Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Fletcher students travel to New York for career fair

Almost half of Fletcher's student body traveled to New York last week for the school's annual career fair. Classes at the school were cancelled Thursday and Friday so students could attend information sessions and network with alumni in the city. The trip attracted 150 students -- compared with 110 last year -- and included panels on careers in finance, law, media, human rights, and other areas, as well as site visits and an evening reception. Susan Ingleby, the director of Fletcher's Office of Career Services, said the trip was informational, "not a career fair with guaranteed jobs." "As the majority of students at Fletcher use their time here to change careers," she explained. "The different panels offer first-hand information about a new field that students may be considering but don't know very much about," she said. OCS Associate Director Tamara Golden said the trip tends to attract more first-year students, who arrive at Fletcher either undecided on or wanting to change their career paths. "Part of the information gathering is for them to hear first-hand from the panelists what the work is like, what the lifestyle is like, and the salary range," she said. Most of the panelists were Fletcher alumni. "It's great fun to meet with the students most of who come from interesting backgrounds," said Edward Schumacher (F '72), who moderated a panel on careers in the media. He is now the chief executive and editorial director of Meximerica Media. Students expressed mixed opinions on the success of the trip. Some said that while they found the trip informative, they were less sure that it was successful in helping students create valuable contacts with alumni. First-year student Roberto Porzecanski was surprised by the panelists' honesty. "They tell you 'you're not gonna be the king of the world' just because you have a Fletcher degree," he said. Ben Mazzotta, another first-year student, discovered differing views on the usefulness of a Fletcher degree. "It's useful to know whether a Fletcher degree is all you need," he said. Second-year student Odil Ruzaliev said the panelists gave him a better understanding of how to search for a job. "Most of the time, you don't know the best approach to look for a job," he said. But some of those same students found networking difficult. "It's easy to overestimate what a two-hour reception can do in terms of networking," Mazotta said. Porzecanski agreed that the trip was more useful as a source of information than for making contacts. But Golden said she has seen many cases when students make contact with panelists who eventually hire them or help them contact someone else within their organization. "People have found internships, careers and even spouses on the career trip," she said. Alumni also recalled instances of when they had helped students. "I've tried to introduce to students other people and help them get jobs," Meximerica's Shumacher said. "When I was at The


The Setonian
News

Sending Espresso's to bed without 15 percent

Finally a real controversy has erupted on Tufts campus. A few days ago it was revealed in the Daily that the popular restaurant, Espresso's, charges 15 percent extra on all orders that are made on points. This is some bull-shizznat-shnizzle-shnazzle. Now everyone on campus is abuzz about how we're all getting ripped off. Who does Espresso's think they are, nickel-and-diming us? That's Tufts's job. That extra 15 percent is money we could be spending to print stuff at the library or on parking permits. Our parents work hard to earn that money. Why should they pay extra when we get drunk and want greasy food at one in the morning? For as long as I've been a Tufts student, Espresso's has been the most popular restaurant on the points system, mainly by default. Look at their competition over the last few years. Panda Palace? The food there is what they actually serve to pandas. Wing Works? No it doesn't. Near East? Near Poison. Kee Kar Lau? Dog Cat Bird. Espresso's is the only restaurant on points that doesn't completely suck. But that doesn't make it good. My main problem with Espresso's is that their food does not taste good. Maybe it's because I'm from New York (Rockland County, baby). You Mass-ites don't know what good pizza tastes like. Even a New Yorker like me can get used to bad pizza after going to Tufts long enough. Regardless, on the very same block as Espresso's are Andrea's and Nick's, two pizza places that make better pizza than Espresso's. And if you prefer Espresso's to those places it's only because you're used to it. Trust me - it's not good pizza. Even meals that Espresso's does well like the chicken finger sub are better at Andrea's or Nick's. Another problem I have with Espresso's is their delivery. They always bring you the wrong thing. If you ask for a Coke, they will bring you a Sprite. And if you ask for a Sprite they will bring you a Dr. Pepper. And if you ask for a Dr. Pepper they will punch a pepperoni through your forehead. But seriously, they always bring you someone else's order. And then, when they come back to get that other person's order, they get mad at you for eating it. Well, what did you expect? I'm drunk. And now we find out about this 15 percent thing. What does Espresso's take us for? Do they think that we're just a bunch of spoiled rich kids that don't know about the value of money and don't care if we're getting overcharged? If so, then they are absolutely right. But so what? I'm sober and not hungry right now and I'm pissed. They shouldn't be able to take advantage of us like this. Points don't seem like real money but they are. They're like Disney dollars. One dollar in points is worth one dollar in reality. So why do we spend them so frivolously? Because it's our parents money and they don't even know what half the stuff on our tuition bill is in the first place. Espresso's knows this and is exploiting us. I suggest that we end our already broken contract with Espresso's and give it to another restaurant. A lot of people want to put popular local restaurants like Tasty Gourmet on points. I love Tasty but it wouldn't work. Two years ago, they tried putting Rose's, a quality local Chinese food place, on points. After three days, they were so overwhelmed with orders that they dropped out. Popular local restaurants can't go on points because they can't handle the influx of orders. That's why the only restaurants on points are sub-par. That's why I suggest we offer the points program to Domino's Pizza. They will replace Espresso's as the resident pizza place and their pizza, while pretty bad, is still better than Espresso's. The main reason to use them is that they are a huge chain, they have a dependable delivery service that brings you what you ask for, and they have enough manpower not to get overwhelmed by the huge increase in business a place on points will take in. Plus they have the Noid. Even if we don't use Domino's and decide to go with some other place, we should kick Espresso's off points. Sure some people might get whacked. But that's a small price to pay for fairness. Andy Zatz is a senior majoring in English.


The Setonian
News

Get Up, Stand Up!

Last week, I had the fortune of volunteering at the CNN/Rock the Vote Presidential Forum at Faneuil Hall. I was amazed by the fervor with which young people were going nuts for their respective candidate, cheering and screaming. I felt proud of the disproportionate amount of Tufts students and alumni who were part of the various crowds, but I wondered why our school had so many people there. People kept giving me the same explanation, "Well, Tufts is such an activist campus." I did not have the heart to tell them how wrong they really were, because Tufts has lots of students involved in politics, but true activists are few and far between. Yes, Tufts has tons of students who do internships in government, volunteer on campaigns, take lots of political science classes, serve in student government, and are political news junkies. But these are not the activists. The passion these students have is for the process, the potential fame, and even the overly-broad, nauseating term "public service." I call these students the "pre-politicians." They do have views on a lot of issues, but they frame them in terms of elections and party affiliations. They are not preparing to change the world, but rather to work in the system. That is not activism. Activism requires challenging the system and saying that the system is not working. Community service is not activism either. Going to a soup kitchen, raising money for a "good cause," and increasing awareness are all extremely worthy activities, but just because they involve working with "the people" does not make them activism. They are all band-aids that do nothing to fix a problem in society. Activism requires looking at the root causes of societal issues and trying to make a difference, instead of merely treating the effects. So who are the activists? They are the ones that the general Tufts population sees as radical: The Coalition for Social Justice and Nonviolence, the Tufts Coalition Against War in Iraq, the Student Labor Action Movement, Water Watch, even the Tufts Right to Arms. For some reason, all of these groups are considered outside the mainstream, but they are doing exactly what politically active college students should be doing: identifying problems in society and trying to affect change. You can be a conservative activist, a liberal activist, or even an activist who fits nowhere in any political spectrum. All that is required is the desire to change something, or even to prevent change. Certainly, it is possible to be both a pre-politician and an activist. In fact, some of my favorite politicians started out as activists and continue to be so. However, what scares me is the number of students I meet who will mobilize around any issue, as long as it gets them into the political arena. It makes a lot of sense to become a pre-politician. I am not saying that it is a bad thing to be. The career opportunities in politics are far more lucrative than those in activism. I used to think that I wanted to go into politics. In fact, I declared my major in political science before Thanksgiving of my freshman year, intent on being the next Charles Schumer. But I soon realized a general insipidness amongst many of my classmates. Like me, they loved to argue, to debate, and to study government. But I wanted to use my knowledge of government to make changes, to achieve desired policy goals and, (gasp), to help people. Somehow, the pre-politicians lose sight that helping people is the ultimate goal of government. This makes me worried about the present and future of American politics -- it indicates that political aspects have grown so grandiose that policy goals are being ignored. However, there is hope. The massive mobilization of youth around presidential candidate Howard Dean indicates that maybe, just maybe, our generation is looking beyond polish and "electability" and actually supporting someone who believes in what they believe in. On-campus, the arrival of Emerge, (an activist group focusing on equality based on sexual orientation), and Vox, (an activist group looking to protect reproductive rights), along with the rejuvenation of SLAM, give me hope for the future activists here at Tufts. Activism should be the norm here on campus. Controversy should be encouraged, although in a respectful matter. We should not be afraid to disagree, or to fight for what we believe in, whatever it may be. So bring on the protests, the petitions, and the letter writing. People are afraid of it, but change is good. Adam Pulver is a junior majoring in Political Science and Community Health. He can be reached at pulver@tuftsdaily.com.


