Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Time to reboot

When the Administration announced the plan to charge for library and Eaton printouts, the Daily opposed the idea from every angle. Charging $0.10 per page would cause students to sacrifice the pursuit of academics in order to save money and would create massive inefficiency and frustration for already stressed students. And at a school that charges $35,000 a year for tuition and room and board alone, it is basically impossible to defend any additional nickel and diming. Luckily, the libraries' plan to begin charging for printouts has yet to be implemented, thereby leaving students with an opportunity to prove that the plan is unnecessary. The vast majority of students agree that the pay-for-print plan is outrageous and would be detrimental to both students' general quality of life and academic experiences. But how many students have made a serious effort to combat the problem that has created the apparent need for the pay-for-print system? After all, nobody would deny that a tremendous amount of paper is wasted every day in the library and at Eaton. Where are all the environmentally conscious students to negotiate with the libraries about potential ways to combat this wasteful practice? Certainly between ECO and LCS, we have plenty of students capable of serving the community by implementing environment-friendly policies for printer use. Instead of just complaining about the inevitability of the pay-for-print plan, students leaders need be proactive in eliminating the need to spend so much on printing supplies. What about organizing a way of reusing scrap paper? Or perhaps a more visible student-led initiative to inform computer-users about wasting paper would eliminate talk of the pay-for-print system. Tisch director Jo-Ann Michalak has said that the library is still waiting to implement the system and that the start date hinges on "what comes in the semester." What clearer message to students could there be about the future of this plan, at least for this year? It may be easier to whine about the definite possibility of the pay-for-print system, but there may still be time to be more proactive. If students want to save their own money, they can start by trying to save some of the library's.


The Setonian
News

Ruining a legacy

In case you didn't realize, Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines is on its (slow) way to theaters. And man, am I pissed. First of all, if you haven't seen the Terminator movies: too bad. I'm not going to summarize them for you. Stop reading. I don't care about you. If you're in the mood, go watch them and then read this. If you're not, I repeat: I don't care. Suck a lemon. I consider Terminator 2: Judgment Day a great work of legitimate film, and I'm willing to defend that claim to the death. Cameron takes his embittered-empowered-female-warrior character -- an archetype he clearly loves, as seen before in The Abyss and to excellent effect in Aliens -- to a new level with Sarah Connor. Terminator 2 combines rapid-fire action (featuring sterling special effects that stand up to today's best) with human drama of momentous consequences. As Sarah strives to become as heartless and mechanical as possible, dehumanizing those around her in order to protect her son and ultimately serve the greater good, the Terminator learns and grows, becoming more human and compassionate every day. What matters more: efficiency or human emotion? Does one mean anything without the other? But I'm not in the mood to defend this magnum opus (you heard me -- no number of Academy Awards will put Titanic ahead of Terminator 2). The point is not how good Terminator 2 is; it's how unnecessary Terminator 3 is. Working with the time travel and causality aspects: Was the whole save-the-future-by-changing-the-present strategy flawed? John and Sarah destroyed all of the Terminator CPUs, along with all the data and materials at Cyberdyne. We've been led to believe by the first two movies that the design for the Terminators relied on studying the samples sent back through time. But if all of the chips have been destroyed, what will Cyberdyne study to build SkyNet? The Terminators should never exist at all. I'll concede that the theory of time travel here is flawed or at least inadequately explained. The timeline is circular, yet they have the ability to change the future? I don't buy it. Given that the entire concept is flawed...okay. Sure. Let's accept that the Terminators developed through some other means, and they're still pissed at John Connor and want to come back to kill him so they can rule the planet. The narrative still works. What doesn't work is the artistic and creative purpose behind making the movie. Sure, the machines would still want to take John out. But why is the story worth telling? Strike one: James Cameron isn't involved. He didn't write the story or the screenplay, and he didn't direct. He was the overwhelming force behind both previous films, but he has no creative control for Terminator 3. Yes, Cameron makes exhausting, expensive movies, but he makes good movies. Without him, Terminator 3 is likely to degenerate into a typical action-fest, and that's not what it should be about at all. Strike two: In The Terminator, the machines went after Sarah Connor. In Terminator 2 they attacked John directly. So Terminator 3 will feature...another attack on John. Wooooo. We're dealing with the same concept again. It's not that there's anything inherently wrong with repeating the idea; it's that it turns the series into a formula. No longer can you call the Terminator series a serious concept. It's pure action now. Strike three: You can't improve on the T-1000. Making a female Terminator called the "Terminatrix" may make for good ad copy, but a female Terminator has no advantages over the morphing, chameleon, liquid-metal T-1000. The T-1000 could look like anyone or anything, and it could kill you (presumably from a decent distance, too) without any weapons at all. Hell, it could look like a woman when it wanted to. So how does making a Terminator female improve on the androgynous menace of the T-1000? It might have been okay if the writer thought of some clever plot conceit that would demand a special Terminator. Maybe the machines needed to kill John in some subtle, undetectable way, and so they sent back a sweet, demure Terminatrix. John would meet a perfectly nice girl while grocery shopping. They'd go out on a couple of dates, get to know each other, have a couple obligatory, steamy love scenes. Then she'd invite John out to her cabin in the mountains for the weekend. Upon getting there, she would dismember and bury John and wait for the machine revolution to come. That would be awesome and unexpected. But no, instead we get a sexy Terminatrix with missiles and a well-loaded bosom. Bull. (And don't get me started on the remarkable aging that the Terminator undergoes in the three movies. I understand that Schwarzenegger is getting older, but that's yet another reason not to make more. It's silly.) Sure, this isn't a new trend. If there's money to be made in a series-ruining episode, somebody will stoop to make it (hooray, capitalism). Look at the Alien series (a blast from Cameron's own past). Despite being of arguably lesser quality, Alien 3 made a fair amount of sense as a follow-up to Aliens. Five years later came the unnecessary, glitzy splurge of Alien Resurrection. Thankfully, this CG-animated, Winona-Ryder-starring, overblown cash cow seems to have killed the series off for good. I can watch my Alien box set and pretend that it's a trilogy, that the fourth one was just a dream, that the broken Alien Resurrection DVD hidden under the couch never existed. And of course there are the world's unnecessary sequels. Mannequin 2. Sister Act 2. Home Alone 2: Lost in New York (not to badmouth the sublime original). But bastardizing a concept into worthless shill sequels can't compare to sullying an entire series' good name. Let's bow our collective heads and pray against the specter of Terminator 4 because we all know that Terminator 3 is going to make it big. I hate the idea, but I know I'm going to see it, and so will most twenty-something guys. But there's no way I'm going to buy a Terminator box set that includes the Terminatrix.


