Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

The Blue Death' author Morris taps into water-related health concerns

 

Earlier this month, each incoming Tufts student received a free copy of the book "The Blue Death: Disease, Disaster, and the Water We Drink" (2007) by Dr. Robert Morris, courtesy of the Tufts University Alumni Association and the Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service. The book, which is both captivating and shocking, tells the story of modern public water supplies and the fight against disease.

The book's narrative style, a presentation of the great minds that fought for clean water and the stubborn institutions that often opposed them, reads more like it was written by a seasoned author than an epidemiologist.

Dr. Morris' career has featured a stint at Tufts Medical School, where he taught from 1996-2002. He will return to the Hill on Tuesday, Sept. 2 at 7:00 p.m. in Cohen Auditorium for a lecture and book signing.

The Daily caught up with Dr. Morris over the phone to ask what Tufts students can do to promote clean drinking water and become active citizens.

 

 

 

Why do you think your book was chosen to give out to all incoming freshmen? What kind of message do you hope will resonate with this audience considering most do not have a developed interest in public health or epidemiology?I mean, they probably all drink water. But I guess it seems to me that the book intended to operate on several different levels. One is simply to tell people the story of drinking water, which … on the one hand is something that most people don't pay attention to and tend to take for granted and on the other hand is something that people should know about and it involves a fascinating story.

MA:

 

Given all the obstacles to change in the issues that you present, what strategy do you think it takes to induce change in an issue like drinking water?

RM:

And the other is persistence, and really part of the reason I wrote the book is to raise awareness and if you keep doing that, hopefully change can happen without a disaster.

 

There's two ways to change things. One is for a disaster to happen, and that kind of leaves everybody scurrying for the exits and wondering what the solution might be. And there are plenty of examples of that.

MA:

 

Are you optimistic about that? What kind of reaction has this book gotten from some of the same people who were critical of your earlier studies that were mentioned?

RM:

So I think within the drinking water establishment the response has been very defensive. On the other hand I do think there are people working in supplying drinking water who have been quite interested in the book. It probably says something that it was the Canadians that invited
me to speak.

 

I learned this only recently. I was invited to speak at a conference in Canada, the Canadian Water Research Network — all the people who do research on drinking water in Canada. The person who invited me said,‘You know, I'm involved with the American Waterworks Association … and I kept getting these e-mails that your book would be coming out and this is how I should respond to it and this is the news and reportings we should use to respond to the claims in the book, and when I got five or six of these e-mails I decided maybe I should get out and read this book.'

MA:

 

Do you think there are some valuable partners that exist among special interest groups whose priorities might lie in issues other than public health, like anti-bottled water groups?

RM:

The whole critique of Aquafina and Dasani as being just tap water…well, in fact, it's tap water that has been highly filtered after it comes out of the tap, which is unlike what most people drink from the tap. So I think there's an opportunity in the movement and in their reaction against bottled water in that it brings people's attention to the question, ‘Where should I get my water?'

In fact I think people drink bottled water for a variety of reasons. Among them I think is the fact that they're not totally comfortable with tap water, or they don't like the taste of chlorine in tap water.

So I think it's an opportunity to say ‘Yes, we should move away from bottled water,' but let's improve our tap water and find ways to improve the quality of tap water as good or better than what was in the bottled water …It's a much more efficient way to provide clean water than shipping around millions of tons of bottled water, not to mention the problem of making and disposing of bottles.

 

I think the movement against bottled water is certainly right; the basic idea is right. The response has tended to be we should just be drinking tap water. Our tap water is fine and bottled water is just tap water in a bottle. It can lead to not looking very closely at the issue.

MA

: Can you think of any specific groups that are playing a positive role in the improvement of public water systems? Who can ordinary citizens with no background in government or health turn to if they are looking to get involved?

 

RM:

 

There is a group called Clean Water Action. I ought to start something in health because there is a big gap there in terms of organizations for people interested in the issue, but the one organization I know of that works on this is Clean Water Action and they are actually an umbrella organization with a number of different projects on a number of varying degrees of drinking water issues.

 

 

 

Robert Morris:

But I think the book operates as an interesting story. It operates as a story about something that is important but people aren't terribly aware of ... There's an underlying theme to it which is that in general we tend to take things for granted; we tend to assume things are safe, and when somebody suggests they're not the initial reaction is ‘of course this is safe, we've been doing this for years.

Why wouldn't it be safe?' We've been drinking out of the Thames for a long time; why would you think it could be spreading cholera? Or we've been chlorinating our water for years, why would there be anything wrong with chlorine?

 

 

Mike Adams: