Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

The power of a word

Profanity has no place in public, even if it is used in an effort to remove the power of the word to cause hurt. The Federal Communications Commission has included "c**t" among the seven words banned from use on television and radio, and journalistic style guides dictate that we not even print it in this editorial. While many of the words on this list have become common and weak in use, c**t continues to be a divisive and hurtful word. It is specifically harmful to women, as it is strongly derogatory about female sexuality. We should not be afraid of the word and entirely ban its use, however. Attempts to reinvest it with a positive connotation are worthwhile, but that does not mean that it should be loosely bantered about in the hope that one day it will become acceptable and funny. Chalking and postering "c**t" around campus are not appropriate because the word still has the ability to insult women. The students who did these chalkings were not wrong in their goals, but their methods were far from ideal. If a student was upset enough that she complained, a more respectful and better method could have been found to advertise the event. The shock method used in the campus chalkings is only appropriate at closed events, such as the "Vagina Monologues," where an attendee will have an idea of what she is getting into, and will be surrounded by a crowd sympathetic to the cause. Those who wish to defuse the word, but want to reach out to a greater public than the audiences at the "Vagina Monologues," have many options available, some of which can reach just as many people. A well-written viewpoint, an intellectual discussion, a serious debate over the meaning and use of the word, and a play are all decent forums in which to discuss the word, use the word, and ultimately render it harmless. Cite the word from its use by James Joyce, or place it alongside an image of Judy Chicago's female-centered art. It is only through the use of the word in appropriate venues and contexts that those who wish to defuse its negative connotations will be successful.


The Setonian
News

Pros and cons of Tufts times two

Last week, Part 1 of "Becoming A Double Jumbo" explored admissions advantages to staying at Tufts for graduate studies. This week covers the student perspective -- the pros and cons of staying on the Hill. Josh Ries graduated from Tufts with a Political Science degree in 1999, and like many seniors, was unsure of what to do next. He realized that he did not want to go to law school, and decided, with advice from his parents (his dad is a dentist), to join the health profession. After a little over a year of science courses at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Ries returned to Massachusetts and to Tufts at the School of Dental Medicine. He is president of the American Student Dental Association and graduates this May as a Double Jumbo. Like Ries, many undergraduate students are interested in attending Tufts graduate schools and programs for several reasons -- comfort with the city and University, the strong academic reputation, and a positive undergraduate experience. Ries highlights the comfort of not having to move to a new city. "[It was] one less factor to worry about when starting an academic career," he said. "I knew where everything was... so I could get here and hit the ground running." He added that as an undergrad he didn't take advantage of the city enough, often remaining within the "comfy confines of the Medford campus." Attending classes in Chinatown, where the Dental School is located, Ries can now further explore Boston. Senior Branden Yee hopes to become a Double Jumbo at Tufts School of Medicine. He applied for one of the same reasons as Ries-the school's academics. "I believe the attitude of the medical school, or at least my impression, is that it is very dedicated to seeing its students succeed and offers them every opportunity to do so," Yee said. He said that the Medical School remains his top choice, despite the high cost of tuition. According to pre-med advisor Carol Baffi-Dugan, an expensive tuition frequently deters students from becoming Double Jumbos. "Due to the high cost of our health professions schools, a significant number of Tufts alums who are admitted choose not to attend and go to less expensive schools," she said. Ries joked that the high tuition is part of feeling comfortable at the University: "You knew where to send the checks every time, it doesn't change -- Trustees of Tufts College," he said. David Proctor, who currently is enrolled in the Tufts Interdisciplinary Doctorate Program, graduated with a BA in 1994 and a MA in 2001, both from Tufts. He says finances played a role in coming back to Tufts: "I was the recipient of a good financial aid package and a TA-ship which made returning to Tufts for my MA economically feasible," he said. However, Proctor's reason for returning to Tufts twice (making him a Triple Jumbo when he receives his doctorate) is mainly because he enjoys "the possible connection between students and faculty." Proctor looked at other schools before deciding to return to Medford for his master's degree, but was influenced by his first four years at the University. "I really enjoyed my undergraduate years at Tufts and after visiting several other campuses I realized, much as I had done as a pre-frosh years earlier, that the only place I really felt comfortable was at Tufts," he said. Michael Torsiello, a first year masters candidate, graduated with an engineering degree from the University last year and continues his studies on the same campus - in Anderson Hall. Part of his reason for staying at Tufts is the scholarship opportunities available specifically to Tufts undergraduates, which help pay the cost of higher education. Torsiello knew that Tufts is where he wanted to go: he only applied to one school. "I just felt comfortable here and liked the faculty... [I like] knowing what my professors expect," he said. He explained that although he is on the same campus for six years, there is a "different feeling" to being a graduate student. For one, he is a TA and even teaches some of his friends who are now seniors. In addition, Torsiello moved to Malden so that he wouldn't "feel like a college student for another two years." "People who do stay around, depending on where they live, they may feel like an undergrad," he said. He added that his graduate student experience is different because most of his friends from Tufts undergrad have moved away and his relationship with faculty members has changed. "I don't regret it at all," Torsiello said about continuing his education at Tufts. "Sometimes I wonder what it would be like to attend another school, but it's only two years. I don't hate the area... there was no reason for me to leave." Ries admited that while staying at Tufts has resulted in "very few negatives," he does miss out on a different academic experience. "There's something [to be said] about being educated from different perspectives," he said. Despite the incentives and possible advantages to continuing a Tufts education, not everyone finds staying in Medford -- or even Massachusetts -- right for them. Alumna Nara Meli (LA '03) chose not to apply to the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. Instead, she enrolled in New York University's masters program in International Relations. She has no regrets about moving to Manhattan. "Basically, I just wanted to get out of Tufts and come to the big city," Meli said.


The Setonian
News

Yankees Suck

Rough weekend, real rough weekend. Just got back to my room. Brain fried. Still work to do -- a grip of work to do. Test...essay...problem set....probably more. Drank three cups of white tea -- ready for a long night. Oh yeah...sports column. Went to the bathroom. That's where we get together and talk on my floor. Big bathroom. What should the column be on? Only guy there was, the only guy I really wanted. Big Alaskan guy. Huge Alaskan guy. I bet I could get in a punch or two, but if he wanted to, he could clean my clock. His girlfriend was there too -- been here for weeks. I think she has a key by now. Didn't need the girl, but the guy could give me a column. Not 'cause he'd tell me what to write about, but 'cause he'd tell me what not to write about. "What should my column be on?" I asked him. "What should your column be on?" "We're the only two in here -- plus the girl -- and you don't have a column." "Yeah...I don't know...what's going on in the sports world?" Same question I always ask myself. I usually know. But not tonight. "Write about March Madness...ummm...does anybody even care?" he asked. "Maybe some, but not big-time yet." "What is up with this school? What is up with Boston?" he screamed. May have scared the girl. I've asked myself these questions, but never so loudly. "All anybody cares about here are the Red Sox," he says. "What about the Patriots, people cared about them, right?" "Nobody gives a s--t about the Patriots, 'cept for a couple weeks. They're like, 'Big whup, they won the Super Bowl again. How is that gonna help us win the Series?'" Couldn't disagree there. All about the Sox. All about the Sox. Not only that. All about the Yankees. Celtics lose. Yankees suck. Bruins lose. Yankees suck. Pats lose. Yankees suck. Sox lose. Yankees suck. Yankees suck. Yankees suck. Don't have that in Denver. We hate the Raiders. We hate the Red Wings. We hate it that the Rockies have to pitch at high altitude. But we don't blame Nuggets losses on any of those things. Is it just me? Why don't Chowda Heads care about anything except for the Sox? Celtics are in the tank. Bruins are kicking ass. Pats are number freaking one. Who cares? This is the Sox's year. Who else calls a group of fans a nation? Ain't no Grizzlies Nation. Can't just be me. What do kids from other states think? What does Montana think? What does Cali think? What does Upstate-Jersey-Long Island-Connecticut think? Didn't SI do this? Asked subscribers what sports their states cared most about. But they had boring questions. Biggest state rivalry. Everyone knows this. Favorite player. Know this too. Elway could run for governor as a fascist and get 100 percent. Need better questions. Need to ask kids from every state. We have all 50 at this school, right? Tell them to e-mail me. Tell them to answer some questions. Questions like these. Number of months spent caring about which sports. Whose jersey is worth $75. A ______ shouldn't dare cross the border. What they think of Boston fans. That's four. That's short. That's easy. They can even add more if they want. They can rant all they want. I'll probably read it. Have to keep the answers about their state. This'll give me another column. If they e-mail me. They better. Or I may have to spend more bathroom time with that Alaskan and his girlfriend. Columns are hard in a Sox town. Yankees suck. You will reach Brian Loeb at...gasp! Brian.Loeb@tufts.edu.