The Setonian
News

Mistake of principles, not politics

Former President George Herbert Walker Bush will be delivering this year's Issam Fares Lecture. According to the Lecture Series' homepage, the speech is designed "to promote greater understanding in America on various subjects related to Lebanon and the Middle East." However, such a goal can not be accomplished in the format and setting that the Lecture Series offers. The format for the speech precludes democratic debate and excludes any controversial exchanges of ideas. The evening's tone will be set by accolades from the President for the Lecture Series in general and Issam Fares in particular (Fares is a large donor to the University). This will be followed by a short speech by Issam Fares who will then warmly greet the former President (they happen to be close friends). In turn, Bush will speak on the Middle East. Afterwards, a limited number of pre-screened questions will be asked through a moderator (most likely Bacow). Then, when time is up, there will be photo opportunities and the student body will file out of the gym. This format is far from the vibrant, challenging, and engaging settings that accompany true discourse. By preventing the student body from asking candid, open and pointed questions, the administration has turned its back on intellectualism and democracy. Without a free and fair exchange of ideas how can a "greater understanding" be reached? The history of this lecture series shows us the real reason for such a procedure is actually to silence dissent. Two years ago Doug Hansen, a Tufts University student, asked that year's Issam Fares lecturer Colin Powell a pointed question on Iraqi sanctions. Since that question, the Administration has enacted a policy whereby all future questions are screened. The lack of pointed questions at last year's lecture shows just how effective the screening of questions can be. The result is an environment where the speaker's ideas go unchallenged. It is important to recognize the Administration's argument on this issue. They claim that the screening process prevents frivolous questions from being asked and is more fair and practical than allowing the first person to a microphone out of the 1800 or so audience members to ask his or her question. If this is truly the Administration's desire, then I believe that there are more democratic ways to go about achieving the same end. First of all, if this is to be an opportunity for learning we must be able to ask questions freely and openly. Secondly, if questions must be screened then the process should be a transparent one and those selecting the questions should represent a wide range of political ideologies. This can be accomplished quite easily by inviting one representative from each student publication to sit on a panel that will choose the questions democratically. They would be charged with providing the moderator with a variety of well-thought out questions from a full spectrum of political ideologies. Thirdly, if the Administration insists upon continuing with this undemocratic and anti-intellectual structure, they should, at the very least, provide the student body with a separate assembly designed to debate the merits of the former President's comments. Without that exchange of ideas, the speech will be simply a symbolic gesture of goodwill on behalf of the administration and the University to George Bush and the Republican Party. It is important that we not overlook this symbolism. By welcoming George Bush into the Tufts community, especially at this time of heightened debate on an invasion of Iraq, without encouraging dissent, discussion, debate, or even pointed questions, the University appears to be endorsing Bush's political agenda and the war on Iraq. The Administration must find a way around this seeming endorsement of an extremely controversial foreign policy decision. By opening up the lecture space to dissent and discussion this unfortunate situation can be averted. Similar to the Democrat's rebuttal at this year's State of the Union address, the Administration could offer a spot at the podium for a progressive thinker who could put forth arguments different from those Bush will be giving. This would clearly fit within the frameworks of intellectualism and democracy that we as a University community claim to uphold. On the other hand, if, as the lecture series claims, the goal of this speech is to "promote greater understanding" then George Bush was a poor choice for the speaker. He will not be saying anything new when he visits the Gantcher center and without new information understanding cannot grow. While the speech may be slightly different than the one he presented here in 1994, it will not differ from the party line that his son is touting, nor will it be distinct from the message on the Middle East he delivered on CNN a week ago. Not only will he not say anything new, but he cannot say anything new. His views on the subject are those expressed every day on CNN. They are the views that come out of the mouths of Condelleza Rice and Colin Powell. They are the views of Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Every single Tufts student is already aware of the stance George Bush has taken on the Middle East. As a result, the content of his speech is of no real use. It is simply a new showcase for these old views. Critics of this point believe that regardless of the content of the speech, the event itself will be memorable. They believe that having someone of George Bush's stature on campus has some sort of inherent worth to an intellectual community. To these critics there are three logical responses. First of all, we must ask the question, "What has led to Bush's invitation?" Are our priorities such that we blindly reward power, especially power attained not by hard work or intellectualism, but power attained through the luck of birth? (It is Bush's father, Prescott Bush, who made family money by supplying Hitler with raw materials and credit until his businesses were seized under the Trading with the Enemy Act in 1942.). Are we such fans of authority that instead of inviting an intellectual or a scholar on the Middle East we spend tens of thousands of dollars to bring in a talking head with nothing new to say simply because he once sat in this country's throne room? We must question our fascination with power. Secondly, if our only intent is to create a memorable event at Tufts, then there are other speakers who are famous for reasons besides political clout that could headline events that might inherently benefit the Tufts community. Last year's lecture by Desmond Tutu comes to mind. While his politics are different than those of George Bush, it is the difference in their personas that are most important to this argument. Most of us had heard of Desmond Tutu before his speech, however, few of us had heard him speak or understood his politics. As a result, the Tutu lecture provided an opportunity for learning and discussion (He accepted open and uncensored questions). The opposite is true of George Bush, a former President and political pundit who has been actively in the public eye for the last two decades. Also, by inviting Tutu we were honoring, not his position of political power, but rather his prowess as a thinker. By inviting Bush we are falling into a trap of celebrity worship and deification of authority figures. Thirdly, it is important to realize that Bush is famous for being President of the United States. By inviting him to the University and providing him with an open and unchallenged space the University is in effect endorsing his actions as President, as well as the upcoming actions of his son (which Bush has repeatedly and openly supported). We must decide as a community what is more important -- our support of democracy and intellectualism or our desire to be in close proximity with someone famous. We must decide exactly how valuable the Fares Lecture Series is to Tufts University. If we are not being challenged by new ideas is it worth the tens of thousands of dollars we spend to finance these speeches? There are countless other ways to promote understanding of the Middle East. In order to do so; however, we are going to have to move beyond the power obsession and anti-intellectualism inherent in the Fares Lecture and create free and open spaces where these topics can be discussed and debated in a vibrant and lively setting. After Bush's speech, when we all head home wondering why he didn't say anything of importance, an opportunity will have been lost. We must find a way to create a democratic setting at Bush's lecture. The Gantcher center should be home to debate rather that propaganda and symbolism. Adam Carlis is a senior majoring in Peace and Justice Studies.


The Setonian
News

Shapiro ends home career in style

For Brian Shapiro, it couldn't really have ended any better. In his last game at Cousens Gym, in front of what he called "the biggest crowd I've seen since I've been here," the senior co-captain did not disappoint. Shapiro racked up 17 points in Tufts' first round playoff win against Middlebury on Saturday, but it was not so much the amount of points that mattered. It was when and how he got them. After an 11-3 run by Middlebury, Shapiro entered the game, and after a Craig Coupe lay-up, converted a three-point play to tie the game at 20 apiece, slowing down the Panthers' momentum. And with the final seconds ticking off the clock in the first half and the Jumbos down 39-38, Shapiro calmly stepped about a foot behind the three-point line and drained a trey to give Tufts a two-point lead going into the break. "It's funny because when I called him I said, 'Shap, make some threes and open up the game.' And he did at the beginning, he made some," coach Bob Sheldon said. "And then the second half he said to me, 'Coach, put me in I'll make another one.'" Shapiro lived up to his word. Just over eight minutes into the second half, with Tufts holding on to a tenuous one-point lead, it was once again Shapiro who stood up to lift his team on his shoulders. Standing about three feet behind the arc, Shapiro gave a quick fake, stared straight at his defender, and nonchalantly nailed a three to put his team up by four. After a Middlebury miss, not more than 30 seconds later, Shapiro again received the ball a solid three feet behind the three point line. And as if to tell Middlebury, "not today, not in my gym, not to my team," Shapiro threw up an impossible, off-balance shot with a hand in his face and every law of physics acting against him, and drained it. Game, set, match. Middlebury never came closer than six for the rest of the game. Shapiro added one more three-ball with 3:58 left to play that put Tufts up by 11, and further diminished Middlebury's rapidly dissipating hopes. The game featured Shapiro at his best: nailing impossible shots that most people would not even consider taking in a video game, let alone on an actual court, in an actual game, that was actually the most important one of the season. They are what Sheldon calls "classic Shapiro shots." And when he starts hitting them, he doesn't really miss. "He comes off the bench and he's just instant offense," senior Mike McGlynn said. "He gives us a spark when he comes in. He'll shoot it anywhere over half court, and when he gets going he's not going miss, so when he gets hot, you should get him the ball." Yesterday, when it was most important, he had one of those days. It was raw talent on display, combined with a strong will to win. And in both categories, there aren't many players better than Shapiro. "It hasn't happened that much this year, so it was nice to finally do that again," Shapiro said. "It doesn't happen very often, so it's good that it happened today rather than in some game that doesn't matter. I'm not really playing as much as I used to, so it's nice to do well for the team." After a senior season that has not always gone his way, it could not have been much sweeter. "It was nice to see. He's such a competitor and he's made big shots for us over the years. And those were big shots," Sheldon said. "It's nice that as a senior, after this year hasn't really gone as well as he wanted, and then to step up and be able to do that. It makes you feel good about him as a person."