The Setonian
News

Average Joe debuts, geeks strike back

For the past few years, a reality program's ability to let the audience mock its contestants has been the integral part when determining whether or not it will succeed in the ratings. On Fear Factor, devotees are captivated by the appeal of watching attention-hungry people do humiliating stunts for money, and Simon Cowell's cruel insults are a big draw to viewers of American Idol. Last winter's surprise hit, Joe Millionaire, was perhaps the biggest culprit of all, gleefully fooling its contestants into thinking their beau was a tycoon only to tell them at the end that he was a poor, average guy. NBC has finally turned the tables on such poor, abused participants with its newest reality series, titled Average Joe. This time around, the contestants are lovable characters that the audience identifies with, while the clueless "bachelorette" becomes the point of ridicule. The appeal of the show, rather than focusing on making fun of the competing bachelors, banks on the fact that everyone knows someone similar to one of these men -- or that everyone also finds someone on the program who reminds them a little bit of themselves. Average Joe stars Melana Scantlin, former beauty queen and cheerleader for the Kansas City Chiefs. She is the embodiment of all that is "hot" in today's society. With long, brownish-blonde hair and a fantastic figure, Melana is gorgeous and clearly knows it. In the first episode, Scantlin is told that she's been selected for a show like The Bachelorette, where she'll have her choice of sixteen "Prince[s] Charming." The ex-beauty queen is clearly armed and ready to strut her stuff in front of some handsome hunks, but much to her dismay (and to the audience's pleasure), these sixteen chosen ones are not even close to being someone's dream date. Nerds, geeks, dweebs, tools, and weirdos. Call them what you will, but the competing bachelors are the social rejects of the world. Still, these Average Joes are unabashedly forward about their social defects. One guy says plainly, "I have had sex with very, very, very, very ,very, very few women in my life." There's Craig and Joe, two disgustingly overweight guys who have the heart of teddy bears. There's Dennis and John, guys who, if they had been around in the early 80s, could have made flawless cameos in Revenge of the Nerds. And true to embarrassing reality television form, some of the contestants were already butting heads over Melana in the first episode. Marc, a 5'4" and balding hothead, was egged -- literally -- by oafish jerk Zach, who seems to be your prototypical New York Yankee fan. Not to be bullied around, Marc schemed to get revenge in a later episode, proving that one does not need to be a six-packed underwear model to fight over a girl. Other interesting characters include Tareq, the 21-year-old university professor and all-around genius, who is juxtaposed with Adam, an extremely likeable guy who just seems to always say the wrong thing at the wrong time. Tareq, in his "one-on-one" time with Melana, stunned her by saying, "It is the simplicity of your complexity that's the catalyst of my infatuation," and asked her, "Do you like broccoli?" The utter randomness of his comments added to Average Joe's surreal atmosphere. Once again, reality television has followed the principles of schadenfreude to establish its ratings' success. A German word which means "taking pleasure in other people's misfortunes," NBC is banking on the idea of schadenfreude as it places its prom queen star in more and more uncomfortable circumstances in order to appeal to viewers' senses of humor and help Average Joe succeed in the ratings. And if the first episode is any example, there are plenty of uncomfortable situations in store. Melana's facial expressions as the motley crew came off of a bus were priceless comedic material. As the realization came to her that she was the target of a joke, she seemed to lighten up a bit. Melana the cheerleader would probably have never even spoken to any of these guys in a normal social situation. Therein lies one of the greater draws of Average Joe. While people love to watch the pained expressions of Melana, they also want to see the nerd get his girl. All of these guys, except Zach the bully, deserve the best. The implicit questions, however, are "Can Melana be the best? Is 'best' defined by her gorgeous looks?" Regardless, the "average Joes" of the world are out and on the prowl, and Melana is all the better (or worse) for it. Everyone loves the underdog, and Average Joe is the show where the underdog wins and a "nice guy" cannot finish last. Only on reality television, where nothing is what it seems, could the nerd take home the prom queen.


The Setonian
News

Behind the top ten

The first thing the 12 Ex-College students saw as they entered the 11th floor conference room atop New York City's famous Ed Sullivan Theatre was a big whiteboard with the words, "Top ten things I can say now that Dave isn't here," scrawled in green ink. Seized by confusion, stricken by panic, and fraught with indignation the students sat anxiously, fearing the worst. Through the effort and persistence of Explorations leaders Adam Blickstein and Rachel Hoff, students in the Ex Colleges' class, "Washington in Technicolor The Impact of Popular Entertainment on Political Perceptions," were going to see the Letterman show. These freshmen were not only granted the opportunity to go behind the scenes of The Late Show with David Letterman and meet with executive producer and Tufts grad Rob Burnett (LA '84), but they were also given exclusive tickets to a live taping of the show. The ex-college class has spent the semester studying the effects of television, movies, books, and other media sources on politicians' decisions and the American public's political views. Recently, late night television has come to the forefront of the political scene, with Arnold Schwarzenegger's announcement of his gubernatorial candidacy on The Tonight Show with Jay Leno. With the democratic primaries around the corner, the class was anxious to meet Burnett to discuss their concerns of a political climate that has become hopelessly entangled with the American entertainment industry. However, during the brief moments before Burnett's arrival, nobody was thinking about what Rob Burnett would say about the contribution of entertainment to politics. With the words, "guest host Paul Schafer," staring them in the face no one was focusing on this once- in-a-lifetime experience Finally, their worst fears were realized: just before Burnett arrived it became clear that Dave Letterman would not be hosting The Late Show with David Letterman because of the birth of his son. In front of a room of nearly devastated students, Rob Burnett entered and took the limelight. The executive producer, however, didn't miss a beat. Clad in his usual business attire -- a yellow t-shirt, jeans and sneakers -- Burnett worked the room like a pro. His introduction was brief, and he immediately invited questions from the students. So what does an executive producer of a major late night television show actually do? "I get an enormous paycheck," Burnett responded to the class's first question. Burnett revealed, however, that he actually does a lot more than that. As executive producer he is responsible for overseeing everything that goes into the production of the show, including the writing, production and scheduling. At one time Burnett was actually head writer for the show, so his role tends to lean towards the writing aspects of the production. In the middle of the meeting his assistant interrupted the conversation so that Burnett could give final approval to that night's top ten list. It was clear throughout the meeting that Burnett's comedic contributions are highly valued by The Late Show. His sense of humor not only captivates the many viewers of the show every night but also kept the interest of the Washington in Technicolor class. "I thought he was a great, really funny guy who gave the students good insight into the political humor of the show as well as the television business," explorations leader Rachel Hoff said. Burnett was full of political stories about The Late Show. He described one instance during a commercial break while the cameras were still running, when then-Governor George W. Bush used a shawl draped around the neck of an assistant to clean his glasses. He also explained how politicians do not get favored treatment on the show. "I have no clue who Dave votes for," Burnett said, expressing the apolitical nature of the show, "we make fun of everybody." Burnett also expressed his concern with an American public that gets its news from late night television. "Good Lord it's a comedy show," Burnett said. "If you're tuning into this show to find out what's going on in the world, you've got a big problem." The Tufts students were also eager to hear about Burnett's Tufts experience. The class of '84 graduate shared some stories about embarrassing himself as a freshman by running full speed into a rope outside of Miller Hall, dropping out of the IR program, and falling into a major in English. Burnett actually taught an explorations class on comedy in America when he attended Tufts. The executive producer talked not only about his show's relationship with politics but also about succeeding in the television business. Burnett emphasized getting a foot in the door through internships, the value of writing skills and the importance of being able to do seemingly menial tasks well. The actual taping didn't stack up to Burnett's amicable, playful performance before the show. Paul Schaffer's short, bald jokes couldn't fill the giant void created by absence of the superstar Letterman. "I was so disappointed," Hoff said. "I've been a fan my entire life." "After being told that Letterman has only been out on two occasions in the last 22 years, it was disappointing that his girlfriend decided to have a baby when we were in town," Explorations student Andrew Caplan said. Despite Letterman's absence, the students were still awed by the entire experience, including having the opportunity after the taping to wander onto the set and sit in Letterman's chair. The highlight of the trip, however, was clearly Rob Burnett. "Meeting with Rob Burnett was enjoyable and entertaining," Caplan said. "He offered great insight on how to succeed in business and in life."


