Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Requiem' searches for something better in life

Life isn't fair. It's one of the first lessons that every human learns as a child, and it is a lesson forever found in western literature. Modern American literature, however, has embraced this, giving the public dozens of novels filled with cynicism and regret every year, many of them the cream of that year's literary crop. Hubert Selby, Jr., has been turning out brilliant, well-written novels for the past twenty years, but in 1978 he created one of the most unique examples of the American tragedy ever to appear on the shelves of a bookstore. Requiem for a Dream, recently re-released by Thunder's Mouth Press to celebrate the release of Darren Arronofsky's film adaptation this past September, lacks one simple element of the novel: it has no protagonist. Try as one might, it is impossible to find a hero within the pages of Selby's creation. Despite the lack of a hero, four principal characters dominate the imagery of the book, each one amazingly believable and uniquely characterized. The story, which takes place in the mid-seventies in Coney Island, Brooklyn, centers on Sara Goldfarb, an aging widow addicted to diet pills and desperate for perfection and adoration; Harold, her son, a junkie constantly searching for true happiness; Tyrone C. Love, Harold's best friend, a young African American in much the same position as Harold; and Harold's girlfriend, Marion, conquered by the streets and depression at an early age, and sometimes prostituted by local dealer and pimp, Angel. The plot is mundane - not the novel's strongest point - but it sets the stage for a poignant study of self-deprecation and the search for something better in life. The novel tells us of Sara's daily musings in her apartment, dreaming of fame and perfection, and of Harold, Tyrone, and Marion's dealings on the street, which culminate in their plan to steal a pound of pure heroin and become rich selling it. From the beginning of the novel, the reader establishes a deep pity for each character. Sara, with her dazed moments of staring at the TV and her conversations about self-improvement with her dead husband Seymour, is presented as one of the most pathetic personas in modern literature, and yet her "normal" position in life and seemingly standard situation is frightening. She could very well be any housewife in America, widowed or not. Harold and Tyrone, too, are eerily familiar to the late high school- or early college-aged boy. Each is given his own dialect, contrasting Harold's laid-back wonderings from Tyrone's haughty, Ebonics-flavored passages. This gives them more believability than most modern characters. With each character speaking in his or her own voice, it is easy to be drawn into the novel and see it as something real - to feel for each character and to truly experience with willful suspension of disbelief that every writer seeks to bring his or her readers. The story becomes a backdrop for this amazing character study, and draws the reader into the lives and desires of each of the novel's characters. Sara's obsession with fame and bodily perfection is painted as a desire for not only attention but for adoration and, ultimately, the love which she feels she has been denied not only since the death of her husband but for her entire life. The younger characters' actions are soon painted as a pointless and fruitless search for happiness in the realm of the material - they look for some release from their depression in sex, in drugs, and finally, in money. As the novel draws to a somewhat shocking and unexpected conclusion, the reader begins to realize that none of the characters are true heroes of the story. They are neither conquering nor being conquered in life - they simply are living. In the introduction to the September 2000 re-release, Darren Arronofsky addresses this issue in his new preface by saying that the principal character and hero of the story is addiction itself. It is very easy to see this when reading the novel, which centers around each character's addictions, for drugs, for sex, for love, and, ultimately, for happiness in life. With credible characterization, fast-paced plot work, and a deeply emotional message, Requiem for a Dream is a beautiful and amazingly well-crafted novel. The message of futility and grief is sure to bring to tears even the most stoic of readers.


The Setonian
News

Men's baseball looks to fill gaps

Any true fan will tell you that what happens when winter releases its grasp and the first buds bloom on the trees. In a word: Baseball. Baseball's unique hold on American culture is evident at Tufts, where in years past coach John Casey's teams have become not only one of the most feared Division III opponents, but one of New England's top programs. Last year's squad finished with an impressive 26-12 mark and a noteworthy 8-2 record against southern squads, teams with a distinct seasonal advantage. But to equal or surpass last season's success, the Jumbos' must overcome key personal losses. "We are a fairly young club," Casey said. "We're especially young on the mound. 130 innings of pitching is gone from last year; that was 40 percent of our pitching." Most of that pitching came from the graduated Zack Brown, who pitched his way to a 7-2 record last year and an impressive 1.41 earned run average. In 70 innings he only walked six men and received numerous national awards. "To be honest," sophomore shortstop Brian Shapiro said, "Zack Brown's shoes will be hard to fill." Nonetheless, the Jumbos have some quality arms. At the top of the rotation is Steve Lapham, a hard-throwing righty who, as a junior, has the most seniority on the staff. Behind Lapham will be Jon Lee, a right-handed sophomore with an excellent curveball. Lee struck out 45 men in 53 innings last season. An X-factor will be sophomore Dave Martin, who pitched inconsistently in limited action last season. "Dave has gotten some velocity this season," his catcher, co-captain Joe Surprenant, said. "He's getting the ball in, and he's really learning how coach Casey wants pitchers to pitch. He has good movement on his pitches," he said. Martin's elevated role cannot be overstated; he will pitch every third game and his ability to throw consistently behind Lee and Lapham could go a long way in determining Tufts' success. Behind Martin could be hard-throwing freshman Randall Newsom. "Randy has a decent curve, a good change, and a live fastball," Surprenant said. Shapiro saw action on the mound last year. Probably the team's hardest thrower, he will likely be utilized as a late-inning reliever. "There's a big difference between talent and performance," Casey said. "Our pitchers certainly have the talent to do good things, but there's a big difference between pitching with certainty ahead of you and having no pressure, and being a top guy. It's easy to win without expectations." If there is certainty on Casey's squad, it is in the outfield where are all three spots are filled. Co-captain, senior Todd Boutwell, who led the team with a .400 average last year, will start in left, while junior Dan Callahan will start in right. Patrolling the depths of center field will be sophomore Evan Zupancic. "Our outfield is shored up," Casey said. "They of course have to play well to hang on to their jobs, but right now they're the guys. Of course, a lot of pressure comes with that, and we'll know pretty soon how they'll handle it." But the outfield is the exception rather than the rule. The Jumbo pitching staff and infield are full of uncertainty. Co-captain Joe Surprenant will don the tools of ignorance. "Catching is a unique position," he said. "I really try to be the voice on defense." Junior Tim Ayres returns at first base after of a year in which he knocked in a solid 29 runs and hit .328. Shapiro will try to make the move back to his home at shortstop. "I played short all my life until last year," Shapiro said. "I feel more comfortable there. I'm just happy coach is giving me the opportunity." Second base, third base, and the designated hitter slot will not be filled until this coming week. Seniors Kevin Marotta and Cory Dolich, and freshman Nick Pelange, who has played well at second according to Casey, will compete for playing time. The 2001 edition of Tufts baseball travels down south on Friday with many questions unanswered. Unfortunately for Tufts, the Jumbos will be forced to take the field for games that count without the benefit of many outdoor practices. "It's tough," Surprenant said. "Our outfielders haven't shagged flies yet, we haven't been outside all year, and we're playing teams with records like 9-2, 10-2." "That's the nature of baseball in the northeast," Casey said. We don't have time to complain about it because we get down there and start playing. Guys have to seize the jobs; there's no time for easing into anything. All the games count down South, so we can't dig ourselves a hole."


