Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Correction

Due to an editing error, an article about a Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate resolution regarding academic freedom ("TCU Senate resolution on academic freedom passes," Feb. 16) unintentionally misrepresented the views of senior TCU senator Matthew Pohl. The article falsely suggested that Pohl supported the resolution introduced by the Tufts Academic Freedom Project. Pohl actually submitted a competing resolution stating that Tufts already has a policy on academic freedom.


The Setonian
News

Cheaters never prosper,' but some are fluorishing

You're in the middle of an econ test that you think you're bombing, so you sign online with your T-Mobile Sidekick cell phone and IM your roommate, asking him or her to explain comparative and absolute advantage to you, ASAP. Welcome to cheating in the new millennium. Though text-messaging technology provides students with a new way to cheat, attempting to do so in some classes at Tufts would be a problematic endeavor. History Professor George Marcopoulos said many history exams are written ones that involve conceptualization, and it's "virtually impossible" to transmit concepts via text messaging. In departments which focus on quantitative analyses, such as the biology and engineering departments, text messaging is well suited to cheating. Professors safeguard against these possibilities, however. In biology exams, "the first time you pull out your phone you would definitely be under questioning," senior Alyssa Lillo said. More old-fashioned methods of cheating, however, have increased on the Tufts campus. Dean of Students Bruce Reitman said that academic dishonesty cases involving plagiarism have tripled during his four years as Dean of Students. The abundance of academic information on the Internet raises intellectual property right concerns. As more and more students use the Internet to research information, the distinction between plagiarism and original work has been blurred. The Tufts Academic Integrity Pamphlet defines plagiarism as ranging from word-for-word copying of texts to cutting and pasting phrases of someone else's writing. Because of the complexities of plagiarism, students often forget that not citing properly or simply rephrasing others' thoughts is actually cheating. "There's a distinction between plagiarism, which is being honest but not recognizing sources, and fraud," Reitman said. Although no university-wide honor code exists, Tufts faculty expects students to maintain the highest level of academic integrity. If suspected academic dishonesty does occur, however, it is up to the professor to decide whether they want to handle the matter individually, or to report the case to the Dean of Students. Punishments for cheating vary depending on the gravity of the infraction. Students agree that some degree of cheating does occur on campus, though it is generally in the form of copying problem sets or homework problems. Grades on these assignments usually have less impact on a student's final grade than papers or tests. When it comes to situations where individuals have to show their proficiency in a subject, many Tufts students pressure themselves into self-sufficiency. "That's why during exam periods, people are holed up in the library," Lillo said. For others, though, laziness may be a determining factor in the decision to cheat. "Some kids waste time and don't study, but want the good grades," senior Kate Rosenbaum said. Humanities professors like Marcopoulos minimize cheating on in-class exams by mandating that students sit at least one seat apart from one another. Also, when Marcopoulos assigns take-home written essays, finding plagiarism is easy: his small class sizes allow him to recognize each student's writing style. Like many other faculty members, Marcopoulos trusts his students. "I don't go in looking for cheaters; I expect students to maintain their own academic integrity." he said. Public disclosures of cheating, such as reporter Dan Rather's mishaps with CBS, have made some Tufts students more aware of the consequences of dishonesty. Senior Tim Reardon agrees that cheating is "putting your career on the line." Although corporate fraud and the downloading of free music may blur public conceptions of cheating and not cheating, to several Tufts students, these have no effect on their own academic honesty. "I think that while other scandals affect the way we may think about piracy or white collar crimes, academic cheating is in a class by itself," junior Carrie Benjamin said. Reitman said that the recent public mishaps are unfortunate, adding that "the most valuable thing that any of us have is our reputations, because they affect everything we do."


The Setonian
News

Presidential Symposium explores Tufts' community involvement

The University College of Citizenship and Public Service and the Office of Community Relations discussed Tufts' ongoing involvement with the community at the Third Annual Presidential Symposium yesterday. The symposium accompanied the release of the University College booklet entitled "Partnering for Community Impact" - a directory and guide to service opportunities for members of the Tufts community. The meeting opened with an address by University President Lawrence Bacow, who drew attention to the University's current community service strengths. Dean of the University College Robert Hollister focused on organizing community priorities, expanding orientation programs for students in host communities, and continuing and expanding Community Day. Other priorities included "matching community service to supply and demand and clarifying respective roles and responsibilities for community partnerships," Hollister said. A panel of faculty, moderated by Lincoln Filene Professor Molly Mead, brought anecdotal presentations of local projects. Child Development Professor Maryanne Wolf, Chair of Civil and Environmental Engineering Professor Chris Swan, and Urban and Environmental Policy and Planning Professor Robert Russell discussed applying community work to their respective fields, from hazardous waste site clean-up to literacy and environmental education. The community booklet was then introduced. It aims to enable community groups and services to connect with students interested in getting involved in local projects.--Compiled by Kat Schmidt and Ilona Solomon


The Setonian
News

Ice Hockey | Jumbos attempt to continue successful NESCAC run against Trinity, Wesleyan

After winning the last two home games of the regular season, the Jumbos are heading into the weekend with high hopes. With an exciting 4-2 victory over Hamilton College on Saturday afternoon, the Tufts hockey team gave coach Brian Murphy the 75th victory of his career with the Jumbos, making him the program's all-time win leader. The jump in level of competition in NESCAC play resulted in more losses than wins in the previous three years, but the Jumbos have displayed signs of progress every season. Tufts qualified for the NESCAC Tournament in each of the past three seasons, and this year's 11-10-1 overall record is the best since 2000-01 and includes a 4-2-1 mark against NESCAC teams. With the win on Friday, Tufts improved its chances of securing a spot in the upcoming conference tournament. Tufts also came out on top against Amherst on Friday night, 4-3. The Jumbos overcame three power play goals by the Lord Jeffs (10-9-2, 8-6-2) to pick up the W. The freshmen class came up strong, as Joe Cappellano and Greg O'Connell both scored and fellow classmate Ross Gimbel had assists on both goals. Freshman James Kalec was solid again in goal for Tufts, making 27 saves to earn his sixth win. "Those two wins last weekend against Amherst and Hamilton are huge and we look to build off them as we go into this weekend," sophomore Matt Dalton said. "We know we're playing two good teams this weekend and that we have to go out, work extremely hard, and play as a team, just like we did last weekend." The Jumbos' wins comprised the team's first weekend sweep of NESCAC competitors since joining the league. Tufts looks to continue its league run this weekend as it takes to the road, battling Trinity, the No. 1 team in NESCAC, on Friday and going head-to-head with Wesleyan on Saturday. Last year, the Bantams handed Tufts their most lopsided loss of the season, downing the Jumbos 11-1. Junior captain Kenny Cleary had the lone goal for the Jumbos in a losing effort. Trinity's ice hockey team, which has a regular season record of 17-2-2 and sits in first place with a four-point lead NESCAC at 13-2-2, climbed to a best-ever national ranking of No. 6 nationally. Tufts had considerably more success against Wesleyan last year as they pulled out their final win of the season, 2-0. The Jumbos hope to have an easier time against the Cardinals, as they are ranked behind Tufts in the NESCAC and are 4-16-2 overall. Looking forward, once the two away games are over, the Jumbos will start gearing up for the playoffs. Last weekend's victories further helped the Jumbos' chances of earning one of the eight spots into the upcoming NESCAC playoffs. "We've actually had a playoff mentality the past few weeks, treating every game and practice like it was the playoffs," Dalton said. "But as of right now, we're just focused on this weekend."