The Setonian
News

Jumbos eliminated in NESCAC Quaterfinal

The volleyball team was eliminated from the NESCAC Championships on Friday night after a 2-3 quarterfinal loss to Amherst. Williams eventually earned the title Saturday afternoon. Since this was a battle between the fourth and fifth seeded teams, there was no clear favorite going into the quarterfinal bout. Amherst had defeated Tufts earlier in the season, though in that game the Jumbos hurt themselves more than Amherst did. On Friday, Amherst won its decision in a hard-fought game that contained as much excitement as was promised. "The match was fast-paced and we really gelled on the court," freshman outside hitter Kelli Harrison said. "Everyone was pumped up. It was probably the most fun volleyball match I have ever played in." After a tremendous start by Tufts, blowing through the first two games and quickly jumping to a ten point lead in the third, few would have predicted Friday night's outcome. But Amherst was not going to be denied a spot in Saturday's semi-final, rallying in the third game and taking the last two games to end the Jumbos season. "Amherst saw how well we were playing and they seemed to get a sense of urgency," sophomore middle hitter Courtney Evans said. "At the same time they picked up their game, we got too comfortable with ours." The squad knew that the winner of the match would be the team that brought the most intensity to the court. Tufts was that team through the first half. Taking Amherst by surprise, the Jumbos quickly took the first game 30-25. Not giving the Jeffs an opportunity to catch their breath, Tufts took the second game in similar fashion with a score of 30-21. "We were all moving together," Evans said. "There were six players on the court, but we were playing like one." With all of the momentum, Tufts rolled into the third game seemingly the safe bet to take the match. It is difficult to rally in a volleyball match after going down in the first two games. Tufts at one point in the third match held a ten point lead and had two match-point opportunities to put the Jeffs away. But at that moment, the Jeffs found the spark that had eluded them the first half of the third game. Amherst regained the momentum in extra points, 32-30. "We let our guard down a little and we let Amherst into the game," Harrison said. "We shouldn't have done that." Stealing the third game and the momentum, Amherst was able to edge the Jumbos out of the playoffs, with 30-27 and 16-14 wins in the final two games. "Our communication wasn't as good in the third game," Evans said. "I don't know exactly what happened. We all played hard. The match was really close and we played with so much heart. It just didn't happen for us." Despite the loss, the Jumbos were happy with their level of play. "It really was one of our best games this season," Harrison said. "Anyone that played would tell you that." Amherst eventually lost to Williams (3-0) in Saturday's semifinal game. Bates defeated Colby (3-1) in the other semifinal bracket, and Saturday afternoon saw the Ephs and Bobcats battle it out in the final. The Ephs won the championship title with a decisive 3-0 victory. Saturday did bring an award for one Jumbo, however. Harrison was announced as an honorable mention selection for the All-New England teams. Harrison shone in the outside hitter position, averaging 3.65 kills per game. "It was a real honor," Harrison said. "I didn't expect it at all, so I was really excited."



The Setonian
News

Alienation and academia

Though it has scant chance of political survival, Sen. Ted Kennedy's (D-Mass.) proposed bill that would penalize universities that, among other things, use early decision admissions processes highlights the preeminent challenges to parity in higher education. Educational policy debate typically entices arguments about public kindergarten, school vultures, and charter schools, but issues surrounding fairness in the acceptance procedures of elite American universities, besides affirmative action, are rarely discussed. Early decision is instrumental in the continued domination of this country's top universities by institutionally and historically privileged elites. This admissions process typically attracts applicants with access to counselors who can advise them on the college admissions process and the advantages of applying early. Moreover, many students who know about the process but require financial aid decide against applying early because of concerns that they will not receive enough assistance. This is especially true at schools such as Tufts, which charge a very high price tag and have relatively limited resources for aid. But early decision is not going to go away; the practice benefits universities too much for them to abandon it. By extending binding offers of admission, universities can increase their yield -- the percentage of admitted students who actually attend -- and thus improve their external reputation. The practice also allows admissions officers to select applicants not only on the basis of what they might contribute to the school, but also their commitment to the school. In an era when universities are ranked by the media and dependent on alumni dollars, the reasons for early decision are legitimate, and it would be wrong of the government to require that universities abandon the practice altogether. Universities, however, should take the initiative to reform the process and reduce disparities in higher education. Allowing students to decline early offers of admission because of legitimate financial concerns is one option that would mitigate the negative effects of early decision. While Sen. Kennedy's bill should not succeed, hopefully it will incite meaningful discussion about the accessibility of America's institutions of higher education.


The Setonian
News

At ECAC's, Jumbos Make PRs Across the Board

With personal records from all seven Tufts competitors, the women's cross country team placed eighth of 45 teams at the ECAC Championship this weekend, with 281 points. The Jumbos hosted the race at the 6K Farm Course in Grafton. The top seven Jumbos did not participate, as coach Kristen Morwick opted to rest their legs for next weekend's decisive NCAA qualifiers. Many other schools took the same route, which gave teams that did run varsity runners -- like third-place Keene State, fourth-place Coast Guard, and sixth-place Vassar -- a considerable advantage. Before she knew that some schools would race top seven runners, Morwick had hoped that Tufts could take third place. Morwick said that squads racing some of their top runners were likely trying to decide who to run in the upcoming national qualifiers, or were simply gunning to take the ECAC championship, rather than focusing on the coming weeks. Regardless of each team's motivation, the participation of top seven runners was likely the reason that certain schools were able to finish so high in the overall results. "I think that some of the teams ahead of us, other than Williams and Middlebury, were there because they had some of their varsity kids in the race," Morwick said. Williams, the defending national champion, captured the ECAC title with their second seven, by accruing only 55 points and placing all five scorers in the top 22. Recently-crowned NESCAC champ Middlebury was the runner-up with 60 points, and third-place Keene State had 76 points. Tufts finished fifth among the NESCAC schools, which bettered their seventh-place performance at the league meet last weekend. Amherst and Wesleyan, two schools that beat Tufts at NESCAC's, did not fare as well as the Jumbos at ECAC's. Amherst (294) was one spot behind Tufts, and Wesleyan (387) was far back, in 16th. Each of those squads had at least one top seven runner participating. As expected, top Jumbo finishers were senior tri-captain Katie Higley and freshman Angie Lee. The pair crossed the line almost simultaneously and placed 49th and 50th respectively, with times of 25:04.13 and 25:05.35 minutes. They will be Tufts' alternates at next weekend's Div. III New England meet in Cumberland, Maine. "Higs ran an awesome final race of her senior year," Morwick said. She added that both Higley and Lee ran far faster than they did last time they raced at Grafton, at the Tufts Invitational on September 27. In fact, all seven Jumbos achieved course PRs this weekend. "From one to seven, each person ran significantly faster than they have on a 6K before," Morwick said. "Everyone had big jumps. It's a nice way to finish up the season." Freshman Julia Goldberg improved not only in her time, but also in where she placed among Tufts runners--third. Goldberg was 58th in a time of 25:16.89, just seconds ahead of junior Liz Bloomhardt, who was 63rd in 25:23.79. Senior Katie Mason took about 40 seconds off her Farm Course PR, placing 71st in 25:31.35. Freshman Jennifer Torpey was 105th in 26:24.95, and freshman Caroline Chow was 111th in 26:28.96. Morwick praised her team's performances, especially because they were unable to get in a full taper prior to the meet, as would have been optimal. Tufts' second seven had to train as if their 'big meet' was Div. III's next weekend, because the top seven wasn't solidified until last weekend. "For not having the full benefit of cutting back, as they should have for a championship meet, they did great," Morwick said. Higley said that mental factors and teamwork were the keys to Tufts' speed. "At this point in the season, you've got all the training behind you, and you just have to keep it together up top," Higley said. "We went out really hard together and tried to stay in a pack the whole time, to really feed off each other." Looking ahead to Div III's and possibly nationals, Higley added, "That's what we need to do next weekend. And I know we can do it."


