Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

'Hitchiker's' makes for a long and fun trip

Die-hard fans around the world would recognize it on sight. It is the top-selling book in the galaxy, surpassing even the Galactic Encyclopedia, mainly because it has the words "DON'T PANIC" reassuringly embossed on its cover. But don't mistake "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" for a simple book. The story, written by Douglas Adams, first appeared as a BBC radio series in 1978. Its immediate surge in popularity paved the way for it to be reworked as a book, a BBC television series, and a subsequent franchise of novels that took its heroes to the end of the universe and beyond, quite literally. When Adams died in 2001, he was working on tweaking the ever-evolving "Hitchhiker's" mythos into something suitable for the big screen. The subsequent movie version of the '70s sci-fi classic premiered Friday amid the great expectations of salivating fans everywhere. The movie follows the story of Arthur Dent (Martin Freeman), a mundane everyman who is only extraordinary in that he lacks any distinguishing qualities. When the Earth is destroyed to make way for an interstellar bypass, Arthur is dragged halfway across the galaxy by hitchhiking alien Ford Prefect (Mos Def), and is thrown into an adventure with a depressed robot, a super-genius computer and the real architects of the universe faster than he can say, "Thanks for all the fish." The result is a Monty Python-esque romp through the galaxy as Arthur and company search for the meaning of life, the universe and everything else. Though they find the answer relatively easily, the search for the question proves much more difficult, and provides a backdrop for their jaunts to distant planets and a few run-ins with the evil galactic equivalent of middle management. Among all the two-headed aliens and interstellar space travel of "The Hitchhiker's Guide," the guide itself is perhaps the most difficult aspect to bring to life on the big screen. Arthur and Ford consult it on numerous occasions as they encounter unknown dangers, and it would have been easy for the production team to let it become the dominant focus of the story. But instead, the Guide is kept mostly in the background, and is only brought forward to explain jokes that would otherwise have flown over heads of much of the audience. The result is a much more coherent story, which abandons the constant flip-flops of the 1981 BBC television version for less spastic visuals. Though it would be far too easy for the characters of "Hitchhiker's" to become a backdrop for Adams' gags, the strong cast keeps the story afloat. Freeman is satisfyingly spineless as Arthur, and Mos Def portrays a surprisingly human Ford, who is just strange enough to keep straight man Arthur jumping. It is their co-stars, however, that really steal the show. Alan Rickman, recently of "Harry Potter" fame, provides the voice of Marvin the Paranoid Android, a robot whose severe depression would have shrinks raking in the dough for years, and Sam Rockwell ("Matchstick Men") portrays Zaphod Beeblebrox, the two-headed but brainless president of the galaxy. One of the biggest problems with updating "Hitchhiker's" for 2005 is that most of the jokes are no longer relevant. The constant highway bypasses, the original political commentary, and even Ford Prefect's name date the story to the late 1970s when the original radio series and book versions were first created. But Adams, who is credited for the screenplay along with co-writer Karey Kirkpatrick, addressed the issue himself by updating the humor for the 21st century. The character of Zaphod Beeblebrox was clearly reworked for the movie, and Rockwell's mannerisms obviously mimic those of current U.S. president George W. Bush, twangy Texan drawl and all. Rockwell's performance brings necessary satire of current events to the decades-old story. Without it, "The Hitchhiker's Guide" becomes little more than a travel guide through a series of humorous sketches. But the updated writing and the new jokes - among them, the leader of a cult-like religious movement who longs for Armageddon - make the story relevant to the modern day. The result is a science fiction romp worthy of the franchise name. Though the movie includes additions that might make long-time fans cringe, such as an added emphasis on a love story between Freeman's Arthur and a fellow Earth refugee played by Zooey Deschanel, it still captures the spirit of the original "Hitchhiker's Guide." Douglas Adams may have hitchhiked off this planet years ago, but the final addition to his legacy is sure to leave the rest of us in stitches.


