Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Despite progress in numbers, racial diversity still an issue

Just under two hundred high school seniors, all representing various minority groups, will arrive on campus this afternoon, invited by the University to get an early feel for life at Tufts. When organizers of the Students of Color Outreach Program (SCOPE) began planning the two-day event several months ago, they could not have anticipated just how much perspective the University's now-turbulent, controversy-laden atmosphere might offer the group of prospective students. There have been three separate rallies and forums on campus in past week, one drawing attention to gray areas in the University's nondiscrimination policy, one promoting awareness of women's issues and violence towards women, and one discussing the 11 individual hate crimes that have been committed on campus this fall. While the flurry of protest events has pushed these topics to the forefront of student and administrative concern, they are by no means new issues on campus. For years, the nature and caliber of diversity has ranked high on Tufts' list of persistent race issues. "There are big race issues on campus... one is the way the administration uses the word 'diversity' in general," said freshman David Wu. "For me personally, I don't think this campus is very diverse. I don't think the diversity truly represents the American society." Though Wu's words echo the sentiments of many students on campus, the administration maintains a much more positive outlook. "I think we're making progress faster in some areas than others. We are dong pretty well with students," said Vice President of Arts, Sciences, and Engineering Mel Bernstein. "If you look at campus, it doesn't look like peoples' high schools." Dean of Admissions David Cuttino agreed, adding that the admissions office is always working to improve diversity. "There's a clear interest here and support to students who bring different perspectives and experiences; we're never satisfied," he said. "We've seen improvements but we want to work on continuing to make the University more representative, and the SCOPE program is a part of that." Comparisons to the general ethnic make-up of America aside, the University's gross diversity numbers are better than ever. "In terms of race and diversity, I think we have more students of color here than ever, so I think that's very positive," said Rub?©n Stern, the Hispanic-American Coordinator of the Latino Center. Additionally, in the wake of the 1997 report of the Task Force on Race, several committees of students, faculty members, and administrators are working to deal with racial issues and questions. This is also the second year of a four-year initiative to eventually set aside $500,000 for "initiatives focused on diversity," according to Bernstein. Last year, most of the allotted money went towards meeting specific needs of the University's six culture houses, as well as bringing several high profile speakers to campus. This year, one-third of the freshmen identify themselves as students of color, and many acknowledge that the Tufts population is growing more racially diverse. Even so, many say that racial issues extend beyond simply the number of minorities on campus. "Tufts focuses a lot of getting people different experiences and different backgrounds and history with the intention of creating the best possible environment. But once you get there, there are a lot of promises there are not kept," said junior Senator Mernaysa Rivera, who is co-chair of the Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate's Culture, Ethnicity, and Community Affairs Committee. While some students point to Tufts' abundance of racial cliques as a symptom of a segregated campus, others say that such association is natural, and should not be considered a problem. "I think it's interesting in college that there's a lot of free association but it ends up being in similar racial backgrounds," senior Angel Hossain said. "I think it has to do with hyphenated (or minority) Americans. There are so many more similarities between hyphenated Americans it makes it easier because you have more in common. But, I don't think it's a bad thing, I don't think it's negative." Jenn Weng, who represents Tufts' Asian Community on the TCU Senate, was more critical of race-oriented cliques. "I've heard that some students see the Asian community as very cliquey. So that's one issue, to break that idea," she said. "I think ethnic cliquing a problem, but it's a fault of both sides. It's not strictly the Asians excluding themselves from the rest of the community... I think it's the majority's fault as well because they think, 'they just want to be in that clique.' Both sides need to make an effort to get to know each other more." Many fear that ethnic cliquing has negative consequences. "Segregation between groups, lack of communication between clubs and organizations, and lack of collaboration are all consequences of ethnic cliquing," Wu said. "And instead of having one united voice on issues dealing with racism and bigotry, you only get a small population." In addition to problems caused by ethnic cliquing, many feel that there are other, deeper dimensions to racial tensions on campus. "Nobody recognizes Arabs as a minority group and therefore we don't exist, and our problems don't exist either," said senior Dina Karam, co-president of the Arab Students Association. Karam commented that people at Tufts take a hard line towards people of her ethnicity because of historical and current political issues. "I feel that every Arab on this campus cannot speak his mind about the Middle East. We know our ideas are unpopular and we do not feel free to express them," she said. "We do not have any anti-Israel sentiments, but we don't feel free to talk about our Arab sympathies for the causes we support. "It doesn't matter if you're Jewish or not... Many people here are very, very sensitive about Jewish causes, and they consider any support of the Arab world to be anti-Jewish," she said. Extensive education, Karam says, can be an important first step to resolving many of these problems "Increased dialogue between various cultural and political groups so that we understand each other and where we're coming from [could help], so that there are no negative feelings," she said.


The Setonian
News

Tufts joins Boston area protests

Tufts students on both sides of the political spectrum mobilized for last night's presidential debate between Vice President Al Gore and Texas Governor George W. Bush at UMass-Boston. Taking advantage of the debate's close proximity, student groups, academic classes, and Tufts-connected coalitions created a virtual frenzy of political energy at Tufts and throughout the metropolitan area. Before the debate, Tufts Choice 2000, a coalition devoted to fostering political interest and dialogue in this election year, arranged for a bus to transport people to and from various political rallies around Boston. Students traveled to a Gore/Lieberman rally outside the UMass-Boston Clark Athletic Center and to Dudley Circle, where groups rallied on campaign issues and protested at the site. The Coalition for Social Justice and Nonviolence, the Ex College class "Political Domination and Student Activism," and several individuals and other class groups all marched in protest of issues that were left out of the presidential debate. They came to push specific concerns as well as to point out the shortcomings of the debate. "Look at the fact that health care being a right isn't being brought up in the debate. The death penalty, police brutality, and prisons are all also not being discussed, and the fact that they're not in this election is despicable. These candidates are saying they are for them by ignoring them," sophomore Carl Jackson said. "I'm protesting the corporate ownership of politics and encouraging serious campaign finance reform, which is a joke now," freshman Emily Good said. The day's events also provided a venue for learning about the political process. Visiting Lecturer Lee Vigilant cancelled his class, "Sociology of Social Movements," to bring his students to the rally. "What I am trying to do here is show them an example of an institutionalized protest; everything here is scripted," he said. "People are telling them how to protest, where to protest, and - to a lesser degree - what to protest.... It takes away the bite and sting." As only one of many groups at the march, Tufts students gained a wide perspective on current issues. "[The rally] was really exciting, freshman Ariana Flores said. "It's interesting to see how many different issues are being represented. We're here for campaign finance reform, but others are here to 'free Mumia,' to 'stop the bombings in Biques [Puerto Rico],' and to 'let Nader debate.'" These groups took to the streets to march and protest the mainstream political system that they say ignores their concerns. They hoped to capitalize on the debate's nationwide coverage and use it as a stage to shed light on forgotten issues. Yet there remained a sense of realism among the crowd. "It will be funny to watch the debate tonight and not hear any of the issues people are talking about here," said Good, who attended the event with her Ex College explorations class. At the other end of the political activism spectrum, a number of Tufts students went early to the debate to rally for Vice President Gore. "We were along the road to the entrance to UMass, so when the media and local press came by we were there with our signs to publicize Gore - there were thousands of people there," said sophomore Melissa Callan. While both Gore supporters and restive debate protesters rallied next to each other, their perspectives and accompanying shouted messages were worlds apart. Several Gore supporters yelled disparaging comments at the protesters. "You f--ing smell" and "Halloween's at the end of the month" were two repeated remarks. Back on campus, Tufts Choice 2000 - under the leadership of the Tufts Democrats, Tufts Republicans, and the Tufts Community Union Senate - coordinated a "debate watch" in Hotung Caf?©. Approximately 250 students attended the event. "It's interesting to hear how the comments and murmurs went through the crowd when Gore and Bush made various comments," said Greg Propper, president of Tufts Democrats and coordinator of Tufts Choice 2000. "And that was my goal for the event; to facilitate conversations on the issues." The debate watch is the kick-off to a number of Tufts Choice 2000 events this week aimed at increasing interest and awareness of politics on campus. "We're trying to create a fervent political atmosphere. This week we're concentrating on voter registration and absentee ballots," said Matt Cravens, Tufts Democrats treasurer. Earlier in the day, the University hosted the Youth Vote Conference at the Hillel Center. Dean of the University College of Citizenship and Public Service Robert Hollister was the keynote speaker at the event, which was sponsored by the Youth Vote 2000 - a coalition that includes several Tufts groups. The conference included several political awareness workshops and a debate watch at Fenway Cinemas in Copley. "The goal for today is to get students registered and to talk about what issues are very important to them," said organizer Liese Schneider, who is the student chair of MassPIRG [Public Interest Research Group]. "Politics is about numbers, and if we can show politicians we have the numbers, then we have the power [to affect change]."