The Setonian
News

Jumbos nail down ECAC's

At the beginning of the season, senior co-captain Jon Rosen said that the men's cross country team's goals were to win NESCAC's, ECAC's, and the NCAA New England Championship. Thus far, the Jumbos are two for two. Tufts secured its second straight championship victory thanks to a dominant effort by the squad's 9 through fifteen runners at the ECAC Championship at Grafton on Saturday afternoon. Tufts' score of 38 blew away the rest of the field of 33 teams, which included Keene State (82), Williams (152), Bates (165), and Coast Guard (178). "It was definitely exciting," Rosen said. "We won ECAC's a couple of years ago, but that was with a different group of guys and that time some of the top seven ran, unlike [Saturday]." All seven Jumbos finished in the top 14 out of over 230 runners. Sophomore Matt Lacey led the way for the Jumbos, finishing fourth overall in 26:50. Seniors James Lamoureux (26:58) and Peter Jurczynski (27:05), and freshmen Justin Chung (27:14) and Peter Orth (27:20) also scored for Tufts, finishing consecutively in the eighth through eleventh spots. Rosen finished right behind Orth in 12th place with a time of 27:22, and freshman Dan Jones was one back in fourteenth place at 27:28. "We made a good initial move to get to the front of the pack," coach Connie Putnam said. "We got good position, and we did a pretty good job not relinquishing it. We were a little split up at the three mile mark, but over the last 600 meters we did a good job closing the gap." "The whole team ran great," Lacey said. "I really only saw Peter and James during the race so to turn around in the chute afterwards and see everyone coming in together right behind me was awesome." Lacey's time was his personal record at Grafton. The accomplishment was even more impressive considering that he hadn't run well in recent weeks. Putnam attributed this to the fact that Lacey trained too much as Nate Brigham's training partner, often running 105 mile weeks. This has since been skimmed back to 40 to 50 mile training weeks. "Matt went through a couple of races in midseason where he couldn't do too much," Putnam said. "We cut back on his mileage and I think the extra week of rest really helped him. He looked fresher and faster." Lacey agreed that he felt stronger than in recent weeks. "My goal was to use this as a confidence builder and get back on track," Lacey said. "I think I did that." The ECAC win, coupled with the squad's first ever NESCAC championship last weekend, gives the Jumbos a boatload of momentum heading into Saturday's New England Championship, which serves as a qualifier for the Division III National Championship. The Jumbos can race seven, and the roster is fairly set with junior Nate Brigham, sophomore Neil Orfield, freshman Josh Kennedy, senior co-captain Peter Bromka, sophomore Kyle Doran, and junior Brian MacNamara. The seventh spot will likely come down to sophomore Matt Fortin or Lacey. "They've both done good things this season," Putnam said. "I'll take a long, hard look at things this week and make my decision." In the meantime, Putnam preferred to focus on his team's performance in ECAC's. "The guys that ran knew it was on them to get it done," Putnam said. "There was no one else in front of them. That gave them the impetus to step it up." Putnam also thought that the three seniors racing their final race gave the team inspiration, and Lacey agreed. "It definitely gave them some incentive," Lacey said. "Their last time on Grafton, they obviously wanted to do well there." "They'd be a pretty good top seven at most other schools," Putnam said of his second set of varsity runners.


The Setonian
News

Ski fanatics celebrate Miller's latest release, Journey

As winter sneaks up on the Tufts community, many are drawn to the great indoors -- the artificial warmth of heaters, blankets, and homemade fireplaces. We venture out, bundled head to toe, only for the necessities. However, there are a few among us, a breed of winter-lovers who choose not to hibernate come daylight savings time, and who relish in the zenith of winter wonderland: ski season. For ski enthusiasts, reliable snowfall, blinding sunshine, and working lifts not only signal the start of this year's ski season, but also the opening of famed skier and filmmaker Warren Miller's latest production. Every year, the film maker and his camera crew travel the globe, searching for fresh snow and radical rides by the world's best skiers and snowboarders. As the first snow starts to fall in October, the finished project goes on tour nationwide. For three months, hundreds of local theaters host the movie (often for one night only) in what has become part of a skiing community tradition. With the penetrating and imminent cold so typical of Boston, hundreds of snow enthusiasts gathered last week, first at Boston University and then at our own Somerville Theater, to catch a showing of this year's film, "Journey," before the movie's tour moved on. The theater was filled with energized fans, and many Tufts students in attendance cheered, as celebrated skiers and snowboarders tore down virgin terrain and dashed through glistening slopes with jumps and half pipes. This lively crowd was not a surprise, seeing as Warren Miller is one of the ski and snowboard community's most renowned figures, and he has a consistently massive turn out for his annual film-making adventure. With the myriad featured athletes and location shoots ranging from Copper Colorado to the Atlas Mountains in Morocco, it's hard not to sit back in awe and fantasize about being dropped out of a deafening helicopter into the silence of the untouched powdery mountains of Alaska. This year's film is packed with diverse locations, invigorating music, hilarious anecdotes, some very inspiring hairdos, and even an unprecedented tragedy. All the while, the movie is accompanied by the calm and insightful voice of Warren Miller as he serves as a guide on what he likes to a call "a journey, not a destination." Memorable moments include being introduced to one of skiing's most prominent personalities, Glen Plake, as the film crew goes onsite to his hometown mountain, Heavenly, in Lake Tahoe, California. Plake, complete with a 13-inch mohawk, is what one of the film's athletes calls, "an icon of our sport." In addition to this symbolic glimpse of Plake's radical mohawk, the film highlights what it means to be a pioneer in extreme sports and includes glimpses of what professional skiers do on location when they're not on the mountain. Cameos of barefoot "water skipping" (similar to barefoot water skiing, except that athletes are pulled by a speedy snow mobile instead of a motor boat) in Helena, Montana, along with shots of camel riding in Africa, show that you don't have to strap on a pair of skies to be an extreme athlete. "Journey" is an invigorating and inspiring way to get pumped up for winter and to embrace the season's looming chill. Though the tour left Boston after gracing the Somerville Theater, the film will be showing through April not too far away at the Wachusette Ski Mountain, which is about forty-five minutes south of Boston. So, as the sun sets at four o'clock in the afternoon and the wind tears at your bundled body on your way home from class, the only thing left to do is pray for snow and sunshine. Just hope for open lifts, strap on a pair of skis, plaster your hair into a 'hawk, and let the "Journey" begin.


