Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Opinion

The Setonian
Editorial

What should Wall Street do next?

Merrill Lynch, Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers are gone off the board. The most dynamic twins since Mary Kate and Ashley, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, have left an enormous crater in the belly of the United States financial landscape. Then the $85 billion bailout deal for the insurance conglomerate American International (AIG) seemed to push the limit. And for the encore, a historical $700 billion federal bailout to get Wall Street back to even blindsides the already overburdened American taxpayer.



The Setonian
Opinion

Politics are the opiate of the people

    One of the most frequently quoted statements of Karl Marx is: "Religion is the opiate of the people."     In context, Marx was speaking of religion as a condition that arose to help humanity cope with its struggles. He believed that calling on mankind to give up religion would also mean calling upon it to give up the conditions of life that require a coping mechanism.     There is a measure of ambiguity about the usage of opium in the statement because, in Marx's day, opium was legally available and widely prescribed.     In any case, the metaphor of opium can be seen in Marx's view of religion as being a painkiller and something that dulls the mind.     More than a century and a half later, I would like to amend Marx's statement to better fit our modern American context: Politics are the opiate of the people.     What do I mean?     There is this false optimism that somehow our political process will offer the cure for all that ails our society. If we only elect the right candidate, we can solve the problems we face. What ensues is mostly an attempt by either candidate to cast the other as a wrong choice that will bring certain doom.     This year is more of the same. In the end, there are no substantial differences between either Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) or Sen. Barack Obama (R-Ill.) that will result in any real discernible outcome for the American people.     You will either get more war in Afghanistan or more war in Iraq. You will either get more spending on expansive government programs or more corporate welfare. Both will push for more regulation on financial institutions without addressing the subsidies and easy credit offered by the government to many of these institutions. Both will offer more aid to countries such as Georgia while aggressively posturing against Russia and Iran.     The only real division that can be drawn between these candidates is concerning social and moral issues, most of which have no business being in the federal domain. That is where people line up to make their stand, fighting for the "heart and soul" of the nation.     This is the opiate of the people. They are drugged into believing that these are the issues that will guarantee the future vitality of our nation. They are corralled into voting booths to support the candidate that supports their issue or to vote against the candidate that opposes their issue.     I cannot count the number of times I've talked to Republicans who curse those "liberal Democrats," or how many times I've listened to Democrats curse the Republican policies.     The reality is that most people are not Republicans and Democrats; they are anti-Republicans and anti-Democrats, and they vote accordingly. They are convinced by the campaigns not to vote for what they believe in, but to vote against what they do not.     This is what is passing for democracy in our nation, and the people are distracted by the false feud that exists between the two parties.     That is not to say that we do not need the voices of Democrats and Republicans, but we do not need them to be our only voices, especially when much of what they are saying is the same.     Until we can break the stranglehold these two entities have on our politics, we'll never see true "change" in this country.     It is an uphill battle, for sure, but it is one that is definitely worth fighting for the sake of principle and to "secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity" as the Founders put it.     And yet, we still find ourselves taking the opium every election cycle, hoping that somehow this dose will do for us what the last dose didn't.     Here's to hoping we'll leave the bottle on the shelf the next time around.


The Setonian
Opinion

Letter from a Democrat

As I scanned the op-ed section of The Tufts Daily last week, I reached an article on the virtues of Gov. Sarah Palin (R-Alaska), Sen. John McCain's (R-Ariz.) vice-presidential nominee ("The Democrats' Palin problem," Sept. 8). Though the bent seemed conservative, I ignored any compulsion I had to turn the page and, instead, read through to gather whatever points could be gained from the piece. I found the article well-written, logically presented and politically relevant.


The Setonian
Opinion

Fall 2008 report on the state of the Tufts Community Union Treasury

Now that the library steps are frequented by students flocking to class, and Tuftslife.com is flooded with countless events for us to occupy our time before, between, after and maybe even during those classes, I think it is appropriate to share directly with the student body the status of these activities in light of the events of the past few months. As Tufts Community Union (TCU) Treasurer, I am required to regularly report on the "State of the Treasury" to the Senate. I gave the first of these updates last night, and I believe it appropriate to share some of my comments with the greater Tufts community.


The Setonian
Opinion

Conservative name-calling

I've never been shy about expressing my political ideology and personal values — especially during this election year. If you find yourself engaged in a conversation with me, you would swear that I had been raised in America's heartland. I identify myself as a simple girl who grew up in a humble Christian household, where family values and hard work were stressed. A strong supporter of American troops and military power, I feel grateful to be living in a country where freedom is not deemed a privilege but an inalienable right. I can identify a soybean crop at the drop of a hat (and tell you the optimal conditions needed for growth). Oh, yeah, and I'm finally getting a gun license this year.



