Skip to Content, Navigation, or Footer.

Archives

The Setonian
News

Panel did not contain any controversy

I am writing in response to the Oct. 29 article, "Controversial Panel questions homosexuality's health risks." Although there definitely has been controversy surrounding this panel, there certainly wasn't any in it. All three of the panelists were in agreement when they attacked homosexuality, with one saying that "there is no such thing as gay people." The panel was sponsored by the Tufts Republicans, and Nicholas Boyd, their president, was quoted as saying that the panelists were examples of the conservative views that his group wants to bring to campus, and that discussions are only made richer by bringing in all views. My question is, when does expressing a point of view become discrimination? It seems that these days, the last holdout of socially acceptable discrimination is against homosexuals. If the panel was vilifying inter-racial relationships, or relationships between people of different religions, would Tufts students think it was right that it was being held on campus? Whether our differences are based on race, religion or sexual preference, is it ever acceptable that a group of students be singled out in this fashion? LGBT students are part of the Tufts community, and it's wrong to bring their attackers here to demean them, without even giving them a voice on the panel. If Mr. Boyd truly wanted to encourage rich discussions including different points of view, he would have asked an advocate of the LGBT community to participate. I think that the Tufts Republicans need to consider just for a moment how it would feel to be singled out as leading a deviant lifestyle in the Tufts community, where all students are meant to be accepted and respected. The LGBT community is fully aware of the intolerance that exists against them in this society, but to have these criticisms brought into their own home by their peers must make it many times more hurtful. The Tufts Republicans might do well to rethink the kinds of panelists they bring to our school, and the message they send to others when they deliberately single out and disparage a group in the Tufts community.Maggie ClaryLA '07


The Setonian
News

Inside the NBA | Off-season of player movement gives NBA whole new dimension

With the NHL in the midst of a lockout that threatens to cancel the entire season, basketball will likely be the only major professional sport played over the winter. With that in mind, there are several subplots that should make the upcoming season an exciting one. After an off-season in which many players switched teams, there should be a number of clubs in contention for the playoffs and championship. A significant change in the league is the return of a team to North Carolina, where the Charlotte Bobcats will become the NBA's 30th franchise. Charlotte hasn't had a team since the Hornets were relocated to New Orleans two years ago. The Bobcats, led by rookie Emeka Okafor, should have some growing pains in their inaugural season and shouldn't be in the playoff hunt. However, expect them to improve as the season progresses. Another development in the off-season was the movement of several big name players to new teams. The biggest stars traded were Shaquille O'Neal, who went to the Miami Heat from the L.A. Lakers, and Tracy McGrady, who was dealt to the Houston Rockets by the Orlando Magic. In addition, Kenyon Martin was acquired by the Denver Nuggets, Jamal Crawford went to New York Knicks and Steve Francis and Cuttino Mobley were moved to Orlando when the Rockets got McGrady. The best free agent to change teams was Steve Nash, who signed with the Phoenix Suns. Quentin Richardson also went to Phoenix as a free agent, with Brent Barry heading to the San Antonio Spurs and Antonio McDyess going to the Detroit Pistons. These personnel changes are going to shift the balance of power between the conferences, as well as within them. The Western Conference will be the stronger and more balanced of the conferences, but the order of that balance will be far from what it was last season. The Minnesota Timberwolves return all of their starters from last year and will be among the top of the conference from the start. The same goes for the Spurs, who lost Hedo Turkoglo and Kevin Willis but made a great move in signing Brent Barry. Houston, with McGrady to accompany Yao Ming, will be a serious force in the conference and will battle with last year's heavyweights. The Sacramento Kings will be in the hunt as well, but will need a healthy Chris Webber to vie for the title. The Suns should step it up this year after signing Nash and Richardson to accompany Amare Stoudamire and Shawn Marion. Expectations in Denver are higher than ever since Kenyon Martin was acquired over the winter. The Dallas Mavericks were involved in their usual high volume off-season activity. Despite losing Nash, they acquired Jason Terry from the Atlanta Hawks, who should be a suitable replacement. The Memphis Grizzlies will continue to improve under coach Hubie Brown and will be battling for one of the last playoff spots. The Utah Jazz added Carlos Boozer and Mehmet Okur to shore up their frontcourt, and will be hungry for a postseason berth after falling just short last year. The defending conference champion Lakers will need a monstrous season from Kobe Bryant now that Shaq is gone, as well as solid contributions from Lamar Odom, Caron Butler and Brian Grant, who were sent from Miami in exchange for O'Neal. Bryant must have amazing individual numbers while his team fights with the Grizzlies, Jazz and Mavs for one of the last playoff spots. The Eastern Conference will have a different landscape as well in 2004-05. The defending champion Pistons will be at the forefront, returning the core of last year's winning team while adding Antonio McDyess for support. The Indiana Pacers traded for Stephen Jackson in their bid to knock off the Pistons this year, and will challenge them for the crown again this time around. Shaq immediately makes Miami a contender. He should have a standout season in a conference that has far fewer talented centers than the West. O'Neal is in outstanding physical shape, and with the help of Dwyane Wade and Eddie Jones, the Heat will be a serious threat to the Pistons. The rest of the playoff picture is fairly wide open. The New Jersey Nets won't make another title run without Martin and Kerry Kittles but should be in the playoffs as long as Jason Kidd stays healthy. The Philadelphia Sixers have a deep bench and Allen Iverson still leads the way. Orlando will be a fun team to watch, with newcomers Francis and Mobley, and could make a run at the postseason despite losing McGrady. The hometown Boston Celtics should be vying for a playoff spot with the addition of Gary Payton, a healthy Raef LaFrentz, and promising rookies Delonte West and Tony Allen. Jamal Crawford should make the Knicks a lock for a playoff spot again, and will likely form a great scoring duo with Stephan Marbury. The Milwaukee Bucks, coming off a surprise playoff run last year, and the Cleveland Caveliers, led by LeBron James, will be among those competing for playoff spots despite some frontcourt losses. It should be an enjoyable and unpredictable 2004-05 NBA season. Expect the Pistons and Timberwolves to meet in the finals, with the Wolves taking home the hardware.


The Setonian
News

International governance: fact or fiction?