The Setonian
News

The Latest Bushism is Not so Humorous

As I was reading the Daily yesterday, I came across the article, "Bush bans partial-birth abortions" (November 5, 2003). I was nearing the end of the article when I read the President's declaration that "this right to life cannot be granted or denied by government, because it does not come from government- it comes from the creator of life." I nearly jumped out of my seat. This statement is severely flawed, both in its content and in the larger context of abortion in America. The first portion of the statement suggests that the United States government cannot grant or deny life to an unborn fetus. Does this comment seem erroneous to anyone? The President made this statement after signing a bill that indeed grants the right to life to a fetus in the circumstance of a partial-birth abortion. Conversely, in 1973, the Supreme Court granted women the right to choose in Roe v. Wade -- therefore denying a fetus of the right to life. Government can, and in fact does (with the passing of this new bill) both grant and deny the right to life. The second part of the President's statement brings the larger issue of religion and politics into the forefront. We have established that declaring the right to life does not come from "the creator" but indeed from the government. What really got to me, however, was the President's invocation of religious terminology in the abortion debate -- a debate that should begin and end (at least in legal terms) within the confines of federal legislation. I believe that the separation of church and state is one of the strongest pillars of our society. It protects the inalienable right of human beings to worship whatever "creator" they believe in, or, if it be the case, in no creator at all. Another important duty of this constitutional premise should be to defend citizens against their unwilling submission to the religious beliefs of others. To my utter dismay, this fundamental principle of any truly free society is perniciously undermined when a President of the United States brings religious terminology (and perhaps religious belief) into a legal issue. The statement, if I have read an accurate account of it, is quite crafty. The President does not say "god" but, the "creator." What is the significance of this semantic tactic? By using the term "creator," the President refutes the argument that I have briefly explored above. He could rebuke me by saying that his use of the word creator does not invoke his religious beliefs, but acknowledges that life should only be granted or denied by whatever entity makes life possible -- a seemingly legitimate claim. Unfortunately, there are two things wrong with Mr. Bush's hypothetical response to me. First of all, the term "creator" has undeniably religious connotations. The debate of creationism versus evolution is perhaps one of the more contested metaphysical problems in scientific and religious philosophy, and supports the use of the term creator as unequivocally religious in nature. Additionally (and I must admit this is pure conjecture), it should not be overlooked that the President's own religious beliefs may have somehow made their way into his politics. Mr. Bush is a devout Christian, and while I may be misjudging him, it seems like he fails to see the line between religion and politics -- at least as it should be drawn in this country. The second problem with using the term "creator" is its ambiguity. Whose creator are we talking about here? What exactly did he, she, or it create? Does this creator indeed have the right, the power, or the jurisdiction to grant and deny life? These questions are, of course, unanswerable. They prove that Mr. Bush's "creator" may not be every American citizen's "creator," thereby affirming the term's religious implications. I hope Mr. Bush realizes that he has made a serious miscalculation in his choice of words (it certainly wouldn't be the first time). The President has the right, just as all of us do, to believe in whatever creator he wants, and to grant that creator whatever authority he sees fit. But he does not have the right to let those beliefs infiltrate federal legislation. These criticisms can be assimilated in my ultimate argument -- religious terminology and ideology have no place in the legal terms of the abortion debate because it is not some arbitrary "creator," but the legal structure of this country that has the power to grant and deny life. The argument can, and should be, extended to all political issues in this country that brush up against religious belief (the Ten Commandments in an Alabama courthouse, gay marriage, the "one nation under god" clause, etc.). The democratic institutions of our country and the republican nature of our legal system should be the only arbiters of United States legislation. When religious affirmations come into play, we risk the usurpation of our shared freedoms by unshared beliefs. Todd Walters is a senior majoring in Biology.


The Setonian
News

Concert Board brings hip-hop to Tufts

If you were lucky enough to be attending this year's Hip-Hop show, you will have plenty to dance about. Besides getting up early enough to get tickets in the first half hour in which they sold out, you will have a chance to see two of Tufts Concert Board's greatest recent picks in person. Highly-respected lyricist Talib Kweli and native Boston artist Akrobatik will be making their Dewick debut on campus this Wednesday at 9 p.m. According to Jordan Kolasinski, head Concert Board coordinator, Talib Kweli was the top pick for this year's hip-hop show. He said that Concert Board is thrilled that the famous artist will be appearing. Underground hip-hop performer, Akrobatik, will also appear. Talib Kweli is a different kind of rapper -- he doesn't talk about hoes, pimps and 24-inch rims. Instead, he speaks about relationships, social problems, and segregation. Talib Kweli released his first solo album after collaborating with famous rapper "Mos Def" in Black Star and second with producer Hi-Tek in the duo Talib Kweli and Hi-Tek. Talib Kweli, however, has some new beat makers, which include Kayne West and DJ Quik, who are amongst the hottest and most creatively viable in the game. Although there was a fear was that their slicker and generally more aggressive styles would spoil the honesty and intimacy that has been essential to Talib Kweli's success, Talib Kweli is still the embodiment of that which good hip-hop represents. "I wanna write a way/ I want it right here/ I want to write brave words to fight fear.../ My words apply the pressure to make the bleeding stop," Talib Kweli raps on "Stand to the Side." Maybe this reflects something about what he feels hip-hop should accomplish, what it should talk about, and what it shouldn't talk about. Either way, it will be very interesting to see how this Brooklyn, New York native handles a crowd of Red Sox fans. At least we know Akrobatik will handle his audience well. Akrobatik describes himself as "a regular brother from inner-city Boston." Like Talib Kweli, Akrobatik writes a lot more about life, "There are so many things in the world to address that I find it futile to waste too much time on meaningless battle raps." His music has been influenced by rappers such as, Run DMC, Kool Moe Dee, and LL Cool J. In between Akrobatik's and Talib Kweli's sets there will be some local talent. In Kolasinski's words, the interlude will be provided by, "... a 16-year-old white kid from Davis Square named Daniel Smith who beat boxes." He is supposed to be very good, and was first discovered by a camp counselor. The Concert Board works hard to put on five eagerly anticipated major music events per year. They include "Rocktober," the fall rock show, the hip-hop show, jazz show, and "Battle of the Bands," which allows Tufts bands to compete to be the Spring Fling opener. The Concert Board's piece de resistance is the end-of-the year Spring Fling, which was unfortunately rained out last year.


The Setonian
News

Stats don't tell the story of the game

Coach Bill Samko of the Tufts football team has a saying, "Statistics mean nothing." His mantra was proven on Saturday as the Jumbos lost to Middlebury 10-6 despite dominating the game statistically. Tufts out gained the Panthers by 137 yards, but mistakes prevented the team from capitalizing on its strong offensive performance. Penalties and turnovers by the Jumbos allowed Middlebury to squeak by with the victory. Tufts was penalized eight times for 60 yards, in several instances ending drives that could have provided much needed points. Middlebury, on the other hand, lost just ten yards due to penalties. By keeping their mental mistakes to a minimum, the Panthers were able to take advantage of the few drives that they moved the ball well on. Penalties have plagued the Jumbos all season. The team committed 52 in eight games, and averaged nearly 56 penalty yards per game. Too often false starts, holds, and other penalties killed important Tufts' drives, as was the case in the Middlebury game. Turnovers have also been a situation of feast and famine for Tufts this year. The team had a plus-13 turnover ratio in its five wins, and a minus-5 ratio in its three losses. In Saturday's game, turnovers ended two Jumbo drives in the red zone and another led to the field goal that gave Middlebury a four point lead. An offense is ultimately judged on the points it scores. Yardage is a good indication of how well an offense is playing, but when mistakes prevent it from putting up points, all the yardage in the world means nothing. What appeared to be a good offensive day statistically for the Jumbos did not translate into results on the scoreboard. A Tale of Two Halves Tufts seemed to be in a good position going into halftime. Not only did the team have a 3-0 lead, but it had also accomplished its goal of controlling the ball on offense. Through the first 30 minutes of the game, Tufts had a commanding 20:06 to 9:54 lead in time of possession. Unfortunately the second half brought a new story, as the time of possession was almost reversed and the teams finished the game nearly even in that category. Middlebury tailback Matt Wolf ran wild in the second half, gaining 90 yards and helping the Panthers control the ball. Wolf's running kept the clock running and repeatedly moved the chains for first downs. He was especially effective on the opening drive of the second half, when Middlebury marched 70 yards on 9 plays before scoring on a run by Wolf, and on the last possession of the game when the Tufts defense was trying to stop the Panthers to get the ball back. Wolf was able to pick up a first down on that drive, allowing his team to run out the clock and come away with the victory. By controlling the ball in the second half, Middlebury was able to keep the Tufts offense, which had been moving the ball effectively all game long, off the field. Senior Contributions It was fitting that on Senior Day, several seniors would step up and make big plays for Tufts. Tim Mack finished up a tremendous season with 103 yards rushing and another 39 receiving. Mack spent the majority of his career at Tufts as a wide receiver, but was spectacular in his last four games as a running back, averaging 111 yards per game. Defensive back Mark Tilki wrapped up a dazzling career Saturday. Tilki intercepted five passes for Tufts this year, returning two for touchdowns. He scored another touchdown on a 96-yard kick off return, and finished the season tied for the team lead with three TDs. Tilki was also among the nation's leaders in return yardage. Receiver Ed Casabian picked an appropriate game to have the best performance of his career. Casabian came into yesterday's game with three career receptions for 23 yards. Against Middlebury he more than doubled his career numbers with three catches for 58 yards. The senior-dominated defensive line played well against Middlebury, repeatedly getting into the backfield to make tackles for losses and put pressure on the quarterback. Seniors Reid Palmer, Matt Keller, Caleb Hudak, and Jay Hirsh are all starters on that line. Senior linebacker Matt DePaolis may have been the defensive player of the game for Tufts, as several times he made big hits on Middlebury players to finish the season with 45 tackles. Senior kicker Marcellus Rolle continued his great season with two more field goals against the Panthers, bringing his total up to ten on the season to break an 18-year old Tufts record for most field goals in a season. Rolle will be missed not just for his kicking, but also for his animated sideline presence.