The Setonian
News

Sox lose series to Royals but end up with strong April record April

For Sox fans at Tufts, the headaches caused by spring fling hangovers were intensified by ugly pitching performances by Paxton Crawford and Derek Lowe. The Boston Red Sox dropped their second game in a row for the first time this year and two out of three to the Kansas City Royals over the weekend. The warm weather seems to have caused Boston's starting rotation to take a vacation, as pitchers who have been solid all season fell apart this weekend. Crawford lasted only two innings in his outing yesterday, and Ohka earned his first loss of the season on Saturday. Even Pedro Martinez has had trouble finding his groove, and is only 2-0 in five starts this season. The loss caused the Sox to lose control of the AL East, with Toronto moving half a game ahead with a win over Anaheim. Despite this weekend's pitching woes, Boston finished April with a stellar 16-9 record. The Red Sox started the series with the Royals on a good note on Friday night, as Carl Everett led Boston to a 9-2 slugfest victory. Manny Ramirez and Troy O'Leary launched back-to-back homers in the fifth inning to make it 4-1 Red Sox. Kansas City came back for one in the top of the sixth, but Boston broke the game open in the bottom of the inning on an RBI single by Trot Nixon and Everett's second grand slam of the week. Frank Castillo continues to be a solid number three starter for the Red Sox. He secured his third straight victory by holding the Royals to two runs and six hits in five and one-third innings. Rolando Arrojo pitched the rest of the game to earn his third save. On Saturday, it looked like the circus had come to Fenway Park and the clowns were playing in the infield. The Red Sox, who came into the game tied with the Seattle Mariners for fewest errors this season, committed five blunders in the first six innings as they handed the Royals an 8-2 victory. The errors lead to five unearned runs, including the go-ahead run in the third. Kansas City's Mark Quinn had a home run and three RBIs for the Royals Manny Ramirez went hitless to end his eight-game hitting streak. The Red Sox runs both came in the second on a Shea Hillenbrand triple that scored Jason Varitek and an RBI ground-out by Brian Daubach that sent Hillenbrand home. The Royals took the lead on a Daubach fielding error in the third and added two runs in the sixth after an Ohka throwing mistake. Mike Sweeney made it 6-2 with a single in the seventh inning, and Kansas City got two more runs in the top of the ninth on the Quinn homer and an RBI double by Dee Brown. Ohka (2-1) gave up four hits and one earned run in five and two thirds innings. Kansas City starter Dan Reichert allowed six hits over six innings to earn his third win in a row. Sunday's game featured more plot twists, turns, and horrors than a Wes Craven movie. The lead flip-flopped between the two teams until the 11th inning when Kansas City's Joe Randa hit a three-run home run to give the Royals the victory. The Red Sox opened the scoring in the bottom of the first when Ramirez launched a bomb over the screen on the Green Monster for a three-run homer in the bottom of the first. But the Royals exploded for six runs off Crawford in the top of the second inning, making the score 6-3. Ramirez had his second homer of the game and ninth of the season in the sixth to knock Kansas City starter Brian Meadows out of the game. Kansas City made the score 7-4 with a run in the top of the seventh, but chaos broke loose in the bottom of the inning. The Red Sox loaded the bases with no outs, and Ramirez grounded a fielder's choice to second that scored Stynes. When Royals shortstop Ordaz tried to throw out Ramirez, he missed and threw the ball into the dugout, allowing Nixon to score. Two batters later, Scott Hatteberg homered to center to give the Red Sox a 8-7 lead. Ramirez's RBI was his 31st for the month of April, the most RBI in the month for a Red Sox player since 1949. Hillenbrand was four for five during the game and has hit safely in 23 of the Red Sox's 25 games this year. But the see-sawing of the score did not end there, as Boston closer Derek Lowe continued his demise in the top of the ninth. He gave up a home run to Jermaine Dye to send the game into extra innings. Lowe gave up the homer to Randa in the eleventh. Kansas City's Roberto Hernandez pitched the bottom of the inning for the save. Jose Santiago was the winning pitcher. The Red Sox have an off-day tomorrow and will head to Seattle for a three-game series later this week.


The Setonian
News

Make a little love

Feeling optimistic? You probably did when you grabbed a handful of condoms passing the VISIONS display yesterday on your way into Dewick or Carmichael. But the free condoms weren't just Tufts' way of encouraging a little Valentine's Day action - if you listened long enough, the people manning the table would have gladly explained why they were giving away contraceptives. And they would have offered to sell you a daisy. VISIONS is a worldwide organization that works to help AIDS patients. The Tufts chapter tabled yesterday during lunch and dinner, selling daisies for a dollar and handing out condoms and information on STDs. The proceeds from the daisy sales will be donated to Community Servings, a Boston organization that cooks 650 meals a day for AIDS patients and their families. According to the VISIONS president, sophomore Alison Clarke, Community Servings buys 90 percent of its food, the rest coming from donations. To help the organization purchase its food, VISIONS decided to conduct the fundraiser in Community Servings' honor. Every Wednesday, VISIONS members trek to the Community Servings' soup kitchen to lend a hand in preparing food. They also volunteer their time to events such as the annual AIDS walk. The students recently helped make phone calls to those who have previously participated in the AIDS, encouraging them to walk again. For sophomore Abi Mancell, VISIONS' treasurer, helping others provides is the only reward she needs for her work. "It's very fulfilling," she said. "I know that they appreciate everything we do." By the end of the lunch tabling shift in Dewick, the group had collected about $100. Clarke felt their efforts were paying off, and that the dinner shifts would boost sales. As she spoke, students walked up to the table to grab a few condoms and a piece of candy. "Buy a daisy for a dollar!" Her voice followed them, sometimes luring the students back to the table, sometimes not. "We probably won't sell all the daisies," she said. But, she added, the group was working not only for the profit of Community Servings, but also for the education and prevention of disease. Clarke became involved with VISIONS because of its safe sex message on campus, but also because of its work outside of Tufts. "I think it's a really great organization. I like the community service aspect. We get to go off campus and do things in the community," she said. "I like how it's connected to VISIONS worldwide." As a whole, Clarke was encouraged by students' responses to the condom giveaway. "I heard a couple of reactions that Valentine's Day is about love not sex, but those were really the only negative things," she said. "We weren't promoting sex on Valentine's Day, we were just promoting safe sex in general." Many students didn't seem to have a problem grabbing a few condoms, Clarke said. To her, that's a good sign."It was a good thing that people aren't embarrassed about taking [condoms]. It's really good that it's not a stigma," she said, adding that VISIONS also offered female condoms, which "sparked a lot of interest because most people haven't seen them."


The Setonian
News

Housing shortage draws students to special interest units

While many students spent last Thursday anxiously waiting to learn their housing lottery numbers, some had already begun to seek other campus housing options such as apartments, culture houses, and Metcalf Hall's Bridge program. These units, which are less dependent on the lottery system, have experienced a larger pool of applicants this year because of the housing crunch both on and off campus.Prospective culture house residents must submit applications - often before the lottery numbers are released - and undergo an interview process to be accepted for housing within the unit. While some houses experience a consistently small pool of applicants because they target a limited section of the Tufts community, demand for space at houses like the Jewish Culture House (Bayit), the Capen house, and the Arts Haus has grown over the past few years.Capen House manager Alma Mends says her house, which provides living arrangements for African-American students, has attracted a wide array of applicants this year because of specific efforts by house members to reach out to the community. "We tried to let people know that we were here and that they have somewhere to come," Mends said.While these efforts contributed to the increase in applicants, advisors believe the housing crunch is the biggest reason for the larger pool. A significant amount of sophomores, for example, apply to special interest houses with the simple intention of securing a place to live for their junior year. "[Applicants are] interested in doing something related to African descent, but also, with the housing crunch on campus, they're interested in having a room," Capen House advisor Lisa Coleman said.Latino Culture Unit advisor Ruben Salinas-Stern said that the housing shortage places a great pressure on students. "There's a great deal of stress on the part of students who don't know where they're going to live next year and it impacts them academically and socially," he said. Living in the Latino Culture house is a rewarding experience, said Salinas-Stern, "except when we have to deal with, 'do we give this person housing, or does the person live without any housing at all?'"Houses like the Bayit have dealt with the influx of applicants by moving their deadlines forward this year to assure that prospective residents are indeed interested in the house and not simply applying because of their low lottery number.Each of Tufts' 14 culture houses, which range in size from eight to 18 residents, is run by a faculty advisor and student managers. Each house caters to a particular community on campus, be it an ethnic, language, religious, or special interest group. Most are located in small, free-standing houses, but others, like the Rainbow House and Japanese Culture Unit, are contained within on-campus apartments.The culture houses are a hub of cultural activity and provide programming for residents as well as the greater Tufts community."It's a unique place to live that offers experiences you probably couldn't get in any other situation," said senior Josh Weingram, who is a three-year Bayit resident. "It's the only place where you can be exposed to a certain culture in a lot of different aspects from different people all at once."The Arts Haus attributes its popularity to its unique decor. "It's a really different atmosphere to live in," said junior Iris Halpern, a second-year resident. "It's really friendly, a lot more like a home, so a lot of people are attracted to that. There's a lot of activity going on in the house; it also offers alternative things to do on Friday night."Other students, like freshman Ken Hamill, who will co-manage the Rainbow House next year, feel that the culture houses provide a more comfortable environment than traditional dorms. "People are really interested in sharing commonalities," Hamill said. "That makes for a much more enjoyable living experience, when you know something already about all the other people and connect with them." Both these and the Bridge Program focus on specific student interests, while the on-campus apartments allow students to experience more real-life housing situations. Formerly known as "co-ops," the units include kitchenettes and personal bathrooms that are maintained by the residents."It's just as if you lived off-campus, except that you live in University housing," Residential Life Coordinator Dean Gendron said.An estimated 400 separate groups of students applied to live in one of Tufts' 61 on-campus apartments this year, making this option the most popular alternative housing choice. While apartment distribution depends on lottery numbers, students must submit applications for apartments days before the numbers are posted.Unlike on-campus apartments, Metcalf's Bridge program experienced less demand this year for the 40 rooms available to upperclassmen. The Bridge program, first introduced in 1993, provides a residential forum for students interested in enhanced discussion and increased faculty interaction. In previous years, the Bridge program weekly meetings were required, but this year, participation is no longer mandatory."We actually find that having the program move around and encouraging students to come without mandating attendance means that participation is as good if not better than it has ever been," Gendron said.Sophomore Sarah Lawrence received a low lottery number, approached Residential Life for advice, and is now considering Metcalf as an option. "When housing couldn't give me an assurance that I would get on-campus housing, I was told to fill out a Metcalf application. For a lot of people that's not an ideal situation," Lawrence said. "My options are limited; I wouldn't even say they're options really; they're a forced alternative."The program also eliminated the essay it previously included on the Bridge program's application, and prospective residents now need only complete a Bridge preference form to make them eligible for Metcalf's own lottery.Students cite Metcalf's large rooms, central location, the Bridge program, and the range of class years of residents as the reasons they chose the dorm.Metcalf resident Phil Erner says that students enjoy the community aspect of the small dorm. "From what I hear from everyone else, somebody living in Carmichael doesn't get to know half or a third of their dorm, like I have," he said. "I've definitely felt a strong sense of community between a large percentage of the residents here."