The Setonian
News

Howe Cup yields mixed feelings at end of season

The women's squash team closed out its season last weekend in the Howe Cup battling its opponents like it has all season long. Playing at Yale University, the Jumbos defeated Smith College 6-3 in the first round on Friday, but fell 8-1 to a tough Middlebury team on Saturday. The women then lost to William Smith on Sunday, 6-3, to close out their season. The William Smith match was a tough one for the Jumbos to swallow. Freshman Jules Avrutin lost in a tight match at the number one spot, (9-7, 9-5, 9-6), and senior tri-captain Leigh Checchio lost in three games at number two. Junior Nicole Arens put up a strong fight at the number three position, but ended up dropping a tense five game match (9-5, 4-9, 7-9, 9-2, 9-4). "I felt I played pretty well," Arens said. "I really started to pick it up in the middle of the match. It was scheduled early so it took me a little time to get it going. Unfortunately my opponent started attacking the front court a little more towards the end and just played a bit better." Senior tri-captain AJ Crane, junior tri-captain Eliza Drachman-Jones, and sophomore Zoe Bolesta all lost in three games at the four, five, and six positions, respectively. Although Tufts dropped the first six matches, it came back strong to win the bottom three. Freshman Liz Thys won in three games at number seven. Sophomore Joelle Polivy also won with relative ease at number eight, and junior Rhonda Barkan was victorious at number nine. Despite the tough loss, coach Doug Eng was proud of his team. "We did play better on Friday and Saturday, but we still played solidly on Sunday against William Smith," he said. "The girls gave it everything they had. You couldn't ask for anything more from them. They should be happy with the way they played." Eng had said before the Middlebury match that the team would have to play almost flawlessly to defeat the Panthers on Saturday. The Jumbos played very well, but it still was not enough to knock off their feisty opponents. Avrutin and Checchio both lost in three games at the top two spots. Arens was involved in another battle, but she lost in four games. Crane and Drachman-Jones also lost in three games. Bolesta was involved in a tight, five-game match, but she couldn't quite eke out a victory. Thys and Polivy lost very close four-game matches at the seventh and eighth positions. Barkan pulled out the lone victory for the Jumbos. "Middlebury just matched up too well against us," Eng said. "There were a lot of close matches; 8-1 was not indicative of how close a match this was." On Friday, Tufts played well enough to beat Smith, 6-3, despite losses in the top two spots. Avrutin ended up losing in five close games while Checchio lost in a four-game match. Though they did not triumph over their opponents, both Avrutin and Checchio showed improvement from their previous meeting with Smith earlier in the season. "Both Jules and Leigh really stepped it up again," Eng said. "We played Smith earlier in the season and both of them played a lot better this time." Arens pulled off an impressive victory at number three, winning in four games. "Nicole also showed a tremendous improvement from last time against Smith," Eng said. "Nicole turned a five game loss last time into a four game win." "I was really happy with my play in the Smith match," Arens said. "Last time I played that opponent I was sort of worn down by an earlier match against Amherst and it was a bit of an upset." Crane fell in four games, but Drachman-Jones picked up the slack, winning at number five. The rest of the Jumbos dispensed of Smith with ease, winning positions six through nine without any Jumbo dropping a game. The Howe Cup marked the end of the season for the women, but Eng was impressed with the way his team handled itself all season, especially after a season-ending injury to number two player Erica Adler. "The girls really stepped it up after Erica's injury," Eng said. "Everyone elevated their play and just played beautiful squash in the last three weeks. They have a lot to be proud of." Arens echoed Eng's positive statements towards the team. "I just thought our team played awesome," she said. "[It] really put forth a strong effort all season long."


The Setonian
News

Who Killed Jesus?

Watch Mel Gibson's new movie, "The Passion of the Christ" and you will see a man crucified. You will see a group of religious leaders, their character insulted and authority threatened, conspire to murder. You will see an arrogant Roman governor so spineless and cruel that he does not listen, even to his own conscience. What you may not notice is a single pair of hands, belonging to Mel Gibson. Mel filmed his own hand driving a nail through the hand of Jesus and into the cross. Why did he do that? We might find our answer if we understand the meaning of the crucifixion itself. It has always, in some way or another, been misunderstood. Those anti-Semites who call for vengeance on all Jews probably understand least of all. They think that they are avenging the death of Christ in their violence and hatred. They assume the crucifixion was a horrible accident, a collision of unforeseen events that ruined Christ's work on earth by a premature death. But that assumption is wrong. In the biographies we have of Jesus, he claims to be "the Son of the Blessed One," and to have existed before his ancestor Abraham was even born. But even more shocking than his claim to be "the man come down from heaven" is his assertion that he left heaven to suffer and to die. In Jesus' own understanding, his primary purpose on earth was not to teach, not to preach, not even to heal. It was to die. Long before any plots are in motion against him, he says that he has come "to give his life as a ransom for many." Far from being ambushed by a cruel fate, Jesus says forcefully, "No one takes [my life] from me, but I lay it down of my own accord." But if it was his choice to die, does that mean no one is to blame? Behind Jesus' purpose to die is another intention that he expresses in different ways. He says he has come to seek out and save the lost and to bring a cure for the sick. He says he has come in this way for all people. These words are fairly insulting in what they imply. If we have to be found, then we do not know where we are or where we are going. If we need life, that means we do not have life -- we are dead, like walking zombies. And if we need a cure, that means there is something deeply wrong with us, something we cannot fix ourselves. We cannot understand what it means to say we are lost, dead and sick, unless we first understand God and his intentions. The God that Jesus reveals exists whether or not people believe in him. Everything else that exists receives its existence from him. Nothing can exist independently from him. This God is also a god who cares. He loves love and hates hate. He cares because he is good; goodness is his very nature, and that nature reveals what is good and what is not. But his goal is not even world peace, as nice as that would be. He did not create people intending to raise an ant farm. He created people for a relationship. And his goal for each person is a union more intimate than marriage. But people got themselves lost. They became fell for a very convincing lie: "God is holding out on me." They did not ask why a being that gave them the gift of existence would withhold any good gift. Suspicious that there was some good thing that God did not want them to have, people went their own way to control their own lives. Unfortunately, if God is the sole Creator of all that exists, then nothing good can exist apart from him. So, as if wanting to be "free" of the limitations of the subway platform, they stepped past the yellow line. But there was no train there. Following an illusion of good, they stepped into Nothingness and died. If we are made to be with God in our inner spirit, then to prefer any other thing over God for our happiness (be it money, power, sex, or anything) is to prefer death over life. Gibson himself admits that even at the height of his fame and success, in his soul he felt an aching void that nothing could fill. Being spiritually dead, people became sick, physically and mentally. Bodies began to decay. Selfishness became the norm, ruining relationships and spreading misery. And worst of all, people came to enjoy being sick. They would rather suffer the effects of their selfishness than to admit they needed God and forfeit their self-sufficiency. "Better to reign in Hell than to serve in Heaven." It was out of his undying love for us rebels that God became man in Jesus of Nazareth, to do what only a God-man could. He left the dignity and comfort of heaven and suffered a dive into the Nothingness, in order to pull mankind out. Fully a man, Jesus did what no one could: live a perfect human life of unbroken intimacy with God. Raised from the dead to a life that will never end, Jesus can share that new human life with whosoever will receive it. Jesus took the death all people deserved to give the life no one deserves. But if we had not sinned, Jesus would not have had to die. This is the understanding that led Gibson to put his own hand crucifying Jesus. He considers himself responsible. Romans may have been the executors, but it was sin that brought Jesus to the cross -- Gibson's sin and everyone else's. The sin of all people, Jew and Gentile, had to be dealt with. Sin is not breaking arbitrary rules, it is telling God to kiss off. Even the "nicest" guy can be content in his own self-righteous niceness, and thus cut off from God. Sin kills. The question has never been whether one is naughty or nice, but whether one is alive or dead. Jesus dealt with sin so sinners could live, be forgiven, and brought home. Jack Grimes is a senior majoring in Philosophy. He can be reached at grimes@tuftsdaily.com


