Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

And your posterity

    On Jan. 20, 2009, the president-elect will take an oath to preserve, to protect and to defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Contained therein are many articles, detailing the workings of Congress, the duties of the president and a rather thin description of the federal Judiciary. The primary function of these articles is to direct and to restrict the actions of elected officials. But the greatest calling, perhaps, of the Constitution is in its preamble. This preamble enumerates those values that set the United States apart from every other nation on earth at the time the Constitution was framed.     The preamble tells, as Schoolhouse Rock explains to us, "what those Founding Fathers set out to do." Most Americans, whose ancestors immigrated to this country from all over the world, have little in common with our founders other than goals for the nation. But the same ardor to achieve these goals is necessary to uphold the spirit of the nation created generations ago by the forefathers from whom we are separated by time, technology and twists of fate. Indeed, the preamble is the article of the Constitution that says what all Americans — not just the president — must do not only to be good citizens but to continue the American tradition.     We form a more perfect Union. We root out corruption. We discover greed within our government. We try to harmonize differences among those states of the Union with differing opinions. More than that, we have to get past the biases and prejudices of the founders, which may have prevented them from doing what was truly necessary to perfect the Union without fear, to change it without an inclination to preserve tradition for tradition's sake. We establish justice. We ensure not only that everybody has an equal right to take our government or fellow citizens to court but that those accused also have the right to stand up for themselves. We ensure domestic tranquility. We respect individual and group differences without resorting to violence. We come to understand each other as people, so that we might never wage racial or class warfare. We provide for the common defense. We decide how best to combine diplomacy and military defense. We promote the general welfare. We take steps to preserve those elements of our infrastructure that make it possible for us to prosper materially, and we encourage entrepreneurship while still caring for those in our society who are unable to care for themselves.         We secure the blessings of liberty, to ourselves and our posterity. We vote. We elect our leaders, just as those who came before us did. Who were they? They were the men who elected the first Congress. They were the nineteenth-century citizens who fought to remove property qualifications, poll taxes and literacy tests as a requirement for voter eligibility. They were newly emancipated blacks who cast ballots for a short time in the South. They were women who agitated for suffrage. They were civil rights activists in the 1960s who fought for the death of Jim Crow and the restoration of the constitutional rights of all Americans. They were the ballot counters in Florida in 2000.     And who is preserving our liberty today? They are the minimum-wage employees who work an hour later on Monday in order to vote on Tuesday. They are the soldiers who cast absentee ballots from Iraq and Afghanistan. They are immigrants, newly minted Americans, proudly voting in their first election. They are the soccer moms and dads on the sidelines discussing last night's election coverage. They are the Democrats of Idaho and the Republicans of Massachusetts who cast ballots, knowing that their candidate of choice will likely not win.         Who will preserve our liberty in the future? They will be the teens who skip primetime television in order to inform themselves by watching a debate. They will be Students for Obama and Students for McCain. They will be the Tufts Republicans. They will be the Tufts Democrats. They will be you and me. As registration deadlines approach, many of us look forward to voting in the first elections for which we will be eligible. But we would not be doing so were it not for the generations which have secured these blessings of liberty for us. Our posterity will no longer enjoy these blessings if we do not deliver on the great promise of this generation to engage itself in our republic. This is why we vote in states navy blue and burgundy red.     Thank your parents. Thank your grandparents. And thank all those who have come before you that have seen fit to do this. Your children will thank you too.


The Setonian
News

Fresina gives tips on advocating for policy changes

Lori Fresina, head of the New England branch of M&R Strategic Services, spoke yesterday about lobbying against tobacco companies, noting to a crowd of politically conscious upperclassmen the importance of active citizenship in influencing change on the state and local levels.


The Setonian
News

There's always 'room' for improvement

On April 4, freshman Gabe Bourgeois took his fate into his own hands. With a few choice keystrokes, he was able to direct the course of his freshman year social life.






The Setonian
News

Tufts Daily Events Calendar

Welcome to the Tufts Daily's new campus events calendar. Here, we'll be publishing information about upcoming events on and around campus.