The Setonian
News

Tufts loses its final game

Even if you didn't set foot onto Zimman Field until after the final whistle sounded, you still knew exactly what had happened in Saturday's NESCAC football game between Tufts and Middlebury. All you had to see was Middlebury's team celebrating with helmets in air, singing its fight song on Tufts' field. And if you missed that, you just had to look at the mugs of disgust, spliced with sadness, and eventually the tears on many of the Tufts' seniors' faces, as they slowly walked out of the team's locker room. The faces alone told you that Tufts had the opportunity to win a close game, but came up short against the Panthers, falling 10-6. "It was a tough way to go out," said senior quad-captain Tim Mack, who rushed for 103 yards. Tufts struggled with penalties all day, ending up with eight total. That translated into 60 yards for the Jumbos, while Middlebury only sustained two penalties for ten yards. The Jumbos' two biggest penalties came in the first half of the contest. One of those turned out to be detrimental, while the other was amended by a good play. With the score still 0-0, following a 14-yard rush by Mack, Tufts had the ball first and ten with two minutes left in the first quarter on the Middlebury 35 yard line. Mack was stuffed for a loss of three on first down, bringing up second and 13. The next play was negated because of a holding penalty that cost the Jumbos' offense ten yards. So instead of running short yardage plays, the offense had to spread it out and two incomplete passes later, the Jumbos were forced to punt. With the game still knotted up at zero, Tufts appeared to have another shot at points with 4:34 left in the half. On Middlebury's 42, junior quarterback Jason Casey handed the ball off to Mack for a no gain, but once again the Jumbos were called for a holding penalty. However, this time, the extra down played right into the offense's hands. On the repeat of second down, Casey hit Mack on a five yard out pattern that Mack turned into a 19-yard gain, one yard short of the first down. "Tim Mack opened up our offense unbelievably," Casey said. "[He did so] with his speed and knowledge." Tufts eventually moved the ball down to the 17-yard line before using the foot of senior Marcellus Rolle. With four seconds left in the half, Rolle put the 35-yard field goal through the uprights to give Tufts a 3-0 lead, which it would carry into halftime. In its first possession of the third quarter, Middlebury looked like a completely different team. Led by senior Matt Wolf, who carried the ball 29 times for 115 yards, Middlebury marched up the field after starting at its own 30-yard line. On each Middlebury series, Wolf would run the ball two to three times and then Middlebury quarterback Mike Keenan would look for receiver Charles Howe in the air. The combination worked as a 26-yard pass from Keenan to Howe landed Middlebury on Tufts' 14-yard line. Two Wolf rushes later and the Panthers had a lead they would not relinquish. After the extra point, Middlebury was up 7-3. The following series, Tufts got its last real opportunity to take the lead and put pressure on Middlebury. Casey, who passed for 214 yards, showed poise all day, sitting in the pocket and locating the open receiver. On the drive following Middlebury's touchdown, Casey did just that on a third and 12 play. He calmly sat back and hit senior Ed Casabian on a fade pattern for a 14-yard gain to Middlebury's 34-yard line. The next three plays, Mack took over. After rushing for two yards, Mack broke off a ten-yard run, followed by a 28-yard run to the 12-yard line. After an incomplete pass, Mack rushed for another four yards to the eight-yard line. On third down, the Jumbos' offense opted to pass in the short field and came up short. Rolle came on and hit a 25-yard field goal to push Tufts within one point of Middlebury, 7-6. Tufts would not score again. The most heartbreaking moment of the contest came after Tufts' defense forced Middlebury to punt with 7:25 left in the game, giving the Jumbos a spark of life. However, after the ball had almost rolled to a stop, senior Mark Tilki decided to jump on the ball. He was unable to control possession after he touched it and Middlebury dove on it at Tufts' 15-yard line. "Coach tells us to field everything. I just misjudged it," Tilki said. "I picked it up when I shouldn't have." On that turnover, Middlebury scored on a field goal with 5:36 left in the game to make the game 10-6. Tufts got the ball one more time, but after some close completion attempts, Tufts' burned a timeout on fourth and five and then decided to punt. When Middlebury got the ball back, senior quad-captain Reid Palmer simply stated Tufts didn't execute when it had the chance. Despite having two timeouts remaining, Wolf was able to run out the clock, sealing Middlebury's 10-6 win. The Panthers ended their season 4-4, while the Jumbos dropped to 5-3. Even with the loss, the team did not consider the season a wash. "This is the best team I've ever been on," Casey said. "The seniors set a great tone. The difference between 3-5 and 5-3 was attitude."


The Setonian
News

Conservative groups gain members

The idea of American college campuses being bastions of liberal thought may be disappearing. A recent Harvard study showed Republican President George W. Bush with a 61 percent approval rating among college students, while the most recent Gallop poll showed only a 54 percent approval rating for the whole population. Is conservatism gaining strength among college aged students? The answer depends on who you ask. President of the Tufts Republicans Philipp Tsipman said "yes" without hesitation. "Our club has experienced a literal explosion in interest in our group and new members this year," he said. Today, there are twenty members he considers "very active" within the Tufts Republicans, and an additional 150 students who are signed up on the group's mailing and e-mail list. In comparison, the Tufts Democrats have over 300 people on their email list and at least 60 active members who attend meetings and events, according to senior Justin Krypel, treasurer of the Tufts Democrats. According to statistics from the Office of Student Activities, today's membership is quite different than it has been in the past.. These statistics reveal that in the 1980s the Tufts Republicans enjoyed the largest support on campus, with around 180 students showing some form of interest in the group. "I'm happy to say that we're back in that ballpark today," Tsipman said. He recalled when, as a freshman, the only highly active members of the Tufts Republicans were the two co-chairs and himself. "There's certainly been a building-up process over the last three or four years," Tsipman said. Spokespersons for both the Harvard Republicans and the MIT Republicans claim they also have been experiencing increasing popularity. According to Tsipman, the essential reason "is a feeling of support for the President, who displays a positive sense of the economy and very strong leadership, as opposed to the muddling Democrats." Recent electoral victories including those of Arnold Schwarzenegger in California and Mitt Romney in Massachusetts have also played a role in the students' changing attitudes, Tsipman said. Krypel, however, does not believe that the President is winning the hearts of college students. "The Tufts Democrats is a large organization that has grown ever more popular as George W. Bush has tried to push his ultra-conservative radical agenda on this country," he said. There is widespread opposition to Bush's policies on campus. A recent Daily poll showed 67 percent of students disagreed with the way Bush was reconstructing Iraq. The Tufts Coalition to Oppose the War in Iraq (TCOWI) held rallies with over a hundred participants in the spring. Daily polls taken at the time showed the campus was opposed to military action in Iraq. Tsipman agreed that conservatives are still marginalized on campus. He noted the indifference the Tufts administration seems to hold when Republican students report bias incidents on campus. One student, for example, had her door defaced last year when she placed a sticker on it for a Republican candidate, and received little support from the administration, Tsipman said. "Bias incidents are just something we have to deal with. Conservatives are more willing to let things like this go than other groups, like the TTLGBC. We have things to do, and won't let bias incidents get in the way of them," Tsipman said. More recently, the Tufts Republicans have worked with the Tufts Right to Arms club (TRA), which was officially approved by the Tufts Community Union Judiciary board (TCUJ) Thursday night. "We're very excited about that," Tsipman said. The addition of the TRA, however, leaves some on campus incensed. "At a University where Democrats are not allowed to gain recognition for budget-free clubs focused around individual presidential candidates, the TCUJ has allowed the most powerful special interest group in the country, the NRA, to move in on our campus," Krypel said. Tsipman noted the Tufts Republicans are actively seeking big name speakers to come to campus in the near future, and that in the end of January a group of 15 students will be sent to Washington, D.C. to attend the Conservative Political Action Conference (CEPAC). "Last year Vice President Cheney spoke at CEPAC. This is going to be a major boon for the Tufts Republicans," Tsipman said. The Tufts Republicans see the increase in their membership and activity as an indication that sentiments on campus are turning to the right. The much larger Tufts Democrats perceive no such change, and note that the size of their own group has grown this year, as well.