The Setonian
News

From the slums to the red carpet

It's a rare occurrence when a movie made almost two years ago is suddenly nominated for an Oscar. But it's even rarer when the movie in question, a Brazilian film with hardly a word of English in it, is nominated for almost every major Academy award except Best Foreign Film. City of God's rise from total obscurity to a burgeoning hit is nearly as convoluted as its narrative of underworld crime in a Rio de Janeiro slum. Brazilian filmmakers decided not to enter the film as their official selection for the 2003 Academy Awards, making it ineligible for a Best Foreign Film Oscar. Luckily, "independent" moviemakers/"highbrow" Oscar-factory, Miramax, stepped in to release the film domestically, giving the fine folks at the Academy the opportunity to shower it with accolades like any other homegrown spool of celluloid. However, whether it came from a sudden flash of pre-Oscar hype or the leisurely word of mouth that tends to follow a revered cult film, City of God was bound to catch on in America before long. From its kinetic visuals to its violent "Hey kids, crime doesn't pay but it sure is fun to watch"-intertwining storylines, City, despite its foreign origins, will hold its own against any hyper real Tarantino-knockoff at the local multiplex. Told from the point of view of Rocket -- about the only character in the movie who manages to shirk the life of a gangster -- City of God is the story of a low-income district in Rio of the same name. The film begins in a 1960s where the light always appears sepia and the houses neat and orderly, and ends in the 1980s when the City of God has degenerated into a gloomy, neon-colored war-zone. The physical erosion of the city itself closely parallels the rise in violent crime and drug activity on its streets. When the film begins, the only criminals operating in the City of God are three inept hoodlums who rob gas trucks and throw money to the poor. By the 1970s, a blossoming drug trade has split the slum into two rival gangs, causing crime to become an altogether more serious, and hazardous, endeavor. But the film is much more than a simple cautionary tale about the dangers of gang life. City of God has about as much to do with drugs and gangs as Robert Altman's Nashville has to do with country music: both are more concerned with how something like music or crime connects the lives of the strangest people. At its most sprawling, City of God's spider-web of interconnected stories feels as if Gabriel Garcia Marquez rewrote the script to Scarface. There is a plethora of interesting characters wandering rampant through the underworld. Director Fernando Meirelles with screenwriter Braulio Mantovani fill their movie with every minute detail concerning the characters' lives. There's the cold-blooded gang leader Lil Ze, who's the most feared man in the city but can't get a woman to dance with him; his sidekick, Benny, a much-beloved hippy who wants to turn away from his life of crime to live on a farm; Ned, a genuinely nice guy who's dragged into the gang war when his brother is killed; and Rocket himself, a photographer and would-be thief who finds his potential victims too cool to rob. The broad palette of stories is the movie's strongest feature, a feature that any director would be hard-pressed to emulate. The film's foreign origins might have made its trip to the USA a little longer, but they don't diminish its appeal to American audiences.



The Setonian
News

Greeks in a rush to get back on their feet

Tufts' rush this spring is a crucial indicator of the strength of Greek life after its struggles of the 2002-2003 school year. So far the rush has been successful. "We've had more kids than I'd ever seen," Matt Senko, president of Delta Tau Delta (DTD) said. "It was a blast," freshman Bharat Battu, who rushed DTD and Theta Chi, said. This year's rush events ranged from lobster dinners to Hooters restaurant, and presented what the fraternities hope was a variety of contexts to get to know the brothers. "Recruitment is the lifeline of your fraternity," John Kluge, president of Sigma Phi Epsilon (Sig Ep), said. "[New members] are what keep your organization going." The 2002-2003 school year marked a low for Greek life, where involvement was down to 11 percent from an 18 percent high of a few years ago. Multiple negative hazing incidents, which resulted in disqualification of nearly 20 pledges and the probation of three houses, led to increasingly sour relations between fraternities and the Tufts administration. Amid confusion and resentment from fraternity and sorority leaders about the perceived "crackdown" on social life, the administration demanded that the system change. In order to alter the image and influence of the Greek system, Todd Sullivan was hired to fill a new position as Director of Fraternity and Sorority Affairs. Sullivan aimed to bolster the dwindling popularity on campus through open Greek events throughout the fall semester. These included the "Meet the Greeks" barbecue and a block party at the beginning of the school year. "I am here to be a liaison, an advisor, an advocate, yet someone who will help hold them accountable, too," Sullivan said. The efficacy of these events was questionable, however, as attendance was sparse. Greek leaders, however, appreciated the organizational help and concerted effort. "In the past there wasn't really a lot of structure," Delta Tau Delta President Matt Senko said. "It helps to have someone who actually lays out a plan." While Sullivan's policy has had the potential to contribute to publicity, ironically, the fall's dampened social scene may have also led to greater interest in Greek life this spring. "Interestingly enough, being on probation had a reverse effect," Senko said. "Because we had no social events [last semester], kids seemed more intrigued and excited about the house." The Delta Upsilon (DU) and Delta Tau Delta (DTD) fraternities struggled to maintain publicity and name recognition while under social probation from pledge abuses last semester. "Last year was a hard one for many of us," DU President Philip Oates said. "But from what we have seen from the recruitment process, we should have around 15 guys and we should really be on our way back up." Sig Ep also struggled over the past year to increase its popularity and visibility. "[There was] a time when people talked of the house basically folding, but we had a huge spring recruitment. A lot of it is that you want to promote your name on campus and have people hang out at the house. Rush is a way to get all these [interested] people together at once," Kluge said. Sig Ep has so far received "a pretty good turnout", according to Kluge. "A lot of it is quality, not quantity," he said. Sullivan has also worked to minimize pledge hazing and prevent the abuses of last year. The Tufts anti-hazing policy, as well as the Massachusetts hazing law, is now in the Pachyderm in order to "help clarify what is and what is not acceptable." Similarly, Sullivan has assembled handbooks for fraternity and sorority presidents including "positive new member education programs and alternatives to hazing". The Inter-Greek Council will also host a new member education program for on March 7th. A combination of hazing abuses and poor maintenance of their house placed Theta Delta Chi (123) "under a lot of pressure to stay alive," 123 President Shawn Hansberry said. The national chapter and alumni board demanded reformation: a new anti-hazing policy and renovations to the house. The new Pledge Education program, Hansberry said is "more brothers-oriented. We do events with them. Hazing doesn't prove anything about the person." The tone of the house may have changed, Hansberry said, but energy in this spring's pledge class is running high. "I feel we are receiving many more freshmen who share the same idea of joining a house for the people [in] the fraternity and what the house is, rather than just a place to party in," Hansberry said. 123 has joined Tufts' chapter of Zeta Beta Tau (ZBT) in its no-pledging practice. ZBT has not conducted a pledge period since 1989, when its national office mandated that any rushee accepting a bid be initiated within 72 hours. "I know of no one who looks down [on] this," Jay Kim, ZBT treasurer said. "I doubt [people] are deterred from ZBT because of it, but more so attracted. I mean, nobody wants to go through certain aspects of pledging." Though 123's changes to its house certainly points to a trend against hazing, the relational benefits and bonding from the pledge process are still firmly entrenched in fraternity life. "I don't think [the new precautions are] an overreaction," Senko said, acknowledging the legitimacy of hazing concerns and alluding to steps taken by DTD's national organization to standardize the pledge process at eight weeks. "[But] we try to make [the pledge process] so that a lot of the kids become familiar with each other and become united as a group and develop friendships with other kids and people in the house." Despite the bad rap from negative hazing incidents, such as incidents with Zeta Psi's pledges last year that put some in the hospital, rushees agree that the traditional pledge process would not keep them from joining a fraternity. "I'd rather get hazed," freshman Nick Schroback said, who rushed Alpha Epsilon Pi this past week. "It doesn't bother me. Alternatives are definitely cool, [but] it's all about the real frat experience." According to fraternity members, Sullivan's most helpful contribution has been improving the relationship with the administration to lend optimism to the process. "We have a pretty good working relationship. He's been very easy to communicate with, and has been very helpful communicating with our neighbors," Kluge said. "People have told me they are excited about the increase in positive Greek activity on campus, and they want to be a part of that," Sullivan said. "Many students are looking for more than just parties, and they realize that fraternities and sororities offer so much more than just a social outlet. It's about service; about values; about finding a support network for college years and beyond." "It's really the people in both frats and the bonds they have with each other that got me interested in joining" Battu said. "Everyone's really tight with each other. I think the frats here aren't really the same at other stereotypical party schools. They definitely bring different, interesting guys together."