The Setonian
Opinion

Thought you should know

In the last few days, Sen. John McCain's (R-Ariz) campaign has been criticized for distorting the truth, obfuscating the facts and, in some cases, just making stuff up. We at the Daily thought it only fair to even the score.


The Setonian
Opinion

Corrections

In yesterday's paper, the lead picture was attributed to Danai Macridi. It was actually taken by Annie Wermiel. In the Sept. 12th article "Record turnout marks freshman TCU Senate contest," Elliott McCarthy's name was misspelled.



The Setonian
Opinion

From a spurned lover

At first sight I fell for you     Your warm glow apparent from the start Roomy and cozy, you welcomed me at once We had everything in common     School spirit and an appreciation of puns         A love of great tea and drinkable coffee The need to indulge with a chocolate chip muffin But also have the option to take the high road (whole wheat bagel, anyone?) O Brown and Brew!     Through good times and bad, you were there For naps and group projects         Breakdowns and meet-ups     I turned to you And I supported you     When you never had the butterscotch syrup, I did not abandon you When the bad men came to rid you of your worn-out (but beloved) upholstered appendages,     I wept for you but did not look away Why do things seem different between us now? You are so unavailable.     What changed during the summer? Whence your rosy demeanor? You don't want to see me on weekends, and you kick me out earlier than before.         I can change. I'll shell out for the iced mocha or toffee coffee, I'll put your needs first. I've been selfish, I admit, but I promise to try harder. Come back to me, B, like in that Kid Rock song with Sheryl Crow. You love that song.      Don't make me seek comfort in the arm(chair)s of another.


The Setonian
Opinion

Time for a deep breath

Although September is barely halfway over, the yearly scramble is already underway. We at the Daily can almost hear the collective wheels of the senior class turning as students begin to wonder what it is they will do in that vast abyss commonly known as "life."


The Setonian
Opinion

Free speech must be protected

On Monday, the Task Force on Freedom of Expression created by President Lawrence Bacow released a Draft Declaration on Freedom of Expression and Inquiry at Tufts University. This document was the result of almost two years of discontent and hand-wringing after a Tufts journal, The Primary Source, published an offensive Christmas carol in December 2006. Some have faulted this document for offering little in the way of explicit regulations that can define the extent to which freedom of speech will be protected. But I argue that the document is very clear in its intentions and goes too far in constraining freedom of speech at Tufts University.


The Setonian
Opinion

The Democratic energy fumble

In this election of "hope" and "change," it is easy to believe the Democrats' energy policy is the right solution for our country. But is it possible that the Republicans, the party so many have grown to despise, could actually have the right energy policy? And if so, would people be too caught up in "change" to acknowledge that the Democrats have become too idealistic? The Republicans have crafted an energy policy that deals with both supply and demand — drilling and alternate fuels — while the Democrats have stubbornly refused to acknowledge the realities of the world we live in.


The Setonian
Opinion

A watered-down response to on-campus speech

Yesterday, the Task Force on Freedom of Expression released its long-awaited draft to the Tufts community. The document, largely devoid of substance, was focused primarily on pinning down a working definition of the respect Tufts students owe to one another.


The Setonian
Opinion

Letter to the Editor

I thank Matthew Ladner for his Sept. 8 op-ed "The Democrats' Palin Problem". It was hard-hitting — except in his failure to directly level a single criticism of the GOP's ticket. And it offered powerful arguments for  why Ms. Palin will, come Jan. 21, be suited to assume the presidency if needed: She led a "successful campaign against corruption" (though Mr. Ladner offers no source for this statement), she has a  "warm," "refreshing" personality and she demonstrated "leadership" during her RNC speech (presumably by guiding the adoring audience to applause). Palin hasn't served on the Senate's Foreign Relations Committee, as Obama does, nor does she have any notable foreign policy experience, but she does bear an "indifference to intense scrutiny," which, as President Bush has shown, inevitably leads to excellence in public service. Well, Mr. Ladner certainly has me convinced!


The Setonian
Opinion

Public Speech: A Public Good

On Sept. 2, The New York Times ran a front-page article entitled "Palin Disclosures Raise Questions on Vetting," touching off a media controversy on the negative coverage surrounding John McCain's (R-Ariz.) pick for vice president, Gov. Sarah Palin (R-Alaska). Predictably, the Times' Web site was bombarded by comments alleging liberal bias — 1,068 at last count — and irate letters to the editor filled the next day's opinion papers. Readers clearly had a lot to say, but aside from short letters and talking heads on conservative television shows, they had little way of expressing their frustration.