The Setonian
News

Students say housing plays role in study abroad decisions

Juniors who study abroad find that not having to worry about off-campus housing is one of the many benefits of leaving Tufts to take classes in another country. Each year, approximately 40 percent of the junior class studies abroad, either through one of the ten university-sponsored programs or a program offered by another university. But anecdotal evidence suggests that some of those students' decisions to study abroad are influenced by the housing situation. Senior Tyson Lynch said that his decision to study abroad in Madrid last year was prompted largely by concern that he would not be able to find housing on campus. "The housing situation did play a significant role in my decision to apply to study abroad," he said. "During my sophomore year lottery numbers were not provided early as they are now, so my housing situation was very uncertain. Applying for study abroad gave me an alternative." Of the 1,200 students in last year's junior class, only 70 of them were provided with campus housing. Study Abroad Program and Marketing Coordinator Julie Warner said that she is unaware of specific instances of students choosing to study abroad because of housing concerns, and that the administration has always supported students studying abroad for academic reasons. "It's always been focused on the intellectual experience," she said. "The administration is dedicated to having students open up the world." Though there is no official administrative link between studying abroad and housing, there is an understanding that studying abroad and housing are related. The administration has stressed that students who study abroad in the fall semester have better chances for housing in the spring semester because more students study abroad in the spring than in the fall. Last November, Dean of Students Bruce Reitman told the Daily: "It's going to be easier to find campus housing in the spring than it is in the fall, so it would be probably to be everyone's advantage to study abroad in the fall." A letter sent to sophomores this summer by class dean Chris Nwabeke and an e-mail sent to juniors by the Office of Programs Abroad last month also suggested that students who study abroad in the fall would likely be better off in terms of housing. Many of Tufts' programs allow students to participate for the fall semester only, but it can be difficult in some countries, even through a non-Tufts program. While there are some fall semester programs in France, for instance, most programs are only available for the whole year or the spring semester because the first semester at French universities ends in January, after spring semester classes have begun at Tufts. To alleviate housing problems, the University has started releasing lottery numbers earlier in the year. Last year's numbers were released in early December, which gave students more time to decide whether to look for housing, attempt to live on campus, or study abroad. Though receiving a low lottery number could possibly push a student who is deciding whether to study abroad toward leaving campus, most students interviewed by the Daily said their studied abroad decision was unrelated to housing. Senior Patricia Wong said that the study abroad program she attended in Japan offered her the ability to learn Japanese quickly and easily. "I went because I wanted to learn Japanese and because this was an opportunity that I needed to take advantage of." The university is planning on alleviating the housing problem by constructing a new 150-bed dormitory, Sophia Gordon Hall, between Talbot Ave. and Professors Row. However, construction was postponed indefinitely after Somerville blocked the demolition of the former music building because of its historic interest. The University and the city are still negotiating.


The Setonian
News

Brita can't help you here...

A group of Tufts environmentalists have are trying to increase awareness about water pollution. According to Kate Drexler, the coordinator of the Tufts Division of Massachusetts Water Watch, Massachusetts has the second worst water quality in the country. Drexler warned that mercury, present in every Massachusetts water body, poses the greatest threat to water quality in the state. Mercury invades the tissue of aquatic plants and fish, and is persistent in the environment. As it moves through the food chain, the substance "biomagnifies," meaning that people consuming fish are exposed the highest concentrations of mercury. According to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), exposure to high levels of mercury can result in brain, lung, and kidney damage and severe mercury poisoning can be fatal. Mercury is especially harmful to the nervous system of a fetus or a young child. Hazardous mercury levels are responsible for nearly 80 percent of all current US fish-consumption advisories. The Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) has issued 111 fish consumption advisories, specific to water bodies throughout the state. The MDPH cautions consumers against eating tomalley (the soft green substance in the tail and body of a lobster) from any source. The MDPH also advises pregnant women, nursing mothers, women who may become pregnant, and children under the age of 12 not to eat shark, swordfish, king mackerel, tuna steak and tilefish. The state's freshwater fish advisory does not apply to farm-raised fish sold commercially or to fish stocked in freshwater bodies by the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife. To reduce the risk of mercury poisoning, the MDPH suggests removing skin and fatty material before cooking fish, broiling, avoiding frying, and cooking shellfish thoroughly. Officials also recommend that those susceptible to mercury poisoning consume no more than 12 ounces -- about two meals worth -- of fish per week. According to the EPA, the safest fish to eat because of their low mercury content are cod, pollock, haddock, and flounder. According to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, mercury emissions in the state have been reduced by 60 percent in the past five years, but industrial waste, sewage overflow, and runoff keep the pollution level relatively high. "A lot of it has to do with the fact that the East Coast is very old and technology hasn't been updated to sustain the huge population or to protect the public health," Drexler said. In September, Governor Mitt Romney responded to public concern and announced proposed regulations that would require the oldest and dirtiest power plants in the state to significantly reduce mercury emissions. Romney estimates that the legislation would result a 130-pound reduction in annual mercury emissions. According to the Edison Electric Institute (EEI), American electric companies release approximately 43 tons of mercury every year. But power industry advocates and research groups such as EEI dispute the effectiveness of such regulations. They argue that mercury pollution is a global problem because it is carried around by wind, and forcing power plants to implement costly abatement equipment would not necessarily improve water quality. The proposed changes would be adopted in two phases. By Oct. 1, 2006, facilities would be required to capture 85 percent of the mercury contained in combusted coal and prevent it from being released into the environment. By 2012, facilities would be required to capture 95 percent of the mercury. Regulations would apply to the Brayton Point Station in Somerset, the Salem Harbor Station, the Mount Tom Station in Holyoke, the Somerset Station, the Mystic Station in Everett, and Canal Electric in Sandwich. Facilities for which it would be especially expensive to reduce emissions would be allowed to pursue alternative methods of reducing mercury emissions until they are able to clean up their own plant. For instance, the legislation would allow facilities to help reduce emissions at other facilities or arrange for the collection and recycling of mercury from high school chemistry labs or dentists' offices. Collection arrangements would adjust for the fact that mercury in labs and at dental offices would only potentially become air emissions if, for instance, the buildings caught fire.


The Setonian
News

TCU account earns extra by switching services

By renegotiating the terms of one of its bank accounts, the Tufts Community Union Treasury expects to earn an extra $7,000 to $9,000 in interest income this year. The extra money will ultimately increase the financial health of the Treasury, which funds student organizations. It would make more funding available for student groups in future. After researching competing interest rates on commercial and money market accounts, TCU Treasurer Josh Belkin negotiated with Citizens Bank to increase the interest rate on the Treasury's money market account by half a percent per year. "We've been with them for a few years now, and I asked about what they could do for us," Belkin said. "The interest earned on $1 million is a lot of money." The Treasury manages a budget funded by the undergraduate student activity fee, which increases each year and this year is $216 per student. Treasury funds are kept in three different accounts: the money market account, an interest-bearing current account, and a university account for internal expenses. "We are trying to be more vigilant about what we already do and the money we already have," Belkin said. There are currently no plans to adjust this year's student activities spending to reflect the increased interest revenue. Extra revenue is currently considered "projected," and not yet factored into the budget. "This excess is really intended for future years," Belkin explained. "However, there is plenty of money, and groups that need more money are welcome to apply." Budget and Fiscal Coordinator of Student Activities Ray Rodriguez said that the money will "increase the level of our cushion account and it might effect slightly how much we can offer new groups." The increased revenue will saved to accumulate a surplus, which Belkin said will "mean more money for future years and a larger principal." This will in turn generate more interest income. "We are limited in our resources and anything we can do to manage money better helps," Belkin said. In this case, he said, "[we were] able to take better rates and do more with our money." The Treasury's $1 million annual budget is distributed each year to 135 student organizations. The largest chunk of money, more than $150,000, goes to Concert Board, while the Leonard Carmichael Society and Hillel also receive substantial shares. In the fall 2000 semester, the Treasury was able to increase the return on its allocated funding by switching from a checking account at Fleet Bank to a sweep account at Citizens Bank. The balance of the sweep account is available during the business day and invested into money markets overnight. Since then, the return on student activities money has declined as interest rates have fallen. However, the Treasury has not been able to seek out more profitable investments as University regulations prohibit stocks and other risky investments.