The Setonian
News

Jumbos improve record with stomp on Springfield's Pride

With a dominating 91-72 victory over Springfield College on Saturday night, the men's basketball team improved its record to 2-1 on the season and ran its winning streak to two games, after a loss in the season opener to Salem State. "I thought we played with some emotion," coach Bob Sheldon said. "We had emotion the whole game. We worked our stuff and we had wide-open shots." The Jumbos were unconsious during the first half, in which they shot 54.8 percent from the field including a scorching 7-13 from three-point land. While Tufts' scintillating offense, featuring an assortment of fast breaks, three pointers, and points in the paint, highlighted the game, the real key to victory was the Jumbos' man-to-man defense. "The game plan was to play a 2-3," sophomore shooting guard Brian Shapiro said. "But man-up worked." The trio of senior starters, team captain and center Dan Flaherty, point guard Bobby Mpuku and power forward Fred Pedroletti fueled the Jumbos high-octane offense, finishing with 20, 13, and 16 points, respectively. Flaherty and Pedroletti also combined to grab 16 rebounds, while Mpuku ran the show, dishing out eight assists on the night. Senior center Tom Bernier came off the bench to contribute eight points. "Our plan was to pound inside, and then when they do that, to kick it out," Sheldon said. After Springfield began the game with a quick basket, the Jumbos went on a 7-0 run sparked by Mpuku, who hit a three pointer from the left side, and Pedroletti, who nailed a jumper and hit an easy lay-up. "We came out ready to play," Shapiro said. "It was better than the first two games. We played hard." The Jumbos ran the score up to 20-6 early when Shapiro caught on fire, draining three consecutive three pointers from the same spot on the right side of the arc. Shapiro, who entered the game as Tufts' second leading scoring (15 ppg) ended the half with nine points and finished with 15 overall, after connecting on 4-8 three point attempts. "Brian is a shooter," Sheldon said. "We gave him the green light. We are going to stick with him." "We were feeling it tonight," Shapiro said. "Everybody was hitting their shots." Sophomore guard Lee Neugebauer, who entered the game averaging only 1 ppg, also heated up, scoring six quick points, including a three pointer from the right side with 9:04 left in the first half. "I felt I played under control," Neugebauer said. "I played my game. I didn't force anything." With approximately a minute to go in the half, Springfield closed the gap to 11, before Mpuku nailed another three pointer from the right side, pushing the Jumbos halftime advantage to 46-32. "[Mpuku's] three at the end of the half was a nail in the coffin," Neugebauer said. "They had the momentum, but his three deflated any chance of them getting back." With the game virtually decided in the first half, the Jumbos worked hard not to become complacent and allow the Pride back into the game. Flaherty began the Tufts scoring in the second half, hitting a jumper from the left side. Then, at the 19:20 mark and with the shot clock running down, the big center drained a three from the top of the arc. The ball hit the back of the rim and bounced straight up before gliding into the basket, demonstrating how on the Jumbos were. After playing sparingly in the first half, Tufts went to the three-guard offense for much of the second stanza, and fleet-footed freshman point guard Phil Barlow got to show off his stuff. With the lightning-fast Barlow running the show from the one spot, the Jumbos went to their run-and-gun offense. Barlow scored seven of his eight points in the second half. The youngster also sparked the defense using his speed to pressure the opposing point guard. Following Pedroletti's tip in with 10:54 left in the half, Barlow's play of the day came when he cut in front of a Springfield player to make a steal and took the ball coast to coast for easy lay-up. "We're smaller when I play," the 5-11, 150-lb. Barlow said. "So we play more up-tempo. We have lots of shooters and we run and score." "Barlow is a great player and he is going to get better and better," Sheldon said. Barlow and the rest of the Jumbos will look to extend their winning streak against Babson when they tip off at 8 p.m. on Tuesday in Cousen's Gym.


The Setonian
News

Imitation' Dead show in Somerville this weekend

Face it - Jerry Garcia is dead, and the Dead aren't about to start a weak revival tour. If you haven't seen a Grateful Dead show in your life, it's a little late to start. You've missed out on the obsessive touring, the burritos, the shoes, socks, and neckties made of hemp, and the full wardrobe of dancing bear T-shirts. Or have you? The Dark Star Orchestra is coming to Somerville tomorrow night, and it's cashing in on the tradition and cult following of the Grateful Dead with an incomparable idea: recreating actual Grateful Dead concerts from beginning to end. It's a unique idea that no one else seems to have taken up yet. The band formed in November of 1997, and recreates every last detail of the shows - an amazing feat considering that the Grateful Dead were famous for their improvised jam concerts. With the popularity and availability of bootleg tapes from every imaginable concert, most people have little trouble finding recordings of their favorite shows. There's something to be said, however, for the power and energy of a live performance. A screaming crowd and an enraptured band make the experience more immediate - albeit more expensive. So go for the culture and go for the music, even if you can't go for Jerry anymore.The Dark Star Orchestra will perform this Saturday night at 8:30 p.m. at the Somerville Theatre (55 Davis Sq.). Tickets are $18.50, and can be purchased by phone at 931-2000.


The Setonian
News

Many contenders, one champion

On this Monday's RAW, the WWF once again proved why its fan base is growing so quickly. The combination of wrestling, comedy, and sexual exploitation is the perfect magnet to attract the young male demographic. Add in muscular men in tights and the female demographic falls under a similar spell. This week, the WWF unleashed on its audience more outlandish plots then ever before. In one of the first matches of the night, the WWF Women's Division champion, Lita, defended her title against the blond bombshell Trish Stratus in a Bra and Panties match - the object of the contest being to strip one's opponent down to her bra and panties. After a little hair pulling and scratching, Lita managed to strip Trish down to her undergarments, much to the delight of the audience, while losing only her top in the process. After the match, the Right to Censor, which continues to expand in membership, approached the ring to scorn the perpetrators of what they deemed unnecessary indecent exposure. They also introduced their new member, Ivory, who went on to explain that she will be fighting the good fight for real men who want to view properly dressed, real women, as opposed to scandalously dressed ones. In another humorous sequence, Chyna took her revenge on The Godfather's ex-Hos, who last week was caught in the shower with Eddie Guerrero, her ex-fiancee. After explaining to them that she was glad that they helped her to see what kind of man he was, she proceeded to give them a beating, and left their lifeless bodies dangling from a mangled bedframe. Though actually providing concrete endings to storylines is very uncharacteristic of the WWF, the next segment concluded one of the more confusing storylines. Commissioner Mick Foley's backstage cameras helped him to reveal the true identity of the mysterious Conquistador?©s tag team. Several weeks ago, the commissioner denied Edge and Christian another title shot against the Hardy Boyz. In response to this rejection, the two decided to masquerade as Los Conquistadores and win the title. Next, Edge and Christian would pay another pair of men to disguise themselves as Los Conquistadores and lose the belts. After the Commissioner saw the video footage of Edge and Christian revealing their plot, he allowed the Hardy Boyz to dress themselves as the Conquistadores, and win the titles back. In what was perhaps the highlight of the evening, Chris Benoit approached the ring and finally admitted, in a very heartfelt oration, that competitive drive, skill, and determination mean nothing in the WWF. From now on, he said, he would be following suit with a match-meddling manager or valet of his own. In the main event of the evening, the new WWF champion, Kurt Angle, was forced to defend his newly won title against Triple-H and the Rock in a three-way contest. After the usual array of stunts and tradeoffs in the command of the match, Rikishi decided to approach the ring in order to help the Rock, despite the fact that earlier in the program, the Rock told Rikishi to stay out of his business with a definitive Rock Bottom. Then, in a predictable but still exciting move, Stone Cold Steve Austin managed to post bail, after attempting vehicular assault against Rikishi the previous night. Then, he flew to the arena in Hartford just in time to run in and take out Rikishi and Kurt Angle before the program came to an end. All in all, RAW provided a humorous and entertaining program as it does time and time again. The only thing missing was an appearance by the random naked guy who runs around streaking the crowds.