The Setonian
News

Save the new constitution, kill the culture representative amendment

We might as well call Wednesday, April 25 "Tufts Election Day," as it appears to be the final chance for every undergraduate student on campus to make a decision about our future. Our TCU Senate race was uncontested, which I sincerely hope means that students are happy with the way things are going. I have tremendous faith in our future Senate, and I truly hope that the successes of this year will continue into the next. But don't look to the Senate alone to solve all of our problems on campus; you have to look to yourself and the communities to which you belong.I have seen the strength that we as students and members of our cultural communities have to offer Tufts. Judging by the myriad of cultural clubs and communities, I wager that most of us cannot keep track of the multitude of cultural events that happen throughout the year. These communities must continue to exist and serve the important purpose of welcoming students to a community they can call home. However, the role that these communities play in terms of working with the TCU Senate must be more clearly defined.Under our current system, culture representatives are present to act as liaisons between the Senate and the culture group, but not to assume any fiscal or executive board responsibilities. It would be very fair to equate culture representatives with political watchdogs and lobbyists, as they attend all Senate meetings and play an active roll in promoting their cultures' agendas. Historically, they also offset a predominantly white, male TCU Senate, and act as a constant reminder to address culture groups' needs.Currently, we have four culture representatives on the TCU Senate, from the Association of Latino American Students (ALAS), the Pan-African Alliance (PAA), Tufts Transgendered, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual Collective (TTLGBC), and the Asian Community at Tufts (ACT). Thirty years ago, these broad terms for organizations made sense and were more appropriate designations for the Tufts community (albeit groups such as TTLGBC have not been here for 30 years), but Tufts has changed dramatically. Student diversity has changed, but the Senate continues to function as though these are the only culture interests present on the Tufts campus. Where is our Arab Students Association culture representative? Where are our religious culture representatives? Where is our Tufts Association of South Asians culture representative? The Tufts application separates East Asian from South Asian, so why is TASA lumped under ACT, which clearly represents East Asian interests?It should not be up to the Senate to decide which cultural groups warrant precious time at a Senate meeting; it should be up to the culture groups themselves. This is a dual responsibility: Culture groups should talk to their senators, talk to their Cultural Coordinating Committee and Committee on Ethnicity and Cultural Affairs members, and lobby their interests at Senate meetings. Senators should keep their eyes and ears open to issues and concerns of culture groups and then act upon them in Senate. We join our culture groups to have a home and a voice on campus. We join the Senate because we want to make the hard decisions on how we spend our student activities fee, as well as how to get what we want from the administration. If you feel that the needs of your culture group are constantly ignored, please petition the TCU Senate for the right to establish a culture representative position for your organization. Then the argument arises that culture representatives do all the work of a senator, without recognition or the ability to vote. Instead of granting them equal power, I ask, "why do they go above and beyond their duties as culture representatives?" They know that they are going beyond the call of duty, but does that mean we should reward them with power? It is the same sort of argument as that which demands compensation for volunteer work. The definition of volunteer work is giving up your time to work on a project without monetary compensation; if a job is compensated with money, it is no longer volunteer work. If we call the power to vote on ALBO recommendations "money," then culture representatives are doing "volunteer" work in the Senate. With this definition, senators are performing paid labor. With the way the pre-amendment constitution reads, each culture representative has basically the same amount of power as your average student, but has chosen his/her time to volunteer for the Senate. The new constitution recognizes this flaw and would give our culture representatives procedural votes (i.e. the ability to make motions, call for recess, etc.). Culture representatives deserve some form of "employee benefits" that recognize the work they perform. However, with the passage of the amendment to grant culture representatives full voting rights, we are giving "monetary compensation" for "volunteer work."If the actual constitution passes, many of its current flaws will be rectified and appease the complaints of senators and culture representatives alike. But if the constitutional amendment passes, the fundamental structure of the Senate will change. Culture representative will represent the issues of their culture and not the issues of the general student body. We should not have special interest groups control our money, especially if the people in power were able to bypass a campus-wide vote for office. There are TCU Senate election rules governing minimum required campus participation for any election or constitutional amendment.In conclusion, please vote yes on the new constitution to give culture representatives the right they deserve. And vote no on the amendment to give full voting rights to culture representatives, as TCU budgetary matters are not part of their job. Please exercise your vote on this important decision.Scott Pherson is a junior majoring in biology and environmental science. He is a former TCU senator.



The Setonian
News

Nutrient needs for active people

Whether you're a team Jumbo or just one who likes to hit the treadmill every now and again, the athletes among us have special nutrition needs. Performance during exercise is closely tied to diet - the more nutritious your diet, the better your performance will be. Good nutrition will enhance your endurance and aid in muscle repair. However, there is a lot of misinformation out there - especially on the Internet - about nutrition and exercise. Some of the myths you may have heard recently on diet and exercise deserve to be debunked. There are a number of different energy sources your muscles use to move. First, there is ATP, the body's main energy source, which is the form of energy in cells that is the most readily available for your body - it's use first during exercise. However, there is only a small amount of stored ATP, so more of it needs to be made while you are moving. Dietary carbohydrates, fats, proteins, and a high-energy compound in the cells, phosphocreatine, all contribute to the production of ATP. The amount that each form of fuel contributes is highly dependent on the intensity of the activity. Therefore, the diet needs of each individual depend on how fit a person is, and how intense their activity is.Protein Without the recommended daily allowance (RDA) of protein (0.36 grams/lb.), a person will feel tired, and will be less able to recover from injury or illness. This means that an active person who is not eating an adequate amount of protein for their body size will have trouble performing efficiently in their activities. Only about two to five percent of the body's general fuel needs comes from protein, which is very small compared to how much carbohydrate and fat the body burns. However, in endurance exercise, protein may contribute up to ten percent of calories burned. Protein needs increase for intense exercisers, along with their calorie needs. Therefore, experts recommend athletes eat 0.55 to 0.73 grams of protein per pound. But, contrary to popular belief, excessive protein in the diet is not necessary for most athletes. Your body can only metabolize so much protein per day, so even if you ate more than twice the RDA for protein in hopes of building extra muscle or sprinting faster, it would only amount to extra calories - your body would excrete the extra protein. A similar myth among athletes is that body-builders, in particular, need more protein in their diet. However, the opposite is true. Less protein is used during strength training/weight lifting, whereas greater amounts are used during endurance training (e.g., running). The main types of fuel used during weight lifting are phosphocreatine and carbohydrate. In fact, experts claim that a meal or supplement that is high in carbohydrate and moderate in protein can boost the muscle-building effect after strength training. Fat Fat is a great source of energy - one gram of fat provides twice the amount of energy than one gram of carbohydrate. However, fat is used as the main fuel source only during long bouts of exercise that are of low or moderate intensity. The more fit you are, the more fat is used by your body as fuel, because, when a muscle is well trained, it uses fat more efficiently as a source of energy. Researchers have found that the more fatty acids that are released from the muscle, the more fat your body will use as energy during physical activity. Athletes have found that they can increase the amount of fatty acids that are released from the muscle, thus increasing the amount of fat that is burned during exercise, by drinking caffeinated beverages.Carbohydrate Anyone who is physically active needs a diet that is moderate to high in carbohydrates (two to three grams per pound of body weight) - even if your goal is to lose weight. For those who are into endurance training, up to 3.6 to 4.5 grams per pound is appropriate. If you exercise regularly, your dinner plate should contain about two-thirds grains and veggies, and one-third meat or other protein source. Antioxidants Antioxidants help protect your body from oxidative stresses that occur naturally (exercise, for example). Antioxidants like vitamins C and E are important for general health, but are particularly important for people who like to exercise, because of the physical stress put on the body. These stresses contribute to the muscle stiffness and soreness you feel after a hard workout. Furthermore, antioxidants are key in fighting infections and maintaining a healthy immune system - if your body has a suppressed immune system, it will not be able to "play" as hard as you would like it to. So make sure to stock up on those oranges and strawberries for vitamin C, and almonds and wheat germ for vitamin E. For anyone who finds it difficult to get enough vitamin E from food alone, supplements are an option - just make sure to not go above 400 International Units (IU) per day with food and supplements combined. Calcium Low calcium intake increases one's risk for stress fractures and other bone injuries. Regular exercisers should be sure to get the RDA for calcium, 1000 to 1300 mg, to protect their bones. Your most nutritious, calcium-packed foods are low-fat dairy products, broccoli, tofu, and fortified orange juice.Iron Iron is an important mineral for blood health. Without adequate iron stores, muscles will not get enough oxygen to work properly. Low iron levels and anemia (a condition caused by iron deficiency) lead to fatigue and impaired performance in sports. Women are especially at risk for low iron levels and anemia due to menstrual blood losses. The RDA for iron in women is 15 milligrams; for men it is 12 milligrams. Meat is the best source of iron, because our bodies can absorb the iron in meat better than, say, the iron in spinach. However, beans, broccoli, and fortified cereals are good sources of iron as well. Something else to keep in mind when you go for that juicy steak to boost your iron intake: eat an orange at the same time - vitamin C helps iron get absorbed into the bloodstream. Water Your body sweats to keep cool during exercise, but losing too much water is dangerous; it causes stress on the heart. Any level of dehydration during exercise can severely hinder a person's performance. It is imperative to replenish fluids often during physical activity, especially long periods of exercise.


