iraq in an attempt to make Baghdad unlivable. Taking out infrastructure like water systems, which are not military targets, is simply an attack on civilians. Ullman even advocates the "first-strike" use of so-called "bunker-buster" nuclear weapons to destroy buried facilities, not surprising from a man who has praised the use of atomic weapons on civilian targets in WWII. The possibility that the administration is considering a preemptive nuclear attack is simply abhorrent, and in no way can be justified. Civilian casualties are obviously not even being considered by this administration. The fact is that inspections work, and they are a peaceful path to disarmament. Iraq is continually making concessions, recently allowing interviews with Iraqi scientists in private as well as the use of U-2 spy planes to gather intelligence. On Feb. 11, France submitted a plan to the UN Security Council calling for extended inspections. The plan includes tripling the number of inspectors and increased aerial surveillance flights. There has also been talk of sending in UN peacekeepers to bolster the inspection teams. Additionally, while past UN inspections in Iraq have not discovered every single illicit weapon, prior to their departure, the inspection teams destroyed or made unusable over 48 long range missiles, 14 conventional missile warheads, 30 chemical warheads, close to 40,000 chemical munitions, and 690 tons of chemical weapons agents. Continued inspections will mean further disarmament. Options also remain to free Iraq from the tyranny of Hussein. Saddam should be indicted for crimes against humanity and be tried at the International Criminal Court. This strategy has proven successful with Slobidan Milosevic who was convicted for his crimes against humanity and is now incarcerated. It is clear that this war must be opposed, and the people of the world recognize this. President George W Bush said he ignores the anti-war protests; let's make it impossible for his dad not to hear us. Philip Martin is a freshman who has yet to declare a major and is a member of TCOWI.


The Setonian
News

Senate bylaw restricts fundraising

The Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate recently passed a bylaw that will affect how student organizations -- particularly the Leonard Carmichael Society (LCS) -- are allowed to raise money for charity. "Any organization which does not budget income for an event may not sell tickets or charge money in exchange for admission to the event," the new bylaw reads. Approved by the Senate on Feb. 2, the bylaw is meant to be a "clarification of what really has been a rule all along but which has never had the backing of a rule to be enforced," Senate Treasurer Ben Lee said. The most affected student group is expected to be LCS, whose members voiced their concern at the Senate's open forum on the issue Sunday. The organization's biggest issue was how the bylaw will affect the annual LCS Semiformal, held each year in the fall semester. LCS has not traditionally budgeted any income for this event, giving all ticket proceeds to charity. Since most students attending the dance are doing so primarily to benefit charity, they do not mind that the money does not go toward reimbursing LCS's expenses, LCS members said. Donating ticket sales to charity will not be possible under the new bylaw. Such practices are essentially "double-charging," Senators said. Every student is required to pay an annual student activities fee of $206, increasing to $215 next year. Since the funds from the student activities fee are used to fund all student groups, charging students for tickets whose proceeds will go to charity is "essentially requiring them to pay for an event that they already paid for," Lee said. "While I doubt that most Tufts students have a problem paying extra so that a charity can benefit, it does not seem fair to just to force a student to pay extra to go to an event, simply so that money can be given to charity," he said. According to the LCS members at the meeting, the new bylaw will diminish LCS's ability to give charitable donations to programs in the surrounding community. Without the funding that donations from LCS events provide, some of the programs that students volunteer with would be shut down, LCS President Lisa Fishlin said. "Tufts students are going to see a significant decrease in volunteer opportunities," she said. In response, several senators urged groups to suggest that donations be made at their events rather than charging for tickets. "No group is allowed to budget money to charity," Lee said. Just as much money could be raised through suggested donations as through required ticket sales, he said. Director of the Office of Community Relations and LCS advisor Barbara Rubel attended the meeting on behalf of LCS. The senators "are squelching a charitable intention," Rubel said. Some senators brought up the fact that LCS's constitution says that its mission is to provide opportunities for Tufts students to do charitable work -- not necessarily to give away money. LCS's focus should be on "labor opportunities, not money," Senator Cho Ling said. "Unfortunately, we have to think of our students and their activitities fee, not the Medford/Somerville community." Since Tufts does not pay taxes, LCS members argued, the community expects this contribution from its students. Other groups besides LCS -- including Hillel -- could be affected, Rubel said "Philosophically, [the Senate] is saying that volunteering is not important," she said. Lee told the LCS representatives that they were welcome to submit a plea to the Allocations Board (ALBO) to either overturn or seek an exemption from the bylaw. If the bylaw were overturned, though, "the budget for TCU activities could potentially be $400,000 less. When groups budget income for an event, it cuts down on the costs that must be taken from the student activities fee allowing for more programs to happen on campus," Lee said. By attending the meeting, LCS hoped to promote dialogue on the issue, Former LCS President Kate Elder said. The Senate meeting resulted in the passage of a motion made by Senator Jos?© Vazquez, which resolved to call a meeting of group signatories to consider how charitable funds can be raised in light of the new bylaw.