Governance, as opposed to governments, has received a great deal of attention in recent years. To some degree, it has even featured into the recent presidential debates. Senator John Kerry's now infamous allusion to a "Global Test" raised the issue of unelected, non-American entities influencing American policy. Those entities include not only other countries under the guise of the so-called "international community," but presumably also non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and international organizations (IOs). Prior to the 1990s, governance and governments were treated as inextricable concepts. Simply put, the former was a function of the latter. In the 1990s, theorists extended the mantle of governance to non-governmental groups and institutions. This involved a broadening of the definition of governance. Previously, the definition of governance had a limited scope and meant the act of or the authority to govern, administrate or regulate. Its meaning was broadened through the interpolation of the amorphous concepts of justificatory discourse, inter-subjectivity and interpretative communities. In his article "Security Council Deliberations: The Power of a Better Argument," Professor Ian Johnstone of the Fletcher School argued that justificatory discourse is the process of interrelating international law through discussion and argument undertaken by interpretative communities, made up of interested parties such as governments, lawyers, civil society advocates and international institutions. This interpretation exists in the context of inter-subjectivity, defined as the engagement in a collectively meaningful activity. Through such a lens, he argues, it becomes possible to conceive of individuals, civil societies, international institutions and transnational corporations all playing legitimate and crucial roles in global and regional governance. Ngaire Woods of Oxford University has distinguished between international governance - which refers to interstate relations within international organizations - and global governance - which refers to links between individuals and organizations on a global scale. She has identified participation, ownership and accountability as components of good governance. The question to ask, then, is whether non-governmental institutions have the capacity to manifest those virtues and to do so with the same or almost the same ability of governments. While NGOs and IOs may enhance participation through advocacy and political agitation, it is difficult to ascribe to any non-governmental entities the authoritative ownership of a particular issue. Accountability is also hard to assign, possibly because the concept is often vaguely defined. In sharp contrast, governments are participatory because of their nature, usually have the prerogative of ownership and are subject, particularly in democracies, to the test of accountability. Anne Marie Slaughter's book "The State Strikes Back" has countered that what is in fact occurring is less a loss of power by states than a new distribution of power between states through the practice of "trans-governmentalism." In this system, the state maintains its viability as the primal actor of governance only through the function of interstate cooperation and collaboration, which she refers to as "networking." Slaughter, building upon the pretext of neo-functionalism and complex interdependence, as developed by the Kennedy School's Joseph Nye and others, describes how governments network and form linkages that characterize international regimes. Slaughter points out the "democratic deficit" of non-government actors, concluding that "citizens of liberal democracies will not accept any form of international regulation they cannot control." Government networks, in her vision, represent the future of regional and global governance. Non-governmental entities suffer from questions of legitimacy, a paucity of means to validate their significance, a lack of operational means to own issues in an authoritative way and an almost complete reliance on governments to translate their findings into meaningful action. It may be impossible to dismiss completely the contribution of non-governmental entities. Yet, it is equally impossible to deny that their role, while often loudly acclaimed, is vague in its place, unclear in its degree of significance and dubious in its claims to democratic legitimacy. States in their operational form as governments remain the best structured, legally valid and politically legitimate form of governance. While we may look beyond them to fully understand the processes of international governance, we need not look very far. The bottom line is that governments serve as the independent variable upon which any credence to the fiction of international governance is dependent. Some will ask whether it is desirable for governments to function as such. The answer must turn on the emphasis placed on the democratic legitimacy of wielding influence over others. Only the democratic state exists as the legitimate platform of representing its population's convictions. This fundamental organizing political precept should not be easily smothered by idealistic rhetoric of the "collective community." Until NGOs and IOs mature into equally democratic forms of representation, their influence cannot be treated as benign, even where their initiatives are shared by states. States must chart their course according to their own lights. They must use international governance as much as they can for the ultimate benefit of the people, upon whose mandate government legitimately rules. Anything less would be at best an admission of impotence and, at worst, a function of negligence.Devadas Krishnadas is a graduate student at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy.


The Setonian
News

Professors predict a suspenseful election night

A politically polarized nation will be biting its nails as elections officials tabulate votes in what Tufts professors predict will be a long night- which may not end with a clear winner. "It will be very close regardless of who wins" the 44th Presidency of the United States, Assistant Professor of Political Science Deborah Schildkraut said. Television viewers watching the breakdown of red and blue states will keep their eyes on the pivotal swing states that will decide the election. The swing states for which the results are the most uncertain are Florida, Ohio, Wisconsin, Michigan, Iowa and New Mexico, according to The New York Times. These states represent 86 crucial electoral votes. "Chances are that one or two of the so-called swing states will end up being pivotal," Political Science Professor Kent Portney said. "I'm putting my money on Ohio - it's a diverse state, large enough and with much higher than usual turnout such that the vote counting will be slower than in other places." Certain traditional swing states, such as New Jersey, Pennsylvania and New Hampshire are leaning towards Kerry, while others, including Missouri, Arizona and West Virginia, are leaning towards Bush, according to the Times. Winning the presidency requires securing 270 electoral votes. The current breakdown of votes gives Kerry 227 votes and Bush 225, with the 86 votes still up in the air. Shildkraut said fervor is running high in these battleground states. "In swing states the amount of activity is just off the charts - people are bombarded by commercials and door-to-door, face-to-face activity." Political Science Professor Jim Glaser said, "I have not seen such intensity in my adult life. I've never known so many people working on a campaign, volunteering for a campaign. People on both sides feel like there is a great amount at stake." But despite the closeness of the race, "There will likely be someone who will win the clear majority," Schildkraut said. Glaser agreed, noting that "we will have an outcome - there may be issues surrounding the integrity of [the outcome] ... but I think it will be less painful this time [than in 2000]." Portney said he would bet on a Bush victory based on the electoral vote, adding that "there is still the possibility, as in 2000, that the Democrat can win the popular vote and lose the electoral vote and the election," he said. But Tufts professors warn of the possibility of another electoral quagmire reminiscent of the notorious 2000 election recount. Glaser said a premature declaration of a winner from the media could only exacerbate an already potentially confusing and chaotic election night. "The media has to be careful about making preliminary judgments, as it did for Al Gore and President Bush in 2000," he said. Even if one candidate wins a clear electoral majority, Schildkraut predicts "lawsuits and protests ... there might be pressure on the person who doesn't get the majority to fight whatever the outcome is," she said. Both candidates are attempting to work within the U.S. voting system, Schildkraut said. "The 2000 election exposed so many weak points in the [electoral] system that could be exploited by each side. Each side is trying to figure out how to exploit this, and trying to defend against the other side's expectations and attacks," she said. In some swing states, Goldman said, extremely close results could lead to indecisive deadlock, necessitating another appeal to the Supreme Court, as with Florida in 2000. Due to the conservative bent of the justices currently sitting on the Court, such an outcome would undoubtedly favor a Republican victory, Goldman said. And pollsters' predictions could have little predictive value on Election Day, since voter turnout is often affected by weather and other uncontrollable variables. "Turnout nationally will be relatively high, perhaps around 55 percent, although I think turnout in Florida, a swing state, will probably be lower than average, primarily because of the large numbers of prospective voters who are still feeling the effects of the hurricanes," Portney said.