The Setonian
News

Jumbos garner second place at Div IIIs

There was no trophy to hoist at the end of the day, but the women's track and field team left the New England Div. III Championships at MIT with heads held high. The Jumbos (133.50 points) placed second overall behind defending champ Williams (154), giving the Ephs a scare in the process. Amherst (60) was a distant third. "It basically came down to the last two events," coach Kristen Morwick said. "We messed with them, they weren't expecting us to even be close. We had a phenomenal day. We had four facility records [in the 3000, the 600, the 4x400 relay and the 800] and one meet record [in the 800]." Senior quad-captain Jess Trombly led the way with two individual wins. Trombly edged WPI's Lindsay Bulso by 0.02 seconds with a career-best of 8.44 seconds in the 55-meter hurdles. Trombly also slipped on her distance shoes and danced around the track in the 800m to beat Colby's Jessica Minty by a tenth of a second, finishing with a national provisional time of 2:15.58, her third national event of the season. "[Bulso] from WPI ran a hell of a race but Jess nipped her at the line," Morwick said. "Both [of Trombly's] races were tough to win." Fellow senior quad-captain Emily Bersin led three scoring Jumbos in the 600m, winning the event in a personal-best of 1:38.80, 1.5 seconds clear of the pack. Freshmen Kate Makai (1:41.04) and Raquel Abrams (1:41.77) also scored in the tight field, finishing fourth and sixth respectively, with just 1.81 seconds separating second through eighth place. Sophomore Rachel Bloom scored points in both the 200m (26.38 seconds) and 400m (PR of 58.79), finishing third and second respectively. Bloom logged the sixth Jumbo national qualifying entry this season with a provisional mark in the 400m, missing first place by just a tenth of a second. Senior quad-captain Lauren Caputo sacrificed a chance to qualify nationally in the 5000m and instead ran for the team in the 3000m -- an event not featured nationally. The move paid off, with the cross-country star winning the event with a nine-second PR of 10:11.69. "It was a great race. It went out really fast but I was able to stay in the top five," Caputo said. "I slowly caught up to the first girl and beat her on the last lap, so it was pretty exciting. It was a good way to win." Tufts also received big points in the pentathlon, with all three Jumbo competitors scoring with PR's. Sophomore Megan Sears led the field with 3050 points, a 250-point career-best, while junior Melissa Graveley (2809 points) finished third and sophomore Daniela Fairchild fourth with 2743. "[The pentathlon] was phenomenal," Morwick said. "Megan Sears' score is on par with a national qualifier in the heptathlon outdoors, close to what Jess Trombly did in that event last year [finishing third nationally]. We scored 21 points in that event. That was huge." The nation's top Div. III 4x400m team of Trombly, Bersin, Bloom and junior Sika Henry did not chase the Tufts record they set last weekend but got the job done, beating Williams by almost two seconds in 3:59.56. "We weren't trying [for the Tufts record] at all, everyone had already run other events [and was tired]," Henry said. "The 4x400 is just so much fun, we're doing really well at it this year, to be able to not run your best and still easily win [says something]." Henry also tied Colby's Emilie Coulson for third in high jump with a 5-03.75 foot leap, clearing the same height as the first and second-place finishers, but losing out based on an earlier missed attempt at a lower height. "We all had jumped the same height, but because I had that one miss [at a lower height] they placed me third," Henry said. "It was just a matter of luck." Williams and Tufts split hairs in many of the track events. Williams won just two track events, the 1500-and 4x200m relay, but consistently placed amongst the race leaders in most other races to score 88 points, while Tufts scored 114. But the Ephs made up the difference in the field, outscoring Tufts 66 to 19.5. Williams claimed second and third in pole vault, an event uncontested by Tufts, and took first, second and fourth in the triple jump. Jumbo senior Shushanna Mignott countered Williams with a third in long jump (PR of 17-02.25) and a sixth in triple jump (34-07.50), while Trombly added a fourth in long jump (16-11.00). Four of Williams' six shot putters scored, however, and one Eph placed in the weight throw, earning Williams an unchallenged 16 throwing points. "[Mignott] was behind the board on that one, it was a bomb. She really let one go," Morwick said of Mignott's long jump. "But it's tough to score in the throwing events. We had people throw PR's, but Williams is loaded and Bates' [Liz Wanless and Kelly Godsey, one-two finishers in both shot and weight throw] are just phenomenal." Other highlights included freshman Sarah Crispin's second place finish in the 1000 with a career-best 3:02.91. Sophomore Rebecca Ades (18:28.15) qualified for All-New England's with a sixth place in the 5000m, while senior Lauren Dunn (18:44.03) finished eighth in the event. "We chipped away at [Williams]. I had us being maybe within 40 points of them. To be 20 points, if one event had gone wrong for them, it would have been right down to the wire," Morwick said. "I'm really proud of this group. We don't get the studs coming in like Williams does, but somehow these kids, I don't know, it was just cool to watch. It was a team effort."


The Setonian
News

Dental students will have the opportunity to pursue health-related fields

Dental students interested in public health now have the opportunity to complete a Master's Degree in Public Health simultaneously with their dental degree. In the fall of 2003, the executive faculty of the School of Dental Medicine approved a joint degree program with the graduate programs in public health within the School of Medicine. Students enrolling in the School of Dental Medicine may now also apply to the Graduate Programs in Public Health to be candidates for a Masters in Public Health degree. "The state of oral health is under-serviced in many areas of the U.S., most significantly in children and the elderly, thereby emphasizing the importance of integrating public health and dental education," assistant director of admissions for the Dental School Katherine Wasilenko said. Through this program, students may be able to obtain both degrees in the same four year period required to get the DMD degree. Students taking the program in four years can concentrate in epidemiology and biostatistics or in health services management and policy. A five-year program offers nutrition, health communication, and environmental health. Each student in the program must either take four summer courses or one Public Health course each semester of Dental School. Unlike other dual-degree programs, the DMD and MPH program is not offered as a formal dual degree. Because of this, admissions, registration, and financial aid for the two programs are separate, but the administrative staffs of the schools work to make sure the program is cohesive. "The dean's office at the School of Dental Medicine, the graduate programs in public health, and the Office of Graduate Degree Programs at the medical school work together with each student to make sure that his or her individual needs are addressed in crafting the two degree schedule and in managing the administrative and logistical issues," said Anthony L. Schlaff, Director of the MPH Program said. "We are very pleased to be able to offer this outstanding opportunity to obtain specialized training in public health while enrolled in the pre-doctoral D.M.D. program at Tufts," associate dean for admissions and student affairs Mark Gonthier said This opportunity is accompanied by the November 2003 U.S. News and World Report ranking, which placed the Tufts MPH program as the number one community health program in the country. This ranking was among all programs offering masters degrees and doctoral degrees accredited by the Council on Education for Public Health. The number one ranking of Tufts' community health program placed it ahead of the Medical College of Wisconsin, Northwestern University, Oregon State University and the University of Rochester.


The Setonian
News

Jumbos season ends with loss to Trinity

On Saturday Jan. 31 the men's basketball team traveled to Trinity College and got thumped by a very streaky Bantam team, 74-52. That game only counted as a NESCAC loss. But last Saturday, the two teams got back together at Trinity for the NESCAC playoffs and, in a very similar result, Trinity came away with a 72-57 victory. This time however, the Jumbos fell to an overall solid team, ranked in the top ten in the country. "They have a nice presence down low in Craig (Coupe) and Tyler (Rhoten) and a good shooter in (John) Halas and a steady point guard who doesn't have a great shot, but keeps their offense going," junior forward Reggie Stovell said. With the victory, Trinity moves on to play third seeded Amherst next weekend, while Tufts' season is finished. Trinity pulled out to an early lead, but Tufts was able to counter and tie the game at 11 four minutes in. For the next eight minutes, both teams were very cold. Trinity eventually mounted a 14-4 run, pushing its lead to 11 with three minutes left in the half. By halftime, the Bantams were in control, 36-23. In the first half, Tufts (37.5 percent) actually shot better than Trinity (36.1 percent), percentage wise. Trinity only made two of ten shots from three-point land, while Tufts limited itself to just four three point attempts, making one. In the second half, Tufts was able to cut Trinity's lead to eight with a little more than ten minutes left, but that was as close as the Jumbos would get. Tufts finished with 18 turnovers to Trinity's ten. Bantam forward and reigning NESCAC Rookie of the Year Tyler Rhoten was held to 12 points this time around, compared to the 26 points he scored the first time the two teams met. However, junior sharpshooter John Halas stepped in where Rhoten left off, scoring a game-high 17 points. "All season turnovers have affected us," Stovell said. "Tyler only had 12 points, which goes to show you they have more than Mr. Rhoten." Just like the first game, Tufts played Trinity evenly in the second half. In January, both teams scored 40 points in the second half and in last weekend's game, Tufts scored 34 to Trinity's 36 second half points. The only problem was that Tufts faced a bulky halftime deficit in both games. Trinity shot well in the second half, making 45.8 percent of its shots, while Tufts shot poorly from the field, only making 32 percent of its shots. However, the Jumbos managed to stay in the game by making an impressive 18 of 21 free throws. The two games Tufts and Trinity played this year were nearly identical. However, the one big difference between this contest and the first game played is how Trinity scored. In the first game, transfer Craig Coupe was limited to zero points in only 19 minutes of action. "I got two quick fouls and coach took me out," Coupe said. "And I got another two quick ones in the second half." This game, the trio of and Stovell and sophomores Dan Martin and Blaine Lay shut down Rhoten, forcing him to take tough shots that led to a meager four of 15 shooting performance for only 12 points. However, Coupe got his revenge. The former Jumbo standout played 33 minutes, grabbed seven rebounds, and finished with 13 points, including two drop step dunks. "The big difference was that the first game was kind of awkward," Coupe said. "I just felt a lot more comfortable this game." On the flip side, Stovell was one of Tufts' lone bright spots in the first contest, shooting 5 for 11 from the field, totaling a team-high 13 points. On Saturday, Stovell struggled, converting on just one of ten shots from the field and finishing with six points. Senior co-captain Deyvehn East once again led Tufts with 13 points, playing all but one minute in the game. Tufts' season is finished with an overall record of 8-17. Trinity presses on, ranked in the top ten nationally with an overall record of 21-3.


The Setonian
News

Branding or Brainwashing?

When it comes to fashion, it sometimes seems that the apparel-wearing public is at the mercy of prominent designers and established retailers. When a dominant trend appears, almost everyone jumps on the bandwagon -- making it nearly impossible to find clothing beyond the current "in" look. In order to stay current, stylish individuals must build an interesting wardrobe within the parameters set by the season. It has been said that such a system is the result of corporate brainwashing. Whatever the reason, the fact remains that the clothing we consider stylish is usually the result of decisions over which we have little control. We have all seen the outrageous clothing high-fashion brands showcase in their runway collections. You may have thought, "Who actually wears that?" Truth be told, these sensational displays are little more than publicity stunts to drive up the brand's name recognition. It is this name recognition on which brands rely on to sell their much more realistic "ready-to-wear" collections. By the time the fashions you see on the runway hit Newbury Street, they have been re-worked into much tamer styles. In fact, there may be nothing special about the clothing besides the name. The ubiquitous "logo tee-shirt" is the most obvious example of this brand phenomenon. Given this rather bleak assessment, it's no wonder that many people rely on well-known designers to make their fashion decisions for them. This is why labels are so emphasized in popular fashion. After all, if Gucci says, "It's hot," it has to be, right? The answer to this, of course, is no. Unfortunately, too many people end up looking absolutely ridiculous simply because they fail to question the authority of a prestigious label. For example, several weeks ago I decided to venture into the Copley mall in search of a pair of casual black shoes. I noticed a very discreet 60 percent off sign in the window of a particularly luxurious-looking boutique, and decided to do a little browsing. Once inside, my fate was sealed. The interior was quite mod with all the shoes lined up on long pedestals like an art instillation. At first, nothing caught my eye, but as I surveyed the selection again, I started to think that one pair might work (it was 60 percent off, after all). The salesperson was very accommodating and suggested I try them on (along with several others). As I examined my feet in the gleaming, full-length mirror (to the praise of my helpful salesperson), I decided that the shoes were actually quite charming and proceeded to purchases them without a second thought. Later, in my rather un-fabulous dorm room, I came back to the real world and realized that my shoes were surprisingly strange-looking, far too expensive, and, sadly, un-returnable. With all the clever marketing these days, it can be quite difficult to separate the product from the brand trickery. Having fallen prey to this, I have come to the conclusion that the most dangerous place is the store itself. It is here, among the sleek display fixtures, suave salespeople, and sassy techno music, that ugly, overpriced clothing can become remarkably attractive. While I eventually got over the shoes, I shall never forget the important lesson they taught me: don't be swayed by labels promising unwavering good taste. The only style you can really depend on is your own.


The Setonian
News

Driver takes SUV on residential quad, Miller Hall lawn

Several students called the police after witnessing a car off-roading on the residential quad Saturday night. According to eyewitnesses, the unknown young male driver of a black 2003 or 2004 model Range Rover took his car over the curb in front of Miller Hall onto the residential quad, left tire tracks behind Olin Hall, and then repeatedly drove into a tree on the Miller Hall lawn. "I saw someone pull a U-turn," and then drive very fast in reverse, said sophomore Steve Leichman. "Then about 25 minutes later, a girl got out of the car, and then the Range Rover pulled up on the quad and was kicking up dirt, and almost hit her -- I thought he was going to hit her." Leichman said that it appeared the driver was following the girl. "It looks like she was trying to get around it -- it would follow her. From where I was viewing it seemed like he only came inches from hitting her. Then he backed up and drove into a tree, so I called the cops... And then he drove into the tree five or six times." Sophomore Mark Robinton also witnessed the event. "I saw a vehicle racing around," Robinton said. The driver "almost hit Olin" before "repeatedly" backing up and driving into the tree. According to Leichman, the police arrived while the driver was checking his front bumper for damage after hitting the tree. Several members of the Tufts University Police Department (TUPD) questioned the driver and his female companion for about fifteen minutes. After questioning, the driver was seen leaving the scene in his car. TUPD would not comment on the event until Captain Mark Keith returns this morning. It is unknown if there will be any further investigation.