The Setonian
News

Former Tufts VP resigns from Brandeis post

Former Tufts Vice President Mel Bernstein abruptly left his post as provost of Brandeis last month after less than two years on the job. Little explanation for the departure was given, and both Bernstein and Brandeis President Jehuda Reinharz have refused to talk to the media. The departure of an administrator in the middle of an academic year is unusual, though not unheard of, according to Brandeis Associate Vice President for University Affairs John Hose. The community was informed in an e-mail from the President that said, "After much reflection, Dr. Bernstein has decided that his academic vision and goals are better suited to a different institution, and that both he and Brandeis University would be best served by his departure." This e-mail came as a surprise to almost everyone at Brandeis. "I hadn't noticed conflict -- but I'm not privy to all these meetings," said Associate Provost for Academic Affairs Michaele Whelan, who left Tufts for Brandeis a few months after Bernstein. Faculty also said they had no idea what was happening until they received the e-mail and have since not been told anything. The few people at Brandeis willing to speak publicly about Bernstein's department say they did not see any major rifts between him and the faculty or administrators. "Within the senior administration, my relationship with him was very positive," Hose said. "Among others with whom I work closely, I think he was well-received and well-liked. "There are well-liked people who come and go from universities just as there are disliked people who remain." Bernstein was supposed to stay on at Brandeis as senior Vice President for Academic and Research Policy and a professor of chemistry. But he is not listed as teaching any class this semester and his office at Brandeis was cleared out within days. It is likely that no one will ever know what went on between President Reinharz and Bernstein that caused the abrupt resignation. The e-mail was "intended as the essence of what's going to be said and no more," Hose said. "Because issues such as this are personnel matters, there are vast areas that the University wouldn't discuss about any employee in any circumstance." Bernstein's main accomplishment in his short time at Brandeis was the development of new curricular initiatives in conjunction with the faculty. These proposals, which include the creation of interdisciplinary majors and minors such as global studies, creative writing, health sciences, society, and policy, and business, continue to be debated and put in place in Bernstein's absence. "The fact that they're all continuing is a testimony to the fact that they emerged from the community itself," Whelan said. Though Bernstein had a five-year contract with Brandeis, the provost is an employee-at-will, meaning that he can be asked to resign at anytime, according to former Brandeis Provost Irving Epstein, who preceded Bernstein. An intense conflict between the provost and president or board of trustees is one possibility for why a provost would step down, he said. "Being unwilling to carry out an order one deems unreasonable, e.g. closing a school, might be another scenario, but there is no evidence for this in Dr. Bernstein's case," he said. It is also not unusual for a new university administrator not to be a right fit for the school. An estimated 20 percent of all administrators last less than two years in the job, according to former Tufts provost Sol Gittleman. "For a provost coming from outside the university, learning and adapting quickly to the Brandeis culture is another difficult challenge," Epstein said. At Brandeis, Bernstein was coming into a well-established administration. Reinharz has served as president for the last ten years and was provost prior to that. Bernstein served as vice president for arts, sciences, engineering, and technology at Tufts for ten years before he left for Brandeis. Prior to that, he was provost of the Illinois Institute of Technology. His predecessor at Tufts suffered a similar fate upon leaving the University. Robert Rutberg left to become president of Lafayette College and lasted only two years in the position. His departure was partially related to discontent over his efforts to control athletics. Bernstein was also not the only dean to leave Brandeis last month. Sophomore class dean Deborah Hahn resigned the same day he did, effective immediately. According to Brandeis personnel, the resignation was unrelated.