The Setonian
News

Nobel winner lectures on happiness, memory

Princeton University's Daniel Kahneman, a psychology professor and the 2002 Nobel Prize winner for economics, delivered the second annual Snyder Presidential Lecture series to a full house in Cabot Auditorium yesterday afternoon. Kahneman has spent the past decade researching the elements of well-being, attempting to understand what makes people happy and satisfied. In doing so, his studies have raised new questions about moods, pleasure and pain. The lecture, entitled "Towards a Science of Well-Being," began with Kahneman introducing the concept of two selves, an "experiencing self" and a "remembering self." For 12 years, Kahneman studied the discrepancies between how people feel about an experience in the moment and how they recall those same feelings later. Kahneman discussed his finding that people rate their feelings about an event differently while they are experiencing it than when they attempt to recall it. "The overall impression [of an event] is determined as an average of [how people felt] at the peak and at the end," he said. This leads to "duration neglect" and memories tend not to encompass everything that happened. "People seem to produce representative moments [of an event]," he said. "By collapsing experience into moments, they seem to lose almost all impact of duration... There is a discrepancy and the remembering self is missing out on something." Kahneman said there are several experiments to back up this claim. In one experiment, subjects were asked to rate their feelings at regular intervals as they watched pleasant and unpleasant films. In another, patients undergoing painful medical procedures rated their pain level every 60 seconds. These self-ratings were then compared to how people rated their overall experience after some time had passed, and lead to the conclusion that the "remembering self" reduces memories to mere moments and proceeds to make judgments based on these shortened memories. Kahneman applied this idea to a larger concept, comparing general, overall well-being and satisfaction with moods and immediate emotions. The findings thus far indicate, to Kahneman's initial surprise, that even major setbacks and advances do not drastically alter long-term happiness. "The distortions in memory are primarily distortions in global evaluation," he said. He reported that in studies of lottery winners, paraplegics, and widows, there are not drastic long-term differences in well-being despite extreme positive and negative experiences. "General life circumstances have small effects," he said. "This is a big puzzle. We need to understand what is happening here. We need to understand it because it violates our intuitions." The larger effects on mood came from momentary circumstances, Kahneman said. "We find a lot of variability in day-in-the-life studies," he said. Part of the research included attempts to understand what makes people feel the most pleasure. Some results were obvious, he said, but others were surprising to researchers. "You don't need a lot of research to know that sex is better than commuting," he said. Among the things found to have a low correlation with happiness was income, whereas socializing with people, especially friends, brings the most satisfaction. "The only thing worse than being alone is being with a boss," Kahneman said of the findings. Kahneman acknowledged the studies were preliminary and new, saying that researchers have just "scratched the surface" of learning about well-being. But, he said, this is why he was invited in the first place. The Snyder Presidential Lecture Series is "intended to bring to campus people who have revolutionized their fields, taken on conventional wisdom and championed new ways of thinking," Dean of Undergraduate Education James Glaser said. As a psychologist, Kahneman won the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences for his research on intuitions and the roles they play in judgment and decision-making.


The Setonian
News

Men's Volleyball | Club team goes 1-2 at Dartmouth

The men's volleyball team put forth an intense effort this past weekend. The team's play was greatly improved despite losing two contests by scores of 2-0 to Boston College (BC) and MIT at the tournament, which was held at Dartmouth on Saturday. The team did manage to win against UMass-Lowell in a 2-0 match. Despite the 1-2 record, the team's play was greatly improved from a 0-3 outing a week ago, and the Jumbos are beginning to show potential for future success. Although the team struggled in the North A Divisional match on Feb. 5, it was able to regain a better pace last Saturday. The improvements come just in time for the Interdivisional tournaments to be held at Yale this weekend. According to senior co-captain Colin Pedersen, the players are becoming more unified and coordinating better on the court. "We are a very deep team this year, but we have struggled to put it all together," Pedersen said. "This past weekend at Dartmouth the intensity was high, which is something we had been lacking the weekend before. If we keep up our concentration and get into a rhythm, the matches will go our way." Ramon-Carlo Galicia, a graduate student at the Tufts' Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, continued to stand out as a go-to player, making several successful hits. The rest of the team stepped up as well, but even with successful passes and sets, the Jumbos weren't able to pull off consecutive wins. "Everybody has moments of brilliance," Pedersen said. "But we need to get everyone playing on the same page." The three matches that the Jumbos played on Saturday may not have all ended in victory, but they certainly showed the growing strength of the team. Playing against UMass-Lowell resulted in an easy 2-0 win for the Jumbos, but when it came to two stronger teams, Boston College and MIT, they fell short. Against BC, the team was clearly outmatched, and was never really in either game. In the MIT games however, Tufts often held the lead late in the game before falling apart in the end. The team's main problem continues to be a lack of overall cohesiveness, which should improve as the Jumbos continue to practice three times a week. The team is looking forward to the Yale Interdivisionals on Sunday, Feb. 20. The tournament is especially important for the team, as the results will ultimately determine whether or not the team will advance to the New England Championships, held in April. When the Jumbos venture down to New Haven, Connecticut it will be important for them to have success in all aspects of play, and not focus on only the sets or passes individually. This season, the team has played well when it has jumped out in the beginnings of games to a comfortable lead, but has struggled when it has had to play from behind, which has been more often than not. In the fall though, this trend was not the case, as the team overcame deficits to win several tournaments. For instance, in November, the team won a preseason tournament at UMass-Lowell in late November where it defeated Amherst, Stonehill and finally the hosting UMass-Lowell in the title game. The team is only now recovering from the months away from the court. Senior co-captain Mike Toomey described the effects of the layoff, which hit the team hard in its first tournament back on Feb. 5th. "[We] had a complete meltdown against the strongest teams in the league." And while this past weekend's 1-2 effort may be only marginally better, the improvement represents steps in the right direction that will only continue as the team practices and plays more together and develops more consistency. For now, the team is focused on and anticipating the tournament at Yale. The Interdivisional could serve as a springboard for the team, and may be just what the Jumbos need to catapult into a berth for the New England Championships.