The Setonian
News

AACT frustrated with hiring of professors

Although the Asian American Curriculum Transformation (AACT) has been lobbying for the inclusion of an Asian American Studies Program at Tufts since 2001, they have recently turned up the heat on campus by both meeting with University Provost Jhamed Bharucha and staging a protest last Wednesday. "Asian American history completes a picture of American history. Without that picture, Tufts students would have a false and incomplete idea of American history," senior Wen Cai said. Six AACT representatives and several faculty members from the Oversight Panel on Race met with Bharucha, Dean of Arts and Sciences Susan Ernst, and Dean of Academic Affairs Kevin Dunn. The students demanded that the administration commit to hiring both one tenure-track and one junior professor who taught in the field of Asian American studies. Bharucha said that the meeting "clearly showed the depth of commitment by all parties" towards advancing Asian American studies at Tufts. According to Cai, Bharucha said he was willing to discuss issues of race and identity at Tufts, but that "he rejected our demands of taking action now to finally move forward on an eight-year-old proposal." Following the meeting, around 40 students protested in front of Ballou Hall and marched through campus, bearing signs urging the University to include Asian American Studies as part of the curriculum. In 1997, the Task Force on Race recommended that the lack of Asian American, Latino, and Native American Studies in the curriculum be addressed. They set the years of 1999-2002 as "focus years" for developing an Asian American Studies curriculum. History Professor and member of the Task Force on Race Steven Marrone said that disciplines such as Asian American and Latino studies are "of both general intellectual importance and of importance to the segments of the population they study, because they help people from these groups to get a real sense of their history." According to Marrone, the Task Force's job is to encourage the University to implement such disciplines, but "to my great sorrow, we have not moved forward." Students emphasized the lack of progression. "We've been trying for five years and nothing has happened," Cai said. "Eight years ago, Tufts itself recognized the need [for Asian-American Studies], and nothing has happened." Bharucha said he disagreed, and that the University "took an important step forward" this year by permitting classes dealing with Asian American and Latino subjects to count toward the Culture Option of the Foreign Language requirement. He also said that the "American studies major offers a concentration in Asian American studies" and that departments such as child development, English, and history include a good deal of Asian American subject matter. According to Bharucha, in the last three years, Tufts has hired 13 additional full-time Asian or Asian American faculty in Arts, Sciences, and Engineering. "Through their experience and knowledge, they serve as educators, role models, and mentors for all of our students," he said. The members of AACT, however, said that such an assertion misses the point. "We were particularly upset because the Provost kept blurring the line between Asian and Asian American," sophomore and AACT member Ivy Cheng said of the meeting. In Spring 2002, the administration approved a joint proposition between the American Studies Program and the English Department to hire a tenure-track professor specializing in Asian American Literature. American Studies Program Director and biology professor Francine Chew said that "the candidate we all agreed upon got hired out from under us." After that, the program and department were unable to agree on another candidate, and the search never came to fruition. During the Spring 2004 semester, the history department and American studies program submitted a joint proposal to hire an Asian American professor. The administration rejected this proposal, but according to Marrone it was not "finally rejected," meaning the proposal can be resubmitted. The proposal was intended to be resubmitted this spring, but that has not yet happened. Professor Anne Gardulski of Geology, a member of the Oversight Panel on Race, said that AACT students have been meeting with such departments as political science and English to see what can be done. "AACT has played nice and tried hard in good faith to work with the administration," she said. "And it hasn't gotten us anywhere." "Tufts has talked the talk for the past eight years but still to this day refuses to walk the walk," Gardulski said. Chew said that the lack of Asian American studies is a particular problem at a school where Asian Americans make up the largest non-white demographic (13 percent). "It reproduces the pervasive 'mainstream' view that Asian Americans are invisible and can be valued for their labor but not treated as full citizens," she said. "Above all, our Asian American students enrich our community through the experiences they bring to Tufts," Bharucha said. Gardulski said that the Asian American Studies discipline is very interdisciplinary, and requires a lot of cooperation among different departments and the administration. "I guess I'm too much of an eternal optimist, but I believe that this will eventually come to pass," she said.


The Setonian
News

Lights on the Hill

(Jeff Chen/Tufts Daily) The Tuftstonia Day Fireworks Spectacular was held Friday evening on the Res Quad. The fireworks display was in celebration of Tufts' 153rd birthday. In addition to the fireworks display, free giveaways, wax hands, photo buttons, a dunk-tank, music and a free barbeque were part of the festivities. The event was sponsored by the Tufts University Spirit Coalition (TUSC) and Entertainment Board. Click on the photo to enlarge.


The Setonian
News

Professors and administrators discuss minority rates, retention in the sciences

About 30 Tufts students and faculty met last Tuesday in the Rabb Room for an hour-long panel discussion entitled "Women and Students of Color in Science." University Provost Jamshed Bharucha, who teaches in the Psychology Department, discussed why stereotypes about these groups exist. "Stereotypes are quick and easy frameworks for understanding groups of people," he said. "It takes knowledge, research, and work to counteract them," Bharucha said. He said that there is progress in the growing fields of social psychology and social cognition working to identify causes of stereotypes and ways to reverse them. The three female and two male panelists discussed issues surrounding women and minorities in the science. In many ways, Tufts is doing well with underrepresented groups in the sciences. According to panelist Linda Abriola, Dean of the School of Engineering, about 30 percent of Tufts engineering students are female, twice the national average. Another panelist, Naomi Rosenberg, Dean of the Sackler School of Biomedical Sciences, said that 62 percent of Sackler students are women. According to statistics, Tufts has also been successful retaining women as a whole. Tufts's overall six-year graduation rate for females in 2003 was 91.7 percent, while that of men was 88.9 percent. The University's overall graduation rate in 2003 was 90.3 percent. The picture for minority students is not as encouraging, however. The graduation rate for white students was 91.9 percent. Except for Asian students, who had a 94 percent graduation rate, the rates for African American, Latino, and other minority students were all below 80 percent. While institutions pay attention to graduation rates, their picture of student decisions to remain enrolled are hardly clear-cut. "There could be a lot of things behind these rates," Margery Davies, the Director of Diversity Education and Development for the School of Arts and Sciences, said. "To be really able to understand them, you need to tease out what factors cause students to stay or leave," she said. In many instances, women and minorities, which institutions refer to as "underrepresented groups," often face an uphill battle for respect and often face unequal treatment. "We are kidding ourselves if we think this is not happening at Tufts," Dean of Arts and Sciences Susan Ernst said. The panelists said they agreed that increased percentages of faculty and students from underrepresented groups can increase the diversity of the departments in the sciences. "We can make sure there are faculty of color and women. Graduate students can also serve as role models," Ernst said. Poor faculty retention of female and minority faculty at Tufts has been an evolving problem, as demonstrated by the Kaleidoscope Report, a survey released in 2004. Women and minority retention rates in faculty were lower than 50 percent across the board. The loss of female faculty was particularly "severe" in the School of Engineering, according to the report. In the 2004 Report, Asian American women held a retention rate of 50 percent; Hispanic women, 50 percent; Caucasian women, 42 percent; Asian American men, 40 percent; African American men, 40 percent; and Hispanic men, 25 percent. While increased numbers of female and minority faculty do not guarantee improved treatment of underrepresented groups, administrators hope that it is generally that successful faculty and graduate students will increase confidence in students from underrepresented groups. "There is something to be said for people who have had similar experiences," Davies said. Greater percentages of women and minorities in the sciences can help genuine acceptance. "Having more women in science will make the male majority stop looking at them as a kind of rare species and accept them as colleagues in the long run," Dr. Gabriella Sciola, one of four female faculty in the physics department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said. Tufts' Diversity Office offers workshops for faculty to discuss issues of teaching a diverse student population, as well as opportunities for departments to have meetings between faculty and students. A number of Tufts Programs also provide peer-tutoring and support and additional opportunities to explore topics in science and engineering for underrepresented groups. The Computer Science, Engineering and Math Scholarships Program, the First Year Scholars Program, and the Health Careers Opportunities Program are a few of these. Davies said that it is still too early to comment on and measure the success of these programs. The experts agreed that improving equality issues in science is complex. "Changes will have to come from both sides. Women and other minorities should have more faith in themselves, and pursue science careers if science is what they love," Sciola said.