The Setonian
News

Shameful attention-mongering

When a handful of demonstrators interrupted the Issam Fares lecture on Feb. 26, they embarrassed themselves and the entire Tufts community. The method of their protest was completely unacceptable, and the motivations were highly questionable. This viewpoint is not about liberals versus conservatives, or pro-war versus anti-war. It is about common decency, manners, and the difference between constructive dialogue and shameful attention-mongering. Regardless of all other issues, the manner of protest which these individuals engaged in was beyond any boundary of etiquette. As George Herbert Walker Bush was making a plea for greater racial and ethnic understanding in the United States, a small group of individuals began blowing noisemakers, shouting unintelligibly, and waving an American flag defaced with scrawled vulgarities. When several police officers peacefully removed the offending parties from the lecture hall, one of the individuals waved an extended middle finger at the former President during her entire walk out. Just minutes after Mr. Bush resumed his speech, individuals too cowardly to show their faces began shouting insults at him. None of these stunts accomplished anything. They lacked any sort of intellectual content. They were just vulgarity for the purpose of drawing attention. I myself use foul language from time to time, but the motivation behind hurling obscene personal insults at an 80-year old man while he lectures on racial understanding is completely unfathomable to me. The individuals involved will no doubt claim that their stunt was intended as democratic debate and criticism on war with Iraq. Nothing could be further from the truth. First, the lecture was not about the current issue of war with Saddam Hussein, and Bush said so quite pointedly in his speech. It certainly was not about raising support for his son. Bush aimed his speech at two valid issues related to "Perspectives on the Middle East": racism following the 9/11 attacks directed toward those of Middle Eastern descent, and the necessity of outside negotiation to end violence in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Admittedly, his lecture was somewhat simplistic. It was meant to appeal to all political groups. However, that did not prevent these individuals from disrupting his lecture and shouting about a topic he was not here to discuss. Secondly and more importantly, some members of the Tufts faculty had worked very hard to organize a round-table panel to discuss the Bush lecture and the possibility of war with Iraq. Only ten students attended. From my unscientific head count, at least twice that number were involved with booing and waving vulgar, unconstructive signs at Mr. Bush. Since these individuals did not bring up any concrete issues or arguments with their disruption (especially the American flag with F--- BUSH painted on it), and because they chose not to be involved with a serious round-table discussion, I am forced to conclude that they were more interested in winning 15 minutes of fame instead of fostering any genuine debate on the topic. In addition, the reasons they gave for staging this disturbance are not very credible. Some have argued that by allowing His Excellency Mr. Issam Fares to choose Mr. Bush Sr. as a speaker, the University was giving tacit approval to the political agenda of President Bush Jr. When one outlines the issue as such, it sounds just as absurd as it is. Furthermore, those who argue this viewpoint seem to forget that just last year, former President William Jefferson Clinton was the guest of the Fares lecture series. No one seemed to think at that time that letting him speak was paramount to endorsing liberal politics. These arguments must be applied equally to both liberals and conservatives -- one cannot be selective. Furthermore, some have voiced displeasure at the fact that only a handful of selected, pre-screened questions were allowed. Once again, I must immediately remind people of Clinton's lecture, which had the exact same policy. This is not a right-wing conspiracy. It is merely the format for the Fares lecture, regardless of the speaker. And finally, some expressed anger that Mr. Bush would be speaking without having an opposing viewpoint represented or argued at the same time. Quite bluntly, I respond that it is the Fares lecture series, not the Fares seminar series. This manner of one-sided address has been around for thousands of years -- as long as politicians and political figures have. It is not a unique or sinister creation. Every rational person in the room knows that Bush was presenting his opinion, not some divine truth that they must accept unquestioningly. There is nothing wrong with publicly opposing war with Iraq. But there is something wrong with repeatedly interrupting an 80-year-old man's speech with vulgarities and noise-makers. There is no possible justification for the sheer level of rudeness displayed by a handful of individuals at the Fares lecture. They disgraced themselves, and their actions reflected poorly on the entire campus community. Their behavior runs against every rule of common decency that all Tufts students -- indeed, all adults -- should know and understand. My bitterness with these individuals has nothing to do with their political views, and everything to do with their selfish stunts for personal attention that disrupted a major campus function. They should be ashamed. Eric Mitton is a senior majoring in history.