The Setonian
News

The importance of climate change reaches boiling point

Feb. 16, 2005. Does this date mean anything to you? What about the Kyoto Protocol? Climate Change? Coastal flooding? Boston underwater?! Should I panic now or later? Feb. 16 marks the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol, a part of the 1992 U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change that finally goes into effect after seven years of jumping through political hoops. Kyoto sets a legally-binding cap on greenhouse gas emissions. President Bush's 2001 pullout led many to believe the treaty would fail. However, 141 nations, including the European Union, have signed, refusing to let the unilateral power playing of the world's biggest polluter determine their fate. Skepticism is healthy, but the debate over whether or not climate change exists is over. The scientific community, the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an organization of more than 2000 scientists, has reached consensus. A small, but vocal minority would lead you to believe otherwise. Admittedly, the efficacy of Kyoto to attain climate neutrality is questionable. However, the treaty represents an international commitment to collective action. The lackluster attitude of the current administration towards the Kyoto Protocol is understandable as Kyoto has a built-in penalization mechanism for noncompliance. If the United States signed Kyoto, it would immediately enter into noncompliance, costing America billions in levied fines. (Note that the U.S. is responsible for nearly 25 percent of global emissions). U.S. opponents fear that signing Kyoto would damage the U.S. economy, but pitting the environment and the economy against each other is no longer an adequate argument. The imminent weather and sea level changes will be expensive. A recently released E.P.A. study on the effects of climate change in Boston, cited in the Feb. 15 Boston Globe, priced the impact on Boston's metropolitan area buildings, emergency services, and energy prices at up to $94 billion over the next century. Boston is just one of hundreds of coastal cities; as sea levels continue to rise, small island nations like the Maldives will cease to exist. Our government may be dragging its feet, but Tufts has pledged to independently meet or beat the Kyoto Protocol; intending to make a 30 percent emissions reduction by 2012. This is part of Tufts commitment to the Talloires Declaration, a historic declaration initiated by Tufts' former President Jean Mayer. "Universities educate most of the people who develop and manage society's institutions; [they] bear profound responsibilities to increase the awareness, knowledge, technologies, and tools to create an environmentally sustainable future" (www.ulsf.org). Tufts Climate Initiative, has worked tirelessly to make this a reality. Thanks to their dedication, students will soon witness the construction of Tufts' very own energy efficient "green dorm." Environmental Consciousness Outreach (ECO), Tufts' undergraduate environmental group, has its own clean energy-curb climate change campaign. ECO's push for Tufts to purchase renewable (wind) energy is a concerted effort towards joining over 50 universities, including Harvard, who have purchased percentages of their electricity from renewable energy sources. Connecticut College students voted to pay $25 per year to purchase wind. Certainly nobody likes fees, but I would gladly forgo one North-End dinner a year if it meant I helped steer Tufts in a more sustainable direction. This year's 20th EPIIC Symposium: Oil & Water, communicates climate change as a salient, pressing, international security issue. Though we joke that oil and water never combine, in reality, they coalesce in their relation to climate change. To articulate the causal relationship quickly - the combustion of fossil fuels exacerbates Earth's natural greenhouse effect, which perpetuates climate change, whose extreme weather systems threaten freshwater resources. (Say that ten times fast!) Any ecology student will tell you that the earth is a closed-loop system. Climate change is no exception; we are all affected. America may have the financial means to adapt but should we have to? Kyoto's ratification marks a turning point in global climate change mitigation efforts. It is admittedly only a first step, but I urge you to make a similar first step in going to this year's symposium. Its balanced panels feature experts from the oil industry, scientists from the IPCC, Nigerian government officials (one of the world's leading petroleum exporters), hydrologists, and nationally acclaimed authors. The symposium is a unique opportunity to learn directly from their wealth of knowledge. For the week of February 23-27, suspend your personal, political, or intellectual inclinations and attend the EPIIC symposium with your uncertainties and open mind.


The Setonian
News

Women's Swimming and Diving | Jumbos prepare for Championship meet

The women's swimming and diving team was the Cinderella story of the 2004 NESCAC Championship. The team surprised almost everybody when they took fourth place behind swimming powerhouses Williams, Middlebury and Amherst. Despite the losses of many key swimmers due to various reasons this winter, the Jumbos will look to emulate their performance from last season and come away with a top-five finish at this year's NESCAC Championships. The three-day event, which begins Friday, will be hosted by Middlebury. The conference features many nationally ranked swimmers and teams, including annual favorite Williams, which has won the NESCAC title four years in a row. "Realistically, Williams will probably have no problem winning," coach Nancy Bigelow said. "It looks like Middlebury and Amherst will compete for second, and Colby also has a strong team this year. We should place anywhere from fifth to eighth. We are going up against some outstanding competition." The Jumbos should be fresh for the meet. Their last meet was Feb. 5 at the MIT Invitational. The meet made for a stress-free race for those who were competing at the Championships. "We've worked really hard this season and on our training trip and now we are thoroughly rested," senior quad-captain Erica Weitz said. "I think everybody is psyched up and ready to swim fast." Bigelow agreed. "Everything they have done this season is geared up toward this last race," she said. "They have worked so hard. I want them to be pleased with their efforts and to really have fun as well." Individually, the swimmers will be going up against some of the top Div. III swimmers in the country. Connecticut College senior Kate Kovenock is an eight-time All American and will enter the NESCACs ranked first in the 50, 100, and 200 yard freestyle, as well as the 50 butterfly. Nationally, she is ranked in the top 10 in all three freestyle events. Bowdoin sophomore Katie Chapman, against whom Tufts raced earlier this year in a win over the Polar Bears, is also a top contender. While she will challenge Kovenock in the 200 free, she enters the race holding the best time in the 500 free. Two Middlebury freshmen, Marika Ross and Sara Cowie, should turn some heads as well. Cowie is ranked 11th in the country in the 1,650 freestyle and is the top seed in the distance freestyle events. Ross, also nationally ranked, holds the top time in the 100 and 200 butterfly and the 400 individual medley, and is ranked second in the 200 IM and the 50 fly. The most impressive swimmer in the race could be Williams senior Lindsay Payne, a two time national champion. Payne returned in the 2004-2005 season after taking a year off with a reputation to defend, having won the 50, 100 and 200 breaststroke at the 2003 Championships and setting meet records in all three events. She is currently the NCAA Division III record holder in the 100 and 200-yard breaststroke. For the Jumbos, there will be several swimmers looking to make a splash at the meet. While it is a long shot that any will win an individual championship, a top eight finish would be both impressive and within reach. Bigelow mentioned Weitz, sophomore Jessica Bollinger, freshman Allison Palomaki, freshman Bianca Spinosa, and sophomore Chloe Young-Hyman in her list of possible top eight finishers. "We have a bunch of swimmers who are going to get us points by placing in events," Bigelow said. "It's important we get contributions from everyone." Weitz hopes to perform well in her last collegiate race. "I want to swim my fastest times of the season and try and place in the top eight at finals," she said. "I've been doing this for 15 years, so it is going to be bittersweet. It will be exciting to race my last race, but it will also be a little bit sad."


The Setonian
News

Telemarketers, spam plague Tufts community

Potentially fraudulent credit card companies and disreputable businesses offering jobs have barraged Tufts students via phone and e-mail since the fall. One of the more frequent callers, the Clout Company, reportedly calls students multiple times a day. A Google search yields a list of complaints filed against the company. According to students who have received calls from the Clout Company, a representative from the company calls and asks for the person's social security number. If the person refuses to give that type of information over the phone, the company asks only for a name and address so the person can receive more information. The company will then proceed to send a credit card by mail immediately. The person receives monthly bills, but the company claims to never receive the payment and threatens to call a collection agency if the bill is not paid immediately. Freshman Chris Jenkins reported being called and offered a student Visa credit card repeatedly. "They called me about four times a day for three days. One time it was seven times in one day. I don't know how they got my number," Jenkins said. "They only asked for me. What scared me the most is that they got my personal information and my dorm room phone number." Despite Tufts Trumpeter Webmail spam and junk e-mail filters, some students have also received credit card solicitations in their Tufts e-mail accounts. Marj Minnigh, Manager of Networks and Special Projects for the University's Computer Services Department, works both with campus-wide computer and phone systems. "Tufts absolutely ... does not sell, rent, loan or otherwise give out any information about students. We also prevent the data from being hacked or harvested," Minnigh said. Bob Webber, Manager of University Systems in the Computer Services Department said that it is both relatively easy and cheap for spammers to gather mass amounts of e-mail addresses. "Spammers harvest e-mail addresses from sources such as archives of mailing lists, personal Web pages, and third parties who register e-mail addresses for contests or product registrations, and sometimes simply generate long lists of addresses that they try at random," he said. "[Tufts] would always refuse to sell your address - spammers aren't even interested in buying it, since they expect they'll get it at no cost somewhere else." Some students have also found messages in their Tufts e-mail inboxes promising easy or fun jobs in the Medford area that they could do while living at Tufts. "I get junk e-mails on my school account, but I don't open them." Jenkins said. "It's an invasion of privacy." Spam blockers work by looking for keywords in title headings and return addresses on e-mail that signal that the message is mass-mailed from a company Web site. Some more sophisticated companies can get around this filter by blocking keywords or using words that one would often find in e-mail title headings, although this is still an illegal practice.


