Tufts athletic teams are implementing the ideal policy in the face of rising alcohol problems on campus: self-regulation.
Tufts' Athletics Department only maintains a blanket policy banning drinking while representing the University, though many teams have taken further steps to distinguish themselves. It is commendable for the football team to only allow drinking on Saturdays, and even to have the fortitude to enforce its policy among upperclassmen.
Every time a Jumbo steps on to the field, up to the line, or into the pool, they should be putting forth their best effort for themselves and the University community. Abuse of alcohol only impairs athletes from reaching the pinnacle of achievement. It is important for all of us to follow this example and ensure that every time we represent Tufts it is in the best faith.
Other Tufts organizations have taken similar steps in self-control. The Greek Working Group was created to resolve issues facing fraternities and sororities. Additionally, BACCUS and GAMMA foresees the permission of trained Greeks to monitor their own functions.
It is most logical for student organizations to control their own behavior. Through positive peer pressure and informed understanding of the situations they face, their opinions are most valuable.
Any self-regulatory body improves the functioning of organizations. There is no need for outside interference, which only adds costs to both parties. When police and other outside enforcers become involved, their presence breeds resentment and is counterproductive. Instead of focusing on achievement, policies are lambasted and loopholes are sought out.
By delegating alcohol policy decisions to senior members of the team, many of the teams have successfully shown that students and athletes can responsibly control their behavior. In addition, any policy decisions made are more credible to both those involved and outsiders. When groups choose to enforce and implement their own policies, they allow the University to focus on more important problems, confident in the ability of insiders.
Peer leaders not only hold the respect of younger members, but they also have the experience and wisdom necessary to make informed decisions. After having spent many games and seasons in brown and blue, these athletes understand the implications of abusing alcohol.
While many teams have standing policies, others take on a more ad hoc approach. The means is not important here, so long as the teams establish controls which will enhance their performance without sacrificing personal enjoyment.
Regardless of whatever hat, helmet or cap a Jumbo may wear, everyone is first and foremost a student. Part of this involves enjoying oneself, and being able to relax after an achievement. Many teams implement policies which may be considered strict by some, and they must be careful not to suffocate members of the team burdened with rules.
But this is much less likely to happen with student control, rather than University oversight. This form of regulation should be encouraged among all student organizations. It is harder for underclassmen to look at seniors as demanding authority figures versus grown administrators and police officers. and the University must allow students the opportunity to develop credibility as regulatory bodies. The choice to consume alcohol is a personal decision, and among tight knit groups, self control leads to responsible choices.