The Setonian
News

Wendell Phillips finalists to speak

The selection process for the Wendell Phillips Award will come to a close today when the eight finalists present their speeches to the Committee on Student Life. The finalists have been asked to envision their ideal community service project, to talk about what they would like to accomplish, and with whom they would like to work. The award will be presented to one senior, who will earn the right to speak at graduation, and is in honor of Wendell Phillips, the great Boston preacher and orator. It will be awarded to one of the following seniors who best demonstrates oratory skills and shows a dedication to community service. Bradley Crotty, a Bio-Chemistry major, is an Omidyar Scholar who created a project at the Sharewood Free Health Clinic to develop and institute a care management program for clinic patients. He is the founding editor of TuftScope, a journal connecting bioethics with active citizenship values. He is a past president of the Tufts Chapter of the American Medical Student Association and a second year chair of the Undergraduate Research & Symposium. He also co-taught an explorations course "Bioscience, Ethics, & Public Policy" last semester. Kate Elder is a Community Health and International Relations major, and is the former President of Leonard Carmichael Society (LCS). She has worked with the Harvard AIDS Institute and has been nominated as a Tufts Emerging Leader. She is also a member of the squash team and is fluent in French. Rachel Gutter, an English major, has been a member of the Golden Key society and has volunteered with numerous LCS organizations, including Special Friends and Halloween on the Hill. She is a second time RA, a figure skater and a writer of a screenplay and a children's book. During her time at Tufts she tutored children through numerous organizations and teaches religious school. Matthew Kane, an Economics major and Political Science minor, is a trustee representative for both the Trustees of Tufts College, and the TCU senate. He is treasurer of Hillel and a past Tufts Daily news editor. He was an executive board member of the Ex-College and taught an explorations course, "Stop the Reels: The News Media through Film." Elizabeth Monnin, a double major in Peace and Justice Studies and Women's studies, is a member of the Golden Key Society and the National Society of Collegiate Scholars. She is an Omidyar Scholar and works with Student Sexual Assault Response Assistance (SSARA). She worked with the Tufts Feminist Alliance and taught an Explorations course for freshmen. She is a rape crisis counselor and former member of Students for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and Amnesty International. Jamila Moore is an English and American Studies major with a minor in African Studies. She is a writing fellow, a resident assistant for the center for Reading and Language Research, former Editor-in-Chief of Onyx magazine, and a former teacher for the Learning Bridge program. Elaine Wang is an International Relations and Economics major, and a dancer and choreographer for Spirit of Color and Tufts Dance Collective. In addition to working in the news and editorial departments at the Tufts Daily, she participated in the Tufts Institute for Leadership and International Perspective. She is a member of the Golden Key International Honor Society and the National Society of Collegiate Scholars. She has also volunteered with LCS.