The Setonian
News

May The Force Be With You This President's Day Weekend

Wookies, Klingons, and sentient computer programs, be on alert! This President's Day weekend, there's no better way to get back to the future than to stop by the Somerville Theater in Davis Square. This weekend marks the annual meeting of the Boston Science Fiction Film Festival, a 24-hour marathon of sci-fi movies, animated shorts, costume contests, and alien mating calls for the superhuman among us. The festival has been taking place annually since 1976, even before Luke Skywalker became a household name. Thus this year's event marks the 30th anniversary of the marathon. Every year, an average of 13 feature films are selected to be shown in the festival. This year's line up includes a mix of classic sci-fi and cutting-edge cinema. "Superman" (1978), "The Time Machine" (1960), and "Planet of the Apes" (1968) are all old favorites making a return, and they will be joined by "Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow" (2004) and "Starship Troopers 2: Heroes of the Federation" (2004). Festival organizer Garen Daly said that it is often difficult to predict which movies will be a hit with the crowd, and which ones will go the way of the first Death Star. "Sometimes you've got something that you think is going to be a really big hit and it doesn't work, and sometimes you just throw it in at the last second and it becomes an amazing hit," Daly said. "I usually try to find something a little unique and different, that people haven't seen a lot of before." Also intermixed are a series of animated shorts, including "Duck Dodgers" (2003), "Mr. Magoo"(1958), and "The Animatrix" (2003). The festival itself is much like a gigantic sleepover party. The 24-hour marathon runs from noon on Saturday to noon on Sunday, and Daly estimates that 75% to 80% of the attendees will stay all night long. Some take to the aisles in sleeping bags, some doze in their seats as the showing reaches the wee hours of the morning, and some fight to stay awake all night long for 24 straight hours of science fiction. "It's the biggest sleepover you could possibly imagine," Daly said. "It's like having friends over, going out and buying a bunch of chips, and just sitting in front of the television with movies all night long." As the night moves on to the wee hours of the morning, participants can also take part in contests and sponsored events. Marathon staples include a costume contest, a trivia contest, and prizes for the oldest and the youngest attendees, but there are also a few others that play to the audience's extraterrestrial side. "My favorite contest is the alien mating cry," Daly said. "After about twelve hours, you need something to let people let off a little steam, so the alien mating cry is a contest where the people get their creativity out and try to imagine what two protoplasms on Altair V would do if they were canoodling." The festival is also being expanded this year to include events other than the 24-hour marathon. For the first time, it will include two separate feature films, both of which were selected by Daly for inclusion in this year's festival. The program will open Friday evening with a showing of "The Creature from Sunny Side Up Trailer Park" (2004). Directed by Christopher Coppola, the nephew of famed director Francis Ford Coppola and brother of Nicolas Cage, the film tells the story of two brothers who arrive in a small desert town and find themselves tied to a mysterious ancient prophecy. The showing begins at 7 p.m. on Friday, and will be followed by a question and answer session with the director. Though it is included in the price of the marathon, separate admission is available for non-ticket holders. The festival will conclude with a screening of two short films created by local independent filmmaker Rex Dean. The first, "The Adventures of Space Baby and Metal Man" (2004), is a locally-produced children's sci-fi film. It will be followed shortly thereafter by the premier of a comedy film noir short, "The Interpretator" (2005). The Sunday film showing begins at 6:30 p.m. Tickets are available for $10 at the Somerville Theater box office. According to Daly, invading flying saucers and alien-mating calls aside, what makes the festival really exciting are the people who attend, year after year. "One of the things that's hard to impart to folks about this event is what a wonderful community this is," Daly said. "There are people who come here who don't see each other except for one day each year and there are all sorts of quirky things that the crowd do. Sometimes you never know if something like that will come out of it. "And that's really what the fun is, it's really a community coming together and enjoying this particular genre of film. It's kind of special."


The Setonian
News

Police Briefs

Altercation ensues between two employees A conflict between two employees in the Facilities Department occurred in a parking lot located on Boston Avenue on the afternoon of Tuesday, Feb. 8. The incident, reported to the Tufts University Police Department (TUPD) at 4:38 p.m. on the same day, occurred when one of the employees leaving work realized that his vehicle was blocked by another employee's vehicle. The second employee, who was arriving to work at the time, had double-parked his vehicle. Once the departing employee confronted the other, a small argument ensued and words were exchanged. Reportedly, one employee eventually pushed the other. The victim filed a complaint and the incident remains under investigation. According to TUPD Sergeant Richard McConaghy, officers "very seldomly see altercations between employees."Vandalism occurs in WilsonOn the morning of Saturday, Feb. 12, at 12:47 a.m. a Wilson House dorm room door was reported to have been smashed in. Reportedly, there was no damage to the room itself and no objects were stolen from the room. At the time of the incident, the resident was not in the room. Upon reporting to the scene, officers contacted and notified the student of the vandalism.The door, which is estimated to be worth approximately $200, was subsequently repaired. While there are no suspects, the case remains under investigation by the Tufts University Police Department (TUPD).Latin Way party under violation A loud party in Latin Way was brought to an end by the Tufts University Police Department (TUPD) on the morning of Sunday, Feb. 13, at 3:03 a.m. After TUPD officers received a complaint, they entered the apartment in question to find an unspecified number of students at a party. Other than noise regulations, the tenants also violated other University rules. Upon entering, officers found that the smoke detectors in the apartment were covered with clear-plastic wrap and tape. Also, a light fixture was covered by a flag. Photographs of these fire code violations were taken at the time of the incident. The party was cleared and the tenants were told that a complaint was filed with Dean of Students Bruce Reitman. The students may also face fines.-- Compiled by Mark Pesavento