The Setonian
News

Jumbos drop two in disappointing weekend

With playoff positioning hanging in the balance, the hockey team could not respond. The squad traveled to ninth place Wesleyan last Friday only to fall 5-3. It followed that up Saturday with an 8-3 defeat at the hands of the Trinity Bantams. After losing these two key games, the Jumbos head into next weekend's NESCAC playoffs with a mediocre 7-10-4 record. After they had already clinched a playoff spot, the Jumbos headed into the weekend with hopes of improving their seeding position. But after losing to a very beatable Wesleyan team Friday, Tufts pinned its hopes on beating NESCAC power Trinity. "We definitely came out more ready to play Saturday than we did against Wesleyan," senior co-captain Mike Carceo said. "But they started hot and we just couldn't catch up." The hot start was a first period in which the Bantams outshot the Jumbos 16-8. After having played the third period of the game the night before, junior goalie Ben Crapser was starting his first game since coming back from his leg injury. Amidst the plethora of shots he faced in the first period, he surrendered three goals, two of them coming on the Bantams' power play. It was 3-0 heading into the first intermission. "I don't know how comfortable Ben was in net after being out for so long," Carceo said. "But we shot ourselves in the foot with those penalties, and a good team like Trinity will always capitalize, regardless of who's in net." The second period was far more even. Both teams played a highly offensive style of hockey and each had 16 shots on net. Sophomore Shawn Sullivan notched his 12th goal of the year to start the scoring in the second period and trim the gap to 3-1. But Trinity brought the Jumbos back to reality. Ryan Stevens netted what proved to be the game winner a mere 21 seconds after Sullivan's tally. Carceo made the score 5-2 with a goal 12:25 into the period, but the goal proved irrelevant as the Jumbos skated to the locker room after the second down 6-2. Freshman goaltender Tim Kane saw action for most of the third period as Crapser was pulled after the eighth goal. Freshman forward Ken Cleary scored the final Jumbos goal with 5:39 in the third to "narrow" the final score to 8-3. Tufts did out shoot Trinity 10-7 in the third, giving the Jumbos something positive to take with them into next weekend. "We didn't play as poorly as the score indicates in the Trinity game," sophomore forward John Hurd said. "There were just a few defensive and mental mistakes that were too much to overcome." The Jumbos were actually pleased with their performance against Trinity due to the sub-par performance they had put out the night before against Wesleyan. For the first two and a half periods, the Jumbos were flat and allowed Wesleyan to hold a 4-1 lead. Freshman goalie Matt Ninneman had been removed from the game after the second period and was replaced by Crapser. "We didn't come to play from the start," Hurd said. "We had no intensity and we were simply getting outworked." Then, something clicked half way through the final period. Freshman defenseman Jack Thompson notched his first goal of the year on the power play at the 10:57 mark. The Jumbos continued to carry play and, seven minutes later, Thompson scored his second goal not only of the game, but of the year. It was now a completely different game with the score at 4-3. But Tufts' effort was too little too late. The Jumbos called timeout and pulled their goalie with a minute left, only to see Wesleyan score an empty net goal to seal the Jumbos fate. "We only played ten minutes of good hockey," Carceo said. "Good teams play the whole game, and we didn't do that." Hurd echoed Carceo's feelings. "We were only there physically and mentally for the last half of the third period," Hurd said. "We just weren't there the rest of the night. We just beat ourselves." The team now has a week to lick its wounds as it prepares for Saturday's tilt at Middlebury. The Jumbos lost 6-2 against Middlebury in Vermont on Jan. 10. "We'll go over the Middlebury game tape this week," Carceo said. The team is putting this past weekend behind it, and focusing its attention on the job it has ahead of it on Saturday. "We're going up against one of the best teams in the country," Carceo said. "They pack that arena, so it will be a great atmosphere. As poorly as we've played recently, we're real excited for this opportunity. We have to make the best of it."


The Setonian
News

Injury details unclear

Though Tufts administrators continue to keep a close eye on fraternities here, freshman Zeta Psi pledge Sebastian Gonzalez's injury last Thursday night doesn't spell an end to the Greek system. As Dean Reitman pointed out, the incident serves as a good indication that the planned Office of Greek Life is clearly needed here. Because details about Gonzalez's injury _ and whether or not the Zeta Psi party was an unofficial pledge event _ are still unclear, fraternity members and Tufts administrators aren't saying much. About the only certain matter is that the University will likely take action against Zeta Psi for serving alcohol to a minor. In recent years, Tufts has joined with city officials in bringing fraternity presidents to court over similar charges. The bigger issue, of course, is whether or not Gonzalez's injury was a result of hazing. Though Zeta Psi members insist that nothing of the sort happened Thursday night, there are mixed reports about the issue. If it turns out that pledges were engaged in the drinking game described by some students, Zeta Psi could face derecognition. With many fraternity and sorority members concerned about a perceived lack of confidence from the University, it is easy to see how an Office of Greek Life would prove beneficial in a situation like this. The Greek administrator heading the office could arguably enjoy a better dialogue with fraternity members than higher-level administrators like Reitman. Though any decision concerning Zeta Psi would probably not change even if channeled through another administrator, many fraternity members have expressed support for the creation of the Greek life office. A speedy search process for an office head would be beneficial to all involved with the Greek system.



The Setonian
News

Jumbos dominate Middlebury in NESCAC quarterfinals

The men's basketball team defeated the Middlebury Panthers this past Saturday afternoon 89-81 at Cousens gymnasium in the quarterfinals of the NESCAC tournament. The third seeded Jumbos will now move on to the conference semi-finals to face the second seeded Williams Ephs, who defeated Bates 85-69, next Saturday afternoon at Amherst College. "Today's game was a battle of two good teams," coach Bob Sheldon said. "In the end, however, because of the [non-conference] teams we've played this season and the toughness of our schedule, we were mentally tougher than they were. That's what it came down to." Both teams came out looking sharp early. There were ten lead changes in the first four minutes of play alone. The two teams continued to trade baskets for the majority of the first half, with neither going up by more than six points at any one time. After trailing for the last eight minutes of the first half, senior co-captain Brian Shapiro drilled a three pointer with just one second left with a hand in his face from two feet behind the line to give Tufts a 41-39 lead going into intermission. Whatever Sheldon told his team at halftime worked. The Jumbos came out with much more intensity in the second half, especially on the defensive end of the court. On the opening possession of the second twenty minutes, junior guard Deyvehn East sent a bullet over to sophomore center Craig Coupe who laid it in giving the Jumbos a four point lead. Middlebury took the lead 43-44 with 17:05 left in the second half, but that was the last time the Panthers would find themselves on top. Tufts went on a 12-4 run over the next three minutes, including two three pointers by Shapiro that broke the game open. The Panthers refused to give up, and cut the lead to five points with 11:53 remaining after a three-pointer by junior Nate Anderson. Sequential buckets by Wilson and freshman forward Blaine Lay put the Jumbos up by ten points once again, but Middlebury refused to go away, reducing the lead to seven with just nine minutes to go. Tufts' next offensive possession proved to be the dagger in the heart for Middlebury. With 5:30 left, the Jumbos inbounded the ball coming out of a timeout. Middlebury's tight defense did not allow Tufts to get a good look, and East was forced to send up a prayer as the shot clock expired. The shot barely nicked the rim, and Coupe hauled in the rebound and brought down the house with a thunderous jam to give Tufts a ten-point lead. "I think that Coupe's dunk was the turning point of the game," Shapiro said. "It got the fans going, it got our bench up, and it got the players that much more pumped." Tufts maintained a double-digit lead for the next four minutes, but Middlebury refused to go away. With 1:08 left and the Jumbos up by 11, the Panthers hit a three-pointer to cut the lead to eight. They immediately fouled Wilson, who calmly sunk both free throws. They scored a quick two, and then fouled McGlynn, who went 1-2 from the line. After hitting a quick three pointer to cut the lead to six, the Panthers fouled Wilson again, who sank two more foul shots, putting Middlebury away for good. The Jumbos out-rebounded Middlebury 50-37, and limited the usually lethal Panthers to just 23 percent shooting from behind the arc. Tufts got solid contributions from all of its players. Coupe led the team with 19 points and 13 rebounds, while Shapiro poured in 17 and Stovell had a solid outing with 16 points and 14 rebounds. Wilson added thirteen and also went 7-8 from the foul line in the last minute to seal the deal for Tufts. "We finally played today as a team, and we picked a good time to do it," Shapiro said. "It was nice to finally play together to our potential because we knew last weekend, we didn't play our best. It just feels good."