The Setonian
News

Baseball | Team heads for playoffs after sweeping Mules

The Tufts baseball team entered this weekend's series against NESCAC East opponent Colby with a spot in the NESCAC Tournament at stake. Colby entered the series with a slightly different goal - winning its first game of the season. Overmatched by the Jumbos, the Mules were unable to add a win to their record, instead recording three more losses as Tufts secured its berth in the playoffs with 10-6, 22-0, and 10-8 wins. Despite what the final results may indicate, the Jumbos did not breeze by the Mules. "I think we had in our heads that we might be cruising through the weekend and that wasn't the case," senior captain Bob Kenny said. "We went out Friday and came out kind of flat, but still got the win. Saturday we knew we had to come out early and put them away, and we did in the first game. In the third game, they jumped [out to an early lead] but we fought hard and got the win in the ninth." In the third and final game of the series, Colby (0-26, 0-11 in NESCAC) had a chance to pull off a win and prevent the Jumbos (20-8, 9-2 in NESCAC) from sweeping. Heading into the ninth inning with a tight 8-7 lead, the Mules were only three outs away from their first victory of the season. However, two walks, two batters hit by pitches, and an error cost Colby three unearned runs in a hitless ninth inning for the Jumbos as Tufts walked away with the 10-8 win. Colby's Tyler Hales had three hits, including a home run and a triple, and Andy Carr and Steve Sandak had two hits apiece, but their offensive contributions were not enough to prevent a Jumbo comeback. Junior Zak Smotherman started the game for the Jumbos, but it was sophomore Aaron Narva who earned the win, moving to a perfect 3-0. Sophomore second baseman Brian Casey led the Jumbos offensively with two hits and three runs. "We tried to stay up and we kind of played down to their level of baseball," Kenny said. "The goal of the weekend was to not do that, so we have some things to work on." "We played well enough to beat this team, but it wasn't good enough to win the NESCAC Tournament," freshman Adam Telian added. "But we'll be fine as long as we keep hitting the ball and pitching as well as we are." In the first game of the doubleheader on Saturday, two explosive innings propelled the Jumbos to a blowout 22-0 victory over the Mules. Tufts scored seven runs in the first inning and tacked on another 12 in the seventh for good measure. Junior Jim O'Leary and sophomore Kyle Backstrom each had home runs, and junior shortstop Greg Chertok led the Jumbos with four hits and three runs. The series opened on Friday night with a berth in the NESCAC Tournament at stake, and the Jumbos did not disappoint in a 10-6 win. With the win, and Bates' 14-inning 3-1 loss to Bowdoin on Friday, Tufts secured a playoff spot. Senior starter Ben Simon went 4.1 innings, allowing two runs on six hits and striking out one. Simon was relieved by Telian, who earned the win, pitching three innings and allowing one earned run. "I didn't even realize I got the win until the next day," Telian said. "After I found out, I was pretty pumped that I got the win that sent us into the playoffs." Narva came in the game for Telian, breaking the Tufts school record with his 17th pitching appearance of the season. Junior Jeremy Davis got the final out of the game to earn his first save of the season. Sophomore first baseman Bryan McDavitt had three hits for the Jumbos. Kenny had two hits and three RBIs, and Backstrom had two hits and batted in two. O'Leary homered, racking up another three RBIs. In the third game of the series, Colby took an early lead in the first inning when Hales tripled and sophomore Andy Carr hit a sacrifice fly to score two. The Jumbos trailed until the fourth inning, when a two-run single by Kenny tied the game. Tufts added four more in the fifth inning and O'Leary's homer in the eighth inning widened the gap, before the Mules cut it to 7-4 in the eighth. Tufts scored three more in the ninth on a two-run double from O'Leary and an RBI double from Kenny to make it 10-4 and Colby was only able to get two in the bottom of the inning. The Mules had the bases loaded and the tying run at the plate when Davis took the mound and recorded the final out. The Jumbos will play non-league opponent Eastern Connecticut at home on Tuesday before heading to Bates on Thursday to play their last NESCAC East game of the regular season. "[Our goal is to] just to win and get momentum going into the NESCAC tournament," Kenny said. "We have four games and we want to keep the winning streak going and get ready for the playoffs."


