News
April 17
"Be worried. Be very worried," exhorts the cover of the Apr. 3 issue of Time magazine. Were the editors of Time referring to a terrorist threat? An outbreak of the bird flu? Nope. They were referring to climate change. Mainstream media outlets, thankfully, are finally starting to realize the seriousness of the climate crisis we face. In the past few months, TV networks from PBS to TBS to Fox News have all featured programs on climate change, and HBO joins the fray this Saturday (Earth Day) with the Laurie David-produced special "Too Hot Not to Handle." "An Inconvenient Truth," starring none other than Al Gore in his post-2000 reincarnation as a climate crusader, hits theaters on May 26, and scarcely a week goes by these days without the New York Times reporting a new scientific finding confirming that climate change is already upon us. All this newfound media attention is cause for hope that the American public will become increasingly galvanized to demand solutions to climate change. In the absence of federal government action on climate change, state, community and campus leaders are already addressing the issue head-on. Maryland recently joined seven other Northeast states in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative in a collective effort to reduce power plant pollution, 224 U.S. mayors (including those of Medford and Somerville) have committed to meeting Kyoto Protocol emissions reduction targets, and youth coalitions such as Energy Action are mobilizing college students to transform their campuses into models of sustainability. Even this year's Spring Fling headliner Guster is spreading the climate gospel with their "Campus Consciousness" tour this spring. These are just a few snapshots of a rapidly growing grassroots movement for climate solutions. Here on the Tufts campus, Environmental Consciousness Outreach (or ECO, of which I am a member) is doing its part to tackle climate change. Last year we ran a referendum vote campaign asking if students would support a small student fee increase (no more than $10/semester) to go towards purchasing wind power, a clean, renewable energy source that does not emit climate-warming greenhouse gases. Student turnout was an incredible 40 percent, with a whopping 88 percent voting in favor (for comparison, the turnout in last year's Tufts Community Union (TCU) presidential election was 33 percent). Unfortunately, the results of the non-binding referendum were overturned on a technicality earlier this month, but ECO plans to have a re-vote tomorrow in conjunction with this year's TCU election. Another strong showing of support from students will send a powerful message to the Tufts administration that we want them to take meaningful action on climate change. Many of Tufts' peer institutions, such as UPenn, Yale, Duke, Swarthmore and American, are currently purchasing some form of clean, climate-friendly energy. Tufts, which has committed to the Kyoto Protocol and expressed its commitment to sustainability on numerous occasions, should do the same. It is clear that climate change is an issue of global justice: Despite emitting the fewest greenhouse gases, developing countries are the most vulnerable to climate impacts such as rising sea levels, the spread of disease, worsening air quality, heat-related deaths and natural disasters. As youth, we are also a vulnerable population that will bear the brunt of these climate impacts in decades to come. We therefore have a political and moral responsibility to stay informed and inject our voices into the climate debate. As part of our ongoing efforts to educate the Tufts community about environmental issues, ECO is sponsoring two climate-related events this week as part of our annual EarthFest celebration. Today from 7 - 9 p.m. in Pearson 106, civil engineering professor Paul Kirshen and Tufts Climate Initiative staff member Ramsay Huntley will speak on a panel entitled "Climate Change in Context: Boston, Tufts & YOU." Tomorrow, from 4-6 p.m. in the Crane Room, we will present "Boiling Point Two," a film featuring a talk by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Ross Gelbspan about climate change politics, impacts and solutions. Both events promise to stimulate exciting discussion about how we can engage climate change issues on both personal and political levels. The political dimensions of climate change cannot be overstated. Climate change is not merely an environmental issue; it is a moral issue that challenges us to imagine our planet's future and demands a political solution. The amazing grassroots work on climate change in our states, campuses and communities must be mirrored in Washington, D.C. if we are to have any hope of stopping the most serious impacts of climate change. The United States, which emits 25 percent of the world's greenhouse gases despite representing only five percent of the world's population, must change its course of inaction and institute a national climate policy. History, however, tells us that social and political change does not come unless it is demanded. On Apr. 20, use your TCU ballot to encourage the Tufts administration to purchase wind power. For the rest of 2006 and beyond, challenge your elected officials and candidates running for office to make climate change into an election issue. A politician without a plan to address our planet's future is not worthy of our vote. If we do not take action on climate change, humanity and the environment will suffer immense consequences. But if we deal with the climate crisis in the right way, we have the potential to usher in a new wave of technological innovation and job creation and, in the words of Ross Gelbspan, "create the basis for a far wealthier, more equitable, and ultimately, much more peaceful world." The choice is ours - which one will it be?