The Setonian
News

Liberal magazine takes left-center stage

It seems a new cause for some of Tufts' most active liberal students is, well, writing about liberal causes. Editors say they created Radix, a political, arts and entertainment magazine, to report on campus, national, and international issues from a liberal perspective. In its first semester, editors say they will publish two issues. While still awaiting official group status and a set budget from the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate, staff members have already begun work on their inaugural issue. The staff hopes the magazine's budget will be large enough to allow them to publish monthly. But that may not be possible, since the Senate's budgeting for next year is almost complete. If no exception or extension is made for the magazine, Radix will be bound by the Senate's standard $1,000 new group cap. "In my experience caps aren't overturned many times, because a lot of [Allocations Board] members feel a cap is there for a reason," TCU Senate Treasurer Michele Shelton said. "It's difficult to have the cap overturned, but not impossible." The journal will be composed of columns, an arts section, and a feature spread covering current events that are relevant to Tufts students. The first issue will include a cover story on the topic of globalization, a review of President Bush's first 100 days in office, and an interview with an undisclosed celebrity. The political articles, poetry, art, book reviews, paintings, and editorials will all have a touch of the magazine's liberal slant.Radix founders are affiliated with a number of campus organizations, including activist and culture groups and various other publications. "This is a magazine of opinions and major topics of importance on the campus and in international politics," said sophomore Lou Esparza, the features editor, who also writes for the Observer.Radix editors say their magazine is unique in both content and organization. There is no editor-in-chief and decisions are made by group consensus, without any voting process. The goal: to promote egalitarianism and inclusiveness, and avoid hierarchy. "It's kind of socialistic," said sophomore Jesse Alderman, the political editor and a member of the Coalition for Social Justice and Nonviolence. The staff says it wants to produce a more diverse body of articles and features. While The Radix will be geared primarily toward undergraduates, submissions from graduate students and faculty are welcome. "Anyone can get involved and does not need to have certain political beliefs," Esparza said.Radix founders say that Tufts has an untapped demand for a liberal magazine and that it will not compete with The Primary Source, the University's right-wing political journal. And because it differs ideologically, editors are confident The Radix will publish different fare than that offered in The Primary Source. "The two are incomparable," Esparza said. Editors on The Primary Source, which has published biweekly issues since 1982, say they are looking forward to some competition in the political arena, and hope that The Radix will raise issues that both publications can discuss. But Primary Source Editor-in-Chief Josh Martino seems skeptical as to whether TheRadix will last longer than other liberal journals, such as Submerge. "That's their challenge," he said.


The Setonian
News

It's the electricity, stupid

Mass. Electric's July set of power outages caused more loss and aggravation to Tufts and the surrounding community then any other in recent memory. It is still unclear as to why both the main and backup power supply lines into the Medford area failed and caused a week of intermittent power outages lasting up to twenty hours at a time. But the impact on residents, businesses, and the University was apparent. Food was thrown out, stores were closed, and people melted without any fans or air conditioning to relieve the 90-degree heat. Most people in Medford were able to file claims with Mass. Electric to cover expenses due to lost groceries or products. But the company claims that it would not be possible for Tufts to be compensated for its own losses, such as frozen samples in biology labs, dining services supplies, or rented generators. Though it is difficult to put a price tag on the cost to Tufts, a reasonable estimate would surely be in the tens of thousands. Given the state of Tufts' endowment, the University should pursue any reasonable legal means to recover such a large economic loss. This is far from the first time power has been lost at Tufts; in fact, outages usually occur several times a year on campus. Some blame the deregulation of the power services industry in Massachusetts for causing companies such as Mass. Electric to sacrifice quality service for bottom line profits. While this may or may not be true, it certainly can't hurt for students to get involved in local politics and speak out about issue such as this.The state rightly launched its own investigation into the incident through the attorney general and Department of Telecommunications and Energy offices to prevent a similar occurrence in the future. Mass. Electric has also hired its own private consultant to examine the matter. The company also promised to run a new second backup line directly to Tufts. But both Tufts administrators and students need to see this incident as a catalyst for real change. If not, you may be studying at the local Starbucks sometime this semester after the library lights go out.


The Setonian
News

Tufts ranks second in Peace Corps recruits

President John F. Kennedy in 1961 called upon Americans to "ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country," and established the Peace Corps. This year, 22 Tufts students are answering his call and serving overseas in the government organization, which places Tufts second among universities with less than 5,000 undergraduates in the number of alumni to enroll in the Peace Corps. This marks the second year that Tufts has ranked among the top suppliers of Peace Corps volunteers. Thanks in part to Tufts graduates, the Peace Corps recently reached its highest enrollment in more than 26 years, with over 7,300 volunteers and trainees worldwide. "With a strong international focus and a proven dedication to volunteerism and service, Tufts students and alumni continue to play an important role in the Peace Corps," President John DiBiaggio said in a press release. "I am proud that Tufts remains a leader and is preparing its students for active service in the global community." The goal of the Corps is to improve educational opportunities for children by working with teachers and parents. Volunteers work with communities to protect the local environment and create economic opportunities, work on projects to keep families healthy, help farmers increase their yield, and curtail the spread of AIDS. The overall purpose, however, is to empower people to take control of their future. While there is no single reason for Tufts' high numbers, Assistant Director of Recruiting for Career Services Marie McCool said that the campus atmosphere contributes heavily to Tufts' success. "Overall, it's the social consciousness of the University," she said. "It's not necessarily anything we do. We provide the forum, but the mentality is already there." Tufts had more participants than many other Boston-area schools, including nearby institutions such as Harvard and Brown, which did not make the list. The top school in the under-5,000 undergraduates category was Middlebury College, which had 32 graduates enrolled in the program though it has half as many undergraduate students as Tufts. The University of Wisconsin-Madison took top honors overall for the third year in a row, with 93 graduates currently serving. Though Career Services does not directly recruit students for the organization, Tufts assists representatives of the Peace Corps in tabling, and conducting information sessions and on-campus interviews. "We help students figure out their strengths and their passions, and figure out what they might do in the future," Director of Career Services Jean Papalia said. "The Peace Corps appeals to a lot of Tufts students." "The strong showing of colleges from so many different parts of the country illustrates that many students today are solidly dedicated to service and deeply value the unique experience Peace Corps offers," Peace Corps Acting Director Charles Baquet, III said in a press release. Life as a volunteer in the Corps is not easy, according the Corps' website. Volunteers are expected to serve in their host countries for two years, and are afforded no special privileges. Often, they are stationed in remote communities. Intensive language and cultural training allow them to become an integral part of the communities where they live, and they must speak the local language and adapt to the cultures and customs of the people with whom they work. The Corps has sent over 161,000 trained volunteers to 134 countries since 1961. During its 40th anniversary year, the Peace Corps hopes to boost the number of volunteers by 25 percent.


The Setonian
News

Students guzzle energy drink

Coffee, tea, and soda may not be cutting it on college campuses anymore. There is a new wave of energy drinks on the shelves at health clubs and grocery stores throughout the country - including Jumbo Express. Red Bull tops the charts at the campus convenience store, beating out Coca-Cola's new caffeine drink, KMX, and Sobe's energy drink, in popularity. Jumbo Express began stocking Red Bull last year when it arrived in the northeast market - and it's been a hit ever since. "[Red Bull] is by far the most popular," said Keith Mayes, Unit Manager of the campus center. Freshman Matthew Hallisey is one of the many students who drinks Red Bull. He says he drinks it because he enjoys energy drinks and it helps him stay up to study. "I guess in general I am a sucker for energy drinks. I drink it when I am tired from sports and need to study," he said. Hallisey also said that he thinks Red Bull's explosive popularity is in part due to a new trend towards fitness. "In think in general people go for gimmicks, and now people are into fitness," he said. Sophomore Elizabeth Strukelj thinks that Red Bull is popular because it offers something new. "People like it as an energy drink. [Red Bull] is a cool new alternative," she said. However, there is considerable mystery surrounding Red Bull, leaving many to wonder what's actually in it. "That is the whole thing surrounding Red Bull," Strukelj said. "No one really knows what it is." This uncertainty, combined with the drink's unconventional taste, adds to its popularity. Red Bull has been compared to everything from carbonated cough syrup to bubble gum. "I think it tastes pretty good; kind of unique," sophomore David Sturrus said. Red Bull certainly offers a different kind of caffeinated beverage than the usual cup of flavored coffee from the Rez or a cup of cappuccino from Brown and Brew. So where did Red Bull come from? According to a New York Times article on Nov. 12, 2000, it originated in Thailand and was later brought to Europe in 1986 by Austrian entrepreneur Diedtrich Matesich. Matesich bought the non-Asian rights to the drink and - after slightly changing recipe - he began to market Red Bull in other European countries in 1993. The drink became very popular among young people and bars began serving Red Bull and vodka. Red Bull made its debut in the United States in 1997 with the first North American Red Bull subsidiary in Santa Monica, CA. It became so popular in New York City bars that the company decided to move up the first distribution date in New York by eight months so that owners would not have to continue to buy from foreign distributors. So what, exactly, is Red Bull? There are many rumors floating around about the ingredients of the drink - especially one called taurine. "I have heard some things about taurine, that it is the same stuff they use in diet pills as caffeine substitutes," Hallisey said. Another rumor define taurine as a hormone found in bulls, but that is not entirely accurate. According to the Times article, the substance is an amino acid that is, in fact, found in bulls, but also in humans and many other animals. Other main ingredients in the drink include water, sugar, caffeine, vitamin B12, niacin, inositol (a vitamin found in fruits and nuts), and glucuronolactone (a metabolite formed from glucose). Another popular belief is that Red Bull has more caffeine than a cup of coffee, allowing you to stay up later studying or partying. In fact, the standard 8.3-ounce can of Red Bull contains the same amount of caffeine as an average cup of coffee. On campus, students seem to be well informed of this, and are not fooled by all the talk. "I think [the amount of caffeine] is about as much as a cup of coffee," Sturrus said. As of yet there is no evidence that Red Bull causes any health problems, but the company itself warns that it is not suitable for young children and those sensitive to caffeine. Students who drink it have not heard of any health risks associated with Red Bull, either, and hope it will stay that way. "I don't think there are any risks. I hope not," Sturrus said. Strukelj assumes the risks are similar to those of caffeine in general. "[Drinking Red Bull] probably has the same effect as drinking a lot of coffee, although the company does say it is not recommended for children," she said. With so many students drinking Red Bull, it seems like this energy drink will be around for a while - at least until the end of this semester. "It is extremely popular among the young crowd," Mayes said. "[Red Bull's popularity] started in bars and is now sweeping college campuses."