The Setonian
News

Renovations are in their second phase at Fletcher

Fletcher's Ginn Library and Mugar Hall will undergo large-scale renovations this summer, with the intended results of easier access to the Ginn Library and better group study space. "We haven't done a whole lot with facilities in the past 10 to 15 years," Jay Herlihy, Director of Administration and Finance at the Fletcher School, said. Plans are set to relocate the Ginn Library entrance, circulation, and reference desks. "The new library entrance will be moved from the basement of Cabot to Mugar Hall at a courtyard that will be on the sidewalk that runs parallel to Professors Row," Ken Varnum, the Associate Librarian at Ginn Library, said. Above the courtyard entrance, at the second level of Mugar Hall, a horseshoe-shaped classroom will be built with capacity for 50 to 60 students. These changes to the structure of Mugar Hall flooring will affect how members of the Tufts and Fletcher community can access the building. "This conversion, along with a new security system, allows elevator access from the first to seventh floors," Herlihy said. Currently, the elevator only has access from the second to seventh floors. According to Herlihy, this change is meant to "set up the community for better access [in the Fletcher school]." These changes are a part of a continual master plan - last year, renovation occurred on the fourth, sixth, and seventh floors of Cabot, as well as a facelift in the Hall of Flags and reception area. The current renovations are expected to be complete by Aug. 15, while those on the exterior will take place throughout the Fall 2005 semester. Herlihy said that "the continuing exterior work in the fall shouldn't affect students and their studying." The Mugar Computer Lab entrance has also been re-routed, so that the only entrance is through the back entrance by the No Name Caf?©. The lab itself will be completely closed this summer. "It was an annoyance getting into the computer lab after 7:00 p.m., once the Caf?© was closed," second-year Fletcher student Rali Gueorguieva said. According to Ken Varnum, the Associate Librarian at Ginn, "the computer lab itself will not be touched, only the hallway outside of it will be redone.... It's for that reason that the computer lab will be closed this summer." Work that will be done inside the computer lab this summer will include redecoration and restoration of the floors and ceilings. Other interior renovations will include a reconfiguration of library office space, remodeling in the reading rooms, and a construction of compact shelving. Herlihy also said that other exterior reconstructions will include "completely redoing the skin of Cabot," including the replacement of every window.



The Setonian
News

Viewpoint | The liberal view

While reading last Thursday's issue of the Daily, I came to a shocking realization. How is it possible that a campus with a primarily liberal student body cannot manage to have a functioning liberal journal? Conservative students are acknowledged as the minority on campus, often claiming that their beliefs are not given credence, yet there exists a clear, readily available journal dedicated to airing the conservative idea. There is no equivalent liberal publication. Supposedly, the initiative for academic freedom currently being supported by the Tufts Republicans (as well as other groups) is intended to foster a diversity of viewpoints in the educational sphere. If such is the intent, then it seems that the next logical step is to encourage a diversity of views in the non-academic part of college life, specifically in the publications available to students. If, as the article ("Tufts' student liberal magazine Radix de-recognized by TCUJ" April 28) states, Radix is unable to fulfill this necessary role in the realm of campus publications, another organization must be formed to do so. It is unconscionable that a liberal campus such as this one can allow for such a lack to exist. It isn't that there is not enough support for the liberal view; it is that Radix did not make its presence known. As an incoming freshman, I only recently learned there even was such a group. Had there been a well-publicized, well-organized general interest meeting, then support would have been found to keep the group alive and publishing. The foundation is there already; the liberal underclassmen must step up and breathe life back into a dying group. In order to thrive, a group needs to keep its momentum going. It needs to make use of the resources available, but most importantly, it needs to reach out to the student body. Radix signatory Joshua Koritz said in the article, "it is really a shame that there was such a lack of interest." It is not that there are too few liberals to make a publication worthwhile. As a majority of the students, the liberals are apparently apathetic to the need to spread liberal opinion and create a forum for expression. This is especially surprising considering that the country is currently Republican led. Liberals may be the campus majority, but in the rest of the world, this is not the case. A publication is needed to encourage interest and action. The Tufts Republicans are not the group that first comes to mind when considering the conservative view, it is the Primary Source. The Tufts Democrats need a similar presence; something seen every week, all over campus, a reminder of the issues important to liberals. A motivator is needed and a publication can do that, but apparently that publication cannot be Radix as it currently stands. Radix was run, according to TCUJ Advocacy Chair Jordana Starr, "... mostly by seniors and graduate students." It is the undergraduates' and especially the underclassmen's responsibility now to take over and create a viable publication. Diversity of available views must be maintained. In the very same issue of the Daily, there was an article summarizing the results of a poll conducted by the paper. The fact that a group dedicated to liberal ideas has just been de-recognized by the University seems to indicate a decline in interest in those views has taken place. In reality, according to the Daily's own poll, the liberals are still strongly represented in the campus population. Seventy-two percent of the 346 students polled were either dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with the current administration in the White House. Eighty percent of students polled said they supported embryonic stem cell research, a program supported mainly by liberals. Where is the forum available to express these ideas? Where is the liberals' Primary Source? While it is the liberal students who must create a publication in which to unify their views, it is in the best interest of all the students on campus to support this initiative, regardless of their personal beliefs. We are a school that prides itself on diversity. We need to act on this idea.Margaux Birdsall is a freshman who has yet to declare a major.