The Setonian
News

The suppression of Tufts activist theater

This year, several Tufts undergraduates came together to form Rat-a-TAT, Tufts Activist Theater. We were excited. Last year, we had seen many shows that could have been activist but were not given the proper space. Instead, shows like "Piece of My Heart," "Corpus Christi" and "Uncommon Women and Others" were only seen as entertainment. Each play had a strong message, but audiences were not given the opportunity to start real conversations based on the thoughts that the plays brought up in a structured and informed way. Instead, audiences left feeling that they had learned something new, but having no way to figure out exactly what they had learned or what to do with it. Armed with all of our paperwork, passion and support, several members of Rat-a-TAT went to the Tufts Community Union Judiciary (TCUJ) to seek recognition. When we arrived, members of the TCUJ bombarded us with questions, trying to find reasons for refusing to recognize us. Despite the fact that the Judiciary had invited us to come and knew the purpose of our group, none of its members had taken a few minutes to research the other theater groups on campus - if our purpose was too close to another organization's purpose, it would have been that of other theater group. Instead of defending our own organization in an informed manner, we were forced to first spend 15 minutes describing the other theater organizations on campus. It was surprising and disappointing to learn that members of the committee that decides whether or not organizations can exist on campus know so little about the organizations already in existence - organizations which some of the current members of the Judiciary have either recognized or re-recognized. We were shocked to realize that individuals in such a powerful position seemed out of touch with the school right outside their conference room in the campus center. Once we had described the other theater organizations, the third degree began. Why weren't we under the umbrella of another group? Was it about money? If there was more money available for, say, Pen, Paint and Pretzels (3Ps), would we be part of their group? Was our group seeking recognition to get money? Were the other groups excluding us due to prejudice? Question after question was either about money (when we were asking for recognition, not funding) or about other groups, which put us in a position of either slandering other groups or not receiving a favorable response to our request for recognition. However, the mood as we left was one of peacefulness; we had been given the impression that we would be told to restructure parts of our constitution and come back again once the issues had been fixed. Instead, the response to our request was e-mailed at 3:30 a.m. (an hour and a half after promised), saying that we had been rejected and that the only explanation was "our decision had to be made following the Committee on Student Life's criteria outlined in the Pachyderm, which Rat-a-Tat did not satisfy." At the bottom of the e-mail was a list of e-mail addresses for the Committee on Student Life (CSL), whom we contacted right away to appeal. In addition, we wrote back to the chair of the Judiciary, requesting specific reasons for the rejection so that we could address them for the appeal. Two days later, we received an e-mail requesting our constitution, which was immediately sent. In the meantime, the CSL had suggested contacting Dean of Students Bruce Reitman, who could facilitate an arbitration to settle the matter more quickly. Six days after the original request for recognition, the only people who had been remiss in responding to requests were the members of the TCUJ. Rat-a-TAT was left with their hands tied, since Reitman could not decide if the arbitration was warranted when he had not been informed of why we were rejected. Although we have support from 3Ps, Bare Bodkin and several faculty members from various departments, we are not allowed to plan events, book rooms or do virtually anything until this matter is settled. A full week after the TCUJ rejected Rat-a-TAT's application for recognition, an explanation was sent. The group explained that it we had been rejected on four points. One of these was the result of a question asked during the meeting about money. Half our reply had been ignored. Other reasons resulted from confusions that had not been brought up during the meeting and could easily have been rectified had Rat-a-TAT been given the chance to explain. The most frustrating part of the entire explanation was that we had not been granted an opportunity to answer the questions that came up during the Judiciary's deliberation, nor were we allowed to re-submit a revised constitution that addressed these issues. Perhaps the most frustrating element of this whole mess is the fact that Tufts University claims to encourage student service and involvement, and yet it is the students themselves who prevent their peers from serving the community. Instead of making recognition a battle in which the group must slander others, why can't we make recognition a simple task where one must intelligently and articulately explain and defend one's organization? It is hard enough getting a new group organized enough to present a case to the Judiciary. It should not be the J's job to thwart the excitement and possibilities of new student groups.Christina Hanson is a senior majoring in English and women's studies. Allie Bohm is a sophomore majoring in English and peace and justice studies.