The Setonian
News

Build it and they will come

With real estate running out, Tufts will soon move from its building spree to a self-improvement stage. When this time comes, the University should consider using its deferred maintenance monies and other available funds for more than just plugging holes. The past ten years have seen this campus grow into a dynamic academic environment replete with quality students, improved facilities, and expanded program offerings. But with little physical land on which to build, Tufts must better utilize its existing facilities. That Tufts will eventually run out of expansion room is inevitable. The University has an obligation to protect what little green space remains to maintain the suburban feel that is a major draw for prospective students. The surrounding communities, furthermore, are by no means spirited supporters of the Brown and Blue, and are unlikely to let the University creep much further into their territory _ they are pesky enough already. Within these spatial limitations, however, the avenues of improvement are plentiful. A new dorm, for example, will alleviate some of the housing crunch, but not address the changing desires of students in terms of their residential experience. Currently, there are few apartment style buildings on campus, with a meager spattering of four person suites in Lewis and Latin Way, and a larger offering of six person co-ops in Hillsides. Res. Life has done its best to make the dorms attractive places to inhabit, but with limited budgets for renovations, it will be unlikely to make significant improvements. But when renovating the older dorms, especially those that already lend themselves to apartment style living - Wren and Haskell, prime among them - the University should seek to make them more desirable for their residents. This could easily be done with the addition of kitchens in areas that now serve as common rooms and by installing locking doors between the suites. It's a relatively easy task, considering that these buildings need work anyway, but the additions would make an appreciable quality of life difference. Tufts also owns space at the end of Boston Avenue _ the buildings near the Science Technology Center _ which could easily be made into an apartment complex for upperclassmen. The building is currently leased to local companies, but Tufts could transform it into a living facility when the leases run out. The commute would be a hike, but it has several advantages: It's close to engineering and science labs and the facility would not require a dining hall, as each apartment would be equipped with a kitchen. If constructed with two or three person suites, many juniors and seniors might flock to the building - despite its location - because of the real world appeal. As resident halls are improved, Tufts can turn its attention to the other services that campus housing makes readily available. Dining options, for example, could also benefit from renovated space. Additions to Hotung, the Commons, and Trios have been helpful, but nothing compared to the well-known names that could be brought to a food court. Such a place would alleviate the incredible wait in the Commons during peak hours and add badly needed food options. NYU has a food court that would fit ideally into the Tufts campus. Its facility accommodates about 250 people at a time, and has more than five vendors in a relatively small space: Pizza Hut, Burger King, a salad bar, a deli and a pasta station. Would Paige Hall, which should be vacated with the opening of the psychology building, not be the perfect space? There is currently no dining facility in that area of campus and a food court this size could certainly fit into Paige. While making food options more numerous and housing more sprightly, Tufts might also consider improving its social spaces _ the last of the major services areas that requires attention. True, the campus center already has two ATMs, a ping-pong table and a pool table, but the space could be made into a real center of campus _ a place where people actually want to hang out after their lunch or dinner. If Hotung, for example, added more televisions _ how a sports pub only has one TV is beyond comprehension _ and maybe a couple of stools for the bar-type tables, more students might actually spend time there. The selection of alcohol should be expanded, as well, as a "pub" typically offers more than a few beers. And some of the silly decorations _ field hockey and lacrosse sticks _ should be replaced with a score ticker or sports pub paraphernalia. The campus center lounges themselves could have a bit more appeal, with extra pool tables, better decor, and even a bit of music. Because of its not very attractive appearance, few people use the campus center as a base of social interaction. Deferred maintenance and other funds would be well spent in this area. With building space running out, there are many improvements that warrant attention and funds. Over the past ten years Tufts has done an incredible job turning this campus from a sleepy New England school into one of the premier learning environments on the East coast. If funds are used wisely, students will reap the full benefits of this remarkable transformation.


The Setonian
News

Suspense novel lacks key element of suspense

One of the greatest pitfalls of modern American literature is the curious occurrence of the cookie-cutter novel. A cookie-cutter looks like a novel, has a snippet of a positive review from a major newspaper on the cover, and includes an intriguing synopsis on the back cover that tells you nothing about the plot of the book. Paul Griner's Collectors, newly released in paperback from Picador USA, is one such novel. Collectors tells the story of Jean Duprez, billed on the cover as "strong, self-confident, but with a dark past." She meets an intriguing and handsome man named Steven Cain (now there's an idea _ give the villain a name allegorical to one of the darkest figures in Judeo-Christian lore), and things "spiral out of control." Unfortunately, while reading the novel, the only thing spiraling outwards for this reviewer was her attention. Jean Duprez turns out to be a common staple of the cookie-cutter novel _ the woman who is strong, self-possessed, and independent. She immediately comes off to the reader as unlikable, stubborn, and aloof, although her way of turning down men hitting on her at the beach (by strewing broken champagne flutes on the ground before their bare feet) was one of the few amusing points in the novel. In fact, the reader feels more sympathy towards the mysterious and charming Steven Cain as the novel progresses, painting him as the equally cookie-cutter "likable boy who gets a screw loose and turns scary" featured in innumerable suspense novels. As the novel continues on from the opening chapter, the reader comes to find that the plot is as simplistic and patterned as the meager offerings of characters. Jean's "dark past" turns out to be a stalking incident, revealed to the reader just before the reader finds out that Steven is stalking her now. She becomes trapped on a sailboat just outside of Marblehead, MA with Steven, and a series of incidents far too reminiscent of Stephen King's Misery play out. Steven gets crazier, Jean tries to fight back or escape using a variety of easily thought-of and predictable methods, and it all ends in the "final, shocking conclusion" that the reader sees coming about halfway through the novel. The one saving grace of Collectors is the fast-paced, Hemmingway-esque prose of Griner, coupled with a series of very simple yet vivid descriptions. His light, terse style makes reading the novel an incredibly easy and quick task. The ability to almost see some of his scenes taking place is perhaps the only thing that kept this reviewer from throwing the novel into the waste basket. It would seem that Griner, unlike many modern novelists, is actually a good writer _ he just has no imagination and saw a certain Kathy Bates film one time too many times.Collectors is a good example of the mediocrity that floods bookstores these days. Its cookie-cutter plot might have been suspenseful in the 1960s when it was new, and its cookie-cutter characters are almost laughable. It may be worth the read, however, for anyone who enjoys a good writer's take on a bad story.