The Setonian
News

Mental health services around the region offer many ways to alleviate stress

College students need mental health services in increasing numbers, according to a recent study by the American College Health Association. In response, college campuses have been improving and expanding their health services programs to offer more accessible and comprehensive care. According to the National Survey of Counseling Center Directors, most counseling center directors have reported even greater demand for services than their resources will allow. Though Tufts offers a wealth of services, many are underutilized according to Health Services Director Michelle Bowdler. The American College Health Association estimates that about ten percent of students now enter college with a prior diagnosis of depression or other mental illness. This trend has been coupled with an increase in suicide attempts and suicides among students, indicating that despite the increased efforts of colleges at support, many students are still not getting the help they need. Researchers at the University of North Carolina suggest that this downturn in mental health may be due to "increasing workload and a rapidly growing and increasingly competitive world marketplace that demands students have increasingly well rounded backgrounds to ensure success." Such demands, however, may also lead to increasing depression in students. "Another reason may be recent economic slumps, which loom large over the heads of soon-to-be graduates seeking jobs. Graduates must be sharp, well-rounded, upstanding citizens in today's global market. Competition is fierce, cutthroat, and many do not feel they can stand up to the challenge or even have the time," added the North Carolina researchers. To help students cope, the Tufts Counseling and Health Services Centers offer services for the entire campus population. Individual counseling with trained professionals is available through appointment at the Tufts Counseling Center. "Students come in to talk about anything from roommate difficulties to indecisiveness about majors to depression," counselor Pamela McCarthy said. Counselors also act as consultants to the leaders of various student groups such as Ears for Peers and the Latino Center. "Our job is to care about students when they are [both] well [and] sick," Bowdler said. Health Services sponsors many outreach programs on campus to ensure that they "are not just a building", but are making themselves accessible and known to the student body. These programs include occasional talks at residence halls at the request of Resident Assistants, distribution of information in the campus center and at booths during special events, and courses taught through the Experimental College. The Student Health Advisory Committee (SHAC) also works directly with Health Services in order to evaluate student satisfaction with Tufts Health Services programs and policies, identify student needs, and ensure that those needs are met with appropriate services and care. In comparison with other schools, Tufts has more counselors available than at Amherst or Williams. However, other schools like Dartmouth and Bowdoin offer a larger variety of services. At Dartmouth, counselors and faculty lead weekly student groups that focus on anything from future planning, to the experience of being the child of an alcoholic. Bowdoin offers yoga classes, meditation workshops, and spirituality retreats. Despite the national mental health trends and improved services, many schools find that only a small percentage of the student body actually utilizes these mental health services -- just ten percent of students do so at Tufts. At Bowdoin, only five to six percent of students use the services, said Jeff Benson, Bowdoin Director of Health Services. Students cite a lack of connection with the counselors as a reason not to participate. "Maybe if I knew the counselors better -- if any of them had a relationship or any sort of connection with me -- I would feel more comfortable going to them with problems," one Tufts student said. Williams, for example, has been able to set up advising groups or panels through which counselors can get to know students more personally. Some Tufts students, however, say they do not use the mental health services, simply because they are unsure of exactly what is offered. Tufts Health Services tries to publicize their services through pamphlets, websites, campus publications, and every event they sponsor or participate in. In addition, Health Services recently formed a group to improve student accessibility and outreach, Bowlder said. However, "We cannot help that not everyone looks at everything," Bowdler said. Bowdler encouraged students who need help to take the next step. "We would like to get out the message that it is no weakness, but actually an act of bravery, to wonder if the feelings you're having are also normal," Bowdler said.


The Setonian
News

Jumbos to battle rival Amherst tonight in NESCAC Champs

Today, Tufts volleyball team will begin its fight to earn the coveted NESCAC Championship trophy and a spot in the NCAA National Tournament, a goal the team had sets its sights on in the preseason. Ending a regular season with a record of 20-10 is an accomplishment in and of itself. However, this is a squad that will not be satisfied unless all of the challenges it set for itself are met. "We need to rally ourselves for this weekend," coach Cora Thompson said. "There are two muscles of this team, heart and attitude, and that is exactly what we need to bring to the table." Standing in the way of Tufts' aspirations will be a quarterfinal game against Amherst on Friday night, which promises to be a grudge match between the fourth and fifth seeded teams. There will be many demons Tufts has to face concerning this specific game, a setting that would make this particular victory so much sweeter. To start off, the Jumbos have not been able to take down the Jeffs in their last nine meetings--a losing streak that has stretched over five seasons. Granted, Amherst has traditionally been a strong contender in the NESCAC, while Tufts has only recently come into its own as a team to beat in the conference. But a significant history of difficulty with a team does stand as a challenge this year's group needs to face. Speaking of history looming over a current season, this playoff scenario is very familiar to anyone around last year--and the memories aren't all that great. Tufts' 2002 season culminated with twenty wins and the team went charging into the Quarterfinals to face Amherst, only to lose 3-1. The circumstances were a bit different -- Amherst was the dominant team at third place in the division, while Tufts held sixth. The sting of that loss, however, could add extra motivation for vindication in a second chance that is rarely given in sports. This history however, is secondary to this year's team. "Every time you compete it is a different match and every year it is a new team," Thompson said. "We don't really keep track of what has happened in previous seasons." This season, the current Jumbo squad was unable to put Amherst away when they had the chance during the regular season in a home NESCAC conference game. Midway through October, the pesky crew from northern Mass. put an end to Tufts' seven game winning streak with a 3-1 victory (30-26, 24-30, 30-23, 30-22). Up until that point in the season, Tufts had been at the top of its game in terms of focus and intensity. The loss displayed a flatter, shaken Brown and Blue squad, marked by an increase in service (6) and serve receive (8) errors. "When we played Amherst here at home, we played terribly. It was by far our worst game of the year," Thompson said. After the match, the lapse of intensity on the court was and still is a struggle for the Jumbos. The team dropped closely matched games to the likes of Bates (1-3) and Wellesley (2-3)--crews it had defeated earlier in the season--as well as losing matches it definitely had the talent advantage over, such as Smith. "We have to keep the end of the season in perspective. We faced some difficult teams, which is what I wanted us to do this year, knowing we would take some hits in the form of losses because of it," Thompson said. That is not to say that this team has become weak. For every loss during the last three weeks of the season, there has also been a win, including an impressive victory over Brandeis (3-2) that directly followed the Amherst loss. At that point, Brandeis had been ranked the number four team in the region. This all translates into the fact that the Jumbos beat themselves in the regular season Amherst game, rather than the Jeffs being an unreachable competitor. In fact, the Jeffs have shown weaknesses in their last few matches, including four straight losses to Williams, MIT, Bates, and Colby. They have fallen from second place in the conference to fourth, setting the stage for Friday's match. Tufts has the talent to beat Amherst and push into Saturday's semi-final match. "What is most important for us is to not think about the other times and just come at this game like any other," senior tri-captain Danielle Cafasso said. "I definitely think we can beat Amherst." In order for that to happen, the defense will need to find a way to stop the Jeffs' outside hitting duo of junior Nicole Davidson and freshman Kristin Quinn, who had 17 and 16 kills apiece in the regular season battle. The Jeffs also boast a strong middle attack. The defense and specifically the block have been working hard this week to be at peak form. "We have been focusing on the block because the defense sets up around that," Cafasso said. "If the block is on, then the defense and the passing will follow." Overall, however, it will be whichever team decides to show up today that advances. "[Amherst] is a fighting team and they have tons of attitude," Thompson said. "They aren't going to want to be knocked out of the first round and neither do we. It is going to be quite a battle and I am looking forward to it." If Tufts moves into the semi-finals, barring any upsets, the road will be even more difficult as they will most likely face undefeated Williams. Williams is probably the only team in the NESCAC top five (including Bates, Colby, Amherst, and Tufts), that outshines any other in terms of talent (including two monster hitters and overall talents in junior OH Robin Young and freshman MH Joyia Chadwick)--and therefore any team that faces them will have to really dig deep to find the win.