The Setonian
News

Combined-degree program difficult, but desirable to some

Imagine coming to college with no intention of graduating within four years, and having to fulfill the requirements for two separate degrees from two entirely different schools. For the students in the Tufts/School of the Museum of Fine Arts (SMFA) five-year combined-degree program, this dual college experience is not so difficult to imagine. Students in the combined-degree program receive a Bachelor of Fine Arts (BFA) and Bachelor of Arts (BA) upon graduation. Of course, this is after they have completed the requirements of a normal Tufts student _ completion of the foundation, distribution, and concentration credits. This works out to a minimum of 24 academic credits. In addition to fulfilling a normal Tufts course load, Tufts/SMFA students must also complete 30 credits of studio art classes and six courses of art history. Each degree, which normally take four years to complete on its own, are completed at the same time but within five years. For the first two and a half years, students focus on their Tufts degree, usually taking four academic courses and one studio art course. For the last two and a half years, they focus on their art requirements, taking two academic classes and three art studio classes. So why would someone submit themselves to this kind of workload? Students must fulfill two degrees at the same time, stay on an extra year after their friends graduate, take a 45-minute shuttle, sometimes more than four times a week between Tufts and the Museum School. One asks, "Is it worth it?" Students in the program definitely agree that it is. The program started up unofficially in the late 1970's and early 80's. It finally became official due to student demands. "These students wanted the best of worlds, strong academics and a chance to fully develop their artistic abilities. They are truly ambitious," the Program Advisor and Dean of Academic Affairs at the Museum School Susan Lush said. Caitlin Dalton, a freshman, gave a similar reason for applying to the program. "I didn't want to give up my arts, and I didn't want to give up my academics. I chose this program because it let me keep both." Students in the program are able to take any class at Tufts, as well as any of the courses offered at The Museum School, such as photography, sculpture, ceramics, printmaking, paper making, sound art, and film. Of course, while the connection between a Tufts degree and a Fine Arts degree may not be obvious at first, some students in the program find that both their majors supplement each other. One Tufts/SMFA student majoring in Peace and Justice Studies, and concentrating in video and film at the Museum School, finds that both of her concentrations actually complement each other. She uses film and video to make political statements in a creative and effective manner. This isn't to say that combined-degree students are never frustrated with the program. One unanimous complaint among students is the long shuttle ride back and forth to the Museum School. Another major complaint would be the lack of communication between both schools. Both schools run under entirely different computer systems, so when students begin to enroll in the Museum School full-time after two and a half years, they may have trouble transferring credits or getting the right amount of financial aid. Susan Lush also admits that most faculty members as well as students at Tufts "have no idea about how the program works, or even of the existence of the program." The lack of publicity is unfortunate, Lush says, since Tufts University is the only school to offer this kind of program with the visual arts. The Tufts/SMFA program is quite small, having about 60 students in it currently. And what lies ahead for these unique students after they graduate? "They all do so many things," Lush said. "I'm actually writing recommendations for a student that wants to go to law school."


The Setonian
News

Language of the modern age, part I

I was talking to a friend recently when she compared her relationship with her boyfriend to Ross and Rachel's. She made no reference to who Ross and Rachel were, no acknowledgment that they were characters in a television sitcom (NBC's Friends). It was a seamless transition from reality to fantasy and back to reality, and I realized in horror that I had followed and understood without the slightest pause. I can't deny that I've watched the uber-successful yuppie saga, but I would not consider myself an expert in any respect. And yet I accepted the allusion as though it were real, as though Ross and Rachel were two of my very best friends. It occurred to me then that what she said should have meant nothing to me. I don't even know anyone named Ross. In fact, I became frightened at my ability to unwittingly confuse fact and fiction, and moreover, recognize instantaneously the most cryptic reference to pop culture. I had once thought something like that was beneath me; apparently it wasn't. The incident and the resulting eerie epiphany led me to examine the gibberish that we young adults use to communicate with one another. Half of what we say is essentially inane, and I must say reflects quite poorly on us as a whole. I hate to think that the word I most associate with our generation is whatever. Consider the following words and phrases: SUV, fo' shizzle, Slater pants. All parts of the modern vernacular, and all inherently silly. Regardless, they mean something to us, and their significance extends beyond definition. They are representations of a common symbolism. Ours is a vocabulary of shared experience. And one salient theme threads its way through this lexicon of lingo: consumption. The terms that bind us together are underscored by a culture of TV, technology and commerce. The personalities that invade our thoughts are not just politicians, artists and scientists. Quite the contrary, a great many people who come up in daily discussion aren't even real. They are figments of Hollywood's imagination, and yet pillars of our collective existence. We have so many friends in common whom we will never-and, indeed could never-meet. Zack Morris and Kelly Kapowski. Brenda and Brandon Walsh. Billy Madison. Ren and Stimpy. The list goes on. The interaction of movie magic and some wondrous obsession with the unreal has allowed us to adopt these fictional characters into our national community. And many probably don't realize they're doing it. (I didn't.) Meanwhile, new technologies become increasingly pervasive, and new vocabularies grow out of our familiarity with them -- and dare I say dependence on them. Computers have spawned a language all their own. From hard drive to dot com to download, computer and internet technology are augmenting English with its novelty and complexity. Even within the simple concept of instant messaging, a new way of speaking has been invented. LOL, brb, ttyl, g2g and countless other alphabetical experiments are replacing the words we all relied upon until now. But a vocabulary based on computer or computer-esque components is nothing new to us. Think video games. Since grade school, gamers great and small have struggled over ways to "beat a level" or "get another life." The meanings of words we already know have changed dramatically and we haven't seemed to notice. Have you ever stopped to think how perverse it is to lose a life and just keep going? Scary to think, and yet in the world of Mario and Luigi (our old buddies), a life is a precious commodity only when you don't have ten more stored as backups. And as children have access to such technologies at younger and younger ages, they are growing up more and more comfortable using this video game parlance. My two younger brothers, 18 and nine years old, respectively, have become hooked, as of late, on Dead or Alive (DOA), a martial arts fighting game for the new X-Box. Their mastery of button combinations to create specific attack and defense moves makes their discussion of the game entirely indecipherable to an over-the-hill layman like myself. "Up, right, up, b, x, down, a, y" actually means something to them. Go figure. Meanwhile, technology-based vocabulary has even changed with the times according to the evolution of certain products. The Sport Utility Vehicle (SUV) is not a new concept, but the terms we use have changed. When we were younger they were Jeeps. Then four-by-fours. In fact, if you watch Goonies, the '80s classic adventure, you'll hear them say ORV -- off road vehicle. But now they're SUVs. Period. It's funny to think that once BetaMax was a symbol of modern advancements in film and video viewing, when now the term has been relegated to the ranks of dinosaur and punchline. What does this say about our society? I shudder to think. But truth be told, there's something to be said for a language that transcends time and space, that ties me to my contemporaries. So to Bart, Doogie, Screech, Yoshi and all the other luminaries of my formidable years, I say, thank you, and peace, I'm outty.


The Setonian
News

Senators continue outreach efforts

In an attempt to increase their accessibility, members of the Tufts Community Union Senate are currently developing a bylaw that would divide the student body into groups and assign a senator to represent each group. The Outreach Responsibilities bylaw passed earlier this month assigns a senator to every student group on campus. But to reach all students, not just those involved in activities, the senate will divide the student body into groups of between 120 and 150 students and assign each one a senate representative. "Every student's input should be heard, and we are placing more of a focus on student needs," explained Senator Josh Belkin, who is spearheading the project, along with Matt Pohl. "We've perceived some dissatisfaction for not having the best record of student outreach in the past." Undergraduates will be contacted by their representative senator via mass e-mail, most likely on a monthly basis. Students will have access to their senator's contact information as well. The senators are also considering more personalized means of outreach. "We may try to organize some dorm meetings, just so these students will know that they have a go-to person," Belkin said. According to freshman Senator Rafi Goldberg, the senators will not be overly obtrusive. "We don't want to annoy people with massive amounts of e-mail every week; no junk," he said. "We will focus on those students who express interest and concern and [who] want the most out of this system." This initiative should be especially helpful to freshmen and transfer students, proponents of the project say. Juniors who go abroad will also be assigned a Senate representative, Pohl said. "The Senate wants to know about how these students have been impacted by culture shock and their overall overseas experience," he said. The Senate is going to try to have "go-to senators" reach out to students of the same class, but the relatively small number of upperclassmen senators makes this difficult. One of the options is to increase the size of the upperclassmen groups, probably grouping together junior and seniors with whatever upperclassman senator is available, Belkin explained. The Senate will be directing more attention to the project after spring break. "We are going to try and get everything down on paper by the end of this year and hopefully implement it next year," Belkin said. "This is a step toward ongoing communications between the Senate and the student body."


The Setonian
News

What are they smoking?