The Setonian
News

From Atlantic to Pacific... and beyond

Last Monday, thousands of Jumbos found themselves struggling to remember their class schedules and to catch up on neglected work as classes restarted after the spring break. They have returned to campus from all over the globe, with their vacation destinations ranging from Paris, France, to Orange County, California and everywhere in between. The trips covered the gamut from the mundane to the exotic, so do the spring break plans really measure up? Junior Anoop Swaminath was quite the traveler last week, journeying to Paris and London for his vacation. Swaminath chose to forgo the more typical choice of a tropical destination because he wanted the opportunity to visit friends who are studying abroad in the two cities. A first-time visitor to London, Swaminath found the city extremely entertaining and interesting for a college-aged visitor. "There's a lot of stuff to do there... whatever age you are. You can go to museums, sports events, pubs," he said. "Whatever you want, it's there." Though he easily found things he did want to see, Swaminath encountered two items that he could have done without. Upon returning to Medford, he reported that the London weather is no better than Boston weather. And Swaminath encountered some pretty high prices, though he said that students could easily see Europe for less money than he did (by spending nights with friends instead of in hotels, for example). Despite the trip's hefty price tag, Swaminath said the opportunity to see his friends and to explore two of the most magnificent cities in Europe was worthwhile. If you're looking for a spring break with a little less "sleaze," as Swaminath put it, a visit to friends on study-abroad programs might be the ticket. But maybe you're one of those who want the sleaze. For that experience, freshman Sherry Zakhary recommends you try Cancun, as she and her friends did last week. "It's the craziest place in the world!" Zakhary said. Zakhary and her friends chose Cancun for the same reason thousands of college students do every year. "We had heard that it was the center of all Spring Breaks so we decided to go to what we heard was the best place," she explained. Zakhary spent her Spring Break relaxing and letting loose in Mexico. She recalls that she and her friends spent a lot of time sleeping and tanning on the beach, yet still found time to go clubbing practically every night. But luxurious spring breaks like Cancun are expensive. Zakhary's spring break package was originally listed at $699, but the company she used found countless additional expenses and taxes to add on. As soon as Zakhary and her friends arrived in Cancun, for example, they were pressured to sign on for a club package that limited the places they would go to each night but provided them with no cover charge and free drinks. These add-ons, compounded with spending money for personal expenses, boosted the price of Zakhary's spring break up to approximately $1,400. So was it worth it? According to Zakhary, the answer is a loud affirmative. "It's an experience that you definitely cannot describe - you have to experience it. It was a great bonding experience that we will never forget. It's a freshman-year thing, too," Zakhary said. For some students who sought tropical climates, Cancun seemed a bit too hectic. The seniors living in the Bayit, Tufts' Jewish culture house, opted to take a Royal Caribbean cruise for their last spring break before graduation. Seth Haaz, one of the seniors, noted that the low-key atmosphere of a cruise made the final spring break of his Tufts career a memorable one. "It's not quite the craziness of a normal spring break... If you're looking for 24/7 craziness, that's not a cruise. A cruise is more relaxing," Haaz said. Haaz, the president of Hillel, and his friends unfortunately encountered some rainy weather in the Bahamas but overall made the most of their time in the Caribbean. One particularly enjoyable day consisted of snorkeling and jet skiing off the coast of the cruise line's private island. While the weather put a damper on some cruise activities, Haaz said the trip was worth the $720 per person (including air fare and ground transportation to the departure point in Florida). "It was really great to take time away from the hectic life at Tufts and to spend a week with my close friends before we graduate," Haaz said. Some students chose the less exotic as their Spring Break locale. Freshman Elizabeth Candee found her vacation paradise in her hometown of Chappaqua in New York's Westchester County. She decided to go home to see friends from high school that had the same week off, and because she hadn't seen her parents or house in two months. While going home sounds like an opportunity to unwind and get lots of sleep, Candee found that the reverse was true: "It was fun but it wasn't relaxing. I still did a lot even though I was home. There was only one morning I didn't set my alarm because I had so much to do," Candee said. And while some claim that spring break is better spent in the Caribbean, Candee is glad she went home. "I had a really great spring break. It was really nice to go home. I'll go away another time. I have three more years to go away," she said. Best of all, her version of Spring Break didn't cost an arm and a leg. Candee's roundtrip plane ticket was $120 with a student coupon and she spent the same or less money entertaining herself at home. "It was a 'low-cost' spring break," she quipped. Unlike Candee, sophomore Kay Odashima was unable to go to her home. That's because her family lives in France, an undeniably harder destination to reach. The complications of an international flight and the fact that Odashima couldn't spend the money to go away on a trip caused Odashima to spend her spring break right here on campus. Though she was expecting a long, boring, week with plenty of time for work, Odashima discovered that Spring Break on campus can actually be a lot of fun. A class-free week provided Odashima with the opportunity to explore Boston with her international friends, who were also not able to go home. Odashima and a friend even spent a night in Cape Cod. The closing of some student services provided a bit of a challenge for those who spent Spring Break at their home away from home. Odashima found herself spending about ten times more money than she spends in a usual week. She attributes the spending to the fact that she had to constantly eat in restaurants and that she felt inclined to splurge in her shopping because it was, after all, vacation. In the end, Odashima had a surprisingly enjoyable and social spring break that she would recommend to students in similar circumstances. "If you're tight on money and need to save then it's not that bad," she said. "Even if you did have a lot of work to do you probably wouldn't get it done." For some Tufts athletes, personal finances played no role in their Spring Break plans. Freshman Deana Davidian, a member of the Tufts softball team, spent her spring break in Orange County, California. Though her daily schedule was demanding - typically two softball games each day and a curfew of 11 p.m. - she said she had a wonderful time with the team. "I felt like it was a great experience because I really got to bond with my teammates and have a lot of fun playing softball," she said. Not only was it fun, it was luxurious. Davidian's accommodations, which she shared with five other girls, included two bedrooms, a living room, two baths, a full kitchen, and a fireplace. Her room and all of her meals were paid for by the team. The money was raised through extensive fundraising, which included running softball clinics, selling pretzels at football games, and selling t-shirts. So what was left for Davidian to pay for? Basically, nothing. Her spring break was by far the most economical, as she spent a total of $10 of her personal funds. Maybe more than any of her peers, Davidian got her money's worth.


The Setonian
News

Seussical's' long journey to Broadway

Oh, the places Seussical has gone since it made its premiere in August at the Colonial Theater. I question whether the musical I saw in Boston has any similarities to the current production in New York, which has undergone quite an extensive facelift. When the musical, written and conceived by Lynn Ahrens and Stephen Flaherty (the creative team behind Once on this Island and Ragtime) debuted in Boston, it seemed to be right on its way to becoming the next Lion King, a creative, fun show that adults and children could both enjoy. Audrey Geisel, the widow of Theodore Geisel, the infamous and beloved Dr. Seuss, had given the show her blessing. The buzz after workshops in Toronto had been hopeful and exciting. But boy, did it fall flat on its face in Boston. It wasn't exactly the critical success everyone behind the show had hoped it would be. Everyone seemed to agree that even though it had potential, it desperately needed some work. Major critics like Boston Globe reviewer Ed Siegel said "Seussical the Musical is not the Cat in the Hat's meow," and Joyce Kulhawik of WBZ-TV, called the show a "confusing, moralistic brew." The Boston disaster was just the beginning of the show's troubles. By the time the show left Beantown and headed to New York, the producers, Fran and Barry Weissler, decided it was up to them to save the show from the vulturous critics in New York, only waiting for the chance to pan the show. The choice, at least in their mind, was rather simple. Either shape up or ship out. They decided to shape up, and in a matter of days had fired the original costume designer, set designer, and director. But did the Weisslers go too far? Sure, it's a dog-eat-dog world in the theater business, but getting rid of practically the entire original creative team was rather harsh, and, one can imagine, traumatic for the cast and all involved. It's amazing they didn't get rid of Ahrens and Flaherty. The dramatic move could hardly have been a morale booster for the troubled production. With the director Frank Galati out and the new director Rob Marshall in, the show underwent extensive rewriting and re-envisioning. But still, Seussical managed to open to equally negative reviews in New York. Ben Brantley of the Times panned it in a searing review in which he called the show a "flavorless broth." The show, which had only been making $40,000 a day, seemed to be on the way to the rather extensive Broadway graveyard of failed musicals with the onset of the cold January weather. Without shedding a tear, the entire New York theatre world seemed prepared to bury the musical. Rest in peace? Not exactly. Seussical proved itself to be the little show that could. Somehow, the show still managed to hang on, even though it was chugging along at a snail's pace. "I think I can, I think I can," it seemed to be saying. "Oh, I know I can," said Rosie O'Donnell in her characteristically thick Long Island accent when she entered the scene to save the day. O'Donnell, who has become somewhat of an overbearing mother to the Broadway theatre world, was determined not to let this show fail. In fact, she loved the show so much that she decided to take on the role of the Cat in the Hat from David Shiner. And another one bites the dust. The fun-loving and goofy Shiner, whose performance was hailed as one of the saving graces of the Boston production, went off to take a "vacation" for four weeks while O'Donnell doctored the show, did her shtick, and endlessly promoted her exclusive musical engagement on her talk show. One knows something is a bit off with Broadway when Rosie O'Donnell becomes the be all and end all of a musical's ultimate survival. It was no shock that ticket sales went up when O'Donnell entered the show. But perhaps they went up for the wrong reasons. Audiences are now flocking to see Seussical not because it's Seussical, but because their beloved O'Donnell is on the stage. Shows on Broadway these days are becoming simply too dependent on major stars to stay afloat. Whenever a show starts having financial problems, the original stars are booted and a glamorous replacement is found. Who can forget Susan Lucci singing "You Can't Get a Man with a Gun," in Annie Get a Gun or Kathie Lee Gifford belting out Stephen Sondheim songs in the revue Putting It Together. These all are embarrassing and painful moments that we would like to forget, but nonetheless, they are hard to ignore. One must ask the question: Is there room any more on Broadway for leads in shows that are not already big names? As Broadway budgets for shows are becoming exorbitant, a show's financial success becomes more and more important. The Weisslers may have loved David Shiner's performance in Seussical, but they love making back their $10.5 million investment in the musical even more. O'Donnell is not just a replacement for four weeks... she is the show's financial savior. This vicious cycle of big stars shoving aside the lesser-known actors seems to be inevitable these days. According to the producers, David Shiner is taking a vacation for four weeks. But who knows when he'll come back? There is already a buzz on Broadway that once O'Donnell leaves the show, yet another famous actor might replace her. Chevy Chase, Whoopi Goldberg, Tim Allen, and Tommy Tune have supposedly all been approached by the Weisslers about playing the role of the Cat in the Hat. Barry Weissler has even mentioned trying to get Brooke Shields to take over the role of Mazie the Bird, currently played by Michelle Pawk, who would be bought out of her contract if the producers were able to cut a deal. It seems that on Broadway these days, the only way to become a star is to be a movie/television star first. Even though Shiner is supposed to return to the show in a few weeks, I wouldn't exactly hold my breath.