The Setonian
News

Theater Review: Drama department presents a tragic winner

Few New Englanders attending the Boston Red Sox victory parade this weekend stood on the sidelines with anything less than a mountain of pride for their clutch good ol' boys. The Drama Department also presented Boston with a premiere "Parade" this weekend, a musical directed by Professor Barbara Grossman that marches to a beat of its own, more solemn drummer, one echoing familiar American themes of bigotry and racism, this time with a tragic and anti-Semitic tempo. Indeed, as the painted and abstract promotional posters plastered throughout campus suggest, "Parade," written by Alfred Uhry with lyrics by Jason Robert Brown, is a "documusical" that challenges the Meridith Wilson (The Music Man) and Andrew Lloyd Webber (Evita) happy-go-lucky musical theater mold. Its style and subject provoke change. The production details the true story of Leo Frank (Greg Fujita) and his plucky wife Lucille (Julia Arazi) as their American dream quickly becomes a nightmare consisting of false accusations, a death sentence, partial acquittal and, finally, an unjust lynching. Welcome to Atlanta circa 1913. With Civil War wounds unhealed and protruding from the city like exposed bone, the South is no place for Frank, a Jew who falls victim to the religious and racial tension simmering in General Sherman's bloody wake. On the whole, Fujita and Arazi give excellent, convincing lead performances. Yet while Lucille's character possesses extra dimensions that transform her scripted part into an empathetic, warm-blooded woman, Leo feels closer to the stereotype of a desperate, dead-man-walking character. This gripe may be an issue with the script, however: a lack of character development is the crux of many musical theater grievances. That this show attacks a serious, dramatic issue makes it all the more noticeable. Yet, admirably, Fujita was exactly what the script called for: nervous, aloof and nothing short of fidgety. As for Arazi, she speaks and sings like a genuine southern belle, with an infallible southern accent and sweet but confident voice. At the same time, her nuanced, detailed performance conveys a particularly human image of Lucille. For example, during a courtroom scene in which Leo stands to be convicted of murder, Arazi's facial expressions genuinely reflect a personal conflict concerning her husband's complex situation - and their marriage. Together, Fujita and Arazi provide the show with a hopefulness and emotion that helps the audience connect to the story. Ironically, the on-stage couple's relationship evolves from lackluster to impassioned as Frank's death sentence renders him more alive. Some of the ensemble, incidentally, would do well to follow Arazi's southern lead, as stubborn Yankee accents resurface a bit too often. Borrowing a line from Leo Frank, a suggestion for them: don't be such "Meshuganahs!" However, light, entertaining choreography interspersed throughout and a full, clear choral sound render the ensemble a pleasurable component. Any overt Yankeeness can be forgiven, though, since most of the acting is assured, energetic and confident. Actor Dan Balkin provides some of the most entertaining moments and badly needed comedic relief as the drunken sensationalist reporter Britt Craig. His performances are lively, funny and very physical as he sings, dances, rolls on the floor and stumbles all over the stage during his solo "Big News" and its reprise, "Real Big News." He might play an irresponsible, conniving reporter, but the audience loves him anyway. Mischievous, charismatic and imperfect, Craig represents many of the larger issues addressed by the play at the end, when he contemplates his opportunistic role in the death of Leo, unable to reach a full catharsis for his jaundiced misdeeds. George Rausch plays a convincing Governor John Slaton who, despite a forthcoming election, sides (mostly) with reason and principle to eventually pardon Mr. Frank from an official death sentence. On the opposite end of the moral spectrum, Alex Sherman is appropriately nasty as the ambitious prosecutor Hugh Dorsey. But a review of this production would be remiss without noting the excellent performance of Jaime Cepero, who plays Jim Conley, a Black janitor who becomes a viable suspect in the murder long after Frank has been incarcerated. Cepero inhabits his character so well and so professionally that, at times, his performance overshadows the other actors. One of the reasons that Cepero's performance was so outstanding could be attributed to the fact that he was chosen from a wider pool of actors than Tufts could provide - he is a part-time student at Bridgewater State College. Cepero's ability to fill the role so perfectly left some parts feeling hollow when they otherwise would have appeared sound. A fantastic set and beautiful period costumes contribute greatly to the southern feel of the story. Balch Arena becomes archetypal Main Street, Atlanta, complete with authentic-looking porches, screens and even a politician's parade float that would make any southerner nostalgic. Both cast and musicians deftly navigate the complex rhythms, rounds and melodies demanded by the award-winning score. Interwoven throughout the performance, recognizable American folk tunes delight, trumpet calls invigorate and slow pieces move. The orchestra plays hidden behind the large set, creating a sometimes overly subdued sound. This was especially noticeable during the full-ensemble scenes, as it contributed to occasional intonation and timing problems among the performers. All in all, Tufts students are fortunate to have such a poignant, touching and important musical just footsteps away.Balch Arena becomes archetypal Main Street, Atlanta, complete with authentic-looking porches, screens, and even a politician's parade float that would make any southerner nostalgic.



The Setonian
News

Failure of the Cuban Embargo

Last year, Senators Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) introduced a bill to Congress to end the Cuban embargo, named the "United States-Cuba Trade Act of 2003." All I have to say is: it's about time. For the last 40 years, the Cuban embargo has been an eyesore of U.S. foreign policy on numerous levels. First and foremost, it has accomplished few of its goals. President John F. Kennedy began the embargo in October 1962, in order to punish Fidel Castro's regime for allowing the storage of Soviet nuclear arms in Cuba. Today, Castro is a billionaire and looks as though he will dictate Cuba from his deathbed. The embargo was supposed to place pressure on Castro to eventually reform the communist system in Cuba, promote democracy and improve human rights. Today, Castro has a complete stronghold on all aspects of human life, the communist system still reigns and the Cuban people have suffered immensely. One would think that after so many years of failure, politicians would have rethought this ridiculous policy towards Cuba sooner. The embargo did have a national security rationale during the Cold War, as America was trying to contain communism and prevent a nuclear catastrophe. However, the Cold War ended in 1991 when the Soviet Union ceased to exist. There is no more communist threat, and the United States is the lone superpower of the world. So the embargo never made sense in the post-Cold War world, as it outlived one of its main objectives by 12 years: quarantining countries allied with the Soviet Union. What is worse than the failure and illogicality of the embargo is that Cubans have suffered from it. For most of the past 40 years, Cubans have been denied essential American food products and medical supplies, creating incredible hardships for the people. The Cuban economy has lost billions in potential revenue from being restricted from trading freely with the United States. Cuba is a poor, dysfunctional country of 11 million people that poses absolutely no threat to us. So why did we continue these harsh sanctions that simply hurt innocent people? Americans have been hurt by the embargo as well, as a potential U.S. multibillion dollar export industry in Cuba has been squandered to foreign firms and companies. The embargo restricts Americans' right to travel, a restriction that resembles the former Soviet Union's efforts to prevent their citizens from traveling to "problematic" countries. Proponents of the embargo argue that lifting it would boost Castro's regime by giving him more access to money and power. On the contrary, Castro has relied on the embargo as a scapegoat for his country's problems, even though most of Cuba's problems are the result of Castro's own past and present failures. Allowing free trade with and travel to Cuba would undermine Castro by preventing him from tacking his country's woes on the United States. In an age when the United States needs as many allies as possible, this embargo contributes to the way that many countries look at us scornfully, as a bully who is unnecessarily harming her less fortunate neighbor. We have far greater problems to deal with than whether U.S. citizens are spending money in Cuba. Although dealing with Iraq and terrorism is currently the priority of our government, a decision to lift the Cuban embargo in the near future would be a monumental change in the lives of Cubans, Cuban-Americans and Americans. It would be a win-win situation for Cubans and Americans: cheap, high- quality American goods such as food and medicine would circulate throughout Cuba, and unique, cultural Cuban goods like cigars, clothing and coffee would circulate throughout the United States. Both economies would improve, the quality of life would improve in Cuba and Americans would benefit from being able to freely visit Cuba, a culturally rich, beautiful country with friendly, enthusiastic people. It is time, finally, to end this counterproductive, nonsensical and immoral policy. Normalizing relations with Cuba will not perfect life on the island, but it is an important departure from the failure of the embargo and a step towards a more sound United States foreign policy.Stephan Vitvitsky is a junior majoring in political science. He can be reached via e-mail at stephan.vitvitsky@tufts.edu.