The Setonian
News

Minimum campus wage rises

In order to keep pace with the growing job market in the city of Boston, Student Employment increased its minimum starting salary to $7 per hour at the beginning of the semester. The wage has been rising consistently over the past few years, as Student Employment has had difficulties attracting students to on-campus jobs. "We always have to be fair. We're competing with the Boston job market. In order for students to want to work on campus, they need to get a decent pay rate," Student Employment Director Joanne Grande said. "We are bringing up the minimum wage in compliance with Massachusetts' upcoming statewide increase to $6.75, which is scheduled to come into effect in January." The changes adds an additional dollar to the minimum wage established at the beginning of last year. According to Grande, however, very few students will actually receive more money because of the new policy. "While it may seem like higher starting salaries would raise interest in on campus employment, the increase is not really affecting hiring. Only 30 or 40 students were not already making this new minimum," Grande said. "Our students tend to have a lot of experience in the workforce before coming to campus, and such experience entitles them to higher starting salaries. We're dealing with a pretty skilled audience here." The wage increase does serve to make on-campus jobs seem more attractive, however. Dining Services, which has been consistently understaffed for the past few years, saw a rise in the number of students interested in working for them this year. "We're still not fully staffed, but we're not in desperate need like we were last year," Daytime Student Manager Dorian Maynard said. Dining Services is reviewing its pay schedule, and may raise wages even more. Because of the pay increase on campus, Maynard said that there has been competition among employers for student labor. Grande did not specify where the funds to pay students more will come from. "I can't really answer that, but the proposal was approved by the vice president. If he approves it, I guess they find the money somewhere," she said. While departments that hire students can look to the University to support the change in the wages they pay, the increased wages have caused problems for student organizations who hire students. Groups that are self-supporting, such as Tufts Student Resources (TSR) and The Tufts Daily are having trouble balancing their budgets because of the unanticipated labor costs. The Student Employment Office provides a written pay scale that describes various types of jobs and their allotted minimum and maximum pay increments. Those who have no previous work experience or training, and work with significant supervision, receive a starting minimum of $7. The more experience a student has, the more money he or she is entitled to earn. Students working on specialized projects or who have received extensive training can earn up to $10.50 per hour while working on campus. Freshman Amy Spindel, who works at the Women's Center, feels that Student Employment is very fair about setting its wages. "My job is very interesting, but if it was an off-campus job, I think I'd probably be getting only the national minimum wage." "If you think about it, with many of the secretarial jobs on campus, people can sit there and do their homework while still being paid $7.50 an hour," another student said. Although students working on campus were pleased to be paid more, they still find faults with the employment scene on campus. According to Grande, for most on-campus jobs, work-study students are given priority because "the employment will help meet the educational needs of the student." The preference given to work-study students has driven many to look elsewhere for employment. Freshman Jackie Fields had difficulty finding a job on campus because she is not on work-study. "You think you got the job, and then they ask you if you're work-study. Once they found out I wasn't, they rescinded the offer," said Fields, who is now working late hours in a restaurant in Harvard Square on weekends. "I got a call from Dowling a week later offering me a non-work-study position, but, by that time, I already had my off-campus job." Student Employment does have a recruiting service for students like Fields who have difficulty finding work on campus. "We have some great jobs, we're only five minutes from Boston. Most students don't know about this service, but we can definitely find anyone a job, whether it be on campus or off," Grande said. There are approximately 2,500 undergraduate students working on Student Employment's hourly payroll, according to Grande. Of these, approximately 1,500 students are awarded work-study stipends. Some of the most popular on campus positions include website design, computer work, and office assistants.



The Setonian
News

Time to work

It's that time of year again, when the procrastination has to stop and you need to finish that paper you've known about since the second day of classes. You need something to keep you going -besides coffee - something with a beat. This mix of songs offers some fast tunes, with a couple relaxing ones thrown in for fun. Together, they make a good excuse to take a little break from the monotony of endless typing (not that you won't take one every 15 minutes, anyway). And don't fear... there's some music thrown in for when you get stressed and are ready to shoot your computer.Side A "Ecstasy" (Rusted Root) "Keep Hope Alive" (The Crystal Method) "Rock The Boat" (The Hues Corporation) "Hey Ladies" (Beastie Boys) "Underground" (Ben Folds Five) "American Girl" (Tom Petty) "Jump N' Shout" (Basement Jaxx) "Chalk Dust Torture" (Phish) "Chains Of Love" (Erasure) "Dammit" (Blink 182) "Temptation" (Heaven 17) "S.R." (Reel Big Fish)Side B "Kalifornia" (Fatboy Slim) "Think About The Way" (Ice MC) "Weird Science" (Oingo Boingo) "N 2 Gether Now" (Limp Bizkit featuring Method Man) "Disseminated" (Soul Coughing) "Disco 2000" (Pulp) "Bodyrock" (Moby) "Low Rider" (War) "Paradise City" (Guns N' Roses) "Just What I Needed" (The Cars) "Running Two" (Tykwer/Klimek/Heil)


The Setonian
News

Cruising Around Town

We here at the Daily are just as obsessive about our mix tapes as you are... maybe more. So rather than have you waste your time coming up with perfectly coordinated 45-minute sides, we're glad to waste ours and present the Monday Mix Tape of the Week. Don't like it? Scrounge up some CDs and see if you can do any better.


The Setonian
News

Lackluster Jumbos show little spirit at Homecoming

As the Jumbo football team hit its downward spiral this past Saturday, the people in the stands and drunk tailgaters couldn't have cared less. Other than a handful of cheering fans with bullhorns and pom poms, the crowd was fairly indifferent as it witnessed yet another Tufts' Homecoming loss. "Tufts has no school spirit. You go to any sort of event that's school sponsored and no one is there. No one is proud of their alma mater. How many people even know the school song? Its really embarrassing," sophomore Myra Cocolicchio said. While sports fans at other schools will paint their faces with school colors and scream bloody murder for a touchdown, Jumbos - by and large - sit relatively still. Senior Alfred Cazeau noted that the game protocol is different at Tufts. At other schools, students come to watch the game, he said. Here, however, he said that people watch the game by default. "[People were] like 'I'm tired of drinking, let me go watch the game,'" Cazeau said. He admitted that he, too, prefers the more social aspect of the game. "The only reason I went to Homecoming was to see alumni and tailgate," he said, revealing that he was only at the game for five minutes. While many seniors are familiar with the sentiments of Cazeau's observations, some freshmen are not. Freshman Rebecca Anderson, who went to her first Tufts football game on Saturday, was struck by the number of fans. "I was really impressed to see how many people were out there. It was more than I expected," she said. She did, however, note the paucity of noise in the stands - a phenomenon she couldn't quite understand. "The crowd was pretty quiet [during] the game...and I couldn't figure out why."The general lack of school spirit was evident at Thursday's pep rally, a poorly attended pre-game event intended to fire up students. "It's very sad that no one showed up to the pep rally. Two-thirds of the people at the pep rally were athletes. The rest were Senate people and random people who wanted free stuff," said Cocolicchio. Cazeau did not attend the rally, but he spoke with one football player who was disappointed with the turnout and its implications in terms of fans. "[The player] was so pissed and I could see why. When you're playing a sport and you're not getting paid, you're doing it for the love of the game. Knowing that the school support is behind you helps a lot," he explained. Junior Eric Lindsey said that there are very few things that get students up and moving. A post-rally party wasn't even enough. "There was a party [after the pep rally], but everyone took off," he said. While Tufts students were less than enthused, Williams jubilantly cheered its Purple Cows to victory on the opposite side of the field. This frustrated some. "Our crowd was absolutely silent. Then, you went across to the Williams side and they had planned cheers, people were actually animated, cheering the team, and calling out the players' names," Cocolicchio said. "Now that's school spirit," Cazeau added, who used to play lacrosse for Tufts. "What's the possibility of Tufts being at Williams and showing up with a crowd that huge?" he asked, adding that certain schools bus students to away games. "If we're away, you're lucky to see a teammate's parent show up. The Williams crowd was so packed you would think it was their homecoming," Cazeau said. Though Williams sports a seemingly impressive display of spirit, Tufts students are aware that their cheering is a result of Williams' greater emphasis on sports. "[Williams] has to do a lot of recruiting and they have a lot of good athletes. Their teams win a lot and they advance in tournaments. They have their reputation for having good teams. It's more of a tradition thing with them," Lindsey said. Despite the realization that schools like Williams foster more spirit, Tufts' student frustration persists - especially when they reflect on personal experiences. Some note a discrepancy in high school and college school spirit. "When it came to our rivals, people were all decked out in our school colors, ready to cheer and support any team or any thing that's going on," Cocolicchio said. Anderson also enjoyed greater spirit at her high school, even without the hallmark sports team. "My high school didn't even have a football team, but we had a lot of school spirit for the other teams," she said. Despite the lack of spirit, students don't foresee a change in the dispirited student body. "I don't think people like Tufts enough at this point to want to cheer for our school. We don't have the pride that we should have for whatever reason. People aren't happy with the social life, or it wasn't their first choice and they don't want to be here," Cocolicchio said, noting that some major changes must be made before this problem is rectified. "[The administration is] going to have to make the quality of life on campus better so people will be happy with the school; so they want to be part of the Tufts community," Cocolicchio said. Cazeau agreed that Tufts just doesn't seem to push spirit on its students. "You keep talking about things and they claim changes are being made - in reality you never see the changes," he said. Cazeau jokingly traces his thoughts on Tufts "spirit" during his tenure here. "My first two years, I thought things could only get better. By senior year, I have come to the realization that I'm only here for an education," he said. "There's this thing called campus life and Tufts does not have it." If changes did roll around, however, students seem to think that things would look up on the Hill. "The more pride, the higher the morale. [The school will] get more money from us in the future, when we're alumni," Cocolicchio pointed out.