The Setonian
News

Grant Beighley | Pants Optional

I can haz column? Yes, LOLcat, yes you may haz column. Even though my last two columns have been about music, I thought it was time for a change of pace, so here's something that everyone can relate to. Take your pants off, grab a glass of Shiraz and settle in for some of the most cerebral reading you're going to do this semester.


The Setonian
News

Haslett named to NESCAC All-Conference Second Team

    Senior co-captain Phil Haslett earned a selection on the NESCAC Golf All-Conference Second Team after his strong performance at the NESCAC Championship Qualifier last weekend.     Haslett was a model of consistency for the Jumbos, shooting scores of 76 and 77 on the par 71 Ralph Myhre Golf Course in Vermont to lead the Tufts squad. His two-day total of 153 strokes was good for 11 over par and a tie for 11th place.     Trinity and Middlebury came out best with the selections, with each placing two players on the First Team — Player of the Year with juniors Reid Longley and Jay Driscoll for the Bantams and senior Michael McCormick and sophomore Jim Levins for the Panthers.     The All-Conference teams are selected based on individual performance at the championship qualifier. Eight players at the tournament made the cut for the First Team, while nine players finished well enough to earn Second Team honors. Haslett is the first Jumbo to garner an All-NESCAC selection since the 2006 season.     Haslett had paced Tufts throughout the first half of the fall, including individual finishes of 13th at the Williams Invitational and 20th at the Bowdoin Invitational the week before.



The Setonian
News

Michael Sherry | Political Animal

It's easy to get so caught up in the fight for the presidency that we lose sight of thousands of races being run all across the country. The media is partially to blame — it hyperventilates over the latest insignificant daily gaffe, real or imagined, and breathlessly concludes that this newest controversy might spell the doom/seal the fate/save the skin of Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) or Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), especially among black voters/white voters/soccer moms/NASCAR dads/blue collars/white collars/terminally ill Albanian tuba players.


The Setonian
News

Evans Clinchy | Dirty Water

Howard-Pujols. Pedroia-Morneau. Webb-Lincecum. Lee-Halladay.     McCain-Obama.     Aren't you excited?


The Setonian
News

Ally Gimbel | When kiwis fly

One of the greatest things about studying abroad in an English-speaking ountry is that you already speak the local language. No need to struggle with rolling your r's and pronouncing dinde (not din-dee) correctly. You can order a meal and flirt with the waiter without sounding like a major idiot.     Unfortunately, even in an English-speaking country like New Zealand, you are never totally safe from foreign slang.     Encountering the local lexicon can be stressful at first, as many of the words and phrases we use on a daily basis in America mean entirely different things here. This mix-up usually leaves you either in a mortifying state of embarrassment or looking like a complete ass — or, on many occasions, both.     Say you find yourself "keen" (intent) on buying a fanny pack. When you ask the nice lady behind the counter where you might find one, she gives you a look of such abhorrence that you immediately "rattle your dags" (hurry) out of the shop.     If only you had known that in New Zealand, the word "fanny" is an offensive euphemism for a female's nether-regions, and when paired with "pack" creates a wide range of dirty interpretations, you might have chosen more carefully. Next time, remember to say "bum bag" if you want to avoid committing a conversational crime on top of your fashion felony.     Another way to learn a lot about Kiwi English is to take a walk down the aisles of your local grocery store. With your "trolley" (cart) in tow, you saunter through the produce section, passing by "kumara" (sweet potatoes), "capsicum" (bell peppers), "sultanas" (raisins) and "courgettes" (zucchini).     You search long and hard for granola but can only find "muesli" and stare for hours at the plethora of "tomato sauces," getting extremely frustrated that there's no ketchup for your French fries, which here are called "chips." If only Webster wrote a dictionary for New Zealand "dairies" (corner store markets, like 7-Eleven) you wouldn't be in such a "gherkin" (pickle).     And you better be careful when you tell your friends about the delicious golden kiwi you ate for "brekkie" (breakfast). Otherwise they will look at you with the same face you got from the saleswoman when you tried to buy a vahjayjay purse earlier. Without the suffix "fruit," in the description of your breakfast, most "Kiwis" (New Zealanders) will think you are talking about eating them. Either that or you fried up a flightless and endangered bird to put on toast. Nice one, slick.     Eventually, though, you will learn to adopt the new words for everyday things and even pick up all the "flashest" (coolest) phrases Kiwis use regularly. You and your friends can "have a smoko" (take a break) between classes, "whinge" (whine) about how much of a "waffler" (person who won't shut up) your lecturer is, then head out for a "takeaway pie" (mince pastry to go) and life will be "sweet as."     With that said, if there's one thing you must add to your vernacular while in New Zealand, it would be the word "as" at the end of every adjective. Last night at the club you weren't just drunk, you were "drunk as," and that cutie on the dance floor was "hot as, mate, eh?"     And there you have it — several fool-proof phrases to help you talk your way through New Zealand. Now just throw on your "togs" and "jandals" (swimsuit and sandals), toss some beers in the "chilly bin" (cooler) and head over to the beach with your mates. Armed with your knowledge of New Zealand slang, you'll fit right in.     Just don't feel "gutted" (depressed) if your "lame as" Yankee accent makes you sound like a "wanker" (jerk). And please, for the love of God, leave your "bum bag" at home.