While the Tufts administration's proposed ban on smoking in all dormitories sounds moral and high-minded, it strikes this student at an attempt by the University to restrict the rights of students within their place of residence and legislate their private behavior. The bottom line is that the current Tufts smoking policy is perfectly reasonable. It requires that any student wishing to smoke cigarettes in his or her dorm close the door, get approval from all roommates, and open the window. No freshmen are forced to live with a smoker unless they choose to do so. So there are only two possible motives for a University ban on dorm room smoking. The first is that they hope to help students quit smoking. Unfortunately, the Daily itself shot this idea down as "unlikely," despite its support for the policy. The second would be the idea that second hand or environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) creates a serious health risk. Unfortunately there is little data to back this up. All dorms are equipped with smoke detectors and fire risk is minimal. The idea that exposure to ETS increases risk for lung cancer is a wide-held belief, one that has led to restaurant and bar smoking bans. What has been overlooked by Tufts is that these bans were implemented to protect employees (waiters and bartenders) from potentially deadly ETS, not patrons. These employees faced eight hour shifts in a confined, smoke filled environment five or six days a week, a drastically different experience than that faced by any non-smoking Tufts students. There is no scientific consensus that occasional and limited exposure to ETS causes any statistically significant increase in relative risk for lung cancer, heart disease, or other smoking-related illness. It also appears that, in general, there has been a rush to judgment about the actual risks associated with ETS. The Environmental Protection Agency's landmark 1993 report concluded that ETS was responsible for 3,000 lung cancer deaths each year. This report served as a motivation for many municipalities in enacting their smoking bans. Unfortunately a considerable portion of this report has been vacated by a federal judge due to "cherry picked" data and "gross manipulation of scientific procedure and scientific norms." What subsequent studies have determined is that ETS poses a significant risk only through prolonged exposure (such as that of a spouse or child of a smoker). Certainly walking through the halls and getting an occasional whiff of stale cigarette smoke does not qualify as a significant health risk. The only health risk is that posed to the smoker and his or her roommates. I urge ResLife and the TCU to reconsider this policy and focus on more creative ways to accommodate both smokers and the smoke-free students on this campus. Daniel Kahn (LA '05)


The Setonian
News

Zeta Psi pledge in hospital

A Zeta Psi pledge was still in intensive care last night at the Tufts New England Medical Center after sustaining head injuries while drunk. The student, freshman Sebastian Gonzalez, was injured after returning to a dorm from a party at the fraternity Thursday night. Neither the hospital nor the Dean of Students Office would comment on his current condition. Gonzalez's parents were in Boston this weekend to be with their son. Students who attended the party at Zeta Psi reported that any time a Zeta Psi brother shrugged his shoulders, the pledges had to drink. Some said that by 11 p.m., many of the pledges were already vomiting. Zeta Psi President Peter Schaefer, however, denied the activity. While he was not at the party, Schaefer said he had talked to many of the brothers. "There was definitely no pledge event, and there was no hazing," he said. But fallout from Gonzalez's injury will probably land on the shoulders of Zeta Psi, since the fraternity was likely supplying Gonzalez, a minor, with alcohol. Dean of Students Bruce Reitman said that while the investigation into the events is just starting, his office plans to examine anyone who helped serve Gonzalez alcohol. Zeta Psi is not the only fraternity that may face pressure about hazing sometime soon. According to unconfirmed reports, a Delta Upsilon (DU) pledge has complained to the University about DU pledging activities. Both DU President Mike Ciacciarelli and Vice President Tom Mulcahy declined to comment. The Pachyderm, the Tufts student handbook, states that University regulations prohibit all forms of hazing, including "pressuring students to drink alcohol by means of drinking games or contests" and that the "consent of participants is not seen as a valid defense." Massachusetts State Law prohibits all forms of hazing as well, and whoever is a participant in "the crime of hazing" can be punished by up to $3,000 or a year in prison. However, the state's definition of hazing is not as strict as Tufts'. Universities, after all, have been held responsible for what goes on in fraternities. MIT paid $6 million to the family of Scott Krueger, who died in 1997 from alcohol poisoning while pledging Phi Gamma Delta. Tufts President Larry Bacow was an administrator at MIT at the time of Krueger's death. Yesterday, Reitman was not willing to say where Tufts investigation would be focused. "I won't know the details of that until it's done," he said. "I don't know how this will go." He said that the Dean of Students will have to examine Zeta Psi's involvement in Gonzalez's condition. Some fraternity brothers voiced concern this weekend that Gonzalez's situation would affect how the administration deals with the fraternities in future, and that it could cause a crackdown on the Greek system. But Reitman said that this one event will not change the administration's policy. "Ironically, [the system] was changing anyway," Reitman said. The administration has already been in the planning stages to create a new administrative position and an Office of Greek Life to deal with Greek life issues for several months. The new position, Reitman said, was created with the intended purpose of dealing with problems like this one. The president of Tufts' Inter Greek Council, Jessica Grasso, declined to comment before speaking to Reitman. Earlier this year, Bacow expressed concern about the current state of the Greek system at Tufts, saying that fraternities "must be more than just a place to party." He also said that fraternities "must do a better job" of cultivating fraternal values, leadership, and contributing to the community.


The Setonian
News

Can calcium cure PMS?

Women, and the men who suffer alongside them: take note. There may be a simple way to prevent or minimize PMS. Do you suffer from premenstrual syndrome (PMS) or know someone who does? Chances are you do, because PMS is estimated to affect 70 to 90 percent of women at some point during their childbearing years, and 30 million women regularly suffer the symptoms of PMS. Between 30 to 40 percent of women are thought to have PMS symptoms severe enough to interfere with their daily activities. Premenstrual syndrome is characterized by mild to moderate symptoms including abdominal cramping, breast tenderness, backache, general aches and pains, and bloating. It also includes mood changes such as fatigue, food cravings, mood swings, depression, anxiety, anger, crying, and insomnia. Typically, a woman will experience symptoms for two to four days before menstruation. However, some women may suffer for up to two weeks prior to getting her period. The severity and types of symptoms vary greatly from woman to woman. And each woman may have a different experience from month to month. Oftentimes PMS symptoms can be managed through exercise and dietary measures, such as eating a healthful diet, and limiting salty and sugary foods as well as caffeine and alcohol. Women seeking further treatment may be encouraged to keep a symptom diary for a minimum of three months in order to correlate symptoms with the menstrual cycle. The symptom diary can be used to diagnose PMS and lead to more focused and appropriate treatments. Several vitamin and mineral supplements are commonly used, however, research supporting their effectiveness is only preliminary. Some scientists believe that vitamins and minerals such as calcium, magnesium, and vitamin D are closely involved with the menstrual cycle, and their regulation within the body may be responsible for PMS symptoms. Before a woman gets her period, levels of the hormone estrogen peak, and some studies indicate that at the same time, blood levels of calcium decrease. If a woman is deficient in calcium to begin with, levels plunge even further at this time. Calcium levels may be lower in women with PMS and some researchers believe PMS symptoms are actually the result of low calcium levels (hypocalcemia). Symptoms of hypocalcemia include fatigue, anxiety, depression, memory problems, personality changes, neuromuscular irritability, and muscle cramps -- symptoms nearly identical to PMS. Some studies have shown that calcium supplements alleviate PMS symptoms. The doses used are often slightly higher than the 1000 mg recommended for women between the ages of 19 and 50. On average, however, women in this age group consume less than two thirds of this amount. The tolerable upper intake limit for calcium, or the dose at which calcium may have toxic effects, is 2500 mg/day. Some proponents of the calcium-PMS connection think that consistent calcium intake is extremely important and suggest a range between 1000 -- 1400 mg of calcium per day, every day. Maximizing calcium intake to minimize PMS can't hurt and might even help. In fact, most women could benefit from a calcium boost, which is also crucial for strong bones and preventing osteoporosis down the road. Women should aim for three good calcium sources each day. If you choose your calcium from the dairy group, eat low fat products such as skim milk or reduced fat yogurt. Good calcium choices include one cup of milk (300 mg), one cup of calcium-fortified soymilk or orange juice (300 mg), 3/4 cup of yogurt (300 mg), one ounce hard cheese (205 mg), one cup canned baked beans (130 mg), 1/2 cup ice cream (85 mg), 1/4 cup tofu made with calcium (125 mg), and 1/2 cup broccoli (35 mg). Information on the calcium content of foods is available at http://www.dialadietitian.org/resources/handouts/calciumlist.html. If you are unable to meet an adequate intake through diet alone, a calcium supplement is recommended. Calcium citrate is a very absorbable supplement, and is easy on the stomach. No more than 500 mg of calcium should be taken at one time, so it may be necessary to take two 500 mg tablets each day to meet your needs. Calcium-containing foods and supplements are relatively inexpensive in comparison to over-the-counter and prescription medications for PMS, safe in the amounts recommended to treat PMS, and accessible to the general population. If you have a tendency to retain water, you may want to limit salt during the premenstrual period. A healthful diet with enough calcium, limiting alcohol, not smoking, and exercising may prevent or reduce the symptoms of PMS.