The Setonian
News

Transition year' likely for women's cross country team

The women's cross country team stunned its New England rivals in 1999 by qualifying for the National Championships and finishing 16th overall. Now, having lost that squad's two top runners to graduation, the Jumbos are faced with a number of uncertainties as they start their new season.


The Setonian
News

Unblemished Ephmen could spell trouble for the Jumbos

This Saturday could be a homecoming to remember, or one to forget, for the men's soccer team. The Williams Ephmen come to Medford as the number-one men's soccer team in Division III, and the game could have playoff implications for both teams. Tufts is coming off a 7-4 win over the Lasell Lasers on Wednesday afternoon. The game against Lasell was a non-conference game against an over-matched, but spirited, opponent, and essentially served as a tune-up for Saturday's homecoming date with Williams. "I was experimenting a bit today," coach Ralph Ferrigno said afterwards. "I was trying some players in different positions." While Tufts did score a number of goals, the most important event of the game came with 12 minutes to go in the second half, when sophomore starter Garrett Dale went down with an ankle injury. Dale, the team's fourth leading scorer with six points, on three goals, was replaced in the game by freshman Alex Berg, who scored the seventh and final goal. "I'm not expecting him to play against Willams," Ferrigno said. (DOES THIS REFER TO DALE OR BERG?????) The Ephs remain undefeated and untied with seven NESCAC wins and 11 overall. Williams has never trailed in any game this season. "Our goal at this point is to win the last three games of the season and the NESCAC tournament," Williams assistant coach Jim Watts said. "After that, we will start thinking of bigger things." The Jumbos enter their last NESCAC home game of the season at 6-3-2 overall and 3-2-2 in conference games. Tufts is locked in a battle for fourth place in the NESCAC with Amherst, and could certainly use another victory to help them in the race. Williams plays aggressive soccer, attacking the goal even when holding the lead. Thanks in large part to this offensive-minded game plan, the Ephs have out shot opponents 294-96 this season and outscored them 45-11. Five of the top ten scorers in the NESCAC hail from Williams, including the top three; sophomore Alex Blake (33 points), junior Ted Giannocopoulos (20 points), and junior Josef Powell (18 points). Freshman Khari Stevenson and senior Mike Cortese share fifth place with 14 points. Blake has scored 15 goals in ten games this year, nine goals more than the next best in the NESCAC. He was the NESCAC Rookie of the Year last season, and has been named NESCAC Player of the Week twice so far this year. "He's a special player, obviously," Watts said. "He's had an exceptional year. He is one of the most talented players in the nation." Defensively, the team features an experienced back line and goalkeeper co-captain Ryan Spicer, whose GAA of 0.77 is good for third best in the NESCAC. Still, defense is an area that Williams' coaches would like to see improved. "We score a lot of goals, but we're giving up about one a game," Watts said. "A lot of them have come on middie breakdowns late in the game. Most of our opponents' goals have come late in the game." Williams' most recent victory over Amherst was an example of this. The Ephs led the game 2-0 in the second half, but allowed the Lord Jeffs back within striking distance with a goal halfway through the second half. The 2-1 win over Amherst was only the second time this season that the Ephs have failed to win by more than one goal. Tufts also comes into the game in good shape. The Jumbos have won three straight and three of their last four NESCAC games. The Jumbos will have the home field advantage, and the Homecoming festivities should serve as additional motivation. "Homecoming does have an effect," MacGregor said. "We always have our best crowds for Homecoming, and it really helps you get up for the game." If previous matchups between the two teams are any indicator, the large crowd should get an impressive show. While Tufts is 0-4-1 in its last five games against the Ephs, it has played as well against Williams as anybody. All four Jumbo losses ended in 1-0 scores. Last season's matchup took place in the rain and mud of Williamstown. Thirty-four seconds into the game, Blake connected on a pass from Powell to give Williams a one-goal lead. It would be all that the Ephs would need, as the game was scoreless from then on. Williams out shot the Jumbos 25-10, but the defense and McDermid (six saves) kept the Brown and Blue close. That 1-0 score was the closest that any NESCAC team came to Williams last year. Since 1990, Williams has been the most dominant team in New England in Division III. Williams is 135-19-18 during that span, outscoring opponents 379-113. "They are a very good program, very well organized," Ferrigno said. "Then again, so are we."


The Setonian
News

Layman's ignorance

Craig Waldman's column "Lessons in Diplomacy" (9/21) accurately depicts the layman's ignorance of international affairs. Waldman's assertion that Ambassador Stephen Bosworth is an "obscure" choice for the new dean of the Fletcher School and represents a "step backward" for the graduate school of Tufts University reflects the ignorance of international affairs in America today.


The Setonian
News

TUPD is slap happy with handcuffs

Last Sunday, there were new rumors that even more people were arrested over the weekend at parties around Tufts campus. Only three weeks into my senior year, I have heard about more arrests of Tufts students than I remember happening during the past three years combined. Stories of the first few incidents were passed around campus, with the unlucky few being both pitied and teased.... That is, until the "few" started becoming greater in number, and the stories became more frequent in telling. Now there is a report that a Fletcher party was broken up, where members of a certain police force were, again, slap happy with their handcuffs. The police presence around campus is ever growing, much to the chagrin of Jumbos, many of whom are asking the same question I am. What happened over this past summer, that suddenly our campus is constantly being patrolled by both campus and city police officers, who feel the need to curb much of the weekend social scene around campus? This question needs to be answered. If something happened over the summer that would merit this increased police presence, then, as a student body, we have the right to know. If nothing in particular happened, though, what is this new social policy about, and why has it come into place with such an iron fist? It is easy to say that this is a problem only affecting a small portion of the Tufts population, and that we should be worried about things other than partying around campus. Well, guess what? The real issue does not lie in the diminished party scene on campus. Rather, it lies in the fact that Tufts students are beginning to experience feelings of apprehension directed towards those entrusted most heavily with the job to protect and serve us. More and more, I have been hearing students express their distrust and disgust towards police officials. On the other side of the coin, I have seen instances where it seems like the feeling is mutual on the side of officials, and this is troublesome to say the very least. On one particularly regulated night, I thought my friends and I were pretty much removed from the wrath, since we were off campus and watching TV. The aftermath of a party a few weekends ago had squad cars patrolling up and down Winthrop Street for at least a half hour ordering people, who were obviously on their way back to their homes already, to "move it along" and "go home." I was watching this scene with five of my friends when a police officer from TUPD drove up and screamed at us for nothing more than sitting on a porch. (As a point, we did not have anything on the porch that would have raised cause for this order.) I bring up this example because it demonstrates the aggressive mentality that many people on this campus are sensing. Those of us who were ordered inside an off-campus apartment were upset, not because our non-existent party was broken up, but because we felt that our rights were being usurped. That may be strong language, but how else were we supposed to feel if we couldn't even sit on a porch at 11:30 p.m. without being treated like children who were out past their bedtimes? Of course we need security around campus. But what kind of message is being sent to us when random gatherings, of any size, are being broken up quickly and swiftly, while, when a real emergency arises, there is a wait to get through to the operator on duty? This unfortunately happened a few weeks ago, when it took almost five minutes to get through to someone on the emergency telephone line following a serious accident on campus. If University and security officials feel that there is a real problem on campus, then let us know by telling us. Destroying any semblance of a social scene we have on campus with your whole security force and threatening arrests are not appropriate methods of communication. Likewise, breaking up any and all parties around campus is not a viable solution. All this is doing is driving people to drink heavily behind closed doors, where it can't be regulated. Communication is the key to solving this problem before it gets to the point that relations between students and officials are completely severed. Moira Poe is a senior double majoring in political science and American studies.