The Setonian
News

Women's Cross Country: Jumbos disappointed in sixth place finish at NESCAC's

The women's cross country team placed sixth on Saturday in the NESCAC Cross Country Championships held at Colby College in Waterville, Maine. The finish was a disappointment to the team, which entered the event aiming to beat Wesleyan (fifth) and Colby (fourth). "We could have been fourth," coach Kristen Morwick said. "Wesleyan's definitely a team we could beat. Colby's a team a team we could have beat. It gives our team a little motivation." Junior Becca Ades led the Jumbos with a 17th place finish (19:05), followed by sophomore Raquel Morgan (24th, 19:20) and freshman Katy O'Brien (30th, 19:32). Freshman Catherine Beck, senior Katie Sheedy, and freshmen Anna Shih and Laura Walls formed a close second pack finishing 35th (19:42), 37th (19:43), 41st (19:45), and 46th (19:50) respectively. Sophomore Jenny Torpey (59th, 20:10) and senior Katie Mason (64th, 20:14) were close behind for the Jumbos. "Katie Sheedy, Jenny Torpey and Katie Mason really ran great," Morwick said. "Everyone else was pretty average. We need to do better if we're going to qualify as a team [for the National Championship meet]." Sophomore Sarah Crispin, who has consistently been among the Jumbos top seven, dropped out of the race with a bad hamstring on the steady uphill located a half mile into the Campbell Cross Country Trails at Colby. The hamstring pain was enough to give Crispin trouble walking. Her exit helped motivate some of the team, especially Sheedy, Crispin's unofficial racing partner this season. "It made other people step up more," Morwick said. "Sheedy ended up having a great race because she kind of knew it was on her." NESCAC experienced a rare occurrence when Middlebury tied Williams for the team title with 59 points for each school. According to NESCAC rules, there is no tiebreaker in those cases. Most high schools would score the sixth finisher on the team to break the tie, but even the NCAA level meets do not use tiebreakers. The two teams dominated the competition, with third place Amherst a distant 36 points behind at 95. Middlebury, which had been ranked behind both Williams and Amherst in most polls, had a strong showing. "I was surprised a little bit. Middlebury is a team that tends to come on in the bigger meet," Morwick said. "I think they have five seniors in the top seven now. I think the experience goes to them a little a bit." The Jumbos were disappointed with the sixth place finish because at the NCAA Division III New England Regional Meet in two weeks in Twin Brooks, Maine, only the top five teams will qualify for the National Championship meet in Eau Claire, Wisconsin. "This is an eye opener for us," senior tri-captain Emily Pfiel said. "It shakes a lot of people out of complacency. It's a good motivator." However the team is confident that the Regional meet, with more teams and runners, will benefit them because of the number of runners that can displace team packs. "In a smaller meet, Wesleyan's 1-2 is going to kill us more than at a regional meet. You're going to put a lot more people in between them in a bigger meet," Morwick said. "It's a different ballgame when you get to that meet. We're not talking about 11 teams. We're talking about 35 teams." Morwick stressed the importance of the Jumbos 1-3 runners stepping up if the Jumbos want to have postseason success. Both Colby and Wesleyan put two runners across the finish line before Ades. "We beat them in our 4-7. Our 1-3 needs to run better. None of them ran particularly well," Morwick said. "We had seven runners in before [Wesleyan] had five. They just have a very good 1-2. When they beat you 1-2 it doesn't matter what their fifth does." "I'm not saying we were terrible, we can run better," Morwick added. "All three of them are really disappointed in their race." Tough academic schedules this past week contributed to the Jumbos' troubles on Saturday, taking their toll particularly on Ades. Morwick did not see Ades towards the end of the week because of school work. "Becca has had a tough week. I don't think she was expecting to do that well [because of it]," said Pfiel. "I'm not too worried about Becca when we get to the bigger meets. I think she can get [the top runners]." The Jumbos are clearly not worried about their chances to qualify for the National meet, despite the disappointing finish. The team is confident it can beat both Wesleyan and Colby, who are currently the immediate competition for the final two spots for the National meet. "Colby had a clear advantage because it was their home course. They knew how to race it," Morwick said. "We don't pull out all the stops for NESCACs. We'll be much more prepared for a race at Twin Brooks than at Colby." Many members of the team ran just as fast, if not faster, at Colby's hilly, frozen course than at Franklin Park at the All New England Championships a few weeks ago. "I think it was really good for us to run a course that was tougher," Pfiel said. "That's huge because Franklin Park is such a faster course. The implications for success at Regionals remain the same for Morwick, as the Jumbos varsity prepares over the next two weeks for Twin Brooks. "We're in the same boat as we always were," Morwick said. "If you're going to have a bad race, you'd rather do it at NESCACs than at Regionals. We're shooting for the top five, but we're having to do it with four freshmen in there. It's tough. They don't understand yet the importance of some of these races, but they will."


The Setonian
News

Holding Tufts Votes responsible

While failing to turn in several voter registration forms on time is completely irresponsible, belittling Tufts Votes' intentions will not solve anything. Thursday's editorial ("Tufts Votes should be held accountable for its irresponsibility") charges that Tufts Votes and affiliated groups used "University money irresponsibly" and treated voter registration as "just another activity to list on a resume."


The Setonian
News

Jonathan Graham | Voice of the Daily

The decision last week to print a student's name who was accused of attacking another student because of his sexual orientation was the hardest decision I have ever had to make as editor-in-chief.