The Setonian
News

Daily poll projects Greenberg victory

The upcoming election for student body president may be one of the most lopsided in recent memory, according to a Daily poll conducted on Thursday, Friday, and Sunday. The poll, for which the Daily questioned approximately 360 diners in Dewick, Carmichael, and the campus center, suggests that Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate Vice President Eric Greenberg has a commanding lead over Senate Treasurer Michele Shelton. Of those polled, 172 students said they favor Greenberg, and 34 chose Shelton. Still, 154 of those polled said they were either undecided, didn't know the candidates, or didn't even know there was an election - and though Shelton trails in the poll, she is confident there are enough undecided students to swing the Wednesday election. "It's going to be a close race," she said. "It's one thing for people to say who you're going to vote for, but it's going to come down to which side can actually get people out to Dewick, Carmichael, and the campus center to vote for them." Shelton plans to step up her campaign efforts among underclassmen, where Greenberg holds a sizeable lead, by going door-to-door in as many dorms as possible. "I think that the last three days of the campaign are the most important," she said. "It's going to be a tough three days, but I'm confident I can get enough undecided votes. It's those people that are important to get to in those three days. I'll be going to the dorms, talking to people in the dining halls. I hope to get to as many people as possible." Grass roots campaigning may be the deciding factor in determining the next president, as many students surveyed said that they were in favor of Greenberg because he had stopped by their rooms as part of his campaign. "I've been walking around dorms and talking to people personally," Greenberg said. "I've been trying to make the conversations less me touting myself and asking for their opinions on how to run Senate and their issues." Although the poll projects Greenberg to win the race, he says he has work to do before election day. "Things can change in a matter of days. The only results I'm going to concern myself with are the ones on Wednesday night," he said. "I have to keep talking to people because part of my campaign and part of what I want to do next year is reconnect with everyone." Broken down by class, the sophomores proved to be the most politically aware, with the fewest undecided votes, while undecided or apathetic answers were most common from seniors. The candidates will square off in an official debate in Hotung Caf?© at 7 p.m. this evening, their last official meeting before the final day of hard campaigning. Shelton, however, does not think the debate will give her an opportunity to gain ground on her opponent. "I really think that it's become more of a focused audience - the people who are there know us both already, and what we stand for," she said. Greenberg said the debate will be an opportunity to stress the differences in leadership styles between him and Shelton, as well as to focus on his theme of reconnecting with the student body. He expects questions to focus on the proposal to give voting rights to culture representatives that will be on the ballot Wednesday, as well as how both candidates would implement student outreach measures.


The Setonian
News

Art and ethnic identity

"The review continues: 'This could be understandable if the writer were a complete foreigner, but not from someone who flaunts her Indian lineage.' In other words, had I no hereditary connection to India, the story's 'stereotypical' premise would be an excusable offense. But given my family tree, and given the fact that I chose India as a subject matter, different rules apply: I should know better. And yet, given the fact that I was raised in the U.S., the review also implies that I cannot know better."_ Jhumpa LahiriTo Heaven Without Dying This quote from Jhumpa Lahiri, the recent Pulitzer Prize winner, reflects the frustration that many artists feel in the fuzzy boundaries between racial and ethnic identity and the arts. It is also an eloquent description of a problem that I personally confront as an aspiring writer. Writing short stories has been my passion for most of my life. It has been an escape from the loneliness that I often feel, as well as a canvas on which I can paint the world as I think it should be. As the years have gone by and I have become more conscious of the role that race and ethnicity play in my life and society as a whole, I have often been confused about what the nature of my writing should be, given that I am an Indian-American in the 21st century. I never really thought of myself as an Indian-American until I was halfway through high school. My writing was free then, littered with plots of car accidents and unrequited love, unhindered by worries about how a color conscious audience would read between the lines. Now I find myself hesitating before each story, before sketching any character in my head, wondering what I will unintentionally imply in my words. For example, I find myself automatically portraying my characters as ethnic Indians much of the time. Interestingly, I feel no difficulty creating characters from India, a country that I have never lived in. Logically, it would seem that the greater difference would be between Americans and Indians rather than between fellow Americans. However, often I find it easier to navigate the divide between Indians and Indian-Americans, rather than to try to portray Americans who just happen to be of a different ethnicity or race. For example, I wanted to write a story once about an interracial relationship between an African-American and an Indian-American, but I felt that somehow I was not "qualified" enough to write from the perspective of an African-American. I believe that these concerns are somewhat invalid, that the purpose of writing is to push the boundaries, that we are all human, and so each of us can relate to the experiences of another. I have spent a year in EPIIC, where I have dealt with the issues of race and ethnicity extensively, and I have come to realize the superficiality of these arbitrary pseudo-biological categories. However, even after this awareness, I am still torn between artistic freedom and racial/ethnic sensitivity. I worry that if I write as an African-American or a Latino, I am an imposer violating the sanctity of culture and personal experience. When I do write about Indian or Indian-American issues, I face a different set of pressures. Any time I describe an Indian as short, studious, or conservative, I wonder if I'm contributing to certain stereotypes. Am I responsible for representing my ethnic background? If I write about a Hindu character who beats his wife, am I unconsciously saying that Hinduism is inherently sexist? Am I a writer, a creator, or an ambassador for my racial/ethnic community? Despite these questions, I strongly believe that writers and artists deserve the freedom to express life and their worlds as they choose without the burden of being pigeonholed into being a representative for a certain racial or ethnic group. Art is fundamentally a vehicle for pushing boundaries and transcending borders. There are successful artists who break the walls that society builds around us. There are many artists who constantly reach out to others, who strive to relate to the universal human experience rather than limiting themselves to a particular slice of humanity. These are my role models, and I aspire to move beyond the questions I am struggling with now to reach that level of universality. Nonetheless, I feel that these dilemmas should be discussed. There are no certain answers, but open discourse is always constructive. I encourage all of you to think further about this issue and to share your views.Aditi Banerjee is a junior majoring in international relations.


The Setonian
News

Does ethnic conflict exist?

In 1999 alone, the world was plagued by 14 full-scale wars and several armed conflicts. In 2000, these numbers did not fluctuate much. In fact, the world experienced an increase in violence and conflict, especially in the Middle East, Congo, Sudan, Sri Lanka, South Philippines, Indonesia, the Basque Region in Spain, and Fiji. The media especially have reported many of these conflicts as ethnic in nature, leaving the impression that such violence is a result of ancient hatreds and tribal differences. Although many of these conflicts are aligned along ethnic and racial lines, it must be understood that there are many underlying factors and forces contributing to them. By referring to these conflicts as "ethnic," the real causes of the violence are ignored and not paid the attention they deserve. One good example of the misperception of an ethnic conflict is that of the one currently devastating Sri Lanka. The Sri Lankan violence has many dimensions of nationalistic, secessionist, economic, religious, and political undertones in comparison to the automatic "ethnic" labeling of the war. Perhaps the fact that the conflict is fought between differing ethnic groups gives added weight to the definition of this war as ethnic. The Tamil minority, led by the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam ("Tigers"), constitute about 17% of the country's 19 million people. The Tigers are fighting for an independent Tamil state, separate from that of the Sinhalese majority. This war has claimed the lives of more than 60,000 people, disrupted the once-promising economy, and wreaked havoc on its peoples. But what are the causes of the Sri Lankan war? The main roots are embedded in the politics and economics within the country. Upon independence from Great Britain in 1948, Sri Lanka was seen as a beacon of hope to the rest of the world as having a peaceful transition to democracy. During its colonization, the British had brought ethnic Tamils to Sri Lanka as tea plantation laborers, once one of the nation's booming industries. These Tamils differed from the indigenous Sinhalese in language and religion; Tamils are mainly Hindu and Roman Catholic and the Sinhalese mainly Buddhist. It was during the 1950s that Sinhalese was made the official language of Sri Lanka, causing much uproar among the Tamils for equality of the two main languages. This inevitably started the fight of the Tamils for equal status and an independent nation. As can be seen by delving further into the actual history of this conflict, there are many other factors at work in addition to the ethnic component; nationalism, religion, economics and politics all play a huge role in the perpetuation of the violence. We would be more accurate to say that this conflict is a "civil war." By broadening the label, we can encompass more of the factors instead of simply ethnicity. The danger in calling a conflict "ethnic" is that it has very negative connotations. An "ethnic" war often carries the perception that there can be no resolution between the fighting parties because the source of the problem is one of ancient, primordial hatreds. It must be understood that other factors of politics, economics, religion, historical legacy of colonialism, etc. are all important in explaining the causes of the violence. Maybe if we were not too quick to label conflict as "ethnic," we would be working to solve the problems more expediently.