The Setonian
News

Student response disappointing

I knew that my Viewpoint ("Taking back the date" Feb 19) would raise eyebrows and cause a stir, but I would never have expected such an immature response from some of my fellow Tufts students. One particularly appalling event occurred as I was walking through the campus center. A student yelled at me from half way across the Commons, shouting that my Viewpoint "sounded intelligent" (which I have since interpreted as sarcasm) and that I was "an embarrassment to Tufts University." I took a stand saying I was willing to accept The Vagina Monologues challenge for dialogue. Everyone who I have spoken with in the production has said that sparking public discussion -- and even causing controversy -- is what the show is all about. And that is exactly what I did. However, it saddens me that my Tufts brethren have chosen such a low form of debate instead of engaging in dialogue in return. If you don't agree with me, present your arguments. I welcome all dissenters. But please don't yell, "YOU'RE STUPID!" (essentially) across the campus center. That is not dialogue; that is name-calling. It is pathetic that an opinion that is different from the Tufts mainstream is viewed as an embarrassment to the University. What's an embarrassment to Tufts is this community's intolerance toward people who don't conform to the accepted ideas and beliefs. Finally, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the cast and crew of this year's Vagina Monologues for being so willing to discuss with me the important issues raised by the play. They are a wonderful group of intelligent and talented women who truly understand the importance of honest discourse over the V-Day movement. For all interested, they will be hosting an open Vagina Monologues dialogue today at 7:30 in Barnum 104. Rachel Hoff LA '04


The Setonian
News

Our vaginas, ourselves

I am a proud actor in this year's production of the Vagina Monologues. We seem to have sparked quite a bit of controversy this year, and I find that fact to be absolutely delightful. The more people that talk about vaginas, the closer we come to solving the problems relating to them. Susan Sontag once said "True art has the capacity to make us nervous." I agree, and believe that social change only occurs when people are displaced, if only slightly, from what they have come to know as comfortable and safe. Until we discuss the vagina frankly, openly, and realistically, we cannot begin to tackle crimes against it, such as rape, genital mutilation, and childhood abuse. In one year in this country, over 500,000 women are raped, and two million women worldwide are the victims of genital mutilation (www.amnesty.org). If we cannot say "clitoris" in public, how can we address the issue of the harmful effects of a clitorectomy? By discussing this issue in the form of a play, my group has succeeded in raising at least 5,000 dollars (stay tuned for a final figure) for the aid of women. We must also be willing to consider this organ to be one of value, much as the mind, heart, or hand is a thing of value. In addition to its practical and emotional importance, I happen to think that the vagina is quite a beautiful thing. By reminding people of its beauty, both in the aesthetic and emotional sense, we hope to inspire a sense of "awe" and "reverence", as Eve Ensler, our author, puts it. When the vagina is seen truthfully for the wonderful thing it is, our society will feel compelled to protect it. Therefore we must look at it, must talk about it, must allow it its proper place in our minds and hearts. When we have succeeded in doing to, the entire world will be a "vagina-friendly zone." I am sorry if some people are offended by the open way we of this production have presented the vagina to them; not because I have offended them, but because the fact that they are offended means that they misconstrue our purpose. When the vagina is elevated to the same level as the woman's mind, heart, spirit, and body, then will women truly be complete people and equal members of this society; we cannot be thus until our very real and vital sexuality is allowed to exist. Everyone loves to discuss the former four aspects of womanhood, but no one wants me to express how I feel, how I glory in, my vagina. I have every right to do so, and I intend to exercise my right to be an intelligent, beautiful, spiritual, loving, and sexual woman. I will not deny one aspect of myself for the sake of puritanical mores. Further, by celebrating my sexuality, I am not being obscene or objectifying of women. By owning my body and what I do with it, I am setting a standard; I am in control. I will not allow my self-conception to be twisted by others; I prevent this eventuality by the strength and volume with which I proclaim myself a complete, whole, enlightened woman. I see my body through no other eyes than my own, and my eyes are not objectifying me. Neither am I "male-bashing" by enumerating the crimes that have been perpetuated by men against women; these are simply the facts. Women have hurt other women and will continue to do so, but this eventuality is much more rare. Finally, I am not suggesting that because a woman is in touch with herself as a sexual being, she should eschew traditional, loving, monogamous relationships. As a member of such a relationship, I find I have a greater understanding of myself as a woman thanks to this experience, and that this knowledge is nothing but beneficial in my relationship. My boyfriend is quite proud of my participation in this cause, and I am very grateful for that. Not all women are so lucky, and it is these women for whom I fight. I leave you with a quote, my favorite from the show: "We forget the vagina. What else could explain our lack of awe, our lack of reverence? The heart is capable of sacrifice. So is the vagina. The heart is able to forgive and repair. It can change its shape to let us in. It can expand to let us out. So can the vagina. It can ache for us and stretch for us, die for us, and bleed and bleed us into this difficult, wondrous world. So can the vagina. I was there in the room. I remember." Caitlin Johnson is a freshman who has not yet declared a major


The Setonian
News

Strong spring rush gives Greeks hope

This semester's successful rush has given Greeks a much needed shot in the arm at a critical juncture in the system's future. The boost comes at a time when many fraternities and sororities are at a crossroads, struggling to adapt while preserving the character of their houses. Finding a way to accomplish both is vital if the Greek system is to secure its place at Tufts while not slipping into viewbook-friendly dullness. A dangerous legal environment, coupled with increasingly vocal neighbors, and overall higher University standards have forced many houses to make difficult and fundamental changes. The steady crackdown on large-scale fraternity events has changed the character of the system's social activities. Faced with the prospect of -- at best -- an early end to parties, most houses have cut back the number of large-scale events they host. Social functions are smaller and less open to people with no direct connection to the fraternity. Once places where students of all social circles mingled on weekends, the fraternities are increasingly becoming closed societies. The University has also handed down high-profile hazing punishments in response to the threat presented by a litigious society. Some houses have faced additional pressure from their national offices to purge the pledge programs of more traditional activities in favor of "hazing alternatives." Theta Delta Chi, better known as 123, switched recently to a Zeta Beta Tau-style program that discourages hazing. ZBT does not have a pledge program; new members become brothers almost immediately upon joining. Other houses have faced suspensions or probation, severely impacting the number of members. Dwindling numbers have put a financial strain on houses, and in turn reduced their ability to fund activities. Ironically, these changes -- which threaten the very future of the system -- so far have served to improve and energize it. Many members of troubled houses report that the challenges have forced them to organize better and take more responsibility for their actions. Along with Greek Affairs Director Todd Sullivan, the system is increasingly making good-faith efforts to clean up its act and improve its relationship with neighbors and the University. But these changes have come at a cost. Many Greek upperclassmen and alumni lament a system that is so different than the one they experienced just a few years ago. And one has only to walk down an eerily quiet Professor's Row on a Friday night to know that the social scene has been altered drastically. Just as the magic of the Naked Quad Run was robbed by this year's changes, the Greek system has suffered a similar sterilization. The dangers presented by the old Greek system or the Naked Quad Run are undeniable. But however necessary the changes are, they are viewed with great sadness by many who know things used to be better. Regardless, the reality of the situation is that Greek houses have no choice. Evolve or become extinct. It is a lesson Zeta Psi, Delta Upsilon, and Delta Tau Delta learned the hard way. In the end, the challenge facing the Greek system is to reinvent itself in a way that avoids the University's ire, yet reclaims much of the mystique of the old system. If Greeks can accomplish that, the system will emerge from this trial by fire stronger. But should they fail, fraternities and sororities will likely lose what made them special to so many people and become little more than specialty houses.


