Case of the missing Source issues comes to a close
November 3Nearly a year after the original incident, the case involving former Pan-African Alliance (PAA) President Carl Jackson and missing issues of The Primary Source has come to a close. The incident, which has received considerable campus and national attention, was finally resolved on Oct. 24 when Jackson, a senior, agreed to repay the Source $522 for 1,000 copies of the conservative journal's Nov. 22, 2001 edition, which went missing after they were distributed to campus buildings. The Dean of Students Office would not confirm the names of the students involved in the case but did say a resolution was reached. The Source alleges that Jackson stole the magazines, but Jackson has not admitted guilt. The publication determined damages for the stolen Nov. 22 Sources and other issues to be $2,000, but the settlement was only for Sources stolen on the one date. "A number of legal associates assured me that once organizations freely distribute magazines, flyers and such throughout campus, they forfeit any legal jurisdiction and the items become public property," Jackson explained in an e-mail yesterday. In total, at least 4,300 issues of several editions of the Source, paid for with money from the Student Activities Fee, disappeared last year. In the spring semester, while Jackson was studying abroad, at least 200 copies of the Jan. 31 issue went missing. One of the stolen print runs included an article arguing against affirmative action that some students found offensive. Last April, then-editor-in-chief of the Source, Sam Dangremond, said the he had no intention of pressing charges against whoever had taken the magazines because doing so "would be too vindictive." But several weeks ago, the publication's new editor-in-chief, Megan Liotta, filed a complaint with the University. Liotta said that Dangremond made the statement in a personal capacity, which meant she was free to pursue the issue this year. The Source offered to enter mediation with Jackson and gave him the option of agreeing to pay damages instead of going through a hearing. Jackson agreed. In mediation, the parties work from a set of stipulated facts; it is not a fact-finding process. Mediation was also the chosen method of resolving a similar case between The Observer and "Frat" in 2001. The mediation between Jackson and the Source staff was completed Oct. 21. According to Dean of Students Bruce Reitman, "A hearing would take place if either party is unhappy with the mediation. In this case, both parties were satisfied." Though Liotta said a more formal hearing would have been "a mess," Jackson said he felt the Source's claims against him could not have been substantiated in such a proceeding. Furthermore, the Source's key witness, junior Philipp Tsipman, is currently studying abroad and his testimony could only be submitted in writing. Jackson also said he chose mediation because he felt claims about the thefts of the magazine had been exaggerated while he was abroad last semester. "I sought to relieve the Tufts community from further acts of self-promotion and sensationalism on account of the Source," he said. Before both parties agreed to mediation, the Source considered other options to pursue the matter, according to Dangremond, who is now the Source's Editor Emeritus. "Some pro-bono lawyers from the Student Press Law Center had offered to help us bring charges against Jackson had he not agreed to mediation," Dangremond said. Jackson could also have been suspended, according to Dangremond, because the Student Judicial Handbook states that the punishment for stealing property worth upwards of $100 could result in suspension for a year or more. (Whether the issues were actually stolen, however, appears to be a point of contention.) But both parties considered suspension an inappropriate response. "We asked him that he pay us back $522 and we would consider it an admission of involvement rather than an admission of guilt," Liotta said. "We don't really care to suspend Carl." The Source first accused Jackson of stealing "at least one print run" in an article in its Jan. 31, 2002 issue, after it had learned of an e-mail in which Jackson allegedly claimed responsibility for taking the issues. Although the article also accused the PAA of helping Jackson, the complaint was filed against Jackson alone. Last semester, PAA members repeatedly denied involvement in the magazine disappearances, including those which occurred during the spring semester, when Jackson was not at Tufts. Liotta said that the Source is satisfied with the outcome of the proceedings. "It's exactly what we asked for," she said. "We are certainly not laughing all the way to the bank. We just wanted to be reimbursed for our stolen property." The administration determined the term's of Jackson's payment and is responsible from transferring the money from him to the Source. Daniel Fowler, Sarah Dalglish and Emily Chasan contributed to this article.