The Setonian
News

Eagle Eye' fails to reach high-flying potential

"Eagle Eye" is the kind of popcorn movie one would expect during the summer -- devoid of a believable plot, but full of pretty people, fancy cars and big explosions. Unfortunately, it is the end of September, and this blockbuster just fails to be anything other than lackluster.


The Setonian
News

South Siders break through, but the road only gets tougher

With their backs to the wall on Sunday afternoon, the Chicago White Sox responded as any playoff team should -- they won out. The South Siders beat three different teams in three must-win games in three days, culminating in a 1-0 gem over the Minnesota Twins last night to seal their AL Central crown.


The Setonian
News

DAILY DIGITS

17: Rankings jump by the women's soccer team in the NCAA Div. III National Poll. After only receiving votes in the Sept. 23 NSCAA National Rankings of the country's 25 best squads last week, the Jumbos vaulted all the way to a ninth-slot tie with William Smith and Calvin in yesterday's poll following a pair of wins over then-national No. 8 Wheaton College and the Bates Bobcats on Homecoming weekend.


The Setonian
News

Grey's Anatomy' flatlines in its fifth season

Does anyone really believe that the popular leading male star on one of the network's most highly rated shows is going to die within the first five minutes of the season premiere? Probably not. Unfortunately, that's exactly how "Grey's Anatomy" begins, setting the tone for the over the top, yet underwhelming two-hour season premiere.


The Setonian
News

Jumbos pound Beavers 3-0 to preserve perfect 5-0 record

After jumping from being unranked in the national polls to sharing the No. 9 spot with William Smith and Calvin in the NCAA Div. III poll in just one week, the women's soccer team kept piling up the accomplishments yesterday with a 3-0 win over NEWMAC opponent Babson.


The Setonian
News

Film adaptation of 'Choke' not gourmet

There's an elephant in the room, and his name is Tyler Durden. Though the first rule of reviewing "Choke" should be, "You don't talk about 'Fight Club,'" Chuck Palahniuk adaptations come along only once a decade, so it's hard to avoid holding this up against the earlier film. Though this adaptation is slightly more faithful, Clark Gregg's "Choke" does not quite work as a complete movie in the same way Fincher's "Fight Club" (1999) did. Its story is scatterbrained and unfocused, which is disappointing in a movie this short. It does, however, boast a winning cast and enough engaging scenes to make it worth checking out.