The Setonian
News

Travelling Lush

This time last week, your Travelling Lush traveled up to Toronto, Ontario (T.O.), Canada to spend a snowy Chinese New Year with her grandparents. Grandparents are not, however, the best people to have drinks with - at least not my grandparents. Fortunately, I have two friends studying at the University of Toronto (UT). Even better, two other friends from home would also be converging upon T.O. for the weekend. With the five hometown buddies reunited, we naturally gravitated downtown, intent on a good night out. For those readers not familiar with Toronto, it is a very big city. While our two hosts Jon and Maxine may attend UT, they are at a campus out in Hamilton, a good hour and a half away from downtown T.O. Thus, despite the presence of the two "locals", and my habit of regularly swinging by to visit gramps, we don't actually make it downtown all that much. So that night, we found ourselves at a bit of a loss, wandering the streets. "Do we want to go there?" "Nah, just look at those people lined up ... they look too sketchy. The place probably is too." "What about that one then? They're dressed nicely." "Yeah, but look at that line!" "Oh, just say you have a table, show some cleavage and flash a smile at the bouncer." Hmm ... too cold for that. We needed to pick up the pace a bit. There is no easier way to lose the rhythm of a night than wandering around in the bitter cold. The last time I had gone out for a serious night on the town was over a year ago, when I was in town with several Boston friends. We had a blast then and I figured that we could retrace our footsteps, and voil?  - an easy repeat of a great night. Tsk tsk. Some of my brain cells, frightened by the cold, must have gone into hibernation. I forgot the one rule that holds constant within the universal night life scene: Never expect things to remain the same. Ever. In a world where bars, clubs, lounges - anything open past midnight - constantly change management and names, or attempt to re-invent themselves, the hot spots never remain in the same place for more than a couple of months at a time. Eager for a place to go, I lit up when we passed a place I enjoyed the last time I had been here: Liquid. Or that's what it was called last year, anyway. It was a relatively small place, no bigger than 33 Restaurant & Lounge back here in Boston, with two rooms: one that played hip-hop, and another that played latino/trance music (depending on the time of night.) The crowd was good, drinks were delicious, and the atmosphere was on. Or that's how I remembered it to be, anyway. Instead, we walked into a half-empty club. But we had already paid the $10 (Canadian dollars) cover charge - I crossed my fingers and hoped that the sparse crowd was reflective of it being early (11 p.m.). People did begin to flow in after another half hour. Unfortunately, they were most definitely not the same crowd I remembered from my night out with fellow Bostonians a year earlier. As the hip-hop room filled up, I noticed a line of big, angry-looking men in leather jackets towards one side of the room. After getting my drink from the seriously disgruntled female bartender, I peered over the shoulder of the big snarling man closest to me, searching the crowd for my friends. Something else caught my eye, however: another row of big angry men were lined up towards the other end of the room. I walked around the entire operation - I went through the trance room and emerged back on the opposite side of the hip-hop room where my friends were. Back with more comfortable company, I took a sip of my vodka lime. It was awful. It wouldn't even pass as a good sugar-candy drink. Jon, seeing the face I made, took my drink back to the bartender. He came back with no success, however, as they measure each drink out strictly by the shot glass. One shot per drink. It's generally not a good sign when the bartenders at a club follow such strict recipes. When stuck in a club that has such a policy, stick with shots or beer (but who drinks beer at a club?). After downing a few shots of horrendous tequila, we hit the dance floor with renewed vigor. A few intimidating men and bad drinks aside, the music was still good. When out in the safety of the brisk night air, we relished the thought of having left without pissing anyone off with our shoes, stance, or choice of shirt. So, boys and girls, remember those great nights you had out while abroad for the semester or summer in Spain, Talloires, Chile, or wherever? Well, if you decide to go back to visit your host families or old friends, don't expect to hit up the same hole in the wall you used to frequent. More than likely, the delinquents or under-aged kiddies from the pub have taken over, or perhaps it has been shut down altogether. It's worth the time to bring yourself up to date during the daylight hours beforehand.


The Setonian
News

Top Ten | Reasons to watch the men's basketball team play

For those of you who have long since given up on Tufts' athletics, here's a ray of hope: the men's basketball team has clinched a home berth for the first two rounds of the NESCAC postseason tournament. The Jumbos' first-round game will be against Colby at Cousens Gym at 3:00 p.m. on Saturday, and here are the top 10 reasons to get out of bed and pack the stands.10. Be that guy. You know which one: the really obnoxious fan everyone says is annoying but secretly loves.9. How else will you know whether Reggie's sporting the full 'fro or the A.I. cornrows?8. Come see a team that has an even lamer mascot than the Jumbos. Seriously, do white mules even exist?7. In case you haven't been to any men's games yet, they're ridiculously fun to watch. Their style is vaguely reminiscent of the '02 St. Louis Rams. The Jumbos lead the NESCAC in points per game and are last in points allowed. 6. Forget the Cameron Crazies, here come the Medford Maniacs, Jumbo Junkies, Gantcher Groupies, Cousens Crackheads? (ok, maybe not, but we can dream.)5. For those of you who don't leave the dorm without your jeans neatly tucked into your Uggs, we promise it's totally ok to wear brown and blue together on Saturday.4. Jumbo fans can be downright creative, not to mention nasty. Last Friday against Trinity, chants of "Go back to New Jersey" to then-NESCAC player of the week Tyler Rhoten echoed throughout Cousens. Next came a chorus of "Safety school." (Umm, a little hypocrisy there? We didn't want to go Ivy League. We swear.)3. Baseball hasn't started yet. Football's over. The NHL canceled the season. The NBA's boring, and you don't get ESPN. It's time we all started coming around to Tufts sports.2. The team has never been ranked as high as No. 2 in the history of the NESCAC. If the Jumbos can pull it off, winning the tournament would earn the team an automatic bid in the Div. III National Championships as well as bring some serious pride to the Hill.1. A 75-year-old fieldhouse full of screaming fans, bouncing balls, and shrill whistles is exactly what the doctor ordered for your hangover.-- By Liz Hoffman, Jessica Genninger and Dave Pomerantz


The Setonian
News

Dennis Doyle | The Brunson Burner

The criteria for winning the NBA MVP are not an exact science. Sometimes the award recipient is about as logical as the Knicks' selection of seven-foot Frederic Weis in the '99 draft. Clearly, the award has a historical precedent for not going to the best player in the league. Why? Because it would not be interesting if it came down to Tim Duncan or Kevin Garnett every year. What is most important is the performance of a player's team, especially if his team is in the midst of a dramatic turnaround. Duncan is not being talked about much because his consistency becomes downright boring to the media. Garnett is not being talked about because his Wolves are floundering. The player that is being talked about is the floppy-haired point guard in Phoenix. If the season ended at the All-Star break, Steve Nash would in all likelihood be the league MVP. The turnaround of the Suns has been the main motive in MVP discussions involving Nash. Dallas owner Mark Cuban let Nash walk without compensation, a blunder that makes you think Cuban should reconsider that management position at Dairy Queen. After signing him as an unrestricted free agent, Phoenix has risen from the doldrums of the NBA on pace to break the record for wins in a season. Scoring an average of 109 points per game, the Suns were cruising with a record of 31-5 until Nash went down in a Jan. 14 game against Indiana. They then dropped their next four games, averaging 86 points per game. Without Nash, Phoenix's high octane offense sputtered like a '91 Chevy Nova. With Nash back, the Suns have gone 10-3, scoring an average of 118 ppg. So obviously the moral is that if you are an MVP candidate looking to improve your chances, get hurt. An MVP award for Nash would be nothing short of astounding. Almost every player who won the honor has been among the scoring leaders in the league. With an average of 15.5 points per game, Nash would have the lowest scoring average of an MVP since Wes Unseld in 1969. Unseld averaged 13.8 points to go with 18.2 rebounds in his rookie season, becoming the only player to win the MVP and Rookie-of-the-Year award in the same year. Nash would have the third lowest scoring average among league MVPs behind Unseld and Bill Russell. Russell averaged only 14.1 points in the '64-'65 season, but was chiefly recognized for his defensive dominance during the Celtics dynasty. Scoring has never been what Nash is about, though. Since John Stockton retired, Nash has assumed the role of premier passing point guard in the NBA, averaging a league-leading 11 dishes a game. Assists, though, are a stat dependent upon teammates, and Nash would not be putting up such glamorous passing numbers without the likes of Amare Stoudamire, Shawn Marion, and Quentin Richardson. Stoudamire is having an absolute breakout season with Nash at the point, averaging 26 points a contest, good for fourth in the league. If you are going to consider Nash for the award, it would be ridiculous to leave Amare Stoudamire, Nash's running mate, out of the argument. In a lot of ways, Nash's popularity in terms of MVP speculation has been a matter of fortunate circumstance. People look at the Suns and see a team that went through a New Jersey-esque transformation when Kidd went to the Nets. The Suns finished the '03-'04 season at 29-53 the second worst record in the Western Conference. They have already eclipsed that win total this season. So, when the insightful basketball pundits in the media see a team that has gone through such a dramatic positive change, they look for its impetus. Marion and Stoudamire were both around last year, and Richardson is good but not great, so they turn to Nash. That logic is sound, but it does not take into account a lot of other factors. For one, Stoudamire was hurt for the start of last season, which caused management to concede the season and trade their star point guard, Stephon Marbury, for a lot of luggage that's only good for creating cap space. Essentially, Stoudamire's injury led to Phoenix mortgaging their season for a chance to create cap room in hopes of signing Kobe Bryant. Not only did the Suns return a healthy, developing Stoudamire this season, but they added Quentin Richardson, a very good shooting guard previously buried in Clipper-land. Clearly, Nash isn't the only reason for this team's turnaround. Still, you could point to the stretch of the season where Nash missed four games and Phoenix stumbled. What that proved more than anything is the lack of depth on this Phoenix team. An injury to either Marion, Stoudamire or Nash would be devastating to this team, which arguably has the worst bench in the league. It just so happened, though, that Nash was the one who got hurt, the team struggled, and Nash looked even more valuable. It's hard to draw the line between productivity and "value" when considering MVP honors. It is a fickle award. But it is an award heavily affected by trends and dramatic, often unexpected success. No team has had a better story than Phoenix, and the new man running that stellar offense is Steve Nash.