The Setonian
Opinion

The power of the purse strings

For some, Tufts' relationship with local communities is defined by the blare of loud party music and the more-than-occasional ambulance siren. But behind the scenes, the situation is much less strained. Jumbos have a history of being active in Medford and Somerville, and the university has recently complemented this service by reaching into its pocketbook to help local governments make it through a tenuous financial situation. While we respect arguments that the money could have been better used on the Hill, we support the university's decision, as it will allow for the continuation of important public services.


The Setonian
Opinion

Corrections

The headline of "Local rapist to be arraigned today," an article on the front page of our Sept. 8 issue, incorrectly identified Michael    Mahoney as a rapist. He is accused of rape, but has not been convicted. The headline of "Green Line extension end point may be announced this week: One option is at College and Boston Avenues," an article on the front page of our Sept. 8 issue, contained an error. Officials may announce the end point of the Green Line extension project as early as next week — not this one.


The Setonian
Opinion

Brewing up ideas for social space

    Recently, Brown and Brew has begun closing at 11 p.m. during the week and remaining closed on weekends, much to the chagrin of the five or six students who frequent the Brew that late. Yes, there are occasionally students between about 213 College Ave Avenue and Halligan Hall at 12:30 a.m. on Tuesday nights, jonesing for a Roadrunner and a packet of pita chips, and they have found their hopes for a coffee-based beverage and a collegiate atmosphere most cruelly dashed.     While debate has raged fiercely in the last six months over the wisdom of removing the couches from our venerable coffeehouse (some students called the move "bad" because the couches were comfortable; others called it "good" because the couches were gross), arguments reached a shrill but decidedly muted crescendo in the last week as the management of Brown and Brew elected to shut down operations after 11 p.m. and on weekends. Thwarted Tuftonians can be found wandering the streets, complaining that coffee from Hodgdon is "too commercial," wallowing sadly in their collective despair.     In all seriousness, the new closing times affect very few Tufts students, although the Brew does serve a segment of campus that is removed from other dining establishments.     In fact, to hear people talk about the charm of Brown and Brew is to be bombarded with names of other such hangouts and eateries: The Tower Café has a "library atmosphere," Hotung is too distracting and the rest of the campus center is too boring/loud/quiet/small. Brown and Brew too receives its fair amount of critiques from students who find it too far away for their needs.     The common thread in such complaints is that there simply is not a central place on campus that fulfils students' needs, be it for socializing, studying or staving off starvation.     The campus center, designed (in theory) to fill these needs, is woefully divided. If you want to do a mix of socializing and studying, you often need to physically move from place to place.     What Tufts needs is a central location where students can do all of the above — not in separate rooms, but in a big, open atrium where hundreds of students can gather without feeling that they are violating the "purpose" of the room. The current campus center, constructed in the 1970s in a way that suggests an administration's fear of rioting, simply cannot serve this purpose.     The Hotung renovations are excellent — for Hotung. The change in furniture in front of the Commons is an improvement — for the Commons. The game room has enhanced equipment, but it is not big enough or open enough to be inviting to a large number of students. Right now, Tufts has a place where students can find everything that they need, but what Tufts really needs is a place students can enter without a purpose and find something to do. That is where you will find the Tufts students of tomorrow.     This is a dream that will likely be unfulfilled; it is an enormous project that would require huge amounts of money that is currently earmarked for a new sports center, new science corridors and other worthy projects. But it is a dream nonetheless. We at the Daily offer this thought not with an expectation that we will see it completed, but with a hope that it will be considered. Until that happens, you can find us … well, somewhere.


The Setonian
Opinion

Letter to the Editor

    I wanted to thank the Daily for its coverage of State Rep. Carl Sciortino. As both the article and editorial noted, Carl has been an advocate for improved health care and public transportation. What neither mentioned is the effort invested by Carl to bring young people into the political process, especially students at Tufts. Beyond regularly visiting campus and working closely with the Tisch College of Citizenship and Public Service's Institute of Political Citizenship internship program, Carl has used his time on Beacon Hill to help college students like us be better citizens.     In one example from this summer, he fought hard for a bill that would have allowed same-day voter registration, a boon particularly for out-of-state students who tend to face higher registration barriers. He quite literally was fighting to help us become part of the process. I encourage you to join me and my friends in the Tufts Democrats to do what we can to make sure Carl wins his primary next week and allow him to continue to both engage us and be engaged by us.


Op-ed submissions are an integral part of our connection with you, our readers. As such, we would like to clarify our guidelines for submitting op-eds and what you can expect from the process.

Read More
The Tufts Daily Crossword with an image of a crossword puzzle
The Print Edition
Tufts Daily front page