The Setonian
News

Despite playoff disappointment, women's hoops season a success

Last season the women's basketball team finished 9-14 (1-8 NESCAC) under coach Janice Savitz. However, this season, the team smoked much of the non-conference competition and won three more conference games than in 2001-2002 to finish 17-7 (4-5 NESCAC) under first year coach Carla Berube. Unfortunately, the team's season came to an abrupt conclusion last Saturday at Bates with an 80-59 loss to the Bobcats in first round NESCAC tournament play. A man once said success is measured in championships. But for this season's squad, a championship was not needed for success. Winning eight more games than the previous season is a clear improvement. "This season was amazing," junior guard Maritsa Christoudias said. "We were successful because we were able to put together a handful of uncertainties into a great team, and our record is just a byproduct of that." The team was able to win with a much younger team than last season. 2001-2002's squad had two seniors on its roster. Captain Hillary Dunn was the only senior on this year's team. Also, one of last year's top scorers (Jayme Busnengo) graduated, and seniors Emily Goodman and Erin Harrington chose not to return to the team this season. With that, the team was forced to rebuild under a first year coach and a young roster. They boasted two freshmen, Julia Verplank and Jessica Powers, who get substantial playing time. "As for the freshmen, they did a great job this year," Christoudias said. "They all stepped into big roles and played their hearts out. They brought the water in everyday, but other than that, we didn't look at them as 'freshmen' when we were on the court. They were great for team chemistry and brought a lot of talent to this team." Christoudias also believes this season was a success because the team adjusted to many new lineups, a new coach, and new players. This led to uncertainty as to what to expect from a team that did not even make the NESCAC playoffs last season. "We didn't look as far off into the schedule this season," Christoudias said. "We tried to just take one game at a time, and depended on all our work falling into place by the end of the season." This season started off on the wrong foot as the squad dropped its first non-conference game 61-49 against RPI at the MIT Tip-Off Classic. With the ghosts of last season lurking, Christoudias still believed the team would do well this season. "Obviously it was hard to start the season with a loss," Christoudias said. "But we had a lot to put together in very little time. That game was more of a test than a forecast of the season. But looking back we learned to play together very quickly, and if we were to play RPI again I know the outcome would be different." The RPI game proved almost flukish, as no other non-conference team defeated Tufts for the rest of the season. After the defeat, the squad knocked down a team record: beating nine opponents in a row. The Jumbos won many of those contests easily, but had some close calls against MIT (61-56 OT W), Wellesley (56-51 W), and Smith (60-57 W). The Jumbos started off their NESCAC season on the softer side of life against Connecticut College, who ended up last in the NESCAC this season. The Jumbos handled the Camels, 86-56. After winning nine in a row, the team knew it was going to have a tough time with Wesleyan, who defeated Tufts 65-60 the previous season. The Jumbos controlled the game for 39 minutes, but in the last minute the Cardinals mounted a run to force the game into overtime. In the extra period, Wesleyan triumphed by three points, 79-76. "We knew it was going to be a good game, and never doubted that if we played our game we could beat them," Christoudias said. "That game could have gone either way, we just ran out of time." The Wesleyan game was symbolic for the season, as the Jumbos controlled many games into the final minutes. Some they won and others they lost. The team played well at home with a 10-2 record in Cousens Gym which included a huge 66-59 win over Bates, who was seeded third in the NESCAC tournament. On the flip side, they had some spotty play on the road as they went 6-4 including a disappointing 63-40 loss at Amherst, who finished ninth in the conference. "Amherst played their best game and we played our worst game that day, but also playing at home is a huge advantage for us," Christoudias said. Towards the end of the season, the Jumbos won games they were supposed to win and lost those in which they were underdogs. Non-conference teams such as Clark and Lasell posed little competition, but league opponents such as Colby and Bowdoin overmatched the squad. On the last weekend of regular season play, the Jumbos had two character building games. The team beat Middlebury 69-58 for the first time since the two teams started playing each other on a seasonal basis in 1993. On the downside, the Jumbos fell to Williams 69-61 after being up by 16 points with 18 minutes left in the contest. Nevertheless, the Jumbos made the playoffs, unlike last season. The team only loses one senior, Dunn, after this year. No two seasons are exactly similar, but with a core of solid players returning next season, the women's basketball program should be on the up and up. "Well we're gonna miss Hill [Dunn] a lot," Christoudias said. "She was our lone senior and did a lot for this team, but the rest of us are young. With the experience of this season I'm sure we will be ready to step it up even more, but we don't know what our team will be until next year. Meanwhile we can bask in what we did this season."


The Setonian
News

Sometimes it's bigger than the music

Earlier this year, a group of volunteers came together to create Respond II, the second in a series of benefit CD collections organized by Catalyst Disc/Signature Sounds. This two-disc set, which features female artists from all branches of the musical spectrum, who donated their songs for use in the collection, sets out to spread its message of female power and strength while raising money for victims of domestic violence. Respond II is unique in that it represents a rare show of solidarity in the music business. The wide spectrum of artists highlighted in the collection, including Dolly Parton, Ani DiFranco, Joan Baez, and Sleater-Kinney, speaks out against domestic violence and carries on the collection's theme of staying strong in the face of adversity. With songs ranging in genre from Latin pop to bluegrass to rock and roll, Respond II truly features something for everyone, reaching out to all sorts of music fans in an attempt to spread its message. It is worth noting that all profits resulting from sales of the album will go directly to RESPOND, Inc., one of the first countrywide programs to offer support to victims of domestic violence, as well as the Family Violence Prevention Fund (FVPF), the premier national organization fighting to prevent domestic abuse. Both groups serve thousands of women per year and strive for laws to better protect battered women and children. The collection itself opens with "Lily", a song by noted folk singer and activist Joan Baez, whose dedication to civil rights and the anti-war movement stretches all the way back to her days protesting the Vietnam War. "Lily" is a gentle, upbeat number that features Baez's smooth voice and sets an uplifting tone for the rest of the album. It is followed by "Steady Pull" by Jonatha Brooke, a more contemporary piece with a laid-back feel, and the Indigo Girls' "She's Saving Me", which demonstrates flowing lyrics that settle well against an acoustic guitar harmony. The first disc also features several upbeat Latin pop numbers, including Ely Guerra's "Yo No" and Angelique Kidjo's energetic rendition of "Tumba". The mixture of styles, ranging from the aforementioned pop and country to songs such as "You're No Rock 'N' Roll Fun" by Sleater-Kinney create a shifting medley of tunes that translate well to the album's stated purpose, promoting a unity of voices across the female spectrum. Patty Griffin, whose roots lie originally in Cambridge, stands out with her short bluegrass piece "Chie". The first disc is capped by the haunting lyrics of "Silver", sung by Meghan Toohey and The So and Sos. The second disc starts off with the smooth tones of Suzanne Vega's "Luka," a beautiful piece that continues the laid-back mode of the previous album. This is followed by "Mountain Top", sung by Toshi Reagon, which features haunting bluegrass melodies that soar over the beautiful rhythmic harmonies and make the piece one of the prominent songs of the collection. Sarah McLachlan's "Witness" and Dolly Parton's "Endless Stream of Tears" both add a more contemporary flavor to the album, and Tracy Bonham's short feature, "I'm No Giant", showcases her unique lyrical ability and vocal talents. The second disc does a good job of picking up where the first left off, though it features many more energetic songs, like Erin McKeown's "Queen of Quiet", and finally culminates in the riveting "More Love" by Wannetta Jackson. Taken as a whole, the collection is well-produced, with a wide distribution of songs from myriad different styles. Fans of all genres should be pleased with the dual albums and featured artists. Though some songs seem to drag a bit at times, and the first disc features a few too many slow pieces to really work up an energetic mood, Respond II is overall a solid album and a necessary addition to any CD collection, especially for fans of female artists.