The Setonian
News

Inside the MLB | Big spending won't buy Tigers a Ring

A lot of strange transactions occur during Major League Baseball's off-season, but the acquisition of Magglio Ordonez from the Chicago White Sox by the Detroit Tigers has to win the award for stupidest off-season move this year. "Inside the American League" has been hard on Ordonez's agent, Scott Boras, but whatever magical spell he uses to make owners go temporarily insane certainly works wonders. The Tigers, for reasons unknown, decided to offer the 31-year-old outfielder a five year, $75 million dollar contract. Ordonez's OPS numbers for the past three seasons have declined to the form of .978, .926, .836. In addition to his waning production, Ordonez hasn't played in a game since June of last season thanks to knee injuries. He had two surgeries in the off-season.Sounds like a good investment. There is a provision in the contract that will allow the Tigers to escape from the contract if Ordonez spends more than 25 days this season on the disabled list, but the deal still doesn't make sense. When you start to compare Ordonez's annual salary (about $15 million) with that of far superior players like Carlos Beltran (about $17 million), it looks even worse. There were clues earlier in the off-season that the folks running the Tigers might be a bit off their rocker. One of the first off-season free agent signings occurred when the Tigers inked closer Troy Percival from the Anaheim Angels for two years at $12 million. Again, this contract just made no sense. Percival is 35 years old and in 2003 he was plagued with a degenerative hip condition, and in 2004 he missed an entire month with shoulder stiffness. In addition, his strikeout rate dropped steeply in '04. Add to all this the fact that the last thing a mediocre team needs is an expensive closer. So what's going on here? The strategy of spending tons of money on free agents is rarely productive, but there are certain times where it can make at least some sense. The New York Mets may have spent money like drunken sailors this winter, but they do have a small hope of winning the World Series. That's not to say they made all the right moves this off-season, but if Pedro Martinez dominates, if Mike Piazza is healthy, if Beltran is at the top of his game, etc., then maybe the Mets can pull it off. What about the Tigers? There are no ifs; it's just not happening. Sorry Tigers fans, but Detroit isn't winning the World Series this year, or next year. You need something called starting pitching, and Detroit doesn't have nearly enough. One has to wonder what the Tigers are trying to do, because Inside the AL certainly cannot figure it out. The Tigers do have an outside shot at winning the Central Division. But who cares? If they do win the division, people will say to them the same thing people will tell whoever wins the Atlantic Division in the NBA: "Congratulations, you still stink." Detroit's off-season transactions are especially bizarre considering the Tigers' President, Dave Dombrowski, is highly regarded. Dombrowski had a lot to do with the Florida Marlins winning the World Series in 2003 right after he left for the Tigers job. Perhaps their owner, Mike Ilitch, is pulling a Steinbrenner and taking over the team? Maybe the Tigers' management is delusional and really thinks the team has a chance to win this season? If you look at what their owner says, apparently this is the answer! "After our disastrous season [43-119 in 2003], I made up my mind, we've got to build a championship team," owner Mike Ilitch told the Detroit News. "The farm system still isn't developed, but I can't wait around. The city doesn't want to wait around, either. I've got to do everything in my power - I have to extend myself, and keep extending myself." "Inside the AL" will offer a little free advice to teams like the Tigers. If you want to win, build up your farm system as much as possible, make a few shrewd waiver claims, and then when you have a strong group of young players, then spend the money on free agent players to fill in a few needs. It doesn't work the other way around - Isiah Thomas might be able to tell you something about that.


The Setonian
News

Theater Preview | Humanity of 'Monster' revealed at Balch

If Halloween were an existential holiday, it would take the form of Neal Bell's "Monster." Opening tonight in the Balch Arena Theatre, the play elaborates on Mary Shelley's classic Frankenstein tale by illuminating both the beauty and the horror of human existence. The story follows Victor Frankenstein, a man intent on discovering a remedy for death and an explanation for life. Through his curiosity, he awakens a creature into a world of pain and longing, where the environment is hostile and human connection is rare. Actress Jess Bauman describes the show in terms of, "man trying to become God in conquering death." The play explores man in the role of God as well as monster, animal and sexual object, treating the audience to uncomfortable scenes of murder, deprivation and romance. The result is brilliant and haunting. Most of the show is told as Victor Frankenstein's flashbacks. He opens the story with a kind of warning, saying, "Then, maybe I should tell you my story because I think I can make you afraid." The play uses powerful prose, specific acting, and unnerving physicality to create gripping fear within its audience. In describing the emotional dynamic of the show, director Laurence Senelick said, "There is something going on that makes you terribly, terribly nervous." Indeed, "Monster" is an anxiety-producing thriller in the way it blatantly and unapologetically confronts the common human fascination with death, and the things that may or may not lie beyond it. At the same time, the play is not reduced strictly to horror. Instead, the story is riddled with themes of death, sexuality, aggression, and spirituality that bring to life a kind of psychological thrill-ride through the raw parts of the human mind. To embody Frankenstein's monster, actor Christopher Bonewitz draws upon the script's themes of, "loneliness, isolation, and the need for people to make a connection." These characters range from the sad, violent monster to Victor's sexually ambivalent best friend Clerval. As a result, none of the characters in Bell's script invoke apathy from the audience, yet none are entirely familiar either. The play is highly technical, deliberate, and distinct in its design. The stage itself is stark and elegant, like one might imagine the world of Jane Austen's nightmares or the psyche of Salvador Dali. It serves as a ship, a desolate landscape, a home, a cellar, and a forest. The disjointedness of its design instantly evokes tension and uneasiness. Shroud-like fabric hangs from the top of the arena as the stage funnels into an off-centered grate. To quote Neal Bell's script, it feels as though, "no one could live here." As the actors play out their convincing reality, the world of "Monster" comes to look like a Victorian palace that has long since descended into the sewers. Over the next two weekends, "Monster" hopes to deliver a disturbing performance, possibly revealing life to be just as inescapable and overwhelming as death. "Why does the spark go out?" asks Victor Frankenstein. Only "Monster" knows.