The Setonian
News

Larry, you got some splainin to do

As this year progresses, I realize more and more how much the Bacow administration reminds me of the Bush administration. No, compassionate conservativism has not run amok on this bleak hill in Medford. However, our administration has modeled its communications strategy after that of our 43rd President. That strategy is simple: tell them nothing. This administration makes no attempt to keep students apprised of what is going on, even when it is very important to us. The only time students hear from administrators is when they need something from us (including participation in an event or program), when they are showing something off, or when something bad happens. However, each week, the administration is involved in many campus issues, of which many students need to be made aware. The fact that the Daily reports on many of these issues does not absolve the administration of the need to communicate directly with the student body. Even when administrators do talk to the Daily and other publications on any issue that is potentially controversial, they rarely give a helpful answer, and usually provide some spin. The half-stories of what's going on on-campus from administrators leave many questions unanswered, and students out-of-the-loop. Take, for example, Sophia Gordon Hall, a dorm that was supposed to be nearly complete by now. What's going on, and why isn't the administration keeping us actively informed? Arguably, one of the largest student life problems on our campus is the lack of available housing, a problem that nearly all students will deal with in their time here. Not only is administration failing to keep students informed on this issue, but also is preventing students from having a say in what happens. One of the phrases that the University has been trumpeting lately is its commitment to instilling "active citizenship" in its students (exactly which of its students is another column.) But while the jury is certainly out on what exactly "active citizenship" is (besides a broad, pleasant-sounding term to draw investment and make people feel special), it is safe to say that the place where you can be most active is in your own community. Unfortunately, by failing to include the student body in the dialogue surrounding most of the important issues on this campus, we are prevented from being completely active citizens. You cannot be an active citizen in a community that inherently discourages knowledge and activism. For example, if students knew exactly what the hold up with Sophia Gordon Hall was, we could easily mobilize and lobby the City of Somerville, since many of us are taxpayers, and many more of us support the City via its draconian parking enforcement system. Nevertheless, there are many students in our community that are extremely active. However, they receive no fanfare for this activism. That fanfare is saved for students involved in communities outside our own. Activism on campus in any potentially non-trivial realm is actively discouraged, because that activism would make the life of campus administration potentially difficult. For example, it is far easier to invite already over-compensated members of our 'host communities' to meet with pre-screened, non-controversial, polished "University College Scholars" to eat scones and sip tea and discuss, for the thousandth time in a matter of months, ways to better serve their needs ("Bacow, students discuss community service work," Feb. 19). This avoids the possibility that a real issue may be raised that might not leave everyone feeling all warm and gooey on the inside. But the important things in life are not warm and gooey. There are some who point out that President Bacow has no accountability to the student body. It is the Board of Trustees who can demand things from him (along with, in practicality, any big-bucks donor.) But, in general, the goals of the Trustees cannot be satisfied with a dissatisfied student body. After all, we pay the tuition, we fill the classrooms, and we will contribute donations as alumni in the future. So for now, students are left to fend for themselves, and we do it pretty poorly. Sure, if we want to do something nice and uncontroversial, we get support. But take for example the completely antagonistic relationship between students and the Office of Residential Life and Learning. Since the beginning of the year, two of the most student-friendly senior members of the ORLL staff have left under mysterious circumstances. Resident Assistants, who have been selected because they are student leaders and students relate well to them, are essentially banned from speaking out or even speaking up. Several RAs have commented on numerous occasions about how any comment they make is interpreted as insubordination. In defending the most recent gag order placed by Director of ResLife Yolanda King regarding an alcohol policy forum, Dean of Students Bruce Reitman defined the policy as saying, "They're [RAs] not authorized to speak for ResLife or to critique the policy." ("Controversy erupts over alcohol panel speakers" Feb. 18). While I understand that RAs are not authorized to speak for ResLife, the concept that they cannot provide criticism is completely unacceptable in a learning environment. Who is to define what is discussing and what is 'critiquing'? This policy is overbroad, and its implementation makes RAs fear speaking about anything related to ResLife in a public setting. This creates an impossible situation: the students who have knowledge of the actual implications of policy cannot share this knowledge with the public, nor can they share their concerns with the ResLife administration without fear of retribution. So how can we make this work? Well, President Bacow can re-emerge out of the hiding he has been in all year, along with Provost Jamshed Bharucha, and maybe start answering some of our questions. Maybe he can even tell Yolanda King to abandon the crusade of Us vs. Them that has been created between anyone affiliated with her office and the student body. But more concretely, while it's great that students automatically receive e-News subscriptions with information about Tufts community members in the outside world, the administration should send students periodic updates of what they're doing on campus, on issues that affect our daily lives. Now that President Bacow has a Chief of Staff, how about an ombudsperson? Someone who actually has to listen to student input and complaints, and who will actually have an impact on the decisions that are made for us? You want us to be active citizens? Start letting us. Adam Pulver is a junior majoring in Political Science and Community Health. He can be reached at Pulver@tuftsdaily.com


The Setonian
News

Block schedule is an obstacle for more language class time

While Tufts is not following the national trend of increasing the number of foreign language courses, demand for more class and conversation time has led to scheduling conflicts. The latest Foreign Language Enrollment in United States Institutions of Higher Education, which was released in October, showed a sharp spike in enrollment in language classes, which has increased 17.8 percent in the past four years, to over .1.35 million people. At Tufts, the number of grades issued in the foreign language departments has remained relatively constant over the last ten years. In the 1993-94 academic year, there were 4,317 grades given, compared to 4,370 in the 2002-03 academic year. The difference from previous years is that professors in language programs have been trying to increase class time in the form of longer sessions and conversation groups. These desires have put the language departments at odds with the new block schedule, which disallows classes to meet more than three times a week. Dean of Undergraduate Education James Glaser said that although he has not heard any specific complaints, it does not mean the language departments have not expressed concern "I don't think the administration has thought about whether this is a problem or whether it can be fixed," Glaser said. Professors say that there does not seem to be a solution in sight. The French language department has desired more class time for years, French professor Emese Soos said. French levels 1 through 22 meet three times a week for 50 minutes, which Soos said was the preferred class length, but she would like to see classes meet four times a week -- an impossibility due to Tufts' block schedule. "The logistics of doing so, for as many sections as we have, were deemed too complicated by the chair of our department, so we never even broached the topic with the administration," Soos said. Instead of additional class time, the French department has run weekly 40 minute conversation groups. These groups were first required only for French 21 and 22 but have now expanded to include French 4. Italian language professor Patricia DiSilvio said although she would welcome more class time, she recognizes the drawbacks. Part-time lecturers who receive a fixed stipend per course may object to the additional work. Also, since language classes also receive one credit, DiSilvio said students might be more inclined to instead take a class with less time. "I wish we could teach 50 minute classes four to five times a week, but we can't do this because of the block schedule," Japanese language Professor Kiyomi Kagawa said. In an effort for more contact time and practice, Kagawa attempted a conversation group for beginning and intermediate Japanese students in the past, but the block schedule and a lack of staff available to instruct the conversation groups made it a challenging commitment. Conversation groups are no longer part of the Japanese language curriculum. The Chinese program uses the 75-minute "plus" blocks twice a week, and a regular 50-minute session for the first and second year classes, Chinese Professor Dr. Mingquan Wang said. "I think the plus block is too long. We always end up with 15 minutes or so at the end of class that are unnecessary," sophomore Chinese language student Gabe Barenberg said. Japanese and Chinese classes are scheduled three times a week for 75 minutes each. In contrast, romance language classes meet for 150 minutes a week total, a typical amount of hours for a Tufts class. "One of the reasons for the extended sessions is that Chinese is considered one of the most difficult languages, along with Arabic and Japanese, for American students. Thus, the time required to achieve the same level of proficiency in Chinese is significantly longer than other languages, such as French or Spanish," Wang said. Some students disagree with the Chinese Department's schedule. "I think that part of learning Chinese is grasping the grammar, and the professor's presentation can indeed help with that," Barenberg said. "As much as I dislike class on Friday, I think shortening the plus block would do more good for the curriculum than eliminating the third class." Conversation groups are also held for Chinese language students but are student organized. The Chinese House, which opens next fall, hopes to make a Chinese conversation group part of the weekly regimen. "Most teachers want to have more time with their students. But we have done studies comparing what we do at Tufts with other German programs and find that in terms of student progress, we are doing very well, and in terms of contact hours, we are comparable with many area schools," German professor Christiane Zehl-Romero said. Additional German practice is offered at Kaffeestunde (coffee hour) at the German Haus, where students may speak with faculty and German foreign exchange students. Some students question whether additional class time is necessary or warranted. "Sometimes, I think it might be more productive to meet in two longer blocks since we already have additional time speaking on our Konversationstunde [conversation group]," sophomore German student Amie Kuttruff said. "I prefer the 75 minute blocks. Over the course of a week, we have the same amount of class time as with shorter blocks, but we have more time to prepare between classes. The longer classes allow us to better focus on the material and have more in-depth discussions," sophomore Italian student Jordan Levie said.