The Setonian
News

Feast your eyes on Thanksgiving-themed flick

Sometimes a movie tries to take on too many stories at once. It presents dozens of characters, excessive dilemmas, and divergent story lines that can only try to come together in the end. What's Cookin', directed by Gurinder Chadha, is a perfect example. It overwhelms the audience with over 40 speaking characters composing four distinct families. The movie jumps from one family to the next, slowly revealing problem after problem. By the end, the film has covered just about every dilemma a dysfunctional family can go through. The idea behind What's Cookin' is relatively simple - a peek inside four different homes in Los Angeles during the celebration of Thanksgiving. The audience is able to witness how four families with distinct ethnic backgrounds celebrate an American holiday. Chadha, however, feels the need to convolute the plot with myriad over-the-top traumas that distract the audience from the original theme. Yet another problem is the stereotyping that abounds in each family's Thanksgiving celebration. Is it necessary to assure the audience that African Americans need macaroni and cheese on the Thanksgiving table, or that Asian Americans pick up their KFC drumsticks with chopsticks? Among the four families there is a rich and successful African-American family, the Williams. Audrey (Alfre Woodard) is a loving mother who is torn between her estranged son and her cheating husband. Audrey wants more than anything to keep the family together, even if it means putting everyone's needs before her own. The Avila family brings tension to the screen. Mother Elizabeth (Mercedes Ruehl) is separated from her husband of many years, Javier (Victor Rivers), after he is caught philandering with Elizabeth's cousin. Elizabeth wants a nice family Thanksgiving, without Javier. Tensions mount, however, when her son invites him anyway. One of the more humorous families is the Seeligs. Ruth and Herb (Lainie Kazan and Maury Chaykin, respectively) are hilarious as a Jewish couple trying to come to terms with their daughter's homosexuality. Their daughter Rachel (Kyra Sedgwick) brings her longtime lover Carla (Julianna Marguilies) to Thanksgiving dinner, ensuring a night of awkwardness and trouble. The fourth family is the Nguyens, who emigrated from Vietnam around 15 years ago. Trinh (Joan Chen) is worried that her children are being overly Americanized. She has reason to fear when she discovers a condom in her daughter's jacket pocket and learns that her son has a gun. The connection between these four families is only revealed in the end with a "surprise" that is less than satisfactory. In fact, any distinct connection between the film's very different families seems highly unlikely. To its credit, the film is an amazing culinary experience. The cinematographer is the award-winning Jong Lin (Eat Drink Man Woman) and he does a superb job in capturing the sight, smell, and warmth of the food. You can practically taste it! If there's one thing this movie truly succeeds in, it's in preparing everyone for the holiday season. Watching the exquisite food being prepared, seeing family members reunited... there's no mistaking it: the holidays are upon us.


The Setonian
News

The making of a good president

What do people really want from their president? If it were that easy to answer, then most campaign analysts and political pundits would be unemployed. Although the answer to this question can easily become complicated and convoluted, I believe it is really quite simple - we want someone who can make our lives better.Our individual ideas about who this person is will vary depending on our needs and priorities, but let's think for a moment about who will make our collective lives better. The Democratic party and Al Gore are about empowerment. George W. Bush's mantra for the past six months has been, "Instead of trusting the government, I trust you." This sounds great, but what it really means is, "I will leave the forces of nature to do as they will with you." He believes that if you have money or resources, you should do what you want with them. But if you don't... well, then he doesn't believe that it's the government's responsibility to help you.Empowerment, on the other hand, isn't about growing the federal government by enormous amounts or about not trusting the American people. It is about providing opportunities for people who need help. It is about sharing our prosperity so that it benefits not just those who already have money, but those who are working hard to better their lives. It is about the "American Dream".Empowerment is embodied in affirmative action, labor unions, and education for all Americans. It is embodied in a woman's right to choose, environmental protection, and a balanced budget. Al Gore believes that all people should be afforded the same opportunities regardless of race, gender, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. Al Gore believes in the rights of the working class to be protected with a higher minimum wage and health care benefits. Al Gore believes in tax credits for higher education, performance testing for public school students and teachers, and universal pre-school. Al Gore believes that a woman should have the right to make decisions about her own body. Al Gore believes that we should protect and preserve our natural resources so that we don't limit our options in the future. Al Gore believes that we should balance the budget every year and pay down the national debt so that we can spend our money in productive ways. Gore's stance on these issues shows that he believes in giving people the power to affect their own lives. The federal government has an important role to play in making this happen, but that doesn't make Gore, or the Democrats, "big spending, Washington cronies." The problem with George W. Bush is that he doesn't understand what government really is - the American people. We are a self-governed body and by using our collective resources to execute our collective will we can make our collective lives better. That is Al Gore's vision and that is why he will be the best president.Megan Dooley is a senior majoring in international relations. She is currently teaching an exploration class entitled "The Making of a President: The 2000 Election."


The Setonian
News

Nurses, thieves and stalkers headline fall film fare

With Labor Day acting as the unofficial close of summer, it's time to start looking forward to fall. New classes, new foliage, and... new releases! This Friday there are lots of exciting movies on the way, with comedies from seasoned actors and action flicks from newcomers, all sure to tempt a moviegoer's palette. My Five Wives Director: Sidney J. Furie (Superman IV, Iron Eagle, Ladybugs) Starring: Rodney Dangerfield, John Byner, Andrew Dice Clay If you enjoy Rodney Dangerfield's sense of humor, My Five Wives is sure to please fans. Dangerfield not only stars in the film, but also co-wrote the screenplay, so prepare yourself for an overload of one-liners and cheap jokes. As with most Dangerfield films, the plot seems to be merely an excuse for him to engage in his antics and showcase his comedy routine. Here, he stars as a real estate developer who moves to Utah to build a ski resort... and somehow manages to acquire five wives while avoiding the mobsters who hope to spoil his developing plans. Your guess is as good as mine. Nurse Betty Director: Neil LaBute (In the Company of Men, Your Friends and Neighbors) Starring: Ren?©e Zellweger, Morgan Freeman, Chris Rock LaBute is known for his dark comedies, and Nurse Betty is no exception. What's new here, however, is a sense of humor similar to a Coen brothers movie blended with LaBute's thesis - that the human soul is empty. Zellweger plays Betty, a small-town Kansas waitress stuck in a loveless marriage to a car dealer. Her passion in life is a soap opera, A Reason to Love, and, more specifically, the hunky heart surgeon, Dr. David Ravell (Greg Kinnear). When Betty witnesses her husband's death due to a drug deal gone awry, she breaks down. Convinced that Dr. Ravell is a real person, she drives off in search of her destiny with him... in her late husband's Buick. Freeman and Rock play the team deployed to recover the heroin stashed (unbeknownst to Betty) in the trunk of the Buick, and the comedy that ensues is sure to be a hit. The Way of the Gun Director: Christopher McQuarrie Starring: Ryan Phillippe, Benicio Del Toro, James Caan, Taye Diggs, Juliette Lewis Written and directed by McQuarrie (writer of The Usual Suspects), The Way of the Gun is reminiscent of the gangster movies that followed Quentin Tarrantino's feature debut. Here, Phillippe and Del Toro play two criminals who kidnap a surrogate mother hoping for ransom from the parents of the unborn baby. However, their plans are made complicated when the man sent to deliver the ransom catches them unawares. Knowing McQuarrie's reputation and the cult-success of The Usual Suspects, expect The Way of the Gun to stimulate and surprise you. The Watcher Director: Joe Charbanic Starring: Keanu Reeves, James Spader, Marisa Tomei Thanks to the success of The Matrix, Reeves has recently had the fortune to star in many recent films, including The Replacements. In The Watcher, he plays a serial killer who lures a former FBI agent (James Spader) out of retirement, enticing him with clues about his next victims and challenging him to play cat-and-mouse. It seems that Reeves, however, will never be able to live down Speed... does anyone else sense a role-reversal here?