The Setonian
News

Saj Pothiawala | The Saj of Tao

Ah, VD. No, not venereal disease, but something very closely related: Valentine's Day. For those of us in the non-communist and non-Jehovah's Witness world, VD came and went several days ago, and to those of you who spent the day with your better half, I say, "Fudge You." Fudge you, Cupid. Fudge you, Hallmark. And most importantly, fudge you, ugly, uninteresting dude who lived down the hall from me sophomore year and for some God-awful reason managed to have an impossibly hot girlfriend. Seriously, the guy was a mess. The only '80s television analogy I can make is Cousin Larry Appleton from "Perfect Strangers." Remember how his girlfriend, Jennifer, was so much hotter than him? And before you say something like, "It's not all about looks, you know. What's on the inside counts too, you shallow so-and-so," I must remind you that Cousin Larry was a HUGE ass. He consistently took advantage of the well-intentioned yet simple-minded Balkai Bartokomous. Consistently. He would have been the least moral character on the show were it not for Gorpley, their conniving boss at the newspaper. As a tangent to my tangent, do you remember that episode where they were locked in the basement and it started to flood when the water main broke? As a six-year-old I was pretty sold on the concept, but really, how long would it take to fill a two-story basement? Half a day at least. And the door at the top of the stairwell didn't seem like it was made of the strongest materials. Do not try to tell me that a goat herder for Mypos, who in the opening credits traveled all the way to Chicago atop a bale of hay on a horse-drawn cart, couldn't lower his shoulder and pop it off the hinges. But enough about "Perfect Strangers" (I hope the six of you who read that and knew what I was talking about appreciated it). Back to VD! The ugly dude was, and probably still is, a complete Larry Appleton: he had no redeeming qualities, yet he enjoyed a healthy relationship with an inexplicably attractive girl. So fudge him. And no, I am not bitter. I am simply using him to make aware my feelings on VD: it's not for me. You heard me, no VD for me, no sir. And for the rest of you singles out there, this is your anthem, so get your gosh-darn hands up. No VD for me because St. Valentine was a Catholic martyr who, in the third century A.D., refused to deny Christ and was subsequently sentenced to death by the Roman Emperor. Romantic, isn't it? Make sure you think of that next time you purchase a $15 heart-shaped box of chocolates, which will inevitably be next year. No VD for me because I am convinced that the greeting card and florist industries in this country are involved in an elaborate conspiracy to take my money. For example, a dozen roses costs like 80 bajillion dollars nowadays. Considering that half of all men in America probably succumb to the pressure of buying roses every Feb. 14, the total revenue generated for the American florist industry on that one day is roughly six billion bajillion dollars. Six billion bajillion! Now, I may not be good with numbers, but that's such a staggering amount I'm not even sure it exists! Lastly, no VD for me because I have a horrible VD track record. Last year I spent most of the night trying to get back to my "valentine" by navigating the far reaches of London's East End on foot after missing the bus. Why was I in the far reaches of London's East End, you ask? Because for some reason I thought it prudent to run off to some house party. I slept alone that night. And the year before that, the Casanova in me decided to take my date out to dinner and a movie. Only the movie the idiot in me chose was "Daredevil." Nothing screams romance like a 90 minute crapfest based on a comic book character whose superpowers were essentially limited to blindness and the power to work as a pro-bono lawyer. He was armed only with a billy club, and for those of you not familiar with comic book weaponry, a billy club is just a stick. A stick. Can you imagine what that's like in front of other superheroes? Spiderman's got those cool web-shooters, Captain America has a shield, Iron Man has a freaking awesome suit, and what do you have? A stick? I mean, what do you say? It's gotta be embarrassing, especially in the machine shop. Iron Man's working on his thrusters, Spidey's researching a stronger polymer to better the integrity of his webbing, Batman's installing a DVD player in his utility belt, and what is Daredevil doing? Breaking a branch off a tree and whittling it down? Dorky comic book knowledge aside, I spent the entire 45-minute trip back from the theater defending an indefensible movie. I slept alone that night. So this year I gave up. No VD for me. Strike that, no VD for us, the ones who took the opportunity on Monday to just go about our business as usual. I went to class, did some laundry, made myself a sandwich, and almost punched a girl I saw carrying flowers. Just a regular Monday. I'm proud to say that this year, my 21st on this planet, I was VD-free. The question is, were you?


The Setonian
News

Inside it's hot, outside it's cold, and there is still a war in Iraq

The above statements are all things you can probably figure out without the help of some kid who has taken it upon herself to write a Viewpoint in the Daily. Nonetheless, these are things I have been thinking about lately, and I will now subject you to my mind's idle wanderings, should you choose to continue reading. The most inflammatory statement from my headline is that it is hot inside. I don't know if you have noticed, but as you walk around campus it seems that all the windows are open and yet, it is February. Inside people are wearing short sleeves, even shorts. As a bead of perspiration runs down the side of my face I cannot help but think - what an immense waste of energy and money! No wonder Tufts tuition, like oil prices, is high and rising. We at Tufts University are living in an inferno. The hypocrisy of all this is what really bothers me. Tufts has an Institute for the Environment (TIE), which has pledged to meet the stipulations of the Kyoto Protocol, regardless of whether or not America ever dares to sign the treaty (which I dare say, will not be any time soon). Since pledging to meet the Kyoto Protocol, TIE has worked to reduce energy use across campus through everything from the director's use of a hybrid car to a halogen light-bulb exchange program. I commend the institute's efforts, but I have a question - Why is the heat kept so high in the dorms? This is a waste of energy that is needless, but, sadly, representative of broader attitudes toward energy consumption on this Campus, in the city, New England, and the nation. It takes significant effort to change these attitudes and habitually energy-inefficient practices, such as turning off your computer when you are not at home or asleep. But, is it really so hard to turn down the heat? Out on the street it is nothing but C-O-L-D (except for the rare warm days, like Tuesday). That said, I cannot help but be relieved that this year has had some semblance of a "normal" Bostonian winter. Why, you ask, do I like the low temperatures, the snow, and the freezing wind-chill? I like it because it enables me to avoid thinking about one of the scariest facts confronting my future, our future. No, it is not what I am going to do when I graduate in May. I am thinking about global warming and climate change. Yes, you've heard it all before, but do you really comprehend what it entails? It entails uncertainty, as the future always does, but on a more precarious scale. Humans are incredible. We can adapt to changing circumstances in the blink of an eye, but most plants, animals, and glaciers cannot. Because of this, extinction rates have reached an all-time high and glaciers that were solid structures 20 years ago are disappearing. But what does this mean for everyday life? Yesterday, the Boston Globe reported on a study indicating that "by the end of this century, global warming threatens to raise the sea level enough that a heavy storm would send flood waters into Boston's downtown waterfront, the Financial District, and much of the Back Bay." If it entails flooding in one of America's most prosperous, modern cities, imagine what it means for people across the world, animals in the rainforest, and plants on the arctic tundra. Even the coldest New England day is not enough to keep these thoughts from my head. And there is still a war in Iraq. Some may argue that the war was over long ago, some would prefer I call it an occupation. Regardless of the terms used, the conflict in the region has not abated. If I were writing this for a class, I would now link the oil in our radiators and the changing global temperatures to the war in Iraq by talking about oil, motives for war, and international politics. But, you can make these connections yourself. Instead, I have two comments to make on the subject. First, I encourage Tufts students who are talking about Iraq, about the Bush administration, and about America to take note- you attend a liberal university in New England. You and your friends may perceive America to be out in left field and enjoy bashing the right-wing response. But, I challenge you to broaden your viewpoint. Talk with someone who disagrees with you and talk about politics. Or at least play devil's advocate during a conversation. This does not necessarily mean that you should change your stance and it does not mean that you should persuade the token-conservative on this campus that they are dead wrong. All it means is that even in New England we have to remember that not everyone is a die-hard liberal. Engaging in conversation with "the opposition" may be a risky thing to do, but it is more productive than patting yourself on the back for being a good liberal. Second, educate yourself. This may be what you are here to do at college, maybe not. Regardless, read the paper, surf the web, turn off the TV. To have an opinion is one thing, to have an informed opinion is quite another. That said, the annual EPIIC symposium is coming up February 24th-27th and this year's topic is "Oil and Water." You can probably think of more fun ways to spend your weekend - but try to think of something more educational and relevant to your everyday life. From your current life in an inferno, to your future career as ruler of the universe (or broke, perpetual student), oil and water run the world. So, you might as well know something about it.