The Setonian
News

Republicans not to blame for current economic situation

    When I first read that House Republicans, along with nearly half of House Democrats, had voted down the proposed Wall Street bailout, my initial reaction was one of surprise, even shock. After all, the President of the United States, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and the leadership of both parties in Congress had assured the American people that this measure was absolutely necessary to save the American economy. How, then, could 228 legislators vote it down?     On further reflection, it occurred to me that perhaps what we witnessed on Monday was not the mindless jump of 228 lemmings over a financial cliff, but rather an astonishing act of political courage. For weeks, the American people have been bombarded with attempts by Democrats like House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) and Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) to lay the current economic mess at the feet of President George W. Bush and Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). They blame Republicans for deregulating the financial markets and turning a blind eye to corruption. Though many Republicans do bear at least some blame for the meltdown, the charges Democrats have leveled at Republicans apply far more accurately to themselves.     The trouble brewing in our financial industry has not been a secret to Republicans. McCain gave a speech on the Senate floor in 2005 demanding that Congress step in to stop the abuses of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, while at the same time, Barack Obama was the second-largest recipient of political contributions from Fannie and Freddie.     In 2004, a delegation of House Republicans, led by Reps. Ed Royce (R-Calif.), Richard Baker (R-La.) and Don Manzullo (R-Ill.), called for an investigation into the practices of both of those institutions and demanded that reforms be implemented. Predicting that these institutions would collapse and that the government would try to stick the taxpayers with the bill, the Republicans called for a new, tougher regulatory system.         They were shouted down by Democrats who claimed that the Republicans were wasting everyone's time trying to "fix something that wasn't broken," to quote Maxine Waters (D-Calif.). Frank said there was no evidence of "safety and soundness issues." Many Democrats went much further to silence dissent: Rep. Lacy Clay (D-Mo.) likened Republicans to the Klan, suggesting that the entire issue was a "political lynching of Franklin Raines" (the African-American CEO of Freddie Mac). Thus by using obfuscation and intimidation, the Democrats succeeded in foiling Republican attempts to fix things before they got too bad.     So now Democratic chickens have come home to roost, but like the individuals who bought houses out of their price range, and the banks that sold to them, the Democrats, along with the Bush administration, have thrown personal responsibility to the wind and have passed the buck to the American people. Until Monday, it looked like we were going to have to foot the bill: $700 billion.     This proved too much for many representatives who had come into office on the promise of a smaller, fiscally responsible government. Under President Bush, federal spending has increased dramatically. With Bush and Pelosi, these Republicans have been caught between a rock and a hard place. While we are fighting two extremely costly wars, they have been forced to also swallow Bush's Medicare prescription drug entitlement and huge agricultural subsidies. They have watched as the new Democratic Congress pulled out most of the remaining stops to reckless spending. Frank spearheaded a $300 billion bailout of those individuals who bought houses they couldn't pay for. Last week, Congress decided to toss $25 billion to the American auto industry to subsidize its penchant for making cars Americans won't drive.     In short, House Republicans had had enough. In the midst of a general panic, while most were loudly demanding that the government step in and make the problem go away, they kept their cool and refused to bow to pressure. They recognized that every time there is an economic crisis, the shortsighted see it as evidence that the government should go still further in the socialization of the economy. Knowing that the injection of politics into the market had greatly contributed to "housing bubble," they balked at further politicizing and collectivizing the solution. The financial institutions had engaged in unsound practices, and it is only natural that they must now face the consequences of the correction. Moreover, the Republicans questioned why irresponsible borrowers and reckless lenders are receiving so much public largesse, while the average American, who chose not to buy a house he couldn't afford, and who decided not to spend money he didn't have on get-rich-quick schemes, is now paying for the foolishness of others.     It took remarkable courage and integrity for these representatives to defeat the bill that many said was the last hope for our economy. Though the doomsayers predicted a crash in the days following the bill's rejection, by Tuesday at noon, stocks had actually risen and the dollar had jumped against the Euro. It seems that even without the heavy hand of government guiding it, there is still some resiliency in the American economy. Moreover, a stand has been made for personal responsibility. Long accused of favoring wealthy corporations over average Americans, the Republicans have taken this chance to prove their integrity; just as they opposed government unduly burdening private enterprise, they also abhor government propping up unsound businesses. For their political courage, America owes these lawmakers a debt of gratitude. Michael Hawley is a sophomore who has not yet declared a major. He is also the President of Tufts Republicans.