The Setonian
News

Enthused sorority pledges bring new strength to sisterhood

Tufts sorority rush represented a positive turn for sororities after last year's tensions with the administration and decreased interest in the program. The total number of sorority rushees increased 50 percent from last year, according to Director of Fraternity and Sorority Affairs Todd Sullivan. "Recruitment is extremely important for the Greek system because it provides each house with new enthusiastic members," said Chi Omega president Sarah Fiorillo. "All three sororities have experienced expansions in membership as a result of a very successful spring recruitment." During last spring semester's pledge process, two intoxicated Alpha Phi pledges were placed in police custody. The house was prohibited from hosting social events until Dec. 1 of this year, which placed a damper on sorority life. "It's gotten a lot better since [Todd] Sullivan started. The system as a whole is on better terms with administrators," president of Alpha Phi Karen Schnur said. "It's been really helpful being able to talk to [Sullivan] and get our voices and concerns dealt with directly and increase communication," Fiorillo said. "He's really enthusiastic and a great resource for all of the houses." Sorority life plays a less-visible role in community-building on campus than do fraternities. "Through philanthropy, we have events happening all year long, we participate with LCS and Hillel, and we also have sisters in leadership positions across campus," Taylor said. Chi Omega pledge Jessica Feinberg wanted membership in a sorority to add "a whole new dynamic" to her social experience. "I wanted a nice group of girls [to be with], a place to go home to," she said. Pan-Hellenic Day, a general introduction to sorority life, began the rush on Super Bowl Sunday, which was followed by a series of theme and house parties throughout the week. While men generally enter their rush week with an idea of which house they would prefer, sorority rush is less specific and gives interested women the chance to scope out all three options. "Our rush is a formal rush, we get to know the rushees, and they get to know us," Schnur said. "As you get to know each other you start to find out what they're looking for in a house, and what each is actually about". "It was fabulous, and very well-organized, and a lot of fun," Feinberg said. "I'm hoping for really good connections with people that I'll be able to carry into the future. I think sororities are a really good facilitator of relationships like that." "Sorority life on campus has greatly improved in the past year," Taylor said. All three houses had a great rush and have enthusiastic pledge classes that will carry them into a strong first semester next year." -Kat Schmidt


The Setonian
News

A greater cause

I am writing this viewpoint in response to Rachel Hoff's "Taking Back the Date" from 2/19/2004. In it, she alleged that Eve Ensler's The Vagina Monologues does not liberate women, as it claims to, but rather imprisons them, as they are driven to self-identification with, and only with, their sexual organs. This is as far from the truth as one can get. The ultimate goal of The Vagina Monologues is to explore, celebrate, and acknowledge a subject that has long been taboo. Women's sexual victimization -- rape, assault, genital mutilation, molestation, and lack of reproductive healthcare -- is a global, unfettered phenomenon. In our country, one out of four American women will be sexually assaulted in her lifetime. The number one cause of death for women of developing nations is birth (thanks to Bush's global gag rule on medical clinics that educate on and provide birth control methods). Genital mutilation, or female circumcision, is still a widespread phenomenon in many African nations, and in some Middle Eastern and South Asian countries, a woman risks death for disclosing she was raped, for the shame it brings upon her family. These issues are rarely spoken about, and Ensler's The Vagina Monologues brings all of them to the forefront, addressing both the negative and the positive aspects of a woman's sexual experience. A woman is much more than her vagina and Ensler is pushing for an open dialogue on the societal ills that have reduced women to such a limited identification. To think The Vagina Monologues limits a woman to her reproductive organs is an ignorant generalization. The play celebrates a woman's sexuality as an integral part of her being, something she should have power and responsibility over, not something society, culture, religion, or politics should dictate for her. In claiming that scenes of "rape, genital mutilation, sex, and child-birth" draw viewers by its "pure shock value" is to deny the actual relevance of such issues. Should we never educate the developed world on the plight of women in developing nations because certain words may shock, confuse, or scare people? Ensler is demanding attention to the prevalence of sexual assault on a global scale. The fact that bringing up these "taboo" words stirs such controversy only affirms the conviction that they aren't spoken about enough. And what is the problem with the word "vagina"? In placing it as the title of the show and as the binding subject for each monologue, it is simply opening up the formerly censored discussion on women's sexual experience, be it abuse, pain, happiness, pleasure, love, and yes, even abstinence. In Ms. Hoff's explanation of the "V-Day phenomenon" she conveniently forgot to discuss the millions of dollars raised each year through The Vagina Monologues' ticket sales that go to rape crisis centers and domestic violence prevention programs all over world. All the proceeds from every college and community performance of this play are donated to local charities dedicated to ending violence against women. This year, the Boston Area Rape Crisis Center will receive all the proceeds from Tufts' performances. This V-Day (which does stand for "violence", as in "victory over violence"), thousands of women will march in Juarez, Mexico, a small town on the Texas-Mexico border in which 90 have been murdered and 300 young women and girls have been kidnapped, raped, and mutilated -- there is not a single convicted perpetrator. The marchers hope to shake the local police out of the complacency they have taken towards these women's stories. A previous V-Day has seen the opening of the V-Day Safehouse in Kenya: a place where girls who have been genitally mutilated can flee to, to receive medical treatment, or where girls being threatened with the procedure can find sanctuary. On another V-Day, Japanese women in Tokyo finally asked for a long-overdue acknowledgement from the Japanese government of the use of young women as sex slaves to Japanese soldiers during World War II. It is hard to disagree with the V-Day movement Ensler has created. Perhaps its quick and dramatic rise in popularity has to do with the absolute necessity of a dialogue on issues previously silenced in our society, rather than its "enticing" language and "pure shock value". If you think talking about people's varied sexual experiences and yes, vaginas, is inappropriate, do not buy a ticket, do not contribute to the Boston Area Rape Crisis Center, and do not listen. Ignore issues of sexual violence and abuse and remain in your isolating, silencing, yet comfortable, status quo. Just please do not ask a woman who has something to say about her sexuality, her stories of celebration and pleasure or abuse and violence, to keep her story quiet because it makes you feel uncomfortable. She has been silent long enough. Dana Sussman is a senior majoring in International Relations.


The Setonian
News

Jumbos get second chance at playoffs

Sometimes, a second chance is all a team needs, and a little luck never hurts. The men's ice hockey team got exactly that this weekend when it found out that it will be representing Tufts as the eighth and final seed in the NESCAC playoff quarterfinals next weekend against number one seeded Middlebury College. In its last weekend of NESCAC conference play, the hockey team achieved its goal of winning one game and surpassing last season's win total. However, the team also recieved word that Wesleyan's Athletic Director forced its team to drop out of the tournament, citing disciplinary reasons, giving Tufts a birth in the playoffs. In the Jumbos 2-0 victory over Wesleyan on Saturday night, only senior All-American goalie Jim Panczykowski suited up and played in the game for the Cardinals, the rest of the seniors watched from the stands. "We're all grateful to have been given this opportunity," junior forward Gino Rotondi said. "We know Middlebury is a great team, and we're really looking forward to playing up there, it's a fun playing environment." However, beating Middlebury will not be easy for Tufts. The Panthers, winners of 12 out of their last 13 games, have won the NESCAC crown three of the past four seasons, and already squashed the Jumbos 12-2 earlier this year. The squad will need to be on top of its game, especially defensively, to prevent another onslaught of Middlebury goals, as in early January. "We're going to have to play our best defensive game of the year to even have a chance," Rotondi added. "And our goalie, Ben Crapser, will need to continue his high level of play if we want to win." However, hockey aside, the second wind for the underdog Jumbos could prove to be the difference of next weekend's game. "We're a team of destiny," Rotondi said. "The new miracle."