The Setonian
News

O, that this too fattened flesh would melt...

As I walked into the bathroom in Health Services, I noticed a poster on the wall. "Does she say she'll do anything to lose weight?" it read, "Do you feel like you're losing [your friend] to an obsession?" Other quotes of a similar nature could be found all over it. At the bottom was a contact number for people who suspect their friends might be suffering from an eating disorder. Posters like this are all over the Tufts health and athletics facilities, and I am confident that they can be found in similar locations on campuses all across the country. There is a widespread focus at institutions of learning and in the media on the prevention of eating disorders. This focus is extremely important, and the problems of anorexia and bulimia should never be trivialized. However, some of the concepts that accompany the prevention of eating disorders can serve as an excuse for people to be overly accepting of their own issues with being overweight or obese. I recently saw an interview on CNN about a woman who had written a book about celebrating her body in its entire overweight splendor. In the book, she encouraged overweight and obese women everywhere to do the same. Her rhetoric was based on being comfortable with one's own body and not working to change it. She apparently refuses to acknowledge that there is something wrong with the United States having the highest obesity rate of any nation in the world. In most states, at least one quarter of the population is clinically obese. In some, that fraction is as much as one third. Heart disease, often stemming from obesity and improper nutrition, is the number one cause of death in the country. As frequently as statistics like these are reported, they are ignored to an even greater extent. This is because they have not received the same kind of cultural stigma attached to disorders like anorexia and bulimia. The problems of being overweight and obese can often stem from eating disorders as well, but of a different kind. The prevalence of these disorders and the detrimental effects of obesity need to receive the same kind of attention currently afforded to the more well-known disorders. Tufts could certainly do more to encourage awareness of this issue. While posters like the one I described earlier adorn our health facilities and provide a sense of emotional guidance, our dining halls are filled with pizza, burgers, and fried food. If the main entr?©e is bad, and the vegetarian option looks no better, what do you do? I know that for the past six months (the extent of my residence here at Tufts), my friends and I have headed straight for a few slices of that oh-so-delicious but toxically fatal white-cheese-and-tomato pizza, accompanied by a plateful of shoestring or Cajun fries. It is not enough to simply provide students with the healthy option at Dewick, or to have an adequate (though by no means spectacular) athletics facility. The University needs to take a more active role in improving awareness of the epidemic proportions and intensely dangerous effects of a lifestyle that results in being overweight or obese. Perhaps if Surgeon Generals' warnings were placed in front of the piles of fries, burgers, and pizza, or if taxes were levied on those unhealthy culprits, then people might be more aware of the detrimental nature of consumption. These are of course, facetious examples. It is not my duty, but that of a responsible collegiate administration, to decide what policies would best serve this end. When I arrived at Tufts, I took part in the F.I.T. pre-orientation program. I learned what to eat, what not to eat, how much to exercise, and many of the basic tenets of a healthy lifestyle. However, since leaving that program, I have had no additional guidance. Any such service is one that I would have to seek out, and my busy schedule has left little time for that. Instead, the culture that has so recently endorsed the idea of being accepting of one's own body has made it easy for me to neglect those insights. I am not saying that every overweight person should have a deep sense of self-loathing and inadequacy, and I am aware that in some situations no amount of exercise or healthy eating can solve what may be a genetic or biological problem. However, people should be told that while it is all well and good to be comfortable with one's overweight body, one should not simply accept it, but try to improve it. Work out, eat well, and get lots of sleep. Both are clich?© and easier said than done, but essential to maintaining a healthy state of both the body and the mind. I have gained 15 pounds since I reached Tufts last September. While I am still comfortable with myself, this article is my pledge not to accept my newly acquired poundage, but to fight to get my body to a place where I am not only comfortable, but fit and healthy as well.


The Setonian
News

TCU Senate resolution on academic freedom passes

The Tufts Community Union (TCU) Senate passed a resolution on Sunday that called for students to have the ability to conduct coursework without fear of ideological discrimination. The resolution was introduced by the Tufts Academic Freedom Project (TAFP), a sub-group of the Tufts Republicans. According to the resolution and its amendments, students should be able to conduct coursework without fear of ideological discrimination by their superiors and faculty should be committed to providing a forum for multiple viewpoints regarding unsettled issues. The amendment also said that hiring and firing process for faculty should be free from ideological discrimination. "Although instructors are allowed to express their own personal views, they are serving as educators in the classroom, not as advocators of their personal ideology," TCU Senator freshman Diler Erdengiz said. "Therefore, it is important to communicate to the students that there is an alternative view and that the professor has no problem with discussing these alternative view[s]." The resolution passed with near unanimity. Not all senators were content with TAFP's presentation, however. "The failure of [Balkind] and anyone else in his group to present even one case where a liberal student was allegedly discriminated against by a conservative professor caused me to wonder whether or not there was a larger political motivation at play here than [Balkind] and others let on," TCU Parliamentarian sophomore Brody Hale said. The majority of the Senate was supportive. "Academic freedom is the life blood, the heart, of the University," TCU Senator senior Matt Pohl said. "This resolution upholds and highlights the values sought after by Tufts faculty, administration, and students," TCU Senator sophomore Andrew Caplan said. "[It includes] values that uphold equality in the classroom regarding ideas, ideologies and opinions." Pohl explained the reasoning behind the controversy of such a resolution. "It is very inappropriate for a professor to deliberately grandstand or to personally attack those who think differently," he said. "An opinion that may cause debate in the classroom can be very beneficial so long as the classroom can serve as an open forum for all opinions." "Providing a forum for the students to discuss multiple viewpoints regarding unsettled issues is very important in that it gives students the comfort and safe environment in which to express their opinions even if their opinions do not necessarily coincide with those of the instructor," Erdengiz said. Balkind said that the resolution's passage was a significant victory for the TAFP in creating awareness about the condition of academic freedom on campus, which he perceives to be in jeopardy. The TAFP had requested a similar appeal during a Senate meeting last year but the Executive Board of the Senate, chose not to vote on TAFP's appeal because it was too closely tied to national legislation. According to Baumwoll, recent TCU presidents have been wary of involvement in issues closely tied to national discussion. "We were elected solely on our feelings and our stances on issues here at Tufts, not about national issues," Baumwoll said. "We don't have the authority to make decisions about such national issues," Baumwoll said that because TAFP changed its resolution to be in accordance with the Tufts Policy on Academic Freedom since its Spring 2004 attempt, it was deemed appropriate for Senate review. The Senate's vote on the resolution, however, merely represented a show of student support and affirms the Senate's position on an issue. "While our resolutions do enable students on campus the leverage power of having the TCU Senate's stamp of approval on an issue, they do not enact actual legislation," Caplan said. Balkind said that members of the TAFP are actively working with professors to discuss teaching practices, their effects on students, and the implications of reform on the faculty's own academic freedom. "The resolution's passage will be a means of starting conversations about this issue across campus," he said. According to Balklind, TAFP's objectives extend beyond the passed resolution. "A lot of [professors] are interested and would like to talk to us about it," he said. Balkind said he envisions there to be a forum for faculty held sometime after spring break.