The Setonian
News

Central could be two-team race

The NBA Central division was won by Indiana Pacers in a landslide last year. What people forget, though, was that in the first round of the playoffs, the Pacers were ten seconds away from losing to the Milwaukee Bucks. Look for the two to fight all year for the Central crown. However, don't count out the new-look Charlotte Hornets or the upstart Toronto Raptors. Unfortunately, there are more bad teams than good in the Central, which means that fans will mostly get to watch the Atlanta Hawks, Chicago Bulls, Cleveland Cavaliers, and Detroit Pistons battle it out for the cellar spot. Take it to the bank One look at the Bulls roster will make you nostalgic for March Madness. The Chicago Bulls will likely end up at the bottom of the division, maybe the entire league, so why are they discussed first? Mainly to remind you not to forget about this team. The Bulls have a strong core of young players, plus they have a few names that will make you think back fondly to past NCAA Tournaments, like Khalid El-Amin, A.J. Guyton, and Bryce Drew. All three are question marks in the NBA, but the Bulls still have the services of co-Rookie of the Year Elton Brand (20 points per game last year), Ron Artest (12 ppg), Ron Mercer (17 ppg), and the fourth overall pick Marcus Fizer. Fearless Predictions The Bucks won't stop here. Milwaukee could run away with the division, but a few things have to happen first. They are going to have to continue to receive superb play from their trio of stars - Ray Allen, Glenn Robinson, and Sam Cassell. Next, the Hornets and the Pacers are going to have to falter, and, finally, George Karl will have to coach his butt off. Allen, who averaged 22 points per game last year, teams up with point guard Cassell, who chipped in with 18 points and nine assists per game last year in the backcourt. Robinson is good for 20 points per game as well, and these three can lead this team to the title. Clueless Who will lead the Pacers? The easy answer is Reggie Miller, as he is the star of the team. However, Indiana lost a lot of leadership in the off-season, which may make it difficult for Miller to keep a young group of players together. Dale Davis (nine years of experience), Rik Smits (12), Mark Jackson (13), and Chris Mullin (15) are no longer on the roster, and for that matter, neither is coach Larry Bird. In his place is Isiah Thomas, and in the place of these veterans, younger guys like Jalen Rose, Austin Croshere, and Travis Best will have to lead the team, not just on the floor, but off it as well. Young guns to be tested Elton Brand. The good news is that not many people expect too much from the Bulls. The bad news is, the ones that do are in Chicago. The Bulls won't win this year, but if they are going to contend in the future, it is going to be because of Elton Brand. Not only will the former Duke Blue Devil need to be a lead on the court, but he is going to have to take his fellow youngsters - Artest, Fizer, and Michael Ruffin - under his wing, a giant task for a pretty big guy. Ray Allen. It is time for Allen to shed the title of "Best player you don't know much about" and become one you know a lot about. Playing in Milwaukee, Allen doesn't get much print, which could explain why his teammates on the Olympic team were surprised at how good he was. In fact, some said he was the best player there - even better than Vince. It's not going to be enough for Allen to score his quiet 22 points per game. He needs to have a Jordan-like presence on this team. Vince Carter. America has fallen in love with this former North Carolina Tar Heel and is quick to label him the next Jordan. True, he can leap over seven-foot Frenchmen in a single bound, but what the Raptors are waiting to see is if he can lead them in the playoffs. This is going to be an interesting year for "Air Canada," as he won't be playing alongside Tracy McGrady. Last year, Carter looked flustered and lost in the playoffs, but this year, he is going to have to fight to make sure his team gets there.Old Legs to be retested Jamal Mashburn. Another guy who is tough to figure out. He was great at Kentucky, horrible with the Dallas Mavericks, and then sporadic with the Heat. Charlotte needs him to be a number one or two scoring option, which means he can't disappear from some games like he tended to in Miami. Dikembe Mutombo. The 7'2" Hawk is the only All-Star center to start in the East this year, which means it is time for him to dominate. Mutombo has always done so on defense - blocking over three shots per game and grabbing 14 rebounds a night - but now the Hawks can find out if there's any offense in this guy. This is the year to try. Honey, grab the duffel, we're moving. The big name free agents seemed to be leaving the Central more than coming in, as Eddie Jones, Grant Hill, and Tracy McGrady all took off. However, the Hornets, Pistons, and Raptors hope they got equal value for their former stars. Charlotte received Mashburn, P.J. Brown, and Otis Thorpe, while the Pistons got Chucky Atkins and Ben Wallace from the Magic, plus they signed Billy Owens and Cedric Ceballos. The Raptors lost Doug Christie and Dee Brown in addition to McGrady but picked up Corliss Williamson and Mark Jackson. In other cities, Milwaukee signed Lindsey Hunter, Indiana got Jermaine O'Neal, and Cleveland signed Robert Traylor, J.R. Reid, Clarence Weatherspoon, and Chris Gatling, but parted with Shawn Kemp, Danny Ferry, and Bobby Sura.


The Setonian
News

TCUJ decision damages homosexual community

To the Editor: The removal of the ban on the Tufts Christian Fellowship by the Tufts Community Union Judiciary is a decision which exemplifies the University's inability to be an authoritative and effective presence on this campus. What the issue boils down to is whether the decision made by the TCF, to not allow a homosexual to fill a leadership position, was an extension of the their rights guaranteed under the First Amendment or rather a breach of the Tufts Anti-Discrimination Policy. According to the TCUJ, the TCF's actions were part of their religious beliefs and not rooted in the form of a discriminatory act. Is that then to say that all beliefs expressed to the public, in the form of speech, are to be fair game? No. The freedoms granted under the Constitution are not absolute, which is echoed throughout many Supreme Court cases over the course of the past century. The reasoning for such dilution to this right is that such expressions can create imminent "clear and present" dangers. In the case of Schenck v. United States (1919), it was the unanimous decision of the court that found that Charles Schenck's distribution of pamphlets, which opposed the United States' entry into WWI and promoted an end to the draft, not to be protected under the First Amendment. The rationale behind the decision stood that such a leaflet threaten the emergence of a clear and present danger which could subsequently create substantive evils during this time of war. The TCUJ's decision, similarly, creates a situation on campus which stunts the acceptance and the prospering of the homosexual community, creating such substantive evils. Such beliefs that downplay the equality of anyone on the Tufts campus, draws about an ignorance amongst all students alike. Social acceptance deteriorates and only encourages a mind-set which leads to more discrimination, hate, and violence. It is sad to see a University who parades around over the fact that they are so "diverse" when in fact they ignore blatant breaches of their own Anti-Discrimination Policy, the grounding for much of the schools claimed diversity. As it is positive to see the amount of views represented throughout the Tufts campus, it is unacceptable for those views to affect the status of one person over another. The TCUJ has proved themselves ineffective in enforcing written policy which will in effect, hurt such groups as the LGBTCT drastically, and leave loopholes for further controversy to come.Jesse Goldberg, LA '04