The Setonian
News

Faculty members speak out against Bush

At a faculty meeting earlier this month several members voiced their opposition to the choice of George H. W. Bush as the Fares Lecturer. At the AS&E Faculty Meeting on Feb. 6 faculty members questioned the choice of Bush and the entire selection process for the Lecture Series. One of the complaints was the lack of balance in the selection of speakers -- the majority of them hold conservative views. Faculty called for more "balanced representation." After the meeting, a member of the political science department, who asked to remain anonymous, said that there were definitely "strong reactions among the faculty" at the announcement of Bush as the lecturer. Bacow responded to faculty concerns at the meeting, saying that the roster of previous speakers from the lecture series shows that Tufts strives for "intellectual diversity." He said that there were similar reactions when former President Clinton spoke as part of the lecture series last year -- at the time those complaints stemmed from Clinton's moral character. "It is an interesting time to have [Bush] here," Bacow said. The controversy surrounding the Bush lecture is not limited to just faculty -- students have also voiced opposition and in conjunction with some faculty members and local activists will be protesting the lecture. The majority of the protestors are using this as a platform to demonstrate their disagreement with the conflict in Iraq; they have pointed out that the current administration contains many elements of Bush Sr. and that many of the policies being pursued resemble those of his term as president. Other students are pleased to see a high level personality coming to campus, "I think it is great that he is coming to Tufts," freshman Scott Lustig said. "And regardless of anybody's political preference, it would be terrible not to take advantage of his being here. He's not likely to change anybody's mind, but it's nice to have him here." The lecture series was started by Fares I. Fares (LA '93), a Tufts trustee and a member of the University's International Board of Overseers and the Board of Overseers for Arts & Sciences. The series is funded by the Fares Foundation and is held in honor of his father Issam M. Fares. The older Fares is a former Tufts trustee and the Deputy Prime Minister of Lebanon. Previous Fares lecturers have included Former President Bill Clinton, current Secretary of State Colin Powell, Lady Margaret Thatcher, James Baker, George Mitchell, and former French President Valery Giscard d'Estaing.


The Setonian
News

Extracurriculars help students make the grade

Senior Jocelyn Hall spent much of last weekend in the yearbook office in Curtis Hall, hurrying to finish the project before it's upcoming deadline. During the week, in addition to her work on the yearbook, she dances for Spirit of Color and is a student panelist at Admissions. Overall, Hall spends about 30 to 35 hours a week on her extracurricular activities, yet she studies for 12.5-15 hours a week and has maintained a GPA of over 3.75. A double major in computer science and art history, Hall is currently working on the project she must complete for the engineering degree. Though Hall's involvement in extracurriculars may be slightly more than that of the average student, her story is not atypical. A Daily survey conducted Feb. 18-22 suggests that academic performance is actually strengthened by out of class activities and that hours spent studying do not decrease with involvement in extracurriculars. The survey showed a direct correlation between the percentage of students in the higher GPA ranks and the amount of time they spend per week on extracurriculars. The results suggest that an individual's personality determines the number of hours he or she will spend on extracurriculars and academics, and the success that will be achieved in both. "I need multiple things going on, otherwise I won't be productive at anything," Hall said. Other respondents agreed that if they were not spending so much time on extracurriculars, it would not translate to increased studying. "Before I became heavily involved with extracurriculars at Tufts, I would spend a majority of my time not doing anything useful.... Now that my schedule is very packed, I am forced to be efficient with my time in order to balance my academics and my extracurriculars," wrote one student, a group vice president. "Contrary to what many professors believe, my GPA has actually gone up since my participation in extracurriculars." But this is not to say that every student who spends more time on extracurriculars will do better in the classroom. Many students do quit organizations because of a need to concentrate on academics, and students have to readjust the balance between hours of participation and academics each semester with academic demands. Students who do have trouble keeping up their grades are encouraged by the University to cut back their extracurricular commitments. According to the Pachyderm, students who are officers in organizations are supposed to be in good academic standing. Recent improvements in SIS online and better databases of organizations has enabled Student Activities Director Jodie Nealley to check on student officers' grades each semester -- though the process of doing so has never been consistent. "If an officer is on [academic] Probation 2 or Pro 3, we will ask them to put their academics first," Nealley said. These conversations, however, take place with only three or four students each semester. Students did not see that GPAs and hours spent on their extracurriculars are entirely exclusive, however. Of those surveyed, 30 percent of students did say that extracurriculars detract significantly from their academics. But of these students, almost all heralded the value of their extracurriculars in helping them develop skills they would not have gained from the classroom. "While I think that at times, I wish I had been able to spend some more time on my academics and improving my GPA, I don't think that I would have loved Tufts and become so connected to the school without all of my extracurricular involvement," wrote one student who maintains a GPA in the 3.5 to 3.74 range despite spending 20 to 25 hours on extracurriculars. Other students praised extracurriculars for teaching them practical skills that would help them obtain jobs or internships, leadership, the ability to work in groups and work with diverse people and personalities, and the ability to budget and manage money. Some students, however, noted a separation between the worlds of academics and extracurriculars at Tufts. Communication between professors and students, between different staff members, and between student organizations is a University-wide problem that furthers this split, Nealley said. But others already see the two as intertwined. One survey respondent wrote that it has been extracurriculars, not classes, that have encouraged personal relationships with professors. Another respondent, sophomore Brian Roiter, said his interest in Buddhism manifests itself in his extracurriculars, classes, and leisure time. Roiter has pursued that interest through discussions with religion Professor Joseph Walser and founded the Buddhist Sangha club with the help of a medical engineering professor. Roiter also got involved in Tufts Coalition to Oppose the War on Iraq at the suggestion of his physics professor, Gary Goldstein. "Most teachers encourage involvement," Roiter said. In activities where professors are involved, "the professors become more like students. It's more of a friendly basis. I see my professors as friends and not as superiors." There are ways to increase connections between the spheres of academics and extracurriculars, according to Nealley. Student-faculty-staff committees like the Committee on Student Life teach each category of people to consider the perspective of the others in the committee -- but few of these groups exist at Tufts. Nealley would also like to see freshman seminars similar to the Explorations/Perspectives program that are focused on academic issues but involve student life personnel and also discuss student life issues. "I always believe that we should be known as co-curricular instead of extra. These activities are parallel to a student's studies," Nealley said. Of the 80 students surveyed who participate in extracurricular activities more than 25 hours a week, 30 percent had a GPA over 3.75 and 40 percent had a GPA of 3.50-3.74. Those numbers decreased along with hours of participation. Of students with 15-20 hours spent on extracurriculars, 22 percent had GPAs over 3.75, 44 percent were in the 3.50-3.74 range, and 22 percent had GPAs between 3.00-3.49. The corresponding percentages for ten to 15 hours spent on extracurriculars were 17, 39, and 44 and for five to ten hours participation 8, 42, and 35. The average GPA at Tufts is around 3.4. Students who spend 25 or more hours on extracurriculars actually studied more hours than any other grouping in the survey. Of those students, 70 percent studied more than ten hours a week, while that number dropped to 55 percent for the 20 to 25 group, 33 percent for 15 to 20 hours, and 32 percent for 10 to 15 hours. It did go up slightly for the five to 10 hours group, to 42 percent.


The Setonian
News

Jumbos mauled by Bobcats

The women's basketball team's hopes for NESCAC glory were crushed by a red-hot Bates Bobcat squad 80-59 this past Saturday in Lewiston, ME. The sixth-seeded Jumbos were faced with a career performance by Bates sophomore Betsy Hochadel and failed to recover after giving up the lead early in their quarterfinal NESCAC tournament match. "We got into a little bit of a hole," freshman Jessica Powers said. "We went down by a few and couldn't get out of it; we couldn't score and they couldn't miss." Hochadel recorded a career-high 18 points coming off the bench for the Bobcats. She tied a NESCAC tournament record, making eight out of nine field goals. As a team, Bates set a new tournament record shooting an impressive 54.7 percent from the field. Fellow Bates sophomore Olivia Zurek also had a notable day, picking up her tenth double-double with 17 points and 12 rebounds. Bobcat senior co-captain Carla Flaherty had 14 points and six assists to aid in her squad's victory as well. Tufts began the game with the fire of a team ecstatic to be in the post season. "We were all very excited; there were a few nerves going in," Powers said. "We came out with a lot of intensity because it's pretty much do or die in the playoffs." The Jumbos jumped out to an early lead, stemming from a 9-2 run. Powers capped off the streak with a deep three-pointer, putting her squad up 19-12 just half way through the first twenty minutes. Bates suddenly picked up the pace, forcing several defensive mistakes by Tufts. Flaherty tied the game at 25 with 5:57 remaining in the half with a long jump shot. Bates then took the lead 30-29 with 2:51 left, and did not relinquish the advantage for the duration of the match. After the halftime intermission, Tufts showed signs of life by putting together a 7-0 run and coming within two points of lead, 40-38. Bates then counter attacked with 14 consecutive points in just under four minutes. Eight of these points resulted from four Jumbo turnovers. "There were a lot of unforced turnovers that didn't help us at all," Powers said. "We have had a problem with turnovers all season. We tried to minimize them, but had a couple too many." Tufts lost its steam as the Bobcats kept clawing their way farther and farther ahead. The Jumbos were downcast as the final seconds of their season ticked away and Bates came closer and closer to advancing in the tournament. "Everyone is sad not just because we lost, but because it's all over," Powers said. Despite the losing effort, Powers scored a team high 15 points and junior Maritsa Christoudias racked up 11 points and ten rebounds. The team on the whole, however, shot just 33.4 percent from the field. They made a mere four three pointers out of 21 attempts. Saturday's game was also the final time senior captain Hillary Dunn will put on a Tufts basketball uniform. "Everything we did this season was for her and to make her last year really special," Powers said. "I think it was [special] even though we lost. It will be hard to see her go. She really brought us all together and was a great leader. We had the best chemistry." With the win, third seed Bates moves on to the next round of the tournament to play second seed Wesleyan on Saturday. The Bobcats have turned up the intensity during the last part of the season winning five straight and nine of their last ten games. Wesleyan defeated seventh seed Middlebury 71-53 on Saturday to advance to the second round of the playoffs. Despite the loss, the Jumbos' solid 17-6 record and playoff berth show a drastic improvement from last season and also offer a firm foundation for years to come. "We had a great season and are sad that it's over," Powers said. "But we are going to workout in the off-season playing pickup and doing workouts. We're looking forward to next year."