The Setonian
News

Men's Cross Country: NESCAC foes no match as Jumbos repeat

They didn't have the fastest runners right at the top. They just had the best team. Led by junior champion Neal Holtschulte, Williams Ephs finished first, third, and sixth overall, but the Tufts Jumbos used tight running and depth to win their second consecutive NESCAC Cross Country Championship Saturday at Colby. Led by junior Matt Lacey in fourth place overall, Tufts totaled 43 points to relegate Williams (62) to bridesmaid status for the second consecutive year. It wasn't as close as last year, when Tufts' top five accumulated 48 points to Williams' 57. "We'd been second so many darn times that we were bound to push through," coach Connie Putnam said. "So it was great to do it last year, and then do it again and cement that we are the premier team in this conference." Lacey finished fourth overall with a time of 25:40.11, holding off Williams senior Sam Van Volkenburgh (25:43.68) but just losing out for third place to Eph sophomore Stephen Wills, who finished in 25:39.20. "I was kind of angry that I lost to him," Lacey said. "I was ahead of him, and I should have beaten him." "Matt Lacey never ceases to present me with a great race," Putnam said. "He goes all out every time. Today was another example of him getting it done up front when I should be getting slightly better races from some other guys." Joining Lacey in the top ten overall were sophomore Josh Kennedy (25:45.52) and senior co-captains Brian McNamara (25:46.97) and Nate Brigham (25:48.45), who was feeling a little sick and didn't have his usual top notch race. The trio finished seventh through ninth overall, while junior Matt Fortin finished 15th overall with a time of 26:04.62 to round out the Jumbo scoring. Tufts went out very hard from the start and was in control throughout the first several miles. Williams' top three caught up and passed the Jumbo pack coming down the course's hill to mount a challenge at the three mile mark. But Williams' fourth and fifth runners finished 22nd and 30th overall, and the Jumbos had more than enough up front for the win. "We were pissed that we let Williams get three runners in front of our pack," Lacey said. "That definitely shouldn't happen again." "We weren't quite up to par, not quite healthy, but we got things done pretty handily anyway," Putnam said. In much the same way that the Red Sox might never be able to match their World Series celebration this year, the Jumbos were far less jubilant than they were last year after winning their first league title. "It definitely wasn't the same as last year," Lacey admitted. "We're looking ahead to Regionals and Nationals." "We kind of kept it in until we got on the bus, then I gave them a little pep talk and told them I was proud of them," Putnam added. "They know when I'm happy." Putnam confessed that he was indeed worried that the team wasn't quite focused enough coming in. "I was almost worried that they were a little too lackadaisical and too confident," he said. But while the Jumbos definitely are looking ahead, Putnam couldn't help but stress the importance of winning on Saturday. "I really wanted the guys to repeat," he said. "This might have been one of the most important races of my career, in terms of what I wanted the guys to accomplish and what I wanted them to realize they could do. It's important for us to understand that we are capable of repeating. Now we've been in both postures. Last year we had to go get that first win, and now we had to fend off Williams. It's important to experience it both ways." With a second title under their belt, Tufts' top seven will sit out next week's ECAC Championship at Grafton in preparation for the Nov. 13 NCAA New England Championship. "Winning again was great, but we have bigger fish to fry than this," Putnam said. "What we really want to do is go out to the NCAA's and do something there."


The Setonian
News

I love the Red Sox

I love the Red Sox so much it's not even funny. If Oct. 27 became the new Christmas for New England, then the day after surely must be New Year's Day - it became a fresh start for generations of millions of Red Sox hopefuls. The Red Sox won the World Series. No matter how many times I say it, hear it, read it, could it be true? It is surreal, dream-like; only Tim McCarver doesn't usually call my dreams, and the Red Sox are never champions when I wake up. People keep saying it is going to be different now, no more loveable losers and no more "curse" to secretly revel complaining about. People snidely sneer that there is no more reason for us to care. No reason to care? If I didn't care, would I be sitting here, not even 24 hours since the Greatest Victory in Sports History, watching reruns of this season's extra inning games on NESN? Would I still be getting chills watching Big Papi hit that Easter day game winning home run in the twelfth or be clapping as Timlin gets the last out in a mid-season Yankees game? I am a Red Sox fan. If it weren't repetitive, I would say I bleed red - but I do. Standing in line for over two hours the other day outside Fenway, waiting just to get a glimpse of the exorbitantly priced World Series memorabilia that waited inside, there was only one way to describe the mood at the Fen. It was the same feeling that raced through my mind when 27 outs were finally and officially recorded, it was the same feeling that washed over the face of every Red Sox fan I hugged that wonderful night, it was the same feeling that has draped itself over Boston like a blanket we've been missing for far too long. Happiness: genuine, pure, blissful happiness. No Fenway Faithful or proud member of Red Sox Nation knew what that word truly meant until 86 years of "what ifs?" were finally washed away. But have we changed? Ask those fans already looking forward to opening day against the Evil Empire, and you'll get your answer. Bill Buckner, Bucky Dent, Bob Gibson, Bambino: like Tom Petty sang, "don't come around here no more." No more curse; we can now talk about the cure of 2004. Fifty years from now we'll be telling our grandchildren about the exploits of these new inductees to that exclusive club of Boston legend. Generations from now the renown of Schilling and Ortiz, Martinez and Ramirez, will forever be reminisced and adored by the city of Boston - while the likes of Bellhorn and Kapler and Roberts will remain with us diehards until the day we die. I never believed in the curse, but looking up at a blood red moon that night made me believe in destiny. I cannot help but think of the countless men who have graced the ranks of the Red Sox and have come as close as many of us thought would ever be possible. 1946, 1967, 1975, 1986 ... Ted Williams, Johnny Pesky, Jim Lonborg, Jim Rice, Carl Yastrzemski, Carlton Fisk, Luis Tiant, Bill Lee, Wade Boggs, Roger Clemens, even Bill Buckner. Those dates and those names are each synonymous with greatness and misery - scorn and admiration for countless Red Sox fans - but they can all take comfort now, because this victory was far too important to be constrained for this one team and this one generation of fans. This was for everyone. It just hit me. For the umpteenth (but certainly not the final) time, the local news is showing the video of that infamous last out rolling between the unsure feet of Bill Buckner. In the past, I've felt physically sick, but not this time. For once I smiled, because the Boston Red Sox are the greatest team in baseball, and it is not only we loyal fans who know it. I cannot wait for spring training and opening day, waking up on that glorious morning in early spring when Sox tickets go on sale. Have things changed? Of course they have. The Boston Red Sox are World Series Champions - but I am cheering again watching NESN run the highlight reel of Mark Bellhorn score the tying run in the bottom of the ninth against the Royals. It goes without saying, but I love the Red Sox.Andrew Bauld is a sophomore who has not yet declared a major.


The Setonian
News

National security is top issue

Policy decisions by the Bush administration have made American national security the worst it has been in years, if the opinions of Tufts political science professors are anything to go by. The comments by renowned journalist Seymour Hersh re-emphasize the policy mistakes made by the Bush administration, in Iraq and elsewhere. If one issue sends you to the polls tomorrow, it should be how bad U.S. national security has gotten.


The Setonian
News

City vs. Country

This past week, 60 American college students living and studying in Tokyo were transformed into country bumpkins. In some sort of masochistic (but greatly appreciated) effort to expand our horizons regarding Japan and its culture, my program directors decided to haul us around Nagano, Japan for about a week. I don't think the city or prefecture of Nagano has experienced such an invasion of foreigners since the 1998 Winter Olympics.