The Setonian
News

Cliquing across color lines

When Alex Mason first ran into Phil Keitel during fraternity rush, he thought the loudmouthed, aggressive Keitel was a big jerk. As seniors four years later, Mason and Keitel share a house, a tight group of friends, an extensive collection of inside jokes, leadership of a non-profit organization, and a bond that few have with another person. Keitel is white. He describes himself as a "straight-up Caucasian." Mason, whose mother is white and father is black, is aware that he is seen "strictly as black." And because of this contrast, their friendship is a novelty at Tufts. "I really like that we're the exception at Tufts," Keitel said. These two don't have any overwrought stories about hurdling barriers to become friends - instead, they crack jokes about their uniqueness. They can even point to one other pair of friends on campus - two junior males, one black, one white - as "little Alex and Phil," since they too are an exception to a pattern most students take for granted. They know they stick out, and in this school, in this country, they can also point out a few reasons why. For Keitel and Mason, race is not an issue that falls under the auspices of political correctness. They joke, often in a raunchy way, about their backgrounds, cultures, and upbringings - lifestyles that, in some respects, can be viewed from opposite ends of the spectrum. "We had a lot of common interests, but in actuality, we still have essentially different personalities," Keitel began. "Which are a result of different backgrounds," Mason chimed in, finishing the thought. They tend to do that a lot - finish each other sentences, complete each other's thoughts - as best friends often do. Although Keitel and Mason see their friends, mostly other males from the class of 2001, as a diverse group in terms of black and white, their friendship is still prominent. "We would be the closest set of two. We're kind of inseparable," Keitel said. Although they're alike in many ways, they don't quite share a brain. Girls are a point of contention. The oversized poster of a bikini clad blonde in the living room shows Keitel's preference, which is completely different from Mason's - and he'll just leave it at that. Another difference: White, upper-class suburbia surrounded young Keitel. Mason grew up in a diverse Philly neighborhood. And their opinions on race don't quite mesh all the time. The uniqueness lies here. At a school where certain tables at Dewick are referred to as the "black hole" because of the race their occupants; where the Greek system is overwhelmingly white; and where some students feel they can't relate to students of other races, their brotherhood is almost an anomaly. Race can make or break friendships in this way. The color line is the barrier. "I think people avoid friendships [with people of different races] because they're afraid of what their other friends will think of them," Mason said. With these two, it's a matter of comfort. "It really does come down to the fact that we don't really care where we are from," Keitel said. "Race was never a factor - we just didn't really think about it."Building bonds When many students of certain racial or ethnic backgrounds first arrive at Tufts, they're not even freshmen yet. Many come as pre-frosh to April's Students of Color Outreach Program (SCOPE) weekend for accepted applicants. Friendships form here, and are later solidified during orientation, when the African-American, Asian-American, and Latino Centers take trips to introduce new students to other freshmen students of color. "For black people on campus, the first people they really get to chill with are black students [on the orientation trip]. You come in and meet everyone, and you just naturally stay friends," Mason said.During the African-American Center's trip to Cape Cod, Mason met the guys he would later join to form "Coco Tufts" (CT), a collection of 16 or 17 black men in the class of 2001. Together they made a pact not to drift apart, a seemingly legitimate concern in light of past occurrences. "We were beginning to see how black men on campus didn't stay together as the years went by. There would be disassociation within the black male community and we didn't want that to happen," Mason explained, adding that through the years, "it has worked very nicely." Mason, though, had never considered race when forming relationships. "Race hasn't ever been an issue with me, and I've caught sh-t from the black community for it all my life. In high school, people asked me if I thought I was white," he said. Others see a similar racial background as grounds for possible friendship. Relaxing at Capen House, their home for the year, sophomores Gennifer Miller and Joan Williams, both African-American, recall meeting each other during SCOPE weekend. Although their first impressions weren't so great - Williams laughs now, remembering Miller as "snobby" - they both found acceptance and understanding from other black students as freshmen. "It was easier to be friends with black people - it was those people who opened up to me first," Miller said, relating this to bigger issues. "African-Americans, because of their history of enslavement, go through an America that is different from other people's. No matter how many times people can say they identify with what we go through, they can't understand. Black people can understand." On the other hand, when Mason comes home pissed off because a bouncer wouldn't let him in a club on the basis of his skin color, Keitel automatically has his back, urging him to call a lawyer, to write The Boston Globe, to do something - because he knows it's wrong too. "I don't think it's really color that makes people understand you more, it's also just a matter of where you're coming from as an individual," Mason said. Indeed, a common color isn't always a sure way to form tight friendships. Miller remembers a high school life where other black students ridiculed and made fun of her because they grew up in different types of neighborhoods. Similarly, sophomore Jillian Beirne, also African-American, remembers negative experiences with black students during high school. During freshman year of college, Beirne recalls, "I was an 'incog' - I didn't have any black friends in high school, so I thought the black people here would hate me. I was gonna be friends with anyone I saw." She made friends with another black freshman, who then brought Beirne to meet all of her friends. "I never had more fun than the first night," she said, although building these new friendships came with some insecurity. "When I started meeting the rest of the group, I was really uncomfortable at first. Besides my family, I'd never been around black people." The difference between her experiences in high school and at Tufts is that here they built, as Beirne puts it, a "100 percent support network," among black students. "I found a community of black people who were all on the same level - who were taking classes, making inroads," Williams said in agreement. And although their group is predominantly black, the girls acknowledge that there's always room for others. "Anybody can be introduced into our group," Miller said. Down the street and around the corner on Latin Way, Asian-American students at the Start House express similar sentiments about friendship building. Junior David Jen also found few friendships with other Asians during his high school career. "I never hung out with Asians before I came to Tufts," Jen said. But he also finds that who he hangs out with isn't a consideration. "I just had friends who knew friends who happened to be Asian."Jen's high school class had 81students, two of whom were Asian, including himself. Now that Jen is integrated into an Asian community at Tufts, however, he feels more of a connection with his culture. "I always felt weird because my customs weren't the same and I felt like an outsider. I feel more comfortable with Asian people as a result. It's nice to have someone who shares your customs," he said. Although junior Kristen Kawachi now embraces the Start House as her home away from home, the transition was not so easy. In fact, Kawachi came to Tufts with a mindset similar to Beirne's. "I had a lot of negative feelings toward the Asian-American Center and the concept of having peer leaders," she said. Similarly, when sophomore Caroline Park applied to live in the Start House, she expressed some reservations to the center's leader - she didn't understand why Asian-American students seemed to stick together. Park got a response that still resonates for her: Why aren't these same criticisms voiced when a group of white people sits together in the dining hall? "Nobody accused anyone of having a white table at Dewick. They don't have [designated] tables or houses because they do have it - every dorm can be a white dorm," Kawachi said. Freshman Pete Schaefer hasn't accused anybody of this. Schaefer, who doesn't like to identify his race, but realizes that others see him as white, says that he notices when groups of solely Asian or black students walk around campus together. However, when it comes to white students walking around in groups, it's just not so obvious. Shaking his head, Schaefer admits that he doesn't know why he doesn't notice as much. He really couldn't say why.Sticking together There have been incidents that Mason and Keitel just laugh about now. There was that bar where Mason took Keitel, where Keitel stood out completely, sitting on the receiving end of harsh glares from black men. Then there's the ski resort where Keitel took Mason, where Mason was the only black vacationer, and where he was surprised to hear hip-hop music bouncing off the white snowcaps. They admit it - their experiences, their cultures, and their skin colors have primed and equipped them to encounter very different situations in life. For that reason, they continue to go through it all together. "I think we feel really comfortable being able to do all the stuff we do and see a lot of the different environments there are. We've put each other in the funniest places," Keitel said. Some of Keitel's experiences have come with being integrated into "Coco Tufts," because of his friendship with Mason. There, Keitel is the exception: eating meals in the dining hall, rolling a dozen deep to a club, going to parties, and just kicking back in a group of guys where Keitel is often the only white male, has given him a new perspective on racial interactions at Tufts. "I didn't really think about it. I sort of ended up getting along really well with the black kids instead of the white kids. It wasn't because of their color, [instead it was] their demeanor and the way I could chill with them," Keitel said. And so it happened that, instead of black students cocking an eyebrow when Keitel plopped down at their table in Dewick, white students questioned it instead. "It was white people who were like 'huh?'" Keitel said, donning a confused expression while imitating his white questioners. "Some [white] frat brothers would say, 'You think you're black.' When black people say it, I know they're kidding, but when white people say it, I know they're serious." This tendency to assign such distinctions - and to expect people to stick to them - has to do with human nature, according to Gennifer Miller. "This society is very concerned with categorizing people. People in general find their groups and it becomes us or them. It's human nature to categorize people and to align with them," she said. This could be one reason why white frat boys, as Keitel refers to them, seem to feel threatened by his close friendship with black students - something they don't have, for one reason or another. As Miller, Williams, and Beirne acknowledge, it may be that some white students don't feel comfortable sitting at a table full of black students during dinner. At the same time, they feel that many don't realize that blacks are equally uncomfortable at a table full of white students. "You get sick of being the token black person if you're out with a group of white people. [With black friends], there's already a certain level of things that you can talk about, that you don't have to explain. It's so much more convenient and it's less awkward," Beirne said, the other girls agreeing. Around each other, they don't have to explain how they take care of their hair, they don't have to be representative of every other black girl - they can just be. They also echo other students' sentiments that because they are black, they are more visible. Latino students, on the other hand, feel that they are less visible as a group and instead, tend to classify their connection as a cultural one. "A lot of times, you don't know who Latinos are; they tend to mix in. Black people stand out, Asian people stand out. Latino people don't stand out," sophomore Cecelia Almazan said. Almazan and some other leaders of Association of Latin American Students (ALAS) don't feel that the majority of their friends are Latino, but that their friendships with other Latinos are based on having a similar culture and heritage. "I didn't know that much about my own culture or much about Latino heritage. I wanted to learn more about it," sophomore Melissa Rosario said. Being active in the Latino community, senior Carlos Lenz finds that he has to balance sets of friends. Some nights he finds himself going to two very different parties, consisting of groups of people that he knows aren't really aware of each other. "You know both sides, you see both sides of situation, but the two sides don't really come together or bridge that gap, because of culture or language," he said, referring to his Latino friends and his buddies on the sailing team. Junior Angel Vail also has the precarious task of balancing friends from La Casa, her sorority, the Rainbow House, and various theatre productions. "My freshman year I'd see people stay with the same types and I used to get upset. I'm very idealistic, and I want everybody to get along, but that won't happen," she said. "People want to stay with people who are like them."Dissing or missing out? Looking at the sheer numbers, Tufts seems to be a fairly diverse place in terms of racial and ethnic groups. Although Keitel feels Tufts has a "pretty good mix," Mason has a different take on the subject. "Tufts definitely is not diverse enough. It is more than most [schools], but for all the praise the University gives itself, there's a lot to go," he said. But both guys adamantly agree that students segregate themselves by racial and ethnic groups. Mason breaks it down like this: "What happens is you have one group [of friends] that are majority white with one black person, one Asian person, and one Indian person." "A lot of the black people center around [Capen] house, and all the white kids stick to frats," Keitel added. "I think the Indians pretty much stick to the Indians, and among the Asians, they're definitely broken down [into countries of origin]." Kawachi doesn't feel that her friendships are based on race, but she finds strength within the Asian community, which she uses to deal with people of other races. When she first came to Tufts, from being the majority in her Hawaiian hometown, she found herself uneasy in situations where she was the minority, partly because she wasn't settled into her own ethnic group. "I was uncomfortable in my own race or ethnicity, which is something I never questioned before. I found this community... to be more comfortable with my own race, which is an integral part of who I am," she said. Now, after "finding strength" in her community, she feels confident to speak out when she is the only Asian in a room. However, some students on campus feel that friendships are built upon interests, and not race. Freshman Peter Markus, a white student who says that he has a diverse group of friends, doesn't really see racial or ethnic cliques. "People hang out with people with similar interests and hobbies. You can't be friends with everyone. If some people feel the need to remove themselves, then they're missing out on friends," he said. Schaefer adds to Markus' thoughts. "If [someone] has met a lot of different people and then say this is who I want to hang out with [in terms of race], there's nothing wrong with that. It's different if it's based solely on race," he said. Sometimes, it may be a little weird to see how things have changed for Beirne and Miller. They really don't keep in touch with all the white friends they kept through high school. "It's just really different," Beirne said. "If it comes down to it, it's really good that we're so comfortable and there's security. At the same time, it's naturally going to constrict you in some ways," Miller said. However, Williams added that "each one of us has different friends outside the group." But what if Williams decided to go out with some white or Asian girls on a Friday night, instead of with the group? Well, there might be a ruckus, but perhaps the same would happen in any tight group of friends. "I think by nature it's limited, but I've been to all-white schools and I've had all-white friends - I just see that being in the group that I am in, it's hard to reach out to people as I do with my black friends," Miller said. "But that's the choice I made. That comes with any group - frats, sororities, any sort of organization. Part of being in a group is perhaps sacrificing the opportunity to be with other people," she continued. Despite what's been said and done, Mason and Keitel formed their friendship beyond the black and white distinction. They've lived together for three years and they also came together to form the Westman's Association, a non-profit group which gives money to different charities such as Special Friends. They have plans to go into business together after they graduate, a venture that may place race, something they take lightly now, between them. "I don't expect race relations to change that much in five to ten years... it's definitely a possibility that [Keitel] would have to become a frontrunner," Mason said, attributing this to his race. "It's actually really unfortunate that a fate of a business would have to rest on something - " "As stupid as that," Keitel interjected. "Exactly - as race," Mason said. "But, that's where we are right now as a country," Mason concluded. For right now, these two guys can just chill. They're still in college living in a cluttered house where they can comfortably quote Chris Rock and rip on each other. For now, skin color is pushed to the side. "Skin color plays into who people perceive as their absolute and real friends, who we all talk about as our best friends. Very few people have those that are outside their own race, that just happens to be who they confide in and trust," Mason said, glancing at Keitel, who, as always, nods in sync.


