What students really need
November 6It's clear from an account of their meeting this past weekend that the Board of Trustees has several good ideas with respect to brightening Tufts' future. In particular, the open courseware initiative is a welcome sign of an innovative approach to advancing the University's prestige while at the same time practicing responsible global citizenship. Pierre Omidyar must be proud. However, student representation on the Board of Trustees is of concern. It is not at all evident that the three TCU representatives are promoting solutions to problems which are high on the average student's list of priorities. Cho Ling, who sits on the Academic Affairs Committee, has rightly identified that changes are necessary within the International Relations program. However, he does not identify what exactly is wrong with the program, nor does his plan seem to solve the real problems that are rampant within IR. As the Daily has pointed out previously, the IR major suffers from incoherency and interdisciplinary overreach. The curriculum needs to be overhauled to realign IR with the field of political science and prevent it from a fate of academic irrelevance. It is not immediately clear how a long-term plan to create the College of International Affairs or to affiliate the IR program with the Fletcher School would make the major more coherent. A College of International Affairs would be redundant and inappropriately specialize a student's degree if it only encompassed what is currently a single major. Why, then, could there not be a College of Economic Affairs from which students could choose among very narrow fields as their major, or a College of Art History in which students could major in Dadaism, or a College of American Studies which offered a major in 1960s social movements? These types of programs are the domain of post-graduate study. Even assuming that the creation of a College of International Affairs would improve the IR program by some unseen mechanism, Ling still ignores IR's most pressing concern. He should be pushing in his spring presentation to the Board of Trustees to support drastic curriculum reforms, instead of trying to implement a long-term restructuring which does not address incoherence. Laura Fruitman's support for Phase III of the construction of the Campus Center also appears to be out of touch with student concerns. As other board members pointed out, the funding required to add office space and mailboxes could be used on other projects, such as installing a wireless network on campus, improving academics, or bringing Tufts' aquatic facilities out of the Stone Age by renovating or replacing Hamilton Pool. This is not to say that the student representatives were completely out of line with respect to addressing important issues. The lack of on-campus housing is clearly a pressing concern for many students, and the discussion regarding marketing Tufts degrees is very welcome. However, for the next meeting the representatives should think long and hard about whether or not they are accurately representing the views of the average student.