The Setonian
News

Viewpoint | Campus publication censorship

In an article a couple of weeks ago for my column, "The Social Entrepreneur," I proposed a list of 10 things Tufts students could do to become better members of the Tufts Community. One of these items was, "Say thank you to a Tufts worker." The overwhelming majority of my experiences with Tufts staff have been extraordinarily positive. Every transcript I ordered has been sent, every room I reserved has been reserved and every question I have had has been answered. But I witnessed something the other day that smeared my rosy image of Tufts workers. It all started when I was tabling for one of my jobs as summer storage and shipping manager for collegeboxes.com and Tufts Student Resources. As many of you have experienced firsthand, tabling is an essential part of marketing for any event. Dragging yourself to the dining halls and heckling exiting diners about your event is a right of passage for any successful event planner. It was the last Friday afternoon before classes ended and the last thing I wanted to be doing was table at the dining hall. But I did it anyway for the sake of getting that extra customer. As I was reading the Daily, a student came into the dining hall with newly minted copies of the Tufts Observer. Although I've never been a huge fan of the Observer, I always make a point to pick up a copy of the shiny weekly magazine when I see it around campus. I picked up my hot-off-the-press copy started perusing the latest issue. As I looked up, I noticed a Tufts dining worker pick up half of the copies of the magazine and throw them right into the trash. I was dumbfounded by such an utter disregard for all the hard work and student activities money that had just been thrown away. I realize that there is a need to keep the dining halls clean, but this act was stepping over the line. The magazine had just been placed in the designated area in neat piles. There was no mess, just pages of writing and hours of hard work. Being an on-campus journalist this semester I know first-hand how much work goes into developing, writing and publishing an on-campus publication. I've spent hours writing, researching and editing my column. Similarly, students that write for the Observer have logged as many hours putting out a weekly magazine on top of classes, friends and extra-curriculars. But all of this effort went into the garbage can last Friday. I was appalled by this act and felt it necessary to take the time to write a viewpoint about it. How many issues of campus publications have gone unread? How many painstakingly researched articles have not seen the light of day? How many witty columns have only been seen by the bottom of a trash pail? How many student activity dollars have been wasted? I remember reading some college guide before coming to Tufts that said that campus publications do not get read by students. Is this a result of an apathetic student population or merely dining hall workers throwing away publications prematurely? I'll be the first to admit that Tufts school spirit isn't the greatest, but I don't think it'll get any better by censorship of Tufts publications by dining hall workers. Most of the dining hall workers I have encountered have been friendly and assiduous. But seeing the dining hall employee throw away copies of an on-campus publication just as they were placed in a publication-designated spot has smeared my image of Tufts Dining Services. Admissions tour guides are quick to brag to prospective students and parents that Tufts dining is highly ranked among colleges around the nation in food quality; I'd propose that Tufts dining is also highly ranked in Soviet style censorship of campus media. Tufts students (or their parents) pay a lot to attend a world class university with many opportunities at hand, one of which is writing and publishing a student publication. Seeing the Observer thrown away before it can have a chance to be read should be appalling to every Tufts student. Tuft Community Union Senators and Tufts administrators should make sure that this does not happen in the future.Loi To is a junior majoring in political science and Russian.


The Setonian
News

Prof's book shines light on 'the real Oppie'