The Setonian
News

Alpha Phi sorority temporarily shut down

The Alpha Phi sorority was temporarily closed by the University on Friday after two pledges were taken into protective custody by Medford Police and two other pledges were treated by Tufts Emergency Medical Services (TEMS), all on Thursday night. Medford Police allegedly placed the two freshmen into custody after they were unable to pay for the taxi they took to leave an Alpha Phi event. The details of the event are still unclear, according to Dean of Students Bruce Reitman, whose office is investigating the sorority. One of the students treated by TEMS had to go to the hospital, although both have recovered. The Dean of Students Office said that the sorority will remain closed while administrators investigate whether the sorority's sisters were involved in providing alcohol to underage pledges on Thursday evening. When a sorority or fraternity is closed, no one except residents are allowed in the house, including sisters and pledges, and all activities are suspended Last weekend, the Zeta Psi fraternity was temporarily closed pending an investigation into the injuries of Sebastian Gonzalez, a pledge who suffered minor brain damage from a fall after a party at the fraternity. Gonzalez has been recently released from the hospital, but is not yet planning to return to the University. Although no Alpha Phi member was seriously injured, Reitman said when four pledges are involved in one incident, the University needs to investigate. Even when incidents happen off-campus, if a campus organization has a role in the event, "it can still be subject to campus scrutiny." But Reitman was adamant that the closures at Zeta Psi and Alpha Phi were not disciplinary measures. "These closures are temporary measures until the investigations are finished," Reitman said. There is some feeling on campus that the Greek system in serious jeopardy after the University closed two of its houses. However, the system is not going to disappear, said Inter-Greek Council (IGC) President Jessica Grasso. "The incidents are disappointing for both houses, but with a little bit of work things will work out for everyone in the end," she said. According to Grasso, the Greeks are willing to do whatever it takes to regain the favor of the administration.


The Setonian
News

Administration too closed minded

The Administration's decision to close down Alpha Phi is an overreaction that shows no regard for the true significance of Greek life on campus, not only to fraternity and sorority members, but also to the student body as a whole. Certainly the behavior of the four Alpha Phi pledges was questionable and colored by poor judgment, but it does not merit the closing of a campus institution. While the IGC has assured the student body that the Greek system is not in jeopardy, the closing of this sorority house clearly demonstrates the vulnerability of the system to hasty administrative decisions. And the fact that this action has been undertaken twice this semester indicates the serious need for additional staff to provide guidance to fraternity and sorority leaders. While the Administration may claim to have good reason for closing Alpha Phi, clearly such action would not have been taken if not for the ripple effect caused by the recent closing of Zeta Psi. As an isolated incident there would have been no justification for such an extreme response to an incident in which no one was seriously injured. This is a dangerous trend that needs serious attention from the members of the Greek system. Surprisingly, the Administration's decision does not appear to hinge on anything specifically Greek, but rather on the fact that students may have been providing alcohol to minors. Yet, haven't most campus organizations (not just those that are Greek) at one point thrown parties where minors consumed alcohol? Fraternities and sororities cannot possibly be the only officially recognized organizations that have purchased alcohol and served it to (appreciative) minors. Alpha Phi appears to have somehow been singled out, since the administration's reasoning indicates that any organization whose members provide alcohol to minors should be temporarily closed for investigation. The closing of Zeta Psi and Alpha Phi leaves no reason to doubt that the Administration would rather see a Greek-free Tufts. If this is not the case, then the Dean of Students office needs to provide a concrete plan for reviving and enhancing sororities and fraternities on campus. Closing down houses left and right is not the way to create an active and productive Greek system; it's more of a lazy way out.