The Setonian
News

Tufts professors discuss national security and terrorism issues

Tufts experts cite failures on the part of President George W. Bush and John Kerry in the way they have chosen to address national security and terrorism. The Bush administration's decision to go to war with Iraq has left the United States "much less secure," according to Assistant Professor of Political Science Jeffrey Taliaferro. He described the tremendous cost of the war and the way it has "alienated the entire Arab world and also our traditional allies - it has done incredible damage to U.S. interests around the world." Despite the "ever-changing public rationales for the war," Taliaferro said the core of the American security strategy stems from neoconservative views on terrorism. In their eyes, terrorism is a direct result of domestic politics in the Arab world, Taliaferro said, since young Arab men can only express their frustrations through militant Islamic fundamentalist terrorist groups. The Bush administration responded to this perceived threat first by overthrowing the Taliban in Afghanistan and then ousting Saddam Hussein in Iraq, Taliaferro said. Though Kerry has criticized Bush's failures mostly vis-? -vis foreign policy, he has not produced a coherent alternative rationale for security and terrorism, Professor of Political Science Tony Smith said. "Kerry has been inconsistent on the war," he said. "But his statement only about a month ago that if he knew then, when he voted to support the President who was moving toward war, what he knows now he'd still vote for war, sums it all up." Erik Dahl, a Ph.D. candidate at the Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy and a retired naval intelligence officer, called it "disappointing" that Kerry, who served in the military, could not put together a more substantial alternative view on Iraq or portray himself as soft on terrorists. "He does not want to challenge the strong leadership of a wartime president," Dahl said. Kerry's counterpoint to Bush's Iraq argument has mainly focused on his failures in Afghanistan - the military failure to apprehend Osama Bin Laden and flawed management on the ground, Dahl said. He said Kerry has also made the case that Bush has not focused attention on other, more pressing threats to national security from abroad, including Iran and North Korea. Despite these inconsistencies, Kerry portrays himself as more open-minded to diplomacy and does not attract the same dislike abroad as Bush currently does. "In light of frayed relations with long-standing allies, Kerry [as president] would be much better positioned to rebuild than would a second Bush term," Taliaferro said. Though many of Bush's policies are unpopular aboard, particularly in Europe, he still garners support at home with his "smoke-'em-out" rhetoric and divisive but definitive policy decisions. "Recent polls have shown that Bush voters tend to believe - two thirds of them - that Saddam had a major [weapons of mass destruction] industry going and that he was working with al Qaeda," Smith said. Both assumptions are incorrect, Smith said but provides for "a population frightened by Sept. 11 and patriotic in defense of the homeland to vote for the Republicans whom they correctly identify as being more aggressive militarily." The nature of terrorism, however, makes it impossible to predict the odds of another direct terrorist attack, Taliaferro said. "Al Qaeda is a threat that is still there, and can possibly grow regardless of whether Bush or Kerry occupies the office," he said. According to Taliaferro, Bush's domestic security policy has been mainly focused on restricting the number of visas issued to foreigners, based "on theory that [these people] might be potential terrorists," and establish cells capable of executing large-scale destruction, Taliaferro said. This policy, however, has negative ramifications for the United States and leaves gaps in other areas of national security. "[The visa restrictions] are hurting the U.S. in the long run," Taliaferro said. "The U.S. depends on talented people from other countries to fill ranks of student bodies and play vital role in research and development." Taliaferro said far more could be done to secure the transportation infrastructure and was appalled at "how little time and money was spent [on the part of the Bush administration] on securing ports. Airport and [marine] port security is still a mess; the railroad network is still vulnerable." Kerry has criticized this aspect of domestic policy, as well as the Patriot Act and its restrictions on civil liberties. Many of his actions have implied that he would like to diffuse the atmosphere of fear. But Kerry "walks a fine line," Dahl said, between presenting alternative ways of fighting terrorism and appearing weak to the American public. "Against a wartime president, Kerry needs to not appear waffling or weak on the [severity of] the threats," he said.


The Setonian
News

Mystic River project

Thursday's informative feature story written by James Ford ("New Program seeks students to help Mystic effort") had one thing worth clarifying, and a significant omission worth mentioning.


The Setonian
News

Bring back the 'jams' Fabel says

Hip-hop artist, activist, and historian Jorge "Fabel" Pabon captivated a small audience in Pearson last Thursday with his discussion on the evolution of hip-hop.