It's the kind of review authors of all stripes dream of. The New York Times' review of "American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer" - which was written by Tufts History Professor Martin Sherwin and Kai Bird, a contributing editor for The Nation - contained the following accolade: "'American Prometheus' is a work of voluminous scholarship and lucid insight, unifying its multifaceted portrait with a keen grasp of Oppenheimer's essential nature." The 25-years-in-the-making biography exposes the public triumph and humiliation of Oppenheimer, who oversaw the development of the atomic bomb and was later accused and convicted of being a security risk. Sherwin said that for him, the highlight of researching the life of Oppenheimer - called "Oppie" by his friends - was finding evidence to suggest that the physicist was framed. "We believe we have uncovered legal grounds to overturn the verdict in Oppenheimer's security hearing," Sherwin said. "We show that the FBI illegally wiretapped Oppenheimer's lawyer's phone, thus violating the lawyer-client relationship." "This information was passed to Lewis Strauss and to the AEC [Atomic Energy Commission] prosecutor, Roger Robb, who used this illegally obtained information against Oppenheimer," Sherwin said. "Furthermore, during the hearing itself, Robb violated federal regulations that govern the conduct of security hearings. For example, he showed Edward Teller some of Oppenheimer's confidential testimony before Teller testified. He did this to be sure Teller testified against Oppenheimer." "Also, we have evidence that suggests that Strauss virtually bribed one of the Atomic Energy Commissioners to swing his vote against Oppenheimer," Sherwin said. "The whole proceeding was - as the dissenting member of the hearing board wrote - 'a black mark on the escutcheon of our country.'" Sherwin believes that the gravity of nuclear weapons must be thoroughly recognized - as did, paradoxically, his subject. "Oppenheimer urged us to do everything possible to minimize our reliance on nuclear weapons and to work toward eliminating them," Sherwin said. "He understood that the world is better off - safer, really - without nuclear weapons. He believed that we should work for the international control of all forms of atomic energy, as he did in the postwar period. He saw that unilateralism was not in America's interest." According to Sherwin, Oppenheimer also saw that the proliferation of atomic weaponry was not in America's interest, either. "In 1946, he proposed what became known as the Acheson-Lilienthal Plan (it was really the Oppenheimer plan) which proposed the creation of an international atomic authority with sovereign control over all aspects of the nuclear industry," Sherwin said. "A small part of this plan has been put in place: the International Atomic Energy Authority with headquarters in Vienna, Austria. But the heart of the plan, which would eliminate nuclear weapons, has obviously been neglected." Sherwin's April 2005 publication of this biography is largely a reflection of his influences here on the Hill. According to Sherwin, the term of former Tufts President Jean Mayer allowed Sherwin to expand both his and the University's relationships with the global community. It was Mayer's vision to turn Tufts into a university that focused on supporting professors' continual individual research. According to former University Provost and current German, Russian, and Asian Languages Professor Sol Gittleman, Mayer's support of Tufts faculty members' research allowed Sherwin to "explode and take off" in his own academic quests. With Mayer's support, Sherwin established Tufts' Nuclear Age and Humanities Center, which provides an objective forum for the public to better understand the diplomatic and political ideologies initiated in the Cold War. Two years later, in 1988, through a joint teaching venture, Sherwin enabled students at Tufts and at Soviet universities in Moscow to connect via satellite television and simultaneous interpretation four times a year. This work required Sherwin to frequently travel to Moscow. While in Moscow, Sherwin was able to collect extensive information for a soon-to-be-published documentary that will cover the research and public and private life of Igor Kurchatev, the creator of the Soviet nuclear bomb. Sherwin had the opportunity to meet with Kurchatev's close friends, former KGB agents and Soviet scientists. "American Prometheus" is not Sherwin's first literary publication on American Cold War policies. While lecturing in the history department at Princeton University in 1975, Sherwin published "A World Destroyed: Hiroshima and the Origins of the Arms Race." The life of Oppenheimer fascinated Sherwin for many reasons. Foremost, the fact that so much of Oppenheimer's pre-public life was hidden attracted Sherwin, who said that he wished the public could have a greater knowledge of "the real Oppie." In 1993 Sherwin returned to his alma mater, Dartmouth College, to take over the John Sloan Dickey Center for International Understanding. In 1995, back at Tufts, he realized that he had to do something dramatic to "re-start and complete this Oppenheimer biography." As a result, he teamed up with Bird to finish "American Prometheus." Sherwin considers his and Bird's work together to be a "great collaboration." Sherwin met Bird in the early 1980s while collaborating on several articles related to the controversy at the Smithsonian Museum about the ill-fated Enola Gay exhibit. This Wednesday, Sherwin will be at the Harvard Bookstore in Cambridge to talk about and sign copies of his work. This summer, he plans to continue touring with Bird to promote "American Prometheus."


The Setonian
News

Viewpoint | Attacks at Concert Board are misled

Hi there. My name's Aaron, and I'm on concert board. Some of you might remember me as the guy who was doing security on the right side of the stage, keeping people from jumping on a plank of wood where the many thousand dollars worth of subwoofers were. (If you were one of those who made that job quite pleasant and helped me with it, feel free to ignore the rest of this Viewpoint.) But most of you probably remember me as the guy you threw cans at like a bunch of five-year-old little brats as he tried to get Goldfinger's drum kit off. Oh sorry, is that a little too harsh? Let's lay it out, then. My day started at 7:30 a.m. I was one of the lucky Concert Board members who didn't have to arrive at Spring Fling until late - quite a few people were setting up at the stage at 6 a.m. At 9:30 Goldfinger's equipment showed up and we busted our backs getting it all on the stage. We did the same at 10:30 when Apollo Sunshine showed up and then we set-up for the Walkmen. In between all this Concert Board members were running around, getting things set up and making sure the equipment was just right; running sound checks and stringing wires back and forth. I got a break and went and got some food and then came back before Goldfinger started to play. I was supposed to be free to go and enjoy Goldfinger. I'm a ska and punk kid from way back when - I love this type of music. I love being in the pit and rocking out. But bodies were needed behind the barricades so instead of being able to enjoy myself, I was busy making sure you all didn't break the equipment and hurt yourselves. I gave up my having fun so that you could enjoy yourselves. And after the show I was helping to move Goldfinger's kit off stage when Howie, our stage manager, got word that representatives from Tufts were shutting us down because it was too dangerous. Note that again: Tufts shut us down. None of the C-board volunteers had any say in it. And after you all got pissy and threw things at us, we still stayed late to clean up and pack the sound equipment and stage away. All for free. Let's rewind and go over that for a sec again. Because the guys at the sound boards were getting increasingly bigger electrical shocks to the point where the electrician declared it not safe for the show to continue, we're the bad guys. Because we didn't risk someone's life, my friends and I deserved to get whacked in the head by a giant can of imported Japanese beer (and whoever threw that, you're a moron. That stuff costs money). You still got to see three great bands, have a show put on for you for free, and to spend the whole day downing beers and relaxing. Puts you over us. You're upset Busta Rhymes got cancelled. That's understandable. But guess what? I'm willing to put plenty of cash on the line that you're not nearly as upset as those of us on Concert Board were. You know why? Because for you, Spring Fling is an opportunity to wake up one morning and start drinking, then go see a free show. For us, it's been months of planning down the drain. We lined up two high profile leading acts. We secured an up-and-coming opening act. We even got a good indie rock band to fill in between sets. We set up at 7:00 in the morning and cleaned up until 6:30 at night, we spent OUR time freely to give YOU guys something fun, and we're the bad guys? Sure, there are perks to concert board. I enjoyed hanging out with Goldfinger's drummer as he made fun of all the idiots and assholes in the crowd. He got a good laugh out of you. But overall, it's a ton of work with no reward. So maybe instead of being angry at us, you should be happy that we're willing to put in the effort to put on these shows. Because without us, there are no concerts at Tufts. How would you like that? Maybe we should try it next year. Because it's entirely possible that due to the problems we had this year, the administration will decide that Spring Fling should have a year off. We're supposed to be a smart school. Learn to think.Aaron Mehta is a sophomore majoring in history.