The Setonian
News

EPIIC News Briefs

U.S. Intervention: From Vietnam to Iraq Pulitzer Prize-winning authors David Halberstram and Leslie Gelb (LA'59) debated the role that the US should play in Iraq. Their discussion covered topics in international law, questioned whether the US is an empire, and addressed the fact that many American citizens and leaders are not informed about foreign policy issues. Halberstram showed apprehension about a war in Iraq. "We are punching our hand into a hornets nest," he said, because of the intensity of the Middle East's emotions against the US. He was adamant that the lessons learned by the US from its intervention in Vietnam should be heeded. Gelb, who is also the President of the Council on Foreign Relations, supported US involvement, saying that the US should use its power to better the world by disarming Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein. --by Jonathan Graham US Foreign Policy: A New Age of Empire? Five politicians and scholars discussed the role of the US as an empire in the modern world, and whether the US hegemonic position in world affairs was beneficial or detrimental to other nations. The panel featured authors Philip Bobbitt, Gwyn Prins and Andrew Bacevich, former Canadian Prime Minister Kim Campbell, and former South African Minister of Constitutional Affairs Roelf Meyer, who served under both the De Klerk and Mandela administrations. The opinions between the panelists varied greatly, with each having a different perspective on whether the US is an empire, and what its purpose in the world should be. Campbell felt strongly that the US should act in a more imperialist fashion and should become more involved in world events, something that she said the country's history shows it has failed to do in the past. "The war memorials in my country say 1914 to 1918, and 1939 to 1945," Campbell said, referring to the US's later entry to both World Wars. --by Jonathan Graham Sovereignty and Globalization: New Challenges Though the panel was supposed to address the challenges of globalization to state sovereignty, the speakers instead debated the humanitarian aid justification for war with Iraq. Former president of the International Committee of the Red Cross Cornelio Sommaruga was presented with the Dr. Jean Mayer Global Citizenship Award. In his acceptance, Sommaruga spoke of the need to develop an international humanitarian community, directed by the ideals and personnel of the United Nations. Sommaruga stressed humanitarian aid as the cornerstone for military intervention, and he criticized the US for not making this a priority. Co-panelist Ramu Damodaran, the editor in chief of UN Chronicle, agreed that the UN must be the tool for humanitarian action. Boston University political science professor Robert Jackson used his time to give a detailed account of US intervention since 1945. University of Texas Law School professor and author Philip Bobbitt disagreed strongly with the preceding speakers, arguing that the humanitarian crisis in Iraq does indeed justify intervention. Similarly, Gwyn Prins, a research professor at the London School of Economics and Columbia University, supported US intervention on the basis of humanitarian aid, and he criticized Europe for its incoherence in a time of crisis. --by Brian Loeb Market Evolution and Political Revolution: Mad Money in Latin America Economist Ricado Hausman, lawyer Luis Moreno Ocampo, and historian Peter Winn debated reasons for economic failure in Latin America at a panel which focused on economies within the international scene. Tufts History Professor Peter Winn gave a brief introduction to the economic history of Latin America, specifically relating the role of international organizations in its national economies, and how this can be seen as a ceding of sovereignty. He said that governments have become so dependent on what international organizations and their economists dictate that they no longer represent the people who actually elected them. Hausman, former chair of the International Monetary Fund-World Bank Development Committee, argued that there is a basic conflict between the proliferation of nation states since the end of World War II and the attempts to bring down economic borders. Hausman, who is from Venezuela, said that he felt the United States should be proud of many of its past interventions in other nations and that he approved of international organizations monitoring national governments. Moreno Ocampo, who was a criminal prosecutor in the human rights case against Argentina's former military junta, focused on networks of corruption -- argued that the legal framework in Latin American countries was failing and at fault for the economic disasters of recent years. He showed that corruption is built into the system, and subverts it on every level. --by Jordana Timerman Transnational Crime: Subverting Sovereignty National borders make it very difficult to bring transnational criminals to justice, a fact that was made clear in this panel which included the Secretary General of Interpol, the former US Deputy Attorney General. Secretary General of Interpol Ronald K. Noble explained that Interpol is basically a voluntary international police force. The 181 member countries share information in hopes of helping each other catch criminals who have crossed national borders. "Fighting international crime requires thinking across boundaries and acting across borders," Noble said. Philip Heymann, former US Deputy Attorney General, pointed out the difficulties of prosecuting people, a job that only becomes more difficult when done on an international level. The entire process is very dependent on cooperation, he said. Argentine lawyer, Luis Moreno Ocampo, suggested an innovative approach to subverting transnational crime, saying that banks should be recruited into the effort. He used an example of a bank employee that noted a suspicious deposit and helped catch an international criminal. by Carri Hulet