The Setonian
News

Dartmouth adjusts financial aid; other schools follow suit

Dartmouth College announced an adjustment to its financial aid packages on Wednesday that reduces work and loan expectations for its incoming class and adds $1.6 million to the school's scholarship resources. Dartmouth's financial aid modification is the latest in a series of similar changes at other highly selective universities. Princeton, Harvard, and MIT have each announced changes to their financial aid programs this semester, in a trend that other institutions are likely to follow. The "ripple effect," according to William Eastwood, Tufts' director of financial aid, will not soon subside. "If other Ivies or schools go in that direction, then it can start to trickle down to [Tufts'] competitive pool," he said, adding that, for now, Tufts is not planning changes to its financial aid structure. Dartmouth's typical first-year financial aid student will see a reduction of between $1,225 and $1,500 annually in loans, and a decrease of $275 for the scholarship's work expectation component. These changes come thanks in part to a 46 percent increase in Dartmouth's endowment, according to an article in The Dartmouth. Dartmouth is not currently able to extend the full changes to upperclassmen, Karl Furstenberg, the Dartmouth dean of admissions and financial aid, told The Dartmouth. This plan comes three months after Princeton's announcement to drop the loan requirements from its typical financial aid package. Princeton, which has the greatest per capita endowment of any university in the country, eliminated university loans to lessen the amount of debt students have when they graduate. Princeton's plan is an effort to help students reduce their post-graduation debt. "We're trying to [find] a better way to treat parents and students," said Princeton's director of financial aid, Don Betterton. The change "was more dramatic and more expensive because Princeton had an influx of money to join other money put aside," he said. These funds came from the school's capital campaign and other donated money. According to Eastwood, Princeton administrators made the adjustment because "they literally have more money than they know what to do with." Harvard's decision to add $2,000 to financial aid packages and MIT's move to reduce its students' "self-help" component of financial packages followed closely after Princeton's announcement. Harvard, for its part, decided not to replace loans completely because the schools wants to give students choice of how to finance their college tuition. After lowering the self-help amount of the financial aid package two years ago, Harvard decreased the package again, according to the school's director of financial aid, Sally Donahue. The first change was "so successful in terms of enabling students to have greater flexibility... so they wouldn't have to work long hours, or choose to work more and borrow less depending on individual circumstances," she said. Many schools, including Tufts and the University of Pennsylvania, do not have the capacity to make similar adjustments to their packages. "It's going to be virtually impossible for any school to do," University of Pennsylvania Director of Financial Aid Bill Schilling told TheDaily Pennsylvanian (2/2701). Unlike Princeton, Tufts cannot draw all of its financial aid from its endowment, which makes it difficult for the school to broaden its offerings. "That would be five to six million dollars a year for undergraduates - not a minor thing," Eastwood said of the loan replacement option. While changes in financial aid policy at competitive schools may help their admissions offices enroll quality applicants, Donahue said that schools should focus on their own communities rather than follow any national trend. "[Colleges] are all aware of what's happening in the financial aid world, but it works best if you focus on your own institution and how you can best serve all your students," she said. The Dartmouth changes are not directly related to the announcements by the other Ivy League schools, according to Virginia Hazen, Dartmouth's director of financial aid. "Dartmouth reviews its financial aid policy every year and felt changes needed to be made. The fact that Princeton and Harvard were out there [with their decisions] was certainly impetus," she said. But the changes would have been made "regardless of whether Harvard and Princeton made changes." Several institutions made drastic alterations to their financial aid packages three years ago during another trend in reworking aid packages. At that time, schools added money to their aid funds and reconfigured the role of outside scholarships in the package. "Schools have been doing various things in their aid programs, trying not to lose that competitive edge," Eastwood said. Tufts altered its policy concerning scholarships awarded by outside organizations in 1998, decreasing the loan component of these students' financial aid packages, but leaving the grant component untouched. With the largest endowment and largest per capita endowment respectively, both Harvard and Princeton's average grants amount to $20,000. Tufts, whose endowment was ranked 87th last year, averages $14,500. Despite the disparity, Eastwood said Tufts' packages look similar to the offerings of other schools in its selectivity range. "Our aid packages are fairly competitive. Most of the students who don't come here are not [rejecting Tufts] because of aid packages," he said. Though Tufts does not plan to overhaul its financial aid packages, Eastwood said the University will try to keep loan and scholarship levels competitive as tuition charges rise. "As things go these days, our loan levels are not exorbitant - loan levels have not gone up appreciably in several years," he said.


The Setonian
News

A tax cut is great, but...

In contrast to his father, George W. Bush seems serious about a tax cut. Factor in the promised support of Congressional Democrats and an across-the-board rate reduction might actually become a reality. With the impending economic slowdown, this is welcome news to many Americans, who routinely pay around 30 to 40 percent of their income to the government. But does the cut make good political sense? Before a reduction is seriously considered, a few factors must be addressed. First, the Bush administration cites a looming recession as the reason to lower the tax burden. The logic is simple - let people keep more of their money and they will spend and invest more, boosting the economy. Although this is certainly true in the long run, tinkering with tax policy is a crude instrument for short-term economic tuning. Even if a new tax code were legislated tomorrow, it would not be in place until around 2002, and would be phased in over ten years, meaning little or no immediate economic effect. Second, it is uncertain how much of the projected budget surplus will be around in ten years. The current number is about $2 trillion - Bush's plan calls for a $1.3 trillion cut, (though that figure is likely to be closer to $1.6 trillion because debts will not be paid as quickly, increasing interest payments) leaving under $1 trillion to spare. If the predicted surplus turns out to be less, the government will have less money to use without going further into debt. Budget projections can be dangerous things. Congress went on a spending-spree this year because of the heady predictions, giving out an unprecedented $650 billion in a pork-filled bill - about $100 billion more than they are supposed to spend according to the 1997 balanced-budget agreement. If this continues, a tax cut could plunge the government well into deficit spending. To give some idea of how crazy Congressional spending can get, consider $176,000 for Alaskan reindeer herders, $1.5 million to restore a statue in Alabama, or a Nevada project to study how air passengers can get boarding passes in their hotels. Or take the spending for the Pentagon alone, which is more than the next 12 largest defense budgets combined, according to the Center for Defense Information. Even worse, once you give a program money, it becomes hard to deny it funds in the future. This is the Law of Program Inertia - programs being funded will continue to be funded unless acted upon by a concerted political force. If you want to talk tax cut, you also have to talk about more fiscal responsibility on the part of Congress. Finally, the Bush tax plan says nothing about simplifying the ridiculously complex tax code, something that it urgently needs. Beyond mere dollars and cents, there are also larger implications of a significant tax cut. First, around 30 percent of Americans do not pay income tax because their earnings are too low. On top of that, a large number pay only about 15 percent in income tax. Although the "earn more, keep more" slogan is quite nice, a tax cut is essentially meaningless for a significant portion of the population when it comes to direct benefits. If you buy the "trickle down" argument, increased spending and investment from the wealthier classes will eventually benefit the lower classes. Currently, one in ten adults and one in five children live below the poverty line in the US. Furthermore, it is estimated that one third of Americans have incomes less than twice the poverty threshold. Trickle down is cold comfort to the quarter or so of Americans who are "working poor", struggling to support their families on what little they earn. Cuts directly affect only the top half of income earners, who carry 97 percent of the tax burden, according to a recent Economist article. That is fine as long as you also give the lower half a hand as well. Income inequality continues to increase, with the average income of the lowest fifth $126,000 less than the upper fifth; to talk about lowering the burden on the wealthy without talking about helping out the poor is irresponsible. I would be much happier accepting Bush's cut if he also proposed increasing the minimum wage and increasing the earned income tax credit EITC - the program which gives a hand to working Americans earning less than about $30,000 a year - even if it meant a more modest reduction. There is broad public support for progressive taxation, meaning the wealthy pays a higher percentage of their income than the poor. And although everybody loves to complain about high taxes, rates in America are far lower than in pretty much every European country. For the vast majority of families, taxes are as low as they have been in the past 20 or 30 years, according to the Brookings Institution. Additionally, the US lifts only 29 percent of its poor out of poverty through wealth redistribution, lower than almost any other developed European country. Although it can be risky to compare different countries in such a way, it should suffice to generally demonstrate that Americans pay lower taxes and have less effective anti-poverty programs than do Europeans. Thus, the Bush cut will have little immediate economic effect, is based on optimistic assumptions about the surplus (and Congress not spending that surplus), and does nothing to simplify the tax code. Everyone wants lower taxes, which is completely understandable. However, cutting the burden on the rich without helping out the poor is a selfish policy. To sum up, a tax cut is great as long as it also addresses rising income inequality and runaway Congressional spending, as well as simplifies the complex taxation laws. Budget predictions must be reasonable and must not be viewed as gospel. For me to buy a new Ferrari now, anticipating earning massive amounts of money when I am 30, is irresponsible. As the government lavishly spends its citizens' money and enacts a huge tax cut based on anticipated future earnings, it is mortgaging the future for short-term political benefits.