The Setonian
News

TV Review | The Griffin family makes its triumphant return to prime time TV

On February 14, 2002 Fox aired "Family Guy Viewer Mail #1," the season finale of the third season of the animated comedy. In May of that year, Fox debuted its fall line-up, with "Family Guy" nowhere to be found, unceremoniously dropping the show in favor of inferior programming. Three years later, last night to be specific, in an unprecedented move, the Griffin family made a triumphant, long-awaited and improbable return. Of course, there was the great fear that after three years the writers wouldn't be able to catch lightning in a bottle again. Many, if not most college students, have only seen "Family Guy" as it has exploded in popularity on DVD and the Cartoon Network. Many of us also idolize the show, watching downloaded episodes late at night in dorm rooms. The fact that most of us haven't seen many first run airings demonstrates how long it has been since the Griffins graced network TV. Don't fear for the show, though; MacFarlane recruited many veteran "Family Guy" writers, and now half of the staff is made of former scribes. That turned out to be the right move, as about three minutes into last night's premiere it was clear that "Family Guy" is back, having lost no noticeable steam or edge. Almost miraculously, the style and tone are the same, and the show doesn't seem to have skipped a beat. It would have been easy for the "Family Guy" team to try to do too much in their first show back, to really push the envelope even more than its usual efforts. Luckily, this wasn't the case, and in the end it was clear that the creative team made the right decision just to make a typical "Family Guy" episode. In the main plot of the classic two-plot structure, Peter and his long-suffering wife Lois head out on a second honeymoon in an attempt to reenergize their sex life. They con their way into Mel Gibson's barely used New York City hotel room and stumble upon a copy of Gibson's newest movie, the sequel to his "Passion of the Christ." Believing it his duty to protect people from more of Gibson's "Jesus mumbo-jumbo," Peter decides to steal and destroy the film. The perhaps just-as-outlandish sub-plot finds demonic infant Stewie and talking family dog Brian supervising the other Griffin kids, middle-schooler Chris, and teenager Meg. Brian and Stewie become increasinglyparental, chaperoning a middle school dance and even laying in bed while Stewie croquets a pillow that says "Die Lois." The show's keen sense of pop-culture parody is still razor sharp; the writers have always done a terrific job of lampooning television shows and films. Highlights in the premiere included a "Honeymooners" take-off where Ralph Cramden finally follows through on his promise of "to the moon Alice," and a twisted version of "Two and a Half Men." G.I. Joe appears out of a bathroom stall to educate the kids on drinking and informing them that "knowing is half the battle," paying homage to the public service announcements at the end of every "G.I. Joe," which concluded with that axiom. Of course another trademark of "Family Guy" has been its harsh criticism of religion and politics, and that is also abundantly present. Brian reads Michael Moore's "Dude, Where's My Country," and his car sports a "Kucinich 2004" sticker. Peter recounts how he convinced America to go to war with Iraq by explaining his credo, "Anyone who doesn't want to go to war is gay." And don't worry, the offensive and sometimes racist jokes that earned the program so much ire and press over its previous run remain (a scene involving Pinocchio and a pedophilic Geppetto immediately comes to mind). But it's not just vulgar and crude gags that made "Family Guy" a cult hit. Pushing the envelope has always been the show's bread and butter, but it couldn't do that so effectively without brilliant and fearless writers. It was, and now is, perhaps the most offensive show on network television, but also one of the cleverest (especially with "Arrested Development" most likely on the sidelines). The story of "Family Guy" may go down in television history. Never before has a show done what it has done. It's become one of the most important programs in the evolution of entertainment, as it demonstrated the power of DVD sales. Now Fox is behind the show and it won't have to worry about ratings. Finally, after six years, "Family Guy" is getting the attention and support it has always deserved. The end of the premiere typifies the warped humor of "Family Guy." A naked, greased up, deaf man seen from an earlier episode tells the audience, "It's good to be back, America." Well, "Family Guy," it's good to have you back.