The Setonian
News

Religious leaders speak on Muslim faith

In a continuing effort to spur dialogue and awareness among the Muslim community, the event "Seeking Solutions in Troubled Times," featured four nationally and internationally recognized Islamic scholars and active participants in the Islamic communities at Tufts, in Boston, and on the national level. The Muslim Students Association at Tufts (MSAT) sponsored the lecture, panel discussion, and fundraising dinner on Saturday evening in Cohen Auditorium. The speakers included Imam Zaid Shakir, Dr. Ingrid Mattson, Walid Sallam, and Hossam Al-Gabrithe. A brief prayer recited in Arabic and then in English marked the beginning of the lecture, which was then introduced by University Chaplain David O'Leary. He articulated the ongoing goal of combining reason and faith, and the importance of a university environment that is "open" and "a refuge for religious freedom, ideals, and liberty." O'Leary introduced the featured lecture speaker, Imam Zaid Shakir, as a man of notable scholarship and faith, a balance that O'Leary said was difficult to achieve in today's society. During his lecture, Shakir articulated his own opposition to the pending war on the Iraqi people using both informed rationale and points taken form the Holy Qur'an. Shakir, a scholar of both Islam and political science, converted to Islam in 1977. Shakir declared repeatedly the importance of the application of "justice," as he defined it. "Justice implies equity in ruling and in judging," he stated as he argued that "by nature of policy, this is an unjust war." He stressed also that while Sadaam Hussein is "a brutal dictator," this war would not eradicate him, but rather it would wreak havoc among innocent Iraqi civilians who would bear the brunt of the aftermath of war. He also noted that Hussein's primary victims have always been Muslims, and that large numbers of Muslims are completely opposed to this war. The consequences of a war would include chemical and nuclear waste and radioactive poisoning, Shakir said. The effects for the civilians, he said, would be similar to those which effect some veterans of the Gulf War, who suffer from what is now recognized as Gulf War Syndrome. The syndrome allegedly resulted from chemical exposure during the war. Shakir described today's situation as having "unprecedented challenges." He said that these are "critical times" for the world and for this country and demand the best in all of us, not the worst. While he described the organization of justice as both "subtle and difficult in nature," he said there were several points which define justice. Among these points were the importance of the impartial dispensing of rights, the incorporation of Divine law, moderation (justice should not be absolute, but distributive), and finally he stressed the common sense value of reciprocity ("If good is done, do good.") Shakir also addressed the ever hot topic of terrorism and its relation, or rather lack thereof, to Islam. He illustrated that terrorism is unjust because by Islamic law, "civilians cannot be killed in warfare." Terrorism, therefore, is not permitted by the law of equity. The issue of terrorism was also brought up in the question and answer session as one student asked how Shakir chose to react when people automatically assumed him to be a terrorist because of his Islamic faith. Shakir stressed again the importance of education, the ability for Muslims to have a voice, and of the need to give the public alternative forms of media and information. This idea of an Islamic voice was reiterated several times throughout the lectures and the intentions and goals of the event. Father David O'Leary expressed the invaluable worth of sparking a dialogue both here at Tufts and in the larger community. "Tufts really is a model for religious liberty," said O'Leary. "And the more we allow for dialogue the better we become as a university family." The panel discussion following the lecture featured Walid Sallam, the executive director of the Islamic Society in Boston, and Hossam Al-Gabrithe, the coordinator of the Muslim Society of Youth in Boston. The fundraiser dinner then featured Dr. Ingrid Mattson, the first female Vice President of the Islamic Society of North America. The student head of MSAT, Muhammed Zaid, said that events like this one strike up a formal debate, and with "high caliber" speakers such as Shakir, people are more apt to listen and learn about Islam. The most foreseeable way to spur an ongoing dialogue on campus, according to Zaid, is the prospect of a newly renovated Islamic Center on campus with adequate prayer space, a conference room and library, and offices. The new Center would create a space conducive to ongoing dialogue, prayer services, and an ideal setting for the Islamic community to develop a voice here on campus, Zaid said.


The Setonian
News

Dave Chappelle spouts off to the 'Daily'

Making his way from performing gigs at comedy clubs in Washington DC at the age of 14 to doing the same in New York, comedian Dave Chappelle finally worked his way to the big screen in Mel Brook's film, Robin Hood Men in Tights. In 2000, Chappelle's popularity soared after starring in his own one-hour stand-up comedy special. But according to Chappelle, his new television gig, entitled Chappelle's Show, is different from any other gig he has ever had. "I want to reach people my age," the 28-year-old Chappelle said. "Young people are the best for me because they are bolder." Chappelle challenges the boldness of his viewers on a weekly basis with Chappelle's Show. The half hour sketch-comedy show features four to five sketches per episode, with a musical guest to conclude it. Chappelle, along with co-writer Neal Brennan, who also helped him write the movie Half Baked, create skits with social commentaries that make you laugh and think at the same time. Although there is much laughter from the studio audience, neither Chappelle's humor nor his language is for the squeamish. Comedy Central gives Chappelle much more leeway than any other non-cable network by allowing extensive use of most curse words, without bleeping many out. "Cable gives me so much more freedom," Chappelle said. "Network is not bad, but it's not for me." Also in certain skits in his show, Chappelle uses the word "Nigger" as if it is going out of style, but to him it is not the inflammatory word many think of it to be. "I'm from that era where young brothers call each other the 'N-word' with no malice behind it," Chappelle said in defense of the flagrant use of the word in his skits. Not all skits handle such sensitive topics, however. The comical "Tyrone the Crackhead" features Chappelle garnished in filthy clothes and sporting white powder on his lips. Tyrone makes outlandish statements such as, "Do you know what dog food tastes like? Just like it smells -- delicious." Other fictional outtakes make more of social statement, such as how blacks would change if they received their reparations checks. "I don't do the show with the intention of making social commentary," Chappelle said. "Making the show funny is the main point." Chappelle's Show spans 30 minutes, and according to Chappelle, this is the only option. "I think it's short," Chappelle said. "Just to do that half an hour, that [expletive] is like murder." One of the aspects of Chappelle's Show that distinguishes itself from other sketch comedy is that Chappelle's has no set cast. There are some recurring members of the cast, but mainly Chappelle creates characters for a wide variety of actors. For example, Chappelle said if he knows somebody who does a good Denzel Washington impression, he will write a part for that person. Also, Chappelle's Show features musical guests at the conclusion of each episode. This season features such acts as Busta Rhymes, Fat Joe, The Roots, Talib Kweli, and GZA. As of now it does not appear as if Chappelle will eliminate the music segment of the show to make room for more skits. "Music is a huge part of my life," Chappelle said. "I'm a huge fan of hip-hop and like the commentary." Chappelle along with Brennan and Michelle Armour are the executive producers of the show. He feels he has a lot of power in determining what material goes into it and he is not forced to do anything that he doesn't feel comfortable doing. But, Chappelle notes that in opposition to stand-up comedy, his television life is "in general a much more cooperate life," meaning that he must work with more people to put out a polished product. Chappelle has taped ten episodes and is slated to tape two more in March. After that, Comedy Central is going to create a Best of Chappelle's Show episode to make 13 for the season.