The Setonian
News

Bush, Gore face off in intense, issue-specific debate

UMASS-BOSTON - Vice President Al Gore and Texas Governor George W. Bush squared off last night in the first of three presidential debates, each disputing specific policy issues while sticking to the main themes of their campaigns. In their first meeting of the campaign, both candidates seemed to bicker more than discuss, frequently interrupting one another and violating the agreed-upon one minute limit for rebuttals. With election day only a month away and the two candidates in a dead heat, Bush and Gore sought to present a firm grasp of the issues and a dynamic, experienced leadership style. A host of politicos shared their reactions after the debate, some touting Gore's agenda and others favoring Bush, but no decisive winner could be named. "George Bush couldn't get his facts right," said New Hampshire Governor Jeanne Shaheen last night. "He just didn't seem to understand the situation in Serbia." New York Governor George Pataki found similar faults in Gore's debating tactics. "Al Gore was grossly misrepresenting the governor's proposals," he said, calling Bush "a person of character and commitment." The two men hit upon a wide range of issues and disagreed on almost everything, each citing his own statistics, numbers, and examples - many that involved families from swing states such as Florida. While Governor Bush promised to give the projected $25 trillion federal budget surplus back to the American people and to cut government bureaucracy, the vice president vowed to fight "powerful interests" and use more targeted, middle class tax cuts to "keep the prosperity going." Governor Bush appeared relaxed, smiling and joking freely, while his opponent was less affable, and often gave rambling answers that drifted away from the moderator's question. Bush, playing upon his role as an outsider, called himself a "different kind of leader," and continually attacked what he called the "fuzzy" math used by the Gore camp. "I am not of Washington. I'm from Texas," he said. "I'm beginning to think that not only did [Vice President Gore] invent the Internet, but he invented the calculator." Poking fun at the vice president's liberal use of statistics and examples, Bush repeatedly accused the current administration of "squandering" the budget surplus and promised to "empower Americans to make decisions for themselves on their own lives." The debate held special significance for Governor Bush, who needed to prove to voters that he has a solid grasp on important issues. He worked hard last night to present a strong, decisive front to the vice president's more intense debating style. "He just has to show that he's in the same caliber as Gore," said Chicago Sun-Times columnist Bob Novak before the debate. "And he can do that." Gore displayed his usual familiarity with specific policies and complicated issues. He took every opportunity to discuss the recurring themes of his campaign: balancing the budget, paying down the debt, shoring up social security, giving tax breaks to the middle class, and reforming education. The vice president repeatedly cited statistics in efforts to show that Bush's tax cut plan would primarily benefit the rich. Gore is a practiced debater, and scored the symbolic last word on several key questions. The next president's ability to appoint at least three Supreme Court justices makes the outcome of this year's election especially pertinent. Bush warned the millions of American T.V. viewers that his opponent would appoint "liberal, activist judges," and promised instead to stick to "strict constructionist" justices. Gore vowed to appoint more moderate, pro-choice judges, calling the US constitution "a document that lives and grows with our country." The discussion over the future of the Supreme Court segued into a debate on abortion, as the composure of the body will have an effect on abortion-rights cases brought before the Court. Governor Bush vowed that, if elected, he would not work to overturn the FDA's recent approval of the abortion drug RU-486. He added that he would fight to "reduce the number of abortions in this country" and prohibit controversial partial-birth abortions. The vice president fortified his pro-choice stance, expressed support for "a woman's right to choose," and stood unequivocally behind the new drug. On the foreign policy front, neither candidate advocated the use of the US military to forcibly remove Serbian President Slobodan Milosevic from power. The vice president, calling Milosevic a war criminal, said that he unequivocally lost the Serbian presidential election and suggested taking "measured steps" to remove him from office. Governor Bush, on the other hand, advocated using a "strong diplomatic hand" to continue pressuring the Serbian leader to resign. He also called upon Russian President Vladimir Putin to use his "sway" to influence Milosevic. In the college-capital of the world, education was a hot topic at the debate. Governor Bush pushed for more local control and annual, standardized tests to gauge the progress of both students and their school systems. Gore also advocated education reform, but opted instead for higher teacher salaries, smaller classes, and tax deductions for college tuition.