The Setonian
News

Tufts must disclose nature of investment

As a member of Environmental Consciousness Outreach (ECO), I would like to thank everyone who voted in support of our wind power referendum last Wednesday ("ECO measure passes with 88 percent approval," April 27). This makes a strong statement that Tufts students support a clean energy future, and now it is up to the administration to act accordingly. If Tufts purchases wind power, it will go a long way towards reducing the negative environmental and health impacts associated with conventional fossil fuel forms of energy. However, although purchasing clean, renewable energy is important, we must also keep in mind that our university's endowment may be invested in the very fossil fuel corporations that contribute to environmental degradation and climate change. We have no way of knowing this, since Tufts currently does not require its money-managers to disclose the exact nature of their investments. I am currently working on a campaign about these issues with support from EnviroCitizen, an environmental non-profit. Tufts must leverage its financial power to steer corporations in more sustainable directions, thus ensuring that its endowment is not being used to support destructive practices. This can only enhance the university's current reputation as a social and environmental leader.Aditya Nochur LA '07


The Setonian
News

Correction: Monday, May 2, 2005

An article last week ("Students protest for Asian American studies at Tufts," April 28), misidentified the purpose of the AACT as that of creating an Asian American studies department at Tufts. In fact, AACT has only ever requested that there be a tenured/tenure-track Asian Americanist professor, that University offer more Asian Americanist courses, or that the Asian American studies program exist within another department or major. In addition, the article noted that members of the AACT spoke informally with University Provost Jamshed Bharucha, when in fact the meeting was formal.


The Setonian
News

Viewpoint | The importance of Tufts' Child Development program

What is the role of university research in its community? How can applied research in human development inform programs and policies? What constitutes effective youth programming? Is adolescence necessarily a period of storm and stress? What are the constituents of positive youth development that lead young people to contribute to civil society? How are young people a force in third world development? These varied questions might pique the interest of members of diverse disciplines and interests at Tufts. And there is one place that is addressing them all at once! This hidden treasure is disguised under fancy names such Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development and Applied Development Science. The "what" science, you ask? Yes, it's a mouthful. Under the direction of Professor Richard M. Lerner, the Bergstrom Chair in Applied Developmental Science, this deceptively small lab of the Child Development Department (3rd floor in the Lincoln-Filene center) is empiricizing the theories behind healthy adolescent development. From undergraduates to doctoral students, the converts of applied developmental science are busily applying their knowledge about positive youth development to encourage a shift away from a deficiency-based model of adolescence. In layperson's terms, that just means focus on the good stuff and the ramifications can be incredible. So why do I feel compelled to tell you this only days before I graduate? My missionary-like zeal for the above-stated institute and for applied developmental science stems from the fact that it changed my life and the way I think. It worked itself into my everyday vocabulary, and all that other clich?©d stuff that's supposed to happen to you in college. My first encounter with the Institute for Applied Research in Youth Development was when I stumbled upon Professor Lerner's undergraduate seminar, usually offered in the spring. Sadly, this spring the enrollment was too low and the class had to be cancelled. I am heartbroken that a whole generation will lose the opportunity that opened so many doors to me. To compensate, the Institute just hosted a lecture series about positive youth development in an international context featuring experts that are applying developmental science to address the needs of youth internationally. Our first speaker, William Reese, President and CEO of the International Youth Foundation, addressed tsunami relief in relation to youth development. He talked about multi-sectoral partnering between governments, NGO's, the corporate sector, and the military to form an agenda for long-term rebuilding. He posed the questions of how to channel the immense outpouring prompted by December's tsunami to other, less visible, global disasters. Our second speaker, Maria Adenil Vieira, a Visiting Scholar at Harvard, first introduced to us as a "Brazilian youth development guru" talked about partnering with youth for sustainable agricultural development in Northeastern Brazil. She posed the important question of once an effective youth program is established, how can it be made sustainable and how can it reach scale, or reach all young people in need? Our final speaker arrived April 23rd and spoke about youth development in Africa. He juxtaposed the U.N. paradigm for youth development that focuses on external factors, such as hunger, poverty, and disease, with a positive youth development model that focuses on internal assets of youth such as confidence, compassion, and competence. Dr. Wawa Ngenge has over 20 years of expertise in youth development in his work with the Cameroonian government, the United Nations, and the National 4-H Council. As you see, this approach has almost unviversal applicability. So this is my final plug before I am on my way out. I hope that all Tufts students will consider this course and how it embodies the philosophy of the Eliot-Pearson Department of Child Development. I hope you consider how child development is a microcosm of national development. I hope that youth development and investment in youth enters into the dialogues of international development and of civic engagement that are so embedded in this university. And finally, I can tick "writing a viewpoint for the Daily" off my life's to-do list. Avantika Taneja is a senior majoring in anthropology and child development.




The Setonian
News

The Daily asks the questions and superstar Tom Cruise answers

Tom Cruise just keeps on truckin'. His career, now entering its third decade, stands almost without parallel, his memorable roles too numerous to count. Achieving instant stardom in 1983's "Risky Business," the blockbuster hits haven't stopped since. From having a need for speed in "Top Gun," to not being able to handle the truth in "A Few Good Men," and being completed by Ren?©e Zellweger in "Jerry Maguire," Cruise has just about done it all. The Daily, along with other college papers, caught up with the superstar promoting his upcoming film "War of the Worlds," directed by Steven Spielberg and due out June 29.



The Setonian
News

Bubs end year in perfect harmony

Tonight, Cohen Auditorium will reverberate with the smooth sounds of the Beelzebubs, Tufts' oldest male a cappella group. In their last performance of the year, the guys promise a fantastic evening replete with harmonies, skits and laughs. The "Bubs in the Pub" program presents nearly every song the Bubs have sung this year, as well as selections from their latest CD, "Shedding."


The Setonian
News

Med School grad convicted of scholarship fraud

A U.S. District Court in Boston sentenced Arijit Kumar Chowdhury (M '00), a graduate of Tufts' School of Medicine, to 364 days in prison, two years of supervised release, and deportation to his native India on Tuesday, April 19.