The Setonian
News

Alex Bloom | Philly Phodder

ourscore and six years ago (Jayson Stark may have already found this saying, but I assure you I thought of it before seeing his column) our Red Sox forefathers brought forth on this Nation a championship, conceived in glory, and dedicated to the proposition that Boston is created more equally than other baseball cities. Now we are engaged in a great curse, testing whether that Nation or any Nation can long endure ... oh wait ... we did endure. In the spirit of Boston legend Paul Revere... The Red Sox are the 2004 World Series Champions! The Red Sox are the 2004 World Series Champions! The Red Sox are the 2004 World Series Champions! The Red Sox are the 2004 World Series Champions! The Red Sox are the 2004 World Series Champions! Has it sunk in yet? I didn't think so. The Sox became the first baseball team in history to come back from down three games in a best-of-seven, and to then go on and sweep the World Series. If you're not counting, that's eight straight playoff wins ignited solely by a ninth-inning Kevin Millar walk issued by the greatest closer in baseball postseason history in Game 4 against the Yankees. Now the rest (two marathon games ending in walk-offs, a bloody good performance from Schilling, D-Lowe and Damon winning Game 7 as the Sox bring out World Series broomsticks) is postseason history. Hollywood couldn't have scripted this ending (which is why they are rewriting Jimmy Fallon's Fever Pitch). This will be my last Red Sox column for at least a month, so I'm going to wrap up this season like any good Hollywood feature film ... with a soundtrack. Track 1 will be dedicated to the leadoff hitter, Johnny "Come lately" Damon. Damon decided to break out of his 3-29 slump in the first six ALCS games in a grand way in Game 7 to guarantee a Sox Series berth, and then pounded the Cardinals for four games, despite never adjusting his wild man look. So Track 1 is Steppenwolf's "Born to Be Wild." Track 2 goes to the ALCS MVP: David Ortiz. To say that his two game-winning hits (including three RBI in Game 5) and his.387 average against the Yankees carried the team is underestimating, to say the least. The intimidating man known as "Papi" gets Track 2 with "Big Poppa" by Notorious B.I.G. Track 3 goes to Manny Ramirez, Pedro Martinez, and Bronson Arroyo. Every playoff viewer has to believe these three have smoked themselves stupid. Look at them. Manny and Pedro can never stop giggling, and Arroyo has cornrows. Marijuana might also explain the decline in Pedro's velocity and Manny's speed and fielding ability (save for an outfield assist in the World Series). They would have played harder, but Track 3 is their excuse: Afroman's "Because I Got High." Track 4 is reserved for the Red Sox redeemer, Curt Schilling. After a horrendous Game 1 start against the Yankees and an undoubtedly painful (and creative) medical treatment, Schilling, wearing a true red "sox," shut up New York City and returned the Sox to glory, attributing his effort to religious faith. And there may be no other explanation for Schilling's gutsy performance. So Track 4 must be Jon Bon Jovi's "Living on a Prayer." Kevin Millar's walk was the catalyst for the eight-game win streak in the postseason, and he more than anyone "cowboyed up" with the Sox' postseason hopes on the line. Naturally, as team leader and the pilot of last year's motto (he has it on a decal on the back of his Hummer), Millar gets Kid Rock's "Cowboy" for Track 5. Track 6 belongs to Mike Timlin. Despite some good outings, this guy really knew how to make bad situations worse. For instance, after relieving Lowe in Game 4, Timlin surrendered two runs. And if you can think back far enough to the series with Anaheim, you'll recall that Timlin gave up five runs (including Vlad Guerrero's slam) to let the Angels back into Game 3. So for his ability to pour some gasoline on the fire, Timlin gets Billy Joel's "We Didn't Start the Fire." Foulke was invaluable to this team's title run and shut the lid on so many games that Track 7 needs to be Semisonic's "Closing Time." Track 8 is for the Skipper, although, at times, he reminded me of Gilligan. On a team of idiots, it doesn't surprise me that Terry Francona is king. He made some smart moves during these playoffs (sticking with Mark Bellhorn, pinch-running Dave Roberts in Game 4 against New York), and he made some dumb moves (bringing in Pedro in Game 7 of the ALCS). But, for me, he'll always be the village idiot, making Green Day's "American Idiot" fitting for Track 8. Track 9 captures the essence of these self-described "idiots" who often compared their clubhouse atmosphere to a frat house. And with the recent admission by Millar on Fox's "The Best Damn Sports Show Ever" that the team did shots of Jack Daniels before their final six postseason games, I'm reminded of John Belushi in Animal House, a little bit buzzed, singing with the rest of the Delta Tau Chi brothers. Track 9 has to be The Kingsmen's "Louie, Louie." Track 10 is for the Curse of the Bambino, which has been officially vanquished with the World Series victory. A lot of people thought hell would freeze over before it ended. REM's "It's The End of the World as We Know It" gets Track 10. Track 11 is obviously a certain number by Queen. Let it fully sink in. Your Red Sox are the 2004 World Series Champions. Sing it loud. "We are the Champions."


The Setonian
News

State rep Ciampa will run as a write-in

State Representative and 16-year incumbent Vincent Ciampa will fight for his political life tomorrow in his write-in campaign against Democratic nominee Carl Sciortino. Fewer than two weeks before the election, Ciampa announced a last minute write-in campaign to win back his seat from Sciortino, who faces no Republican opponent. Sciortino was defeated in the Democratic primary for the Massachusetts 34th House District by a narrow 93 votes this September. Ciampa is running as an independent and his name will not appear on Tuesday's ballot. He has instead sent out a flyer to voters in the district with stickers to place on the ballot, allowing them to write in, or stick on, his name. The sticker campaign coincides with an abundance of posters urging voters to "stick with" Ciampa. Historically, write-in campaigns are rarely successful. Regardless, Ciampa has expressed optimism for his chances of reelection. But the most controversial aspect of the election has been a flyer sent to residents of the 34th district last week, calling Sciortino a "homosexual, anti-Catholic extremist" and highlighting a protest that Sciortino and his partner held at the Holy Cross Cathedral. According to the Parents' Rights Coalition, a local conservative group, Sciortino stood up with his back to the altar during a Catholic Mass in June of 2003 and reportedly kissed his partner. Sciortino denies the kissing claim and says he was at the church to protest the Catholic Church's opposition to the Massachusetts State Legislature's vote to allow gay marriage. Sciortino responded with a press release stating, "Unfortunately, my opponent has made this an ugly campaign, but we are trying to stay positive and focus on the issues that really matter to the families in Medford and Somerville." "I don't believe the voters in our community respond well to hate-mail," Sciortino told the Daily. "Most of the voters I've talked to have been less than pleased with the negative mail coming from Ciampa and his supporters, and we are picking up more support because of my commitment to all the issues." The flyers were sponsored by the PRC, with which Ciampa has denied any involvement, but Ciampa does admit that in discussing Sciortino's protest in the cathedral, they have brought out "an issue of grave importance," "I'm trying to run a sticker campaign, and they've got an issue with Mr. Sciortino," Ciampa said. "What he did [at the cathedral] was absolutely absurd, and he should answer to the public." In response, the Sciortino campaign has continued to use the techniques that brought it success in the primaries - meeting with voters and concentrating on issues that concern area residents. "I am confident the voters will respond favorably to our message, we've been campaigning very hard on all the issues that our community cares about," Sciortino said. His campaign has sent out various mailings to area residents emphasizing his status as the Democratic nominee and the endorsements he's gathered since winning the nomination. Ciampa called Sciortino a "one issue candidate" who focused on gay marriage and distorted Ciampa's record regarding a vote on $1 million of school funding for Medford and Somerville. Ciampa claimed that his vote against a bill to fund schools was to preserve public safety jobs. Sciortino contended that Ciampa had no proof that public safety jobs would be lost as a result of the bill's passage. "I'm running a campaign based on the false accusations; the fact that Mr. Sciortino was with me in the beginning of this campaign, until my constitutional convention vote [to ban gay marriage and allow civil unions]," Ciampa said. "That's where Mr. Sciortino and I separated - Mr. Sciortino thinks government is about self service." Ciampa also has attacked Sciortino for the donations he has accepted, most recently $400 from controversial former Massachusetts Speaker of the House Tom Finneran. "He just accepted a check from the Finneran victory fund - less than 24 hours after the Democratic primary," Ciampa said. Sciortino, who has often made issue of his dislike of the leadership style of the former Speaker, said the donation was accepted in the interest of "party unity" and that all Democratic primary winners received such a donation. -- Keith Barry contributed to this article.


The Setonian
News

Vanessa Brewster plays many roles in her business, Osorio

For designer and businesswoman Vanessa Brewster (LA '03) - who held the first sale of her clothing line, Osorio, a year and a half ago at Tufts - entrepreneurship is a family thing. "Both my parents run their own businesses, so I grew up seeing them without a 'boss,'" said Brewster, who graduated from Tufts with an economics degree.